URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Udenrigsudvalget 2016-17
URU Alm.del Bilag 225
Offentligt

PARLIAMENT’S

ROLE

IN IMPLEMENTING

THE

SUSTAINABLE

DEVELOPMENT

GOALS

LIA

PAR

BOOK

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Global Organization of Parliamentarians

Against Corruption (GOPAC)

Since 2002 the Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption (GOPAC) has estab-

lished a network of like-minded parliamentarians who wish to combat corruption in their country

and globally. With chapters in 57 parliaments worldwide, GOPAC provides support, knowledge and

the exchange of ideas among parliamentarians at the regional and global level. Additionally, in

most countries the chapters provide an opportunity for parliamentarians from all political parties to

collaborate and break down political walls on a key issue – corruption; an issue which has a major

impact on the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals.

www.g op acnetwork.org

United Nations Development Programme

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has been the United Nation’s primary development

agency since 1965. UNDP is also the largest implementer of parliamentary support projects in the world,

working with more than 60 national parliaments. UNDP is dedicated to helping parliaments at both the

national and sub-national levels to fulill their mandate to implement the Sustainable Development Goals

through the provision of technical expertise, peer-to-peer sharing of knowledge, and high quality publications

and knowledge products.

www.und p .org

Islamic Development Bank (IDB)

Established in 1973, the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) is an international inancial institution created to

support development in nations that have a signiicant Islamic population. Unlike other similar banks, the IDB

is not regional and its membership covers countries in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. The purpose

of the IDB is to “foster the economic development and social progress of member countries and Muslim

communities.”

www.isd b .org

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Acknowledgements

The Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption (GOPAC), the United Nations De-

velopment Programme (UNDP) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) express their appreciation

to the principal authors of this parliamentary handbook, Kevin Deveaux and Charmaine Rodrigues.

Emilie Lemieux, Project Manager, GOPAC, Olivier Pierre-Louveaux, Inclusive Political Processes

Programme Specialist, UNDP and Abdihamid Mao, Senior Integrity Specialist, Islamic Development

Bank, edited and produced this handbook. Final editing was undertaken on behalf of UNDP by Julia

Stewart and Charles Chauvel.

The UNDP Hub for Arab States played a leading role in supporting the production of the handbook.

The UNDP Bangkok Regional Hub for Asia and the Paciic, through the work of Doina Ghimici, Pro-

gramme Specialist for Core Government Functions, shared relevant experiences from its region.

The handbook would not be complete without the invaluable contributions received by Dr. Gavin

Woods, Chair of GOPAC’s Global Task Force on Parliamentary Oversight, Akaash Maharaj, GOPAC

CEO and members of GOPAC’s Executive Committee: Dr. Naser Al Sane, Paula Bertol, John Hyde,

Romi Gauchan Thakali, Mary King and Hon. Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu; and Patrick Keuleers, Jos De

La Haye, Arkan el-Seblani, Claire Cabrol, Jason Gluck, Julia Keutgen, Biljana Ledenican, Melissa

Salyk-Virk, Natalia Shai, Nancy Fashho, Nika Saeedi, Mads Hove, Sandra Lopez, Sebastien Vau-

zelle and Kawtar Zerouali (UNDP) and Jean-Noé Landry (Open North).

Finally, the House of Representatives of the People’s Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indo-

nesia, through Dr. Fadli Zon, Deputy Speaker and GOPAC Chair, and parliamentary staff members

Herinoyo Adi Aanggoro and Endah Retnoastuti, made valued contributions, as did the Westminster

Foundation for Democracy and the parliamentarians and experts representing 12 countries who

participated in a pilot workshop from 30 to 31 August 2016 in Jakarta, Indonesia and contributed

their views and experiences.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Foreword

Sustainable peace and development are essential to the future of the planet and humanity. This

vision is laid out in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Agenda 2030), which aims to

end poverty, build peaceful societies and promote prosperity and people’s well-being while pro-

tecting the environment for current and future generations. Its unanimous adoption by United Na-

tions Member States in New York in 2015 requires these states to now translate the ambitious and

transformative Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into national priorities and to marshal the

required resources and build the necessary partnerships with civil society and the private sector

for successful implementation.

Parliamentarians have an opportunity, and a constitutional responsibility, to play a signiicant role

in supporting and monitoring SDG implementation. The Agenda 2030 Declaration acknowledges

the “essential role of national parliaments through their enactment of legislation and adoption of

budgets, and their role in ensuring accountability for the effective implementation of our commit-

ments.” Members of parliament are uniquely positioned to act as an interface between the people

and state institutions, and to promote and adopt people-centered policies and legislation to ensure

that no one is left behind.

The successful implementation of Agenda 2030 requires an integrated approach, partnerships and

participation through inclusive political processes and responsive, effective, accountable institu-

tions. It will require global and regional exchanges of experiences between countries to identi-

fy solutions for planning, budgeting, implementing and monitoring progress toward achieving the

SDGs, as well as tracking where and how funds are spent to curb corruption and assess the impact

of these initiatives on the lives of people – especially women and members of marginalized and

disadvantaged groups.

This handbook, produced by the Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption, the

United Nations Development Programme and the Islamic Development Bank, is designed to be an

easy-to-use resource that can help parliamentarians and parliamentary staff members play an ef-

fective role in implementing the SDGs. It introduces Agenda 2030 and lists good practices and tools

from around the world that can be adapted, as needed, depending on the national context.

The SDGs provide an opportunity for societies to engage in inclusive dialogues about our future to-

gether on the planet. Parliamentarians can play a leading role in facilitating this debate. We there-

fore invite parliamentarians around the globe to use this handbook as a practical tool to promote

engagement on Agenda 2030.

Sincerely,

Dr. Fadli Zon

Chair, Global Organization of

Parliamentarians

Against Corruption

Deputy Speaker, House of

Representatives, Indonesia

Magdy Martínez-Solimán

United Nations Assistant

Secretary-General

Assistant Administrator and

Director Bureau for Policy and

Programme Support, UNDP

Dr. Abdul Razzak

Khalil Lababidi

Director,

Group Integrity Ofice,

Islamic Development Bank

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Table of Contents

Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 10

Intersection of parliaments and the Sustainable Development Goals .................. 12

Parliaments and sustainable development

.............................................................12

Including parliamentarians in the Agenda 2030

....................................................14

The parliamentarian’s goal: Sustainable Development Goal 16

...........................16

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 16

II. Parliament’s role in development effectiveness

and the Sustainable Development Goals .............................................................. 17

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 20

III. Coordinating efforts for better implementation ................................................... 21

Making the Sustainable Development Goals a priority

and coordinating their implementation across government branches

................21

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 22

Working with other oversight institutions

...............................................................23

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 24

Working with national statistics bodies

...................................................................25

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 25

Working with international and regional bodies

.....................................................26

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 27

IV.

Lawmaking: Strengthening the enabling environment

for the Sustainable Development Goals ............................................................ 28

Identifying law reform priorities

..............................................................................28

Drafting Sustainable Development Goal-related legislation

.................................29

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 31

Budgeting for Sustainable Development Goal implementation ......................... 32

Annual state budget

...................................................................................................33

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 35

Overseeing Sustainable Development Goal budgets and expenditures

..............36

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 38

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

VI.

Monitoring implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals.................. 39

Committee oversight of Sustainable Development Goal implementation

...........39

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 42

Parliamentary inquiries

.............................................................................................42

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 44

Written and oral questions and interpellations

......................................................44

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 45

VII.

Representation: Engaging people and facilitating public participation ............. 46

Promoting participatory lawmaking

........................................................................48

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 49

Facilitating participatory budgeting

.........................................................................50

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 50

Public input into monitoring implementation of laws and policies

......................51

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 52

Facilitating participatory Sustainable Development Goal implementation

at the local level

.........................................................................................................52

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 53

VIII. Parliament’s role in localization of SDGs .......................................................... 54

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 55

IX.

Role of parliamentary staff members................................................................ 56

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 57

Role of parliamentary political party groups .................................................... 58

Party groups

................................................................................................................58

Cross-party groups

....................................................................................................59

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 59

XI.

Building the capacity of parliamentarians and staff members

on Sustainable Development Goals ................................................................... 60

Questions for relection ........................................................................................................... 62

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Executive summary

This handbook has been developed for parliamentarians as a tool to promote parliamentary en-

gagement on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The SDGs were adopted, as an integral part of the ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for

Sustainable Development’, by all 193 Member States of the United Nations on 25 September 2015.

Relying on lessons learned from the Millennium Development Goals (implemented from 2000-2015),

the SDGs deine global, long-term development objectives to establish more sustainable means of

economic, environmental and social development in all countries. These new global goals, col-

lectively referred to as Agenda 2030, came into force on 1 January 2016 and have a target date for

achievement in 2030.

Sustainable Development Goals

Goal 1.

End poverty in all its forms everywhere

Goal 2.

End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture

Goal 3.

Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

Goal 4.

Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities

for all

Goal 5.

Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls

Goal 6.

Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all

Goal 7.

Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all

Goal 8.

Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment

and decent work for all

Goal 9.

Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster

innovation

Goal 10.

Reduce inequality within and among countries

Goal 11.

Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

Goal 12.

Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

Goal 13.

Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts

Goal 14.

Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable

development

Goal 15.

Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage

forests, combat desertiication, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss

Goal 16.

Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice

for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

Goal 17.

Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the Global Partnership for Sustainable

Development

The SDGs were adopted unanimously by United Nations Member States and endorsed by the exec-

utive branch of the government of each country. If the goals are to be achieved in any given country,

1 Acknowledging that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is the primary international, intergovernmental

forum for negotiating the global response to climate change.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

the country’s parliament must play a signiicant and informed role. The laws needed to create the

legal framework for the SDGs will have to be scrutinized and adopted by the parliament. The annual

state budget that allocates funding for SDG implementation will need to be passed by the parlia-

ment. The parliament must also monitor the implementation of the SDGs by the government to

verify that it is appropriate in national and local contexts and parliamentarians must represent their

constituents to promote citizen participation in the implementation of the SDGs.

The objective of this handbook is three-fold:

• further inform parliamentarians about the SDGs;

• share examples of how parliaments and parliamentarians can fulill their roles in imple-

menting the SDGs; and

• offer parliaments and parliamentarians a tool they can use to assess and improve their

current capacity for engagement in the achievement of the SDGs.

The handbook starts with an overview of the SDGs and why they are relevant to parliamentarians,

demonstrating that almost all the issues that come before a parliament for consideration concern

the SDGs. The handbook shows that engagement on the SDGs will be understood as integral to the

day-to-day work of a parliament, its staff members and parliamentarians.

Based on a review of the core functions of a parliament - lawmaking, oversight, and representation

- the handbook discusses speciic methods and tools that are being used by parliamentarians in

different parts of the world to actively deliver results for the people whom they represent that sup-

port SDG implementation. Innovative approaches to these core functions are highlighted.

Finally, the handbook considers where a parliament and parliamentarians it into broader imple-

mentation of the SDGs within the political system. Consideration is given to working with other

implementing institutions, such as the state auditor and the national statistics ofice. Since parlia-

ment operates as part of a broader societal system, the handbook also considers how other actors,

such as parliamentary staff members, civil society, political parties and the media can be engaged

to better achieve the SDGs.

Each parliament and its parliamentarians understand best the political and social context under

which they operate and are best able to determine what can and should be done to allow the par-

liament to play an active role in SDG delivery. By sharing good practices from other parliaments

and discussing the application of international standards to the work of parliaments, the handbook

is an opportunity to start a discussion among key actors within and outside parliament on how the

institution can best fulill its mandate.

Several innovative approaches that speciic parliaments have taken to engage in oversight of govern-

ment activity, including budgeting and expenditures, are presented. Some of these good practices

have the potential to be ‘game changers’ in terms of the role of parliament in achieving domestic ac-

countability and development. The examples note experiences with the MDGs (as prior relevant expe-

rience to the SDGs), inancial oversight and early work on parliamentary engagement with the SDGs.

At the end of each section a short series of questions is presented to stimulate relection on current

parliamentary roles and capacities in relation to SDG implementation as well as to foster discussion

on how parliaments can improve their ability to proactively engage in SDG implementation.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

I. Intersection of parliaments and the Sustainable

Development Goals

A. Parliaments and sustainable development

As the elected representatives of their people, parliamentarians have a critical role to play in driving

forward people-centred development that is relective of and responsive to the needs of their con-

stituents. In recent decades, there has been increasing recognition of the importance of engaging

parliamentarians in efforts to advance environmentally-sensitive, inclusive growth and sustainable

development. Through their constitutional mandates, for example, in making laws and overseeing

government policies and programmes - including enacting and scrutinizing the government bud-

get - and representing the views of their constituents, parliamentarians are valuable partners in

ensuring the accountable, inclusive, participatory and transparent governance that is necessary to

achieve sustainable development for all.

Recognizing the valuable contribution that parliamentarians can make to sustainable development

is particularly critical as the world moves towards implementing the new Agenda 2030 and its sup-

porting SDGs. The Declaration of Agenda 2030 is an inspirational document, explicitly committing

to “leave no one behind” and exhorting that all development should be “people-centered.” This

commitment to the social, economic and political inclusion of all irrespective of age, sex, disability,

race, ethnicity, origin, religion or economic or other status underpins both the Goals themselves

and the means for achieving them. Parliamentarians can be proactive in supporting these efforts.

In September 2015, world leaders gathered at the United Nations Sustainable Development

Summit in New York to launch the ambitious new sustainable development agenda that will

guide the community of nations over the next 15 years. Leaders endorsed the 2030 Agenda for

Sustainable Development, supported by a new set of 17 inter-linked Sustainable Development

Goals (SDGs). Agenda 2030 builds on progress made since the Millennium Declaration was en-

dorsed in 2000 and seek to pick up where the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) left off,

building on successes while setting out a bold new framework for sustainable development to

address still unmet needs.

Agenda 2030 is ground-breaking in its vision

for a more inclusive, prosperous and equal

world. It seeks to address the full spectrum

of development challenges facing countries

and communities, cutting across three crit-

ical dimensions of sustainable development

– the environmental, social and economic

spheres.

The comprehensiveness of Agenda 2030 is

complemented by the fact that it is express-

ly stated to be universally applicable. Rather

than focusing only on so-called developing

countries, Agenda 2030 recognizes that in an

inter-linked, globalized world, all countries

must be proactive in addressing the chal-

lenges of sustainable development.

Dignity:

People:

to insure healthy

lives, knowledge

and the inclusion

of women and

children

to end poverty

and ﬁght

inequalities

Prosperity:

to grow a strong,

inclusive and

transformative

economy

Planet:

to protect our

ecosystems for all

societies and

our children

Sustainable

Development

Goals

Partnership:

to catalyse global

solidarity for

sustainable development

Justice:

to promote safe and

peaceful societies

and strong

institutions

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Every country has a duty to implement the SDGs, and every country will be required to monitor their

progress and regularly report back to the global community on their successes and challenges.

Signiicantly, while there were only eight MDGs, 21 targets and 48 indicators, the SDGs cover a much

broader range of issues, with 17 Goals now supported by 169 targets. Progress towards achieve-

ment of these targets will be monitored through a raft of new indicators. These indicators are being

developed and overseen by the global Inter-agency Expert Group on SDG Indicators, made up of

national statistical ofices with the United Nations Statistics Division as its Secretariat.

Building

on lessons learned during the implementation of the MDGs, it is envisaged that these global indi-

cators will be used as guidance for countries to devise their own national indicators. Each country

is intended to be able to identify its own priority targets for action. It should then design national-

ly-appropriate indicators to enable local monitoring–including by parliaments–to assess progress

against national baselines and national targets for achievement.

