Grønlandsudvalget 2016-17
GRU Alm.del Bilag 22
Offentligt
”Greenland, Canada, and the United States: the Arctic Potential”
Speech by Greenland’s Minister for Industry, Labour, Trade, Energy and Foreign Affairs,
Mr. Vittus Qujaukitsoq. The Arctic Circle Quebec Forum, Quebec City, December 12th 2016
Distinguished participants - Ladies and Gentlemen, Welcome to the Arctic Circle Quebec
Forum.
First of all, I want to recognize the important leadership provided by former President
Grimsson, not only in establishing the Arctic Circle in 2013 and bringing this forum to the
regions of the Arctic, but more importantly for his efforts over 20 years of his Presidency in
working with Greenland’s leaders. For several generations of leaders in Greenland, President
Grimsson has been more than a good neighbour. In President Grimsson, Greenland has had an
advocate and an ally. An ally whom I am personally proud to call my friend.
Greenland had the honour of hosting an Arctic Circle Greenland Forum in May, earlier this
year, so I know what an impact a Forum can have. At the Arctic Circle Greenland Forum we
brought together Arctic indigenous and business leaders to talk about the type of
developments we want to see in the Arctic for our regions and peoples. We had a particular
focus in Nuuk in May on bringing indigenous leaders from across Alaska, Arctic Canada and
Scandinavia together with Greenlandic and Icelandic business leaders to try and see how the
increasing attention the Arctic is attracting internationally, can be transformed into real
economic development for our peoples.
I think it is a very natural next step for the Arctic Circle to come to Quebec today with a shared
focus on achieving and supporting sustainable development across our Northern regions.
In my intervention, I really want to try to focus your attention on something that has been
troubling me for the past many years. It is the fact that despite Alaska, Arctic Canada and
Greenland’s geographical closeness, our shared Inuit heritage, the close cooperation between
our respective capitals, there continues to be so little cooperation and economic exchange
between our Arctic regions.
When I met Premier Couillard for the first time, in October 2015 at the Arctic Circle Assembly
in Reykjavik, I asked him why there is so little cooperation between Greenland and Quebec –
despite all our similarities and our common culture and history, and I found that I was not
alone in asking this question. Already then the Plan Nord was a comprehensive policy
platform for development, providing answers for Quebec to the call for development of its
1
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
North. With the Plan Nord, Quebec has really put the economic development of its Northern
regions on the agenda, in a way that embraces the aspirations and needs of Northern
communities for securing sustainable livelihoods that allow people to live in dignity and at a
standard of living we can be proud of.
Last month a new broad government coalition was formed in Greenland. The new coalition
brings together mandates of 80% of the electorate. The central theme which brings together
this very broad coalition, is a shared desire to substantially speed up Greenland’s work
towards achieving the economic foundations necessary for Greenland to achieve its
independence from Denmark.
Since 2009, when Greenland successfully negotiated the terms of its future independence
from Denmark, with the Danish State, we have been working towards the goal of Greenland’s
independence. This is why in 2010 Greenland assumed full legislative and executive powers
regarding minerals and oil and gas resources in Greenland.
Seen from Nuuk, Greenland, the lack of attention to inter-regional economic development in
the North-American Arctic has been due in part, to a general lack of attention paid by
Washington, Ottawa and Copenhagen to our Arctic regions. Partly, it is of course very much
related to the very different historical experiences of our regions.
With the current United States’ chairmanship of the Arctic Council, many of us had high hopes
that this could somehow change - that the rare attention of Washington policy-makers to the
Artic part of the United States and the potentials of this region, would awaken policy-makers
to the huge opportunities that our regions offer in areas that include hydropower, minerals,
water resources, oil, gas and our huge resources of fish and wildlife.
But with the end of the chairmanship approaching, these hopes were perhaps too optimistic.
Instead of opening up our regions for development, we have seen a chairmanship focusing
perhaps too much on the policies of the past – working to stop oil and gas development in the
U.S. Arctic for example. The establishment of the Arctic Economic Council is a step in the right
direction, but it has yet to prove its value by delivering results in attracting investments to the
Arctic and providing real incentives for increasing cross-border economic development
activities.
