Sundheds- og Ældreudvalget 2016-17
SUU Alm.del Bilag 314
Offentligt
1757642_0001.png
Research
JAMA Psychiatry |
Original Investigation
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental,
Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
A Longitudinal and Nationwide Register-Based Study
Annette Erlangsen, PhD; Bo Runeson, MD, PhD; James M. Bolton, MD; Holly C. Wilcox, PhD; Julie L Forman, PhD;
Jesper Krogh, DMSc; M. Katherine Shear, MD; Merete Nordentoft, DMSc; Yeates Conwell, MD
Editorial
IMPORTANCE
Bereavement after spousal suicide has been linked to mental disorders;
Supplemental content
however, a comprehensive assessment of the effect of spousal suicide is needed.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether bereavement after spousal suicide was linked to an
excessive risk of mental, physical, and social health outcomes when compared with the
general population and spouses bereaved by other manners.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This nationwide, register-based cohort study conducted
in Denmark of 6.7 million individuals aged 18 years and older from 1980 to 2014 covered
more than 136 million person-years and compared people bereaved by spousal suicide with
the general population and people bereaved by other manners of death. Incidence rate ratios
were calculated using Poisson regressions while adjusting for sociodemographic
characteristics and the presence of mental and physical disorders.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Mental disorders (any disorder, mood, posttraumatic stress
disorder, anxiety, alcohol use disorders, drug use disorders, and self-harm); physical disorders
(cancers, diabetes, sleep disorder, cardiovascular diseases, chronic lower respiratory tract
diseases, liver cirrhosis, and spinal disc herniation); causes of mortality (all-cause, natural,
unintentional, suicide, and homicide); social health outcomes; and health care use.
RESULTS
The total study population included 3 491 939 men, 4814 of whom were bereaved
by spousal suicide, and 3 514 959 women, 10 793 of whom were bereaved by spousal suicide.
Spouses bereaved by a partner’s suicide had higher risks of developing mental disorders
within 5 years of the loss (men: incidence rate ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.0; women: incidence
rate ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6-1.8) than the general population. Elevated risks for developing
physical disorders, such as cirrhosis and sleep disorders, were also noted as well as the use
of more municipal support, sick leave benefits, and disability pension funds than the general
population. Compared with spouses bereaved by other manners of death, those bereaved by
suicide had higher risks for developing mental disorders (men: incidence rate ratio, 1.7; 95%
CI, 1.5-1.9; women: incidence rate ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.9-2.2), suicidal behaviors, mortality,
and municipal support. Additionally, a higher level of mental health care use was noted.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Exposure to suicide is stressful and affects the bereaved
spouse on a broad range of outcomes. The excess risks of mental, physical, and social health
outcomes highlight a need for more support directed toward spouses bereaved by suicide.
Author Affiliations:
Author
affiliations are listed at the end of this
article.
Corresponding Author:
Annette
Erlangsen, PhD, Research Unit,
Mental Health Centre Copenhagen,
Kildegaardsvej 28, DK-2900
Hellerup, Denmark (annette
[email protected]).
JAMA Psychiatry.
doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0226
Published online March 22, 2017.
(Reprinted)
E1
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017
SUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 314: Henvendelse af 16/5-17 fra Dansk Forskningsinstitut for Selvmordsforebyggelse vedr. hjælp til efterladte efter selvmord
1757642_0002.png
Research
Original Investigation
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental, Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
ach year, more than 800 000 people die by suicide,
1
each person leaving behind up to 60 relatives and
friends directly affected.
2
The emotional response to
suicide loss may include shock, denial, anger, guilt, shame, or
relief, and complicated grief might arise.
3,4
Support pro-
grams exist but are not broadly available and, to our knowl-
edge, many have not been evaluated.
5,6
Stress has been defined as situations in which “environ-
mental demands tax or exceed the adaptive capacity of an or-
ganism, resulting in psychological and biological changes that
may place persons at risk for disease.”
7
Psychological stress-
ors, such as bereavement by suicide, might lead to mental dis-
orders such as depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress dis-
order (PTSD), and psychosis as well as self-harm and death by
suicide.
8-13
Assortative mating might further exacerbate the ef-
fect of a suicide loss.
12
Through various mechanisms, psycho-
logical stress has been linked to physical disorders,
7,14,15
such
as cardiovascular diseases, cancers, infections, type 2 diabe-
tes, sleep disorders, and disorders related to alcohol misuse,
such as liver cirrohsis.
14,16-19
Furthermore, increased health care
use and higher risks of mortality have been observed.
12,20
Stud-
ies have linked mental health outcomes to spousal suicide and
evidence of an effect on physical and social health outcomes
is lacking.
12,21-23
Also, those bereaved by other causes of sud-
den death experience mental disorders.
24
To our knowledge,
however, whether any aspects of loss by suicide are worse than
bereavement in general remains unexamined.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether spou-
sal suicide is linked to adverse mental, physical, and social
health outcomes when compared with the general popula-
tion and people bereaved by other manners of death.
E
Key Points
Question
Does the suicide of a spouse affect the health of the
surviving partner?
Findings
In this nationwide register-based cohort study, an
increased risk of mental and physical disorders, mortality, and
adverse social events were noted among people bereaved by
spousal suicide. Bereavement by suicide differed from
bereavement by other manners of death.
Meaning
Surviving partners are affected on a broad range of
mental, physical, and social health outcomes, suggesting a need
for more proactive outreach.
regardless of civil status, who were not bereaved by suicide
but could be bereaved by other manners of death (group A)
and (2) people bereaved by spousal death because of any
other manner who were identified in similar manners as
described earlier (group B).
Outcomes
The examined outcomes included mental disorders (any dis-
order, mood, PTSD, anxiety, alcohol use disorders, drug use
disorders, and self-harm); physical disorders (cancers, diabe-
tes, sleep disorders, cardiovascular diseases, chronic lower re-
spiratory tract diseases, liver cirrhosis, and spinal disc hernia-
tion); causes of mortality (all causes, natural, unintentional,
suicide, and homicide); social health outcomes (divorce, chil-
dren placed outside the home, a need for municipal family sup-
port, sick leave, unemployment, and disability pension); and
health care utilization. Detailed specifications of the exam-
ined outcomes are listed in eTable 1 in the
Supplement.
