Udvalget vedrørende Det Etiske Råd 2024-25
UER Alm.del Bilag 8
Offentligt
2964756_0001.png
https://chinatribunal.com/
Et internationalt dommertribunal har undersøgt påstandene om systematisk organ høst af politiske
samvittighedsfanger i Kina. Deres konklusion kan læses herunder. På 1000 militær- og privathospitaler foregår
denne praksis. Dette betyder, hvis der foreligger samarbejde mellem danske forskningsinstitutioner og
kinesiske hospitaler, så er disse danske institutioner etisk set medansvarlige for disse forbrydelser mod
menneskeheden. Hvorledes stiller medlemmerne af etisk råd sig til denne problematik? Vi anlægger den
betragtning, at der må være et etisk regelsæt, der forhindrer samarbejde med lande og institutioner, der
sælger væv og vitale organer for profit, for at beskytte danskere og danske institutioner til ikke at være
meddelagtige i alvorlige forbrydelser. Tribunalet konkluderer som følgende:
Forced organ harvesting has been committed for years throughout China on a significant scale and that
Falun Gong practitioners have been one – and probably the main – source of organ supply. The concerted
persecution and medical testing of the Uyghurs is more recent and it may be that evidence of forced organ
harvesting of this group may emerge in due course. The Tribunal has had no evidence that the significant
infrastructure associated with China’s transplantation industry has been dismantled and absent a
satisfactory explanation as to the source of readily available organs concludes that forced organ harvesting
continues till today.
På denne video kan tribunalets endelige konklusion ses:
https://chinatribunal.com/final-judgement-film/
SHORT FORM CONCLUSION of THE CHINA TRIBUNAL’S JUDGMENT
In December 2018 The Tribunal issued an interim judgement:
“The Tribunal’s members are certain – unanimously, and sure beyond reasonable doubt – that in China
forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience has been practiced for a substantial period of time
involving a very substantial number of victims.”
Since then, the Tribunal has contended with a pervasive culture of secrecy, silence and obfuscation by the
PRC relating to much material that could have helped in the determination of whether forced organ
harvesting has occurred in China. The Tribunal is neither deterred nor disabled from reaching a proper
conclusion on the evidence that is available.
China’s reputation as a gross human rights abuser has not had a bearing on the Tribunal in reaching a
proper conclusion. The Tribunal has adopted a process for its work that safeguards an even-handed
approach to the Peoples Republic of China’s (PRC) interests. The Tribunal has requested contributions from
the PRC at every stage.
The Tribunal has considered evidence, in its many forms, and dealt with individual issues according to the
evidence relating to each issue and nothing else and thereby reached a series of conclusions that are free of
any influence caused by the PRC’s reputation or other potential causes of prejudice.
These were as follows;
 UER, Alm.del - 2024-25 - Bilag 8: Henvendelse af 17/12-24 fra Foreningen for Falun Dafa i Danmark om et internationalt dommertribunal om systematisk organhøst af politiske samvittighedsfanger i Kina
•
•
•
That there were extraordinarily short waiting times (promised by PRC doctors and hospitals) for
organs to be available for transplantation;
That there was torture of Falun Gong and Uyghurs;
That there was accumulated numerical evidence (excluding spurious PRC data) which indicated:
o
o
the number of transplant operations performed, and
the impossibility of there being anything like sufficient ‘eligible donors’ under the recently
formed PRC voluntary donor scheme for that number of transplant operations;
•
That there was a massive infrastructure development of facilities and medical personnel for organ
transplant operations, often started before any voluntary donor system was even planned;- That
there was direct and indirect evidence of forced organ harvesting.
These individual conclusions, when combined, led to the unavoidable final conclusion that;
Forced organ harvesting has been committed for years throughout China on a significant scale and that
Falun Gong practitioners have been one – and probably the main – source of organ supply. The concerted
persecution and medical testing of the Uyghurs is more recent and it may be that evidence of forced
organ harvesting of this group may emerge in due course. The Tribunal has had no evidence that the
significant infrastructure associated with China’s transplantation industry has been dismantled and
absent a satisfactory explanation as to the source of readily available organs concludes that forced organ
harvesting continues till today.
The Tribunal considered whether this constituted a crime of Genocide;
The Falun Gong and the Uyghurs in the PRC each qualify as a ‘group’ for purposes of the crime of Genocide.
For the Falun Gong, the following elements of the crime of Genocide are clearly established:
•
•
Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group.
Thus, bar one element of the crime, Genocide is, on the basis of legal advice received, clearly proved to the
satisfaction of the Tribunal.
The remaining element required to prove the crime is the very specific intent for Genocide.
Accepting legal advice about proving this intent, the Tribunal cannot be certain that the requisite intent is
proved and thus cannot be certain that Genocide itself is proved.
