Rosa Curling
Associate solicitor
Rosa Curling is an international and UK
human rights
and public law solicitor.
She is an expert in both areas of law, having advised, and led litigation, on issues such as freedom of
information, privacy, anti-bribery, EU law, torture, immigration and refugee law, modern day slavery,
right to life, right to death, welfare benefits, access to education services, death penalty, access to
health services, the rule of law, international aid, unlawful detention, climate change and environmental
law.
She has represented clients before the UK’s High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, as well
as several Tribunals, including the Freedom of Information Tribunal and the Investigative Powers
Tribunal. She has also represented clients before the European Court of Human Rights, the European
Court of Justice, some of the African Regional Courts of Human Rights and the International Criminal
Court.
Some of her previous cases include:
A and others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2)
in which the House of
Lords found evidence obtained by torture was not admissible in the UK courts.
Save Lewisham Hospital Campaign v. Secretary of State for Health,
in which the High
Court found the Secretary of State had acted unlawfully in deciding to close and downgrade
services at the Hospital.
WWF and Cornerhouse v. Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory
Reform
which challenged the decision taken by the Secretary of State to provide financial
support and assistance to Sakhalin Energy Investment Company (SEIC) for a project which had
already caused significant environmental damage and endangered the habitats of the Western
Pacific Gray Whale. A few months after issuing proceedings, SEIC withdrew its application for
support and assistance from the UK government.
UK Uncut Legal Action v. HMRC,
which challenged the decision of HMRC to let Goldman
Sachs off £20million worth of tax owed.
Help Refugees Limited v the Home Secretary
which is challenging the Secretary of State’s
failure to properly implement section 67 of the Immigration Act, a statutory provision by which
the UK government seeks to share the care of 95,000 unaccompanied asylum seeking children