Agenda 2030 is designed to apply to all people, with efforts to be made to disaggregate implemen-

tation to guarantee that activities target those most in need. This emphasis on “localization” of the

Goals is a critical new element of SDG implementation and, again, is based on lessons learned from

the MDGs. As with the tailoring of indicators to each national situation, implementation and mon-

itoring approaches will be customized to the national situation, and will then feed back into global

monitoring systems. SDG implementation and monitoring will also be tied to national development

plans and strategies to relect the speciic needs of the people in-country, taking into account de-

mographic, geographic, social and economic factors.

2 http://www.scidev.net/global/sdgs/news/un-sdg-mdg-indicators-consultation.html.

1 ¢¥%©

©)¡ ¢¦¡1£¨£

%¤ ¡¢§¡ 1

¨% §¢¦¥ %¤£¢¡ 1

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

UNDP Madagascar

Youth raise Global Goals at Social Good Summit in Madagascar on September 2015

Agenda 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals:

How inclusiveness and broad ownership was facilitated

Responding to the critique from some stakeholders that the MDGs were an internationally-driv-

en agenda, representing a “top down” approach to development, Agenda 2030 was developed

through a deliberately open and inclusive process of engagement, with and between United Na-

tions Member States, parliaments, civil society, the private sector and the public at large. While

the MDGs were developed by a relatively small group of development experts, Agenda 2030 was

formulated through inclusive public and stakeholder consultations designed to relect the aspi-

rations and needs of people around the world.

Over the course of more than three years, efforts were made to reach out to a wide range of

stakeholders across the globe to access their input, ideas and opinions on priorities for action.

For example, through the MyWorld (www.myworld2015.org) online platform, almost 10 million

people around the world shared their views with the United Nations on the priorities for issues

to be addressed through the SDGs. Efforts were made to systematically relect upon what had

worked during MDG implementation, what could be improved upon and what still needed to be

done over the coming 15 years. The inclusivity and openness of the process was intended to

build a stronger sense of ownership for Agenda 2030.

B. Including parliamentarians in the Agenda 2030

Many voices, including those of parliamentarians, helped to shape Agenda 2030. Whereas parlia-

mentarians were arguably brought into the process of MDG implementation and monitoring rela-

tively late, this time around there was an explicit recognition from the outset that the engagement

of parliamentarians – not only as lawmakers, but also as elected representatives of their people–

was critical for buy-in if the SDGs are to be effectively adopted, implemented and achieved. Par-

liamentarians were involved in assessing gaps, opportunities and priorities for action during the

formulation of the new development agenda through global, regional and national groupings. This

input was fed back into the inal production of Agenda 2030.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Global parliamentary inputs into Agenda 2030

Parliamentarians around the world actively engaged in the process of developing Agenda 2030.

Many parliamentarians were involved via regional groupings, through organizations such as the

Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the Association of European Parliamentarians with

Africa and the Southern African Development Community.

Globally, the Inter-Parliamentary Union supported parliamentarians to feed their ideas into ofi-

cial processes. As early as March 2013, the 128th Inter-Parliamentary Union Assembly adopted

the Quito Communique, stating: “Stronger parliaments will have to play a central role in the

implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. This will include ensuring that develop-

ment policies and plans are drawn up through participatory and inclusive processes, and with

regular progress reports submitted to parliament for review.”

Parliamentarians from 130 legislatures went on to endorse the Hanoi Declaration - The Sus-

tainable Development Goals: Turning Words into Action at the 132nd Inter-Parliamentary As-

sembly in April 2015. Parliamentarians explicitly committed to a more inclusive and open im-

plementation process going forward, stating: “[We] commit to doing our utmost to strengthen

national ownership of the goals, particularly by making them known to our constituents. People

must understand how the goals are relevant to their lives. As representatives of the people, we

are responsible for ensuring that each and every voice is heard in the political process without

discrimination and irrespective of social status.”

Subsequently, in early September 2015, the Fourth World Conference of Speakers of Parlia-

ment endorsed a declaration on “Placing democracy at the service of peace and sustainable

development: Building the world the people want.” This declaration stressed the importance

of ensuring that Agenda 2030 adopted a human rights-based approach to implementation and

would safeguard inclusive and equal outcomes for people.

For more details see:

Quito Communique: www.ipu.org/conf-e/128/quito-comm.htm;

Hanoi Declaration: www.ipu.org/conf-e/132/rpt-gendebate.htm; and

Declaration of 4th World Confer

arliament: www.ipu.org/splz-e/speakers15/declaration.pdf.

0 #" s ('e&$ #" e! e

As countries now look forward towards implementing the SDGs, it will be essential for parliamen-

tarians to proactively relect upon their role in SDG implementation and monitoring. While in some

countries national legislatures were closely involved in implementing the MDGs, the level of par-

liamentary engagement was globally quite variable. A key lesson learned from MDG implemen-

tation concerns the central role that parliamentarians can and should play in ensuring that SDG

implementation relects the diverse needs of the constituents they are elected to represent, and

beneits all groups of people, especially the most disadvantaged. More than any other state ofi-

cials, parliamentarians have a direct relationship to the public through their role as elected rep-

resentatives. This provides an invaluable opportunity to promote domestic accountability for SDG

achievement that is “people-centred,” meaningfully addresses the diverse needs of the nation’s

population (whether considered by reference to geographic, social, sexual, ethnic, cultural or eco-

nomic categories) and beneits all.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

C. The parliamentarian’s goal: Sustainable Development Goal 16

While parliamentarians have a responsibility to support and monitor im-

plementation of all 17 SDGs and safeguard the integrity of Agenda 2030,

Goal 16, known as the ‘Sustaining Peace and Good Governance Goal,’ has

special signiicance for parliamentarians. SDG 16 aims to “promote peace-

ful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to

justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at

all levels.” Over the next 15 years, parliamentarians will have a leading role

in advancing all facets of this Goal. This will be done through parliament’s

mandate to make laws, oversee the executive branch of government and

represent people’s interests, as well more directly as one of the institutions speciically responsible

for ensuring accountability and inclusion.

While the targets under Goal 16 all have relevance for parliamentarians, Targets 16.6 and 16.7

directly cover their work. Target 16.6 calls for the development of “effective, accountable and trans-

parent institutions at all levels.” Target 16.7 seeks “responsive, inclusive, participatory and repre-

sentative decision-making at all levels.” To achieve these targets, parliamentarians will need to

explore different ways of improving their work processes and systems. For example, by opening

parliamentary committees to the public, releasing more parliamentary information, encouraging

better outreach by legislators and implementing speciic strategies to improve the position of wom-

en and members of vulnerable and marginalized groups.

Currently, two global indicators will likely be used to monitor this target: Indicator 16.7.1: propor-

tions of positions (by sex, age, persons with disabilities and population groups) in public institutions

(national and local legislatures, public service and the judiciary) compared to national distributions;

and Indicator 16.7.2: proportion of population who believe decision-making is inclusive and respon-

sive, by sex, age, disability and population group.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Has a report assessing the inal status of MDG implementation been produced which could

be shared with parliamentarians to enable them to assess achievements, gaps and ongoing

needs and priorities?

Have any awareness-raising or information sessions been held for parliamentarians on Agen-

da 2030?

Has your parliament formally endorsed the SDGs, for example, by debating and passing a mo-

tion or resolution in the plenary?

Has your parliament initiated a discussion on how it can work to support implementation of

SDG 16? Noting that parliament is an SDG 16 ‘custodian institution,’ has parliament developed

a speciic plan in support of SDG 16?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

II. Parliament’s role in development effectiveness

and the Sustainable Development Goals

Over the past 15 years or so, governments have been encouraged to concentrate more explicitly

on what has been called “development effectiveness.” Development effectiveness means ensur-

ing that countries make the most effective use of all their resources – both the national resources

provided by taxpayers, as well as Oficial Development Assistance (ODA) provided by development

partners, more commonly referred to as “aid”– in addressing sustainable development challenges.

Relecting upon the development effectiveness agenda and its contribution to MDG implementa-

tion, Agenda 2030 speciically incorporates statements on the importance of building partnerships

for impact, in recognition of the critical importance of ensuring that inancing for the SDGs is made

available and used most effectively.

Agenda 2030 explicitly recognizes the importance of developing processes that:

“will be voluntary

and country-led, will take into account different national realities…will help to mobilize the neces-

sary means of implementation and partnerships, support the identiication of solutions and best

practices and promote the coordination and effectiveness of the international development sys-

tem....; will be open, inclusive, participatory and transparent for all people and will support report-

ing by all relevant stakeholders; …will be people-centered, gender-sensitive, respect human rights

and have a particular focus on the poorest, most vulnerable and those furthest behind.”

Building partnerships for development

Agenda 2030 clearly recognizes that identifying processes and means of implementation will

be critical to the success of the entire framework. To this end, the inal SDG–Goal 17–sets out

how Agenda 2030 should be advanced, prioritizing “revitalizing global partnerships for devel-

opment.” Goal 17 recognizes that development is not just about ODA, but must take a broader

approach to ensuring that efforts are sustainable, locally-driven and owned.

Speciically, Goal 17 identiies a range of high-level global priorities, including making progress

on debt reduction for highly indebted countries, ensuring access to barrier-free trade, promot-

ing private sector investment and enhancing global macroeconomic stability. It also highlights

the importance of capacity building to empower national actors to more effectively harness

international frameworks.

ODA often accounts for a signiicant share of expenditures by governments in developing countries,

including a signiicant number of least developed countries and small island developing states. Ris-

ing scepticism about the effectiveness of aid in many western countries is increasing the demand

for evidence about the effectiveness of such assistance. At the same time, questions are being

raised in developing countries about keeping such funds “off budget,” and therefore away from the

transparency, accountability and audit requirements that apply to domestic budget resources. As

a key accountability institution, parliaments have a crucial role to play in promoting development

effectiveness. Yet to date, ODA funding is still not always delivered through the annual state budget,

making oversight of its expenditure even more challenging for parliament.

3 http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiveness/busanpartnership.htm.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

It is important that parliamentarians are aware of all ODA provided to the executive branch of gov-

ernment and how best to monitor its implementation. This may require parliaments to more pro-

actively call for budget transparency and to verify that budget laws and regulations explicitly apply

to overseas as well as domestic resources. The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness (Ownership,

Harmonization, Alignment, Results and Mutual Accountability), the subsequent Accra Agenda for

Action (AAA) and the Busan Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (Busan HLF4) are mile-

stones in anchoring the commitments and obligations of partnership within a mutual account-

ability framework that recognizes that effective aid must align itself to country-led development

strategies. Mutual accountability aims to place the aid relationship on a two-way contractual ba-

sis, in which donors commit to providing effective aid and recipients commit to using aid well and

transparently. This governance result can only be achieved through mechanisms rooted in public

accountability, as the diagram below demonstrates.

To Recipient

Government

Executive

To Recipient Country

Parliament &

Civil Society

To Intended

Beneﬁciaries

Accountability

for Aid to whom?

To International

Financial Institutions

& Donors Agencies

To Donor Country

Parliament &

Civil Society

To Donor

Country

Tax Payers

ECONOMIC CONDITIONALITIES

Pre-2005 Conditionality review

MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY

Paris Declaration 2006

PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY

Forward-Looking Objectives

Several agreements have been endorsed over the last decade establishing key mechanisms and

protocols for greater development effectiveness. In the context of Agenda 2030, it will be useful for

parliamentarians to familiarize themselves with the critical development effectiveness processes

and frameworks below.

•

United Nations High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development:

The High Level Po-

litical Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF) is the United Nation’s primary forum for

follow-up and review of Agenda 2030. This forum is tasked with providing political leadership,

guidance and recommendations on all aspects of Agenda 2030 implementation and follow-up,

including by tracking progress, encouraging the formulation of more coherent policies in-

formed by evidence and country experiences and addressing emerging issues as they become

apparent. The irst annual HLPF took place in 2016 and included voluntary reviews of 22 coun-

4 http://www.agora-parl.org/resources/aoe/parliamentsandaideffectiveness.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

tries and thematic reviews of progress on the SDGs, including how effectively countries are

implementing partnerships for development effectiveness. Each HLPF will also host a range

of side events, including forums in which parliamentarians should be involved.

United Kingdom: Ensuring value for money through parliamentary oversight of

overseas development assistance

The United Kingdom, as a major provider of overseas development assistance (ODA), takes

a proactive and innovative approach to promote development effectiveness, which includes a

clear role for parliament in overseeing the delivery of ODA and guaranteeing value for money.

The UK Parliament has established an International Development Committee in the House of

Commons, which is a select committee comprised of eleven backbench parliamentarians. The

Committee has an investigative mandate. It sets its own programme and chooses subjects for

inquiries. For each inquiry, a press notice is issued listing the terms of reference and inviting

interested parties to send written submissions. For most inquiries, the International Devel-

opment Committee also holds question and answer “oral evidence” sessions with witnesses,

which are public.

In support of the International Development Committee, the UK has also established the In-

dependent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI). Although an agency of the executive branch, this

commission is functionally independent of the government and reports directly to the Interna-

tional Development Committee. ICAI undertakes independent reviews of UK aid spending and

its contribution to development results. When the commission produces a report, the govern-

ment is required to publish a response explaining whether it accepts, and how it will respond to,

the report’s recommendations. The International Development Committee’s Sub-Committee

on ICAI then holds a hearing on the report and on the government’s response.

ICAI’s mandate covers all UK overseas development assistance, whichever department spends

the funds. In addition to the Department for International Development, its reviews have cov-

ered ODA-spending departments such as the Department of Energy and Climate Change and

the Foreign and Commonwealth Ofice and interdepartmental funds, such as the Conlict, Sta-

bility and Security Fund and the International Climate Fund.

.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/international-develop-

ment-committee/role/ and http://icai.independent.gov.uk/about-us/.

www B44A @6o5 9832o765 42o3 2o

•

Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (2011):

The Busan Partnership is

an international agreement that represents a critical shift away from a one-way donor-recip-

ient relationship towards equal partnerships based on mutual accountabilities for guarantee-

ing impact from development funding. The Busan Partnership committed countries to four key

principles: (i) ownership of development priorities by developing counties; (ii) a focus on re-

sults and sustainable impact; (iii) partnerships for development that recognize the diversity and

complementarity of functions; and (iv) transparency, accountability and shared responsibility.

The Busan Partnership led to the creation of the Global Partnership on Development Effec-

tiveness Cooperation (GPDEC), a forum to secure accountability in the implementation of the

Busan commitments at the political level. The GPDEC takes its direction from high-level forums

held every two years that bring together political leaders, including parliamentarians. The irst

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

High-Level Meeting was held in Mexico in 2014.

The meeting hosted a speciic parliamenta-

ry forum that gathered parliamentarians from across the world to articulate a parliamentary

perspective on the key themes of the meeting, including domestic resource mobilization and

identiication of ways parliamentary participation can lead to better development outcomes.

•

Addis Ababa Action Agenda

(2015):

The Addis Ababa Action Agenda is the outcome document

of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development held in June 2015. Recog-

nizing that ODA is not the only–and not even the biggest–international source of inancing for

development, the Addis Agenda sought to initiate a more comprehensive consideration how

to most effectively mobilize the trillions of dollars estimated to be required to inance Agenda

2030. This new global framework covers inancing from sources such as development coop-

eration, international taxation, trade and a host of regulations and institutional reform. The

Addis Agenda links particularly to more effective means of SDG implementation under SDG17.

