Transportudvalget 2019-20
TRU Alm.del Bilag 63
Offentligt
2103794_0001.png
Climate friendly asphalt
Demonstration project
Dato
Sagsbehandler
Mail
Telefon
Dokument
Side
15. august 2019
Matteo Pettinari
[email protected]
+45 7244 7139
18/05744-10
Vejdirektoratet
Guldalderen 12
2640 Hedehusene
Telefon +45 7244 3333
[email protected]
vejdirektoratet.dk
SE 60729018
EAN 5798000893450
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0002.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Climate friendly asphalt pavement
demonstration project
Authors:
Matteo Pettinari,
[email protected],
Danish Road Directorate
Christian Axelsen,
[email protected],
Danish Road Directorate
Erik Nielsen,
[email protected],
Danish Road Directorate
Michael Ruben Anker Larsen,
[email protected],
Danish Road Directorate
Jørn Raaberg,
[email protected],
Danish Road Directorate
Finn Thøgersen,
[email protected],
Danish Road Directorate
Date:
August 2019
ISBN (web)
To be defined
ISBN:
To be defined
Copyright:
© Vejdirektoratet, 2018
Carsten Niebuhrs Gade 43
1577 Copenhagen
Phone: +45 7244 3333
E-mail: [email protected]
www.vd.dk
2
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0003.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
List of Contents
Summary and conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 5
Description of rolling resistance optimised asphalt in tender documents ............................................... 7
KVS tendering process and specifications ........................................................................................... 7
Production quality control .............................................................................................................................. 9
Material characteristics and fulfilment of requirements ........................................................................ 9
Sampling and delivery control data ....................................................................................................... 9
Traditional asphalt data....................................................................................................................... 11
Mechanical properties and characteristics of the asphalt materials ................................................... 15
Durability test performed at Ulster University ............................................................................................ 19
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 19
Change in texture depth due to simulated trafficking and percentage of mass loss .......................... 20
Construction quality control......................................................................................................................... 22
Thermal analysis: method description ................................................................................................ 23
Algorithm development ....................................................................................................................... 23
Analysis of the thermal data collected during the construction of the KVS sections .......................... 25
Quality control using functional measurements .................................................................................. 27
Analysis of the functional properties .......................................................................................................... 30
Surface characteristics measured in April 2019 ................................................................................. 34
Noise measurements on KVS pavements .......................................................................................... 36
Evaluation of the KVS noise spectra compared to SRS and standard SMA pavement ..................... 38
Expected KVS Noise mechanism and development .......................................................................... 39
Measuring Rolling Resistance and Fuel consumption .............................................................................. 42
Description of the TUG trailer ............................................................................................................. 42
Temperature Correction Factor .......................................................................................................... 43
Rolling Resistance measurements ..................................................................................................... 43
Fuel consumption measurements ....................................................................................................... 46
Potential for CO2 reduction based on surface characteristics ................................................................ 50
Economic perspectives of paving KVS ....................................................................................................... 53
Socio-economic analysis .................................................................................................................... 53
Economic implementation analyses ................................................................................................... 56
Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................... 58
References ..................................................................................................................................................... 62
Annex A
Annex B
Description of requirements (intended goal) for the asphalt material for the
Requirements in tendering document for motorway M30 (Entreprise 79) ............................ 68
demonstration trials ...................................................................................................................................... 64
Annex C Overview table of bituminous binders ......................................................................................... 75
Annex D Overview table of asphalt materials ............................................................................................. 77
Annex E Metodebeskrivelse for termografisk måling - UDKAST ............................................................. 79
Introduktion ......................................................................................................................................... 79
Begrebsforklaring ................................................................................................................................ 80
3
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0004.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Udstyr .................................................................................................................................................. 81
Kameraspecifikationer ........................................................................................................................ 81
Andet udstyr ........................................................................................................................................ 81
Kalibrering, kontrol .............................................................................................................................. 81
Registrering af data............................................................................................................................. 82
Analyse ............................................................................................................................................... 83
Rapportering af resultater ................................................................................................................... 83
4
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0005.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Summary and conclusions
The Danish Road Directorate (DRD) received a grant from Den Grønne Pulje of 3.1 Mio DKK to take the
recently optimized Climate Friendly Asphalt (KVS) to a demonstration phase. The project objective was to
upscale the construction of pavements with low rolling resistance characteristics in order to demonstrate and
evaluate benefits and challenges related to this new mix type.
The project was structured in different Work Packages (WPs):
-
-
-
-
-
-
WP1 - Identification of sections for energy efficient pavements;
WP2 - Description of rolling resistance optimised asphalt in tender documents;
WP3 - Production quality control;
WP4 - Construction quality control;
WP5 - Pavements functional characteristics;
WP6 - Measuring Rolling Resistance and Fuel consumption.
Four different test sections were paved by four different contractors. KVS specifications were given by the
DRD based on the European product standard EN13108-5:2016 plus additional features. All the produced
mixtures and relative binders were tested to evaluate how different mixture ingredients and productions type
were impacting the expected KVS properties. Paving operations were monitored and recorded using tem-
perature control. This decision was taken because the experience, gained during the optimization of this
material type, has shown that the construction phase has a very strong impact on the functional properties of
the finished layer.
All finished KVS pavements were monitored to verify that the expected requirements and properties were
met. All fundamental functional properties such as texture, friction, roughness and noise were measured by
the DRD. Rolling Resistance and Fuel consumption were also measured to verify the final effectiveness of
the obtained properties.
In general, the project has shown that KVS asphalt has long lasting texture with reduced Rolling Resistance
and fuel consumption properties. Noise reduction of a KVS pavement does not differ significantly from
standard SMA8 but it is expected to last longer over time due to the enhanced durability and stability of the
texture.
Based on the present demonstration project the following results have been found:
-
Expected CO
2
reductions, averaged over a pavement life span of 17 years, are approx. 1.5% and
1.1% respectively compared to standard SMA 11 and SMA8 (Table 18);
-
-
Durability of the KVS pavements is comparable to standard SMA11 (expected life time is 17 years);
Noise reduction of the KVS is similar to standard SMA8 but it is expected to last longer due to the
long-lasting properties; 2 dB noise reduction goal was met only on M30 (Table 14). On the other test
sites some challenges were faced during paving.
5
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0006.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
-
Quality of the paving operations have a strong influence on the quality of the finished layer. It is rec-
ommended to investigate further the possibility of using thermal analysis during paving.
Most of the contractors have found this pavement type difficult to pave compared to standard pavement
types and some minor adjustments have been commonly identified to facilitate paving operations and reduce
risks. This mix design adjustments are not expected to introduce any significant differences in the perfor-
mance but are expected to reduce risks of low friction and improve noise damping effect.
6
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0007.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Description of rolling resistance
optimised asphalt in tender documents
KVS tendering process and specifications
Four different contractors were involved in the demonstration project on Climate friendly asphalt. The list of
paved test sections and corresponding contractor is summarized in the table below (Table 1):
Table 1 - List of Climate friendly sections paved in 2018
Location
Distrikt Øst-
danmark
Distrikt Øst-
danmark
Distrikt Øst-
danmark
Distrikt Øst-
danmark
Distrikt Syd-
danmark
Distrikt Øst-
danmark
Name
Helsingørmotorvejen
Helsingørmotorvejen
Sydmotorvejen
Sydmotorvejen
Østjyske Motorvej
Skovvejen
No
14
14
30
30
60
119
Lanes
Length
[km]
1,5
1,5
10
11
4
4
Side
H
V
H
V
H
V
From
400994
410000
1370545
1390495
900660
200700
To
410475
410520
1440020
1430400
920252
220373
Previous
pavement
type
50SMA
80SMA
TBk
80AB
80SMA
60SMA
Last
paved
1993
1993
2001
2000
1994
2005
Contractor
Munck
Munck
NCC
NCC
YIT
Colas
Paved
week
22
22
42-43
41
31
31
The first three sections were tendered as conventional SMA8 and only in a second phase the contractor
adjusted the mixture recipe to the KVS asphalt specifications. The present process could not guarantee
proper competition between contractors on the specific product.
Based on these drawbacks, a change in the tendering process was approved. DRD has tendered the last
section of Climate Friendly asphalt as
a “demonstration
project”. In this case, it was possible to use the spec-
ifications of the EN13108-5 (2016 version). The official name of the mix type was SMA 8 KVS and the follow-
ing significant requirements
apart from the grading - were included in the bidding document:
1) Volumetric requirements
- Voids content [Vmin - Vmax]: 1.5% - 4.5%;
- Voids Filled by Bitumen [VFBmin - VFBmax]: 80
92 %;
-
Voids in the Mineral Aggregates [VMAmin]: ≥ 18 %;
- min 5.0% of limestone filler;
- 1.5% of Hydrated lime as active filler;
- Bitumen 40/100-75;
- Bitumen content 7.1% (based on aggregate density of 2.65 Mg/m ).
2) Mechanical requirements
-
Indirect Tensile Ratio (water resistance) [ITRSmin]: ≥ 80 %
at 15° C, DS/EN 12697-12;
- Permanent
deformation [WTSAIRmax]: ≤ 0.04
mm/10 cycles at 60°C, 40 mm and
3
3
7
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0008.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
compaction ≥ 99 %, DS/EN 12697-22:2007;
-
Permanent deformation [PRDAIRmax]: ≤ 5.0 % at 60°C, 40 mm and compaction ≥ 99 %, DS/EN
12697-22:2007;
- Stiffness Modulus [Smin - Smax]: 1,500
5,000 MPa at IT-CY, 10°C and 124 ms; DS/EN 12697-
26:2018 Annex C.
The requirements were defined based on the results of different projects (COOEE, COOEE+, ROSE,
INNOENERGI, DURAPAV) within which DRD has investigated aspects of the durability of low rolling
resistance mixtures.
The drafted tendering document used in the M30 will be revised based on all the collected data from
mixtures characterization and functional measurements.
Mix specifications used during the negotiation process and the tendering document from the M30 are
included respectively in the Appendix A and B.
After the construction of the different test sections, DRD and the contractors had a very open dialogue where
the described specficiations were dicsussed. Both parts have agreed that the present mix design does not
give much room for typical production variability. KVS mix design limits and boundries need to be loosened
in order to reduce the risks related to construction. Minor changes to the new specifcations should be applied
in order to accommodate some of the concerns faced by contractors and experienced in the field. In
particular the following changes have been suggested:
-
-
-
-
Percentage of passing 2 mm sieve should be 26
34 %;
min. bitumen content from 7.1 to 6.8% (based on aggregate density of 2.65 Mg/m3)
min. % of limestone filler from 5.0 to 4.5%;
multiple possibilities about adhesion improving filler:
a) 1.5% of Hydrated lime
b) 2.0% of cement
c) Alternative chemical additive including 1.5 % limestone filler
-
Maximum Stiffness Modulus [Smax]: from 5000 to 7.000 MPa at IT-CY, 10°C og 124 ms; DS/EN
12697- 26:2018 Annex C;
-
Permanent deformation [WTSAIRmax]: from
≤ 0,04
mm/10 to
0,06 mm/10 cycles at 60°C, 40 mm
3
3
and compaction ≥ 99 %, DS/EN 12697-22:2007.
8
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0009.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Production quality control
Material characteristics and fulfilment of requirements
With respect to production quality control and material characteristics, six different asphalt materials,
identified in Table 2, were investigated. The materials will be linked to more details about company and
project location so in this deliverable the overall reference to the individual materials are their sub-project
number, KLIVE18#xx. Other references will only be given in abbreviated form. The rolling resistance
optimised version of stone mastic asphalt is in Denmark designated with the abbreviation SMA 8 KVS.
The requirements, which the contractors were faced with, depend on the type of ordering. For the first three
demonstration trials, the contractors were asked to fulfil, to the best of their ability, the specifications given in
Annex A. Requirements on SMA 8 KVS for tendering the new surface layer om motorway M30 are given in
Annex B.
The contractors were asked
preferably before paving
to provide their specification for the mix design
including mixture properties such as stiffness modulus and wheel tracking resuts in order to evaluate to
which extent the proposed requirements for the mix type SMA 8 KVS were successfully abided. Often the
offered characteristics were based on laboratory produced mix since neither time or pre-trials could have
allowed for availability of plant produced mix (normally preferred mix type for evaluation of material
characteristics in Denmark). In some cases characteristics for rut resistance at 60 °C and stiffness at 10 °C
were allowed to be documented after the sections had been paved in order to have access to plant produced
mix. The specifiers presumed with some confidence that these characteristics would
be “in an acceptable
range” if the more traditional composition and volumetric requirements were fulfilled.
Table 2 - Overall designation and main feautures of the asphalt materials
Sub-project
number
KLIVE18#01
KLIVE18#02
KLIVE18#03
KLIVE18#05
KLIVE18#06
Material type
SMA 8 KVS
SMA 8 KVS
SMA 8 KVS
SMA 8 KVS
“SMA 8 KVS”
SMA 8
Location
Road number
M14
Hldv 119
M60
M30
Systofte
Contractor
Munck Asfalt A/S
Colas Denmark A/S
YIT A/S
NCC Industry A/S
NCC Industry A/S
Type of ordering
Demonstration trial
Demonstration trial
Demonstration trial
Tendering process
Functional contract
with local
community
Tendering process
KLIVE18#07
M30 ramp
NCC Industry A/S
Role in
project
Candidate
material
Candidate
material
Candidate
material
Candidate
material
Pre-trial
Variant of
KLIVE18#05
Reference
material
Sampling and delivery control data
In connection with each test section, extensive sampling (~200 kg asphalt and ~5 kg bitumen) was
performed for a combination of delivery control and advanced material characterisation. In Table 3 and Table
9
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0010.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
4, the tests or characteristics are listed with reference to the test standards. This present deliverable
concerns only the initial evaluation of fulfilment of the desired target by the individual asphalt contractors.