Diagnoses from the Psychiatric Central Research Register
and the National Hospital Registry were used as markers of
mental and physical disorders. Additionally, data from the
Prescription Registry were assessed to identify people with
prescriptions for antidepressants. Causes of death were iden-
tified in the Cause of Death register. The examined social out-
comes were based on data from municipal records and in-
come registers. Finally, data on health care use were derived
from hospital and Health Service registers.
Methods
A cohort study design was applied to individual-level data on
all people aged 18 years or older living in Denmark during 1980
to 2014 (n = 7 006 898). Data from the following registries were
linked using a unique, personal identifier: the Civil Registra-
tion System,
25
the Cause of Death Registry,
26
the Psychiatric
Central Research Register,
27
the National Hospital Registry,
28
and the Registry of Social Pension and Income.
29
The unique
identifier is assigned at birth or first entry into the country.
30
The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency
and informed consent was waived.
Follow-up
All persons aged 18 years or older on January 1, 1980, were fol-
lowed up until December 31, 2014. People who later migrated
into the country or had their 18th birthday after January 1, 1980,
entered the study population on the date of the respective
event. People were considered unexposed until the date of their
spouse’s suicide. Similarly, those bereaved because of other
manners of death were included in group B at the date of spou-
sal death. The follow-up period ended at date of the outcome
of interest, emigration, death, or the end of the study.
Exposed
People who died by suicide since 1970 were identified in the
Cause of Death Registry using the
International Classification
of Diseases, Eighth
and
Tenth Revision (ICD-8
and
ICD-10).
31,32
Data were linked to surviving spouses, defined as those mar-
ried, cohabiting, or living in a registered partnership as of Janu-
ary 1 of the calendar year when the death took place, to iden-
tify those bereaved by suicide.
33
Statistical Analyses
We used a Poisson regression analysis to compare the inci-
dence rates among the exposed relatives with those of groups
A and B. Results were expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRRs)
with 95% confidence intervals.
jamapsychiatry.com
Unexposed
Two comparison groups were formed: (1) the general popu-
lation consisting of all people in the study population,
E2
JAMA Psychiatry
Published online March 22, 2017
(Reprinted)
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017
SUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 314: Henvendelse af 16/5-17 fra Dansk Forskningsinstitut for Selvmordsforebyggelse vedr. hjælp til efterladte efter selvmord
1757642_0003.png
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental, Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
Original Investigation
Research
Only the first onset of any outcome was considered. Long-
term models assessed the effect of spousal suicide from the
date of bereavement until the end of observation while mod-
els with a 5-year follow-up measured more immediate ef-
fects. Multivariate regression models were adjusted for calen-
dar period, country of birth, age, civil status, household income
level, presence of chronic physical disorders,
34
mental disor-
ders, and self-harm. Time-varying covariates were used while
the presence of mental disorders and self-harm were mea-
sured at baseline. The unit of measurement was person-days
expressed as person-years.
The distribution in risk over time was assessed by calcu-
lating Kaplan-Meier survival curves for a subset of outcomes.
The statistical analyses were carried out using SAS ver-
sion 9.4 (SAS Global).
35
After a spouse’s suicide, people who later remarried
were less likely to get a divorce than members of the general
population after adjusting for civil status. People bereaved
by suicide were more likely to require municipal-directed
family support and have a child placed outside the home by
authorities. Additionally, extended periods of sick leave
from work, unemployment, and the use of disability pen-
sions were observed.
People bereaved by a spouse’s suicide were more likely to
be admitted to psychiatric hospitals and attend therapy ses-
sions with privately practicing psychologists or psychiatrists.
Women bereaved by suicide were less likely to be hospital-
ized for somatic disorders and see general practitioners.
Comparison With People Bereaved by Other Manners
of Death (Group B)
When comparing spouses bereaved by a partner’s suicide with
spouses bereaved by other outcomes in
Figure 1
and
2,
a higher
risk of mental disorders was observed (men: IRR, 1.7; 95% CI,
1.5-1.9; women: IRR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.8-2.2). There was an ex-
cess risk for the following disorders after bereavement by a
spouse’s suicide: mood disorders (men: IRR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-
2.1; women: IRR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5), PTSD (men: IRR, 5.6; 95%
CI, 2.7-11.4; women: IRR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.3-5.5), anxiety (men:
IRR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9; women: IRR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3), drug
use disorders (men: IRR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; women: IRR, 1.0;
95% CI, 0.8-1.3), and deliberate self-harm (men: IRR, 1.3; 95%
CI, 1.0-1.8; women: IRR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8).
Spousal suicide was linked to a lower risk of spouses re-
ceiving a subsequent diagnosis of cancers (men: IRR, 0.8; 95%
CI, 0.7-0.9; women: IRR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9), diabetes (men:
IRR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7; women: IRR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.8),
cardiovascular (men: IRR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9; women: IRR,
0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0), and chronic lower respiratory tract dis-
orders (men: IRR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-1.0; women: IRR, 0.7; 95%
CI, 0.6-0.8). Those recently bereaved by a spouse’s suicide had
elevated risks of dying by any cause (men: IRR, 1.2; 95% CI,
1.1-1.3; women: IRR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5), but the risk was ac-
centuated for suicide (men: IRR, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.8-4.3; wom-
en: IRR, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.3-5.2) and women faced an increased
risk of dying by homicide (IRR, 33.8; 95% CI, 22.0 to 51.8).
While women bereaved by suicide were less likely to get
a divorce after remarrying than those bereaved by other dis-
orders (IRR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9), they were somewhat more
likely to require municipal intervention (IRR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-
1.5). People bereaved by suicide were less likely to take sick
leave (men: IRR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9; women: IRR, 0.8; 95%
CI, 0.7-0.8) or experience unemployment (men: IRR, 0.9; 95%
CI, 0.8-1.0; women: IRR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9).