•

International Aid Transparency Initiative:

The International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI)

(www.aidtransparency.net) is a voluntary, multi-stakeholder initiative that seeks to improve

transparency over aid, development and humanitarian resources to increase their effectiveness

in tackling poverty. Its secretariat is hosted by a UNDP-led consortium. IATI brings together

donor and recipient countries, civil society organizations and experts in aid information who are

committed to working together to increase the transparency and openness of aid and to monitor

aid lows. The IATI Standard, a format and framework for publishing data on development coop-

eration activities, is available for use by all organizations in development, including government

donors, private sector organizations and national and international NGOs. Parliamentarians are

encouraged to review data provided on the IATI portal to learn more about development funds

being spent by and provided to their government, and about the sources of those funds. This

information can assist parliamentarians to more effectively monitor the budget and its impact.

Questions for reﬂection

•

If your country is a recipient of Oficial Development Assistance, is ODA included in the annual

budget as a form of revenue for the government?

How does your parliament monitor the distribution and use of ODA, either as a donor or as a

recipient?

Do you have a parliamentary committee tasked with overseeing your government’s implemen-

tation of development commitments, including impact assessments of aid received or deliv-

ered?

Does your parliament have the information and powers necessary to effectively review how

effectively ODA is spent?

•

5 For more information, see: www.ipu.org/splz-e/mexico14.htm.

6 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/frameworks/addisababaactionagenda.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

III. Coordinating efforts for better implementation

A. Making the Sustainable Development Goals a priority and coordinating

their implementation across government branches

The relationship between the parliament and the executive branches of government is complex.

To start, in many countries, a constitutional division separates the authority and responsibilities of

these two branches, as well as the judiciary, the third branch of government. While the executive

branch is responsible for enforcing and implementing laws and budgets, it is the role of the parlia-

ment to pass laws and review iscal plans. In addition, the parliament is responsible for overseeing

the work of the executive branch and ensuring accountability for its actions.

Political differences may exist about the best means of achieving a country’s long-term develop-

ment. But it is highly desirable to strive for a consensus across the political spectrum concerning

the broad goals and objectives for the development of a nation, even beyond the 2030 deadline set

for the SDGs.

A country’s commitment to implementation of the SDGs is made by the executive branch and all re-

porting relating to progress is oficially done by this branch. However, this should not mean that the

parliament is excluded from the process. From the start of SDG implementation, parliament should

be engaged in all aspects of planning for implementation. This is not only for political expediency,

but to foster deep ownership of the SDGs by the parliament and parliamentarians. When laws are

adopted or amended and budgets need to be adjusted, parliament should be able to debate the

changes with full awareness of the context.

The way that a government will coordinate SDG implementation across all of its areas of activity will

depend on a range of factors, including the political system of the particular country. However, spe-

ciic good practices can be identiied from past experiences of some countries, as described below.

•

National development task force or steering committee:

Some form of taskforce or steering

committee may be established by the government to oversee and guide SDG implementation.

While such a body is usually set up by the executive branch, good practice is to provide for

inclusive membership, not only by including representatives of parliament (both from the gov-

ernment and the opposition), but also from the private sector and civil society. If parliament is

represented on such a committee, it is important to establish a formal report-back mechanism

from its representatives, ideally via an appropriately-mandated committee to the plenary.

•

National development plan formulation:

A national development plan is a multi-year, strategic

roadmap setting out how a country aims to achieve sustainable human development. The na-

tional development plan outlines key priorities and indicators for measuring success. National

development plans need to be speciically reviewed and aligned with the SDGs to create a single

national blueprint for development that incorporates global SDG commitments and localizes

them to address national and sub-national priorities. Parliament should be engaged in the for-

mulation of the national development plan (or any other form of SDG implementation plan): it

should be tabled in - and discussed and approved by - parliament prior to implementation.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Indonesia: Supporting inclusive implementation of the Sustainable

Development Goals through a joint secretariat

Indonesia is fully embracing the need to implement the global development goals. Starting

with the MDGs, and now applying it to the SDGs, the government is working to put in place an

inclusive process for delivering on the goals. This will include the establishment of a Joint Sec-

retariat under a Presidential Decree that consists of senior oficials from the executive branch,

national civil society organizations, private sector, academia and extended invitations including

the parliament. The mandate of the Secretariat will be to formulate and implement develop-

ment goals at a strategic level. It also is a key venue for addressing any political or organiza-

tional roadblocks impeding the achievement of the goals.

•

National development plan implementation:

After its adoption of a national development plan,

the executive branch should regularly report back to parliament, normally on a yearly basis, on

progress achieved and challenges faced with the plan’s implementation. The parliament’s rules

of procedure should allow the government’s report to be referred to an appropriately-mandated

parliamentary committee for detailed consideration, including hearing submissions from the

public on its contents, and a report back to the plenary allowing the committee’s report to be

tabled and publicly debated there. At the global level, countries may also voluntarily produce

periodic progress reports that will be considered by the United Nations High Level Political Fo-

rum. These reports should also be tabled in parliament and discussed.

•

Coordinating with lead ministries:

In some countries, national development plan oversight

is led by one ministry, for example, the planning, inance or development ministries. The par-

liament’s rules of procedure should provide for a regular (ideally annual) review by an appro-

priately-mandated committee of the performance of such ministries, with a report back to the

plenary for tabling and public debate. Such a mechanism ensures that parliamentarians and

the public are aware of development implementation issues and challenges.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Is parliament engaged in the preparation of the national development plan or some other form

of SDG implementation plan through, for example, a multi-stakeholder steering group?

Are parliamentarians, including from the opposition, engaged in the implementation and

oversight of the national development plan, either through participation in some form of

cross-sectoral taskforce or through parliamentary processes, such as the parliamentary com-

mittee system?

Does the national development plan require tabling and debate in parliament before it can be

implemented?

Is the executive branch reporting regularly to the parliament on implementation of the nation-

al development plan, including SDG implementation?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

B. Working with other oversight institutions

Parliament’s role as a key institution for oversight of the implementation of laws and expenditures

by the government will be discussed in detail later in this handbook. However, it is important to note

that other oversight institutions exist that also have a role in monitoring the work of the govern-

ment. Some of these institutions may report to the executive branch, while others report directly to

parliament. No matter the speciic details of their mandate and reporting structure, coordinating

efforts with these institutions is vital to ensuring effective oversight of SDG implementation.

Below is a list of typical government oversight institutions.

•

Supreme audit institution:

The supreme audit institution refers to the agency of government

that conducts and publishes detailed inancial and performance audits of the component agen-

cies of the government. In some countries, this agency is known as the Auditor-General, while

in others it may be called the Court of Accounts (or the

Cour de Comptes).

Whatever its name,

the role played by the institution in monitoring government expenditures is critical, and its de-

tailed analysis beneits parliament as it goes about its work. Usually such bodies are required

to table their reports annually to parliament and a committee is then tasked with undertaking

a more in-depth review of the indings and reporting back to the plenary to facilitate the re-

port’s debate. This process can be used to look more closely at whether and how government

expenditures have been used to make progress on national development plan (including SDG)

implementation.

Brazil: Promoting cooperation between parliament and the state auditor

Article 72 of the Constitution of Brazil provides that the Federal Audit Court and the Joint Bud-

get Committee of Congress have a joint mandate to investigate irregularities in the annual state

budget and its implementation. The Joint Committee has the authority to request testimony

and documents from ministries and agencies of the government. If not forthcoming, the Fed-

eral Audit Court must render an opinion within 30 days on whether or not the request from the

Joint Committee is appropriate. If the Court agrees with the Committee, the ministry or agency

must comply with the request of the Committee to submit to its investigation.

See: Constitution of Brazil at http://english.tse.jus.br/arquivos/federal-constitution

•

National human rights institution:

Most countries have an independent body that promotes –

and monitors and investigates violations of - human rights. Given that numerous SDGs relate

to equality and the promotion of people’s rights and of the needs of marginalized groups, the

parliament should take a particular interest in the work of this agency. National human rights

institutions are often required to report annually to parliament, which provides an opportunity

for parliament to dig deeper – usually via an appropriately-mandated parliamentary commit-

tee - into their indings and examine whether and how a right-based approach to development

(including SDG implementation) is being taken.

•

National anti-corruption commission:

In some countries, one agency is responsible for all

aspects of anti-corruption–civic education, investigation, prosecution–while in other countries

a number of organizations may have mandates for these various components. Either way, the

parliament, particularly oversight committees, such as Public Accounts, Budget and Finance

or Government Assurances Committees, will exercise scrutiny over the work of the agency or

agencies concerned. In some parliaments, such as Hong Kong and New South Wales, speciic

anti-corruption committees monitor the work of independent anti-corruption agencies.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

•

Other oversight agencies:

Various other agencies exist that conduct oversight activities, such

as an Environmental Commissioner, Ombudsman, Advisory Council on the Status of Women

and Director of Public Prosecutions.

Tunisia: Independent constitutional body on sustainable development

The 2014 Constitution of the Republic of Tunisia provided for the establishment of several inde-

pendent constitutional bodies, including the Commission for Sustainable Development and the

Rights of Future Generations. Members are appointed by the Assembly of the Representatives

of the People (lower house of parliament) with the following mandate, provided by Article 129

of the Constitution:

•

The Commission for Sustainable Development and the Rights of Future Generations shall

be consulted on draft laws related to economic, social and environmental issues, as well as

development plans. The Commission may give its opinion on issues falling within its areas

of responsibility.

•

The Commission shall be composed of members with competence and integrity, who undertake

their tasks for a single six-year term.

•

See: Constitution of the Republic of Tunisia at http://tunisia-tn.com/constitution-of-the-republic-of-tunisia/constitution-of-tuni-

sia-independent-constitutional-bodies-2/.

Parliament should encourage, where appropriate, the sharing of evidence and analysis conducted

by one oversight institution with the other. It may also encourage the sharing of technical exper-

tise, such as the secondment or testimony of experts employed by the oversight agencies to a

committee of the parliament. The key is to recognize that each institution has its strengths and

weaknesses and to encourage cooperation in a manner that maximizes each body’s capacity and

avoids duplication of function and resources.

Questions for reﬂection

•

What are the independent oversight institutions in your country?

What are the oversight committees in your parliament?

Is there a clear and well-functioning relationship between your parliament and your country’s

oversight institutions?

What barriers prevent such a relationship and how can they be minimized or eliminated?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

C. Working with national statistics bodies

In many countries, one government agency or ministry is responsible for the collection, interpre-

tation and publication of key statistics, such as unemployment rates, annual birth and death rates,

cost of living and health indicators. For purposes of this handbook these will be known as the

National Statistics Ofice. A National Statistics Ofice is critical in the implementation of the SDGs,

for it is the central collector of data that will determine if, when and to what extent, indicators and

benchmarks for each SDG have been achieved. Some National Statistics Ofices have been tasked

with the development of global indicators for the various SDGs through the Expert Group on SDG

Indicators.

Mongolia: National Statistics Ofﬁce and the development goals

In Mongolia, the National Statistics Ofice has taken the lead in deining indicators for the SDGs.

The National Statistics Ofice has been tasked by the government to:

•

design methodologies for the national SDG indicators in conjunction with related

institutions;

compile national level statistics using data from the National Statistics Ofice and those

from relevant institutions; and

submit national baseline indicators.

The National Statistics Ofice then works as part of a team of ministries, including the Ministry

of Finance, to monitor the implementation of the Goals.

Source: http://www.unsiap.or.jp/programmes/ms_materials/ms12/T3_2_MNG_The%20case%20of%20SDGs%20%5bCompatibil-

ity%20Mode%5d.pdf

The collection of data related to progress in SDG implementation and the national development

plan should be clearly assigned to the National Statistics Ofice. Parliament should, through its

oversight function, verify that the necessary data is collected, processed and shared and that the

National Statistics Ofice has the resources and capacity to do so. Once collected and shared, the

data will provide evidence that can be used by parliament in its oversight of SDG implementation.

For instance, if malaria deaths have not decreased, parliamentarians may want to push for more

funding for malaria prevention. If the percentage of girls attending secondary school has not in-

creased, the parliament should consider what needs to be done to ensure the rate does increase,

such as new legislation, better enforcement or more funding.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Is there a National Statistics Ofice in your country?

Does your parliament have a mechanism – such as a regular review by an appropriately-man-

dated committee – to conirm that the National Statistics Ofice has suficient resources to do

its job, and that its technical work is free from political interference?

Does your parliament have access to data collected by the National Statistics Ofice?

How should parliament best use the data it gets from the National Statistics Ofice?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

D. Working with international and regional bodies

It is important for parliaments and parliamentarians to know that they are not alone in their efforts

to monitor SDG implementation to achieve key development objectives. Many regional and global

organizations work to promote the achievement of one or more of the SDGs. Some of these groups

may already be engaged with your parliament; if not, they can be engaged to support the work of

parliamentarians and parliament to build capacity and support your efforts to be a full and active

partner in the implementation of the SDGs in your country.

Regional Workshop on Parliaments and SDGs,

30 to 31 August 2016, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Below are six broad categories of organizations that support parliaments in building capacity and

with which parliaments can work to better perform their core functions in relation to the SDGs.

•

Inter-parliamentary assemblies and networks of parliaments:

As an institution, your parlia-

ment is likely a member of a regional or global network of similar institutions (e.g., Inter-Par-

liamentary Union, the Arab Parliament, Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, ASEAN

Inter-Parliamentary Assembly, Pan African Parliament, Southern African Development Com-

munity Parliamentary Forum, Parliamentary Confederation of the Americas). These groups

meet regularly to debate issues of common interest, and conduct workshops and provide hand-

books and other materials to educate parliamentarians and staff members on key development

issues and the role of parliament regarding them.

•

Networks of parliamentarians:

Networks of individual parliamentarians exist that work

through national, cross-party chapters and on regional and global levels to promote key de-

velopment issues, such as climate change (GLOBE International), renewable energy (Climate

Parliament) and anti-corruption (GOPAC). These organizations do not rely on institutional en-

dorsement for their work, but build international links between individual parliamentarians to

build a consensus for change.

•

Multilateral organizations:

Organizations that are often afiliated with the United Nations and

have a mandate to support the work of parliaments (such as UNDP, which is the world’s largest

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

implementer of parliamentary strengthening programmes) or have a speciic thematic man-

date (like UN Women, the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund and the

United Nations Population Fund). This group would also include the World Bank and regional

and thematic development banks (for example, the Islamic Development Bank). These organi-

zations will have long-term plans for support to the development of a country that can include

support for the capacity of the parliament. Such support brings with it world-class expertise

and knowledge.

•

United Nations human rights bodies:

Agenda 2030 seeks to realize the human rights of

all. Parliamentarians’ role in overseeing SDG implementation is mutually reinforcing with

their role to promote and protect human rights, including by domestication of internation-

al treaties and conventions and by ensuring compliance with international human rights

concepts in law and in practice. Participating in reporting to human rights treaty bodies

and to the Universal Periodic Review provides a good way for parliamentarians to engage

•

International NGOs:

Some international NGOs have a speciic mandate to work with parliaments

to build their capacity, for example, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs,

the International Republican Institute, the Westminster Foundation for Democracy and some

national political foundations and multi-party democracy institutes. Others have a sectoral

mandate that includes work with parliaments to achieve their goals, such as Transparency Inter-

national which is anti-corruption focused, and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative

that concentrates on promoting transparency in - and better oversight over - extractive industries.

•

Development partners:

Some countries provide funding to parliaments through bilateral proj-

ects in capacity building and infrastructure. These include the United States Agency for Inter-

national Development (USAID), the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID), the

Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), and the Korean International

Cooperation Agency (KOICA). Other countries, such as Kuwait, administer sovereign wealth

funds that are used to support speciic projects with parliaments.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Have discussions on SDG implementation been initiated in the parliamentary assemblies, as-

sociations and networks afiliated with your parliament?

