REVIEWS
Environmental factors in declining
human fertility
Niels E. Skakkebæk
1,2,3
✉
, Rune Lindahl-Jacobsen
4
, Hagai Levine
5
,
Anna-Maria Andersson
1,2
, Niels Jørgensen
1,2
, Katharina M. Main
1,2,3
,
Øjvind Lidegaard
3,6
, Lærke Priskorn
1,2
, Stine A. Holmboe
1,2
, Elvira V. Bräuner
Kristian Almstrup
1,2
, Luiz R. Franca
7
, Ariana Znaor
8
, Andreas Kortenkamp
Roger J. Hart
10,11
and Anders Juul
1,2,3
1,2
9
,
,
Abstract | A severe decline in child births has occurred over the past half century, which will lead
to considerable population declines, particularly in industrialized regions. A crucial question is
whether this decline can be explained by economic and behavioural factors alone, as suggested
by demographic reports, or to what degree biological factors are also involved. Here, we discuss
data suggesting that human reproductive health is deteriorating in industrialized regions.
Widespread infertility and the need for assisted reproduction due to poor semen quality and/or
oocyte failure are now major health issues. Other indicators of declining reproductive health
include a worldwide increasing incidence in testicular cancer among young men and alterations
in twinning frequency. There is also evidence of a parallel decline in rates of legal abortions,
revealing a deterioration in total conception rates. Subtle alterations in fertility rates were
already visible around 1900, and most industrialized regions now have rates below levels required
to sustain their populations. We hypothesize that these reproductive health problems are par-
tially linked to increasing human exposures to chemicals originating directly or indirectly from
fossil fuels. If the current infertility epidemic is indeed linked to such exposures, decisive regula-
tory action underpinned by unconventional, interdisciplinary research collaborations will be
needed to reverse the trends.
Are human populations living in industrialized regions at
risk of a catastrophic decline? With anthropogenic (that
is, caused by humans or their activities, such as emission
of greenhouse gases) climate change firmly placed on the
global agenda, there is increasing concern that human
populations (alongside those of many other species) are
at risk, unless drastic adjustments are implemented to
ensure more sustainable living. What is less evident on
sustainable development agendas, however, is that more
than half of all humans presently live in areas of the world
where birth rates have persistently declined below the lev-
els necessary to reproduce and sustain their populations
1
(Fig. 1)
. Transnational migration has historically had a role
in the ebb and flow of population change, and rising life
expectancy has tempered population declines in many
places
1
. However, with birth rates having dropped below
one per woman in some East Asian countries/regions
2
, it
is imperative that we understand why, how and with what
consequences ongoing fertility declines are taking place.
Of note, the word ‘fertility’ has two meanings in mod-
ern literature. Although it can sometimes be confusing,
the proper meaning is usually evident from the context
in which the word is being used. In demography, fertil-
ity is defined as the number of children (for example,
low fertility equals low fertility rates) and in biology,
fertility is defined as fecundity, or the ability to repro-
duce. In addition, the term fertility rate is often used
synonymously with total fertility rate (TFR; the average
number of live births a woman would have by the age
of 50 years if she were subject throughout her life to the
age-specific fertility rates observed in a given year; its
calculation assumes that there is no mortality) or the
general fertility rate per 1,000 persons (that is, the num-
ber of births in a year divided by the number of women
aged 15–44 years times 1,000).
The underlying causes of the current unsustaina-
ble fertility rates are unclear; however, demographic
research has provided some evidence of socioeconomic
causes
3
, which have been investigated in two large inter-
national studies
1,4
. A crucial and unanswered question
is, however, whether fecundity (the biological ability to
conceive) is indeed constant (as generally indicated in
✉
e-mail:
Niels.Erik.Skakkebaek@
regionh.dk
https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41574-021-00598-8
Nature reviews
|
Endocrinology
0123456789();: