Forsvarsudvalget 2015-16
FOU Alm.del
Offentligt
1631840_0001.png
Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)
RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-198
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)
As of FY 2017 President's Budget
Defense Acquisition Management
Information Retrieval
(DAMIR)
UNCLASSIFIED
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0002.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Table of Contents
Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs
Program Information
Responsible Office
References
Mission and Description
Executive Summary
Threshold Breaches
Schedule
Performance
Track to Budget
Cost and Funding
Low Rate Initial Production
Foreign Military Sales
Nuclear Costs
Unit Cost
Cost Variance
Contracts
Deliveries and Expenditures
Operating and Support Cost
3
5
5
6
7
8
11
12
16
20
24
65
66
66
67
73
81
89
90
UNCLASSIFIED
2
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0003.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs
Acq O&M - Acquisition-Related Operations and Maintenance
ACAT - Acquisition Category
ADM - Acquisition Decision Memorandum
APB - Acquisition Program Baseline
APPN - Appropriation
APUC - Average Procurement Unit Cost
$B - Billions of Dollars
BA - Budget Authority/Budget Activity
Blk - Block
BY - Base Year
CAPE - Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
CARD - Cost Analysis Requirements Description
CDD - Capability Development Document
CLIN - Contract Line Item Number
CPD - Capability Production Document
CY - Calendar Year
DAB - Defense Acquisition Board
DAE - Defense Acquisition Executive
DAMIR - Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
DoD - Department of Defense
DSN - Defense Switched Network
EMD - Engineering and Manufacturing Development
EVM - Earned Value Management
FOC - Full Operational Capability
FMS - Foreign Military Sales
FRP - Full Rate Production
FY - Fiscal Year
FYDP - Future Years Defense Program
ICE - Independent Cost Estimate
IOC - Initial Operational Capability
Inc - Increment
JROC - Joint Requirements Oversight Council
$K - Thousands of Dollars
KPP - Key Performance Parameter
LRIP - Low Rate Initial Production
$M - Millions of Dollars
MDA - Milestone Decision Authority
MDAP - Major Defense Acquisition Program
MILCON - Military Construction
N/A - Not Applicable
O&M - Operations and Maintenance
ORD - Operational Requirements Document
OSD - Office of the Secretary of Defense
O&S - Operating and Support
PAUC - Program Acquisition Unit Cost
UNCLASSIFIED
3
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0004.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
PB - President’s Budget
PE - Program Element
PEO - Program Executive Officer
PM - Program Manager
POE - Program Office Estimate
RDT&E - Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
SAR - Selected Acquisition Report
SCP - Service Cost Position
TBD - To Be Determined
TY - Then Year
UCR - Unit Cost Reporting
U.S. - United States
USD(AT&L) - Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)
UNCLASSIFIED
4
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0005.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Program Information
Program Name
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35)
DoD Component
DoD
Joint Participants
United States Navy; United States Air Force; United States Marine Corps; United Kingdom; Italy; The Netherlands; Turkey;
Canada; Australia; Denmark; Norway
The F-35 Program is a joint DoD program for which Service Acquisition Executive Authority alternates between the
Department of the Navy (DoN) and the Department of the Air Force, and currently resides with the DoN.
Responsible Office
Lt Gen Christopher Bogdan
F-35 Lightning II Program Office
200 12th St South
Suite 600
Arlington, VA 22202-5402
[email protected]
Phone:
Fax:
DSN Phone:
DSN Fax:
Date Assigned:
703-601-5602
703-602-7649
329-5650
December 6, 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
5
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0006.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
References
F-35 Aircraft
SAR Baseline (Development Estimate)
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 26, 2012
Approved APB
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated June 18, 2014
F-35 Engine
SAR Baseline (Development Estimate)
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated March 26, 2012
Approved APB
Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated June 18, 2014
UNCLASSIFIED
6
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0007.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Mission and Description
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Aircraft (F-35) Program will develop and field an affordable, highly common family of next-
generation strike aircraft for the U.S. Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and allies. The three variants are the F-35A; F-35B;
and the F-35C. The F-35A will be a stealthy multi-role aircraft, primarily air-to-ground, for the Air Force to replace the F-16
and A-10 and complement the F-22. The F-35B variant will be a multi-role strike fighter aircraft to replace the AV-8B and F/A
-18A/C/D for the Marine Corps. The F-35C will provide the U.S. Navy a multi-role, stealthy strike fighter aircraft to
complement the F/A-18E/F. The planned DoD F-35 Fleet will replace the joint services' legacy fleets. The transition from
multiple type/model/series to a common platform will result in a smaller total force over time and operational and overall cost
efficiencies.
UNCLASSIFIED
7
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0008.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Executive Summary
The F-35 remains the DoD’s largest cooperative acquisition program, with eight International Partners participating with the
U.S. under Memorandums of Understanding for System Development and Demonstration (SDD) and Production,
Sustainment and Follow-on Development. Additionally, the program currently has three FMS customers. The F-35 program
is executing well across the entire spectrum of acquisition, to include development and design, flight test, production,
fielding and base stand-up, sustainment of fielded aircraft, and building a global sustainment enterprise.
The program is transitioning from slow and steady progress to a rapidly growing and accelerating Program. However, the
Program is not without risks and challenges. The completion of Mission Systems Software development and Autonomic
Logistics Information System (ALIS) development are the most prominent, current technical risks. The ability to standup four
separate Reprogramming Labs, complete all weapons envelope testing for Block 3F, and start Operational Test (OT) on
time, constitute the main schedule risks. Program leadership remains confident that it will deliver the full F-35 capability as
promised.
Successes and challenges in 2015: The F-35 Program closed out 2015 by executing the plan for test flights, total test points
and baseline test points. The test teams at Edwards Air Force Base (AFB) and Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, MD
completed 1374 actual flights (plan: 1286), 9582 total test points (plan: 9427) and 7798 baseline test points (plan: 7786).
The Program also met the production goal for the year by accepting its 45th aircraft delivery. This represented a 25 percent
increase from last year’s goal that was also met: the most aircraft delivered in one year in program history. These deliveries
included the first international delivery from the Italian Final Assembly and Check Out (FACO), and bring the overall
operational delivery total to 157 (146 U.S. aircraft as reflected in the Deliveries and Expenditure Section of the SAR, and 11
International Partner Aircraft) as of February 3, 2016. Along with Italy, Norway took its first delivery in 2015. Five partner
nations: Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom, along with the Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy,
now fly the F-35. Israel and Japan will take their first deliveries in 2016.
Block 3i software was released for flight test in May 2015, to support the U.S. Air Force IOC declaration later in 2016. Coding
for the final development software block 3F, was completed in June 2015 and the software has been released for flight
testing. Additional updates are planned throughout the year with 3F tracking for completion by the end of the SDD in the fall
of 2017, to support U.S. Navy IOC in 2018 and the start of Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E). Throughout
testing, interim software test builds are provided to both the developmental test and operational test teams, allowing them to
experience the software as early as possible and provide feedback. As of December 31, 2015, the program completed 80
percent of SDD test points and is on track for completion in the fourth quarter of 2017.
At the completion of the F-35 SDD program, the objective is to deliver full Block 3F capabilities (Mission Systems, Weapons
& Flight Envelope) for the Services and International customers. The F-35 program will continue to coordinate closely with
the JSF Operational Test Team and Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, on key test planning and priorities to
successfully meet significant SDD program milestones and objectives.
Currently, mission systems software and the ALIS system, are the program’s top technical risks. Disciplined systems
engineering processes, addressing the complexity of writing, testing, and integrating mission systems and ALIS software,
have improved the delivery of capability, although challenges remain.
F-35 Total Program Cost:
The BY dollar increase in RDT&E of approximately $300M is the result of a transfer of money from the Procurement
account to the RDT&E account to fund the modification of 24 OT aircraft for IOT&E. This transfer out of Procurement into
RDT&E had a zero net effect on Total Program Cost.
The BY dollar reduction in the estimated $7.5B Procurement Costs through the life of the program was the result of a
combination of increases and decreases within the Procurement account. Elements of the account that increased when
compared to last year's SAR estimate included increased labor rates, the addition of Electronic Warfare Band 2/5 capability
UNCLASSIFIED
8
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0009.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
and updating the quantity profile. Elements in the account that decreased included; updated actuals for aircraft and engine
cost, and a change in inflation indices.
The net BY dollar increase in the estimated O&S of $23B (CAPE) and $43.3B (Joint Program Office (JPO)) were the result
of both increases and decreases within the O&S account, with U.S. Services' changes in aircraft life expectancy and bed
down plans overshadowing real reductions in O&S costs.
Business perspective: The price of the F-35 variants continues to decline steadily. For example, the price (including
airframe, engine and profit) of an LRIP Lot 8 aircraft was approximately 3.6 percent less than an LRIP Lot 7 aircraft, and an
LRIP Lot 7 aircraft, was 4.2 percent lower than an LRIP Lot 6 aircraft. LRIP Lots 9 and 10 contract negotiations are nearing
completion and the contract award is anticipated by late spring of this year.
The F-35 JPO is exploring the possibility of entering into a Block Buy Contract, for LRIP Lots 12-14 (FY 2018- FY2020). A
block buy would enable the JPO to save a significant amount of money by allowing the contractors to use Economic Order
Quantity purchases; enabling manufacturers to maximize production economies of scale, through bulk orders.
Earlier this year, the program reached agreement with Pratt & Whitney on the next two lots of F135 propulsion systems.
The LRIP Lots 9 and 10 will continue the price improvements realized on previous lots and the F135 engine is meeting War
on Cost commitments. For calendar year 2015, F135 production deliveries met contract requirements. However, recurring
manufacturing quality issues continue to hamper consistent engine deliveries. Recent quality escapes on turbine blades and
electronic control systems resulted in maintenance activity to remove suspect hardware from the operational fleet. Pratt &
Whitney has taken action to improve quality surveillance within their manufacturing processes and program office
manufacturing quality experts have engaged to ensure quality improvements are in place to meet production ramp
requirements.
Sustainment: Last year the JPO provided information regarding its efforts toward the establishment of the Global
Sustainment posture across Europe, Asia-Pacific and North America. In 2015, the F-35’s strong international team made
marked progress in delivering this capability to F-35 users and the program is on track to standing up regional Maintenance,
Repair, Overhaul, and Upgrade (MRO&U) capabilities for airframes and engines, for both the European and Pacific
Regions. These initial MRO&U assignments will support near-term F-35 airframe and engine overseas operations and
maintenance and will be reviewed and updated approximately every five years.
In the European region, Italy will provide F-35 initial airframe MRO&U capability in 2018. Also in 2018, engine heavy
maintenance in the European region will initially be provided by Turkey. The Netherlands and Norway will provide additional
engine heavy maintenance approximately two-to-three years after Turkey’s initial capability.
In the Pacific region, F-35 airframe MRO&U capability will be provided by Japan for the Northern Pacific and in the Southern
Pacific by Australia, with both capabilities required by early 2018. For F-35 engine heavy maintenance in the Pacific, the
initial capability will be provided by Australia by early 2018, with Japan providing additional capability five-to-seven years later.
In 2015, the program also kicked-off initial planning efforts for expansion of component repair into the European and Pacific
regions. Working through the F-35 Regional Capabilities Working Group forum, efforts began to identify ‘best value’ repair
sources in each region for approximately 18 key depot-level repairable items. Early program analysis indicates that grouping
certain components by common repair, test set and skills, can yield life cycle cost savings. Partners and their industries will
be requested to propose groupings, that leverage their strongest industrial competencies, to deliver optimum repair
capability at best cost to the global sustainment solution.
International and FMS: International participation in the program remains strong and the program is now training International
Partner pilots at Luke AFB.
In 2015, the first Royal Norwegian Air Force, F-35 rolled out and had its first flight from the Fort Worth Texas assembly
facility. The first Italian Air Force, F-35A rolled out of the production facility in Cameri Italy, and a few months later completed
the first F-35 transatlantic flight, landing at Naval Air Station, Patuxent River, Maryland. Additionally, the program began F-
35A aerial refueling flight testing with a Royal Australian Air Force KC-30A tanker and completed F-35A aerial refueling flight
testing with an Italian Air Force KC-767 tanker.