What multi-lateral and bilateral projects are supporting the work of your parliament?

Should the efforts of these networks and projects be focused more speciically on the SDGs?

How do parliamentarians in your country contribute to the promotion and protection of human

rights? For example, do they engage in your country’s reporting to the Universal Periodic Re-

view and human rights treaty bodies?

•

7 See, for example, Human Rights Council 26/29, Contribution of parliaments to the work of the Human Rights Council and its univer-

sal periodic review.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

IV. Lawmaking: Strengthening the enabling

environment for the Sustainable

Development Goals

Implementation of the SDGs will require countries to use a wide

range of policy and programme approaches. While legislation is

rarely the complete policy response necessary to tackle a problem,

it is often a critical irst step in ensuring an enabling environment

conducive to action. Additionally, recognizing that the annual state

budget is also enacted as a law of parliament, the lawmaking func-

tion of parliaments takes on additional critical importance in terms

of ensuring that funds are effectively directed towards addressing

the most important national SDG priorities.

A. Identifying law reform priorities

Many SDG targets will require law reform to enable their achieve-

ment. One lesson learned from MDG implementation is the need

for a systematic approach to enable parliamentarians to undertake

comprehensive law reform to provide for the implementation of na-

tional development priorities.

Tunisia: Constitutional

and legal protection of the environment

A national constitution offers the strongest legal protection pos-

sible for a right and is one of the most critical acts of lawmaking

that a country will ever undertake. Although constitutional re-

form is not an everyday aspect of the work of parliamentarians,

in many legal systems, constitutional amendments are enacted

by parliamentarians and can be a useful tool for entrenching

development priorities in the basic law of the country.

For example, in January 2014, in Tunisia, lawmakers adopted a new constitution in the wake

of the 2011 revolution and embedded strong provisions in support of the environment and

addressing climate change, to safeguard that these critical issues were integrated into the

priorities of every subsequent government.

The new constitution made Tunisia the irst Arab country–and only the third country in the

world–to include an explicit constitutional commitment to the preservation of the envi-

ronment and a safe climate. This provision was included in the new constitution following

considerable lobbying by a group of parliamentarians - with support from an NGO called

Climate Parliament, working in partnership with UNDP – who were committed to actively

lobby for law and policy reform in support of environmental issues. The new climate clause

obliges the state to guarantee “a sound climate and the right to a sound and balanced

environment” and to “provide the necessary means to eliminate environmental pollution.”

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Subsequently, the same group of parliamentarians lobbied the government for a new renew-

able energy law. This law was eventually drafted by the Ministry of Energy, and sets national

targets for renewables as well as establishing an Energy Transition Fund to help inance renew-

able projects through the redistribution of fossil fuel subsidies. After helping to draft the new

law, the group of parliamentarians led the campaign to steer it through parliament; the law was

adopted in April 2015.

At the outset of SDG implementation, consideration could be given to undertaking an SDG Law Re-

form Needs Assessment, which could be used to review all SDGs and their targets. This should be

done to: (i) identify which targets require new laws or amendments; (ii) prioritize those law reform

needs and amendments; and (iii) create a medium to long-term legislative reform agenda to guide

on the drafting and enactment of laws. This could also be useful in promoting better coordination

of law reform in support of the SDGs. For example, gen-

der equality is covered speciically in SDG 5, but also cuts

across the implementation of every other SDG. As such, it

will be useful to assess the entire range of existing laws at

the same time to identify which issues could be covered by

the same law reform package, rather than tackling each

SDG separately, and then enacting separate amendments

and laws.

Another example is SDG 16, Target 16.5, which calls on

countries to “substantially reduce corruption and bribery

in all their forms,” with the United Nations Convention

Against Corruption providing a guiding framework for im-

plementing this target. That said, tackling corruption and

promoting public accountability underpins the achieve-

ment of the entire Agenda 2030. Signiicantly, a key ele-

ment of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption

and the broader effort to tackle corruption is ensuring

legislative reform to enable more effective prevention, in-

vestigation and prosecution of corruption. Reviewing all

corruption-related legislative gaps together could be very

useful in ensuring that reforms to address bribery and cor-

ruption tackle all aspects of these issues in one compre-

hensive legislative package.

B. Drafting Sustainable Development Goal-related legislation

Every legislature has different procedures for drafting, submitting and enacting laws. However, in

general, parliamentarians may be called upon to engage on three types of draft laws (described

below), all of which can be effective vehicles for promoting SDG-related law reform.

•

Government-sponsored draft laws:

In most parliamentary systems, it is the government that

will be responsible for drafting a proposed law before it is sent to the parliament for consider-

ation. As the government moves forward with implementing its localized SDG plan, ensuring a

coordinated programme of SDG-related legislative reform will be critical. To this end, parlia-

mentarians can be proactive in pushing the government to take action on drafting a law. Many

mechanisms exist, such as Question Time, interpellations, written questions to ministers and

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

proposing a resolution or a non-binding motion which can draw attention to issues of public

interest. Committee inquiries can also be useful, and can have the added beneit of integrating

public consultations on the issues and enabling parliamentarians to provide concrete recom-

mendations to the government on issues requiring law reform and how they should be handled.

•

Draft laws submitted by parliamentarians:

In many presidential systems with a separation

of powers, and in parliamentary systems that are semi-presidential, members of a congress

or parliament may frequently draft and introduce proposed laws. Depending on the rules of

procedure, it may be dificult to get such draft laws listed for consideration. However, they

can still be a useful way of putting pressure on the government to take legislative action to

address SDG issues, enabling parliamentarians to call attention to particular development-re-

lated issues.

•

Citizen-initiated legislative initiatives:

In some cases, citizens and/or civil society groups

themselves may take the initiative to draft legislation, which they may then ask individual par-

liamentarians to take up and submit for consideration by parliament (see section VII below).

Although rarer, in some systems, it may even be possible for citizens to call for their own “cit-

izen’s referendum” on an issue; if successful, such referenda can be used to enact or change

laws.

Lebanon and Morocco: Legislating for a stronger anti-corruption legal framework

The Lebanese Parliament has been active in spearheading a push to enact a stronger national

anti-corruption framework that aligns with the United Nations Convention against Corruption.

In 2012, the parliament set up a sub-committee on anti-corruption tasked with working on spe-

ciic bills relating to corruption. The sub-committee worked in partnership with Lebanese Par-

liamentarians against Corruption and with support from UNDP. The sub-committees worked

on four draft laws. The irst was an amendment to the laws addressing illicit enrichment and

asset declaration, developed by the sub-committee working in collaboration with a multi-stake-

holder working group made up of representatives from the Ministries of Justice, Administrative

Justice, Interior and Finance, the Central Bank and other critical regulatory bodies, as well as

UNDP. The sub-committee has also worked closely with the National Network for the Right of

Access to Information, a multi-stakeholder advocacy group chaired by a Lebanese parliamen-

tarian, to draft laws on whistleblower protection, the Right to Access to Information and setting

up an Anti-Corruption Agency.

In Morocco, the country launched a new national anti-corruption strategy in 2015 and the par-

liament is now working to put forward critical pieces of legislation to strengthen the enabling

environment for tackling corruption. A new whistle-blower protection law, Freedom of Informa-

tion Law and a Conlict of Interest Law are all in the legislative pipeline and will give parliamen-

tarians an opportunity to make progress on SDG 16.5 by passing strong accountability laws and

monitoring their enforcement.

See: www.transparency-lebanon.org/En/WhatWeDoDetails/5/12/0.

8 See the Finland Citizen Initiative: https://www.eduskunta.i/EN/lakiensaataminen/kansalaisaloite/Pages/default.aspx.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

UNDP Tunisia

Debates of the Tunisian Constitution, 20th january 2014. Photo: Olivier Pierre–Louveaux.

Ideally, proposed draft laws dealing with development-related issues will explicitly identify whether

and how they support Agenda 2030 and speciic SDGs and their targets. This could be included in

the explanatory memorandum to the draft law and in the speech introducing the draft law. Cur-

rently, however, this is not common practice. To address this, parliaments themselves may wish

to commission an SDG Impact Analysis from their own parliamentary secretariats to identify how

the proposed draft law impacts on SDG achievement. Alternatively, the rules of procedure can be

amended to require the sponsor of the law to produce such an analysis when the draft law is intro-

duced. Some countries already undertake socio-economic, environmental, and gender impact as-

sessments of draft laws. Lessons learned indicate that such a process can be systematized through

the adoption of a simple checklist, which can then be applied by the parliamentary secretariat to

each draft law produced for consideration. Parliamentarians can then use this information to iden-

tify areas for amendment.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Do parliamentarians have suficient legal and procedural avenues and legislative capacities to

initiate, consider and amend legislation to support the SDGs?

Has the government or parliament undertaken (or do they plan to undertake) a review of the

law reforms required to implement the SDGs which can inform parliament’s legislative agenda

over the coming months and years?

Does the explanatory memorandum attached to each draft law require an explanation of

whether and how the draft law contributes to SDG achievement?

Do the rules of procedure of parliament require that parliamentary committees consider all

draft laws to assess their contribution to SDG achievement? Does this occur in practice?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

V. Budgeting for Sustainable Development Goal

implementation

If the SDGs are to be implemented effectively, it will be critical that

their implementation is properly funded and that inancing is targeted

to ensure efforts reach the most marginalized and vulnerable. Differ-

ent forms of funding will pay for SDG implementation. This includes

private sector funds, funding from charities, ODA, foreign direct in-

vestment and revenue generated by the state, such as tax and customs

revenue. Parliamentarians should be aware of these forms of funding

and form a view as to whether the various sources of revenue are being

well-coordinated to avoid duplication and overlap.

The annual state budget law is the primary funding instrument that

every single country will need to use to direct resources towards SDG

implementation. As such, it is essential that the mix of lawmaking

and scrutiny that comprises parliamentary budget processes is de-

signed and implemented to most effectively enable parliamentarians

to engage in the process of budget formulation and endorsement. The

overarching question to consider is whether budget processes make

sure the budget really delivers outcomes within the SDG framework,

keeping in mind the overarching goal of ensuring that efforts are “peo-

ple-centered” and that no-one – especially from marginalized and vul-

nerable groups – is left behind.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

A. Annual state budget

The national budget approval process should be an ongoing annual cycle involving the executive

branch and legislature in estimating expenditures and revenues, applying available funds to priority

programmes and monitoring implementation and expenditure. As the Budget Cycle graphic above

shows, although the executive branch is formally responsible for developing the budget, parliamen-

tarians can nonetheless play a role in advocating for budget priorities in advance of (and sometimes

even during) the budget preparation process. In some countries, they can even use their lawmaking

and oversight powers to propose formal amendments to the budget once it has been tabled in the

parliament.

Most parliaments have some form of dedicated budget estimates or committee review process-

es which are intended to facilitate review of the proposed budget. This includes holding public

hearings with government oficials to drill down into the details of budget proposals and better

understand what the budget seeks to deliver. In some countries, civil society may also be involved

in this process, participating in hearings to provide feedback on the effectiveness of government

programme delivery and/or lessons learned regarding expenditure leakage or failure to reach ben-

eiciaries. Informally, parliamentarians can draw on civil society budget analysis or engage more

directly with their own constituents to identify which government programmes worked and which

failed to deliver beneits to those in need.

Additionally, following up with concerned government agencies and ministries on the recommen-

dations of state audit reports can usefully inform the contribution of parliamentarians throughout

the budget cycle. In some parliaments, this is done systematically via committee processes, under

the leadership of the public accounts committee and with the participation of sectoral committees.

Bangladesh: Budgeting in support of renewable energy

In Bangladesh, nearly 72 percent of the population lives in rural areas and more than two thirds

of households have no access to electricity. The Bangladesh Government has committed to pro-

vide electricity for all by 2020, but currently most of Bangladesh’s power supply is sourced from

natural gas and fuel imports, and much of the country’s new energy capacity is planned using

coal power plants. However, Bangladesh has made huge strides in creating a long-term plan

for funding renewable energy. In June 2014, the Bangladesh Government announced two key

budgetary provisions for the advancement of renewable energy in the country: (i) a budgetary

allocation of Taka 15 million (US$ 190,000) to fund a new Sustainable and Renewable Energy

Development Authority (SREDA); and (ii) the establishment of a Renewable Energy Fund of Taka

400 million ($51.65 million).

These concrete budget outcomes in support of SDG 7 (renewable energy) were the result of a

long campaign by parliamentarians. In September 2012, parliamentarians from different politi-

cal parties formed a local Climate Parliament Group, with support from the Climate Parliament

NGO in partnership with UNDP. These parliamentarians agreed on a set of priorities, including

to lobby for scaling up contributions of renewable energy for electricity production and to create

a policy, inancial and technology enabling environment to encourage the use of renewables.

In November 2012, the local Climate Parliament Group of MPs played a signiicant role in the

passage of the SREDA Act, a ground-breaking initiative that established the new SREDA as the

national focal point for the promotion and development of sustainable energy.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

In November 2013, the local Climate Parliament Group of MPs began their budget advocacy in

earnest. Parliamentarians met with and submitted a multi-party memorandum to key minis-

ters calling for adequate budgetary and others support for SREDA and the establishment of a

clean energy fund. This advocacy continued for the next six months in the lead up to the budget,

with Climate Parliament Group MPs meeting repeatedly with the Ministers of Power and Fi-

nance. Through their sustained advocacy, including well-timed interventions during the budget

preparation processes, the Climate Parliament Group of MPs secured the outcomes described

in the irst paragraph, above.

See: “Climate Parliament MPs Successful in Creating a Special Fund and SREDA for Renewables,” Press Release, Blitz Comprehen-

sive Tabloid Weekly, www.weeklyblitz.net/2014/06/bangladesh-climate-parliament-mps-successful-creating-special-fund-sre-

da-renewables/.

Notably, however, the legislation and rules that guide the budget process usually limit the ability of

parliaments to make major changes to the proposed budget. In many countries, parliament’s fail-

ure to pass the budget law as proposed can lead to the government falling. In others, parliament

can reduce a proposed budget allocation through an amendment to the budget draft law, but can-

not vote to increase expenditure. In yet other countries, parliament has more room to move funds

across budget lines, without exceeding the overall budget ceiling; but even this is usually guided by

strict rules concerning amendment.

Beyond parliamentarian involvement in the recurring processes of budget preparation and ap-

proval, parliamentarians can also support–via advocacy and the creation of an enabling legisla-

tive environment–budget reforms that better facilitate SDG delivery. SDG implementation requires

whole-of-government approaches. As such, parliamentarians can support innovative ways for the

budget to enable various forms of cross-government work.

Detailed inancial analysis and costings provided in support of a national budget vary across ju-

risdictions. In some countries, only quite minimal information is provided to explain the impact of

proposed budget measures. At the outset of Agenda 2030 and SDG implementation, consideration

could be given to reviewing the current budget documentation provided to parliament to assess its

adequacy in terms of providing guidance on how the budget is designed to progress SDG achieve-

ment. Parliamentarians, especially parliamentary budget and committee members, may then wish

to consider proactively working with the ministries of inance to agree on an SDG-friendly format

for budget documentation.

Rwanda: Promoting parliamentary oversight of ODA

In Rwanda, over the last decade parliament has instituted changes to the budget process to

ensure that more meaningful budget information is provided when the government submits its

draft inance law to parliament. The inance law now provides an integrated view on spending

organized by delivery programmes, rather than by government institution.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Since 2008, the Rwandan Parliament has also demanded that more contextual information be

provided with the budget, speciically on the ways in which the budget affects men and women

differently, although this information is only included in supplementary documentation. The

government has also compiled a consolidated list of national accounts that included all aid that

has reached the government sector in 2007, whether administered by government, donors or

third parties; this exposed under-reporting of aid on budget, as well as discrepancies with aid

databases. The exercise enabled the government to look more closely at the integration of aid

in the budget cycle, for all types of aid to the government sector, whether it was administered

through government systems or not.