The Tribunal wishes to point out that specific intent does not necessarily make a crime of Genocide worse in
real wickedness than an individual Crime Against Humanity proved by the same set of facts.
The Tribunal notes that forced organ harvesting is of unmatched wickedness even compared – on a death
for death basis – with the killings by mass crimes committed in the last century. There is justifiable belief in
the minds of some or many – rising to probability or high probability – that Genocide has been committed.
In line with this, and by considering the evidence and the law, there can be no doubt that
there is a duty on
those who have the power to institute investigations for, and proceedings at, international courts or at
the UN to test whether Genocide has been committed.
They should act immediately to determine
accountability for any acts contrary to the provisions of the Genocide Convention.
Commission of Crimes Against Humanity against the Falun Gong and Uyghurs has been proved beyond
reasonable doubt
by proof of one or more of the following, legally required component acts:
 UER, Alm.del - 2024-25 - Bilag 8: Henvendelse af 17/12-24 fra Foreningen for Falun Dafa i Danmark om et internationalt dommertribunal om systematisk organhøst af politiske samvittighedsfanger i Kina
•
•
•
•
•
•
murder;
extermination;
imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of
international law;
torture;
rape or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
persecution on racial, national, ethnic, cultural or religious grounds that are universally recognised
as impermissible under international law; and
enforced disappearance.
in the course of a widespread and systematic attack or attacks against the Falun Gong and Uyghurs.
In regard to the Uyghurs the Tribunal had evidence of medical testing on a scale that could allow them,
amongst other uses, to become an ‘organ bank’. The world is already watching their interests and their
geographical location – although very large – may render it possible to lend them support more easily than
for the Falun Gong who are dispersed throughout the country.
Governments and international bodies must do their duty not only in regard to the possible charge of
Genocide but also in regard to Crimes against Humanity, which the Tribunal does not allow to be any less
heinous. Assuming they do not do their duty, the usually powerless citizen is, in the internet age, more
powerful than s/he may recognise. Criminality of this order may allow individuals from around the world to
act jointly in pressurising governments so that those governments and other international bodies are
unable
not
to act.
Governments and any who interact in any substantial way with the PRC including:
•
•
•
•
Doctors and medical institutions;
Industry, and businesses, most specifically airlines, travel companies, financial services businesses,
law firms and pharmaceutical and insurance companies together with individual tourists,
Educational establishments;
Arts establishments
DAFOH er en international organisation grundlagt af læger, med det formål, at få stoppet disse forbrydelser
mod menneskeheden, organhøst af levende mennesker for profit. I særdeleshed er Falun Gong den gruppe
af politiske forfulgte i Kina, der er udsat for denne nye form for ondskab på vores planet.
Set i lyset af forbrydelsens omfang, så har der været en foruroligende tavshed og absolut mangelfuld
proportionalitet. Betyder dette, at for at have en god samhandel med Kina, så vælger folkevalgte politikere
at lukke øjnene, for så går det jo nok over af sig selv? Når demonstranter i en lovlig anmeldt demonstration i
2012 på Højbroplads i København, ønskede at vise den daværende kinesiske delegation, at organhøst af
Falun Dafa-udøvere og andre var og er en forbrydelse, så blev vores demonstration forhindret. De
operationsansvarlige betjente sagde ligeud og pegede over mod folketinget, ”Beskeden kom derfra og vi er
uenige!” Det fortsat at ignorere så afgørende etiske problemer vil have fatale følger, og dette ikke kun få
Danmark men for hele den såkaldt frie vestlige verden! Hvad hvis det kinesiske styre udvikler en virus og
 UER, Alm.del - 2024-25 - Bilag 8: Henvendelse af 17/12-24 fra Foreningen for Falun Dafa i Danmark om et internationalt dommertribunal om systematisk organhøst af politiske samvittighedsfanger i Kina
2964756_0004.png
den slipper fri ved et uheld, kunne vi så blive ramt? Eller hvad hvis det kinesiske styre sponsorerede en krig
på europæisk jord?
I omkring 25 år har Foreningen for Falun Dafa forsøgt at advare danskere generelt, om hvilken ondskab der
er indeholdt i det kinesiske kommunistparti. Vi har sendt over 1000 mails og breve med det formål, at
fortælle sandheden om styret. Resultatet har ikke været tilfredsstillende for nogle af parterne, kun det
kinesiske styre er veltilfreds med jeres fortsatte tavshed.
I Kina er der 100 millioner Falun Dafa-udøvere som lever efter principperne, sandhed, medfølelse,
tolerance. Dette er vildt opmuntrende, at så mange mennesker under sådan et frygteligt styre stadig har
modet og viljen til at være og blive bedre mennesker!
En international organisation grundlagt af læger forsøger ligeledes at skabe opmærksomhed på disse
forbrydelser og få det stoppet. Her er et link
https://dafoh.org/
Med venlig hilsen
Foreningen for Falun Dafa i Danmark