Udenrigsudvalget 2020-21
URU Alm.del Bilag 234
Offentligt
2410964_0001.png
Parliamentary Forum at the United Nations
High-level Political Forum
on sustainable development (HLPF)
Message from the pandemic: Bring “government” back
Monday, 12 July 2021
9:00
11:00 EST (New York)
English, French and Spanish interpretation
Online registration by 8 July at
https://form.jotform.com/211393642879163
Is an implicit message of the COVID-19 pandemic that government
the
public authority
consisting of the
executive, parliament, the judiciary and the public administration
must play a more pro-active role in the
economy and in society?
Over the last few decades, governments have progressively abandoned their traditional
“interventionist”
posture out of concerns that excessive control of the economy might interfere with market forces which,
left to their own devices, were supposed to always lead to a more optimal allocation of benefits and
rewards throughout society. The competitive ethos of the private sector was said to be the key driver of
innovation, investments, and technological developments. The solution to problems such as poverty and
environmental degradation was more likely to come from the internal dynamics of the marketplace than
from state laws and regulations.
Driven by this belief, almost everywhere in the world, governments worked to liberalize the economy and
deregulate the marketplace. Public infrastructure and services were sold or subcontracted to private
sector actors through public-private partnerships. Trickle-down economics promoting low taxes and
budget austerity replaced pro-active income and fiscal policies. Government rules to protect workers and
the environment were loosened. National industrial policies were dismantled on the assumption that
government should not pick
“winners”
but leave it to companies to decide what and where to produce.
Capital controls were lifted to enable foreign investments and global supply chains to take advantage of
more profitable production conditions anywhere in the world. The doctrine of
free
trade based on nations’
comparative advantages prevailed over
fair
trade practices to protect the environment, workers and
consumers.
The emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019 and the ensuing global pandemic have disrupted this
common narrative. Caught unprepared to deal with such a crisis, almost overnight, many governments
rediscovered their own authority and took immediate action to stem the threat to human life and forestall
economic collapse.
In response to the pandemic, unprecedented government borrowing to rescue private companies, provide
emergency health care, and strengthen welfare entitlements took place in many countries despite
“market
URU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 234: Invitation til High Level Political Forum den 12. juli 2021
fundamentals”
normally averse to rising levels of public debt. Some countries have begun to reconsider
their global value chains to repatriate the production of essential goods, services and staples out of
national security concerns and in response to public demands. Long-standing proposals for a new global
tax regime that demands more of corporations and of the financial sector, including the closure of tax
havens, are gaining ground. Healthcare budgets have been replenished with the promise of more public
investments to protect the health and wellbeing of people. In countries around the world, green economy
solutions feature a decidedly more activist government role to steer investments and regulate the private
sector. Government-led industrial strategies are gaining new currency in both developed and developing
countries. The market-rigging power of growing monopolies in technology, the service and financial
sectors is increasingly being challenged. Wherever possible, public administrations are being retooled
with new skills and new mandates to better implement laws and regulations. A growing number of
governments are demanding a waiver of patent rights on COVID-19 vaccines on public health grounds.
In sum, the strong government response to the pandemic has shown that far from being an obstacle to
development, government is key to creating the conditions for human progress. The pandemic has
highlighted that the ceding of government authority to market imperatives in years past was more the
result of a
political choice
than of
government’s
inherent inability to regulate the economy and generally
play a more pro-active role to satisfy human needs and protect the environment.
All this being said, the question today is whether this apparent repositioning of government vis-à-vis the
marketplace is a long-term global trend or a temporary break from the status quo. Certainly, not all
policy-makers have heard this particular message of the pandemic in the same way, and many remain
skeptical about the message nevertheless. Globally, the picture is uneven with governments in developed
countries
much better endowed with resources to play this more pro-active role
than in developing
countries. In many public policy areas, market forces and private sector players continue to have the
upper hand in setting the economic agenda. Far from being affected by the pandemic, the financialization
of the global economy has continued unabated with new speculative bubbles and risky bets.
Yet, more pro-active public policies supported by laws and budgets will be needed to recover the lost
ground in the implementation of the SDGs by 2030. A key step toward
“building
back
better”
in response
to the pandemic calls for a hard look at how parliament and indeed government as a whole need to be
engaged more pro-actively in the management of the economy and of society going forward.
The
main segment
of this
year’s
Parliamentary Forum will therefore revolve around the following
questions:
o
o
o
o
How can parliaments help redefine the relationship between the government-led public sector
and the market-led private sector? Is rebalancing needed?
Should parliaments support more expansive fiscal policies to respond to growing demands for
education, health care and other public goods?
What steps can parliaments take to curb financialization and reduce the dominance of large
monopolies in all sectors of the economy?
What institutional reforms should parliaments promote to make government more resilient and
better able to respond to the needs of the people?
A
second segment
of the Forum will feature a presentation of the preliminary results of this
year’s
IPU
survey questionnaire addressed to parliaments of the 44 countries presenting Voluntary National
Reviews.
URU, Alm.del - 2020-21 - Bilag 234: Invitation til High Level Political Forum den 12. juli 2021
2410964_0003.png
Provisional programme
09:00 EST
o
Opening
Mr. Duarte Pacheco, President of the IPU
09:10 EST
o
o
o
o
Discussion of the main theme
Mr. Pedro Arroio-Agudo, UN Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water
and sanitation, former Member of Parliament (Spain) (invited)
Ms. Isabel Ortiz, Director, Global Social Justice Program, Columbia University (invited)
Member of parliament (developed country)
Member of parliament (developing countries)
The presentations will be followed by a moderated discussion between participating parliamentarians and
the panellists. Participants can pose questions live or via event chat.
10:30 EST
o
o
o
2021 survey of parliamentary engagement in the VNRs
Mr. Martin Chungong, IPU Secretary General
Mr. Alessandro Motter, Senior Advisor for economic and social affairs, IPU
Member of parliament (from among survey participants)
Interactive discussion with participants.
10:55 EST
Closing
For more information, please write to
[email protected]