Franklinstraat
1000 Brussels
106-108
Belgium
T + 32 2 735 83 96
F + 32 2 735 84 66
Mr. Peter Mandelson
European Commissioner for External Trade
200 rue de la Loi
1049 Brussels
~:
02 298 86 57
Brussels, 12thJuly 2006
Ref. nr.: 06.32221
Dear Commissioner,
As Chairman ofPA International I am writing to you with reference to your impressive
performance at last week's EU-China Trade and Investment conference and your clear
message for the need to strike a "grand bargain" between Europe and China. Whilst much
of the conference focussed on the difficulties of doing business in China there are a number
of additional concerns brought to my attention by industry in recent weeks, which I believe
should also be considered within the framework of the new EU-China Framework
Agreement. I trust that the insights and experiences of my colleagues and I as detailed
herewith will assist you and your team in this difficult a.nd challenging task. I should like to
note that we are fully at your disposal for any further information or assistance you require.
Of course none ofus can overlook the impressive developments in China in the last
decades. Their unfaltering growth has propelled them from 30th in global exporters league
in the 1970s to 3rd place today. More important than the economics are the social elements
such as managing the largest reduction in poverty in human history , a model to be learnt
from. Whilst discussions on the future of democracy in China will continue, the EU is
correct to be thinking about the longer-term and the implications for trade and economic
relations.
In the West we are increasingly aware of and sometimes disturbed by the growing
economic clout of China. With Chinese growth rates consistently above nine percent, there
are perceptions of China taking jobs, deliberately keeping the yuan undervalued by pegging
it to the dollar, of exporting deflation by selling its products abroad at unfair prices, of
violating the rights of its workers to keep labour costs low, and of failing to meet its
commitments to the World Trade Organization. I am certain that many of these elements
will and have been addressed and detailed by other interlocutors and thus take the liberty to