Ligestillingsudvalget 2020-21
B 80 Bilag 5
Offentligt
Aarhus 09.05.2021
Til Ligestillingsudvalget
Vedr. B 80 Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om, at regeringen pålægges ikke at indføre en ret til juridisk
kønsskifte for børn
Som angivet I mit brev af 8. maj 2021 skal jeg hermed følge op med supplerende spørgsmål, som jeg håber,
Ligestillingsudvalget vil foreligge ministeren.
Følgende fremgår af side 25
– 27 i boge ”Irreversible Da age –
Teenage Girls and the Transgender Craze”
af Shrier, udgivet 2020 af Swift Press:
I
, Lisa Litt a , o
-gyn turned public health researcher and mother of two, was scrolling through
social media when she noticed a statistical peculiarity: several adolescents, most of them girls, from her
small town in Rhode Island had come out as transgender
all from within the same
frie d group. With the
first t o a ou e e ts, I thought, Wo , that s great, Dr. Litt a said, a light Ne Jerse a e t
tweaking her vowels. Then came announcements three, four, five, and six.
Dr. Littman knew almost nothing about gender dysphoria
her research interests had been
confined to reproductive health: abortion, stigma and contraception. But she knew enough to recognize that
the u ers ere u h higher tha e ta t pre ale e data ould ha e predi ted. I studied epide iolog
… a d he ou see u ers that greatl e eed our e pe tatio s, it s orth it to look at hat ight e
ausi g it. Ma e it s a differe e of ho ou re ou ti g. It ould e a lot of thi gs. But ou k o , those
ere high u ers.
In fact, they turned out to be unprecedented. In America and across the Western world,
adolescents were reporting a sudden spike in gender dysphoria
the medical condition associated with the
so ial desig atio tra sge der . Bet ee
a d
the u er of ge der surgeries for atal
females
in the U.S. quadrupled, with biological women suddenly accounting for
as we have seen
70 percent of all
gender surgeries. In 2018, the UK reported a 4,400 percent rise over the previous decade in teenage girls
seeking gender treatments. In Canada, Sweden, Finland, and the UK, clinicians and gender therapists began
reporting a sudden and dramatic shift in the demographics of those presenting with gender dysphoria
from predominantly preschool-aged boys to predominantly adolescent girls.
Dr. Litt
a s uriosit s agged o the so ial edia posts she d see . Wh ould a
psychological ailment that had been almost exclusively the province of boys suddenly befall teenage girls?
And why would the incidence of gender dysphoria be so much higher in friend clusters?
Maybe she had missed something. She immersed herself in the scientific literature on gender
dysphoria. She needed to understand the nature, presentation, and common treatment of this disorder.
Dr. Littman began preparing a study of her own, gathering data from parents of trans-
identifying adolescents who had had no childhood history of gender dysphoria. The lack of childhood history
was critical; as we have seen, traditional gender dysphoria typically begins in early childhood. That was true
especially for the small number of natal girls who presented with it. Dr. Littman wanted to know whether
what she was seeing was a new variant on an old affliction or something else entirely. She assembled 256
detailed parent reports and analyzed the data. Her results astonished her.
Two patterns stood out: First, the clear majority (65 percent) of the adolescent girls who had
discovered transgender identity in adolescence
– out of the lue –
had done so after a period of prolonged
1
B 80 - 2020-21 - Bilag 5: Henvendelser af 8/5-2021 og 9/5-2021 fra Jacob Georg Naur
2390679_0002.png
social media immersion.
Se o d, the pre ale e of tra sge der ide tifi atio
groups was more than seventy times the expected rate. Why?
ithi so e of the girls frie d
Dr. Littman knew that a spike in transgender identification among adolescent girls might be
explained by one of several causes. Increased societal acceptance of LGBTQ members might have allowed
tee agers ho ould ha e ee relu ta t to o e out i earlier eras to do so toda , for e a ple. But this
did not explain why transgender identification was sharply clustered in friend groups. Perhaps people with
gender dysphoria naturally gravitated towards one another.