Table 3 - List of test standards for asphalt materials and additional information on conditions if necessary
Test or characteristica
Binder content
Aggregate density
Marshall density
Marshall compaction temperature
Maximum density
Void content
Void in Mineral Aggregate
Void filled with binder
VB/VS ratio
Gradation
0.063 mm
11.2 mm sieve
Gyratory Compaction
Density after 200 gyrations
Void after 200 gyrations
Compaction Energy Index
ISTM modulus
10 °C - mean (std) Marshall compacted sample
Density of samples
10 °C - mean (std) [gyratory sample @ 200]
20 °C - mean (std) [gyratory sample @ 200]
10 °C - mean (std) [plate compacted, cored]
20 °C - mean (std) [plate compacted, cored]
Wheel Tracking Test at 60 °C
Wheel Tracking slope, WTS
Rut Depth, RD
Proportional Rut Depth, PRD
Standard
DS/EN 12697-1:2006 or
DS/EN 12697-39:2012
DS/EN 1097-6:2013
DS/EN 12697-6:2012
DS/EN 12697-30:2012
DS/EN 12697-5:2010
DS/EN 12697-8:2003
Unit
%
Mg/m
Mg/m
Mg/m
%
%
%
3
3
3
DS/EN 12697-2:2015
%
DS/EN 12697-31:2007
Mg/m
%
3
DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex C
DS/EN 12697-6:2012
DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex C
DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex C
DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex F
DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex F
DS/EN 12697-22 + A1:2007
MPa
3
Mg/m
MPa
MPa
MPa
MPa
mm/1000 cycles
mm
%
The last test method in Table 4 is introduced as a check (primarily on recovered binder) in order to ensure
that results for Elastic recovery, Force ductility and rheology are not biased by excessive amount of
remaining filler from the extraction of the bituminous binder from the asphalt material.
10
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0011.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Table 4 - List of test standards for bitumen and recovered bituminous binder and additional information on conditions if
necessary
Test or characteristica
Penetration at 25 °C
Softening Point Ring & Ball
Elastic Recovery at 10 °C
elongation or length at rupture
Force Ductility at 5 °C
elongation or length at rupture
Rheology - DSR (-10 °C - 100 °C ; 0,01 Hz - 30 Hz)
Rheology - MSCRT (50 °C,. 60 °C & 70 °C)
-1
Infrared spectroscopy (KBr, 4000
400 cm )
Ash or remaining filler content
Standard
DS/EN 1426:2015
DS/EN 1427:2015
DS/EN 13398:2017
DS/EN 13589:2018
DS/EN 14770:2012
DS/EN 16659:2015
In-house, gravimetric, 430 °C
Unit
0.1 x mm
°C
%
mm
J/cm
mm
MPa & °
%
Absorbans
%
2
Overview of data availability from the six asphalt materials and their bituminous binders (either original
bitumen or recovered binder) is given in Annexes C and D. In the following parts of this deliverable values
will be extracted from these tables or from data files which the tables mention as available. At present, the
focus primarily will be on the values from the tested materials.
Traditional asphalt data
Table 5 shows the traditional asphalt data (binder content and densities) and the volumetric proportions of
the material which can be calculated from the values. Based on former Danish tradition for open graded
asphalt materials, the ratio between volume percentage of binder over volume percentage of aggregate is
also calculated, as Denmark used to have a minimum value requirement for this ratio in order to avoid lean
and moisture sensitive mixes.
Table 5 - Traditional asphalt data from analysis (binder content, densities and calculated volumetric characteristics).
KLIVE18#01
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#02
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#03
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#05
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#06
SMA 8 KVS
7.2
2.720
2.376
2.429
2.2
18.9
88
0.205
Characteristic
Unit
Binder content
Aggregate density
Marshall density
Maximum density
Void content
Void in Mineral Aggregate, VMA
Void filled with binder
Binder-Aggregate ratio (v/v)
%
3
Mg/m
3
Mg/m
3
Mg/m
%
%
%
6.4
2.715
2.400
2.454
2.3
17.2
87
0.18
6.7
2.726
2.387
2.451
2.7
18.3
85
0.191
6.3
2.916
2.536
2.610
2.8
18.6
85
0.193
7.1
2.723
2.348
2.434
3.6
19.9
82
0.204
6.1
2.702
2.320
2.455
5.5
19.4
72
0.172
Figure 1 shows the grading curves depicted from the specifications of the different asphalt contractor.
KLIVE18#01
KLIVE18#06 are of type SMA 8 KVS, while KLIVE18#07 (with the punctured line) is a
standard SMA 8 which is used as a reference in this project. KLIVE18#06 is shown with the same line colour
11
KLIVE18#07
SMA 8 ref.
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0012.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
as KLIVE18#05 but with a dotted line, since KLIVE18#06 was engineered to have the same grading as
KLIVE18#05 but with a paving grade 40/60 bitumen.
Figure 1 - Grading curves from the asphalt contractors' specifications
Figure 2 shows further details of the grading curves with the difference between the analysed grading curve
from the asphalt contractors’ grading curve. This graph sums up two elements of potential
deviations from
the specified value: the first is the standard error by production, sampling and analysis; the second is that
some of the contractors were asked to consider minor adjustments of the grading curve in the part below 2
mm just prior to production and paving. The purpose was
based on the experience of the first trial section
to minimise further the risk of having poor friction of the pavement. Since some of the changes happened
very late, these were not included in the initial specification which was based on laboratory produced mix.
The plant produced asphalt materials were then considered a reliable
“reference”
because the former
specification was based on laboratory produced mix which in Denmark is seen as a secondary level
reference for material properties.
12
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0013.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Figure 2 - Difference between the analysed grading curve and the specified grading curve
Figure 3 shows the deviations from the target grading curve of the analysed grading curves of the SMA 8
KVS (as given in Annex A) which has been specified for the asphalt material. Tolerance bands, with respect
to single value determination in accordance with DS/EN 13108-21:2016, are included for information. Figure
3 shows that all five SMA 8 KVS grading curves satisfy within the production tolerances the specified mix
type as described in Annex A.
Table 6 contains the simple binder data for each of the five SMA 8 KVS and SMA 8 ref. The table includes
the analysed data for the original bitumen and the recovered binder. Under each material the contractor’s
information from the specification/DoP (Declaration of Performance) is added. The softening point Ring &
Ball in the DoP for KLIVE18#06 is supposed to represent a neat 40/60 bitumen, while the similar value for
the DoP for KLIVE18#07 represents the target value, since this asphalt material contains approx. 14 % of
reclaimed asphalt surface layer. For the elastic recovery the value or range of the elongation or length at
rupture for three determinations are given.
13
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0014.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Figure 3 - Deviations from the desired target grading curve of the SMA 8 KVS (see Annex A) and the analysed grading curve
including the tolerance bands from DS/EN 13108-21:2016 for single values.
Table 6 - Simple binder data for original bitumen and recovered binder together with contractor's specification.
KLIVE18#01
Contractor's
specification
Recovered
binder
Original
bitumen
Original
bitumen
KLIVE18#02
Contractor's
specification
Recovered
binder
Original
bitumen
KLIVE18#03
Contractor's
specification
40 - 100
80
40/60
= 55
Contractor's
specification
Recovered
binder
54
75.4
76.3
200
KLIVE18#07
Recovered
binder
31
58.4
0
0
Original
bitumen
49
52.4
7.3
0-60
Testmethod
Unit
Penetration at 25 °C
Softening Point R&B
Elastic Recovery at 10 °C
elongation or length at
rupture
0.1 x
mm
°C
%
mm
81
70.6
86.8
200
54
61.2
75
200
40 - 100
> 75
71
76.6
77.8
200
47
75.2
78.3
200
40 - 100
80.0
64
76.0
79.8
200
KLIVE18#05
Contractor's
specification
Recovered
binder
Original
bitumen
Original
bitumen
KLIVE18#06
Contractor's
specification
40/60
= 55
Recovered
binder
38
54.2
0
0
Testmethod
Unit
Penetration at 25 °C
Softening Point R&B
Elastic Recovery at 10 °C
elongation or length at
rupture
0.1 x
mm
°C
%
mm
88
69.6
86.1
200
59
64.6
78.3
200
77
75.0
49
52.4
5.0
50-56
14
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0015.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Further assessment of the characteristics of the bituminous binders (among others rheology and ageing) will
be dealt with in a future deliverable.
Mechanical properties and characteristics of the asphalt materials
This paragraph includes three items:
Gyratory compaction;
Stiffness modulus;
Wheel Tracking Test (WTT).
Table 7 shows the results of the gyratory compaction with density and voids after 200 gyrations. From the
compaction curve, Compaction Energy Index (CEI) is calculated, as the area under the curve of percentage
maximum density versus gyrations from the 8 gyration until 92 % of maximum density (Bahia et al.,1998).
This value of CEI has been used in previous projects (Pettinari et al. 2017), but the overall experience with
the interpretation of CEI is limited. From the values in Table 7, it can be seen that the applicability of CEI on
the mortar rich SMA 8 KVS material type might be questionable. Values for SMA 11 has been found in the
order of 200
400 while a variant of the SMA 8 KVS was close to zero (or with borderline negative single
values). In general, these CEI values give the perception that KVS mixture has very high self-compacting
property given by the chosen mix design. The high percentage of fines adopted to produce a low texture
depth have an impact on the relative air voids of the mixture. Also, the percentage of binder enhances the
self compactability which turn into a drawback when compaction temperature is higher than the optimal. This
might explain some of the problems obtained during the construction of the section on M60 (KLIVE18#03).
th
Table 7 - Results of gyratory compaction and calculation of Compaction energy Index (CEI)
KLIVE18#01
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#02
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#03
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#05
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#06
SMA 8 KVS
2.392
1.53
2.6
Gyratory Compaction
Unit
Density after 200 gyrations
Void after 200 gyrations
Compaction Energy Index
Mg/m
%
3
2.415
1.56
5.8
2.423
1.58
7.7
2.588
0.83
0.1
2.379
2.28
19.5
2.424
1.27
43.9
Table 8 contains the measured values of stiffness in accordance with DS/EN 12697-26 Annex C. The mean
values of stiffness at 10 °C and 20 °C are given together with the respective standard deviation in
parenthesis. The data are also shown in Figure 4. The ratio between the two moduli in Table 8 can be seen
as a crude measure for the temperature sensitivity of the material. The asphalt specimens are six cylindrical
specimens (approx. 101 mm in diameter and height approx. 40 mm) cored and cut out of three gyratory
specimens with a diameter of 150 mm compacted to 200 gyrations. It is important to remember these
compaction conditions, when the values eventually shall be compared with data from the asphalt contractor
which most likely will measure stiffness on specimen after Marshall compaction (2 x 50 blows).
15
KLIVE18#07
SMA 8
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0016.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Table 8 - Measured ITSM modulus (stiffness) at 10 °C and 20 °C on gyratory compacted specimen (200 gyrations). Mean values
and standard deviation (in parenthesis).
KLIVE18#01
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#02
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#03
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#05
SMA 8 KVS
KLIVE18#06
SMA 8 KVS
Characteristic
Unit
Density of samples
ISTM at 10 °C
ISTM at 20 °C
Ratio (20 °C/10 °C)
Mg/m
MPa
MPa
3
2.420
5,376
(334)
2,469
(238)
0.459
2.438
8,213
(806)
2,569
(137)
0.313
2.587
9,655
(641)
3,507
(207)
0.363
2.413
4,383
(281)
1,835
(120)
0.419
2.43
9,638
(637)
4,055
(507)
0.421
2.427
12,249
(1,269)
5,903
(809)
0.482
Figure 4 - Indirect Tensile Stiffness Modulus at 10 °C and 20 °C
A preliminary conclusion on the ISTM stiffness is that combining the desired grading curve and a 40/100-75
polymer modified bitumen, in accordance with DS/EN 14023, does not automatically assure that the ISTM
stiffness at 10 °C is below or in the order of magnitude of 5,000 MPa. KLIVE18#02 and KLIVE18#03 have
moduli at 10 °C significant higher than 5,000 MPa. Based on these results, DRD has decided to raise the
Smax limit from 5,000 MPa to 7,500 MPa. On the other side, some contractors must consider to apply small
changes to their KVS mix design.
16
KLIVE18#07
SMA 8
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0017.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
The procedure for WTT follows DS/EN 12697-22 + A1:2007. The test involves a set of two pairs of compact-
ed AC samples in a conditioned ambient at 60°C and subjecting them to cyclical loading from a rolling-wheel
device. The objective of the test is to measure the depression (in mm) formed on the specimens after a pre-
defined number of cycles, or to record the number of cycles required to achieve a predefined maximum de-
pression level. The results are represented in Figure 5.
Figure 5
summary of the results obtained from wheel tracking test at 60°C
All significant properties related to the permanent deformation resistance defined in the tendering documents
are listed in Table 9.
Table 9
WTT test results as defined by CE marking
Rut Depth
RD
Navn
KLIVE18#01
KLIVE18#02
KLIVE18#03
KLIVE18#05
KLIVE18#06
KLIVE18#07
mm
2.6
1.2
1.3
2.0
7.0
2.4
Proportional
Rut Depth
PRD
%
6.4
3.1
3.3
4.9
17.6
6.1
Height
Height
mm
40
40
40
40
40
40
Wheel Track-
ing Slope
WTS
mm/1.000 cy-
cles
0.03
0.023
0.019
0.070
0.495
0.108
17
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0018.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
WTT test results show that most of the KVS mixtures met the requirements. The only exception is represent-
ed by KLIVE18#05 due to the WTS exceeding the 0.050 mm/1000 cycles. Risk of rutting problem is anyway
excluded due to many aspects such as: weight x square meter of the paved layer, asphalt sample repre-
sentativity and very demanding KVS requirements. It is expected that WTT requirements will be fulfilled by all
the contractors by applying small adjustments to the KVS mix design. (An additional point is that the preci-
sion of the test method with respect to WTS (Wheel Tracking Slope) has not been established, yet).