An increased use of psychiatric in patient care was noted
among people bereaved by a spouse’s suicide (men: IRR, 1.5;
95% CI, 1.1-2.0; women: IRR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-1.9) as well as 1
or more appointments with private psychiatrists or psycholo-
gists (men: IRR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.5; women: IRR, 1.7; 95% CI,
1.5-1.9). Somatic hospital use was less for women (IRR, 0.9; 95%
CI, 0.8 to 1.0), while men were less likely to see a general prac-
titioner than those bereaved by other manners of death (IRR,
0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0).
(Reprinted)
JAMA Psychiatry
Published online March 22, 2017
E3
Results
The total study population consisted of 3 491 939 men and
3 514 959 women who were observed over 79 050 358 and
81 033 322 person-years, respectively. In all, 4814 men (mean
age [SD], 54.0 [14.2]) and 10 793 women (mean age [SD], 49.6
[15.2]) bereaved by a spouse’s suicide were followed up over
75 683 and 184 863 person-years.
The general population, group A, was followed up over
79 126 041 person-years for men and 81 218 1853 for women.
Group B, people bereaved by spousal deaths other than suicide,
covered 251 863 men (mean age [SD], 70.1 [12.8]) and 536 915
women (mean age [SD], 67.9 years [12.1]) observed over 2 285 907
and 6 396 101 person-years, respectively. Characteristics for the
participants are detailed in eTable 2 in the
Supplement.
Comparison With the General Population (Group A)
Multivariate regressions showed that people bereaved by spou-
sal suicide had an elevated risk of a mental disorder (IRR: men,
1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.0; IRR: women, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.6-1.8) when
compared with the general population (Table
1
and
2).
Excess
risks were noted for mood disorders, PTSD, anxiety disor-
ders, alcohol use disorders, drug use disorders, receiving pre-
scriptions for antidepressants, and self-harm.
Those bereaved by spousal suicide had an increased risk
of cancer, cirrhosis, and spinal disc herniation. Over the 5-year
follow-up, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic lower
respiratory tract diseases were observed significantly less fre-
quently among those bereaved by suicide. Over the long-
term follow-up, increased risks of sleep disorders were noted
as well as an increased risk of chronic lower respiratory tract
diseases among women.
Among those bereaved by a partner’s suicide, men had
higher risks of dying by any cause (men: IRR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-
1.4; women: IRR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.3) and men had higher risks
of dying by natural causes (men: IRR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2; wom-
en: IRR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.9-1.1) than the general population. A 6-
to 8-fold (men: IRR, 6.4; 95% CI, 5.3-7.8; women: IRR, 8.5; 95%
CI, 7.0-10.5) higher risk of suicide was also noted in the first 5
years as well as a higher risk of death by homicide for women,
while few events were observed for men.
jamapsychiatry.com
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017
SUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 314: Henvendelse af 16/5-17 fra Dansk Forskningsinstitut for Selvmordsforebyggelse vedr. hjælp til efterladte efter selvmord
1757642_0004.png
Research
Original Investigation
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental, Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
Table 1. Men Bereaved by Suicide Compared With the General Population (Group A) in Denmark Aged 18 Years and Over During 1980 to 2014
5-y Follow-up
Spouses Bereaved
by Suicide
Outcome
Mental disorders
b
Any mental disorder
Mood disorders
PTSD
Anxiety disorders
Alcohol use disorder
Drug use disorder
Prescribed antidepressants
Deliberate self-harm
Physical disorders
Cancer
c
Diabetes
c
Long-term
Follow-up
General Population
No.
324 524
109 563
9569
43 623
175 325
65 501
593 486
52 507
419 249
194 828
54 427
1 076 658
245 790
44 142
170 396
996 735
930 886
42 083
22 910
1883
407 837
88 654
84 250
990 053
1 177 152
19 533
640 224
56 159
2 045 002
58 581
b
IRR (95% CI)
Unadjusted
2.7 (2.3-3.0)
3.2 (2.6-3.8)
3.5 (1.9-6.5)
2.7 (2.0-3.8)
2.0 (1.6-2.4)
1.4 (1.0-2.0)
1.5 (1.3-1.7)
2.9 (2.1-3.9)
1.6 (1.4-1.9)
1.0 (0.8-1.3)
0.7 (0.4-1.3)
1.6 (1.4-1.7)
1.6 (1.3-1.9)
2.1 (1.5-3.1)
1.2 (1.0-1.6)
2.3 (2.1-2.5)
2.0 (1.8-2.2)
1.9 (1.3-2.9)
15.1 (12.4-18.3)
NA
0.3 (0.2-0.4)
3.3 (2.7-4.1)
2.0 (1.5-2.7)
1.4 (1.3-1.6)
1.0 (0.9-1.1)
2.8 (1.7-4.5)
1.9 (1.8-2.2)
2.9 (2.2-3.8)
1.0 (1.0-1.1)
4.1 (3.2-5.2)
Adjusted
a
1.8 (1.6-2.0)
2.2 (1.8-2.7)
12.1 (6.4-22.7)
2.5 (1.8-3.4)
1.5 (1.2-1.8)
1.7 (1.2-2.5)
1.3 (1.2-1.5)
2.0 (1.5-2.7)
1.2 (1.0-1.4)
0.8 (0.6-1.1)
1.4 (0.8-2.5)
1.0 (0.9-1.1)
1.0 (0.8-1.2)
1.6 (1.1-2.3)
1.5 (1.2-1.9)
1.3 (1.2-1.4)
1.1 (1.0-1.2)
0.7 (0.5-1.1)
6.4 (5.3-7.8)
NA
0.2 (0.2-0.3)
3.6 (2.9-4.5)
3.7 (2.8-5.0)
2.3 (2.1-2.5)
2.1 (1.9-2.3)
2.9 (1.8-4.8)
1.2 (1.0-1.3)
2.7 (2.1-3.7)
1.1 (1.0-1.1)
5.8 (4.6-7.4)
Adjusted
a
1.2 (1.1-1.3)
1.2 (1.1-1.4)
2.6 (1.5-4.6)
1.4 (1.1-1.8)
1.4 (1.3-1.6)
1.5 (1.2-1.8)
1.0 (1.0-1.1)
1.6 (1.3-2.0)
1.2 (1.2-1.3)
1.0 (1.0-1.2)
1.4 (1.1-1.7)
1.0 (1.0-1.1)
1.1 (1.0-1.1)
1.5 (1.2-1.8)
1.3 (1.1-1.5)
1.1 (1.0-1.1)
1.1 (1.0-1.1)
0.7 (0.5-0.8)
3.6 (3.1-4.3)
NA
0.6 (0.6-0.7)
2.5 (2.1-2.9)
1.8 (1.5-2.2)
1.5 (1.4-1.6)
1.7 (1.6-1.8)
1.8 (1.3-2.6)
1.0 (1.0-1.1)
2.0 (1.6-2.5)
1.1 (1.1-1.1)
2.4 (2.0-2.8)
No.