Source: Balch, J. and Heim, K. (undated). The Poverty of Parliamentary Oversight of ODA, pp. 12-13, http://paperroom.ipsa.org/

papers/paper_2894.pdf.

It is also important that the budget documents include not only domestic revenue collected but

contributions made through ODA and international loans. In some countries receiving ODA, this

money is kept ‘off-budget,’ or in a separate ‘development budget.’ However, it is critical that ODA is

integrated into the national budget so that parliamentarians can properly assess the total budget

being allocated towards national development priorities and scrutinize proper accountability of the

entire budget, including ODA. Otherwise, there is a risk that ODA in some sectors will lead to un-

sustainable budgets, while other sectors remain under-funded. Additionally, it is more dificult to

validate public accountability for ODA expenditures if they are not included in the budget.

The role of partner country parliaments in improving the effectiveness of aid lows was clearly stat-

ed in the 2005 Paris Declaration, which explicitly recommends that: (i) partner countries commit

to strengthen the role of their parliaments in development strategies and budgets; and (ii) donor

countries commit to providing timely, transparent and comprehensive information to enable part-

ner country executive branches to provide comprehensive budget reports to their citizens and leg-

islatures. Despite this, efforts to bring ODA into the oficial budget have been variable, though some

good examples of budget oversight of ODA exist.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Does the budget submitted to parliament for review and enactment attach an adequate expla-

nation of how budget measures seek to progress SDG achievement? If not, what information

could be added to provide a better picture for parliamentarians?

Do the rules of procedure require the committees responsible for assessing the proposed

budget to: (i) assess whether and how the proposed budget contributes to SDG achievement;

and (ii) provide recommendations on strengthening the budget in order to more effectively

contribute to SDG achievement?

Do the rules of procedure or other conventions or practice require the government to consider

the advice and recommendations of parliamentary committees and to provide an explanation

to parliament for their response to such recommendations? Are there any processes available

to require a response from the government to the parliament’s budget advice and recommen-

dations?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

B. Overseeing Sustainable Development Goal budgets and expenditures

One of the most critical roles for parliamentarians in supporting effective SDG implementation is

to conirm that the funding allocated for SDG achievement is effectively and accountably spent in

a manner that produces sustainable and impactful results. This dovetails with the development

effectiveness agenda (as discussed in section II) in that the overall objective is to ensure that both

domestic money and international funds are spent in the most effective way possible. Development

effectiveness looks at issues of both value-for-money and actual results for people, especially the

most marginalized and vulnerable.

In most parliaments, budget oversight is undertaken by specialized parliamentary committees

mandated with reviewing the government’s expenditures at the end of the budget cycle. Although

these committees play a critical role as part of the domestic accountability framework in any coun-

try, they are commonly under-resourced, with both limited funds to carry out hearings and ield

monitoring activities, as well as limited staff member capacities to assist them with their analysis

and reporting.

In some countries, attempts have been made to set up some form of independent Parliamentary

Budget Ofice, or at least a budget unit within the parliamentary secretariat, to enable higher qual-

ity support for this vital task. Such units should be staffed with budget and inance specialists that

can provide expert economic and inancial advice and analysis to parliamentarians.

Morocco and Jordan: Supporting parliamentary budget analysis

In the Arab Region, several good practices come to mind of parliamentarians accessing support

from dedicated budget units.

In Morocco, the Budget Analysis Bureau supports both houses of Morocco’s parliament. The Bu-

reau has expanded the legislature’s role in evaluating and executing the national budget by pro-

ducing budget analysis papers which enable parliamentarians to better understand the budget

and provide more effective analysis. The Bureau reports to the House’s decision-making body,

where all political groups are represented, and the budget committee. The Bureau is mandated

to analyse the national budget and evaluate its execution, assess the executive branch’s policy

of public debt management, analyse the inancial impact of legislation and undertake research

about parliament’s inclusion in the budget process. The inclusion of parliament in the budget

cycle was recently extended from 70 days to six months. The Bureau responds to requests from

parliamentarians and is a reference for those drafting legislation, including amendments to

the national budget. Both budget committees in the bicameral parliament use Budget Analysis

Bureau products.

In Jordan, the Parliamentary Budget Ofice reports primarily to the Finance and Economic

Committee. Its work includes budget analysis reports and lists of questions for each segment

of the budget (used by the Finance and Economic Committee). The Parliamentary Budget Ofice

also provides reports analysing the performance of government based on budget data that are

used by all interested parliamentarians. Other committees have not yet made full use of the

Parliamentary Budget Ofice. Day to day activities include analysing economic news, developing

macroeconomic indicators, training parliamentary staff members, answering parliamentari-

ans’ inquiries and preparing reports about the government’s iscal and monetary performance.

9 http://www.awepa.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Safeguarding-the-Interests-of-the-People-Parliamentarians-and-Aid-Effective-

ness.pdf.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Source: These examples are taken from the McGill and World Bank online course on parliamentary development, Unit 5: Examples

of Independent Budgetary Units, found at

http://parliamentarystrengthening.org/EAP/PBO/Unit%205.pdf.

When the parliament is unable to source these skills from within its own staff members, consider-

ation can be given to seconding staff members from other accountability institutions. For example,

in some countries, the national audit ofice will second staff members to support the parliamentary

public accounts committee during their annual hearings. Such arrangements can be particularly

useful in small jurisdictions where such expertise is dificult to source. Consideration can also be

given to drawing on civil society to provide such analysis or to contracting economic expertise from

academic institutions.

In the context of SDG budget monitoring speciically, one of the key challenges that parliaments will

face is the need for disaggregated data to assess the impact of spending in terms of achieving the

overarching goals of the SDGs, namely to be “people-centered,” and to particularly target efforts

towards the needs of the marginalized and excluded. Notably, as discussed earlier, localizing the

SDGs will also be critical to success, and is necessary to ensure that funds and programmes are

properly targeted to those most in need. In this regard, parliamentarians have a critical role to play

in helping collect data on the needs of their own constituencies to feed back into larger national de-

velopment planning and budgeting processes. Facilitating two-way feedback loops will be essential

in helping to gather information directly from people.

This could be particularly valuable in many countries where budget data is poorly collected and

produced. At the outset of the Agenda 2030 and SDG implementation, parliamentarians, especially

parliamentary public accounts or budget and inance committee members, may wish to consid-

er proactively working with ministries of inance and the national statistics ofice to identify gaps

in current data collection and reporting and to work on improving how information is collected,

disaggregated and provided to parliament. Parliamentarians can also work to access information

about their home constituencies and the special needs they may have which need to be relected in

budget allocations and expenditures. Such proactive data collection could have low on beneits for

overall SDG reports, which will be required both to track progress against national SDG plans and

to feed into global monitoring systems.

One of the most challenging parts of budget oversight is tracking where the money was spent and

what impact it had on people’s lives, for good or for bad. While audit institutions can assist with

assessing whether funding was spent in accordance with laws and regulations, performance audits

are less common, though parliaments may want to consider providing these powers to their state

audit institution through law reform. Information and communication technologies are increasingly

being used to assist with budget oversight and accountability, including in support of parliamentary

oversight. By collecting and publishing inance and expenditure data, new technological tools are

now allowing data to be more easily disaggregated (e.g., by sex, demographics, geography) and

interrogated by parliamentarians and others interested in assessing where funds actually went.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Serbia: Utilizing innovative budget monitoring tools to track

Sustainable Development Goal expenditures and impacts

In Serbia the National Assembly is working with GOPAC Serbia and UNDP to create a budget and

expenditures portal that will enable better monitoring of public budget expenditures. The portal

draws on good practice from the Brazilian Parliament’s SIGA Portal, one of the best public in-

formation budget systems, which allows easy access to government databases on public plans

and budgets through a single online query tool. The Serbian National Assembly’s Committee

on Finance, State Budget and Control of Public Spending worked in close cooperation with the

Ministry of Finance Treasury Administration to agree to a memorandum of understanding and

protocols around sharing of data.

In addition to collecting raw data from the Treasury Administration, the Serbian Portal will

cross-reference data provided by the Treasury Administration with the State Audit Institution,

Public Procurement Ofice and Public Debt Agency by integrating their databases. Combining

public budget expenditures, audit indings and public procurement data is a global innovation

in budget oversight. Until the portal was introduced, no systematic mechanism for the Serbian

National Assembly to scrutinize public expenditures existed. The new portal allows for review

and analyses which should generate savings, as well improve public service delivery by identi-

fying waste and mismanagement. A pilot version of the portal started running on 1 December

2015. In the irst phase the portal will be tested by the Committee on Finance, while in the next

two phases it will be opened to all members of parliament and the public.

For more information see: www.rs.undp.org/content/serbia/en/home/presscenter/articles/2015/12/07/portal-for-monitoring-pub-

lic-ﬁnance-a-paradigm-shift-in-parliamentary-oversight-in-serbia.html.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Do public accounts or budget committees have the human and inancial resources to under-

take their own budget impact assessments (e.g, through site monitoring visits to assess im-

plementation of SDG-related programmes)?

Do the rules of procedure enable public accounts or budget committees to effectively interro-

gate government oficials to properly assess: (i) the effectiveness of government expenditures

on SDG-related issues; and (ii) accountability for funds spent?

Do the rules of procedure guarantee an effective response from government to the reports

and recommendations produced by public accounts and budget oversight committees?

What resources can parliamentarians draw upon to help them analyse budget expenditures

and assess their impact? Are there any think tanks / academic institutions / civil society orga-

nizations that could assist with such analysis?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

VI. Monitoring implementation of the Sustainable

Development Goals

One of the most important duties of parliamentarians–whether as

members of the government, opposition or non-aligned–is oversee-

ing the executive branch to ensure accountability for the eficient

and effective delivery of expenditures, laws and programmes to the

population. To this end, parliaments are usually given strong pow-

ers of inquiry, interrogation and oversight. Agenda 2030 recognizes

explicitly that ensuring accountability during SDG implementation

is of critical importance to guarantee that the Agenda is effective

in delivering results for people. In this regard, parliaments play a

critical role as one of the most powerful domestic accountability

mechanisms in a country. Parliaments establish the accountabili-

ty-enabling environment through the enactment of laws, but they

also have direct responsibilities for ensuring accountability through

their own oversight efforts.

A. Committee oversight of Sustainable Development

Goal implementation

Committee oversight is one of the strongest mechanisms available

to parliaments to engage in SDG implementation. Committee over-

sight gives parliamentarians an opportunity to assess in more depth

whether policies, laws and programmes are effectively implemented in support of the SDGs and,

if not, to make recommendations on how to improve implementation. Parliamentary committees

usually have powers to demand information and documents from government bodies, to interro-

gate government oficials and to hold hearings and examinations (including through ield visits)

to inform their understanding of how the government is discharging its duties towards the popu-

lation. Committees give parliamentarians the opportunity to undertake detailed examinations of

critical issues, by allocating more time to individual issues and engaging a wide cross-section of

stakeholders in their deliberations. In this regard, parliamentarians can play an essential role as

a link between the State and the people, including the most marginalized and vulnerable. Ideally,

committees consider public engagement a core part of their functions. When committees proac-

tively engage in monitoring and oversight they can be one of the strongest domestic accountability

mechanisms available to make sure that SDG implementation stays on track.

Considerable debate has taken place regarding how best to use the committee system to effectively

oversee implementation, irst of the MDGs and now of the SDGs. Early in MDG implementation,

there was much enthusiasm for the idea of establishing a single dedicated parliamentary MDG

committee with the overall responsibility for overseeing MDG implementation. Because the MDGs

affected so many aspects of everyday life, and because the SDGs are even broader in their appli-

cation, a concern with the single committee approach is that it may lead to a duplication of work

between it and the parliament’s ordinary committees.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Fiji and India: Implementing gender equality through

gender-sensitive parliamentary mechanisms

In Fiji, the Standing Orders of the Parliament have mainstreamed gender equality in the work

of parliamentary committees, recognizing that all standing committees have a role to play in

ensuring gender issues are considered. Standing Order 110(1) lists the authority of each com-

mittee to review draft laws, conduct oversight inquiries and other key functions. Standing Order

110(2) then states: “Where a committee conducts an activity listed in clause (1), the committee

shall ensure that full consideration will be given to the principle of gender equality so as to

ensure all matters are considered with regard to the impact and beneit on both men and wom-

en equally.” This clause has already led to a change in how parliamentary committees in Fiji

operate. In 2015, the Natural Resources Committee conducted hearings and produced a report

on the creation of a new park. To be in compliance with Standing Order 110(2), and so that the

voices of women were being heard, the Committee invited several civil society organizations

that work with women to make presentations on the topic and to provide their views on the im-

pact of the park’s development on affected women.

In India, the Committee on the Empowerment of Women is a dedicated parliamentary commit-

tee with broad authority, including to: (1) consider reports from the National Commission for

Women and report on measures that should be taken by the government to improve the status

of women; (2) examine measures taken by the government to secure women’s equality in all

matters; (3) examine measures taken by the government for education and representation of

women in legislative bodies and other ields; and (4) examine any other matters referred by the

Presiding Oficer of either House or of their own volition. In 2015/16, the Committee considered

issues such as: women in detention and access to justice; women’s health care; corporate so-

cial responsibility towards women; implementation of laws to protect women from domestic

violence; sexual harassment of women at workplaces and in educational institutions; insurance

schemes for women; empowerment of tribal women; and the condition of women workers in

the informal sector. All of these inquiries were undertaken in partnership with other commit-

tees with applicable terms of reference.

For more information on the Fiji example, see: Inter-Parliamentary Union, Gender Sensitive Parliaments: A global review of good

practice, 2011, www.ipu.org/pdf/publications/gsp11-e.pdf and Standing Orders of the Parliament of Fiji, www.parliament.gov.fj/

getattachment/Parliament-Business/Rules-of-the-House/SO-210316.pdf.aspx.

For more information on the India example, see: http://parliamentoﬁndia.nic.in/ls/intro/committee_on_empowerment.htm and

http://164.100.47.192/Loksabha/Committee/CommitteeInformation.aspx?comm_code=8&tab=2.

Many committees will already be engaged in activities that contribute to SDG oversight, as their

sectoral mandates likely cover one or more of the SDGs. To ensure more holistic SDG oversight,

however, consideration should be given to reviewing the breadth of the mandate of, and the prac-

tical aspects of oversight undertaken by, all existing committees. For example, most parliamen-

tary health sector committees will already be considering some issues covered by SDG3, which

concerns good health and well-being. But often, the work of such committees may be focused on

issues of immediate constituent concern, such as medical practitioner fees, or waiting times for

operations, and not so much on other matters within the ambit of the goal, such as health promo-

tion, disease prevention, and national health improvement strategies. Similarly, a parliamentary

education sector committee will almost certainly be already covering some aspects of SDG4, which

concerns quality education. But the emphasis of oversight may be on education sector salaries or

class sizes, rather than longer-term strategies to eliminate gender disparities in educational out-

comes. Focus and scope need to be addressed. If parliament decides to mainstream oversight of

SDG achievement through existing committees, the SDG targets for which each committee is to be

responsible should also be clear from the relevant terms of reference.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

If a parliament is committed to establishing a speciic SDG Committee to act as a focal point and to

take the lead in ensuring SDG monitoring and oversight, consideration could be given to mandating

an existing committee. For example, if the parliament already has a Social Affairs Committee or

Poverty Reduction Committee with a broad mandate to consider sustainable development or pover-

ty alleviation issues, this committee might also be well-placed to act as an effective SDG focal point

within parliament.