18
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0019.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Durability test performed at Ulster Uni-
versity
Introduction
To further assess and verify the mixture performances, DRD has decided to include an additional test to
study the durability of the textures on specimens sampled from the 6 different sections. The idea of testing
specimens cored from the field is due to the need of accounting for the impact on the overall KVS asphalt
production and paving.
The most feasible solution has been identified at the University of Ulster in North Ireland. The laboratory
facility has an accelerated loading device, Road Test Machine (Figure 6), which allows testing samples taken
directly from the field.
Figure 6 - Road Test machine at University of Ulster
The Road Test Machine (RTM) located at Ulster University was used to simulate dry, slow speed, high con-
tact stress interaction between the test tyre and the surface texture of the core. This test is known in the UK
as the Wear Test and is used as part of the certification process for testing High Friction Surfacing Systems
(HFS).
The RTM consists of a 2.1 m diameter horizontal table that rotates at 10 rpm. Ten test specimens can be
fixed to this table. Two vertically mounted 195/70R14 test tyres each apply a load of approximately 5 kN.
Tyre inflation pressure is 30 psi. The temperature of the test room is maintained at 10 +/- 2°C during simulat-
ed trafficking. The change in surface texture related properties was determined. This investigation included
skid resistance, mass loss, texture depth and visual appearance. Only the most relevant results, extracted
from the report delivered by Ulster University, are included in the present notes.
The following pavements have been chosen and tested:
-
SMA8 KVS (M14
KLIVE18#01)
19
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0020.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
-
-
-
-
-
SMA8 KVS (vej119
KLIVE18#02)
SMA8 KVS (M60
KLIVE18#03)
SMA11 Reference (M14)
SMA8 Reference (M14)
SMA8 SRS (M40)
Due to time constraints, samples from the M30 (KLIVE18#5) have not been included in the present experi-
ment.
Change in texture depth due to simulated trafficking and percentage of mass loss
The Macrotexture depth (MPD) of each 142 mm diameter core was determined using a modified version of
the volumetric patch technique (EN 13036-1:2010). The 142 mm diameter of each core meant that the
standard 50 ml volume of material could not be used. The standard test method was modified to determine
the mass of sand required to infill the surface texture of each core. The volume of required material could
then be used to calculate a modified Macrotexture Depth.
Figure 7 Plot of modified MPD data.
The change in texture depth, measured on the tested specimens, shows that KVS mixtures have a stable
texture in particular when compared to conventional mixtures. These results highlight that the difference in
rolling resistance properties between KVS and standard mixtures might increase with time due to the
different rate of texture development.
20
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0021.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
The mass of each core was recorded after each period of simulated trafficking. This mass loss was used to
calculate a percentage wear value for each core.
Figure 8
Wear data calculated as percentage of mass loss
The accelerated test results obtained using the RTM confirmed what measured at VTI using the circular road
test (Pettinari et al. 2018). In general, KVS pavement exhibits the most stable texture with the lowest per-
centage of mass loss when compared to standards SMA and SRS mixtures. To provide a more precise esti-
mation of the expected life, it is important to monitor these sections over the coming years and compare field
data to those measured on the RTM. RTM results are promising with regards to durability and it is possible
to assess that the expected life time of KVS mixture should be at least not lower than what shown by stand-
ard SMA 11.
21
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0022.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Construction quality control
All the KVS test sections have been monitored during the construction. At each construction site, a paver
was equipped with an infrared (IR) thermal camera in order to monitor the temperature of the newly paved
asphalt layer as it left the screed of the paver. This has provided a thermal data set from each test site.
Different technologies have been used and these are listed in Table 10. The reference name of asphalt
mixtures are also included in the next table for any comparison to the the laboratory testing.
Table 10 - Road sections where thermal data was collected.
Name of road
Helsingørmotorvejen
Skovvejen
Østjyske motorvej
Sydmotorvejen
Adm.
#
Side
14 R
119 L
60 R
30 L
Lane
H
H
H+F
From km
41/0000
22/0373
90/0660
To km
41/0520
20/0700
92/0252
Contractor
Munck
Colas
YIT
Supplier of
Mix ref.
IR system
KLIVE18#01 TF Tech-
nology
KLIVE18#02 Vögele
KLIVE18#03 Vögele
KLIVE18#05 Vögele
137/0000 145/0000 NCC
The activities completed within this phase can be categorized as a pilot project because for the first time the
DRD has used thermal data collected from the paver to estimate and evaluate, using a consistent procedure,
quality of the paving operations.
The main objectives of using this technology during paving operation are:
-
-
To measure and document thermal readings of the paved HMA as it leaves the screed of the paver;
To develop a control tool to monitor paving operations.
In fact, thermal data of the paving operations become interesting when quality and performance of the fin-
ished asphalt layer must be guaranteed. Thermal segregation, which can be evaluated using thermal read-
ing, can lead to uneven surface properties and premature failure due to a lack of compaction. Thermal imag-
ing technology was found to be an effective tool in identifying temperature segregation during paving [Louay
N. et al. 2019].
The present approach is not only meant to control the contractor but has also the scope to help the contrac-
tor understanding potential problems related to production and paving by:
-
making a method description that gives contractors certain degrees of freedom, allowing for the best pos-
sible outcome and learning scenarios;
-
making a method description that involves iterations of feedback rounds with the involved contractors and
the suppliers of the IR systems.;
-
determining the needed data structure, format and output.
22
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0023.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Thermal analysis: method description
A method description was developed. It must be considered an intermediate version (alpha) because it is
key for a successful method description, to continuously keep gathering experiences from the contractors
and the developers of the used technologies.
The method description was formulated in a way that it should be fulfilled by as many devices as possible.
This is necessary in order to keep a focus on what has to be delivered and not forcing the use of any certain
supplier in order to satisfy the task.
To meet the wish of DRD for getting proper and useable thermal data keeping an open market of suppliers,
certain degrees of freedom must be allowed in the method description and this is given by an iterative pro-
cess between the DRD, the contractors and the developers/suppliers of the technology.
Requirements set in the method description are so far based upon the ‘AAB for varmblandet asfalt’ and the
capability of several different suppliers measuring systems.
The key feature of the method description is to first and foremost give a clear picture of the data that is to be
delivered and respective requirements.
A version of the method description for Thermal Profiling has been drafted and included in the tendering
material for the upcoming project on Haderup Omfartsvej (Annex E).
Algorithm development
To get this process started, a code was developed to identify surface areas that are inhomogeneous in tem-
perature. Two fundamental inputs must be defined and used to process thermal data:
-
-
Critical temperature gradient (ΔT): temperature difference between two adjacent areas;
Cessation temperature (C
t
): temperature where compaction is no longer possible.
Using these two temperature inputs, the data can be processed, and the outcome is represented as example
in the Figure 9. In this specific case, a temperature gradient of 14°C was used and 80°C was defined as
cessation temperature. Both temperatures must be defined in relation to the asphalt mixture properties.
The developed algorithm is accessible by the following link “https://github.com/roadtools/roadtherma”.
The
code firstly trims the raw thermal data:
1)
by identifying and removing any area and foreign objects with a temperature lower than C
t
; these
parts won’t be computed as paved area and consequently not used to provide any statistical evalua-
tion of the quality of the paving operation;
2) by removing portions of the longitudinal joints that were measured but belonging to existing surfaces
scanned by the thermal device;
3) From the trimmed data, the code identifies and calculates how much area in the percentage exceeds
ΔT
(in relation to any given temperature input) and generates a plot.
4) Additionally, the temperature distribution of the surface area is calculated and plotted, cf. example
from the paving operation at Helsingørmotorvejen in Figure 10.
23
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0024.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Figure 9 - Plot of raw data and plot of trimmed data. Example from operations on M14.
Figure 10 - Plots of percentage of surface area exceeding critical temperature levels in relation to potentially critical threshold
temperature and plot of temperature distribution. Example from operations on M14.
24
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0025.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
The developed code should be considered an alpha version and further investigation is requried. Thermal
analysis represents an optimal solution to improve quality control and motivate contractors to focus on
paving operations. The possibility of gaining more experience with this type of technology must be
considered because the benefit related to the use of these data type is significant in particular when even
surface properties and durability are demanded (Williams C. R. et al., 2016). In the next paragraph, all the
data collected during the construction of the KVS sections are represented.
Analysis of the thermal data collected during the construction of the KVS sections
Analysis of the thermal data collected during the paving operations of the KVS sections have been complet-
ed focusing on studying the temperature variability. Furthermore, by using the developed algorithm, it was
possible to estimate a percentage of the paved area which did not satisfy the temperature gradient criteria.
Different temperature gradients were studied.
All data have been trimmed as described in the algorithm to avoid that foreign objects and pavement joints
would affect the statistical analysis. It must be acknowledged that two different technologies were used. It
was not possible to compare the two technologies over a standard surface to quantify potential biases relat-
ed to the two devices. To further investigate the possibility of implementing this technology, it is highly rec-
ommended to compare the two devices over the same surface and compare the outcome of the developed
algorithm.
Considering the collected data, the following relevant information must be listed (Table 11).
Table 11
Differences between the construction sites and thermal devices used
Section
M14
119
M60
M30
Job
(day/night)
night
night
night
day
paver type
lane width
lane width
lane width
full width
feeder
(Yes/No)
No
No
No
Yes
Thermal De-
vice
TF technology
Vogele
Vogele
Vogele
Table 11
confirms that there are several variables on each construction and it won’t be possible to establish
to what degree the variables have affected the results.
Figure 11 summarizes the analysis of the paving temperatures in a histogram over the distribution between
80°C and 180°C considering 10°C intervals. The results show that the section paved on the M30 during the
day and using the feeder has the most even temperature distribution. 60% of the total area was paved within
140 - 150°C interval and 80% within 130 - 150°C. Based on the mix design properties, having a big percent-
age of the paved area within 150
160°C increases the risk of drain down problem. M60 is the section which
has shown this phenomenon in the field. On the other side, if the temperature is low (between 80 - 120°C)
than the mixture cannot be properly compacted, and the surface might result too rough. Temperature analy-
sis shows that this mix type is very difficult to work because of the way it has been designed and demands
very even temperature conditions during paving operations. If the mix gets over-heated, the thickness of the
aggregates coating is reduced increasing the amount of “free binder”
which can flow to the surface giving
25
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0026.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
friction problems when voids in the mixture are lower than 1.5% (considering a gyratory sample at 200 gyra-
tions).
Figure 11
Temperature distribution of the paved KVS sections
Figure 12 shows the percentage of paved area which exceeded the temperature gradient requirement used
as input. In this specific case, different gradients have been used as filter in the algorithm and interpolated.
These data can be divided into two groups. M30 and M14 have lower percentage of area for most of the
investigated temperature gradients when compared to the other construction sites. These data could be
used to evaluate thermal segregation by looking into the evolution of the surface properties over the coming
years. It is expected that with high gradients, the deterioration rate of the mixture should be high because the
higher is the chance to have segregation in the mixture.
It is recommended to monitor the asphalt properties over the coming years to understand and prove the reli-
ability of the analysis. It would be beneficial also to drill some additional cores on those areas where a high
temperature gradient was measured to verify if there are differences in mixture properties and air voids.
26
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0027.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Figure 12
Temperature gradient and relative percentage of area
Quality control using functional measurements
Additional information about the quality of the paving operations can be made studying the functional proper-
ties of the finished layer such as:
-
-
-
MPD;
IRI;
Friction.
In this specific case, friction measurements appear to be relevant. In fact, KVS asphalt mixtures are very rich
in fine aggregates and binder and if these fines are not properly mixed and/or the quality of paving opera-
tions does follow specific criteria (due to paver problems or production temperature) then two issues will be
detected in the field:
-
-
Friction at 60 km/h on left or right wheel path after one week will be higher than 0.35;
Ratio between Min and Max friction will be higher than 0.7.
This criterion seems able to establish the quality of the paving even if it is recommended to further investi-
gate which limits should be used. These limits have been defined based on 4 different sections consequently
it is recommended to further investigate this criterion on a bigger sample of new constructions.
The above described method has been applied on the following sections:
-
-
-
M14 (Figure 13);
119 (Figure 14);
M60 (Figure 15).
27
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0028.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Figure 13 - Surface quality using friction data on M14
Figure 14 - Surface quality using friction data on Vej 119
28
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0029.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Figure 15 - Surface quality using friction data on M60
With regards to friction characteristics and development of the KVS pavements, it must be acknowledged
that within the specifications the same pavement type can be produced by different contractors with relevant
difference in fines content and consequently MPD. This aspect influences the friction characteristics and
measurements. Friction on route 119 can be explained by looking into the average low compaction tempera-
ture and a mix design with a lower content of fines and bitumen compared to the other studied cases. Basi-
cally, their mix type is closer to an SMA8 standard and this is the reason why the MPD is 0.65 mm.
In general, standard friction development cannot be applied on KVS mix type because it is normally pro-
duced with a high content of high polymer modified bitumen and fine gradation. The following remarks need
to be accepted if DRD wants to proceed with the implementation of KVS mixture on a network level:
-
The thicker coating of the mortar makes this mix type more slippery at the beginning compared to
standard SMA8 or SMA11.
-
The rate of development of friction to a stable level is longer compared to standard SMA8 and
SMA11.
-
Stability of the friction measurements are affected by the mix properties and it will take longer time
before the friction will be even on the pavement along the longitudinal direction.
29
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0030.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Analysis of the functional properties
The functional properties included in the investigation are listed below:
1 Mean Profile Depth (MPD), parameter used to quantify pavement macrotexture, is calculated by dividing
the measured profile into segments with 0.1 m length. A linear regression of the segment is subtracted
from the corresponding measured profile to remove the slope and provide a zero-mean profile. Every
segment is then divided into two parts of 0.05 m and for each part the peak value of the profile is deter-
mined. The two peaks and the mean value are used to calculate the MPD and equation is described in
the reference standard ISO 13473-1;
2
3
International Roughness Index (IRI) is measured using a standardized profilometer. IRI was on both
wheel path using the quarter model car. An average value of the IRI was recorded every 10 m.
