Input / Output Metrics – National Fact Sheet – DENMARK
Years: 2014 & 2015
Absolute Value
Metric
Selected Indicator
2014
1. Defence Expenditure as a share of Gross
Domestic Product (GDP)
2A. Major Equipment and Associated
Research and Development Expenditure as a
share of Defence Expenditure
2B. Defence Expenditures Categories
Defence Expenditures (constant 2010
prices, mln national currency)
Major Equipment Expenditures (constant
2010 prices, mln national currency)
Personnel Expenditures
11,673
Major Equipment Expenditures
2,502
Operations & Maintenance and Other
Expenditures
Infrastructure Expenditures
220
3A. Implementation of quantitative national
targets
1,2,3,4,5,6
3B. Implementation of qualitative national
targets
7,8,9
4A. Share of Land Forces Personnel which
are deployable
4B. Share of Airframes which are deployable
Deployable Land Forces Personnel and
% of total
Deployable Airframes and % of total
48
4C. Share of Vessels which are deployable
Deployable Vessels and % of total
13
5A. Share of Land Forces Personnel which
are sustainable
5B. Share of Airframes which are sustainable
Sustainable Land Forces Personnel and
% of total
Sustainable Airframes and % of total
7
5C. Share of Vessels which are sustainable
Sustainable Vessels and % of total
7
6A. Share of Deployable Land Forces
Personnel deployed on NATO Operations and
Missions Abroad
6B. Share of Deployable Land Forces
Personnel deployed on non-NATO Operations
and Missions Abroad
6C. Share of Deployable Land Forces
Personnel deployed specifically for supporting
Assurance Measures (depicted as person-
days)
Personnel and % of total deployable
320
Personnel and % of total deployable
100
Within National Boundaries
0
Abroad
158
7A. Share of Deployable Airframes deployed
on NATO Operations and Missions Abroad
7B. Share of Deployable Airframes deployed
on non-NATO Operations and Missions
Abroad
7C. Share of Deployable Airframes employed
specifically for supporting Assurance
Measures (depicted as airframe-days)
Airframes and % of total deployable
3.30
Airframes and % of total deployable
2.27
Within National Boundaries
0
Abroad
738
8A. Share of Deployable Vessels deployed on
NATO Operations and Missions Abroad
8B. Share of Deployable Vessels deployed on
non-NATO Operations and Missions Abroad
8C. Share of Vessels (regardless of
displacement) deployed specifically for
supporting Assurance Measures (depicted as
vessel-days)
Vessels and % of total deployable
0.63
Vessels and % of total deployable
1.08
Within National Boundaries
0
Abroad
152
9. Fulfilment of NATO Command Structure
(NCS) positions
National NCS Positions
95
NCS Positions Filled
88
10. Fulfilment of NATO Force Structure
Headquarters Positions (NFSHP)
Number of Allocated Positions
44
Actually Filled Positions
44
11. Fulfilment of Immediate Response Force
(IRF) of the NATO Response Force (NRF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Contribution (%)
NATO
Guideline
(%)
2014
2
Rank
2015
22,633
2014
1.16
2015
1.14
2015
Middle
22,769
Middle
2,502
2,602
10.99
11.50
20
Middle
Bottom
11,771
51.27
52.01
-
Middle
Middle
2,602
10.99
11.50
20
Middle
Bottom
8,374
8,012
36.78
35.40
-
Top
Top
247
0.97
1.09
-
Bottom
Bottom
-
-
99.71
97.62
100
Top
Middle
-
-
72.67
71.02
100
Bottom
Middle
5,961
5,879
68.60
67.45
50
Top
Top
48
72.73
85.71
40
Top
Top
17
86.67
89.47
80
Middle
Middle
1,050
960
12.08
11.01
10
Top
Middle
7
10.61
12.50
8
Top
Middle
7
46.67
36.84
28
Top
Top
160
5.37
2.72
-
Middle
Middle
210
1.68
3.57
-
Middle
Top
0
-
2,250
-
-
Top
Top
Middle
Top
0.16
6.88
0.34
-
Top
Top
5.24
4.73
10.91
-
Top
Top
0
-
489
-
-
Top
Top
Top
Top
0.77
4.83
4.53
-
Top
Top
0.00
8.31
0.00
-
Top
Middle
0
-
281
-
-
Top
Top
Middle
Middle
95
92.63
92
96.84
100
Middle
Middle
68
100.00
67
98.53
100
Top
Middle
-
-
143.36
143.36
100
Top
Top
Base year: 2014 and 2016.
Reference: DPCS 2015 as of May 2016.
Contributions two years later than requested: adjusted at 80%.
Limited adjustments to address capability shortfalls of the contributed forces; would require more information from nations to get a more precise assessment.
Transformation and modernisation of forces addressed in metric measuring implementation of capability targets.
Does not address readiness discrepancies unless significant (Ex: contribution requested at readiness 4 and provided at readiness 9).
Measures degree of implementation of force goals (which seek to address qualitative shortfalls of forces and defence transformation and modernisation) within the required timeframes.
Can only be considered as a very rough measurement of the transformation and modernisation effort.
Measurement imprecise especially for capability targets with multiple requirements and capability targets with a very long implementation time