Such a committee could also help coordinate efforts by other committees to consider SDG-related

issues and could have a role in reviewing any national SDG reports produced by the government. Al-

ternatively, because the SDGs have a global element, the Foreign Affairs Committee may be tasked

with this focal point role.

In Romania, the Foreign Policy Committee has established a Subcommittee for Sustainable De-

velopment which has begun a series of consultations with relevant governmental institutions,

academics and representatives of civil society, with a view to establishing a roadmap for revis-

ing the National Strategy for Sustainable Development in line with the new SDGs.

Whatever decision is made, ideally, some sort of cost-beneit analysis and/or position paper should

be commissioned to consider the various options before parliament decides how it would like to

set itself up to engage with SDG oversight. Below are some advantages of using dedicated versus

sectoral SDG committees in parliaments.

Using existing subject committees

•

Committees are usually already well-established and will have funding and staff members.

Subject expertise will already exist within the Committee membership and staff members.

There will be no need to change the rules of procedure to create a new Committee (though

the rules could still be reviewed to more explicitly reference SDG oversight in the terms of

reference of each committee) and therefore parliament can immediately begin work on SDG

issues.

It gives more time to undertake in-depth scrutiny of legislation and to provide oversight in

relation to each SDG and target (compared to a single SDG Committee which would be re-

quired to consider all SDG-related laws and policies).

•

Creating a new SDG committee

•

The launch of a new SDG committee provides an opportunity for parliament to make a clear

public statement about the importance that parliament attaches to the SDGs.

The committee could act as a central SDG focal point within parliament, both for the govern-

ment to work with and for civil society and the public to direct their advocacy efforts.

A single committee may make tracking of SDG-related legislation easier (though the

breadth of SDG issues means that virtually all laws will now have some relevance to the

SDGs and should be considered in cooperation with the relevant sectoral committee).

Of course, it is perfectly possible to adopt both approaches: review and revise the mandate of ex-

isting committees to better it with Agenda 2030 and create an overall SDG committee to review

progress and coordination generally, or re-purpose an existing committee with the latter task.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Questions for reﬂection

•

Has your parliament undertaken a review of existing parliamentary committee rules of proce-

dure and mandates to make sure that the SDGs are part of each committee’s purview and to

assess whether and how the committees can be strengthened to support SDG implementation

and oversight?

If your parliament is considering setting up a dedicated SDG parliamentary committee, has:

• a cost-beneit analysis been undertaken, in particular to assess the extra staff members

and funding resources that would be needed to support such a committee?

• the idea been considered to re-task another committee to operate as an SDG focal point

committee?

•

Do sectoral committees have the legal authority and resources (human and inancial) to un-

dertake their own SDG impact assessments of proposed laws and programmes (including,

where required, through onsite monitoring to assess implementation of SDG-related pro-

grammes)? If not, what are the gaps in capacities and what can be done to address them?

Do the rules of procedure enable sectoral committees to effectively interview and engage gov-

ernment oficials to properly assess whether and how their policies and programmes have

contributed to SDG achievement?

Do the rules of procedure require an effective response from the government to the reports

and recommendations produced by committees? If not, how can they be improved to mandate

government responses?

•

B. Parliamentary inquiries

One of the strongest powers that most parliaments wield is the ability to initiate an inquiry into any

matter of public interest. Although rules of procedure may require different processes to be followed

to initiate such inquiries, these are a valuable tool that parliamentarians can use to draw attention

to SDG issues of importance. An inquiry can be conducted through an existing committee. For ex-

ample, the terms of reference of some committees enable them to initiate hearings into “any matter

related to the mandate of the committee.” Alternatively, parliament may pass a resolution in plenary

tasking an existing commit-

tee to undertake a speciic

inquiry into an issue. If there

is no committee with subject

matter jurisdiction, or when

an inquiry may require more

dedicated resources, a par-

liament may also choose to

establish an ad hoc or spe-

cial committee with a specif-

ic, singular mandate to un-

dertake an inquiry and then

disband upon completion of

its work.

UNDP India

India elections 2014. Photo:Prashanth Vishwanathan.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Parliamentary inquiries can be critical policy and monitoring mechanisms in support of the SDGs.

They allow parliamentarians to call witnesses, ask for and examine government documents, orga-

nize public hearings and debate in greater depth the issues related to addressing a policy problem.

Importantly, the process of engaging the public is of particular beneit–most parliaments allow

for written, oral and online public submissions, as well as for experts and others with specialized

knowledge to appear in person and present oral evidence. At the end of an inquiry, the committee

will produce a report, which represents a critical opportunity for parliamentarians to present the

government and the public with policy, legal and programme recommendations for action. Such

reports can be very useful in countries with divided politics to peacefully present different respons-

es to the same policy challenges, with majority and minority views enabling parliamentarians of

different political persuasions to still have an opportunity to share their ideas and insights.

Australia and the United Kingdom: Combatting out human trafﬁcking

It is a tragic reality that human traficking, particularly of women and children, remains a per-

nicious problem. The SDGs speciically call for governments to act to combatting traficking.

Target 5.2 calls for the elimination of “all forms of violence against all women and girls in the

public and private spheres, including traficking and sexual and other types of exploitation.”

Target 16.2 aims to “end abuse, exploitation, traficking and all forms of violence against and

torture of children.” To address this cross-jurisdictional, multi-faceted challenge, ensuring that

legislative frameworks and other supportive mechanisms are adequate is a crucial step.

In Australia, the Federal Parliamentary Joint Committee on Law Enforcement initiated an in-

quiry into human traficking in December 2015. The inquiry looked at issues of culture, law

enforcement, transnational crime, migration and technology, as well as identiied practical

measures to address these challenges. Twenty-one submissions were made to the inquiry,

predominantly from civil society organizations and women’s networks working on the issues.

In the United Kingdom, the parliamentary Home Affairs Committee initiated an inquiry into

human traficking in 2008 and reported in 2009. This is a useful example of how parliamentary

action can precipitate executive action. In 2013, following up on the recommendations from that

initial inquiry, the government tabled a Modern Slavery Bill. In March 2014, the parliamentary

Joint Committee on the draft Modern Slavery Bill then held additional targeted public hearings

on the issue. This committee had a narrower remit to consider whether the draft law would be

effective in protecting the victims of slavery and traficking and would indeed secure convictions

of the perpetrators. Signiicantly, the draft law passed in 2015 and in 2016 and a motion was

lodged in the House of Commons commending the inclusion of speciic targets in the SDGs

related to human traficking.

Sources

Australia: www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Law_Enforcement/Human_trafﬁcking; www.parliament.

uk/business/committees/committees-archive/home-affairs-committee/hacpn080118no21/; and www.publications.parliament.uk/

pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmhaff/cmhaff.htm.

United Kingdom: www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/draft-modern-slavery-bill/news/-evi-

dence-session-draft-modern-slavery-bill-1/ and www.parliament.uk/edm/2015-16/1255.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Questions for reﬂection

•

Do the rules of procedure enable your parliament to conduct inquiries that can be used to ex-

amine SDG-related issues?

Do the rules of procedure enable inquiries to effectively interrogate elected and appointed

government oficials to properly assess the effectiveness of government action on SDG-relat-

ed issues?

When inquiries are established, are suficient human and inancial resources available to

committees to effectively discharge their mandates (e.g., funding to organize public hearings

and staff member skills to undertake research, provide expert advice and produce quality

committee reports)?

•

C. Written and oral questions and interpellations

One of the simplest but most effective parliamentary methods for demanding accountability from

the government is through mechanisms that enable parliamentarians to directly interrogate gov-

ernment ministers regarding matters falling within their portfolios. These mechanisms differ de-

pending on the form of the legislature, but their aim is the same: to ask questions of ministers,

written and oral (Question Time), and to demand a public response.

•

Written and oral questions:

This is a process used in parliamentary systems, whereby a

certain portion of sitting time is dedicated to questioning ministers. Questions can be posed

by government-aligned or non-government members. In a parliamentary system, these

Ministers often already sit in the house as members. Follow up questions by other members

may be provided for. Often, the requirement to answer oral questions is reinforced by a sys-

tem where members of parliament may ask ministers questions in writing, and where min-

ister’s answers are published as part of the parliamentary record.

•

Interpellations:

Interpellations are used in systems with a strong separation of powers

where ministers do not ordinarily sit in the House and must therefore be summoned to the

parliament to answer questions from members. Accordingly, interpellations need to be sub-

mitted with notice to give a minister suficient time to arrange to attend the parliament. In

some parliaments, an interpellation can be linked to a motion of non-conidence in the min-

ister or the government.

Sri Lanka: Putting parliamentary pressure on the government to act on SDG issues

In Sri Lanka, Question Time is used as an opportunity for parliamentarians to ask ministers

about the progress of implementation on speciic SDG issues. Sri Lanka’s parliamentary web-

site represents global good practice as it serves as a mechanism for enabling parliamentarians

to publicly demonstrate their commitment to proactively overseeing SDG implementation and

enables people themselves to access information from the government on what is being done

(and not done).

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Parliamentarians from other countries might ind the parliament of Sri Lanka’s website useful

as a source of possible lines of questioning that they could consider asking in their own country.

For example, in 2014 a parliamentarian used Question Time to ask the Minister for Finance and

Planning for information on district poverty lines. The question was posed to the Minister as

follows:

•

Is he aware that the Department of Census and Statistics published the District Poverty

Line every month based on the minimum expenditure per person per month to fulil the

basic needs?

Will he inform the House of:

(i) the latest available oficial Poverty Line for Colombo District; and

(ii) the basic needs that are included in calculating the aforesaid poverty line?

If not, why not?

See: www.parliament.lk/en/business-of-parliament/parliamentary-questions.

Regardless of which form of questioning is used, these interrogatory mechanisms can be extremely

useful ways for an individual parliamentarian to raise an SDG issue of public interest in the House

and to demand an answer from the government on what it is doing in response. Questions can ex-

amine SDG planning and implementation processes broadly (e.g., What is the status of the prepara-

tion of the national SDG plan? When will it be tabled in parliament?), or can be much more speciic

and inquire about implementation of a speciic SDG or target (e.g., What is the government doing to

address issues of inequality in accordance with SDG 10?). They can even question speciic activities

in relation to a target (e.g., What is the government doing to strengthen the delivery of services by

the vocational education institution in XX province in accordance with SDG 4, Target 4.4?).

Questions for reﬂection

•

Do your parliament’s rules of procedure allow questions, written or oral, and interpellations to

be used in practice to meaningfully hold government ministers to account? If not, what are the

weaknesses of the current system and how can they be addressed?

Do non-government members of parliament get suficient time and opportunity to use ques-

tions, written or oral, and interpellations effectively? If not, what can be done to improve exist-

ing practice?

Are interpellations and their responses, and questions and answers from questions, written

or oral, broadcast and published on the parliamentary website? Are written questions and an-

swers provided for, and are these required to be published? If not, how can information from

these procedures be more effectively shared with the public?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

VII. Representation: Engaging people and

facilitating public participation

The legitimacy of a parliament and its members comes from the

fact that they are elected to represent the people of a country (or

state or province). The members sit in an assembly to make deci-

sions on behalf of all people. This means that the institution and its

individual members must conceive of and maintain active means of

engaging the public to routinely ascertain their interests, opinions

and concerns. To failing to do this can result in a threat to the legiti-

macy of the institution and can result in accountability dificulties at

the next election for the members.

Beyond the constitutional basis for parliaments to be representative,

practical and legal rationales exist for effective public engagement.

The SDGs speciically call for more inclusive government institu-

tions (including parliaments) through SDG 16 and call for political

inclusion of all irrespective of age, sex, disability, race, ethnicity, or-

igin, religion or economic or other status. Therefore, countries that

are committed to implementing the SDGs are implicitly committed

to building more inclusive and effective parliaments over the com-

ing years.

Parliamentarians cannot be experts in all topics that they will be

called upon to consider. Yet, they have a responsibility to those who

work and live under the laws that they pass and the budgets they

approve to make sure that people are widely consulted on processes that affect them. Greater con-

stituent input can create higher quality laws and budgets and is more likely to garner public accep-

tance and satisfaction. This does not mean that parliamentarians must agree with every constitu-

ent’s concern, but it does mean they are better equipped to perform their role when they have heard

from a broad cross-section of the public and then use what they have learned from consultations to

prepare for the votes they cast and the interventions they make in parliament.

The beneits of public dialogue on the work of the parliament applies equally to SDG implemen-

tation. It is critical that the legal frameworks established and the funding allocated to achieve the

various SDGs should be based on the insights and the perspectives of people who will be affected

by, and who will beneit from, such changes. The SDGs need to be understood by people as a set of

objectives that can make their lives and their communities better.

We have discussed speciic technical aspects of the work of a parliamentarian as a legislator–

working in parliament to achieve policy reforms in the national interest. However, the reality for

most members of parliament is that they are constantly being asked to respond to the needs and

concerns of people. A parliamentarian will receive numerous text messages, telephone calls and

personal requests for assistance on any given day. Responding to these requests can be a full-time

job in and of itself.

The challenge for many parliamentarians is to initiate and maintain a dialogue with citizens that is

policy oriented. The objective is to seek the input of constituents on an ongoing basis at both local

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

and national levels, to gain insight from their experiences and to ensure that the laws passed and

the monitoring conducted by parliament relects such interests and concerns.

South Africa: Public participation framework

Section 59 of the Constitution of South Africa (1996) states that the National Assembly must

“facilitate public involvement in the legislative and other processes of the Assembly and its

committees.” To put those words into action, a 2013 Public Participation Framework recognized

a hierarchy of public engagement based on the four levels listed below.

Level 1: Inform citizens of the work of the parliament and government.

Level 2: Consult the public and seek their input.

Level 3: Involve the public through the establishment of a dialogue.

Level 4: Collaborate with the public by creating opportunities for partnership.

Despite these constitutional provisions, recent academic studies have noted the use of courts

to enforce the provision when governments and legislatures have been remiss and when inclu-

sivity has been lacking in the public participation process.

Sources: http://www.parliament.gov.za/live/content.php?Item_ID=304 and http://www.krepublishers.com/02-Journals/JSS/JSS-

39-0-000-14-Web/JSS-39-3-14-Abst-PDF/JSS-39-3-275-14-1620-Mubangizi-B-C/JSS-39-3-275-14-1620-Mubangizi-B-C-Tx[4].pdf

Below are some different means by which a parliamentarian and a parliament can build a public

dialogue with people.

Local public forums:

Either within a constituency or a local community, a parliamentarian can

organize public forums, either formal or informal, in which people have an opportunity to provide

feedback on a speciic issue (e.g., a draft law under consideration; the state of education in the

community) or a more general discussion to solicit a range of concerns.

Public consultations:

As noted in Section VI above, parliamentary committees should be engaging

civil society and the public as they consider draft laws and conduct inquiries. Such consultations

can range from the informal (such as public forums and reporting sessions) to the more formal

(e.g., public hearings); and from the technical (e.g., surveys) to the simple (e.g., requests for sub-

missions via SMS). Consultation can also come in the form of virtual engagement, including online

feedback, surveys and social media.

UNAMA

Third Dai Kundi Annual Reporting Conference in Afghanistan on January 2012. Photo: Aurora Verceles Alambra

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Ghana: Connecting citizens to parliament and its application to the SDGs

In 2015, the Committee on Government Assurances of the Parliament of Ghana, with support

from external partners, launched a web portal that allows citizens to provide feedback on its

ongoing work and to raise concerns about government activities in their communities. Through

ofline and online tools, citizens have actively embraced the new format and it has resulted in

a committee whose work is more effective and more eficient. Such a ‘game changer’ allows

committees to directly connect with local concerns and guarantee that those voices are being

heard during deliberations.

