Skatteudvalget 2022-23 (2. samling)
SAU Alm.del Bilag 144
Offentligt
Danish Ministry of Taxation
28 February 2023
File no.2022-14976
Request for a written statement on the interpretation
of article 28 of the VAT Directive
1. Background
In its judgment of 21 January 2021 in case C-501/19, UCMR-ADA, the ECJ dealt with
the application of the VAT Directive
1
when collective management organisations collect,
in their own name but on behalf of holders of copyright, royalties from end users.
In the answer to question 2, the ECJ concluded:
“Article
28 of the [VAT Directive] must be interpreted as meaning that a collective
management organisation which collects, in its own name but on behalf of holders of
copyright in musical works, royalties due to them in consideration for the authorisa-
tion for the public performance of their protected works, acts as a ‘taxable person’
within the meaning of that provision and is therefore deemed to have received the ser-
vices in question from those rights holders before providing them to the end user it-
self. In such a case, that organisation is required to issue invoices in its own name to
the end user containing the royalties collected from the latter, including value added
tax (VAT). The copyright holders are, in turn, required to issue to the collective man-
agement organisation invoices including VAT for the services supplied in respect of
the royalties received.”
The present note deals with the consequences of the judgment in a Danish context.
As regards the VAT treatment of copyright holders, Denmark applies the derogation in
Annex X, Part B, which allows States which were members of the Community on 1 Janu-
ary 1978 to continue to exempt the supply of services
2
by authors, artists, and performers.
The exemption is applicable, when authors, artists and performers supply rights to use
copyrights on their artistic works directly to an end user. The judgment in case C-501/19,
UCMR-ADA, clearly does not affect the right to continue applying this stand still-deroga-
tion to the services supplied by those persons.
Prior to the judgment in case C-501/19, UCMR-ADA, the Danish tax authorities consid-
ered the services provided by collective management organisations to end users not to
have been provided by “taxable persons”, and therefore did not
require VAT to be
charged on the royalties paid by the end users.
Office:
VAT, Indirect Taxes and Customs
Initials:
1
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1),
as amended by Council Directive 2010/88/EU of 7 December 2010 (OJ 2010 L 326, p. 1).
With the exception of the specific services enumerated in Annex X, Part B (1)(a-i).
2