With a new administration taking office in Washington in January 2017, I am actually very
optimistic for the near future of our region. The President-elect has made very clear that he
wants economic development for America; he wants to focus on what serves the interests of
Americans best and he will not pander to special interest groups that want to stop economic
development in the North. For the sake of our Arctic region, I sincerely hope that the
President-elect will choose as Secretary of State, an outstanding individual with a
comprehensive experience from the private sector. This will be of benefit to our region.
2
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
If this does happen, this new U.S. administration has the opportunity to really make a positive
difference in the lives of people living in the U.S.’ North. And this can have positive
implications for Northerners also in Canada and in Greenland, if we succeed in creating
increased regional cooperation.
In Greenland we share our Inuit language with languages across Arctic Canada and Alaska
stretching across the Bering Strait into Siberia. This is the heritage, that reminds us of the
migrations that took place thousands of years ago, which populated Greenland in successive
historical waves. During the 1970s a political movement of Inuit across North America, led to
the creation of today’s Inuit Circumpolar Council. But this political movement, although a
powerful force in shaping political developments within Greenland, has failed to develop
more economic interaction in our shared region.
What does Greenland do, to foster this type of inter-regional development I am talking about,
and why is it not happening by itself if the economic case is sound?
First of all, the Arctic is not economically, logistically or in any other respect one region. We
are several regions with different legal and judicial traditions and frameworks. This is why the
eight Arctic Council states are not necessarily the right forum to really advance inter-regional
economic development. The five Arctic Coastal States are also not one region, in any practical
sense, other than in collectively managing the Arctic High Seas, in fisheries and in the
competing continental shelf claims to be determined over the coming years. In both cases, the
driving role of capitals Copenhagen, Washington D.C. and Ottawa have hampered more than
helped, in creating actual regional cooperation delivering results to Arctic citizens.
The Arctic Circle Assembly and its regional Forums, actually provide just such a platform,
allowing for the types of exchanges, which are not possible in the formal settings of the Arctic
Council and the Arctic Five Coastal States.
To advance, we also need to look much more at particular regional contexts. As an example,
during these years, Greenland and Iceland are establishing cooperation in a number of areas,
that will radically change Greenland’s access to the rest of the world and the rest of the
world’s access to Greenland.
For the past three hundred years, all shipping, transport and later airlinks from Greenland
have gone to Europe through Denmark. None have gone to our neighbors - Canada or the U.S. -
to the West. This is being changed. Earlier this year, our Royal Arctic Line concluded a very
ambitious joint venture agreement with Iceland’s Eimskip which combined with our major
container-port construction in Nuuk, will enable Greenland’s shipping links to go both East to
Iceland and to the main ports in Europe, as well as West to Canada and the United States.
Similarly, Iceland’s Air Iceland has over the past five years opened up Greenland to air
transport from the whole world through Keflavik International Airport. Starting from nothing,
3
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
Air Iceland today serves 6 destinations in Greenland. Before this the only international
connection to Greenland was through Copenhagen in another continent across the Atlantic.
What needs to be done next?
In Greenland we have vast resources of minerals and offshore oil and gas. In the minerals
sector, which is the most promising new sector to supplement our reliance on high-quality
seafood exports, it is Canadian - and Australian companies – that are pioneering
developments.
At the same time, one of our main two global seafood companies - Royal Greenland - is
actively looking to invest in the Canadian seafood sector. Our companies in this sector are big
players, with Greenland being the largest cold-water shrimp exporter in the world.
In Greenland, scientists are also conducting world-class ice-sheet research with literally
hundreds of research projects ongoing, financed by the U.S. National Science Foundation and
with Canadian universities also very active in this area.
My Government last year negotiated a decision to radically upgrade Greenland’s airport
infrastructure, which will allow Greenland to trade, travel and develop like other regions of
the world. Because in the Arctic, I see very clearly, that our primary barriers are physical.
Once, our container-port in Nuuk and the joint venture agreement between Royal Arctic Line
and Eimskip is fully implemented, Greenland will be linked to North America for trade in
goods at a level never tried before.