243
101
10
35
100
27
257
44
199
59
12
467
113
28
62
687
557
24
103
3
35
84
50
411
357
16
362
47
730
71
IR per
100 000 PY
1163
444
43
151
448
116
1174
192
878
257
51
2468
496
120
276
2915
2363
102
437
13
165
379
217
2202
1990
68
1711
207
4407
306
IR per
100 000 PY
437
140
12
56
229
83
798
67
543
252
69
1569
320
56
222
1260
1177
53
29
2
559
115
108
1556
2061
25
881
72
4211
75
Sleep disorder
Cardiovascular diseases
Chronic lower respiratory tract
diseases
c
Liver cirrhosis
c
Spinal disc herniation
Mortality
Any death
Natural death
Unintentional
Suicide
Homicide
Social and work-related events
Divorce
Children placed outside home
Municipal family support
Sick leave
Unemployed
Disability pension
Service usage
Somatic hospitalization
Psychiatric hospitalization
GP contact
Psychological/psychiatric
therapy
Abbreviations: GP, general practitioner; IR, incidence rate; IRR, incidence rate
ratio; NA, not applicable; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; PY, person-years.
a
Multivariate models were adjusted for calendar period, country of birth, age
groups, civil status, household income level, presence of chronic physical
disorders (measured using the Charlson Index), previous psychiatric
hospitalization, and previous records of self-harm.
As a person could have been diagnosed with more than 1 mental disorder, the
total number of people with any mental disorders is smaller than the sum of
people with specific disorders.
The examined physical disorder is included in the Charlson Index, so an
adaptation of the Charlson Index without the specific physical disorder was
used for the multivariate model.
c
The Kaplan-Meier plots revealed several group differences
between the examined groups (eFigure in the
Supplement).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the largest and most comprehensive
study of spouses bereaved by a partner’s suicide. Using nation-
E4
JAMA Psychiatry
Published online March 22, 2017
(Reprinted)
wide data, exposure to spousal suicide was linked to higher risks
for developing mental disorders, suicidal behavior, specific
physical disorders, any cause of mortality, suicide, dying by ho-
micide, adverse social events, and mental health care use when
compared with the general population. Those bereaved by a
spouse’s suicide were more affected by mental disorders, mor-
tality, select social outcomes, and mental health care use than
those bereaved by other manners of death.
jamapsychiatry.com
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017
SUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 314: Henvendelse af 16/5-17 fra Dansk Forskningsinstitut for Selvmordsforebyggelse vedr. hjælp til efterladte efter selvmord
1757642_0005.png
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental, Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
Original Investigation
Research
Table 2. Women Bereaved by Suicide Compared With the General Population (Group A) in Denmark Aged 18 Years and Over During 1980 to 2014
a
5-y Follow-up
Spouses Bereaved
by Suicide
No.
Mental disorders
b
Any psychiatric diagnosis
Mood disorders
PTSD
Anxiety disorders
Alcohol use disorder
Drug use disorder
Prescribed antidepressants
Deliberate self-harm
Physical disorders
Cancer
c
Diabetes
c
Long-term
Follow-up
General Population
No.
386 846
184 072
9678
87 962
81 809
57 724
876 917
62 753
IR per
100 000 PY
512
233
12
110
102
72
1197
79
IRR (95% CI)
Unadjusted
2.4 (2.2-2.6)
1.9 (1.7-2.2)
4.5 (3.1-6.5)
1.6 (1.3-2.0)
2.6 (2.2-3.1)
1.6 (1.3-2.1)
1.4 (1.3-1.5)
2.8 (2.3-3.3)
Adjusted
a
1.7 (1.6-1.8)
1.5 (1.3-1.7)
8.7 (6.0-12.5)
1.4 (1.1-1.7)
2.3 (1.9-2.7)
1.6 (1.2-2.1)
1.3 (1.2-1.3)
2.1 (1.8-2.6)
Adjusted
a
1.1 (1.0-1.1)
1.1 (1.0-1.1)
2.6 (1.9-3.6)
1.1 (1.0-1.2)
2.0 (1.8-2.2)
1.6 (1.4-1.8)
1.1 (1.0-1.1)
1.6 (1.4-1.8)
IR per
100 000 PY
1235
445
54
180
266
116
1665
218
587
231
29
95
140
62
803
114
334
89
12
749
172
37
151
643
167
22
1632
326
69
288
445 274
166 151
21 821
1 116 171
253 059
26 043
176 892
570
209
27
1595
321
32
224
1.1 (1.0-1.3)
0.8 (0.6-1.0)
0.8 (0.5-1.4)
1.0 (1.0-1.1)
1.0 (0.9-1.2)
2.1 (1.5-2.9)
1.3 (1.1-1.5)
1.2 (1.0-1.3)
0.7 (0.6-0.9)
1.4 (0.7-2.8)
0.9 (0.8-1.0)
0.9 (0.7-1.0)
2.1 (1.5-2.9)
1.5 (1.3-1.8)
1.2 (1.2-1.3)
1.0 (0.9-1.1)
1.4 (1.0-1.8)
1.0 (1.0-1.1)
1.2 (1.1-1.2)
2.0 (1.6-2.3)
1.4 (1.3-1.5)
Sleep disorder
Cardiovascular diseases
Chronic lower respiratory tract
diseases
c
Liver cirrhosis
c
Spinal disc herniation
Mortality
Any death
Natural death
Unintentional
Suicide
Homicide
Social and work-related events
Divorce
Children placed outside home
Municipal family support
Sick leave
Unemployed
Disability pension
Service usage
Somatic hospitalization
Psychiatric hospitalization
GP contact
Psychological/psychiatric
therapy
796
596
27
95
78
1465
1097
50
175
144
988 209
935 957
40 047
11 085
1126
1218
1153
49
14
1
1.2 (1.1-1.3)
1.0 (0.9-1.0)
1.0 (0.7-1.5)
12.8 (10.5-15.7)
103.5 (82.2-130.1)
1.3 (1.2-1.3)
1.0 (0.9-1.1)
0.9 (0.6-1.3)
8.5 (7.0-10.5)
62.7 (48.5-81.2)
1.1 (1.0-1.1)
1.0 (1.0-1.1)
0.9 (0.8-1.1)
4.5 (3.7-5.4)
30.6 (23.8-39.3)
64
208
198
1184
1019
48
129
409
376
2891
2911
89
420 088
89 175
85 888
1 017 316
1 242 117
24 316
564
113
107
1533
2220
30
0.2 (0.2-0.3)
3.6 (3.2-4.1)
3.5 (3.0-4.0)
1.9 (1.8-2.0)
1.3 (1.2-1.4)
3.0 (2.2-3.9)
0.2 (0.1-0.2)
4.8 (4.2-5.5)
5.7 (4.9-6.5)
3.5 (3.3-3.7)
2.3 (2.1-2.4)
3.3 (2.5-4.4)
0.5 (0.5-0.6)
3.7 (3.3-4.1)
2.9 (2.6-3.2)
2.2 (2.1-2.3)
1.9 (1.8-2.0)
2.8 (2.3-3.3)
632
136
1,663
310
1332
260
15 327
587
854 221
61 313
2 105 681
107 043
1200
77
13 220
134
b
1.1 (1.0-1.2)
3.4 (2.9-4.0)
1.2 (1.1-1.2)
4.4 (3.9-4.9)
0.7 (0.7-0.8)
3.2 (2.8-3.9)
0.9 (0.9-1.0)
5.3 (4.7-5.9)
0.8 (0.8-0.9)
2.2 (2.0-2.5)
1.0 (1.0-1.0)
2.1 (2.0-2.3)
Abbreviations: IR, Incidence rate; IRR, incidence rate ratio; PTSD, posttraumatic
stress disorder; PY, person-years.
a
Multivariate models were adjusted for calendar period, country of birth, age
groups, civil status, household income level, presence of chronic physical
disorders (measured using the Charlson Index), previous psychiatric
hospitalization, and previous records of self-harm.
As a person could have been diagnosed with more than 1 mental disorder, the
total number of people with any mental disorders is smaller than the sum of
people with specific disorders.
The examined physical disorder is included in the Charlson Index, so an
adaptation of the Charlson Index without the specific physical disorder was
used for the multivariate model.
c
Mental Health
Spouses bereaved by suicide had higher risks for all exam-
ined mental disorders, including deliberate self-harm, when
compared with the general population. While previous stud-
ies have linked spousal suicide to depression and death by
suicide,
12,22
the current study extends our knowledge of which
mental disorders might arise after the suicide of a spouse.
jamapsychiatry.com
Excess risks of mood disorders and PTSD were found
when comparing spouses bereaved by suicide with those
bereaved by other manners. Previous studies of similar
groups are limited to measuring depression.
22,24
No differ-
ences were noted for alcohol and drug use disorders, which
suggests that these may be pervasive across all types of
bereavement.
36
(Reprinted)
JAMA Psychiatry
Published online March 22, 2017
E5
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017
SUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 314: Henvendelse af 16/5-17 fra Dansk Forskningsinstitut for Selvmordsforebyggelse vedr. hjælp til efterladte efter selvmord
1757642_0006.png
Research
Original Investigation
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental, Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
Figure 1. Men Bereaved by Suicide Compared With Men Bereaved by Other Manners of Death
Over a 5-Year Follow-up (Group B)
Any mental disorder
Mood disorders
Posttraumatic stress disorder
Anxiety disorders
Alcohol use disorder
Drug use disorder
Prescribed antidepressants
Deliberate self-harm
Cancer
Diabetes
Sleep disorder
Cardiovascular diseases
Chronic lower respiratory tract diseases
Liver cirrhosis
Spinal disc herniation
Any death
Natural death
Unintentional
Suicide
Homicide
Divorce
Children placed outside home
Municipal family support
Sick leave
Unemployed
Disability pension
Somatic hospitalization
Psychiatric hospitalization
General practitioner contact
Psych/psychiatric consultation
0
1
2
3
4
Rate Ratio
5
6
7
8
Multivariate models were adjusted
for the calendar period, country of
birth, age group, civil status,
household income level, presence of
physical disorder (measured using
the Charlson Index), previous
psychiatric hospitalization, and
previous records of self-harm.
Physical Health
Spousal suicide has, to our knowledge, not previously been
linked to physical disorders. The excess risks of cancer and cir-
rhosis, as well as sleep disorders and chronic lower respira-
tory tract diseases (long-term), might be attributed to un-
healthy coping styles, such as alcohol use disorder, or a
weakening of the immune system, both related to psychoso-
cial stress.
14,37
A spouse’s death by any cause has previously
been linked to smoking and alcohol consumption.
38
The elevated risk of spinal disc herniation could be spu-
rious, however, the association remained significant across sex
and follow-up periods. Although conflicting evidence exists,
an association between levels of stress, pain pressure sensi-
tivity, and depressive symptoms could indicate an increased
pain sensitivity among bereaved people.
39,40
Additionally, be-
reavement is associated with weight loss, and unexpected
weight loss may precede back pain.
41,42
A lower risk of some physical diagnoses was noted for
spouses bereaved by a partner’s suicide, particularly within the
first 5 years, although there was an excess in overall mortal-
ity. People bereaved by a spouse’s suicide might be less in-
clined to seek medical attention for health concerns (eg, being
distracted by their grief to a degree of self-neglect),
4
and the
partially lower use of somatic hospitals supports this notion.
Competing risks, as reflected in the elevated risk of mortality,
is another possible explanation.
