Europaudvalget 2022-23 (2. samling)
EUU Alm.del
Offentligt
MR. AUDUN HEGGELUND
NORWEGIAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (NEA)
P.O. Box 5672 Torgarden, N-7485 Trondheim, Norway.
Telephone: +47 73 58 05 00
Mr. Martijn Beekman
–
Netherlands
Dr. Mandy Lokaj - Germany
Ms. Jenny Ivarsson
–
Sweden
Mr. Toke Winther - Denmark
Brussels, 13 August 2021
RE: A possible PFAS REACH Restriction for F-Gas uses in the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and
refrigeration (HVACR) sector
–
2
nd
Stakeholder Consultation.
Dear Mr. Heggelund,
The co-signatories of this letter have noted with interest the publication of the Registry of Intention (RoI)
on 15 July 2021 and the following new Call for Evidence (CfE) process as launched on 19 July 2021 by
Norway and the other 4 Dossier Submitters of the joint initiative on the PFAS REACH restriction.
From the
Summary Report
published by the 5 Member States (MSs), we understand that the assessment
held in the context of F-Gases include a list of applications using hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),
perfluorocarbons (PFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), unsaturated hydro(chloro)fluorocarbons
(HFOs and
HCFOs),
hydrofluoroethers (HFEs), fluoroketones (FKs) and other fluorinated compounds,
either alone or in blend forms.
We also understand that a more specific list of the F-Gas substances examined by Norway, identified as
being of
“commercial
use”, are indicated in Appendix I
(page 15 and 16 of the Summary Report).
Appendix
I shows 10 different HFCs currently being used, 11 HFOs (several of which are isomers), 2 FKs, 4 HFEs, 13
HFC & HFC/non-F-gas blends, and 9 HFC/HFO blends.
However, the
Report
that Exponent International Ltd. published on 14 July 2021 on the Norwegian
Environment Agency (NEA) website, concerning the application of F-Gases in the European Economic
Area, proposes a partially different list of PFASs. We would also like to highlight that the abovementioned
Summary Report accompanying the CfE is based on a PFAS definition of 2020, consequently creating
confusion and misalignment between the RoI and the new CfE scope. Such misalignments can be
identified throughout the new CfE process, specifically when discussing about tonnages and expected
trends, emissions, and on non-PFAS alternatives, for instance.
1