Beskæftigelsesudvalget 2018-19 (1. samling)
BEU Alm.del Bilag 331
Offentligt
2053587_0001.png
European Commission
Marianne Thyssen, Commissioner for Employment and Social Affairs
Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200
1049 Brussels
Belgium
Minister for Employment
Ved Stranden 8
DK-1061 Copenhagen K
T +45 72 20 50 00
E [email protected]
uk.bm.dk
CBR 10172748
Letter to Commissioner Marianne Thyssen regarding effective
implementation and enforcement of EU-rules
File No.
2017 - 7537
Dear Commissioner Thyssen
I would like to thank you for your reply to my letter following the Peer Review on
“The efficient transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU OSH legisla-
tion” held in Denmark in June 2018.
I am delighted you agree that proper enforcement of legislation transposing the
EU-directives on occupational health and safety is essential. I am also happy that
you note our experiences regarding the Danish chemicals legislation in improving
efficient transposition. I hope it can inspire
other Member States’
in their transposi-
tion efforts.
As alluded to in my original letter to you of 31
st
of August 2018, I believe there is
still plenty of work ahead if we hope to achieve a better functioning Single Market.
I would like to provide you with a few examples, illustrating how concretely a lack
of proper implementation and enforcement goes against the spirit of the Single
Market based on full, fair, and equal competition.
In the area of occupational safety and health, I believe the experiences uncovered
through the Peer Review without doubt indicate, there still appears to be situations
at the national level where employers are unaware of certain regulations let alone
aware of what the regulations encompass and which actions need to be taken to
protect the workers.
Yet, challenges in ensuring proper implementation and enforcement extend to other
areas of the Single Market, too. A questionnaire undertaken among members of the
Confederation of Danish Industry, shows that almost a third of the interviewed
businesses have experienced cases of a lack of market surveillance across the EU.
This seems to be confirmed in the area of services as highlighted by a recent report
by EuroCommerce entitled
“Single
Market Barriers Overview” which you may
have heard of. The report lists a number of national examples of flawed implemen-
tation and application that result in hindrances and barriers to the free provision
and free movement of services.
BEU, Alm.del - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Bilag 331: Orientering om brev til beskæftigelseskommissær Marianne Thyssen om effektiv håndhævelse og implementering af EU-reglerne
Unfortunately, these hindrances have not been sufficiently addressed and the report
therefore helpfully suggests what relevant actors, including the European Commis-
sion, can do in order to rectify the situation in each case.
Moreover, a recent report
entitled “Making EU Trade in Services Work for All” by
Copenhagen Economics shows that a full implementation and enforcement of the
Services Directive can add at least 2 percent to
the EU’s
GDP, showing the great
potential from uniform application, implementation and enforcement. I enclose for
your information both reports with this letter.
The challenges are not limited to the free provision of services, either. This applies
to the free movement of workers, too, as two recent reports from the European
Court of Auditors and the European Parliament illustrate. Both reports highlight
that more can be done in order to confront challenges related to the free movement
of workers. Granted, the Commission has taken important actions in this area
in-
cluding the proposal for a European Labour Authority which I welcome
but chal-
lenges persist, as the reports indicate in detail. I also enclose these two reports for
your information.
Another area of concern, are cases of dissimilar implementation across Member
States. A concrete example brought to my attention is the Construction Product
Regulation. According to the regulation, manufacturers can only market (most of)
their products if they have been marked with a valid CE marking and a so called
Declaration of Performance has been drawn up.
Despite the common EU-regulation, several Member States continue to require na-
tional certificates and documentation beyond the CE marking in national building
regulations. While not questioning the intentions of such national certificates for
reasons of safety or protection for example, the demand for additional certificates
can result in a heavy bureaucratic burden for manufacturers wishing to export their
products to these markets. One also has to ask oneself why the requirements of the
common EU-regulation are not sufficient if the national certificates cover the same
characteristics as the CE marking.
I naturally understand that the issues mentioned above do not limit themselves to
your area of competence within the Commission. However, I hope it provides you
with some food for thought in your discussions with relevant colleagues in the
Commission and highlights that the need for effective implementation and en-
forcement extends to many
if not all
areas of the Single Market.
While this is of course a matter for the next Commission President, I would en-
courage the Commission to strengthen the focus on implementation and enforce-
ment at the highest political level, e.g. by entrusting a vice president with strength-
ened responsibility for this area in the upcoming institutional cycle.
2
BEU, Alm.del - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Bilag 331: Orientering om brev til beskæftigelseskommissær Marianne Thyssen om effektiv håndhævelse og implementering af EU-reglerne
2053587_0003.png
A comprehensive and united effort across the current and upcoming Commission is
required if we hope to achieve a Single Market with full, fair, and equal competi-
tion.
I look forward to continuing the dialogue with you on this important matter.
Yours sincerely
Troels Lund Poulsen
3