Retsudvalget 2021-22
REU Alm.del Bilag 24
Offentligt
Information on the implementation of certain
recommendations presented by the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
in the concluding observations on the sixth periodic
report of Denmark
Due date of follow-up report: October 2021
Denmark
1
REU, Alm.del - 2021-22 - Bilag 24: Danmarks midtvejsrapport til FN’s Komité for Økonomiske, Sociale og Kulturelle Rettigheder, fra udenrigsministeren
Part I
............................................................................................................................ 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3
Selected recommendations for follow-up ..................................................................... 3
Part II
........................................................................................................................... 3
A. Follow-up information relating to paragraph 13 of the concluding observations
(E/C.12/DNK/CO/6) .................................................................................................... 3
Retrogressive measures
refugees and migrants ........................................................ 3
Follow-up information ............................................................................................ 3
B. Follow-up information relating to paragraph 17 of the concluding observations
(E/C.12/DNK/CO/6) .................................................................................................... 4
National human rights institution ............................................................................... 4
Follow-up information ............................................................................................ 4
C. Follow-up information relating to paragraph 19 of the concluding observations
(E/C.12/DNK/CO/6) .................................................................................................... 4
Business and human rights ....................................................................................... 4
Follow-up information ............................................................................................ 4
2
REU, Alm.del - 2021-22 - Bilag 24: Danmarks midtvejsrapport til FN’s Komité for Økonomiske, Sociale og Kulturelle Rettigheder, fra udenrigsministeren
2463996_0003.png
Part I
Introduction
The present report is submitted in accordance with the procedure on follow-up to concluding
observations adopted by the Committee. The report has been compiled by the Danish
Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the basis of contributions from relevant departments and
ministries of the Government of Denmark as well as the Faroe Islands.
The report is based on and structured in accordance with the CESCR note on the procedure
for follow-up to concluding observations
1
.
Selected recommendations for follow-up
The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted its concluding observations
on the sixth report of Denmark at the examination held on 8
th
-9
th
October 2019. In paragraph
77 of the concluding observations the Committee requested the State party to provide, within
24 months of the adoption of the concluding observations, information on the implementation
of the recommendations contained in paragraphs 13 (retrogressive measures), 17 (national
human rights institution in the Faroe Islands) and 19 (business and human rights).
Denmark hereby provides additional information on the implementation of the
recommendations as requested by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Part II
A. Follow-up information relating to paragraph 13 of the
concluding observations (E/C.12/DNK/CO/6)
Retrogressive measures
refugees and migrants
“13. The Committee recommends that, in the implementation of the new political agreement
entitled “Fair Direction for Denmark”, the State party reverse the retrogressive measures
taken that do not meet the criteria of necessity, proportionality temporariness and non-
discrimination, which are elaborated in the Committee’s 2012 letter on austerity measures.).“
Follow-up information
The agreement “A fair direction for Denmark” referred
to by the committee is a political
agreement prepared by a group of political parties represented in the Danish parliament,
including the Government party (the Social Democratic Party) and the parties forming the
parliamentary basis for the Government.
In general, the Government pursues its policies in full accordance with Denmark’s
international obligations, including the principles of necessity and proportionality. Any
derogating measure will be temporary in nature and will only be applied for the period
1
Follow-up to concluding observations (ohchr.org)
3
REU, Alm.del - 2021-22 - Bilag 24: Danmarks midtvejsrapport til FN’s Komité for Økonomiske, Sociale og Kulturelle Rettigheder, fra udenrigsministeren
necessary to counter the emergency situation. The Government also pursues that Danish
legislation is adapted in accordance with Denmark’s international obligations.
Furthermore, the Government attaches great importance to combatting discrimination. All
citizens are equal before the law, and public authorities must not discriminate citizens on any
ground.
The principles of proportionality and equality before the law are also fundamental
principles in Danish administrative law.