The friction properties of the test section were monitored using the VIAFRIK following the CEN/TS
15901-5. A fixed slip ratio of 20 % between the measuring wheel and the speed of travel was used. Fric-
tion coefficient is given as mean friction coefficient at any 100 m stretch. Measurement is done at 60
km/h. However, on lines with lower permissible speeds, measurement can be performed at either 40 or
50 km/h as indicated in the table below. The mean friction coefficient value "F” for each measuring
wheel must comply with the following requirements when measuring at a constant speed (Table 12):
Table 12 - Surface
layer, measurement speed and friction coefficient
Meas. Speed
Road with speed limit < 50 km/h
Road with speed limit 50 km/h
Road with speed limit between 60 - 80 km/h
Road with speed limit > 80 km/h *)
40 km/h
50 km/h
60 km/h
60 km/h
Friction (F)
F >0.50
F >0.45
F >0.40
F >0.50
*) On roads with a permitted traffic speed above 80 km/h, an additional measurement can be performed at
80 km / h. The result of this measurement must not be more than 0.10 lower than at 60 km / h. The two
measurements are made immediately after each other.
Table 13 gives a summary of the values for the individual parameters for each section. Note that MPD for the
M30 is under evaluation, possibly due to the defect on the texture lasers, and that the wearing course on the
M60 and some wearing courses on the M30 do not meet the requirement for friction, comparing the road
rules for the hot mix asphalt.
The friction on the M14 is indicated (F> 0.4) as there is a speed limit of 60 km / h on this section of the mo-
torway. Likewise, it applies to route 119, which is a main road, with a limit of 80 km / h.
30
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0031.png
KLIVEJBEL
Technical Report 2019
Road
Lane
Section
From km - to km
Av. IRI left
wheelpath
m/km
0.92
0.89
1.00
1.09
0.96
1.02
0.64
0.67
Av. IRI right
wheelpath
m/km
1.39
0.91
0.96
1.46
0.94
0.94
0.74
0.70
Av. MPD left
wheelpath
mm
0.53
0.45
0.46
0.47
0.52
0.49
0.84*
0.76*
Av. MPD
right wheel-
path
mm
0.47
0.46
0.48
0.49
0.47
0.47
1.24*
1.30*
Friction
60 km/h
Accepted / Not accepted
Accepted (F>0.4)
Accepted (F>0.4)
Accepted (F>0.4)
Accepted (F>0.4)
Accepted (F>0.4)
Accepted (F>0.4)
Accepted (F>0.5)
Accepted (F>0.5)
Partially not accepted
F<0.5
Partially not accepted
F<0.5
Mostly not accepted
F<0.5
Mostly not accepted
F<0.5
Accepted (F>0.4)
Accepted (F>0.4)
M14
M14
M14
M14
M14
M14
M30
M30
Right
Right
Right
Left
Left
Left
Right
Right
Right
Middle
Left
Højre
Middle
Left
Right
Left
km 400994 - km 410475
km 400994 - km 410475
km 400994 - km 410475
km 410520 - km 410000
km 410520 - km 410000
km 410520 - km 410000
km 1370545 - km
1440020
km 1370545 - km
1440020
km 1430400 - km
1390495
km 1430400 - km
1390495
km 900660 - km 920252
km 900660 - km 920252
km 220373 - km 200700
km 220373 - km 200700
M30
Left
Right
0.69
0.81
0.76*
1.11*
M30
Left
Left
0.68
0.74
0.67*
1.10*
M60
M60
Vej
119
Vej
119
Right
Right
Left
Left
Right
Left
Right
Left
0.87
0.69
1.04
1.02
0.87
0.66
0.97
0.94
0.68
0.61
0.76
0.70
0.78
0.81
0.87
0.86
Table 13
Summary of the functional measurements collected by DRD after 6 weeks from the paving operations. *data not reliable due to technical problems
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0032.png
M60 60 kmt højre side venstre bane fra km 900000 til km 930000
KVS fra km 900700 til km 920300
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
Friktion
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
89,5
90
90,5
91
91,5
92
92,5
93
93,5
Kilometer
Venstre hjul
Højre hjul
M60 80 kmt højre side venstre bane fra km 900000 til km 930000
KVS fra km 900700 til km 920300
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
Friktion
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
89,5
90
90,5
91
91,5
92
92,5
93
93,5
Kilometer
Venstre hjul
Højre hjul
Figure 16
Friction on M60, right side and left lane
at 60 (top) and 80 km/h (bottom).
32
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0033.png
M60 60 kmt højre side højre bane fra km 900000 til km 930000
KVS fra km 900700 til km 920300
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
Friktion
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
89,5
90
90,5
91
91,5
92
92,5
93
93,5
Kilometer
Venstre hjul
Højre hjul
M60 80 kmt højre side højre bane fra km 900000 til km 930000
KVS fra km 900700 til km 920300
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
Friktion
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
89,5
90
90,5
91
91,5
92
92,5
93
93,5
Kilometer
Venstre hjul
Højre hjul
Figure 17 - Friction on M60, right side and right lane
at 60 (top) and 80 km/h (bottom).
33
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0034.png
Figure 16 and Figure 17 show that the friction requirement (F> = 0.5), was not met for most of the
section. In this particular case, a warning sign (slippery road) was placed in proximity of the section.
The date of the above measurements was December 10, 2018. Friction measurements were repeated
during spring confirming what was observed in December. It has been established that the surface of
the KVS section on M60 will be water blasted to increase texture depth and rise friction properties.
Additional measurements of the MPD and IRI were completed in April 2019 and the results are de-
scribed in the next paragraph.
Surface characteristics measured in April 2019
The texture of the road surface was measured using the M+P FLaSH|M texture measurement system.
Every millimetre of travelled distance the height is registered. Laser specifications are listed below:
-
-
-
-
Type: LMI Gocator 1340, laser class 3B;
Sample distance: 1 mm;
Measurement range: 210 mm;
Resolution: < 1 μm.
The laser data have been used to measure both IRI, MPD and Skewness. Data from the M14 could
not be included due to practical reasons (traffic conditions, traffic light nearby, etc.).
Figure 18 includes IRI values measured on M30, M60, 119 and includes both KVS and SMA11 mix-
tures.
Figure 18
IRI measured in April 2019 by M+P
34
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0035.png
Data confirm that IRI is not material related, but it is a property linked to the pavement structure and
construction type. Average IRI values on KVS pavements are between 0.6 and 0.75 m/km.
Figure 19 shows the MPD values measured on M30, M60, 119 and includes KVS and SMA11. Aver-
age MPD value measured on KVS pavement type was approximately 0.5 mm. Average MPD value
does not include in this case data obtained on 119 and M60. In the first case, pavement type and tex-
ture were very similar to a standard SMA8. MPD on M60 is much lower than what experienced in the
other sections and trials, due to both mix design limitations and challenges faced during construction.
Figure 19
MPDs measured on KVS pavement and
Skewness of the profile (Rsk) is a dimensionless measure of the asymmetry of a statistical distribution
about its mean. Skewness is a measure of interest because, when it is applied to pavement-texture
profiles, it allows distinguishing between positive- and negative-oriented textures.
Rsk
is calculated as
follows (1):
[ ∫
]
where
Z(x)
is the ordinate value representing the texture-profile height (mm),
Rms
is the root mean
square value of
Z(x),
and
l
is the evaluation length (mm).
Figure 20 summarizes the Skewness values measured on the studied test section. In general, all KVS
mixtures have lower Rsk than those measured on SMA11.
35
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0036.png
Figure 20
Skewness data measured on M30, M60 and 119.
Noise measurements on KVS pavements
Only one contractor had some experience because involved as partner in the projects COOEE and
ROSE (Pettinari et al. 2016a, 2018)
Apart from the section paved on the M30, all the other sections were paved by contractors which did
not have any experience with this mix type. It must be acknowledged that some contractors faced
some challenges which resulted into some variability of the finished layer. It is expected that this vari-
ability which influences the noise emissions of this pavement type, should reduce as function of:
- time;
- experience of the contractor with this pavement type and
- longer sections.
The CPX method was used to perform noise measurements on the Danish test sections with climate
friendly, standard SMA 11 and noise reducing pavements (SRS) having similar life time and traffic
conditions [ISO/CD 11819-2:2017:]. The Standard Reference Tyre (SRTT) was used for all the meas-
urements. The results are corrected to an ambient air temperature of 20 °C (correction factor 0.1 dB/
°C) according to the CPX standard. The measurements have been performed by using the DRD CPX
trailer “deciBellA”. When possible, measurements
were performed at 80 km/h. In the following, a refer-
ence speed of 80 km/h was selected for the presentation of the results, as it is then possible to com-
pare the results from all test sections at this reference speed. Noise measurements are summarized in
the table below (Table 14). Noise reductions and emissions on week 34 were interpolated when real
36
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0037.png
measurements were not available. Noise reduction is referred to average noise emission of standard
SMA11 after 7.5 years. Based on the noise data, it is possible to highlight that KVS pavements have
lower noise emissions than SMA11 and comparable to standard SMA8. Furthermore, based on the
enhanced texture stability, KVS pavement has a lower increasing rate of noise emission over time
than standard SMA11 and SRS (Figure 21).
Table 14 CPX noise level at 80 km/h for the KVS when the surfaces were six months old
Road id - year - Pavement
type
119 - 2018 - KVS
M30 - 2018 - KVS
M30 - 2017 - KVS
*
M30 - 2017 - SMA11
*
M40 - 2018 - SRS
*
*
interpolated
weeks
6
34
6
34
6
34
70
6
34
70
6
34
42
Noise reduction
[dB]
1.0
1.6
1.5
1.3
2.3
2.2
2.0
1.6
1.3
1.0
3.1
1.7
1.3
Noise emission
[dB]
99.6
98.9
99.1
99.3
98.3
98.4
98.5
98.9
99.2
99.6
97.5
98.9
99.3
Figure 21
Noise development from week 6 to week 34, KVS (M30-2017), SMA11 (M30-2017), SRS (M40-2017)
37
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0038.png
Evaluation of the KVS noise spectra compared to SRS and standard SMA pavement
Figure 22 shows all the noise spectra measured using the CPX trailer on KVS pavement type. As ref-
erence the noise spectrum from a noise reducing thin surface layer SMA 8 SRS (Danish abbreviation
SRS
StøjReducerende Slidlag), eight years old, paved at Highway 145 is shown.
Figure 22 - Noise spectra from KVS pavements measured with CPX trailer in 2018
All the sections were monitored with all the standard vehicles to measure texture depth (MPD), rough-
ness (IRI), friction, rolling resistance (RR) and noise. Noise was measured by the DRD while the data
were processed and analysed by a consulting company [Delta report]. The noise spectra of the KVS
pavements show that this pavement type differs significantly from both standard and SRS stone mas-
tic asphalt mixes with 8 mm as nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS).
A result, consistent with what obtained in 2018, was also measured in 2016, when NCC paved the first
KVS pavement in Kalvehave (Figure 23) during ROSE project [Bendtsen et al, 2018].
38
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0039.png
Figure 23 Noise spectra from KVS pavements measured with CPX trailer in 2016 on KVS paved in Kalvehave.
Noise spectra of KVS pavements have a very similar shape which can be described as follow:
-
-
At low frequency range, lower noise impact than standard SMA8 or SRS (7 years old);
At medium frequency range, standard SMA8 and KVS have similar behaviour. On the KVS
paved in 2018, that peak level seems a bit higher compared to what was measured on
Kalvehave and this aspect must be further investigated. Several elements affect the noise
emissions and measurements, and these have not been investigated separately so it is diffi-
cult to establish what has caused this difference.
-
At high frequency range, the noise of the KVS pavement seems similar to a standard SMA8.
It must be mentioned that noise measurements performed in 2018 have not been performed at the
optimal pavement or temperature conditions on the M30. The M30 was paved late October 2018 and
the surface properties were not optimal because this pavement type needs longer time than standard
and SRS types to stabilize. 6 weeks is a valid interval of time with standard and SRS mixes. KVS mix
does not belong to that class because it has high content of high polymer modified bituminous mortar
and it might take longer time (traffic) before the surface texture stabilizes. Furthermore, several signifi-
cant variables, such as temperature of the pavement and moisture, might have influenced the CPX
data. These observations address towards the need of further investigations.
In general, the noise spectra of a KVS pavement type seems very different from standard SMA or
SRS. This is expected to have an impact also in the development of the noise emissions over time.
Further description of the expected development of noise emissions related to KVS are provided in the
following section.
Expected KVS Noise mechanism and development
The KVS pavement type is similar to a standard SMA 8 when considering aggregates gradation. The
filler components have been selected with the goal of producing a stiff mortar to increase wearing
39
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0040.png
resistance and better support of the aggregate skeleton. Air Voids content (AV), defined by the speci-
fications, does not differ from standard mix type. KVS has high content of highly polymer modified
binder which exhibits higher adhesion characteristics compared to standard binders. These fundamen-
tal mix properties have been designed to improve mix durability but have an impact on initial noise
emission and noise development.
In the figure below (Figure 24), the noise spectra of a KVS pavement has been described trying to
define mixture characteristics and their relative impact on noise.
Figure 24 - Description of the expected noise mechanism produced by KVS compared to conventional mixes
The gradation of the KVS mix does not differ much from a standard SMA 8 mixture and so the voids
content. This will reflect in the skeleton structure of the layer, as drafted in Figure 24. The main differ-
ence is related to the mastic and thickness of the binder coating around the aggregates. A thick coat-
ing should affect, in particular at the beginning, the voids in the texture while the higher wearing re-
sistance of the KVS influences the change of the texture and relative voids over time. This might result
into a slightly higher noise during the early stage of the pavement life span but a completely different
development over time. The previous hypothesis that noise of the KVS pavement will develop as a
standard SMA 8, SMA 11 or SMA 8 SRS might not be correct. This new observation must be docu-
mented and verified by following the development of the noise spectra of the SMA 8 KVS in the future.
40
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0041.png
Since KVS has a demonstrated long lifespan, also measured in the functional property of noise, the
noise measurements as shown in Figure 21 are employed in to model the further noise development
for KVS over the lifespan and compare to SMA8, SMA11 and SRS. This modelled noise development
for KVS is visualized in Figure 25, including the comparison with SMA8, SMA11 (included as the
standardized reference for noise comparisons) and SRS. The SMA8 and SRS are included with aver-
age figures of measurements conducted for each respective pavement type on the current paved
stretches with these pavement types
The results, as shown in Figure 25, suggest an increasing noise reduction for KVS during the lifespan
relative the other pavement types, particularly in relation to SRS and SMA11.
Figure 25
Graph depicting the noise development over time for KVS relative to an SMA8, an SMA11 and the SRS
How the noise emission for KVS on the paved KVS-stretches will develop over time will be monitored
closely and frequently in the coming years to document the functional characteristics in this regard and
to compare these results to other pavement types.
41
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0042.png
Measuring Rolling Resistance and Fuel
consumption
Description of the TUG trailer
The TUG trailer (Figure 26), developed by the Technical University of Gdansk (TUG), was used to
measure the rolling resistance of the test sections. The TUG trailer was participating in the MIRIAM
project where trailers for measuring rolling resistance were evaluated. The TUG trailer came out with a
good repeatability and it is now the most used trailer in Europe for measuring rolling resistance. The
trailer is equipped in such a way that influences from factors as road inclination and longitudinal accel-
eration are eliminated.
Three tires were adopted and compared for the measurement of the RR coefficients (Figure 26, Table
12). The SRTT ("Standard Reference Test Tire") is specified in ASTM F2393 as a reference tire for
various purposes. The AAV4, light truck tire, is a tire tested and found to classify pavements (for noise)
in roughly the same way as a selection of regular heavy truck tires do. The smallest dimension for this
series of tires, SRTT, fits on large passenger cars. The MCEN tire was used by TUG from the time
when they started to make RR measurements and has been kept for the purpose of providing a link to
old measurements (Sandberg et al, 2011).
Figure 26 - The tire/road rolling resistance measurement TUG trailer and tires used.
42
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0043.png
Table 15 - Tires characteristics
SRTT
AAV4
225/60R16
195R14C
Tread:
Tread:
Construction
1polyester+2steel
1nylon+2steel+2polyester
Sidewalls: 1polyester
Sidewalls: 2polyester
Max load [kG]
730
950/900
Max inflation
240
450
[kPa]
Hardness [Sh]
65
62
Tire
Size
MCEN
225/60R16
Tread: 1polyester + 2steel +
1polyamid Sidewall:
1polyester
750
350
63/70
It is relevant to recognize that the tires used in 2012 and 2013 have been also used on other test sec-
tions and these may present different levels of wear. The DRD bought their own tires which were used
in 2014 and the following years.
Temperature Correction Factor
Temperature correction was applied following the ISO 28580 (ISO
28580:2009)
(2):
{
}
(2)
Where C
r,25
is the Rolling Resistance coefficient at the Reference temperature;
C
r,T
is the Rolling Resistance at the measurement temperature;
K is constant related to the used tire. (K
SRTT
= 0.015, K
AAV4
= 0.010, K
MCEN
= 0.015)
All RR coefficients represented below were corrected using the mentioned approach.
Furthermore, if the same load is applied on the measurement wheel then type and aging of the tire,
used for rolling resistance measurements, might be relevant variables to control.
Rolling Resistance measurements
Rolling Resistance measurements were completed during week 30.
The research team from Technical University of Gdansk was able to measure different sections paved
with low rolling resistance pavements. RR measurements campaign included:
-
-
-
-
-
-
M14 on KVS;
M30 on SMA11 and KVS;
119 on KVS;
M60 on KVS;
Vej 619 on KVS paved in 2012;
Vej 619 on KVS paved in 2015.
43
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0044.png
The results from the test section paved in 2012 are not presented because the measurements did not
show RR difference between the Low Rolling Resistance and standard SMA8. This pavement was the
first test section paved during the COOEE project and was not produced applying the mix design op-
timization developed during ROSE project.
The figures (Figure 27, Figure 28, Figure 29) below represent the RR measurements (with SRTT)
performed in 2018 and 2019. Rolling resistance reductions shown in the charts are referred to a
standard pavement type paved in close proximity to the test section.
Figure 27 - RR reduction compared to SMA8 standard
50 and 80 km/h
Figure 28 - RR reduction compared to SMA11 standard
80 and 110 km/h
44
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0045.png
Figure 29 - RR reduction compared to SMA8 standard
50km/h
Based on the RR data visualized in the figures, the following aspects can be highlighted:
-
RR reduction reduces with increase in speed. KVS is more effective at low speed. At 110
km/h, the difference between KVS mixture and SMA11 is about 5% while at 80 km/h goes up
to 6.6%;
-
The highest contribution, in terms of RR reduction was measured at 50 km/h. This analysis
was done on two test sections and the RR reduction was on average 9.2% (compared to a
SMA 8). RR data measured on SMA11 at 50 km/h are not available.
To further understand the results, RR measurements have been averaged after being corrected to a
reference temperature of 25°C. The temperature correction factor needs to be further validated but if
applied over a set of data collected at similar temperature and over many measurements, the correct-
ed RR value can be considered reliable.
Table 16 does summarize the RR measurements performed in 2018 and 2019. For each mix type, a
RR value was calculated averaging the different measurements available at the same speed.
Table 16 - RR data from July 2018 and April 2019 corrected to a reference temperature and reductions.
Mix type
SMA 11
SMA8 KVS
SMA8 st
Rolling Resistance at 25°C []
RR reduction at 25°C [%]
80 km/h
0.00926
0.00856
0.00867
110 km/h
0.01046
0.00977
NA
80 km/h
Ref
7.6
6.4
110 km/h
Ref
6.5
NA
45
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0046.png
Fuel consumption measurements
The DRD has contracted a Dutch company “M+P” to measure fuel consumption (FC)
on the KVS and
standard sections. The equipment is presented in Figure 30.
Figure 30 - M+P fc measurement equipment
For the measurements, a 2016 Mercedes Vito 119 Bluetech (registration VT-341-Z) was used. It was
fitted with Continental ContiVanContact 200 tires which were set at 3.3 bar at 10°C air temperature.
The fuel consumption is measured from the on-board computer in
L/hr.
This is determined from the
quantity of fuel that is actually injected in each combustion cycle and multiplied by the number of com-
bustions per revolution and the rpm.
Because the expected variations on the fuel consumption due to differences in road texture are typi-
cally small, it is critical to reduce influencing factors that are not being investigated in this project.
The following check list was used to reduce the unwanted influences:
-
if possible, select measurement days with low wind speeds (< 5 m/s) and limit the amount of
other traffic;
-
-
weather conditions: dry, low wind speed, air temperature around 20°C;
run-in of approximately 30 minutes. The tire pressure is monitored, and measurements were
done only when the tire pressure was stable;
-
the weight of the vehicle should be kept as constant as possible by keeping the tank full and
driving with the same number of operators;
-
-
keep measurement speed constant at 84 km/h;
drive with cruise control in highest gear;
46
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0047.png
-
-
external energy consumer should be kept constant;
keep distance of at least 50 meters from traffic (front and back).
Because the FC measurement method is influenced by many different variables and that impact of
pavement texture on FC is very difficult to isolate when data are collected over a singular section, the
FC investigation was formulated with the main objective to define an empirical model to estimate FC
based on MPD which could be used as support to the MIRAVEC model (Carlson et al. 2013). For this
purpose, FC measurements have been ordered over different types of pavements including most of
the KVS sections paved in 2018. M14 was not included in the FC measurement campaign due to both
amount of traffic normally present in that section and speed limit of 60 km/h.
A total of 200 km of FC data were collected. All processed data used in this investigation were meas-
ured by the same vehicle and averaged over 20 meters section length. Texture data and longitudinal
profile data point, used in the regression analysis, are an average value of the relative measure on
both wheel paths over 20 meters section.
FC data were corrected by wind, pitch angle and differences in driving speed. Correction models were
derived from measurements done in the Netherlands. During the measurements in Denmark, it was
noted that the measured wind speed on some sections was significantly higher than that used to cali-
brate the wind correction model. Strong wind was faced mainly on the M30. This introduced some
uncertainty in the corrected FC data and for this reason regression analysis on FC data was complet-
ed including both wind vectors (crosswind^2, headwind) and MPD.
Texture laser data collected on the wheel paths have been used to measure several texture and pro-
file characteristics including IRI and Mega-texture. Distribution of the measured texture and profile
characteristics are shown Figure 31.
IRI data ranges between 0.3 m/km and 4.2 m/km but 80% of the IRI data are lower than 0.9 m/km.
MPD data were found to range from 0.1 mm to 1.4 mm. 90% of the MPDs are between 0.3 and 1.2
mm. IRI was not included in the regression model for two reasons:
-
-
IRI is not a mixture property;
IRI data set was too narrow and when included in the statistical analysis of the FC data, IRI
was found not to be as significant as the MPD.
The result of the regression analysis shows that fuel consumption increases with the increase in tex-
ture depth (Figure 32). Reliability of the regression model is low (Multiple R = 0.4, R =0.17) but this is
probably related to the fact that FC is affected by many different variables and those related to the
surface characteristics have a relatively small impact when compared to others such as wind and
slope of the road. Furthermore, FC measurement has as well some variability which might affect the
robustness of the extracted model.
In general, it is relevant to highlight that the FC reductions calculated using the model in equation (3)
does not differ significantly from those developed in the MIRAVEC project.
2
47
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0048.png
Figure 31
Distribution of MPD, IRI and 400 mm wavelength samples on the pavements where FC measurements was
completed
Figure 32
FC regression model as function of MPD
48
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0049.png
The model represented in equation 3 was used to estimate hypothetical reduction of CO
2
which could
be produced by the implementation of a Climate friendly pavement on DRD road network. This model
cannot be considered reliable if applied on pavements having different roughness characteristics from
those used to calibrate the model. The model has been calibrated on pavements having negative tex-
ture, so it is not known if the validity can be extended also to other pavement types. The model can be
considered reliable for MPD values between 0.3 mm and 1.3 mm.
49
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0050.png
Potential for CO
2
reduction based on
surface characteristics
The potential reduction by substituting the SMA wearing courses normally chosen for the Danish State
Road Network with a KVS wearing course has been evaluated, based on the surface characteristics
and relative development. Results obtained with the accelerated testing showed that the main ad-
vantage of the KVS is the longevity of the texture compared to the SMA wearing courses. The rolling
resistance values measured by the TUG trailer could only be used to evaluate the initial fuel savings,
but the development of rolling resistance during the wearing course life is yet unknown. To quantify
the development of future fuel (and CO
2
) savings, the model described in equation 3 of the present
report was used and fed with data for MPD development of actual SMA wearing courses. Initial MPD
and relative development for KVS was extracted from the results obtained at Ulster university using
the Road Test Machine.
Figure 33 - Measured MPD developments and assumptions for developments used in the calculations.
50
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0051.png
The starting point in Figure 33 are MPD-values measured on the State Road Network for the two
wearing course references SMA8 and SMA11, both showing an increasing trend with increased wear-
ing course age. During the accelerated test, the pavements samples were subjected to 60.000 load
applications. Relative shift factors, to covert number of wheels passes to life time, were calculated by
comparing the changes in MPD of a standard pavement with those obtained at the RTM. The analysis
has given a shift factor of 2.817E-4 years/wheel passes and consequently it was found that the testing
could have been considered representative of a period of 17 years. The trend lines for the actual
pavements and the accelerated testing are then reasonably parallel. The results from the accelerated
testing of the KVS samples are also illustrated in the Figure 33. Finally, from these measured data,
simplified model assumptions for the MPD development of SMA11, SMA8 and KVS are evaluated.
Table 17 - MPD values used in as basis for the calculation of potential CO
2
reduction.
SMA11
Initial MPD value
MPD after 17 years
0.75
1.20
SMA8
0.60
1.15
KVS
0.50
0.70
Especially for KVS, where the accelerated testing gave rather varying results for the three different
KVS sections, a solid estimation of MPD development is difficult, but the values have been chosen to
reflect that the MPD development rate of KVS is lower than for the SMA references, which was the
main result of the accelerated tests performed at both VTI and Ulster University.
With regards to fuel consumption (FC), the adopted model assumes 2.9% fuel consumption reduction
when MPD is reduced from 1.25 mm to 0.5 mm.
The following methods and assumptions provide the basis for FC calculations and results:
-
The potential reduction by using KVS is calculated relative to the wearing course that would other-
wise be chosen. Currently this reference is SMA8 for the main roads and SMA11 for motorway sec-
tions where noise emission is not critical. However, since SMA8 is today used on a large proportion
of the motorways (and especially those with high traffic volumes), SMA8 is considered the refer-
ence wearing course for 70% of the motorways and SMA11 for the remaining 30%.
-
Fuel savings relative to the SMA references are time dependent and increasing with wearing
course age.
-
All wearing courses are substituted during a 15-year period, with 1/15 each year. The wearing
courses paved in e.g. year 10, only contributes with savings for the following years, and the sav-
ings calculated represent the saving potential for the first years relative to the SMAs.
-
A 17-year calculation period has been chosen since this is a conservative estimation of KVS wear-
ing course life.
-
The traffic volume for 2018 for main roads and motorways is used as starting point for the calcula-
tions and an annual traffic increase of 1,5% is applied.
51
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0052.png
-
The CO
2
reduction potential is calculated based on a CO
2
emission of 180 g/km. This is an estima-
tion for a weighted average value for cars and trucks representing the calculation period 2020
2037. In 2018 the corresponding value was 206 g/km, but this value will gradually decrease as a
result of more strict emission requirements for new vehicles and an increasing proportion of electric
vehicles.
With this model and an assumed linear MPD-increase, the following potential fuel and CO
2
reductions
can be calculated (Table 18):
Fuel re-
duction
KVS ref.
SMA11
(%)
1.01
1.07
1.13
1.19
1.24
1.30
1.36
1.42
1.48
1.53
1.59
1.65
1.70
1.76
1.82
1.87
1.93
1.99
Year
Fuel re-
duction
KVS ref.
SMA8 (%)
0.41
0.49
0.57
0.66
0.74
0.82
0.90
0.99
1.07
1.15
1.23
1.31
1.39
1.47
1.55
1.63
1.71
1.79
Percentage
wearing
courses
substituted
7
13
20
27
33
40
47
53
60
67
73
80
87
93
100
100
100
100
CO
2
reduction
potential main
roads (ton
CO
2
)
362
809
1,346
1,976
2,702
3,528
4,458
5,496
6,646
7,912
9,298
10,808
12,448
14,222
16,133
17,736
19,380
21,065
44,171
156,325
CO
2
reduction
potential mo-
torways (ton
CO
2
)
1,335
2,885
4,657
6,661
8,905
11,398
14,149
17,168
20,465
24,049
27,931
32,121
36,631
41,472
46,654
50,520
54,484
58,547
138,268
460,032
Total CO
2
reduc-
tion potential
State Road Net-
work (ton CO
2
)
1,697
3,694
6,004
8,637
11,607
14,926
18,607
22,664
27,111
31,961
37,229
42,930
49,079
55,693
62,787
68,256
73,864
79,612
182,438
616,357
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2021-
2030
2020-
2037
Table 18 - Potential fuel and CO
2
reduction for a gradual full implementation of KVS on the State Road Network.
52
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0053.png
Economic perspectives of paving KVS
Socio-economic analysis
Four KVS stretches were paved in 2018 as part of the large-scale implementation project where the
Danish government, through the
PSO-aftalens grønne klimapulje,
funded the added price of the KVS.
These stretches enabled comprehensive measuring campaigns to increase knowledge on the materi-
al- and functional properties and effects of KVS, as a pavement type, from large-scale implementation
to allow for a final documentation of these.
KVS was paved on
Helsingørmotorvejen
(M14),
Østjyske motorvej
(M60),
Sydmotorvejen
(M30) and
Skovvejen
(route 119), all specified below (Table 19).
Table 19 - Specification of where KVS was paved in 2018
Location
Name
No
Length
[km]
3
3
10
11
4
4
Side
From
To
Previous
pavement
type
50SMA
80SMA
TBk
80AB
80SMA
60SMA
Last paved
Distrikt Østdan-
mark
Distrikt Østdan-
mark
Distrikt Østdan-
mark
Distrikt Østdan-
mark
Distrikt Syddan-
mark
Distrikt Østdan-
mark
Helsingørmotorvejen
Helsingørmotorvejen
Sydmotorvejen
Sydmotorvejen
Østjyske Motorvej
Skovvejen
14
14
30
30
60
119
H
V
H
V
H
V
400994
410000
1370545
1390495
900660
200700
410475
410520
1440020
1430400
920252
220373
1993
1993
2001
2000
1994
2005
From the paving contracts, the price of KVS from each paved stretch was placed into an impartial
analysis to obtain a future realistic price for KVS. Seeing that the paving of KVS in 2018 was a first
KVS-contract for all but one of the involved contractors, it was strongly expected that a significant por-
tion of the added price of KVS could be subscribed to the risk of working with KVS as a new pavement
type. Through the impartial analysis, it was assessed that a realistic future price of KVS is 10 % higher
than was is currently used as the standard pavement. For the further socioeconomic analyses, 10 % in
added price for KVS is therefore employed as a fixed price.
Alongside having a specified added price of KVS as input for the socioeconomic analyses, results
from measurements conducted on the four KVS-stretches on MPD, IRI, alongside updated values of
noise annoyance and AADT as input allows for socioeconomic analyses on how the added price gen-
erates socioeconomic resource back to the society.
53
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0054.png
As a key objective for conducting socioeconomic analyses of KVS-implementation, the results can be
used to analyze where on the Danish state road network the implementation of KVS can be focused
most effectively. The four sections are included in the subsequent analyzes with the specific areas and
specific driving directions on which KVS is paved.
The socio-economic analyzes result in four main outcomes;
net present value, internal interest rate,
net profit per public invested krone,
as well as
CO
2
shadow price.
The net present value
reflects the total value of all costs and effects, discounted to 2019 with a dis-
count rate (4%). A positive net present value means that the measure is profitable.
Internal rate is the discount rate,
which gives a net present value of zero. An internal rate of more than
4% means that the measure is profitable.
Net profit per public invested krone
compares the profit with the impact on the Treasury. Here too, a
positive value entails that the measure is profitable. The note of lower fuel tax revenues, due to the
lower rolling resistance, is included as a loss to the public coffers.
The CO
2
shadow price
is an expression of the specific socioeconomic cost of KVS to reduce a single
tonne of CO
2
equivalent. A negative shadow price (which results in a positive net present value)
means that there will be socioeconomic surplus by implementing the measure, even without a CO
2
reduction. Thus, the CO
2
saving will by itself not entail a socioeconomic cost. The magnitude of a neg-
ative value in shadow price may be difficult to interpret.
To conduct the socioeconomic analyses, the company
Incentive
has developed a tool specifically tai-
lored to analyse the benefits of paving KVS as opposed to other types of pavements, in socioeconom-
ic terms. The tool is based on the TERESA (Transportministeriets
Regnearksmodel for Sam-
fundsøkonomisk Analyse)
model. TERESA is specifically designed for socioeconomic analyses within
the field of transportation (Incentive, 2013).
Incentive has as key merit in this context and project to have been the key developer of TERESA
which hereby secures the integrity of the tool developed for socioeconomic analyses on KVS-
implementation. This developed tool was made in accordance with ruling principles of socioeconomic
analyses marked by the Danish Ministry of Finance. By employing this TERESA-based tool, the socio-
economic results in this project is in line with already existing, proven and accepted approaches from
other Danish ministries which enables direct basis for comparing effects and perspectives across sec-
tors and initiatives of CO
2
-reduction.
As written above, KVS is assessed to have an added price of 10 %, compared to other pavements
currently opted for. This added price forms the basis of the socioeconomic analyses where the added
price is compared to monetized beneficial effects. All socioeconomic analyses are conducted by com-
paring how paving KVS will affect the society as opposed to a pavement type currently otherwise
used.
54
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0055.png
The socioeconomic analyses are calculated over 16 years, corresponding to a conservative assump-
tion that the lifetime of the KVS is equal to the lifespan of another pavement type otherwise used. If
the expected additional lifespan of KVS is achieved, for example 1-3 years, it will result in better soci-
oeconomic results.
Input parameters for the socioeconomic analyses are as follows:
-
-
-
-
-
Pavement costs, both KVS and a pavement type currently used (10 % added price for KVS)
Lifespan, both for KVS and a pavement type currently used
Noise annoyance number, including development throughout lifespan (modelled)
Urban proximity specification which will enable inclusion on effects of particle pollution
Fuel consumption for KVS and pavement types currently used (SMA8 & SMA11), as specified in
“Potential for CO
2
reduction”
-
AADT, including assumed development throughout lifespan, equal assumption as used in the CO
2
-
reduction potential later described in this report.
As shown in Table 20, KVS is analysed as profitable on all paved stretches. On two of these sections,
the extra cost has been earned back to the society in less than a year, so it is a very good socio-
economic investment. In general, it is saved driving costs for road users which provides the greatest
contribution to the positive effects. In addition, noise reduction generates a particularly high gain on
the M14, as the traffic load (AADT) is the highest of the four stretches and the road stretch is heavily
situated in urban areas. The most significant negative effect is generally lost fuel taxes to the state,
where additional investment weighs less heavily.
Table 20
- Summary of socio-economic results of the four sections with KVS and a specification of the
average CO
2
reduction per year per section over the lifetime
Present day values in mill. Kroner
Operation (marked price)
added
costs.
Driving costs
Noise
Air pollution
Climate/CO
2
Tax charges (incl. corrections)
Labour supply
Net present value
Internal rate is the discount rate
Net profit per public invested krone
CO
2
-reduction (avg. tonne annually)
Helsingørmotorvejen
(M14)
-1,0
28,3
12,1
2,2
2,3
-10,6
0,7
33,9
>100%
2,91
525
Sydmotor-
vejen (M30)
-1,0
10,2
0,7
0,7
0,8
-3,8
0,2
7,7
80%
1,58
189
Østjyske
Motorvej (M60)
-0,2
4,4
0,0
0,3
0,4
-1,7
0,1
3,4
>100%
1,86
82
Skovvejen
(Route 119)
-0,2
1,5
0,0
0,1
0,1
-0,6
0,0
1,0
63%
1,39
28
55
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0056.png
CO
2
-shadow price (kroner per tonne)
-4.022
-2.432
-2.466
-2.186
The operation must be read as both costs for construction and operation of KVS and is translated at
market prices in TERESA. In short, here the public spending (and revenue) is compared with private
consumption, incl. VAT and taxes. Driving costs, in this regard, consist of fuel consumption.
As shown in Table 20, KVS is profitable on all lines. On all the paved KVS-stretches, the socioeco-
nomic investment is proven successful.
As mentioned, it is saved driving costs for road users, which makes the greatest contribution to the
positive effects. In addition, the noise-reduction effect on M14 provides a particularly high socioeco-
nomic gain. Again, the most significant negative effect is generally the lost fuel taxes to the state,
where additional investment is less significant.
Economic implementation analyses
Theoretical socio-economic calculations have also been carried out for roads similar to route 119, but
with lower traffic as most effects follow the traffic volume. It is not possible to give a general indication
of the noise effect in this context, so this is omitted. These theoretical analyzes have been carried out
to identify the level at which KVS can be applied profitably. Seeing the profitability is heavily influenced
on AADT, the theoretical are based with this as criteria. The results are shown in Table 21.
Table 21
-
Overview
of the profitability of paving KVS, based on criteria with varied traffic volume (ÅDT)
Present day values in mill. Kroner
Operation (marked price)
added costs.
Driving costs
Noise
Air pollution
Climate/CO
2
Tax charges (incl. corrections)
Labour supply
Net present value
Internal rate is the discount rate
Net profit per public invested krone
CO
2
-reduction (avg. tonne annually)
CO
2
-shadow price (kroner per tonne)
> 6,000 in AADT
-0,2
0,6
Not incl.
0,0
0,1
-0,2
0,0
0,3
23%
0,74
12
-1.468
2,200 in AADT
-0,2
0,2
Not incl.
0,0
0,0
-0,1
0,0
0,0
4,2%
0,01
5
240
As evident in Table 22, KVS is profitable on state roads with traffic loads on road with an ADT of ap-
proximately 2,000 or more. Approximately 95% of the state roads have an AADT of 2,000 and above.
56
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0057.png
Thus, it is assessed that KVS is socioeconomically viable on the vast majority of the state road net-
work.
A transition to opting for KVS as the sole future pavement type will result in an annual additional cost
of around DKK 26.4 mill. seen for the period 2020-2029, based on an added price of 10% for KVS.
The defined annual need varies according to the resource need specific for the respective year for the
natural re-paving cycle on the state road network. At present, an annual variation of the additional cost
to KVS is seen between DKK 9.6 - 43.0 mill. kroner during this period (2020-2029) and is specified in
Table 22 below.
Table 22
- Overview of the Road Directorate's needs assessment for pavement replacement, distributed on
an annual basis over the period 2020-2029, and an estimate of what KVS will comprise of additional costs
in choosing this pavement.
Year
Ressource needs
Added cost for KVS
(mio. kr.)
(mio. kr.)
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
Total
137
204
300
430
246
370
393
273
192
96
2.641
13,7
20,4
30,0
43,0
24,6
37,0
39,3
27,3
19,2
9,6
264,1
57
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0058.png
Conclusions
Four different contractors were involved in the demonstration project on Climate friendly asphalt. The
list of paved test sections and the relative contractors is summarized in Table 1.
Only the section paved by NCC was defined based on a standard tendering process. An additional
Climate friendly pavement was negotiated with NCC on Nordjyske Motorway, but due to some issues
faced during the trial production, the Danish Road Directorate has decided to pave a standard SMA11
in accordance to what was originally defined within the terms of the contract (before the planning of
Climate friendly asphalt).
All the contractors were capable to fulfil standard KVS specifications. Still, a relevant variability in mix
characteristics and finished surface properties were delivered.
Considering the gradation envelope, Munck has produced the mix with the highest percentage of
passing to the 2 mm sieve. This resulted into a very low MPD and a friction level close to the accepta-
ble limit.
Colas, instead has adopted a different strategy during production and kept that percentage closer to
the lower limit of the envelope. The result was a higher texture depth, which also meant that the fric-
tion demands were fulfilled within a shorter period.
With regards to friction: Standard friction development cannot be applied on KVS mix types. This is
because it is produced with a high content of high polymer modified bitumen and fine gradation. The
following remarks need to be accepted if DRD wants to proceed with the implementation of KVS mix-
ture on a network level:
-
The thicker coating of the mortar makes this mix type more slippery at the beginning com-
pared to standard SMA8 or SMA11.
-
The rate of which friction develops to a stable level is longer comparable to standard SMA8
and SMA11.
-
Stability of the friction measurements are affected by the above-mentioned mix properties.
This means that it will take longer time before the friction can be measured evenly on the
pavement in the longitudinal direction.
-
KVS mixture paved by Colas on the Hldv 119 is an exception simply because the produced
mix has a lower content of fines and bitumen, which gave higher MPD. Basically, their mix
type is closer to an SMA8 standard and this is the reason why the MPD is approx. 0.7 mm.
58
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0059.png
DRD has decided to include an additional test to study the durability of the textures
on specimens
sampled from the 6 different sections.
-
-
-
-
-
-
SMA11 Reference (M14)
SMA8 Reference (M14)
SMA8 SRS (M40)
SMA8 KVS (M14)
SMA8 KVS (Hldv 119)
SMA8 KVS (M60)
The test was performed at Ulster University and the results have shown that KVS mixtures have a
durable and stable texture. Optimized selection of aggregates, high content of polymer modified binder
combined with the use of selected fillers provides a longer durability of the KVS mixture compared to a
standard SMA8. The expected durability of the KVS should be approximately similar to a standard
SMA11 (average 17 years). The KVS mix has a very high cracking and permanent deformation re-
sistance. DRD could consider applying these mix design adjustments on standard SMA8 - increasing
the durability up to 2 - 3 years.
Within the KVS project, DRD has been working on the development of a method to estimate the quali-
ty of the paving operations which could be used to identify pavement areas where it is expected to
have poor degree of compaction and consequently premature failures. All the paved sections were
monitored during construction and IR data were collected.
To improve a guarantee of high quality of paving operations, also friction measurements appear to be
relevant when friction on left and right wheel path are compared.
Functional properties have been summarised in Table 13. The difference in MPD between the differ-
ent contractors are related to difference in production and adopted mix design. In fact, the mix specifi-
cations allow a contractor to define a gradation within a relatively open envelope. The difference be-
tween minimum and maximum limits for each sieve are defined based on European Standards. In this
specific case, MUNCK and YIT have produced a finer mixture and the percentage of passing of the 2
and 4 mm sieves is close to the upper side of the envelope. Colas has produced a coarser gradation
which follows the lower side of the envelope.
Noise measurements show that KVS mix have noise absorption like a standard SMA8. Based on the
analysis of the noise spectra, it is not possible to predict how KVS noise emissions will develop over
time. Due to the enhanced texture stability and durability, noise emissions of KVS pavements are ex-
pected to have a lower growing rate than standard mix and SRS mixtures.
59
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0060.png
KVS pavement type has low RR properties compared to standard SMA8 and SMA11. On average,
KVS has showed 7% RR reduction during the measurement campaign completed in April 2019.
Using FC measurements, it was possible to extrapolate a linear model that correlates texture depth
and Fuel consumption. Using the developed model, expected FC reductions compared to standard
pavements over life time were calculated (Table 23):
Table 23
calculated CO
2
reductions given by KVS pavement
CO
2
reduction [%]
KVS vs SMA11
KVS vs SMA8
* expected life time of KVS pavements
Pavement age (years)
0
1.00%
0.40%
17*
2.00%
1.80%
CO
2
reductions given by KVS, when compared to standard pavements having the same age, are ex-
pected to increase over time due to the long-lasting performance and texture stability.
If KVS pavement is implemented in Denmark starting from 2020, the amounts of expected CO
2
reduc-
tion are shown in Table 24.
Table 24 Potential fuel and CO
2
reductions given by KVS implementation
Year
CO
2
reduction poten-
tial main roads (ton
CO
2
)
44,171
156,325
CO
2
reduction poten-
tial motorways (ton
CO
2
)
138,268
460,032
Total CO
2
reduction potential
State Road Network (ton
CO
2
)
182,438
616,357
2021-
2030
2020-
2037
The additional price of the KVS mixture has also been investigated. Also, Deloitte has investigated
what the price development would be if the usage of the mix were to be applied on a bigger scale. The
report of Deloitte is attached as an appendix in Danish.
DRD has organized workshops with the different contractors to understand their experiences with the
KVS mixture and to receive direct information about challenges and possible improvements.
60
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0061.png
Further economic perspectives have been analysed to place the added price of KVS into both socio-
economical analyses and into how the added price can contribute to a specific CO
2
-reduction related
to which stretch(es) KVS is paved.
In the context of socioeconomic analyses, KVS proved to be beneficial, seen from a socioeconomic
viewpoint, regardless of which of the four stretches was analysed. Generally, the higher the daily traf-
fic load, the more beneficial the socioeconomic results. Both in terms of return of investment for the
added price of KVS and KVS’ economic ability as a mean to reduce CO
2
(given through the results of
shadow price), KVS is proved beneficial to fund, also as an initiative to reduce CO
2
.
Three scenarios are given to illustrate different approaches of identifying specific economic optimums
to determine the rate and degree of paving KVS. Through these scenarios, the price (in DKK) to re-
duce CO
2
(tons) ranged from 319 to 9,490. These numbers clearly illustrate that KVS can be paved
more economically beneficial at stretches with high figures of daily traffic loads. However, the highest
degree of CO
2
-reduction is naturally linked to a higher degree as KVS paved, meaning the more KVS
is used as the pavement of choice, regardless of traffic load, the higher the CO
2
-reduction.
61
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0062.png
References
Bahia H. U., Friemel T. P., Peterson P. A., Russell J. S., Poehnelt B, (1998).
“Optimization of
con-
structibility and resistance to traffic: a new design approach for HMA using the Superpave com-
pactor”. Asphalt Paving Technology,
Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technolo-
gists,
Vol. 67, 189-232.
Pettinari M., Nielsen E., and B. Schmidt
(2017), “Alternative
Laboratory Characterization of Low Roll-
ing Resistance Asphalt Mixtures”, Airfield and Highway Pavements 2017 : Pavement Innovation
and Sustainability,
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480946.014,
Published online: August 24,
2017.
BS EN 13036-1:2010. Road and airfield surface characteristics
Test methods Part 1: Measurement
of pavement surface macrotexture depth using a volumetric patch technique
Louay N. M., Minkyum K., and P. Pranjal,
(2019), “
Effects of Temperature Segregation on the Vol-
umetric and Mechanistic Properties of
http://www.ltrc.lsu.edu/pdf/2019/FR_604.pdf
Asphalt
Mixtures”,
Final
Report
604,
Williams C. R., Duncan, Jr. G., and White T. D. “Sources, Measurement, and Effects of Segregated
Hot Mix Asphalt.”
Indiana Department of Transportation. Joint Highway Research Project.
FHWA/IN/JHRP-96/16, U,S, Department of Transportation, 1996, 316p.
EN 12697-31 (2007). Bituminous mixtures - test methods for hot mix asphalt - specimen preparation
by gyratory compactor.
EN 12697-26 (2012). Bituminous mixtures - test methods for hot mix asphalt - stiffness.
EN 12697-24 (2012). Bituminous mixtures - test methods for hot mix asphalt - resistance to fatigue.
EN 12697-41 (2014). Bituminous mixtures - test methods for hot mix asphalt
resistance to de-icing
fluids.
Pettinari M., Jensen B. B., Schmidt B. (2016a). ”Low
rolling resistance pavements in Denmark.”
Pro-
ceedings
of
the
Eurasphalt
&
Eurobitume
Congress
2016,
Prague,
dx.doi.org/10.14311/EE.2016.071.
Pettinari M., Schmidt B. (2016b). “Study of the influence of the
longitudinal profile on rolling resistance
th
properties of a test section in Denmark.”
TRB 95 Annual Meeting,
Paper #16-2649.
Pettinari M., Andersen L., Al-Qadi I.L. and H. Ozer, (2018), Impact of Surface Characteristics on Flexi-
ble-Pavement Rolling Resistance Utilizing the Circular Road Tester, http://amonline.trb.org/.
ISO 28580:2009, Passenger car, truck and bus tyres
Methods of measuring rolling resistance
Sin-
gle point test and correlation of measurement results
62
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0063.png
Sandberg Ulf S. I., Rolling Resistance
Basic Information and State of the Art on Measurement meth-
ods, Mod-els for rolling resistance In Road Infrastructure Asset Management systems, MIRIAM
report, 2011.
Carlson, A, Hammarström,
U and Eriksson, O: “Models and methods for the estimation of fuel con-
sumption due to infrastructure parameters”.
MIRAVEC Deliverable D2.1, April 2013.
Hans Bendtsen et al. (2018), Noise Analysis of Road Surfaces Optimized for Rolling Resistance, ISBN
(web) 978-87-93674-08-0, ROSE-rapport - Støjanalyse A01.docx
ISO/CD 11819-2:2017: Acoustics
Measurement of the influence of road surfaces on traffic noise
Part 2: The close-proximity method
Incentive, TERESA 3.0 (2013) Dokumentation, Transportministeriet, Incentive
63
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0064.png
Annex A Description of requirements
(intended goal) for the asphalt material
for the demonstration trials
The mix design for the rolling resistance optimised surface layer which has been developed and tried
during previous projects (COOEE, COOEE+, INNO-ENERGI I & II) has been converted into a frame
work for the specification for a variant of stone mastic asphalt in order to allow various contractors to
further develop their candidate of climate friendly surface layer. The requirements were intended to
follow as close as possible the requirements in accordance with the European product standard for
stone mastic asphalt, DS/EN 13108-5:2016 and fulfilling the Construction Product Legislation for CE-
marking. It was for these implementation trials necessary to have additional specifications because the
European product standard lacked possibilities to define certain important features. The most
important ones were the requirements for the bituminous mortar consisting of a polymer modified
bitumen (40/100-75 in accordance with DS/EN 14023:2010) in combination with specific mix
requirements (5.9 % added limestone filler and 1.5 % of hydrated lime with respect to the total
aggregate part of the mix).
The document of the requirements (in Danish) can be found on the following pages as it was
presented to the contractors for the three demonstration trials KLIVE18#01., KLIVE18#02 and
KLIVE18#03.
One of the contractors was allowed to replace the 1.5 % of hydrated lime with 1.5 % additional
limestone filler + addition of 0.3 % of adhesion improving agent (TAS) after demonstrating that this
change would not have an impact on the moisture sensitivity of the material and fulfilling the functional
requirement.
64
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0065.png
65
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0066.png
66
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0067.png
67
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0068.png
Annex B Requirements in tendering
document for motorway M30
(Entreprise 79)
Below the requirements for climate friendly surface layer in the tendering document for motorway M30
is inserted. There is a correction
in Danish text in paragraph 2.2.0: Twice , change “asfaltmix” to read
“stenmaterialet”.
68
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0069.png
69
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0070.png
70
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0071.png
71
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0072.png
72
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0073.png
73
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0074.png
74
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0075.png
Annex C Overview table of bituminous
binders
75
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0076.png
Bitumen
Testmethod
Penetration at 25 °C
Softening Point Ring & Ball
Elastic Recovery at 10 °C
elongation or length at rupture
Force Ductility at 5 °C
elongation or length at rupture
Rheology - DSR (-10 °C - 100 °C ; 0,01 Hz - 30 Hz)
Rheology - MSCRT (50 °C,. 60 °C & 70 °C)
Infrared spectroscopy
Ash or remaining filler content
Standard
DS/EN 1426:2015
DS/EN 1427:2015
DS/EN 13398:2017
DS/EN 13589:2018
DS/EN 14770:2012
DS/EN 16659:2015
In-house, gravimetric, 430 °C
Data/datafil available
Data/datafile not available
Data not expected
Unit
0,1 x mm
°C
%
mm
J/cm
2
mm
MPa & °
%
Absorbans
%
Original bitumen
81
70,6
86,8
200
3,28
400
KLIVE18#01
Asphalt
Recovered
binder
54
61,2
75
200
5,11
400
Contractor's data
Specification
40-100
> 75
Bitumen
Original bitumen
71
76,6
77,8
200
6,89
rupture at 335
KLIVE18#02
Asphalt
Recovered
binder
47
75,2
78,3
200
Contractor's data
Specification
40 - 100
80,0
Bitumen
Original bitumen
64
76,0
79,8
200
7,18
rupture 295-390
KLIVE18#03
Asphalt
Recovered
binder
54
75,4
76,3
200
Contractor's data
40 - 100
80
1,02
0,67
0,60
0,58
0,72
Bitumen
Testmethod
Penetration at 25 °C
Softening Point Ring & Ball
Elastic Recovery at 10 °C
elongation or length at rupture
Force Ductility at 5 °C
elongation or length at rupture
Rheology - DSR (-10 °C - 100 °C ; 0,01 Hz - 30 Hz)
Rheology - MSCRT (50 °C,. 60 °C & 70 °C)
Infrared spectroscopy
Ash or remaining filler content
Standard
DS/EN 1426:2015
DS/EN 1427:2015
DS/EN 13398:2017
DS/EN 13589:2018
DS/EN 14770:2012
DS/EN 16659:2015
In-house, gravimetric, 430 °C
Unit
0,1 x mm
°C
%
mm
J/cm
2
mm
MPa & °
%
Absorbans
%
Original bitumen
88
69,6
86,1
200
KLIVE18#05
Asphalt
Recovered
binder
59
64,6
78,3
200
Contractor's data
Bitumen
Original bitumen
49
52,4
5,0
50 - 56
77
75,0
KLIVE18#06
Asphalt
Recovered
binder
38
54,2
0
0
Contractor's data
Bitumen
Original bitumen
49
52,4
7,3
0 - 60
0
0
KLIVE18#07
Asphalt
Recovered
binder
31
58,4
0
0
0
0
Contractor's data
0,67
0,63
0,74
0,85
0,58
0,68
76
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0077.png
Annex D Overview table of asphalt
materials
77
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0078.png
Analysis
Test or characteristica
Binder content
Aggregate density
Marshall density
Marshall compaction temperature
Standard
DS/EN 12697-1:2006 or DS/EN 12697-39:2012
DS/EN 1097-6:2013
DS/EN 12697-6:2012
DS/EN 12697-30:2012
DS/EN 12697-5:2010
DS/EN 12697-8:2003
Unit
%
Mg/m
3
Mg/m
°C
3
KLIVE18#01
Contractor data /
specification
6,9
2,73
2,383
155
2,447
2,0
18,1
89,1
0,20
100
95
61
46
31
23
17
14
11
10,0
Analysis
6,7
2,726
2,387
2,451
2,7
18,3
85
0,191
100
95
66
40
30
24
20
17
15
12,4
2,423
1,58
7,7
KLIVE18#02
Contractor data /
specification
6,9
2,720
2,390
150
2,6
19
86
0,202
100
95
64
44
32
25
21
16
13
9,2
Analysis
6,3
2,916
2,536
2,610
2,8
18,6
85
0,193
100
97
62
41
29
23
21
17
14
11,6
2,588
0,83
0,1
KLIVE18#03
Contractor data /
specification
6,5
2,940
2,550
149 - 155
2,7
18,9
86
0,200
100
95
61
40
28
23
19
15
12
9,4
Analysis
7,1
2,723
2,348
2,434
3,6
19,9
82
0,204
100
95
62
42
28
20
16
13
11
9,7
2,379
2,28
19,5
KLIVE18#05
Contractor data /
specification
7,1
2,730
2,380
155
2,4
19,0
87
0,204
100
94
62
45
32
23
17
13
10
10,00
Analysis
7,2
2,720
2,376
2,429
2,2
18,9
88
0,205
100
94
63
45
31
23
18
14
12
9,8
2,392
1,53
2,6
KLIVE18#06
Contractor data /
specification
7,1
2,730
2,360
Analysis
6,1
2,702
2,320
2,455
5,5
19,4
72
0,172
100
94
55
38
26
21
18
16
13
10,5
2,424
1,27
43,9
KLIVE18#07
Contractor data /
specification
6,9
2,760
2,410
6,4
2,715
2,400
2,454
2,3
17,2
87
0,18
100
97
67
50
30
23
19
16
13
10,2
2,415
1,56
5,8
Maximum density
Void content
Void in Mineral Aggregate
Void filled with binder
VB/VS ratio
Gradation
DS/EN 12697-2:2015
11,2 mm sieve
8 mm sieve
5,6 mm sieve
4 mm sieve
2 mm sieve
1 mm sieve
0,5 mm sieve
0,25 mm sieve
0,125 mm sieve
0,063 mm sieve
Gyratory Compaction
DS/EN 12697-31:2007
Density after 200 gyrations
Void after 200 gyrations
Compaction Energy Index
ISTM modulus
10 °C - mean (std) Marshall compacted sample
DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex
DS/EN 12697-6:2012
Density of samples
10 °C - mean (std) [gyratory sample @ 200] DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex
20 °C - mean (std) [gyratory sample @ 200] DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex
10 °C - mean (std) [plate compacted, cored] DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex
20 °C - mean (std) [plate compacted, cored] DS/EN 12697-26:2012 Annex
Wheel Tracking Test at 60 °C
DS/EN 12697-22 + A1:2007
Wheel Tracking slope, WTS
Rut Depth, RD
Proportional Rut Depth, PRD
Mg/m
3
%
%
%
3,3
19,7
83
0,205
100
96
63
44
29
21
16
13
10
8,5
2,4
18,7
87
0,201
100
95
54
37
27
21
17
14
10
8,5
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Mg/m
3
%
C
C
C
F
F
MPa
Mg/m
3
MPa
MPa
MPa
MPa
mm/1000 cycles
mm
%
2,420
5.376 (334)
2.469 (238)
4.900
2.438
8.213 (806)
2.569 (137)
5.020
2,587
9.655 (641)
3.507 (207)
5.827
2,413
4.383 (281)
1.835 (120)
2,43
9.638 (637)
4.055 (507)
2,427
12.249 (1.269)
5.903 (809)
0,03
2,6
6,4
0,031
1,9
3
0,05
5
0,024
1,48
3,6
78
NCC
PEAB
VTI
TI
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0079.png
Annex E Metodebeskrivelse for termo-
grafisk måling - UDKAST
Introduktion
Denne metode beskriver, hvordan temperaturen måles på overfladen af vejfladen direkte bag
asfaltudlæggerens afretter ved hjælp af termografi. Termografi indebærer kvantificering af infrarød
overfladestråling. Den infrarøde stråling tilhører det elektromagnetiske spektrum med bølgelængder
inden
for 0,76
100 µm. Ved at sammenligne energi pr. bølgelængde kan temperaturen bestemmes. Meto-
den kan anvendes til alle varmblandede belægninger.
Metoden er beregnet til at bestemme temperaturvariationen ved udlægningen af belægningsmasser.
Når koldere overflader end beregnet registreres kan der laves en opgørelse af risikoen for kvalitetsbri-
ster for belægningsoverfladen.
Asfaltudlægger skal monteres med udstyr til infrarød temperaturmåling af asfaltmassen umiddelbart
direkte bag afretteren. Målinger skal forekomme i realtid og kontinuert under udlægningen, for alle
varmblandede asfaltsektioner der falder ind under den givne entreprise. Heraf skal entreprenøren
levere data der inkluderer temperaturmateriale med tilhørende GPS-koordinater, mv.
Formålet er at evaluere fordelene ved at monitorere og dokumentere temperaturfeltet af asfalten der
lægges ud. Herved skal kvalitetssikringen af asfaltarbejder med varmblandet asfalt tilføjes et led, der
har potentiale til at medfør en forøget kvalitet af de belægninger der lægges ud.
For entreprenøren kan monitoreringen i realtid på sigt give entreprenøren mulighed for at optimere på
de metoder de har der påvirker asfaltens temperatur ved udlægningen. Dette kan være under selve
udlægningen, eller ved en daglig gennemgang og analyse af de termiske data der indsamles ved as-
faltarbejder. Resultatet heraf vil være asfaltlag der er bedre komprimeret end ellers.
79
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0080.png
Begrebsforklaring
Belægningspassets bredde
Ordet refererer til bredden på asfaltoverfladen
som udlæggeren efterlader bag sig ved en enkelt
udlægning. I daglig tale anvendes ordet også
bare for overfladen efterladt bag udlæggeren dog
uden at længden er klart defineret. Passets kan-
ter er de samme som belægningsoverfladen kan-
ter efter passet.
Vinklen mellem belægningsoverfladens normal og
kameraets centerlinje ved måling.
Banebredde fra den ene kant til den anden af
belægningen bag udlæggeren.
Den måleværdi,
, som registreres indenfor
maksimalt 2 sekunder. Måleværdien er en mid-
delværdi af temperaturen fra flere måloverflader.
Den overflade som momentant aflæses og giver
en målværdi.
Centerpunktet af en måloverflade
Termisk segregation er temperaturforskelle i
varmblandet asfalt ved udlægning, der kan forår-
sage præmature skader, grundet øget modstand
mod komprimering og arealer med forøget hul-
rumsprocent.
Temperaturforskel i asfaltmikset der kan forårsa-
ge termisk segregation. Temperaturdifferentialet
må ikke spænde over mere end ±14 °C ift. den
omkringliggende asfaltmasse.
Belægningsoverflade som inkluderer enkelte mål-
te niveauer der er lavere end de definerede vær-
dier for maksimale temperaturdifferentialer eller
ophørstemperatur. Dette set ift. gennemsnittet af
omkringliggende målinger der ligger indenfor
10
cm².
Overflader der udføres koldere end den optimale
temperatur er også risikomålinger.
Den summerede overflade af sammenhængende
risikomålinger, for den analyserede belægnings-
sektion. Er det summerede risikoareal mere end
10 cm²
overgår det til beregning af risikoandel.
Det summerede risikoareal, af arealer der over-
skrider
10 cm²,
for evalueringsområdet i relation
til den totale belægningsoverflade, udtrykt i %.
Indfaldsvinkel
Målebredde
Enkeltværdi
Måloverflade
Referencepunkt
Termisk segregation
Kritisk temperaturdifferentiale (KTD)
Risikomåling
Risikoareal
Risikoandel
80
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0081.png
Udstyr
Kameraspecifikationer
Krav til nøjagtighed og opløsning:
Sensoropløsning
x pixels horisontalt (X-akse)
x pixels vertikalt (Y-akse)
+/- 2,0 °C
90° horisontalt
0 til 280 °C
0,1 °C
+/- 1,0 °C
45° til 90°
Nøjagtighed af målinger:
Minimumsvinkel for målevinkel:
Temperaturspektrum:
Temperatur opløsning:
Reproducerbarhed af temperaturmålinger:
Indfaldsvinkel:
Termokameraet skal monteres på udlæggeren. Det skal aflæse og gemme belægningstemperaturer
successivt mens udlæggeren bevæger sig fremad.
Kameraudstyret skal monteres bag på udlæggeren på en sådan måde at det er muligt at aflæse de
termiske profileringsmålinger indenfor
3 m?
bag afretteren på udlæggeren og i den fulde bredde af
udlægningen fra den pågældende maskine.
Det samme punkt på X-aksen, måles til en ny værdi på Y-aksen indenfor 2 sekunder.
Dette skal der redegøres for i dataleverancen om hvorvidt er overholdt.
Andet udstyr
Datalagringsmedie
Data skal enten gemmes på termokameraet eller i et andet datalagringsmedie således at det er muligt
at præsentere data efterfølgende. En datalagringsenhed skal være robust, forstået på den måde at
den skal være af en udformning og monteres på en måde hvorved det dataene er sikret!
GPS-udstyr
Positioneringen skal forekomme ved en GNSS RTK måling
Beslag til montering af udstyr
Der skal installeres fornødne beslag til at det af udstyret der skal fastmonteres kan installeres korrekt.
Dette vil i alle tilfælde betyde at IR kameraet skal fastmonteres, men hvad der derudover skal fastmon-
teres afhænger af udstyrets sammensætning og må af entreprenøren og leverandøren vurderes for
hver udstyrspakke.
Kalibrering, kontrol
Kalibrering leveres normalt af forhandleren af udstyret. En grov kontrol udføres ved en jævnførelse
med et indstiks-termometer med en præcision på ± 1 °C. Indstikkets dybde skal være mellem 10-20
81
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0082.png
mm. Kontrollen skal foretages med det samme efter termokameraet har registreret dets måleværdi.
Det er en grov kontrol fordi temperaturen kan falde med op til ca. 20 °C per minut efter asfaltmassen
forlader strygejernet.
Det mindste antal af disse målinger er et punkt fra første læs og et fra det sidste på den strækning der
bliver udlagt, dog mindst to gange dagligt. Koordinaterne for disse målinger skal registreres.
Registrering af data
Positionering
Måledata skal registreres samtidigt med de aktuelle længdemålinger, således at der kan laves grafi-
ske print efterfølgende.
Planreferencesystem skal være ETRS89/UTM32.
Højdereferencesystem skal være DVR90.
Positioneringen skal forekomme ved en GNSS RTK måling og med en nøjagtighed på 5 cm i planet
og 5 cm i højde.
GNSS positionen skal kontrolleres mindst to gange dagligt.
Antal målinger pr sekund
Det samme punkt på X-aksen, måles til en ny værdi på Y-aksen indenfor 2 sekunder.
Dette skal der redegøres for i dataleverancen om hvorvidt er overholdt.
Ansvarlige for dataindsamling samt dataejer
Typer af data
Skal der senere være krav om at data skal sendes ved en cloudløsning?
For enhver given række temperaturmålinger tilknyttet et koordinat værdi på Y-aksen (længdemålin-
gerne), skal der være data for hhv.:
Dato
[DD:MM:ÅÅÅÅ]
Tid
[TT:MM:SS]
Længdegrad
(decimalgrader, med min. 6 betydende cifre)
Breddegrad
(decimalgrader, med min. 6 betydende cifre)
Højde
Distance
[m]
Kørselsretning for udlægger
(vinkelgrad, med uret fra nord)
Hastighed for udlægger
[m/s]
Luftfugtighed
[%]
Lufttryk
[hPa]
Lufttemperatur
[°C]
Vindhastighed
[°C]
Bredde på venstre udvidelse af strygejernet [mm]
Bredde på højre udvidelse af strygejernet [mm]
Andre data påkrævet
Udlæggers stop undervejs og varighed af stop
82
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0083.png
Andre mulige data (ikke påkrævede)
Temperatur i sneglen
Analyse
Frasortering af fremmedobjekter
Ved evaluering skal datagrundlaget justeres for fremmede objekter. Fremmede objekter er typisk per-
sonale der passerer måleområdet hvorved den infrarøde stråling reduceres. Data fra fremmede objek-
ter som er mindre end 90 °C skal fjernes manuelt eller automatisk. Det skal dog tydeliggøres at disse
data ikke er relevante. Måleværdier under 90 °C ved varmblandet asfalt fjernes, det vil indirekte sige
andre objekter som maskinelt udstyr og personale som er kommet inden for måleområdet.
Evalueringsområdet begrænses til 30 cm fra belægningspassets kanter.
Rapportering af resultater
Afleveringer
Resultaterne af målingerne skal præsenteres i form af et profil med individuelle værdier, hvor y-aksen
refererer de aktuelle længdemålinger. Hver linje af data på x-aksen skal have datapunkter tilknyttet
beskrevet i punktet ’Typer af data’ under sektionen
Registrering af data.
Formater af disse afleveringer skal være som txt- csv- og/eller xlsx-fil.
Yderligere skal disse filer indeholde en data-header med følgende informationer:
Information i data-header for resultattabel
Beskrivelse
Entreprenør
Entreprenørens kontaktperson
Måle-operatør
Målefirmaets kontaktperson
Periode
Tid
Vejrdata
Belægningstype
Lag
Belægningstykkelse - planlagt
Belægningstykkelse
Gennemsnitlige realiserede
Lokation
Vejnummer
Kilometrering(er)
Fra km
Total længde af sektionen
Planlagt lagtykkelse
Fabrikant
IR system
Model
IR system
Fabrikant
Udlægger
Model
Udlægger
Laterale mellemrum mellem temperaturmålinger [mm]
Længdegående mellemrum mellem temperaturmålinger [mm]
Afstanden mellem infrarøde scanner og asfalten
Målefrekvens
#
Eksempel
Til km
83
TRU, Alm.del - 2019-20 - Bilag 63: Orientering om Vejdirektoratets rapport om klimavenlig asfalt, fra transportministeren
2103794_0084.png
Længde, strygejern basis
Længde, strygejern venstre del
Længde, strygejern højre del
Kommentarer
84