Erhvervsudvalget 2023-24
ERU Alm.del Bilag 92
Offentligt
2805232_0001.png
Mairead McGuinness
Commissioner of Financial Stability, Financial Services and
Capital Markets Union
European Commission
MINISTER FOR INDUSTRY,
BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL
AFFAIRS
Response from the Danish Government to the Commission’s targeted
consultation on the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation
Dear Commissioner McGuinness,
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Commission’s public consultation
on the EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).
Denmark supports an ambitious approach to sustainable finance – a cornerstone
in the green transition and in supporting the EU’s commitment to the climate goals
of the Paris Agreement, the Montreal/Kunming Agreement, the United Nation’s
Sustainable Development Goals as well as other relevant environmental Conven-
tions. A part of this ambition is to continue to ensure the EU’s position as a global
front-runner and standard setter in sustainable finance.
Since its adoption, SFDR has played a crucial role in sustainable finance and has
increased the comparability and disclosures of financial products. SFDR has pro-
vided a framework and structure for enabling consumers and investors to make
informed investment decisions. However, regulatory and market developments
call for a revision of the regulation to make it fully fit for purpose and to support
capital flows to the green transition and sustainable development.
In the revision of SFDR, it is important to ensure that the sustainability-related
disclosures strengthen investor protection. The SFDR should support the preven-
tion of greenwashing, and it should allow investors to better compare the sustain-
ability profile of investment products. This will support investors' confidence in
the financial sector and provide investors with financial products that match the
investor’s needs and preferences.
Consistency across regulation and balance between benefits and burdens
It is important to ensure consistency across regulation. This should be a particular
focus in the SFDR review, as the sustainable finance legislation is quickly grow-
ing and a consistent framework is needed to support growth of green and sustain-
able capital flows. In this regard, ensuring consistency between the Corporate
Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Taxonomy and SFDR is of par-
ticular importance. It is important to find the right balance between investor pro-
tection and the need for credible data, on the one hand, and to avoid disclosure
MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY, BUSI-
NESS AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS
Slotsholmsgade 10-12
DK-1216 Copenhagen K
Tlf.
Fax
+45 33 92 33 50
+45 33 12 37 78
CVR-nr. 10 09 24 85
EAN nr. 5798000026001
[email protected]
www.em.dk
ERU, Alm.del - 2023-24 - Bilag 92: Orientering om regeringens svar på Kommissionens offentlige høring vedr. revision af SFDR (Disclosureforordningen)
2805232_0002.png
requirements, which do not create sufficiently added value for investors and con-
sumers, on the other hand. Further, clarity in the regulatory framework should be
set in basic acts (level 1), establishing central concepts and requirements at the
political level, and not in delegated acts (level 2) without proper framing and
guidance.
In this new and complex legal area, we urge the Commission to be mindful of
burdens associated with new regulation. It is in our view very important that ben-
efits and burdens of new regulation are balanced. Hence, we call on the Commis-
sion to conduct thorough impact assessments, including of the burdens. The cur-
rent principles and transparency requirements should remain.
Creating new financial product categories
Denmark agrees on the need for creating financial product categories for sustain-
ability with clearly defined minimum criteria. This will make it easier for inves-
tors to compare and trust the financial products, and it will ensure that financial
products making sustainability-related claims do in fact contribute to a sustainable
economy. When drafting the product categories it is of utmost importance that
small private investors are protected and not mislead by the information provided.
In our view, it is essential to build proper financial product categories based on
the existing concepts of SFDR such as “sustainable investments” and “principle
adverse impact indicators”. Moreover, we would suggest that the revision of
SFDR should include more specific requirement for Do No Significant Harm test,
transition finance and create a “social framework” to support a uniform applica-
tion of the regulation and to push ambitions and heighten the contributions from
the financial sector.
Transition finance as central aspect of sustainable finance
Finally, we wish to raise the importance of transition finance as a central aspect
of sustainable finance and a facilitating force towards investments in a sustainable
economy. In the revision of SFDR, we see a strong need to define both transition
investments and transition financial product categories. A clear distinction should
be made between those investments and financial products, which can be catego-
rised as already sustainable and those, which could support the green transition.
The transition should be credible and include milestones linked to global targets
– not only on climate, but also other environmental targets, including biodiversity
and potentially social goals.
We are at your disposal for any questions or comments that you might have, and
we look forward to a fruitful dialogue on these important issues.
Yours sincerely,
Morten Bødskov
Minister for Industry, Business,
and Financial Affairs
Magnus Heunicke
Minister for
Environment
Lars Aagaard
Minister for Climate,
Energy and Utilities
2