Similarly, with the upgrade of our airport infrastructure over the coming years, it is only a
matter of time, before we reestablish our first airlink to Canada or the United States run
commercially by a Canadian or American operator. The sooner this happens, the better.
Physical links create opportunities. And physical barriers in our region, have for too long kept
us apart.
But why stop here? In the North American Arctic, we share a military commitment to protect
our continent. We have military bases across our region, but with different set-ups and
arrangements.
In Alaska, Alaska Native Corporations service U.S. military installations to the extent that
these Corporations have become some of the most important economic players in Alaska
today. Some of these Native Corporations have built up expertise that is also used to service
U.S. military bases overseas, in particular in running bases, but also in cleaning up abandoned
military sites. I don’t see why Alaska Native Corporations should not also work in Greenland,
in cooperation with Greenlandic companies, in servicing bases and cleaning up abandoned
military sites.
4
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
But creating links is also about more than physical infrastructure. We need to talk together.
From Nuuk to Quebec. From Nuuk to Ottawa and from Nuuk to Washington. This is why in
2014, Greenland opened its diplomatic Representation to the United States in Washington
D.C. This Representation is our second Representation overseas, with our first Representation
to the European Union in Brussels next year celebrating its 25
th
anniversary. In 2015 our
Head of Representation became accredited also to Canada.
We started our Representation in Washington D.C. with one person. By the end of this year,
we expect to have four people employed in Washington D.C., working to create permanent
links between Greenland and Canada and the United States.
In 2013, Iceland also opened its consulate in Nuuk, Greenland, which was a very significant
development. Iceland’s Consul-General is the first permanent diplomatic presence posted in
Greenland since the end of World War II.
I would like to issue this invitation to the incoming US administration, to look afresh at our
region. Look at the economic potentials that our Arctic regions hold.
In Greenland we are open for business. Why not envisage having an American and a Canadian
permanent diplomatic presence in Nuuk within the coming four years, to make sure that the
potentials are fully developed?
Many of you in the audience today will not be aware, to what extent the United States has
already been instrumental in the development of the modern Greenland that exists today.
The story of the U.S. military in Greenland – similar to our push today to create physical and
diplomatic links – is a story of opening up. When Greenland was cut off from Denmark in 1941
with the occupation of Denmark by Germany, Greenland entered into a defense agreement
with the United States of America on its own.
During this period, the U.S.’ Consulate-General in Greenland was opened, bases were
constructed along the coast. And Greenlanders experienced for the first time, a world beyond
the Arctic that was not the colonial power Denmark.
The American period in Greenland, is remembered by Greenlanders as a period of great
promise, of innovation, of commercial development with mining activities, and of friendship
with our American allies.
In our Arctic societies we need to educate our children and youth, and we also have to be able
to afford taking care of our weaker and older citizens. Just like in any other society. We do not
want to develop in order only to get rich in material terms. We want to develop in order to
sustain ourselves and take care of our people. This is why it is imperative for my Government,
that we create new income opportunities in a sustainable manner.
5
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
In terms of new sectors of interest for greater cooperation in the North American Arctic, the
Greenlandic minerals sector is important. The first ruby and sapphire mine is now coming on-
stream. We will probably also see the first loads of the industrial product anorthosite shipped
to customers next year, in a project where the European Investment Bank is co-financing.
Other mining projects are also near handing in applications for the extraction of minerals.
Greenland also has an abundance of clean fresh drinking water, ice and biological resources,
and we now have legislation in place, which will form a good framework for initiatives to
export clean fresh water, ice and biological resources.
In all areas we are open to partners from abroad.
I hope here today, that my invitation to our American and Canadian partners to participate
even more actively in developments in Greenland is received and hopefully acknowledged.
It would be a great result if we as a group, could come up with even more ways in which we
can work together. Why only fisheries and mining and research? Why are we not working
more together in other sectors. My invitation to collaborate, in principle covers all areas.
Because I think there is so much more we can do to work to promote a sustainable
development of our Arctic region.
The United States and Canada have always been important to Greenland. But there is potential
for so much more, if we work more closely together.
With these words, I wish you all a useful debate.
Qujanaq – Thank you.
6