UNCLASSIFIED
9
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0010.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Initial site planning for the standup of maintenance capabilities in Norway, the Netherlands, Turkey, United Kingdom, Israel,
Japan and Korea commenced in 2015. The Japanese FACO assembly facility is now complete with both Electronic Mate
Assembly Stations, tools installed and accepted and the first Japanese F-35A is scheduled to rollout of the facility in
November 2016. Finally, construction and installation activities remain on schedule, with major components currently being
shipped.
In March 2012, in conjunction with the Milestone B decision, certification was made pursuant to section 2366b of title 10,
United States Code (U.S.C.). However, at that time, the MDA waived provision (3)(C) (now 3(G)), which certifies that the
JROC has accomplished its duties pursuant to section 181(b) of title 10, U.S.C., including an analysis of the operational
requirements for the program. The JROC accomplished the bulk of its duties under section 181(b); however, because at
that time, the IOC dates remained "TBD" by the Services, a waiver had been in place. In June 2013, the Services sent a joint
report to the U.S. Congress detailing their IOC requirements and dates. On April 22, 2015, the USD(AT&L) certified that this
provision has been satisfied because IOC Objective and Threshold dates for each of the three Services, Air Force, Marine
Corps, and Navy, have now been established.
UNCLASSIFIED
10
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0011.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Threshold Breaches
F-35 Aircraft
APB Breaches
Schedule
Performance
Cost
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
O&S Cost
Unit Cost
PAUC
APUC
Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline
PAUC
APUC
Original UCR Baseline
PAUC
APUC
None
None
None
None
F-35 Engine
APB Breaches
Schedule
Performance
Cost
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
O&S Cost
Unit Cost
PAUC
APUC
Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline
PAUC
APUC
Original UCR Baseline
PAUC
APUC
None
None
None
None
UNCLASSIFIED
11
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0012.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Schedule
UNCLASSIFIED
12
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0013.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
F-35 Aircraft
Schedule Events
Events
Concept Demonstration Contract Award
Milestone B
EMD Contract Award
Preliminary Design Review
CDR
CDR (CTOL&Common)
CDR (STOVL&Common)
CDR (CV&Common)
DAE (IPR 1)
1st Flt CTOL
DAE (IPR 2)
1st Flt STOVL
1st Flt CV
1st Production Aircraft Delivered
Milestone B Re-approval
Block 2B Fleet Release
USMC IOC
USAF IOC
Block 3F Fleet Release
USN IOC
Completed IOT&E
Full Rate Production Decision
DAB Milestone C
Change Explanations
None
Feb 2006
Feb 2006
Jun 2007
Mar 2006
Dec 2006
Apr 2007
Jun 2008
Jun 2010
May 2011
Mar 2012
Mar 2015
TBD
TBD
Aug 2017
TBD
Feb 2019
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Feb 2006
Feb 2006
Jun 2007
Mar 2006
Dec 2006
Apr 2007
Jun 2008
May 2010
May 2011
Nov 2011
Mar 2015
Jul 2015
Aug 2016
Aug 2017
Aug 2018
Feb 2019
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Feb 2006
Feb 2006
Jun 2007
Mar 2006
Dec 2006
Apr 2007
Jun 2008
May 2010
May 2011
May 2012
Sep 2015
Dec 2015
Dec 2016
Feb 2018
Feb 2019
Aug 2019
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Feb 2006
Feb 2006
Jun 2007
Mar 2006
Dec 2006
Apr 2007
Jun 2008
May 2010
May 2011
Mar 2012
Jun 2015
Jul 2015
Aug 2016
Aug 2017
Aug 2018
Feb 2019
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
SAR Baseline
Development
Estimate
Nov 1996
Oct 2001
Oct 2001
Apr 2003
Current APB
Development
Objective/Threshold
Nov 1996
Oct 2001
Oct 2001
Mar 2003
Nov 1996
Apr 2002
Oct 2001
Mar 2003
Current
Estimate
Nov 1996
Oct 2001
Oct 2001
Mar 2003
UNCLASSIFIED
13
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0014.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Acronyms and Abbreviations
CDR - Critical Design Review
CTOL - Conventional Takeoff and Landing
CV - Aircraft Carrier Suitable Variant
Flt - Flight
IOT&E - Initial Operational Test and Evaluation
IPR - Interim Progress Review
STOVL - Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing
USAF - United States Air Force
USMC - United States Marine Corps
USN - United States Navy
UNCLASSIFIED
14
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0015.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
F-35 Engine
Schedule Events
Events
See Note
Change Explanations
None
Notes
Schedule milestones for the F-35 Engine subprogram are captured as part of the system-level schedule milestones
reflected in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.
SAR Baseline
Development
Estimate
N/A
Current APB
Development
Objective/Threshold
N/A
N/A
Current
Estimate
N/A
UNCLASSIFIED
15
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0016.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Performance
F-35 Aircraft
Performance Characteristics
SAR Baseline
Development
Estimate
With four 1000# JDAMs
and two internal AIM-120s,
full expendables, execute
a 600 foot (450 UK
STOVL) STO from LHA,
LHD, and aircraft carriers
(sea level, tropical day, 10
kts operational WOD) and
with a combat radius of
550 nm (STOVL profile).
Also must perform STOVL
vertical landing with two
1000# JDAMs and two
internal AIM-120s, full
expendables, and fuel to
fly the STOVL Recovery
profile.
Current APB
Development
Objective/Threshold
With four 1000# JDAMs
and two internal AIM-
120s, full expendables,
execute a 600 foot (450
UK STOVL) STO from
LHA, LHD, and aircraft
carriers (sea level,
tropical day, 10 kts
operational WOD) and
with a combat radius of
550 nm (STOVL profile).
Also must perform
STOVL vertical landing
with two 1000# JDAMs
and two internal AIM-
120s, full expendables,
and fuel to fly the STOVL
Recovery profile.
690
550
730
98%
98%
98%
Demonstrated
Performance
Current
Estimate
STOVL Mission Performance - STO Distance Flat Deck
With two 1000# JDAMs TBD
and two internal AIM-
120s, full expendables,
execute a 600 foot (450
UK STOVL) STO from
LHA, LHD, and aircraft
carriers (sea level,
tropical day, 10 kts
operational WOD) and
with a combat radius of
450 nm (STOVL profile).
Also must perform
STOVL vertical landing
with two 1000# JDAMs
and two internal AIM-
120s, full expendables,
and fuel to fly the STOVL
Recovery profile.
590
450
600
93%
95%
95%
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Execute 558
ft. STO with 2
JDAM
(internal), 2
AIM-120
(internal), fuel
to fly 467nm
(Ch-1)
Combat Radius NM -CTOL Variant
690
550
730
98%
98%
98%
625
467
630
97%
98%
98%
Less than or
equal to 8 C-
17
equivalents
(Ch-2)
(Ch-1)
Combat Radius NM -STOVL Variant
(Ch-1)
Combat Radius NM -CV Variant
(Ch-1)
Mission Reliability - CTOL Variant
Mission Reliability - CV Variant
Mission Reliability - STOVL Variant
Logistics Footprint - CTOL Variant
Less than or equal to 6 C- Less than or equal to 6 C Less than or equal to 8 C TBD
17 equivalents
-17 equivalents
-17 equivalent loads
UNCLASSIFIED
16
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0017.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Logistics Footprint - CV Variant
Less than or equal to
34,000 cu ft., 183 ST
Less than or equal to
34,000 cu ft., 183 ST
Less than or equal to
46,000 cu ft., 243 ST
TBD
Less than or
equal to
38,800 cu ft.,
217 ST
Less than or
equal to 7 C-
17
equivalents
Less than or
equal to
17,400 cu ft,
100 ST
3.4/3.0/2.0
2.5 ASD
3.0/3.0/1.0
1.8 ASD
5.2/4.0/2.0
1.1 ASD
Vpa.
Maximum
approach
speed (Vpa)
at required
carrier
landing
weight
(RCLW) of
less than 144
knots.
(Ch-2)
Logistics Footprint - STOVL Variant
Less than or equal to 4 C- Less than or equal to 4 C Less than or equal to 8 C TBD
17 equivalents
-17 equivalents
-17 equivalent loads
(Ch-2)
Logistics Footprint - STOVL Variant L-Class
Less than or equal to
15,000 cu ft, 104 ST
Less than or equal to
15,000 cu ft, 104 ST
Less than or equal to
21,000 cu ft, 136 ST
TBD
(Ch-2)
Sortie Generation Rates - CTOL Variant
4.0/3.0/2.0 2.5 ASD
4.0/3.0/2.0 2.5 ASD
3.0/2.0/1.0 2.5 ASD
TBD
(Ch-2)
Sortie Generation Rates - CV Variant
4.0/3.0/1.0 1.8 ASD
4.0/3.0/1.0 1.8 ASD
3.0/2.0/1.0 1.8 ASD
TBD
(Ch-2)
Sortie Generation Rates - STOVL Variant (USMC)
6.0/4.0/2.0 1.1 ASD
6.0/4.0/2.0 1.1 ASD
4.0/3.0/1.0 1.1 ASD
TBD
(Ch-2)
CV Recovery Performance (Vpa)
Vpa. Maximum approach
speed (Vpa) at required
carrier landing weight
(RCLW) of less than 140
knots.
Vpa at required carrier
landing weight (RCLW)
of less than 140 knots.
Vpa at required carrier
landing weight (RCLW)
of less than 145 knots.
TBD
Classified Performance information is provided in the classified annex to this submission.
Requirements Reference
Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Change 3 dated August 19, 2008 as modified by Joint Requirements
Oversight Council Memorandum 040-12 dated March 16, 2012
UNCLASSIFIED
17
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0018.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Change Explanations
(Ch-1) Performance characteristic current estimate updated to reflect a change in the Combat Radius and STOVL Mission
Performance characteristics. Fuel use margin was reduced from 4% to 3% based on refined understanding of drag and
installed propulsion performance. Program anticipates further margin reduction and concomitant performance
improvements as flight test draws to a conclusion over the next 18 months.
(Ch-2) The PEO completed the initial portion of a more comprehensive and accurate assessment of the SGR and Log
Footprint KPPs. This update more accurately reflects the capability of the design when operated in accordance with current
fleet policies and procedures. This differs from the prior, contractual analysis by capturing the demonstrated and predicted
performance of the air system design (vice modeled) and adding operationally representative fleet policies and procedures
(in the SGR case).
Notes
The F-35 Program is currently in developmental testing, and will provide demonstrated performance with the Block 3F full
capability aircraft.
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ASD - Average Sortie Duration
CTOL - Conventional Takeoff and Landing
CU FT - Cubic Feet
CV - Aircraft Carrier Suitable Variant
JDAM - Joint Direct Attack Munitions
KTS - Knots
NM - Nautical Miles
RCLW - Required Carrier Landing Weight
SGR - Sortie Generation Rate
ST - Short Tons
STO - Short Takeoff
STOVL - Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing
Vpa - Max Approach Speed
WOD - Wind Over the Deck
UNCLASSIFIED
18
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0019.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
F-35 Engine
Performance Characteristics
SAR Baseline
Development
Estimate
See Note
N/A
Requirements Reference
Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Change 3 dated August 19, 2008 as modified by Joint Requirements
Oversight Council Memorandum 040-12 dated March 16, 2012
N/A
N/A
TBD
N/A
Current APB
Development
Objective/Threshold
Demonstrated
Performance
Current
Estimate
Change Explanations
None
Notes
Performance characteristics for the F-35 Engine subprogram are captured as part of the system-level performance
characteristics reflected in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.
UNCLASSIFIED
19
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0020.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Track to Budget
F-35 Aircraft
General Notes
F-35 is DoD's largest cooperative development program. In addition to DoD's funding lines, eight International Partners are
providing funding in the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) Phase under a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU): United Kingdom, Italy, The Netherlands, Turkey, Canada, Australia, Denmark, and Norway. All but Turkey and
Australia were partners in the prior phase. Associated financial contributions are reflected in the Annual Funding section
as Appropriation 9999, RDT&E Non-Treasury Funds. RDT&E cost excludes Follow-on Modernization Funding: F-35A/B/C
Follow-on Development (FOD); F-35B/C Sustainment/Capability Enhancements; F-35A Deployability and Suitability
Enhancements; and F-35A Dual Capable Aircraft Enhancements.
RDT&E
Appn
Navy
BA
1319
04
Project
2209
1319
05
Project
2262
1319
05
Project
2261
3194
Air Force
3600
04
Project
2025
3600
05
Project
PE
0603800N
Name
RDT&E, Navy CDP
0604800M
Name
Joint Strike Fighter - EMD
0604800N
Name
JT Strike Fighter - EMD
RDT&E, Navy EMD/Joint Reprogramming
Center
0603800F
Name
RDT&E, Air Force CDP
0604800F
Name
F-35 - EMD
0603800E
Name
RDT&E, DARPA
Procurement
Appn
Navy
BA
PE
Name
(Sunk)
(Sunk)
(Sunk)
Navy
Navy
(Sunk)
Air Force
3831
Defense-Wide 0400
03
Project
1506
01 0204146N
Line Item
Navy
0147
Joint Strike Fighter CV
1506
01 0204146M
Line Item
Name
UNCLASSIFIED
20
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0021.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Navy
0152
JSF STOVL
1506
05 0204146M
Line Item
0592
F-35 STOVL Series
1506
05 0204146N
Line Item
0593
F-35 CV Series
1506
06 0204146M
Line Item
Name
Navy
Name
Navy
Name
(Shared)
Navy
0605
Spares and Repair Parts
1506
06 0204146N
Line Item
Name
0605
Spares and Repair Parts
3010
06 0207142F
Line Item
Name
000999
Initial Spares/Repair Parts
3010
01 0207142F
Line Item
Name
ATA000
F-35
3010
05 0207142F
Line Item
F03500
F-35 Modifications
BA
1205
01
Project
1205
01
Project
1205
01
Project
3300
01
Project
3300
01
Project
3300
01
Project
PE
0212576N
Name
MILCON, USN
0216496M
Name
MILCON, USN
0816376N
Name
MILCON, USN
0052635F
Name
MILCON, AF
0207142F
Name
MILCON, AF
0207597F
Name
MILCON, AF
(Shared)
Air Force
(Shared)
Air Force
Air Force
Name
MILCON
Appn
Navy
(Shared)
Navy
(Shared)
Navy
(Shared) (Sunk)
Air Force
(Shared)
Air Force
(Shared)
Air Force
(Shared)
UNCLASSIFIED
21
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0022.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
F-35 Engine
General Notes
F-35 is DoD's largest cooperative development program. In addition to DoD's funding lines, eight International Partners are
providing funding in the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) Phase under a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU): United Kingdom, Italy, The Netherlands, Turkey, Canada, Australia, Denmark, and Norway. All but Turkey and
Australia were partners in the prior phase. Associated financial contributions are reflected in the Annual Funding section
as Appropriation 9999, RDT&E Non-Treasury Funds. RDT&E cost excludes Follow-on Modernization funding: F-35A/B/C
Follow-on Development (FOD); F-35B/C Sustainment/Capability Enhancements; F-35A Deployability and Suitability
Enhancements; and F-35A Dual Capable Aircraft Enhancements.
RDT&E
Appn
Navy
BA
1319
04
Project
2209
1319
05
Project
2262
1319
05
Project
2261
3194
9999
3600
04
Project
2025
3600
05
Project
3831
Defense-Wide 0400
03
Project
PE
0603800N
Name
RDT&E, Navy CDP
0604800M
Name
RDT&E, Marine Corps
0604800N
Name
RDT&E, Navy EMD/JSF
RDT&E, Navy EMD/Joint Reprogramming
Center
RDT&E, Navy EMD/Congressional Adds
0603800F
Name
RDT&E, Air Force CDP
0604800F
Name
RDT&E, Air Force EMD/Joint Strike Fighter
Quantity of RDT&E Articles
0603800E
Name
RDT&E, DARPA
Procurement
Appn
Navy
BA
PE
Name
(Sunk)
(Sunk)
(Sunk)
(Sunk)
Navy
Navy
Air Force
(Sunk)
Air Force
1506
01 0204146N
Line Item
0147
JSF (Navy)
1506
01 0204146M
Line Item
0152
JSF (Marine Corps)
Navy
Name
UNCLASSIFIED
22
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0023.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Navy
1506
06 0204146M
Line Item
Name
(Shared)
Navy
0605
Initial Spares (Marine Corps)
1506
06 0204146N
Line Item
Name
0605
Initial Spares (Navy)
3010
06 0207142F
Line Item
(Shared)
Name
(Shared)
Air Force
Air Force
000999
Initial Spares (Air Force)
3010
01 0207142F
Line Item
Name
ATA000
JSF (Air Force)
3010
05 0207142F
Line Item
F03500
Mods (Air Force)
Air Force
Name
UNCLASSIFIED
23
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0024.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost and Funding
Cost Summary - Total Program
Total Acquisition Cost - Total Program
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
Appropriation
SAR Baseline
Current APB
Development
Development
Estimate
Objective/Threshold
59677.3
266665.8
--
--
--
--
--
--
4168.0
0.0
330511.1
59398.1
266665.8
--
--
--
--
--
--
4168.0
0.0
330231.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
N/A
Current
Estimate
59491.2
249667.8
222668.7
197002.0
25666.7
26999.1
16223.6
10775.5
4101.4
0.0
313260.4
TY $M
SAR Baseline Current APB
Current
Development Development
Estimate
Estimate
Objective
55233.8
335680.7
--
--
--
--
--
--
4797.3
0.0
395711.8
55182.9
335680.7
--
--
--
--
--
--
4797.3
0.0
395660.9
55133.0
319115.7
286951.9
255294.7
31657.2
32163.8
19225.3
12938.5
4793.3
0.0
379042.0
RDT&E
Procurement
Flyaway
Recurring
Non Recurring
Support
Other Support
Initial Spares
MILCON
Acq O&M
Total
UNCLASSIFIED
24
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0025.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost and Funding
Cost Summary - F-35 Aircraft
Total Acquisition Cost - F-35 Aircraft
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
Appropriation
SAR Baseline
Current APB
Development
Development
Estimate
Objective/Threshold
47982.1
224332.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
4168.0
0.0
276483.0
46457.5
224332.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
4168.0
0.0
274958.4
51103.3
246766.2
--
--
--
--
--
--
4584.8
0.0
N/A
Current
Estimate
46368.6
211290.9
189120.8
166222.4
22898.4
22170.1
14549.0
7621.1
4101.4
0.0
261760.9
TY $M
SAR Baseline Current APB
Current
Development Development
Estimate
Estimate
Objective
44410.1
282647.8
--
--
--
--
--
--
4797.3
0.0
331855.2
43360.7
282647.8
--
--
--
--
--
--
4797.3
0.0
330805.8
43170.1
270427.5
244057.7
215735.2
28322.5
26369.8
17248.4
9121.4
4793.3
0.0
318390.9
RDT&E
Procurement
Flyaway
Recurring
Non Recurring
Support
Other Support
Initial Spares
MILCON
Acq O&M
Total
Current APB Cost Estimate Reference
Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) dated March 09, 2012
Confidence Level
Confidence Level of cost estimate for current APB: 50%
This estimate, like all previous Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG) and Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
(CAPE) estimates, is built upon a product-oriented work breakdown structure; is based on historical actual cost
information to the maximum extent possible; and, most importantly, is based on conservative assumptions that are
consistent with actual demonstrated contractor and government performance for a series of acquisition programs in which
the Department has been successful.
It is difficult to calculate mathematically the precise confidence levels associated with life-cycle cost estimates prepared
for Major Defense Acquisition program (MDAPs). Based on the rigor in methods used in building estimates, the strong
adherence to the collection and use of historical cost information, and the review of applied assumptions, we project that it
is about equally likely that the estimates will prove too low or too high for execution of the program described.
UNCLASSIFIED
25
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0026.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Quantity
RDT&E
Procurement
Total
Total Quantity - F-35 Aircraft
SAR Baseline
Current APB
Development
Development
Estimate
14
2443
2457
14
2443
2457
Current Estimate
14
2443
2457
UNCLASSIFIED
26
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0027.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost Summary - F-35 Engine
Total Acquisition Cost - F-35 Engine
BY 2012 $M
BY 2012 $M
Appropriation
SAR Baseline
Current APB
Development
Development
Estimate
Objective/Threshold
11695.2
42332.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0
0.0
54028.1
12940.6
42332.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0
0.0
55273.5
14234.7
46566.2
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0
0.0
N/A
Current
Estimate
13122.6
38376.9
33547.9
30779.6
2768.3
4829.0
1674.6
3154.4
0.0
0.0
51499.5
TY $M
SAR Baseline Current APB
Current
Development Development
Estimate
Estimate
Objective
10823.7
53032.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0
0.0
63856.6
11822.2
53032.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0
0.0
64855.1
11962.9
48688.2
42894.2
39559.5
3334.7
5794.0
1976.9
3817.1
0.0
0.0
60651.1
RDT&E
Procurement
Flyaway
Recurring
Non Recurring
Support
Other Support
Initial Spares
MILCON
Acq O&M
Total
Current APB Cost Estimate Reference
Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (CAPE) Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) dated March 09, 2012
Confidence Level
Confidence Level of cost estimate for current APB: 50%
This estimate, like all previous Cost Analysis Improvement Group (CAIG) and Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
(CAPE) estimates, is built upon a product-oriented work breakdown structure; is based on historical actual cost
information to the maximum extent possible; and, most importantly, is based on conservative assumptions that are
consistent with actual demonstrated contractor and government performance for a series of acquisition programs in which
the Department has been successful.
It is difficult to calculate mathematically the precise confidence levels associated with life-cycle cost estimates prepared
for Major Defense Acquisition program (MDAPs). Based on the rigor in methods used in building estimates, the strong
adherence to the collection and use of historical cost information, and the review of applied assumptions, we project that it
is about equally likely that the estimates will prove too low or too high for execution of the program described.
Quantity
RDT&E
Procurement
Total
Total Quantity - F-35 Engine
SAR Baseline
Current APB
Development
Development
Estimate
14
2443
2457
14
2443
2457
Current Estimate
14
2443
2457
UNCLASSIFIED
27
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0028.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost and Funding
Funding Summary - Total Program
Appropriation Summary
FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)
Appropriation
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
PB 2017 Total
PB 2016 Total
Delta
Prior
51881.1
46173.0
1489.6
0.0
99543.7
99532.9
10.8
FY 2016
1506.2
9876.8
292.7
0.0
11675.7
10959.5
716.2
FY 2017
1436.9
8703.0
571.7
0.0
10711.6
11586.7
-875.1
FY 2018
273.3
10593.3
165.7
0.0
11032.3
12093.5
-1061.2
FY 2019
14.9
10402.1
183.5
0.0
10600.5
12034.6
-1434.1
FY 2020
11.2
11278.6
135.7
0.0
11425.5
11906.9
-481.4
FY 2021
9.4
13107.0
116.2
0.0
13232.6
12358.6
874.0
To
Complete
Total
0.0 55133.0
208981.9 319115.7
1838.2
4793.3
0.0
0.0
210820.1 379042.0
220662.0 391134.7
-9841.9 -12092.7
UNCLASSIFIED
28
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0029.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost and Funding
Funding Summary - F-35 Aircraft
Appropriation Summary
FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)
Appropriation
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
PB 2017 Total
PB 2016 Total
Delta
Prior
40174.4
39405.5
1489.6
0.0
81069.5
81040.1
29.4
FY 2016
1306.6
8625.9
292.7
0.0
10225.2
9508.6
716.6
FY 2017
1380.3
7194.4
571.7
0.0
9146.4
10072.4
-926.0
FY 2018
273.3
8784.0
165.7
0.0
9223.0
10305.4
-1082.4
FY 2019
14.9
8627.7
183.5
0.0
8826.1
10076.7
-1250.6
FY 2020
11.2
9366.7
135.7
0.0
9513.6
9893.0
-379.4
FY 2021
9.4
10866.2
116.2
0.0
10991.8
10216.9
774.9
To
Complete
Total
0.0 43170.1
177557.1 270427.5
1838.2
4793.3
0.0
0.0
179395.3 318390.9
183008.2 324121.3
-3612.9
-5730.4
Quantity Summary
FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)
Quantity
Development
Production
PB 2017 Total
PB 2016 Total
Delta
Undistributed
14
0
14
14
0
Prior
0
217
217
217
0
FY
2016
0
68
68
57
11
FY
2017
0
63
63
66
-3
FY
2018
0
70
70
88
-18
FY
2019
0
80
80
90
-10
FY
2020
0
86
86
92
-6
FY
2021
0
105
105
100
5
To
Complete
0
1754
1754
1733
21
Total
14
2443
2457
2457
0
UNCLASSIFIED
29
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0030.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Funding Summary - F-35 Engine
Appropriation Summary
FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)
Appropriation
RDT&E
Procurement
MILCON
Acq O&M
PB 2017 Total
PB 2016 Total
Delta
Prior
11706.7
6767.5
0.0
0.0
18474.2
18492.8
-18.6
FY 2016
199.6
1250.9
0.0
0.0
1450.5
1450.9
-0.4
FY 2017
56.6
1508.6
0.0
0.0
1565.2
1514.3
50.9
FY 2018
0.0
1809.3
0.0
0.0
1809.3
1788.1
21.2
FY 2019
0.0
1774.4
0.0
0.0
1774.4
1957.9
-183.5
FY 2020
0.0
1911.9
0.0
0.0
1911.9
2013.9
-102.0
FY 2021
0.0
2240.8
0.0
0.0
2240.8
2141.7
99.1
To
Complete
0.0
31424.8
0.0
0.0
31424.8
37653.8
-6229.0
Total
11962.9
48688.2
0.0
0.0
60651.1
67013.4
-6362.3
Quantity Summary
FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)
Quantity
Development
Production
PB 2017 Total
PB 2016 Total
Delta
Undistributed
14
0
14
14
0
Prior
0
217
217
217
0
FY
2016
0
68
68
57
11
FY
2017
0
63
63
66
-3
FY
2018
0
70
70
88
-18
FY
2019
0
80
80
90
-10
FY
2020
0
86
86
92
-6
FY
2021
0
105
105
100
5
To
Complete
0
1754
1754
1733
21
Total
14
2443
2457
2457
0
UNCLASSIFIED
30
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0031.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost and Funding
Annual Funding By Appropriation - F-35 Aircraft
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
23.2
54.8
16.9
94.9
1996
1997
1998
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
31
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0032.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
30.1
70.2
21.5
121.8
1996
1997
1998
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
32
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0033.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
67.5
65.4
202.3
357.2
366.5
200.3
274.3
302.6
1210.1
1584.1
1465.8
1678.6
1632.4
1359.0
1197.5
1567.4
715.4
1262.2
972.1
553.6
479.8
457.1
389.0
113.6
5.3
5.4
5.5
18490.0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
33
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0034.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
89.1
84.9
259.5
454.5
460.9
248.3
335.4
366.3
1443.6
1838.4
1657.5
1840.8
1747.3
1428.6
1242.9
1602.8
714.5
1240.0
945.1
530.7
454.2
425.8
355.9
101.9
4.7
4.7
4.7
19883.0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
34
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0035.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
23.7
78.7
64.6
195.6
360.4
378.9
191.7
274.3
366.8
1090.1
1548.2
1510.3
1657.3
1470.7
1285.0
1271.2
1440.5
987.9
960.1
1081.5
683.6
773.2
832.5
969.3
132.2
9.6
5.8
3.9
19647.6
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
35
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0036.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
31.9
103.9
83.9
250.9
458.6
476.5
237.6
335.4
444.0
1300.4
1796.8
1707.8
1817.4
1574.3
1350.8
1319.4
1473.0
986.6
943.2
1051.5
655.3
731.9
775.5
886.7
118.6
8.4
5.0
3.3
20928.6
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
36
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0037.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
11.3
67.1
72.1
49.0
25.2
9.5
255.8
298.7
486.7
734.8
801.3
635.4
574.0
236.0
133.2
171.3
124.2
148.5
22.0
15.0
17.0
22.0
27.5
4937.6
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
37
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0038.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
14.7
86.1
91.7
61.6
31.2
11.6
309.6
356.3
564.8
830.9
878.7
680.1
603.4
244.9
136.2
171.1
122.0
144.4
21.1
14.2
15.8
20.1
24.7
5435.2
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
38
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0039.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
107.6
428.5
983.1
1009.2
1471.2
2751.2
2041.5
2074.6
2034.6
2715.8
4076.0
3339.3
3584.0
3247.9
3473.2
4300.8
6091.5
5332.8
5462.0
6101.5
6961.8
6472.7
5901.4
5990.1
6622.5
7570.5
7465.0
6998.0
7179.5
7878.9
8035.0
8150.0
6604.9
152456.6
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
80.8
172.3
277.6
355.7
569.1
375.7
76.6
617.8
625.0
561.5
649.7
1070.4
1079.3
886.9
709.3
640.6
609.7
620.7
634.5
647.4
598.4
607.9
616.6
634.0
649.8
676.1
694.7
698.4
711.8
722.5
676.7
552.2
19099.7
Total
Flyaway
107.6
509.3
1155.4
1286.8
1826.9
3320.3
2417.2
2151.2
2652.4
3340.8
4637.5
3989.0
4654.4
4327.2
4360.1
5010.1
6732.1
5942.5
6082.7
6736.0
7609.2
7071.1
6509.3
6606.7
7256.5
8220.3
8141.1
7692.7
7877.9
8590.7
8757.5
8826.7
7157.1
171556.3
Total
Support
--
91.1
131.5
175.8
277.7
679.6
773.0
528.9
433.0
605.0
626.3
488.5
559.4
566.2
638.0
802.1
748.4
648.7
717.2
605.3
818.1
648.5
599.3
487.4
547.0
699.2
645.3
571.2
75.3
32.9
29.1
20.7
6.2
15275.9
Total
Program
107.6
600.4
1286.9
1462.6
2104.6
3999.9
3190.2
2680.1
3085.4
3945.8
5263.8
4477.5
5213.8
4893.4
4998.1
5812.2
7480.5
6591.2
6799.9
7341.3
8427.3
7719.6
7108.6
7094.1
7803.5
8919.5
8786.4
8263.9
7953.2
8623.6
8786.6
8847.4
7163.3
186832.2
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
Subtotal
--
2
6
7
10
22
18
19
19
28
47
43
44
48
48
60
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
62
1763
UNCLASSIFIED
39
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0040.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
116.8
452.5
1022.9
1035.7
1478.8
2711.7
1983.8
1994.5
1930.9
2539.2
3746.2
3011.8
3170.3
2816.6
2953.0
3584.9
4978.0
4272.5
4290.2
4698.6
5255.9
4790.9
4282.4
4261.5
4619.0
5176.7
5004.5
4599.4
4626.2
4935.2
4934.3
4906.7
3898.5
114080.1
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
85.4
179.3
284.7
357.6
561.0
365.1
73.6
586.3
584.4
516.1
586.0
946.7
936.1
754.1
591.2
523.5
488.5
487.6
488.6
488.7
442.9
441.2
438.6
442.2
444.3
453.2
456.6
450.0
445.8
443.6
407.4
325.9
15076.2
Total
Flyaway
116.8
537.9
1202.2
1320.4
1836.4
3272.7
2348.9
2068.1
2517.2
3123.6
4262.3
3597.8
4117.0
3752.7
3707.1
4176.1
5501.5
4761.0
4777.8
5187.2
5744.6
5233.8
4723.6
4700.1
5061.2
5621.0
5457.7
5056.0
5076.2
5381.0
5377.9
5314.1
4224.4
129156.3
Total
Support
--
96.2
136.8
180.5
279.1
669.8
751.1
508.5
411.0
565.6
575.6
440.6
494.9
491.0
542.4
668.6
611.6
519.7
563.3
466.1
617.7
480.0
434.8
346.8
381.5
478.1
432.6
375.4
48.5
20.6
17.9
12.5
3.7
12622.5
Total
Program
116.8
634.1
1339.0
1500.9
2115.5
3942.5
3100.0
2576.6
2928.2
3689.2
4837.9
4038.4
4611.9
4243.7
4249.5
4844.7
6113.1
5280.7
5341.1
5653.3
6362.3
5713.8
5158.4
5046.9
5442.7
6099.1
5890.3
5431.4
5124.7
5401.6
5395.8
5326.6
4228.1
141778.8
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
Subtotal
--
2
6
7
10
22
18
19
19
28
47
43
44
48
48
60
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
62
1763
UNCLASSIFIED
40
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0041.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Aircraft
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
End Item
Recurring
Fiscal
Flyaway
Quantity
Year
(Aligned With
Quantity)
BY 2012 $M
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
Subtotal
--
2
6
7
10
22
18
19
19
28
47
43
44
48
48
60
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
62
1763
--
452.5
1022.9
1035.7
1478.8
2711.7
1983.8
1994.5
1930.9
2539.2
3746.2
3011.8
3170.3
2816.6
2953.0
3584.9
4978.0
4272.5
4290.2
4698.6
5255.9
4790.9
4282.4
4261.5
4619.0
5176.7
5004.5
4599.4
4626.2
4935.2
4934.3
4906.7
4015.3
114080.1
UNCLASSIFIED
41
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0042.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
96.9
923.2
1062.0
2681.2
1494.8
1477.7
1107.3
1205.5
1115.0
2130.3
1867.2
2555.1
2648.5
3242.8
3731.8
4015.2
3511.2
3566.7
3896.6
4396.8
4131.9
3834.2
3721.1
2685.4
2180.2
63278.6
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
38.6
182.0
305.4
251.0
330.2
44.1
406.3
650.9
601.9
422.9
668.2
603.2
501.5
535.4
396.9
377.5
368.0
377.9
381.4
358.6
364.0
356.9
373.5
326.5
9222.8
Total
Flyaway
96.9
961.8
1244.0
2986.6
1745.8
1807.9
1151.4
1611.8
1765.9
2732.2
2290.1
3223.3
3251.7
3744.3
4267.2
4412.1
3888.7
3934.7
4274.5
4778.2
4490.5
4198.2
4078.0
3058.9
2506.7
72501.4
Total
Support
--
10.7
206.1
560.9
431.8
746.7
557.3
642.3
414.1
629.9
426.8
346.9
482.6
624.3
786.8
644.6
533.7
490.6
400.8
441.8
335.6
369.0
260.7
388.6
361.3
11093.9
Total
Program
96.9
972.5
1450.1
3547.5
2177.6
2554.6
1708.7
2254.1
2180.0
3362.1
2716.9
3570.2
3734.3
4368.6
5054.0
5056.7
4422.4
4425.3
4675.3
5220.0
4826.1
4567.2
4338.7
3447.5
2868.0
83595.3
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
Subtotal
--
6
7
20
10
13
10
10
10
21
20
26
32
38
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
28
24
680
UNCLASSIFIED
42
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0043.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
102.3
960.6
1089.8
2695.1
1473.3
1435.9
1064.5
1144.1
1042.5
1957.9
1684.1
2260.2
2296.8
2757.1
3110.6
3281.2
2813.1
2801.5
3000.6
3319.4
3058.3
2782.3
2647.3
1873.0
1490.8
52142.3
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
40.2
186.8
307.0
247.4
320.9
42.4
385.6
608.5
553.2
381.4
591.0
523.2
426.4
446.3
324.3
302.4
289.1
291.1
287.9
265.4
264.2
253.8
260.4
223.3
7822.2
Total
Flyaway
102.3
1000.8
1276.6
3002.1
1720.7
1756.8
1106.9
1529.7
1651.0
2511.1
2065.5
2851.2
2820.0
3183.5
3556.9
3605.5
3115.5
3090.6
3291.7
3607.3
3323.7
3046.5
2901.1
2133.4
1714.1
59964.5
Total
Support
--
11.1
211.5
563.8
425.6
725.6
535.8
609.5
387.2
578.9
385.0
306.9
418.5
530.8
655.8
526.8
427.6
385.3
308.6
333.6
248.4
267.7
185.5
271.1
247.0
9547.6
Total
Program
102.3
1011.9
1488.1
3565.9
2146.3
2482.4
1642.7
2139.2
2038.2
3090.0
2450.5
3158.1
3238.5
3714.3
4212.7
4132.3
3543.1
3475.9
3600.3
3940.9
3572.1
3314.2
3086.6
2404.5
1961.1
69512.1
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
Subtotal
--
6
7
20
10
13
10
10
10
21
20
26
32
38
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
28
24
680
UNCLASSIFIED
43
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0044.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Aircraft
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
End Item
Recurring
Fiscal
Flyaway
Quantity
Year
(Aligned With
Quantity)
BY 2012 $M
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
Subtotal
--
6
7
20
10
13
10
10
10
21
20
26
32
38
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
28
24
680
--
960.6
1089.8
2695.1
1473.3
1435.9
1064.5
1144.1
1042.5
1957.9
1684.1
2260.2
2296.8
2757.1
3110.6
3281.2
2813.1
2801.5
3000.6
3319.4
3058.3
2782.3
2647.3
1873.0
1593.1
52142.3
UNCLASSIFIED
44
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0045.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
1205 | MILCON | Military Construction, Navy and Marine
Corps
TY $M
Fiscal
Total
Year
Program
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
Subtotal
24.4
--
0.1
--
0.2
0.7
34.1
377.9
172.2
94.9
--
131.9
94.4
230.9
64.7
122.0
119.8
116.2
75.9
101.3
145.0
--
61.9
75.0
65.1
2.0
2110.6
UNCLASSIFIED
45
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0046.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
1205 | MILCON | Military Construction, Navy and Marine
Corps
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Total
Year
Program
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
Subtotal
27.8
--
0.1
--
0.2
0.7
34.1
369.3
165.9
90.2
--
121.5
85.4
204.9
56.3
104.0
100.2
95.2
61.0
79.8
112.0
--
46.0
54.6
46.5
1.4
1857.1
UNCLASSIFIED
46
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0047.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
All DoN MILCON funding is reflected in the Aircraft subprogram.
UNCLASSIFIED
47
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0048.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air Force
TY $M
Fiscal
Total
Year
Program
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Subtotal
1.7
10.0
--
--
100.3
116.0
125.1
139.6
24.3
13.5
56.0
66.7
198.3
340.8
101.0
61.5
15.9
--
123.7
167.0
142.3
122.1
118.4
129.9
101.8
102.7
94.6
71.7
71.2
37.5
24.8
4.3
2682.7
UNCLASSIFIED
48
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0049.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Aircraft
3300 | MILCON | Military Construction, Air Force
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Total
Year
Program
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
Subtotal
1.9
11.1
--
--
104.1
118.8
125.0
136.4
23.4
12.8
52.5
61.5
179.4
302.4
87.9
52.4
13.3
--
99.4
131.6
109.9
92.5
87.9
94.5
72.6
71.8
64.4
47.9
46.6
24.0
15.6
2.7
2244.3
UNCLASSIFIED
49
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0050.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
All Air Force F-35 MILCON funding is reflected in the Aircraft subprogram.
UNCLASSIFIED
50
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0051.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding By Appropriation - F-35 Engine
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
16.4
15.9
49.3
87.1
89.4
48.8
66.9
409.8
400.5
435.8
614.3
586.3
441.6
596.0
544.6
466.1
216.2
101.8
143.6
52.0
54.5
58.4
14.5
5509.8
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
51
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0052.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
3600 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Air Force
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
5
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
21.7
20.6
63.2
110.8
112.4
60.5
81.8
496.0
477.8
505.8
694.7
643.0
472.7
626.5
565.2
476.6
215.9
100.0
139.6
49.8
51.6
54.4
13.3
6053.9
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
52
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0053.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
5.8
19.3
15.8
47.7
87.8
92.4
46.7
66.9
350.4
550.8
533.2
573.5
528.1
639.1
563.9
433.1
445.7
252.9
187.6
199.2
116.1
173.7
141.2
42.1
6113.0
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
53
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0054.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
7.8
25.5
20.5
61.2
111.7
116.2
57.9
81.8
424.1
657.1
618.8
648.5
579.1
684.1
592.8
449.5
455.8
252.6
184.3
193.7
111.3
164.4
131.5
38.5
6668.7
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
54
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0055.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
5.7
13.4
4.0
23.1
1994
1995
1996
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
55
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0056.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
0400 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Defense-Wide
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
7.7
17.7
5.2
30.6
1994
1995
1996
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
56
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0057.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
2.7
3.9
5.1
5.7
1.8
0.5
43.3
124.3
54.1
0.3
--
75.0
--
--
--
--
--
0.3
317.0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
57
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0058.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
9999 | RDT&E | Non Treasury Funds
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Support
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Total
Program
3.5
5.0
6.5
7.2
2.2
0.6
52.4
148.3
62.8
0.3
--
80.3
--
--
--
--
--
0.3
369.4
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Subtotal
UNCLASSIFIED
58
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0059.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
9.8
47.5
123.6
127.0
176.7
353.2
275.3
262.5
282.1
386.7
606.1
606.7
651.2
590.1
631.1
781.4
1066.3
976.1
997.2
1094.6
1123.6
1068.0
977.9
996.6
1091.1
1237.8
1185.7
1090.4
1110.8
1219.4
1241.5
1243.9
902.2
24534.1
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
6.9
35.0
63.9
72.6
91.6
65.7
11.9
31.2
15.5
23.2
48.9
80.6
81.2
66.8
53.4
48.2
45.9
46.7
47.8
48.7
45.0
45.8
46.4
47.7
48.9
50.9
52.3
52.6
53.6
54.4
50.9
41.6
1575.8
Total
Flyaway
9.8
54.4
158.6
190.9
249.3
444.8
341.0
274.4
313.3
402.2
629.3
655.6
731.8
671.3
697.9
834.8
1114.5
1022.0
1043.9
1142.4
1172.3
1113.0
1023.7
1043.0
1138.8
1286.7
1236.6
1142.7
1163.4
1273.0
1295.9
1294.8
943.8
26109.9
Total
Support
--
27.7
30.9
33.3
59.1
136.6
123.0
89.6
47.5
116.2
126.7
116.7
135.8
145.4
153.6
172.1
178.5
189.3
177.6
184.4
218.3
135.7
130.3
119.0
122.4
153.9
143.0
137.1
18.8
3.7
3.2
2.3
0.5
3432.2
Total
Program
9.8
82.1
189.5
224.2
308.4
581.4
464.0
364.0
360.8
518.4
756.0
772.3
867.6
816.7
851.5
1006.9
1293.0
1211.3
1221.5
1326.8
1390.6
1248.7
1154.0
1162.0
1261.2
1440.6
1379.6
1279.8
1182.2
1276.7
1299.1
1297.1
944.3
29542.1
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
Subtotal
--
2
6
7
10
22
18
19
19
28
47
43
44
48
48
60
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
62
1763
UNCLASSIFIED
59
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0060.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
10.6
50.2
128.6
130.3
177.6
348.1
267.5
252.4
267.7
361.6
557.1
547.2
576.0
511.7
536.6
651.3
871.4
782.0
783.3
842.9
848.3
790.5
709.6
709.0
761.0
846.4
794.9
716.7
715.8
763.8
762.4
748.9
532.5
18353.9
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
7.3
36.4
65.6
73.0
90.3
63.8
11.4
29.6
14.5
21.3
44.1
71.3
70.4
56.8
44.5
39.4
36.8
36.7
36.8
36.8
33.3
33.2
33.0
33.3
33.4
34.1
34.4
33.9
33.6
33.4
30.6
24.6
1277.6
Total
Flyaway
10.6
57.5
165.0
195.9
250.6
438.4
331.3
263.8
297.3
376.1
578.4
591.3
647.3
582.1
593.4
695.8
910.8
818.8
820.0
879.7
885.1
823.8
742.8
742.0
794.3
879.8
829.0
751.1
749.7
797.4
795.8
779.5
557.1
19631.5
Total
Support
--
29.2
32.2
34.2
59.4
134.7
119.6
86.1
45.1
108.6
116.4
105.3
120.1
126.2
130.6
143.5
145.8
151.7
139.4
142.0
164.8
100.4
94.6
84.7
85.4
105.3
95.9
90.0
12.1
2.3
2.0
1.4
0.3
2809.3
Total
Program
10.6
86.7
197.2
230.1
310.0
573.1
450.9
349.9
342.4
484.7
694.8
696.6
767.4
708.3
724.0
839.3
1056.6
970.5
959.4
1021.7
1049.9
924.2
837.4
826.7
879.7
985.1
924.9
841.1
761.8
799.7
797.8
780.9
557.4
22440.8
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
Subtotal
--
2
6
7
10
22
18
19
19
28
47
43
44
48
48
60
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
62
1763
UNCLASSIFIED
60
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0061.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Engine
3010 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Air Force
End Item
Recurring
Fiscal
Flyaway
Quantity
Year
(Aligned With
Quantity)
BY 2012 $M
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
Subtotal
--
2
6
7
10
22
18
19
19
28
47
43
44
48
48
60
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
62
1763
--
50.2
128.6
130.3
177.6
348.1
267.5
252.4
267.7
361.6
557.1
547.2
576.0
511.7
536.6
651.3
871.4
782.0
783.3
842.9
848.3
790.5
709.6
709.0
761.0
846.4
794.9
716.7
715.8
763.8
762.4
748.9
543.1
18353.9
UNCLASSIFIED
61
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0062.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
TY $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
27.4
246.1
298.0
599.0
400.5
191.4
236.9
227.1
259.5
362.7
568.4
742.3
750.5
840.1
937.1
994.1
910.7
926.6
1012.3
1006.6
970.3
910.7
865.2
442.9
299.0
15025.4
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
1.3
54.3
118.5
112.5
57.7
26.6
21.6
27.6
22.3
87.3
138.0
124.6
103.6
110.6
82.0
76.0
89.5
85.4
89.5
61.5
57.4
60.8
71.8
78.5
1758.9
Total
Flyaway
27.4
247.4
352.3
717.5
513.0
249.1
263.5
248.7
287.1
385.0
655.7
880.3
875.1
943.7
1047.7
1076.1
986.7
1016.1
1097.7
1096.1
1031.8
968.1
926.0
514.7
377.5
16784.3
Total
Support
--
1.2
65.6
127.6
122.3
62.0
169.8
142.4
68.0
109.9
80.6
61.4
82.6
116.7
186.2
117.3
117.0
93.2
93.6
104.3
82.5
90.6
67.5
95.9
103.6
2361.8
Total
Program
27.4
248.6
417.9
845.1
635.3
311.1
433.3
391.1
355.1
494.9
736.3
941.7
957.7
1060.4
1233.9
1193.4
1103.7
1109.3
1191.3
1200.4
1114.3
1058.7
993.5
610.6
481.1
19146.1
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
Subtotal
--
6
7
20
10
13
10
10
10
21
20
26
32
38
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
28
24
680
UNCLASSIFIED
62
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0063.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Annual Funding - F-35 Engine
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
BY 2012 $M
Fiscal
Year
Quantity
End Item
Recurring
Flyaway
28.9
256.1
305.8
602.1
394.8
186.0
227.8
215.5
242.6
333.4
512.7
656.6
650.8
714.3
781.1
812.4
729.6
727.8
779.5
759.9
718.2
660.9
615.5
308.9
204.5
12425.7
Non End
Item
Recurring
Flyaway
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Non
Recurring
Flyaway
--
1.4
55.8
119.2
110.8
56.0
25.6
20.5
25.8
20.5
78.7
122.1
108.1
88.1
92.2
67.0
60.9
70.3
65.8
67.7
45.5
41.7
43.3
50.1
53.6
1490.7
Total
Flyaway
28.9
257.5
361.6
721.3
505.6
242.0
253.4
236.0
268.4
353.9
591.4
778.7
758.9
802.4
873.3
879.4
790.5
798.1
845.3
827.6
763.7
702.6
658.8
359.0
258.1
13916.4
Total
Support
--
1.2
67.3
128.2
120.6
60.3
163.2
135.2
63.6
101.0
72.7
54.3
71.6
99.2
155.2
95.8
93.8
73.2
72.1
78.7
61.1
65.6
48.0
66.9
70.9
2019.7
Total
Program
28.9
258.7
428.9
849.5
626.2
302.3
416.6
371.2
332.0
454.9
664.1
833.0
830.5
901.6
1028.5
975.2
884.3
871.3
917.4
906.3
824.8
768.2
706.8
425.9
329.0
15936.1
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
Subtotal
--
6
7
20
10
13
10
10
10
21
20
26
32
38
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
28
24
680
UNCLASSIFIED
63
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0064.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost Quantity Information - F-35 Engine
1506 | Procurement | Aircraft Procurement, Navy
End Item
Recurring
Fiscal
Flyaway
Quantity
Year
(Aligned With
Quantity)
BY 2012 $M
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
Subtotal
--
6
7
20
10
13
10
10
10
21
20
26
32
38
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
28
24
680
--
256.1
305.8
602.1
394.8
186.0
227.8
215.5
242.6
333.4
512.7
656.6
650.8
714.3
781.1
812.4
729.6
727.8
779.5
759.9
718.2
660.9
615.5
308.9
233.4
12425.7
UNCLASSIFIED
64
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0065.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Low Rate Initial Production
F-35 Aircraft
Item
Approval Date
Approved Quantity
Reference
Start Year
End Year
465
Milestone B ADM
2006
2015
Initial LRIP Decision
10/26/2001
5/23/2015
518
LRIP Approval ADM
2006
2019
Current Total LRIP
The Current Total LRIP Quantity is more than 10% of the total production quantity due to the necessity to prevent a break in
production and to ramp up to FRP.
F-35 Engine
Item
Approval Date
Approved Quantity
Reference
Start Year
End Year
465
Milestone B ADM
2006
2015
Initial LRIP Decision
10/26/2001
5/23/2015
518
LRIP Approval ADM
2006
2019
Current Total LRIP
The Current Total LRIP Quantity is more than 10% of the total production quantity due to the necessity to prevent a break in
production and to ramp up to FRP.
UNCLASSIFIED
65
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0066.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Foreign Military Sales
F-35 Aircraft
Date of
Sale
9/14/2015
Total
Cost $M
Country
Japan
Quantity
16
Description
Israel
2/15/2015
33
Korea
Notes
9/14/2014
40
4360.4 Japan signed an amendment to add 6 F-35A's in
September 2015. Japan has an option to purchase
26 additional F-35A aircraft.
5008.0 Israel signed an amendment to add 14 F-35A's in
February 2015. Israel has an option to purchase 17
additional F-35A aircraft.
6277.0 All 40 aircraft will be the F-35A aircraft.
F-35 Engine
Notes
FMS information for the F-35 Engine subprogram are reflected in the F-35 Aircraft subprogram.
Nuclear Costs
F-35 Aircraft
None
F-35 Engine
None
UNCLASSIFIED
66
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0067.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Unit Cost
F-35 Aircraft
Unit Cost Report
BY 2012 $M
Item
Current UCR
Baseline
(Jun 2014 APB)
274958.4
2457
111.908
224332.9
2443
91.827
BY 2012 $M
Item
Revised
Original UCR
Baseline
(Mar 2012 APB)
276482.2
2458
112.483
224333.7
2443
91.827
BY 2012 $M
Current Estimate
(Dec 2015 SAR)
% Change
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
261760.9
2457
106.537
211290.9
2443
86.488
BY 2012 $M
Current Estimate
(Dec 2015 SAR)
-4.80
-5.81
% Change
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
261760.9
2457
106.537
211290.9
2443
86.488
-5.29
-5.81
The DoD average F-35 Aircraft Unit Recurring Flyaway (URF) Cost consists of the Hardware (Airframe, Vehicle Systems,
Mission Systems, and Engineering Change Order) costs over the life of the program. The URF assumes the quantity
benefits of 115 FMS aircraft and 612 International Partner aircraft.
F-35A (Conventional Take Off and Landing) URF - $65.7 M (BY 2012)
F-35B (Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing) URF - $77.3M (BY 2012)
F-35C (Carrier Variant) URF - $78 M (BY 2012)
UNCLASSIFIED
67
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0068.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
F-35 Aircraft
Unit Cost History
Item
Original APB
APB as of January 2006
Revised Original APB
Prior APB
Current APB
Prior Annual SAR
Current Estimate
Date
Oct 2001
Mar 2004
Mar 2012
Mar 2012
Jun 2014
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
BY 2012 $M
PAUC
74.567
94.837
112.529
112.529
111.908
107.755
106.537
APUC
60.632
73.845
91.827
91.827
91.827
87.889
86.488
PAUC
TY $M
APUC
68.934
81.826
115.697
115.697
115.697
113.208
110.695
81.298
100.407
135.065
135.065
134.638
131.918
129.585
SAR Unit Cost History
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)
Initial PAUC
Development
Estimate
135.065
Changes
Econ
0.422
Qty
0.000
Sch
1.592
Eng
0.744
Est
-4.257
Oth
0.000
Spt
-3.981
Total
-5.480
PAUC
Current
Estimate
129.585
UNCLASSIFIED
68
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0069.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)
Initial APUC
Development
Estimate
115.697
Changes
Econ
0.427
Qty
0.000
Sch
1.602
Eng
0.748
Est
-3.775
Oth
0.000
Spt
-4.004
Total
-5.002
APUC
Current
Estimate
110.695
SAR Baseline History
Item
Milestone I
Milestone B
Milestone C
IOC
Total Cost (TY $M)
Total Quantity
PAUC
SAR
Planning
Estimate
N/A
Mar 2001
TBD
TBD
24800.0
N/A
N/A
SAR
Development
Estimate
Nov 1996
Mar 2012
Apr 2019
TBD
331855.2
2457
135.065
SAR
Production
Estimate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Current
Estimate
Nov 1996
Mar 2012
Apr 2019
Jul 2015
318390.9
2457
129.585
The Service IOC reflected in the above table is the U.S. Marine Corps Objective date. In addition, the U.S. Air Force IOC
objective date is August 2016, and the U.S. Navy IOC objective date is August 2018.
UNCLASSIFIED
69
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0070.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
F-35 Engine
Unit Cost Report
BY 2012 $M
Item
Current UCR
Baseline
(Jun 2014 APB)
55273.5
2457
22.496
42332.9
2443
17.328
BY 2012 $M
Item
Original UCR
Baseline
(Mar 2012 APB)
53916.4
2458
21.935
42332.9
2443
17.328
BY 2012 $M
Current Estimate
(Dec 2015 SAR)
% Change
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
51499.5
2457
20.960
38376.9
2443
15.709
BY 2012 $M
Current Estimate
(Dec 2015 SAR)
-6.83
-9.34
% Change
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost
Quantity
Unit Cost
51499.5
2457
20.960
38376.9
2443
15.709
-4.44
-9.34
The DoD average F-35 Engine Unit Recurring Flyaway (URF) Cost consists of the Hardware (Propulsion and Engineering
Change Order) costs over the life of the program. The URF assumes the quantity benefits of 115 FMS engines and 612
International Partner engines.
F-35A (Conventional Take Off and Landing) URF - $11 M (BY 2012)
F-35B (Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing) URF - $27.7 M (BY 2012)
F-35C (Carrier Variant) URF - $10.9 M (BY 2012)
UNCLASSIFIED
70
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0071.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
F-35 Engine
Unit Cost History
Item
Original APB
APB as of January 2006
Revised Original APB
Prior APB
Current APB
Prior Annual SAR
Current Estimate
Date
Mar 2012
N/A
N/A
Mar 2012
Jun 2014
Dec 2014
Dec 2015
BY 2012 $M
PAUC
21.989
N/A
N/A
21.989
22.496
22.626
20.960
APUC
17.328
N/A
N/A
17.328
17.328
17.378
15.709
PAUC
TY $M
APUC
21.708
N/A
N/A
21.708
21.708
22.526
19.930
25.990
N/A
N/A
25.990
26.396
27.274
24.685
SAR Unit Cost History
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)
Initial PAUC
Development
Estimate
25.990
Changes
Econ
0.054
Qty
0.000
Sch
0.303
Eng
0.000
Est
-0.501
Oth
0.000
Spt
-1.161
Total
-1.305
PAUC
Current
Estimate
24.685
UNCLASSIFIED
71
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0072.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)
Initial APUC
Development
Estimate
21.708
Changes
Econ
0.048
Qty
0.000
Sch
0.305
Eng
0.000
Est
-0.963
Oth
0.000
Spt
-1.167
Total
-1.777
APUC
Current
Estimate
19.930
SAR Baseline History
Item
Milestone A
Milestone B
Milestone C
IOC
Total Cost (TY $M)
Total Quantity
PAUC
SAR
Planning
Estimate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SAR
Development
Estimate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
63856.6
2457
25.990
SAR
Production
Estimate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Current
Estimate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
60651.1
2457
24.685
UNCLASSIFIED
72
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0073.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost Variance
F-35 Aircraft
Summary TY $M
Procurement
282647.8
Item
SAR Baseline (Development
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Total Changes
Current Estimate
RDT&E
MILCON
4797.3
Total
331855.2
44410.1
+24.6
--
--
--
-1507.9
--
--
-1483.3
-36.7
--
--
--
+280.0
--
--
+243.3
-1240.0
43170.1
+2886.2
--
+3425.5
--
-7348.4
--
-5043.7
-6080.4
-1842.6
--
+487.2
+1826.8
-1873.1
--
-4738.2
-6139.9
-12220.3
270427.5
+29.5
--
--
--
-199.7
--
--
-170.2
-25.2
--
--
--
+191.4
--
--
+166.2
-4.0
4793.3
+2940.3
--
+3425.5
--
-9056.0
--
-5043.7
-7733.9
-1904.5
--
+487.2
+1826.8
-1401.7
--
-4738.2
-5730.4
-13464.3
318390.9
UNCLASSIFIED
73
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0074.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Item
SAR Baseline (Development
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Total Changes
Current Estimate
Previous Estimate: December 2014
RDT&E
Summary BY 2012 $M
Procurement
224332.9
MILCON
4168.0
Total
276483.0
47982.1
--
--
--
--
-1870.0
--
--
-1870.0
--
--
--
--
+256.5
--
--
+256.5
-1613.5
46368.6
--
--
--
--
-5117.6
--
-4502.9
-9620.5
--
--
--
+1346.4
-1349.7
--
-3418.2
-3421.5
-13042.0
211290.9
--
--
--
--
-238.6
--
--
-238.6
--
--
--
--
+172.0
--
--
+172.0
-66.6
4101.4
--
--
--
--
-7226.2
--
-4502.9
-11729.1
--
--
--
+1346.4
-921.2
--
-3418.2
-2993.0
-14722.1
261760.9
UNCLASSIFIED
74
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0075.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
RDT&E
Current Change Explanations
Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Realignment of cost between the aircraft subprogram and engine subprogram (Air Force
(AF)). (Estimating)
Realignment of cost between the aircraft subprogram and engine subprogram (Navy).
(Estimating)
Revised estimate for Small Business Innovation Research in FY 2015 (Navy). (Estimating)
Revised estimate for additional operational testing requirements (AF). (Estimating)
Revised estimate for additional operational testing requirements (Navy). (Estimating)
Revised estimate to reflect application of new outyear inflation indices (Non- Treasury
Funds). (Estimating)
Increase due to realignment of program funding, congressional addition, and actual funding
investment (AF). (Estimating)
Decrease due to realignment of program funding, congressional reductions, and actual
funding investment (AF). (Estimating)
Increase due to realignment of program funding, congressional addition, and actual funding
investment (Navy). (Estimating)
RDT&E Subtotal
Procurement
Current Change Explanations
Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Stretch-out of procurement buy profile in FY 2016 to FY 2038 (Aircraft Procurement, AF
(APAF)). (Schedule)
Acceleration of procurement buy profile in FY 2016 to FY 2031 (Aircraft Procurement, Navy
(APN)). (Schedule)
Revised estimate for International procurement quantity profile adjustments (APAF).
(Estimating)
Revised estimate for International procurement quantity profile adjustments (APN).