E6
JAMA Psychiatry
Published online March 22, 2017
(Reprinted)
Mortality
Those bereaved by suicide had higher rate ratios of overall mor-
tality than the general population and those bereaved by other
manners. To our knowledge, excess mortality has not been
studied among spouses bereaved by suicide, but has been
shown to exist among bereaved spouses generally.
38
Most of
these deaths were natural deaths (men: 81%; women: 75%);
thus, a person’s neglect of his or her health could be a poten-
tial explanation.
The excess risk of suicide is supported by previous
studies.
12,24
Exposure to a loss by suicide might lessen barri-
ers to engage in suicidal behavior.
43
Assortative mating is an-
other option,
12
which is supported by higher suicide risks
among spouses bereaved by suicide than other family
members.
44
The increased risk of dying by homicide is, to our knowl-
edge, a new observation. Although homicides recorded on the
same or following day after a spouse’s suicide were not in-
cluded, some of these cases might be dyadic suicides.
45
Social Health
Increased risks of having a single marital status, low income, and
criminal conduct have been reported for parents and children
bereaved by suicide, but we have no information on the social
health of spouses.
11,20
The observed lower risk of getting a di-
vorce could imply a more precautious partner selection. The
jamapsychiatry.com
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017
SUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 314: Henvendelse af 16/5-17 fra Dansk Forskningsinstitut for Selvmordsforebyggelse vedr. hjælp til efterladte efter selvmord
1757642_0007.png
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental, Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
Original Investigation
Research
Figure 2. Women Bereaved by Suicide Compared With Women Bereaved by Other Manners of Death
Over a 5-Year Follow-up (Group B)
Any mental disorder
Mood disorders
Posttraumatic stress disorder
Anxiety disorders
Alcohol use disorder
Drug use disorder
Prescribed antidepressants
Deliberate self-harm
Cancer
Diabetes
Sleep disorder
Cardiovascular diseases
Chronic lower respiratory tract diseases
Liver cirrhosis
Spinal disc herniation
Any death
Natural death
Unintentional
Suicide
Homicide
a
Divorce
Children placed outside home
Municipal family support
Sick leave
Unemployed
Disability pension
Somatic hospitalization
Psychiatric hospitalization
General practitioner contact
Psych/psychiatric consultation
0
1
2
3
4
Rate Ratio
5
6
7
8
Multivariate models were adjusted
for the calendar period, country of
birth, age group, civil status,
household income level, presence of
physical disorder (measured using
the Charlson Index), previous
psychiatric hospitalization, and
previous record of self-harm.
a
The rate ratio for homicide was
33.8; 95% CI, 22.0-51.8.
fewer episodes of taking sick leave days or experiencing unem-
ployment when compared with people bereaved by other man-
ners might relate to the social stigmatization of suicide.
42
The
mean age (>67 years) for those bereaved by other manners of
death implies that only a subsample were working and assor-
tative mating might have increased their rate of absence.
Health Care Use
Increased mental health care use was noted. The reduced
use of somatic hospitals is contradictive to the excess mor-
tality among spouses bereaved by suicide and raises con-
cerns regarding the identification and the treatment of
health conditions.
Clinical Implications
It is important to note that most people bereaved by suicide
do not experience health complications; 1 in 200 spouses be-
reaved by suicide received a diagnosis of a mood disorder com-
pared with 1 in 500 among the general population.
Women bereaved by suicide had less contact with their
general practitioners than the general population, and men be-
reaved by suicide had less primary care contact than those be-
reaved by other manners of death. This is concerning, as pri-
mary care could provide an access point for support and
suggests the need for more aggressive outreach following be-
reavement by suicide.
jamapsychiatry.com
Studies have linked spousal bereavement to compli-
cated grief.
4
Furthermore, this association could be medi-
ated through other mental disorders.
46
An elevated risk of
misuse disorders was noted for people bereaved by suicide.
Future research might address whether mental disorders
following bereavement could be an indication of a compli-
cated grief.
36
Short-term interventions have shown promising results re-
garding treating complicated grief.
5,47
In Denmark, people be-
reaved by suicide are entitled to state-subsidized treatment with
a psychologist or psychiatrist.
5,48
Although bereaved spouses
used mental health care, the elevated risks of adverse social out-
comes illustrates the high societal costs and need for profes-
sional help. Still, most support for those bereaved by suicide is
left for volunteer organizations.
49
Strengths and Limitations
Nationwide register data were collected on a uniform basis for
both exposed and unexposed people, which improved inter-
nal validity and avoided recall bias. By including all spouses
bereaved by suicide, the selection bias noted in previous stud-
ies was avoided.
24
Longitudinal data on civil statuses and
household identifiers let us identify those living together at
the time of bereavement. Additionally, the large sample size,
the long observation period, and no loss to follow-up were other
strengths.
(Reprinted)
JAMA Psychiatry
Published online March 22, 2017
E7
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017
SUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 314: Henvendelse af 16/5-17 fra Dansk Forskningsinstitut for Selvmordsforebyggelse vedr. hjælp til efterladte efter selvmord
1757642_0008.png
Research
Original Investigation
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental, Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
Limitations include that only people who had entered
a formal union or cohabitation were considered. Danish
suicide records might underestimate the actual figure,
although a recent study noted a good reliability.
50
Also,
hospital diagnoses might represent underestimates of actual
incidences.
5 1
The effect of stressful exposures might
be modified through personality traits, individual coping
strategies, the presence of children and social support or
intensified though multimorbidity.
52
Although the analysis
was adjusted for relevant covariates, unmeasured con-
founders cannot be excluded. Similarly, type I errors are
possible. The findings are representative of Scandinavia but
might also apply to other countries with different social
structures and cultural values, or different ethnic or racial
composition.
Conclusions
Bereavement following suicide constitutes a psychological
stressor and remains a public health burden. The excess risk
of mental disorders, select physical disorders, mortality, and
adverse social events illustrate the breadth of consequences
of bereavement by spousal suicide. Furthermore, we find in-
dications that people bereaved by spousal suicide had higher
risks of mental disorders, mortality, and mental health care use
than people bereaved by other manners of death. Higher risks
of drug and alcohol use disorder were noted for people be-
reaved by suicide. More proactive outreach and linkage to sup-
port mechanisms is needed for people bereaved by spousal
suicide to help them navigate their grief.