Source: Ekow Essabra-Mensah, “Connecting Citizens to Parliament initiative records massive success,” B&FT Online, 24 May

2016, http://thebftonline.com/business/economy/19095/connecting-citizens-to-parliament-initiative-records-massive-success-.

html.

Party consultations:

Most members are also representatives of a particular political party. Parties

usually have a branch structure. Through such branches or through party-organized consultations,

a parliamentarian can gain insight into the perspectives of their supporters.

Civil society partnerships:

Depending on the subject or issue that is before the parliament for

decision, more than likely a local or national civil society organization exists that is advocating or

working in the ield. By partnering with one or more of these organizations, the parliament (or in-

dividual parliamentarians) can expand their reach and ensure that voices that might not otherwise

be heard are given the chance to provide input to their work.

Social media and new technology:

Broader access to mobile telephones and the internet by people

has opened opportunities for parliaments and parliamentarians to engage them in a dialogue on

the work of parliament and to seek their feedback and ideas on an ongoing basis.

Surveys:

With advances in technology, the cost of conducting a survey has been drastically reduced.

Parliaments and parliamentarians are increasingly using online tools to gather feedback from pub-

lic prior to deliberations on a draft law or as part of an oversight inquiry.

One-on-one and small group meetings:

Individual parliamentarians can arrange to meet with peo-

ple who have concerns or issues they wish to raise on a one-on-one or small group basis.

A. Promoting participatory lawmaking

Participatory lawmaking is the process by which a parliament, parliamentary group, committee

or individual member of parliament actively engages the public in the consideration and review of

draft laws that are before the House for consideration.

Normally, a draft law within a parliament goes through many stages of review. These include sever-

al “readings” or debates within plenary sessions of the House. It is in the committee stage–before

the parliament has developed and considered potential amendments to the draft law–that the pub-

lic has a substantial opportunity to engage with parliament and to provide input in a timely manner.

The most common means of public engagement is through a public hearing. In a public hearing, a

committee holds a formal meeting to which interested people, stakeholders, subject experts and

civil society are invited to provide oral and/or written submissions on speciic aspects or the entire

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

content of a draft law. These hearings usually include an opportunity for members of the committee

to ask questions of presenters and for replies by presenters.

But beyond public hearings, it has been found that a parliamentary committee can be more effec-

tive if it leaves the precincts of the parliament and conducts hearings in different regions to give

more groups and people the opportunity to provide input into draft laws. Of course, this requires

resources and staff member commitment to organize such visits, but when this can be done, the

committee may hear from a wider range of stakeholders than usual and can see irsthand how a

draft law will impact those closer to the ground. Virtual meetings, enabled by technology, can also

allow for wider remote participation.

Georgia: Agriculture committee engages farmers to improve cooperatives

Having developed a multi-year action plan to improve its capacity (with support from UNDP), the

Agriculture Committee of the Parliament of Georgia started to conduct ield visits and public

hearings outside of Parliament in 2014. By engaging local farmers and those involved in the ag-

riculture industry, the Committee heard many suggestions for how it could address issues and

concerns that were seemingly ignored by the government. At least 200 farmers attended each

hearing held throughout the country. Many farmers raised concerns about cooperatives, a key

form of agricultural development in Georgia. Based on the feedback received, the Committee

initiated and adopted amendments to the Law on Cooperatives, to the beneit of the farmers.

Mid-term Review of the UNDP project Strengthening the System of Parliamentary Democracy in Georgia (January 2016).

In addition, a committee or parliament can be proactive in providing information to public regarding

its work in reviewing draft laws. This can include the publication (e.g., via newspaper or online) of

draft laws, scheduling meetings to review draft laws and calling for submissions from various in-

dividuals and groups.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Does your parliament publish draft laws to encourage public input, for example, by uploading

draft laws on the parliament website or advertising their content in the media?

Do your rules of procedure allow civil society and the public to make submissions on draft

laws, whether in writing or in-person?

How does your parliament advance the inclusion of vulnerable and marginalized groups at

risk of being excluded (based on sex, age, disability status, and membership of a particular

population group) from engaging with parliament and what measures are in place to ensure

their voices are heard by parliament and parliamentarians?

As a matter of good practice, do parliamentarians engage with and consult public on the con-

tent of draft laws before they are considered in parliament?

Does your parliamentary secretariat maintain a list of contacts for civil society organizations,

academics and technical experts who can be asked to provide their views on SDG-related law

reform issues when those issues come up in parliament or its committees?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

B. Facilitating participatory budgeting

Parliament can and should be engaging public in the drawing up of the annual state budget. Even

though the drafting and presentation of the budget is traditionally a purview of the executive branch,

the parliament in some countries does engage the public throughout the budget cycle, including

in pre-budget consultations to hear people’s perspectives prior to receiving the budget from the

Minister of Finance. Such pre-budget consultations can be conducted through a budget or inance

committee that will be the primary or main committee to review the draft budget prior to adoption

by the House. But, it could also include broader consultations from all sectoral committees.

Given new technology, opportunities exist to engage people in “real time” as the budget is debated

in the parliament. To date these tools have primarily been applied to local government budgets (see

box below), but there is no reason such tools cannot be adapted to a national parliament to allow

citizens to provide feedback on various aspects of a budget and how it impacts them.

Ukraine: Citizen budgeting

Since 2014, Open North, along with partners the National Democratic Institute for International

Affairs and Social Boost, has been working with the city of Kiev’s Smart City Ofice to provide

new means of gathering citizen input into the preparation and adoption of the annual city bud-

get. A custom-made internet portal was built that allows residents of Kiev to see drafts of the

annual budget and gives them the opportunity to provide detailed feedback on speciic line

items and budget headings and sub-headings. This input is aggregated and provided to local

elected oficials as they make decisions on budget allocations.

The portal was open for only two months prior to adoption of the annual budget, and was viewed

by over 8,000 individuals, with over 1,000 comments submitted.

Though currently used only by local government, the tool could be adapted for use by parlia-

mentary committees when they consider sectoral budgets. For example, a committee could

upload the draft annual state budget under consideration and seek input from citizens and

relevant civil society organizations prior to the committee’s detailed deliberations and before

making oficial recommendations.

Finally, once the budget has been adopted, the committees responsible for monitoring budget im-

plementation, such as the public accounts or budget and inance committee, should consult the

public, stakeholders and civil society as they seek input into whether and how various budget line

items are expended. Since it is these individuals and groups that will see the impact of any budget

expenditures, they are best situated to inform the committee(s) and parliament if the budget is be-

ing properly implemented.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Does your parliament have a process by which public input is collected prior to the delivery of

the budget in parliament?

Is your parliament equipped, technologically, to use innovative tools to seek public feedback

and ideas as the budget is being debated in parliament?

How does your parliament’s budget oversight committee engage the public as it monitors ex-

penditures?

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

C. Public input into monitoring implementation of laws and policies

As with budgets and lawmaking, a parliament has a key role to play in monitoring implementation

of the laws it passes to ensure the executive branch implements them in accordance with the intent

of the parliament. And as with the other functions of a parliament, a number of tools can be utilized

to engage the public and civil society in this process. As mentioned at the start of this section, public

forums, SMS messaging, partnerships with local organizations, surveys and other tools should be

used to gain insight on the impact or challenges found in a law that has been passed by parliament

and is now being carried out.

In addition to forms of public consultation, individual parliamentarians are engaging people, con-

stituents and voters daily as they seek support and advocacy for their interactions with the gov-

ernment. Helping people with their application for social assistance or a scholarship, for example,

gives a parliamentarian an opportunity to observe challenges that may be arising with the current

laws in place and how their implementation is affecting those that work within a law on a regular

basis. This allows a parliamentarian to see how a law is working de facto.

Jordan: Women members of parliament engage constituents

Women represent only a small percentage of the parliamentarians elected to the Parliament

of Jordan in 2014 with a mandate to allow women Members of Parliament from all parties and

groups to work together to promote issues affecting women and girls. The group received sup-

port to encourage a more robust interaction between the members and voters in Jordan. This

included a series of public forums held throughout the country. Each woman parliamentarian,

supported by others, was assigned one region and conducted a series of public forums in the

region to hear from the citizens in that area. Women were speciically engaged to ensure their

perspective and concerns were collected and used by the Women’s Caucus to promote key is-

sues in parliament.

Source: DFID, Final Evaluation Report of the Westminster Foundation for Democracy Programme, 2015, p. 36.

The parliament, its committees and individual members must build routine feedback loops that

will ensure public feedback and input views are solicited on a regular basis. There are different

means of achieving this goal. For example, some parliamentary committees have developed specif-

ic strategic (or action) plans that identify the key tools and methods of engagement and then work

towards implementing and maintaining such systems.

More established parliaments may have

annual work plans or legislative calendars

that spell out how the parliament and its committees

will use such tools for each draft law reviewed or inquiry conducted. Others have established par-

liamentary information centres that facilitate voter feedback on the work of the parliament.

10 See: Georgia Human Rights and Civil Integration Committee Actions Plan at http://www.parliament.ge/en/saparlamento-saqmia-

noba/komitetebi/adamianis-ulebata-dacvisa-da-samoqalaqo-integraciis-komiteti/komitetis-samoqmedo-gegma.

11 See: British Columbia Legislative Assembly (Canada) at https://www.leg.bc.ca/parliamentary-business/committees-calendar.

12 See: Latvian Parliamentary Information Centre at http://www.saeima.lv/en/public-participation/receiving-visitors-and-arrang-

ing-guided-tours-1/saeima-visitor-and-information-centre.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Members of a parliament will discover what works best in the context of their circumstances. De-

pending on the size of the parliamentarian’s constituency (ranging from small local groups to a na-

tional constituency), the tools used will vary from personal contact and small gatherings to public

opinion polling and online surveys. What is important is for a parliamentarian to create and carry

out a plan that makes constituent consultation routine and impactful, so voters have a concrete

opportunity to provide input into their parliamentarian’s work.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Does your parliament have a process by which public feedback is routinely provided to the

parliament on the implementation of laws?

What methods are used by parliamentarians, individually, to regularly engage people and con-

stituents to hear their concerns and ideas regarding the implementation of laws?

How do your parliament’s committees engage the public as they monitor the implementation

of laws?

•

D. Facilitating participatory Sustainable Development Goal implementation

at the local level

Implementation of the SDGs is not something to be imposed on people by national institutions, but

should be an opportunity to create a local response that relects the context of local communities.

Therefore, the primary objective is to establish a dialogue about the SDGs with local authorities and

people that allows them to express how they want to see the SDGs implemented in their community.

Such a dialogue should be a natural part of the interaction between the government, the parlia-

ment, parliamentarians and public.

Some parliamentarians receive constituency development funds with either complete or partial

discretion as to how they are expended in their constituency. These funds are controversial, be-

cause they give rise to concerns about their oversight, and because they may undermine elected

local government. However, they have proliferated in the past ten years as parliamentarians are

recognized as a source of knowledge regarding where development should occur in their districts.

Whether a member has a constituency development fund or not, there is value in working with

representatives of local government and communities, from all political afiliations, to build a local

development plan. In many cases, the local authority or government will take the lead in prepara-

tion of the plan, but in others the parliament may need to play a more active role in promoting its

production. This will include a series of inclusive and participatory meetings and the identiication

of the needs and wants of people and civil society that will lead to the identiication of key objectives,

a strategy/roadmap and a timeframe for achieving each. This can be done annually or, if spread over

multiple years, should include annual plans for delivery of milestones on the road to the ultimate

objectives.

If the member has a constituency development fund, funding can be allocated to cover all or part of

the plan. If there is no fund, the plan becomes a roadmap for seeking government and other funding

to address the priority needs of the constituency and its communities.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

In countries with functioning local governments (and elected local government organs), the local

development plan is normally formulated under the local government’s leadership. Parliamentari-

ans can nevertheless use their powers and resources (including Constituency Development Funds)

to contribute to local plans. Parliamentarians can also seek to verify that there is coherence be-

tween national and local development plans and the SDGs are fully mainstreamed in both.

Either way, the key role of a parliamentarian is to pass legislation (including the budget law) and

monitor its implementation by way of government service delivery. Development plans need to be

based on engagement with the public and the government, to build buy-in of all parties, both on to

the plan and its long-term goals.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Does your parliament provide Constituency Development Funds to members? If so, is there a

requirement that the funds be spent in accordance with a development plan?

What tools and resources would you require as a parliamentarian to allow you to prepare (or

contribute to) a constituency development plan?

Which communities, groups and individuals should be consulted to produce a constituency

development plan in your district?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

VIII. Parliament’s role in localization of SDGs

MDG implementation experience indicates greater success when implementation was localized via

appropriately-mandated and capacitated sub-national and local governments, and when these lo-

cal institutions were engaged from the early stages of the process.

Under the MDGs, there were experiences in which accountability was not well developed and the

MDGs were ‘hyper-centralized.’ This resulted in a lack of inclusiveness and permitted the contin-

uation of persistent social and regional disparities within a country. A clear link between account-

ability and representation (at national and local levels) can create an important leverage effect that

fosters a fairer distribution of public resources and greater inclusiveness of women, youth and

marginalized and vulnerable groups. Therefore, a mechanism that can foster two-way communi-

cation between the national parliament and local authorities – and one that links with civil society

and people – is important and should be built into the framework of SDG implementation plans for

a country.

Therefore, a parliament should seek to ensure that SDG implementation, from the early formula-

tion of national development plans to the regular monitoring of its implementation, directly involves

provincial and local governments and councils. The parliament should also be satisied that mech-

anisms are in place to receive ongoing input from community-based and civil society organizations

so that their valued perspectives are relected in how the various SDGs are delivered in their areas

and so that local ownership of the process is cultivated.

Below are some ways that a parliament can take speciic action to ensure SDG implementation is

done in coordination with sub-national and local governments and with the input of people through-

out the country.

UNDP Pakistan

Meeting of female community organization “Shamatanzeem” village “Padhana”, and union council “Dheenda” of district Haripur. Discussing general issues.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

•

When considering the national development plan, actively seek and consider inputs from

people and local governments throughout the country.

In legislation that governs local authorities, make it a requirement that local authorities and

governing bodies engage in routine public consultations in their decision-making processes.

Review the annual state budget to verify that it includes adequate funding for local public

engagement activities and civic education on the SDGs.

When national authorities implement programmes at the local level, monitor the process of

programme delivery to ascertain whether the local context is being considered and people

are engaged at the local level.

Provide resources to enable parliamentary committees to hold public hearings and con-

sultations outside of the conines of the parliament, including ield visits and local public

forums. Alternatively, or additionally, invest in technology that allows for virtual, remote

participation in committee business.

•

Questions for reﬂection

•

Do sub-national and local governments in your country play a clear role during the formula-

tion of national development plans?

What methods of dialogue exist between the parliament and provincial and local assemblies to

guarantee a regular and open dialogue on key issues that affect development, and in particu-

lar that relate to the issues addressed under the SDGs?

Does the national development plan ensure that local, speciic contexts will be suficiently re-

lected during implementation? If not, what mechanisms can be added that would guarantee

this?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

IX. Role of parliamentary staff members

By the nature of their job, parliamentarians must be generalists. The variety and complexity of the

issues a member faces on a daily basis–from addressing constituent concerns to reviewing draft

laws–requires them to quickly gain knowledge on disparate topics. No matter their professional

or other experience and expertize, they will face many issues that are beyond their comfort zones.

Thus, parliamentarians rely on parliamentary staff members to deliver support and analysis that is

required to do the detailed work of a legislator.