(Estimating)
Revised estimate of Airframe cost due to the incorporation of the latest prime and
subcontractor actuals and labor/exchange rates (APAF). (Estimating)
Revised estimate of Airframe cost due to the incorporation of the latest prime and
subcontractor actuals and labor/exchange rates (APN). (Estimating)
Update for fact of life changes for prior years/lots 2006-2016 (APAF). (Estimating)
Update for fact of life changes for prior years/lots 2006-2016 (APN). (Estimating)
Decrease based on revised estimating assumptions for Block Buy and Multi-Year
Procurement (APN). (Estimating)
Decrease based on revised estimating assumptions for Block Buy and Multi-Year
Procurement (APAF). (Estimating)
Revised estimate of non-recurring costs (APAF). (Estimating)
Revised estimate of non-recurring costs (APN). (Estimating)
Base
Year
Base
Year
$M
Then
Year
-36.7
+27.8
+64.3
-46.2
-25.4
+81.2
+161.7
+0.8
+9.1
-0.8
+7.5
+243.3
N/A
+26.7
+60.5
-44.4
-24.1
+74.3
+147.7
+1.3
+8.6
-0.8
+6.7
+256.5
$M
Then
Year
-1842.6
+128.9
+1446.0
-958.8
-160.6
-23.7
+131.1
+676.1
-291.1
-75.5
-922.1
-1713.6
+254.6
+122.8
N/A
+120.5
0.0
0.0
-128.1
-18.1
+11.7
+572.8
-266.9
-71.4
-733.8
-1259.9
+224.3
+199.2
UNCLASSIFIED
75
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0076.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Additional funding for Band 2/5 requirements (APAF) (Engineering)
Additional funding for Band 2/5 requirements (APN). (Engineering)
Revised estimate for Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (APAF). (Support)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support)
Revised estimate for Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (APN). (Support)
Revised estimate for Initial Spares due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (APAF). (Support)
Revised estimate for Initial Spares due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (APN). (Support)
Procurement Subtotal
MILCON
Current Change Explanations
Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Revised estimate as a result of refined requirements (AF). (Estimating)
Revised estimate as a result of refined requirements (AF). (Estimating)
Revised estimate as a result of refined requirements ( Navy). (Estimating)
MILCON Subtotal
+945.2
+401.2
+1.8
+25.7
-494.5
-2480.8
-470.4
-3421.5
$M
Base
Year
N/A
+5.1
+313.1
-153.8
+7.6
+172.0
+1313.8
+513.0
+92.0
+27.1
-544.4
-3648.8
-664.1
-6139.9
Then
Year
-25.2
+5.4
+361.9
-185.3
+9.4
+166.2
UNCLASSIFIED
76
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0077.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Cost Variance
F-35 Engine
Summary TY $M
Procurement
53032.9
Item
SAR Baseline (Development
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Total Changes
Current Estimate
RDT&E
MILCON
--
Total
63856.6
10823.7
+21.2
--
--
--
+1136.7
--
--
+1157.9
-4.7
--
--
--
-14.0
--
--
-18.7
+1139.2
11962.9
+489.3
--
+645.6
--
+1695.7
--
-831.7
+1998.9
-373.1
--
+98.5
--
-4048.7
--
-2020.3
-6343.6
-4344.7
48688.2
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
+510.5
--
+645.6
--
+2832.4
--
-831.7
+3156.8
-377.8
--
+98.5
--
-4062.7
--
-2020.3
-6362.3
-3205.5
60651.1
UNCLASSIFIED
77
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0078.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Item
SAR Baseline (Development
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Current Changes
Economic
Quantity
Schedule
Engineering
Estimating
Other
Support
Subtotal
Total Changes
Current Estimate
Previous Estimate: December 2014
RDT&E
Summary BY 2012 $M
Procurement
42332.9
MILCON
--
Total
54028.1
11695.2
--
--
--
--
+1440.8
--
--
+1440.8
--
--
--
--
-13.4
--
--
-13.4
+1427.4
13122.6
--
--
--
--
+888.6
--
-766.3
+122.3
--
--
--
--
-2670.3
--
-1408.0
-4078.3
-3956.0
38376.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
+2329.4
--
-766.3
+1563.1
--
--
--
--
-2683.7
--
-1408.0
-4091.7
-2528.6
51499.5
UNCLASSIFIED
78
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0079.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
RDT&E
Current Change Explanations
Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Realignment of cost between the engine subprogram and aircraft subprogram (AF).
(Estimating)
Realignment of cost between the engine subprogram and aircraft subprogram (Navy).
(Estimating)
Decrease due to realignment of program funding, congressional reductions, and actual
funding investment (AF). (Estimating)
RDT&E Subtotal
Procurement
Current Change Explanations
Revised escalation indices. (Economic)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating)
Stretch-out of procurement buy profile in FY 2016 to FY 2038 (Engine Procurement, AF).
(Schedule)
Acceleration of procurement buy profile in FY 2016 to FY 2031 (Engine Procurement,
Navy). (Schedule)
Revised estimate for International procurement quantity adjustments (Engine Procurement,
AF). (Estimating)
Revised estimate for International procurement quantity adjustments (Engine Procurement,
Navy). (Estimating)
Revised estimate to reflect actuals (Engine Procurement, AF). (Estimating)
Revised estimate to reflect actuals (Engine Procurement, Navy). (Estimating)
Decrease based on revised estimating assumptions for Block Buy and Multi-Year
Procurement (Engine Procurement, AF). (Estimating)
Decrease based on revised estimating assumptions for Block Buy and Multi-Year
Procurement (Engine Procurement, Navy). (Estimating)
Update for fact of life changes for prior years/lots 2006-2016 (Engine Procurement, AF).
(Estimating)
Update for fact of life changes for prior years/lots 2006-2016 (Engine Procurement, Navy).
(Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support)
Revised estimate for Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Engine
Procurement, AF). (Support)
Revised estimate for Other Support due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Engine
Procurement, Navy). (Support)
Revised estimate for Initial Spares due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Engine
Procurement, AF). (Support)
Revised estimate for Initial Spares due to maturation of technical baseline, definition of
Base
Year
Base
Year
$M
Then
Year
-4.7
+4.3
-64.3
+46.2
-0.2
-18.7
N/A
+4.3
-60.9
+43.4
-0.2
-13.4
$M
Then
Year
-373.1
+19.0
+293.2
-194.7
-12.5
-5.1
-2326.2
-547.2
-643.3
-343.0
-52.1
-138.3
+5.0
-11.6
N/A
+17.8
0.0
0.0
-9.2
-3.8
-1445.7
-330.6
-457.1
-266.8
-47.9
-127.0
+4.8
-17.7
-85.3
-96.7
-1143.5
-1680.7
-166.3
-236.3
UNCLASSIFIED
79
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0080.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
customer requirements, and further definition of Service beddown plans (Engine
Procurement, Navy). (Support)
Procurement Subtotal
-4078.3
-6343.6
UNCLASSIFIED
80
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0081.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Contracts
General Notes
The Israel System Development and Demonstration and F135 LRIP 7 contracts no longer meet the threshold for the six
largest contracts.
Contract Identification
Appropriation:
Contract Name:
Contractor:
Contractor Location:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Award Date:
Definitization Date:
Procurement
F-35 LRIP 6
Lockheed Martin
1 Lockheed Boulevard
Ft. Worth, TX 76108
N00019-11-C-0083
Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)
December 28, 2012
September 27, 2013
Contract Price
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
7233.6
Ceiling
N/A
Qty
36
36
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
4392.1
Ceiling
N/A
Qty
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
7093.6
Program Manager
7233.6
Target Price Change Explanation
The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to definitization of
Production Non Recurring, Annualized Sustainment, Non-Annualized Sustainment, Depot, and Spares scope.
Contract Variance
Cost Variance
-131.2
-183.0
+51.8
Item
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015)
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change
Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations
Schedule Variance
-203.4
-193.0
-10.4
The favorable net change in the cost variance is due to sustainment supplier rate underruns, staffing shortfalls and material
procurement efficiencies.
The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to the remaining two Italian aircraft performing behind schedule
and due to tooling delays.
Notes
As a whole, the CLIN consist of multiple contract types including Fixed Price Incentive Fee as well as Cost Plus Incentive
Fee and Cost Plus Fixed-Fee. For this reason, the overall contract type is mixed and there is not a true contract ceiling.
UNCLASSIFIED
81
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0082.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Contract Identification
Appropriation:
Contract Name:
Contractor:
Contractor Location:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Award Date:
Definitization Date:
Procurement
F135 LRIP 6
Pratt & Whitney
400 Aircraft Road
Middletown, CT 06457
N00019-12-C-0090
Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)
January 06, 2012
February 15, 2013
Contract Price
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
1131.9
Ceiling
1139.0
Qty
38
38
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
1122.0
Ceiling
1128.8
Qty
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
1099.3
Program Manager
1091.6
Target Price Change Explanation
The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to the incorporaton of
a contract modification that extended the period of performance for CLIN 12 Service Specific Site Activation and added
some additional support equipment.
Contract Variance
Cost Variance
-10.9
-8.6
-2.3
Item
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015)
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change
Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations
Schedule Variance
-36.5
-31.0
-5.5
The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to general and administrative rate changes, additional costs with
design changes with Low Observables Advanced Baseline Acceptance Radar Inspection System work and the Low
Pressure Turbine Rotor hardware is over cost due to not enough cost reduction initiatives or engineering changes
implemented or better pricing from suppliers to support the baseline cost targets.
The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to to the Low Pressure Turbine and High Pressure Turbine
casting tools are late and the initial spares deliveries are late as the contractor is managing the demand requirements and
prioritizing the deliveries between the production requirements and spares.
UNCLASSIFIED
82
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0083.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Notes
The contract is a combination if Fixed Price Incentive Fee and Cost Plus Incentive Fee CLINs. For this reason, the overall
contract type is mixed and there is not a true contract ceiling. This contract includes both engines and Sustainment work
scope. All engines have been delivered and the remaining work is for tooling, support equipment and spare parts.
The Current Contract Ceiling Price is estimated based on the FPIF and CPIF CLINs.
Total Quantity includes aircraft engines and spare engines = 36 installs and two whole spares.
The earned value completion date and Contractor Performance Report reporting will be determined as the contract nears
completion.
Pratt & Whitney’s EVM System was decertified on September 30, 2013 due to sixteen significant deficiencies that affect
four of the 32 EVMS Guidelines. In accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, 5% of each
request for payment is being withheld until all significant deficiencies have been corrected.
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.
UNCLASSIFIED
83
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0084.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Contract Identification
Appropriation:
Contract Name:
Contractor:
Contractor Location:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Award Date:
Definitization Date:
Procurement
F-35 LRIP 7
Lockheed Martin
1 Lockheed Boulevard
Ft. Worth, TX 76108
N00019-12-C-0004
Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)
September 27, 2013
September 27, 2013
Contract Price
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
5640.4
Ceiling
N/A
Qty
35
35
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
4447.1
Ceiling
N/A
Qty
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
5547.1
Program Manager
5640.4
Target Price Change Explanation
The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to definitization of
Tech Assist, Non-Annualized Sustainment and Depot scope.
Contract Variance
Cost Variance
-78.6
-10.0
-68.6
Item
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015)
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change
Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations
Schedule Variance
-84.8
-46.0
-38.8
The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to Wing and Mate through Delivery due to part shortages driving out-
of-station work and labor inefficiencies. Unfavorable assembly cost performance is somewhat offset by Sustainment due to
supplier rate underruns, staffing shortfalls and material procurement efficiencies.
The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to multiple late Fire Control and Stores deliveries.
Notes
As a whole, the CLIN consist of multiple contract types including Fixed Price Incentive Fee as well as Cost Plus Incentive
Fee and Cost Plus Fixed-Fee. For this reason, the overall contract type is mixed and there is not a true contract ceiling.
UNCLASSIFIED
84
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0085.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Contract Identification
Appropriation:
Contract Name:
Contractor:
Contractor Location:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Award Date:
Definitization Date:
Procurement
F135 LRIP 8
Pratt & Whitney
400 Aircraft Road
Middletown, CT 06457
N00019-13-C-0016
Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)
August 27, 2013
October 30, 2014
Contract Price
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
1185.1
Ceiling
1191.4
Qty
48
48
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
1009.1
Ceiling
1011.9
Qty
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
1141.7
Program Manager
1185.1
Target Price Change Explanation
The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to the incorporation of
many contract modifications relating to tooling, Sustainment, extra long lead hardware options, operations and maintenance
work scope and unit and depot support equipment.
Contract Variance
Cost Variance
-68.9
--
-68.9
Item
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015)
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change
Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations
Schedule Variance
-9.5
--
-9.5
The unfavorable cumulative cost variance is due to general & administrative rate changes, higher costs with the Fan
Integrally Bladed Rotors and Externals Systems due to not enough cost reduction initiatives or engineering changes
implemented or better pricing from suppliers to support the baseline cost targets.
The unfavorable cumulative schedule variance is due to Fan, Externals and Turbine Exhaust hardware delivering late to
baseline plan due to quality issue.