Then again, the rates were so high, the age of onset had increased from preschool-aged to
adolescents, and the sex ratio had flipped. The atypical nature of this dysphoria
occurring in adolescents
with no childhood history of it
nudged Dr. Littman toward a hypothesis everyone else had overlooked:
peer o tagio . Dr. Litt a ga e this at pi al e pressio of ge der d sphoria a a e: rapid-onset
gender
d sphoria ROGD .
I lyset af ovenstående ønsker jeg, at Ligestillingsudvalget hører ministeren om følgende praksis fra den
gældende vejledning er hensigtsmæssig:
https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2018/K%C3%B8nsidentitetsforhold/Vejledning-om-
sundhedsfaglig-hj%C3%A6lp-ved-
k%C3%B8nsidentitetsforhold.ashx?la=da&hash=3B9ACDB8D28D200B2E09F9111AD04C0E35487D9F
Er sundhedspersonalet klædt tilstrækkeligt godt på til at kunne skelne mellem rigtige og forkerte tilfælde?
Har ministeriet ikke netop afskåret sig fra at kunne sortere modefænomenstilfælde fra ved at vejlede
personalet som ovenfor.
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/politikere-i-vildrede-om-hormonbehandling-til-boern-et-frygteligt-
dilemma
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/viden/kroppen/aendringer-i-samfundet-faar-flere-transkoennede-til-soege-
behandling
2
B 80 - 2020-21 - Bilag 5: Henvendelser af 8/5-2021 og 9/5-2021 fra Jacob Georg Naur
2390679_0003.png
Har man ikke derved skabt en fejl i sundhedssystemets behandlingstilbud, som hver dag antagelig koster
børn deres kønslige førlighed?
Hvordan vil ministeren, evt. sammen med sundhedsministeren, få rettet op på fejlen?
Juridisk kønsskifte til børn skal ikke være tilladt, da det ville være at putte flere mink ned i det samme
forkerte hul. Juridisk kønsskifte til børn bør ikke være tilladt af den enkle årsag, at hormonbehandling til
børn bør være forbudt.
Hormonbehandling til børn bør under alle omstændigheder være forbudt, da ministerierne har vejledt
sundhedspersonalet forkert på nuværende tidspunkt set i forhold til de nyere resultater, som forskningen
er kommet frem til.
Og det er jo ikke fordi hormonbehandling skal stoppes for alle. Her er netop et eksempel, som er mere
normalt, da hendes symptomer startede tidligt (og ikke inde på teenageværelset på baggrund af
Youtubevideoer),
og da hu tydeligvis ”blot” er lesbisk:
https://www.dr.dk/mitliv/hele-sit-liv-havde-jalal-foelt-sig-fanget-i-den-forkerte-krop-foerst-da-han-
maerkede
Da hun var blevet voksen, kunne hun fint få hormoner og en topoperation, hvor brysterne fjernes. Det er
disse tilfælde, som er OK og ROGD, der IKKE er ok. Og det kræver altså, at man kan spørge meget mere ind
til livssituationen og udfordre denne og ikke blot acceptere, hvad der bliver sagt.
At kunne redegøre for sit liv og at kunne træffe valg, der binder resten af livet, skal under ingen
omstændigheder overlades til børn og unge under 18 år.
Som et obiter dictum ville jeg udstede et moratorium fsva. hormonbehandling til børn allerede i dag.
Forældrene bør informeres om de nye retningslinjer under hensyntagen til ROGD samt tilbydes rådgivning
og hjælp til at håndtere barnets hormonnedtrapning samt evt. modtage erstatning for patientskade.
Jeg forbeholder mig ret til at stille flere spørgsmål til Ligestillingsudvalget samt fremkomme med
bemærkninger til eventuelle svar fra Ligestillingsudvalget eller ministeren
3
B 80 - 2020-21 - Bilag 5: Henvendelser af 8/5-2021 og 9/5-2021 fra Jacob Georg Naur
Vh Jacob Naur
4