Almost all parliaments and their members face the challenge of having to engage with an exec-

utive branch that has more resources and expertise than they do. They must work within these

constraints to play a constructive role in adopting and monitoring legislation and budgets, and, of

course, they will face the same constraints in working for SDG implementation. This means that

parliament will need well-capacitated staff members who have access to clear and strong informa-

tion, data and evidence to be able to provide critical and timely advice to individual parliamentarians

and to committees. Without a strong staff member contingent, a parliament will not be able to fulill

its role in the implementation of the Goals.

Speciic ways that staff members help parliamentarians obtain the knowledge, information and

data required to substantively assess any given issue include brieings, hearings, identiication of

stakeholders, research and general support for the preparation of amendments and reports from

committees. Staff members provide support to parliament, its committees and members in the

scrutiny of relevant legislation, the annual state budget and the monitoring of initiatives.

In addition to the general staff of the parliamentary secretariat, below are the three main structures

under which staff members are often organized within a parliament.

•

Committee support staff:

Each committee is assigned a cadre of dedicated professional staff

members, including legal, sector and procedural support staff members to provide direct as-

sistance to the chairperson and members of the committee as they conduct meetings, hear-

ings and deliberations.

•

Dedicated professional units:

In some parliaments, professional staff members are orga-

nized into units based on area of expertise. This may include a Legal Affairs Unit, a Research

Unit, a Procedural Advice Division and a Public Outreach/Communications Unit. These units

would be responsible for providing advice and support to all committees and members, pri-

marily on a demand-driven basis.

•

Specialized units:

There is a growing trend toward establish units within a parliament that

are well-resourced and have a speciic role related to a core function of the institution. The

most common of these is the Parliamentary Budget Ofice, staffed with highly-skilled profes-

sionals, that provides independent analysis to relevant committees regarding adoption and

monitoring of the annual state budget. Some parliaments have also established Parliamen-

tary Institutes, a sort of in-house think tank that provides detailed and scientiic research and

analysis for the parliament.

Notwithstanding the method by which stafing is organized, such staff members should not only

be aware of the SDGs, but how they are being implemented and recognize the key actors for im-

plementation. The SDGs should be “top of mind” as the staff members work on a daily basis in the

sector in which the committee has jurisdiction.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

One consideration is that the resources provided to parliaments to engage professional staff mem-

bers are often limited. As the SDGs cover almost all aspects of development in any given country,

it will be a challenge to upgrade staff member capacity so that they understand, appreciate and

become fully conversant on the SDGs and their objectives. Capacitated and knowledgeable staff and

parliamentarians are essential for SDG implementation. This will likely require that a parliament

conduct an audit or assessment of its stafing to understand whether or not it has the capacity and

resources to meet the needs of SDG fulillment. Such an assessment will enable the leadership of

the institution to identify gaps that call for an investment to ensure that parliament has suficient

capacity to provide the background materials and analysis so that it can effectively be a full actor in

national SDG implementation.

Tanzania: Budget oversight

Tanzania has been a multi-party democracy since 1995. The National Assembly of Tanzania origi-

nally had a Finance Committee that reviewed the annual state budget submitted by the government.

However, the authority of the Finance Committee to make adjustments or to reject speciic sectoral

budgets was limited.

In 2012, with support from UNDP and the local chapter of the African Parliamentarian Network

Against Corruption (a regional branch of GOPAC), the Speaker of the National Assembly identiied

the need for a new budget process. This started with the replacement of the Finance Committee

with a Budget Committee in 2013.

The following year, the National Assembly created and funded a Budget Department with 20 profes-

sional staff members who had speciic skills related to economic and inancial analysis. The man-

date of the department is to support the work of the Budget Committee to review the annual state

budget prior to adoption by the Assembly. It is also to provide analytical papers and research based

on demand from parliamentarians and other committees.

In 2015, as a last part of the reform, the National Assembly adopted the Budget Law. This new law

provided enhanced powers and authority for the Budget Committee to reject portions or the entire

annual state budget.

Going a step further, many parliaments have formulated and adopted multi-year corporate stra-

tegic plans that are based on an assessment of needs and that identify a roadmap for the reforms

and resources required to increase capacity and to fulil its core functions. Such a plan is a good

basis for providing the evidence required to advocate for resource allocations from the annual state

budget and from donors that will support the parliament in its efforts to be capacitated for SDG

implementation.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Does your parliament have professional staff members who are tasked with providing budget

and draft law analysis to the relevant committees as they review SDG-related initiatives?

Has your parliament conducted a needs assessment to determine what support and resources

are required so that staff members have the capacity to provide analysis to committees and

individual parliamentarians?

Has your parliament developed and adopted a strategic development plan to identify where

and how it will increase its capacity to pass legislation and monitor expenditures and enforce-

ment consistently with the SDGs?

•

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

X. Role of parliamentary political party groups

One cannot speak of the work of parliamentarians without acknowledging that the majority of par-

liamentarians are members and representatives of a political party. Working with and through this

party afiliation is an important aspect of parliamentary work and allows for the promotion and

advocacy of party positions and ideas within the parliament.

Debates and discussions are a central facet of parliamentary life. Each party will have its priorities

for policies, legislation and budget allocations to address the needs of their constituents. But while

parties may even differ on how to ultimately achieve the SDGs, no matter the party or the possible

change in government, the country will have to report as to whether or not it achieved the Goals.

Thus, at some point all political parties need to determine how they want to deliver on the Goals and

to present such a plan to the public at each election.

A. Party groups

In almost all parliaments in the world, members who are elected on behalf of a political party sit

as a party group.

These groups meet regularly to agree upon legislative strategies and positions

on draft laws, amendments to draft laws and other major decisions to be taken in parliament.

Parliamentary party groups also play a role in political debate outside of parliament, through their

respective political parties.

If a party group is the majority in parliament (depending on the parliamentary system), it is well

positioned to organize in support of ministers and the executive branch who will be responsible for

ensuring that SDGs are implemented in the country and for reporting internationally on the com-

mitments made. One way of doing this is to establish a SDG Working Group. The primary objective

of the working group would be to work with the various ministers and ministries that will oversee

SDG implementation to ensure the perspectives of party members and constituents are relected

in draft legislation and the budget prior to introduction into the House. Through the working group,

the party has a chance to discuss issues that are likely to be raised by the opposition and minority

party groups and to ine tune their position before the draft law or budget is introduced. It can also

be a venue for discussing potential amendments to such documents once the public has provided

its input through parliamentary procedures, such as public hearings at committee.

For opposition parliamentarians, it is similarly important that the SDGs are integrated into the

work of their party. In some parliamentary systems, there is a Shadow Cabinet–a form of alter-

native government that is composed of parliamentarians from the opposition or minority parties

who serve as party spokespersons or focal points for the line ministries within government. Each

of these shadow ministers should be well-equipped, with knowledge and data, so that the SDGs

are front and centre in their analysis of the work being produced by the ministries that fall under

their jurisdiction. In other types of parliamentary set-ups, the division of labour may be based on

geography or other factors. No matter the means of organization, an opposition should have a clear

understanding of the SDGs and a strong idea of how they think they can best be implemented to

ensure they are best able to monitor the government’s SDG-related actions.

It is also important to note that over the lifespan of SDG implementation (2015-2030), party groups

may very well move from opposition to government (and vice versa). Each party group should be

well informed on the SDGs and committed to their implementation, to ensure that a change in gov-

ernment does not result in unnecessary delays in implementation.

13 In different countries, these groups are known by different names, including parliamentary group, caucus or parliamentary party.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

B. Cross-party groups

Over the past ifteen years, there has been a proliferation of groups of like-minded parliamentar-

ians within a parliament from different party groups. These cross-party groups provide an oppor-

tunity for members with common interests to discuss the promotion of legislation and policies

that relect those interests. These groups allow for the breakdown of party barriers and promote a

dialogue among members that can then be used to forge a consensus that then can be advocated

within the various party groups and in parliament in general.

Some common cross-party groups include women’s caucuses, bilateral parliamentary cooperation

groups and groups afiliated with regional and global networks of parliamentarians (as noted in

Part D of Section III).

Given that the SDGs cover almost all areas of development, it is likely that groups will be established

that will advocate for speciic issues of concern among members. For example, a women’s caucus

will advocate for SDG 5 (gender equality), a GOPAC chapter will advocate for SDG 16 (accountability)

and a Climate Parliament chapter will advocate for SDG 7 (clean energy).

But there is also room for general cross-party work on the SDGs. Some parliaments established

working groups under the MDGs (and a few have already done so for the SDGs). Such a group can

become a venue for education, promotion and advocacy for the SDGs in general. It can also be a key

group in the promotion of the institutionalization of the systems required (and noted throughout this

handbook) for a parliament to be an active and key participant in implementing the Goals.

Pakistan: Sustainable Development Goals working group

With the adoption of the SDGs in September 2015, the Pakistan National Assembly established a

cross-party working group of parliamentarians from all major party groups. The objective of the

working group is two-fold: (i) to provide information about the SDGs and the role of the parliament

in their implementation; and (ii) to create a venue through which parliamentarians, their parties and

the parliament can coordinate its work in SDG implementation.

See: “National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq Inaugurates SDG Secretariat,” 16 February 2016, http://www.na.gov.pk/en/pressre-

lease.php?content=101.

An all-party group can also be a venue for political consensus and advocacy within the various

political parties represented in the parliament. The group should ensure that not only the parlia-

mentarians that are members of the group are informed and engaged on the SDGs, but that they

liaise with their respective parties to share SDG-related knowledge so that those parties are also

informed and engaged with the Goals.

Questions for reﬂection

•

Have the party groups within your parliament organized their work in a manner that generally

promotes the SDGs, and are speciic goals considered during the organization of their work?

Does your parliament have an SDG working group? If so, what is its mandate? If not, what

mandate would you foresee for such a group?

What cross-party groups could be established in your parliament to promote speciic SDGs? Do

these align with the development priorities of your government’s national development planning?

What mechanisms does your party have to learn more about the SDGs via their parliamentarians?

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

XI.

Building the capacity of parliamentarians and

staff members on Sustainable Development Goals

Implementing the SDGs will be a generational challenge. As a parliamentarian, you may or may

not still hold ofice in 2030 when there will be assessment of whether or not your country has fully

or partially achieved the Goals. But, you should be thinking about your role, and that of the entire

parliament, in putting in place the systems and practices that will give your country the greatest

chance of success. For this is not just about measuring abstract data and numbers, but, in the

end, an opportunity to use the SDGs to develop your country and to remove the barriers that have

prevented people and countries from liberating themselves from poverty and achieving sustainable

development.

To get from here to there, as mentioned earlier, all parliaments will need to build new capacities.

Even if your parliament is actively engaging public and seeking their feedback through the work of

members and committees; even if your parliament has the capacity to conduct in-depth research

and has in place systems that allow people’s voices to be actively expressed through parliamentar-

ians; there will still be a need to relect on how your systems must be retooled to ensure they will

advance the 17 SDGs.

UNDP Moldova

Parliament Secretariat pledges to promote a gender-responsive human resources management on 23rd November 2016.

Most parliaments do not meet the standards required for full SDG attainment. All parliaments will

need to further educate parliamentarians and staff members on the SDGs and how to integrate the

Goals into their everyday work. This document should be a starting point for a discussion on how

your parliament engages in implementation of the Agenda 2030 and its SDGs in your country. The

questions at the end of each section have been meant as an opportunity to self-examine the work

currently being done in your House and what you may be able to do to make the institution more

effective.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

Some parliaments have understood the importance of the SDGs (and their predecessor, the MDGs)

for some time. They have already developed knowledge products and guides that parliamentarians

can use to help them consider the Goals as they go about their constant interaction with public and

the government.

Indonesia: Parliamentarians guide to the Millennium Development Goals

In 2003, the Indonesia House of Representatives established a Parliamentary Task Force on the

MDGs. This Task Force produced a guide for parliamentarians on the MDGs. The guide offered a

series of key questions related to the MDGs for consideration by all parliamentarians as they drafted

laws and monitored government activities. The Guide included a template for citizen engagement

and stressed what parliamentarians, both at national and sub-national levels, should observe and

bear in mind as they conducted ield visits and engaged with communities.

Some parliaments may recognize there are limits to what they can do themselves, due to shortages

of staff members or of members of parliament themselves, for instance. To overcome limitations,

at times, parliaments establish projects and programmes with organizations, such as UNDP, to

assist them with capacity building, preparation of legal frameworks and the creation of tools and

mechanisms to foster the achievement of the SDGs. Tools to do this might include workshops, sem-

inars, attachments and peer-to-peer coaching for staff members and parliamentarians.

When integrated with the long-term planning noted elsewhere in this document, such day-to-day

and special project support can have a signiicant impact on a parliament’s capacity, as it continues

to work towards being a full and active partner in SDG implementation.

Samoa: Induction for new parliamentarians on the Sustainable Development Goals

Following the March 2016 general election in Samoa, various United Nations agencies, including the

International Labour Organization and UNDP, in cooperation with the Ofice of the Clerk and Leg-

islative Assembly and government ministries, organized an induction programme on the SDGs for

newly-elected parliamentarians. The programme was part of a broader orientation for new mem-

bers. It gave the parliamentarians an opportunity to better understand their role in SDG implemen-

tation and what type of support they can receive from the United Nations and other organizations as

they move forward.

Source: www.samoaobserver.ws/en/18_03_2016/local/3791/Making-global-goals-Samoaâ€™s-own.htm.

Parliaments that want to be active in SDG implementation in their country should build a case for

requesting support from international and regional organizations that provide funding, technical

advice and other resources to support parliament capacity building and engagement in the delivery

of the various Goals.

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

In addition to the supportive organizations already noted, a parliament can seek funding from in-

ternational inancial institutions, such as the Islamic Development Bank

and other regional devel-

opment banks. These institutions were established to, among other things, build state institutions

to guarantee that member countries meet their long-term development objectives, including the

SDGs.

The key for a parliament that is willing to engage on the SDGs is to build on the content of this hand-

book. Based on the information laid out in this document, the examples provided from different

countries and the answers to the relective questions, a parliament can produce an evidence-based

feasibility study or needs assessment that can be the basis of a request for support and resources

to deliver the changes required to have a parliament as an active partner in the achievement of the

SDGs.

Questions for reﬂection

•

What plan does your parliament have for building the capacity of its staff members and parlia-

mentarians?

What plans does your parliament have for creating and disseminating SDG knowledge prod-

ucts speciic to your country?

Is an adequate internal budget available for staff member and parliamentarian training and

knowledge product development?

What support is available from external organizations to help build the capacity of staff mem-

bers and parliamentarians in your parliament?

Which international inancial institutions are prepared to make resources to help with parlia-

mentary capacity building and training?

14 World Bank - International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) - European Investment Bank (EIB) - Asian Development Bank

(ADB) - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) - CAF - Development Bank of Latin America (CAF) - Inter-Amer-

ican Development Bank Group (IDB, IADB) - African Development Bank (AfDB) - Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) - Carib-

bean Development Bank (CDB) - Central American Bank for Economic Integration (CABEI) - East African Development Bank (EADB)

- West African Development Bank (BOAD) - Black Sea Trade and Development Bank (BSTDB) - Economic Cooperation Organization

Trade and Development Bank (ETDB) - Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) - New Development Bank (NDB) (formerly BRICS Develop-

ment Bank)

URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling URU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 225: Ny UNDP håndbog: Parlamenters rolle i implementering af verdensmålene for bæredygtig udvikling

United Nation Development Programme

One United Nations Plaza

New York, NY, 10017 USA

Tel: +1 212 906 5502

For more information: www.undp.org