https://chinatribunal.com/
Et internationalt dommertribunal har undersøgt påstandene om systematisk organ høst af politiske
samvittighedsfanger i Kina. Deres konklusion kan læses herunder.
Forced organ harvesting has been committed for years throughout China on a significant scale and that
Falun Gong practitioners have been one – and probably the main – source of organ supply. The concerted
persecution and medical testing of the Uyghurs is more recent and it may be that evidence of forced organ
harvesting of this group may emerge in due course. The Tribunal has had no evidence that the significant
infrastructure associated with China’s transplantation industry has been dismantled and absent a
satisfactory explanation as to the source of readily available organs concludes that forced organ harvesting
continues till today.
På denne video kan ses tribunalets endelige dom:
https://chinatribunal.com/final-judgement-film/
SHORT FORM CONCLUSION of THE CHINA TRIBUNAL’S JUDGMENT
In December 2018 The Tribunal issued an interim judgement:
“The Tribunal’s members are certain – unanimously, and sure beyond reasonable doubt – that in China
forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience has been practiced for a substantial period of time
involving a very substantial number of victims.”
Since then, the Tribunal has contended with a pervasive culture of secrecy, silence and obfuscation by the
PRC relating to much material that could have helped in the determination of whether forced organ
harvesting has occurred in China. The Tribunal is neither deterred nor disabled from reaching a proper
conclusion on the evidence that is available.
China’s reputation as a gross human rights abuser has not had a bearing on the Tribunal in reaching a
proper conclusion. The Tribunal has adopted a process for its work that safeguards an even-handed
approach to the Peoples Republic of China’s (PRC) interests. The Tribunal has requested contributions from
the PRC at every stage.
The Tribunal has considered evidence, in its many forms, and dealt with individual issues according to the
evidence relating to each issue and nothing else and thereby reached a series of conclusions that are free of
any influence caused by the PRC’s reputation or other potential causes of prejudice.
These were as follows;
•
•
•
That there were extraordinarily short waiting times (promised by PRC doctors and hospitals) for
organs to be available for transplantation;
That there was torture of Falun Gong and Uyghurs;
That there was accumulated numerical evidence (excluding spurious PRC data) which indicated:
o
the number of transplant operations performed, and