B. Follow-up information relating to paragraph 17 of the
concluding observations (E/C.12/DNK/CO/6)
National human rights institution
“17.
The Committee recommends that the State party expedite the establishment of a human
rights institution mandate for the Faroe Islands, with a full mandate in relation to Covenant
rights, and that is compliant with the Paris Principles).“
Follow-up information
The Government of the Faroe Islands continues the work on looking at feasible solutions
for the establishment of a human rights institution for the Faroe Islands with a full mandate
in relation to Covenant rights, and that is compliant with the Paris Principles.
C. Follow-up information relating to paragraph 19 of the
concluding observations (E/C.12/DNK/CO/6)
Business and human rights
“19.
The Committee recommends that the State party adopt a legal and other regulatory
framework which:
(a) Requires business entities to exercise human rights due diligence in their operations and
in their business relationships, at home and abroad;
(b) Holds business entities liable for violations of economic, social and cultural rights; and
(c) Enables victims to seek remedies through judicial and non-judicial mechanisms in the
State party.
Follow-up information
Reply to recommendation 19 (a, b, and c)
The Danish Government is committed to seeing that Danish business entities respect
international human rights in their operations and in their business relationships, both at home
and abroad. Denmark has adopted international guidelines within this area, including the UN
Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for
Multinational Enterprises. While these guidelines are non-binding, Danish businesses are
encouraged to respect them.
4
REU, Alm.del - 2021-22 - Bilag 24: Danmarks midtvejsrapport til FN’s Komité for Økonomiske, Sociale og Kulturelle Rettigheder, fra udenrigsministeren
Denmark strongly supports the
European Commission’s initiative to introduce a legislative
proposal on mandatory due diligence. EU legislation on mandatory due diligence will ensure
that companies in all Member States contribute to sustainable and responsible business
conduct by describing possible risks of their adverse impacts on e.g. human rights and labour
rights issues, and on that basis take steps to address the risks. Implementing risk-based due
diligence processes is key for a responsible supply chain management in accordance with the
UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the ILO Tripartite Declaration of
Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy, and the OECD
Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
The Danish Government believes that common EU legislation on due diligence is necessary
to avoid varying national legislation, which creates unnecessary confusion concerning rules
and obligations for businesses as well as affected parties. The Danish Government expects
EU legislation on due diligence to contribute to common requirements and expectations, as
well as strengthened sustainable and responsible business conduct across EU member states.
The Danish Government has actively worked for the European Commission to carry out
analysis of EU legislation and national legal requirements on due diligence, including
examination of the possibilities for appeals and compensation under both EU and national
auspices, as well as an evaluation of the need for additional legal requirements. Denmark
awaits a legislative proposal by the European Commission later this year and is actively
engaged in preparatory consultations.
In this context, the national OECD contact point (NCP Denmark) will be evaluated.
Denmark has instituted the national OECD contact point (NCP Denmark) by law. NCP
Denmark, also known as the Mediation and Complaints-Handling Institution for Responsible
Business Conduct, is responsible for raising awareness of the OECD Guidelines for
Multinational Enterprises and dealing with complaints regarding non-observance of the
guidelines by Danish companies, public authorities, and civil society organizations.
NCP Denmark is a non-judicial entity. NCP Denmark can issue statements regarding specific
instances and perform mediation between parties. Experience shows that NCP Denmark’s
statements have led the accused companies to subsequently comply with NCP Denmark’s
recommendations in terms of respecting international guidelines.
The Danish Government believes that issues regarding remedy should be addressed at EU
level to avoid varying national legislation, which creates unnecessary confusion concerning
rules and expectations for businesses as well as victims of economic, social, and cultural
violations. The Danish Government has in several instances called upon the European
Commission to carry out analyses of due diligence legislation, including the possibilities for
victims to seek remedy through judicial and non-judicial mechanisms. Denmark awaits a
legislative proposal by the European Commission later this year.
5