ARTICLE INFORMATION
Accepted for Publication:
January 31, 2017.
Published Online:
March 22, 2017.
doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0226
Author Affiliations:
Danish Research Institute for
Suicide Prevention, Mental Health Centre,
Copenhagen, Denmark (Erlangsen, Krogh,
Nordentoft); Department of Mental Health, Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,
Baltimore, Maryland (Erlangsen, Wilcox); iPSYCH,
Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative
Psychiatric Research, Copenhagen, Denmark
(Erlangsen, Nordentoft); Institute of Regional
Health Research, University of Southern Denmark,
Odense, Denmark (Erlangsen); Centre for
Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical
Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm,
Sweden (Runeson); Department of Psychiatry,
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada (Bolton); Department of Psychiatry and
Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of
Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Wilcox); Section of
Biostatistics, Department of Public Health,
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
(Forman); Columbia School of Social Work,
Columbia University College of Physicians and
Surgeons, New York, New York (Shear); Center for
the Study and Prevention of Suicide, Department
of Psychiatry, and Office for Aging, University of
Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
(Conwell).
Author Contributions:
Dr Erlangsen had full access
to all the data in the study and takes responsibility
for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the
data analysis.
Study concept and design:
Erlangsen, Runeson,
Bolton, Wilcox, Forman, Shear, Conwell.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:
Erlangsen, Runeson, Bolton, Wilcox, Forman,
Krogh, Nordentoft, Conwell.
Drafting of the manuscript:
Erlangsen.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important
intellectual content:
All authors.
Statistical analysis:
Erlangsen, Runeson, Wilcox,
Forman.
Obtained funding:
Erlangsen, Nordentoft, Conwell.
Administrative, technical, or material support:
Nordentoft.
Supervision:
Runeson, Wilcox, Forman, Krogh,
Nordentoft, Conwell.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures:
None reported.
E8
Funding/Support:
The study was supported by
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and
the Danish Health Insurance Foundation.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor:
The American
Foundation for Suicide Prevention and the Danish
Health Insurance Foundation had no role in the
design and conduct of the study; collection,
management, analysis, and interpretation of the
data; preparation, review, or approval of the
manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript
for publication
REFERENCES
1.
World Health Organization. Preventing suicide:
a global imperative.
http://apps.who.int/iris
/bitstream/10665/131056/1/9789241564779_eng
.pdf?ua.
Accessed November 27, 2014.
2.
Berman AL. Estimating the population of
survivors of suicide: seeking an evidence base.
Suicide Life Threat Behav.
2011;41(1):110-116.
3.
Dunne-Maxim K. Survivors of suicide.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv.
1986;24(12):
31-35.
4.
Shear K, Shair H. Attachment, loss, and
complicated grief.
Dev Psychobiol.
2005;47(3):
253-267.
5.
Shear MK, Reynolds CF III, Simon NM, et al.
Optimizing treatment of complicated grief:
a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Psychiatry.
2016;
73(7):685-694.
6.
McDaid C, Trowman R, Golder S, Hawton K,
Sowden A. Interventions for people bereaved
through suicide: systematic review.
Br J Psychiatry.
2008;193(6):438-443.
7.
Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon L. Strategies for
measuring stress in studies of psychiatric and
physical disorders. In: Cohen S, Kessler RC,
Gordon L, eds.
Measuring Stress.
New York, NY,
Oxford University Press; 1997:3-28.
8.
Brent DA, Moritz G, Bridge J, Perper J,
Canobbio R. The impact of adolescent suicide on
siblings and parents: a longitudinal follow-up.
Suicide Life Threat Behav.
1996;26(3):253-259.
9.
Cerel J, Fristad MA, Weller EB, Weller RA.
Suicide-bereaved children and adolescents:
a controlled longitudinal examination.
J Am Acad
Child Adolesc Psychiatry.
1999;38(6):672-679.
10.
Dyregrov K, Dyregrov A. Siblings after
suicide—“the forgotten bereaved.”
Suicide Life
Threat Behav.
2005;35(6):714-724.
11.
Wilcox HC, Kuramoto SJ, Lichtenstein P,
Långström N, Brent DA, Runeson B. Psychiatric
morbidity, violent crime, and suicide among
children and adolescents exposed to parental
death.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.
2010;49
(5):514-523.
12.
Agerbo E. Midlife suicide risk, partner’s
psychiatric illness, spouse and child bereavement
by suicide or other modes of death: a gender
specific study.
J Epidemiol Community Health.
2005;59(5):407-412.
13.
Maple M, Cerel J, Sanford R, Pearce T, Jordan J.
Is exposure to suicide beyond kin associated with
risk for suicidal behavior? a systematic review of the
evidence [Published online October 27, 2016].
Suicide Life Threat Behav.
doi:10.1111/sltb.12308
14.
Reiche EM, Nunes SO, Morimoto HK. Stress,
depression, the immune system, and cancer.
Lancet
Oncol.
2004;5(10):617-625.
15.
McEwen BS. Mood disorders and allostatic load.
Biol Psychiatry.
2003;54(3):200-207.
16.
McEwen BS. Stress, adaptation, and disease.
allostasis and allostatic load.
Ann N Y Acad Sci.
1998;840(1):33-44.
17.
Fang F, Fall K, Mittleman MA, et al. Suicide and
cardiovascular death after a cancer diagnosis.
N Engl J Med.
2012;366(14):1310-1318.
18.
Irwin M, Pike J. Bereavement, depressive
symptoms, and immune function. In: Stroebe W,
Hansson RO, eds.
Handbook of Bereavement:
Theory, Research, and Intervention. Cambridge,
United Kingdom.
Stroebe, MS: Cambridge University
Press; 1999:160-172.
19.
Irwin M, Patterson T, Smith TL, et al. Reduction
of immune function in life stress and depression.
Biol Psychiatry.
1990;27(1):22-30.
20.
Bolton JM, Au W, Leslie WD, et al. Parents
bereaved by offspring suicide: a population-based
longitudinal case-control study.
JAMA Psychiatry.
2013;70(2):158-167.
21.
Agerbo E. Risk of suicide and spouse’s
psychiatric illness or suicide: nested case-control
study.
BMJ.
2003;327(7422):1025-1026.
22.
Kessing LV, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB. Does the
impact of major stressful life events on the risk of
JAMA Psychiatry
Published online March 22, 2017
(Reprinted)
jamapsychiatry.com
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017
SUU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 314: Henvendelse af 16/5-17 fra Dansk Forskningsinstitut for Selvmordsforebyggelse vedr. hjælp til efterladte efter selvmord
1757642_0009.png
Association Between Spousal Suicide and Mental, Physical, and Social Health Outcomes
Original Investigation
Research
developing depression change throughout life?
Psychol Med.
2003;33(7):1177-1184.
23.
Séguin M, Lesage A, Kiely MC. Parental
bereavement after suicide and accident:
a comparative study.
Suicide Life Threat Behav.
1995;25(4):489-492.
24.
Pitman A, Osborn D, King M, Erlangsen A.
Effects of suicide bereavement on mental health
and suicide risk.
Lancet Psychiatry.
2014;1(1):86-94.
25.
Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration
System.
Scand J Public Health.
2011;39(7)(suppl):
22-25.
26.
Helweg-Larsen K. The Danish Register of
Causes of Death.
Scand J Public Health.
2011;39(7)
(suppl):26-29.
27.
Mors O, Perto GP, Mortensen PB. The Danish
Psychiatric Central Research Register.
Scand J Public
Health.
2011;39(7)(suppl):54-57.
28.
Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jørgensen J,
Mellemkjoer L, Olsen JH. The Danish National
Hospital Register. a valuable source of data for
modern health sciences.
Dan Med Bull.
1999;46(3):
263-268.
29.
Baadsgaard M, Quitzau J. Danish registers on
personal income and transfer payments.
Scand J
Public Health.
2011;39(7)(suppl):103-105.
30.
Erlangsen A, Fedyszyn I. Danish nationwide
registers for public health and health-related
research.
Scand J Public Health.
2015;43(4):333-339.
31.
International Statistical Classification of
Diseases and Related Health Problems.
8th revision
ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;
1965.
32.
International Statistical Classification of
Diseases and Related Health Problems. 2007; 10th
revision.
http://apps.who.int/classifications/apps
/icd/icd10online/.
Accessed July 30, 2016.
33.
Christensen G. The Building and Housing
Register.
Scand J Public Health.
2011;39(7)(suppl):
106-108.
34.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL,
MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying
prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies:
development and validation.
J Chronic Dis.
1987;40
(5):373-383.
35.
SAS system for SunOP
[computer program].
Version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2003.
36.
Pilling J, Thege BK, Demetrovics Z, Kopp MS.
Alcohol use in the first three years of bereavement:
a national representative survey.
Subst Abuse Treat
Prev Policy.
2012;7(1):3.
37.
Mansfield AJ, Kaufman JS, Marshall SW,
Gaynes BN, Morrissey JP, Engel CC. Deployment
and the use of mental health services among U.S.
Army wives.
N Engl J Med.
2010;362(2):101-109.
38.
Martikainen P, Valkonen T. Mortality after the
death of a spouse: rates and causes of death in a
large Finnish cohort.
Am J Public Health.
1996;86
(8):1087-1093.
39.
Bergmann N, Ballegaard S, Bech P, et al.
The effect of daily self-measurement of pressure
pain sensitivity followed by acupressure on
depression and quality of life versus treatment as
usual in ischemic heart disease: a randomized
clinical trial.
PLoS One.
2014;9(5):e97553.
40.
Marras WS, Davis KG, Heaney CA,
Maronitis AB, Allread WG. The influence of
psychosocial stress, gender, and personality on
mechanical loading of the lumbar spine.
Spine (Phila
Pa 1976).
2000;25(23):3045-3054.
41.
Waddell G, McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Feder G,
Lewis M.
Clinical Guidelines for the Management of
Acute Low Back Pain.
London, England: Royal College
of General Practitioners; 1999.
42.
Stroebe M, Schut H, Stroebe W. Health
outcomes of bereavement.
Lancet.
2007;370
(9603):1960-1973.
43.
Joiner TE.
Why people die by suicide.
Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press; 2007.
44.
Tidemalm D, Runeson B, Waern M, et al.
Familial clustering of suicide risk: a total population
study of 11.4 million individuals.
Psychol Med.
2011;
41(12):2527-2534.
45.
Berman AL. Dyadic death: a typology.
Suicide
Life Threat Behav.
1996;26(4):342-350.
46.
Simon NM, Shear KM, Thompson EH, et al.
The prevalence and correlates of psychiatric
comorbidity in individuals with complicated grief.
Compr Psychiatry.
2007;48(5):395-399.
47.
Shear K, Frank E, Houck PR, Reynolds CF III.
Treatment of complicated grief: a randomized
controlled trial.
JAMA.
2005;293(21):2601-2608.
48.
Sundhedsstyrelsen. Henvisning til psykolog
[Referal to psychologist].
https://www.sundhed.dk
/sundhedsfaglig/information-til-praksis/sjaelland
/patientforloeb/psykiatrien/hensivning-psykolog.
Accessed November 22, 2016.
49.
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention.
Survivor Outreach Program.
https://afsp.org/find
-support/ive-lost-someone/survivor-outreach
-program/.
Accessed December 23, 2016.
50.
Tøllefsen IM, Helweg-Larsen K, Thiblin I, et al.
Are suicide deaths under-reported? nationwide
re-evaluations of 1800 deaths in Scandinavia.
BMJ
Open.
2015;5(11):e009120.
51.
Wang PS, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, et al.
Use of mental health services for anxiety, mood,
and substance disorders in 17 countries in the WHO
world mental health surveys.
Lancet.
2007;370
(9590):841-850.
52.
Cohen S, Gottlieb BH, Underwood LG. Social
relationships and health: challenges for
measurement and intervention.
Adv Mind Body Med.
2001;17(2):129-141.
jamapsychiatry.com
(Reprinted)
JAMA Psychiatry
Published online March 22, 2017
E9
Copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://jamanetwork.com/pdfaccess.ashx?url=/data/journals/psych/0/ by Copenhagen University Library, Annette Erlangsen on 03/22/2017