UNCLASSIFIED
85
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0086.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Notes
The contract is a combination if Fixed Price Incentive Fee, Cost Plus Incentive Fee and Firm Fixed Priced CLINs. For this
reason, the overall contract type is mixed and there is not a true contract ceiling.
This contract includes both engines and Sustainment work scope. All engines have been delivered and the remaining work
is for tooling, support equipment and spare parts.
The Current Contract Ceiling Price is estimated based on the FPIF and CPIF CLINs.
Total Quantity includes aircraft engines and spare engines = 45 installs and three whole spares.
The earned value completion date and Contractor Performance Report reporting will be determined as the contract nears
completion. Pratt & Whitney’s EVM System was decertified on September 30, 2013 due to sixteen significant deficiencies
that affect four of the 32 EVMS Guidelines. In accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, 5% of
each request for payment is being withheld until all significant deficiencies have been corrected.
UNCLASSIFIED
86
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0087.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Contract Identification
Appropriation:
Contract Name:
Contractor:
Contractor Location:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Award Date:
Definitization Date:
Procurement
F-35 LRIP 8
Lockheed Martin
1 Lockheed Boulevard
Ft Worth, TX 76108
N00019-13-C-0008
Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)
February 28, 2013
November 21, 2014
Contract Price
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
5171.3
Ceiling
N/A
Qty
43
43
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
5153.5
Ceiling
N/A
Qty
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
5162.2
Program Manager
5171.3
Target Price Change Explanation
The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to authorization of
Reprogramming Center West Prime Mission Equipment.
Contract Variance
Cost Variance
-65.0
--
-65.0
Item
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015)
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change
Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations
Schedule Variance
-136.1
--
-136.1
The unfavorable cumulative cost variance is due to overruns within quality labor and material allocations. In addition,
unfavorable performance is due to ongoing part shortages within Forward Fuselage and Wing driving out-of-station work
and labor inefficiencies.
The unfavorable cumulative schedule variance is due to late spares and tool deliveries as well as assembly delays.
Notes
As a whole, the CLIN consist of multiple contract types including Fixed Price Incentive Fee as well as Cost Plus Incentive
Fee and Cost Plus Fixed-Fee. For this reason, the overall contract type is mixed and there is not a true contract ceiling.
UNCLASSIFIED
87
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0088.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Contract Identification
Appropriation:
Contract Name:
Contractor:
Contractor Location:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Award Date:
Definitization Date:
Procurement
FY15 Annualized Sustainment
Lockheed Martin
1 Lockheed Boulevard
Ft Worth, TX 76108
N00019-15-C-0031
Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)
October 28, 2014
November 01, 2014
Contract Price
Current Contract Price ($M)
Target
5171.3
Ceiling
N/A
Qty
43
43
Initial Contract Price ($M)
Target
5153.5
Ceiling
N/A
Qty
Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Contractor
5162.2
Program Manager
5171.3
Target Price Change Explanation
The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to Delta driven by
authorization of Reprogramming Center West Prime Mission Equipment.
Contract Variance
Cost Variance
-65.0
--
-65.0
Item
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015)
Previous Cumulative Variances
Net Change
Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations
Schedule Variance
-136.1
--
-136.1
The unfavorable cumulative cost variance is due to overruns within quality labor and material allocations. In addition,
unfavorable performance is due to ongoing part shortages within Forward Fuselage and Wing driving out-of-station work
and labor inefficiencies.
The unfavorable cumulative schedule variance is due to late spares and tool deliveries as well as assembly delays.
Notes
As a whole, the CLIN consist of multiple contract types including Fixed Price Incentive Fee as well as Cost Plus Incentive
Fee and Cost Plus Fixed-Fee. For this reason, the overall contract type is mixed and there is not a true contract ceiling.
UNCLASSIFIED
88
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0089.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Deliveries and Expenditures
F-35 Aircraft
Deliveries
Delivered to Date
Development
Production
Total Program Quantity Delivered
Planned to Date
14
148
162
Actual to Date
14
146
160
Total Quantity
14
2443
2457
Percent
Delivered
100.00%
5.98%
6.51%
Expended and Appropriated (TY $M)
Total Acquisition Cost
Expended to Date
Percent Expended
Total Funding Years
318390.9
66171.9
20.78%
45
Years Appropriated
Percent Years Appropriated
Appropriated to Date
Percent Appropriated
23
51.11%
91294.7
28.67%
The above data is current as of February 03, 2016.
Totals reflect U.S. aircraft only-no International Partner aircraft.
F-35 Engine
Deliveries
Delivered to Date
Development
Production
Total Program Quantity Delivered
Planned to Date
14
148
162
Actual to Date
14
146
160
Total Quantity
14
2443
2457
Percent
Delivered
100.00%
5.98%
6.51%
Expended and Appropriated (TY $M)
Total Acquisition Cost
Expended to Date
Percent Expended
Total Funding Years
60651.1
17008.4
28.04%
45
Years Appropriated
Percent Years Appropriated
Appropriated to Date
Percent Appropriated
23
51.11%
19924.7
32.85%
The above data is current as of February 03, 2016.
Engines planned and actual to date only include production installs.
UNCLASSIFIED
89
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0090.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Operating and Support Cost
F-35 Aircraft
Cost Estimate Details
Date of Estimate:
Source of Estimate:
Quantity to Sustain:
Unit of Measure:
Service Life per Unit:
Fiscal Years in Service:
March 07, 2016
CAPE ICE
2443
Flying Hour
32.00 Years
FY 2011 - FY 2070
Quantity to Sustain 2443 does not include 14 development aircraft.
Sustainment Strategy
The F-35 Product Support Manager (PSM) has developed and is executing a Sustainment Strategy that is consistent with
warfighter requirements, technical specifications, extant contracts, government policies, and best practices. The F-35
Sustainment Strategy expressly states that the F-35 Program will:
- Design, develop, deliver and sustain a single, integrated, and global system of sustainment products, processes, and
business practices. These actions will enable the F-35 Air System to achieve a high degree of effectiveness at an
affordable cost.
- Tailor the global system to meet warfighter-defined and PSM-supported readiness and cost objectives. This action will
ensure that the global system is responsive and flexible as operational needs vary over time.
- Maintain life-cycle focus, including the reduction of costs. This action will provide critical affordability benefits and further
supports a high degree of effectiveness as Air System maturity grows.
- Create a mutually-beneficial enterprise that – with relevant metrics and incentives – operates, manages, and supports
the global system. This action further improves responsiveness and enhances affordability.
- Leverage the global resource base – government and commercial – to take advantage of stakeholder capabilities,
human capital, best practices, and similar critical contributions. This action increases robustness and scalability as the F
-35 fleet grows and matures.
Antecedent Information
The F-35 family of aircraft variants will replace the following current aircraft: F-16C/D, A-10, F/A-18C/D, and AV-8B. The
F-35 O&S estimate is based on legacy fleet history only when F-35 specific data is not available.
Comparing the costs of the 5th Generation F-35 to legacy aircraft is challenging. The cost table above compares an
adjusted F-16C/D Cost per Flying Hour (CPFH) to a forecast of the CPFH for the F-35A variant. The F-35A CPFH figure
is based on the Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL) variant only. The F-35A CTOL variant will make up the
majority of the DoD F-35 aircraft procurement, accounting for 1,763 of 2,443 total aircraft currently planned for U.S.
forces.
The F-16C/D CPFH figures were developed in a joint effort between CAPE and the Air Force Cost Analysis Agency. The
UNCLASSIFIED
90
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0091.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
figures have been normalized for comparison to the F-35A CPFH forecast. The starting point for the F-16C/D CPFH is
an average of actual cost incurred for this fleet during FY 2008 through FY 2010. In order to enable the direct comparison
of the CPFH figures, the actual F-16C/D CPFH is adjusted to reflect the cost of fuel, the number of flight hours forecast
for the F-35A, and FY 2013 inflation indices. The F-16C/D figures include costs that F-16 shares with other Air Force
platforms: Systems Engineering/Program Management (SEPM), maintenance training costs, certain software
development efforts, and information systems. Costs for mission planning are included in the F-35A CPFH figure, but
equivalent costs for the F-16C/D are not available, and no adjustment was made for this element of cost. Finally, the F-
16C/D figures assume full funding of requirements consistent with the F-35A CPFH figures.
Annual O&S Costs BY2012 $K
Cost Element
Unit-Level Manpower
Unit Operations
Maintenance
Sustaining Support
Continuing System Improvements
Indirect Support
Other
Total
F-35 Aircraft
Average Annual Cost Per Flying
Hour
8.470
4.923
11.126
3.179
2.108
0.000
0.000
29.806
F-16C/D (Antecedent)
Cost Per Flying Hour ($)
10.042
5.632
5.501
2.075
2.291
0.000
0.000
25.541
The F-35A CTOL unitized cost figure shown in the table above decreased slightly relative to the comparable 2014 SAR
figure. There are three considerations that result in a slight decrease for the F-35A unitized cost shown above: 1) a
decrease in the assumed cost per gallon of JP-8 fuel; 2) a decrease in the fuel burn rate for the F-35A variant; and 3) a
revised cost estimating relationship for hardware modifications.
Given the significant increase in military capabilities provided, it is reasonable to expect F-35A to cost more to operate
and sustain than 4
th
generation legacy aircraft.
Total O&S Cost $M
Item
F-35 Aircraft
Current Development APB
Objective/Threshold
Base Year
Then Year
617000.0
1113272.6
678700.0
N/A
Current Estimate
620805.4
1123844.0
F-16C/D (Antecedent)
N/A
N/A
The Total O&S Cost figures above reflect the CAPE ICE estimate of O&S costs updated in 2015 in accordance with
tasking from Congress. The O&S cost estimate includes all three U.S. aircraft variants, is based on a forecast 30-year
service-life, and is based on planned usage rates provided by each relevant military service. The planned F-35 usage
rates, in terms of aircraft flight hours per year, are as follows: F-35A CTOL @ 250 hrs./yr.; F-35B STOVL @ 302 hrs./yr.;
and F-35C CV @ 316 hrs./yr. The total life-cycle cost estimate is not a simple extrapolation of the F-35A flying hour cost
shown in the unitized O&S cost table above. Total O&S costs are updated using FY 2015 inflation indices, and include
revised forecasts of labor escalation rates for military, civilian, and contractor personnel. A comparable total cost figure
for the antecedent system (i.e., F-16C/D) is not available.
The 2015 CAPE estimate of F-35 total life cycle O&S costs incorporates updated information regarding several key cost
UNCLASSIFIED
91
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0092.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
elements relative to the CAPE O&S cost estimate shown in the 2014 SAR. This includes updated fuel burn rates for all
variants, a reduction in the assumed price per gallon of both JP-5 and JP-8, use of updated escalation forecasts for
government personnel, a revised cost estimating relationship for hardware modifications, new Service bed down plans for
all variants, and updated depot-level repairable (DLR) costs. The updated information results in increased cost forecasts
for certain cost elements, and decreased cost forecasts for other elements. The 2015 CAPE total O&S estimate is
approximately 3.8% higher (in BY 2012 $) than the total O&S cost estimate in the 2014 SAR.
Not included in the 2015 CAPE estimate are the intermediate maintenance costs for the Marine Corps as observed with
the operational squadron at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma. Although the program of record (POR) acknowledges only
unit and depot levels of maintenance, it appears that the Department of Navy (DoN) is moving towards incorporating
some form of intermediate maintenance for its squadrons. However, the DoN has not made the decision to change the
POR at this point. While the extent of the additional maintenance level is currently unclear, a change in F-35
maintenance strategy appears to be likely for at least the DoN. CAPE recommends that the Services develop business
case analyses to determine the impact of intermediate maintenance levels on the respective F-35 variants, in terms of
both cost and readiness.
As in 2014, the CAPE O&S cost estimate incorporates actual information on component reliabilities obtained from the
ongoing F-35 flight operations, including flight test and field operations. This program information is provided from the
DoD test community, through Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, and includes actual reliability information on
many F-35 components based on data collected during approximately 31,000 hours of flight operations. The data include
all variants and flight operations through May 2015.
The reliability information has been compared to expected reliabilities for this stage of the program, for all variants, based
on reliability growth curves. The 2015 CAPE O&S estimate continues to reflect the increased DLR costs present in
the 2014 SAR estimate, because component reliability information obtained from actual flight operations data remains
inconsistent with expectations.
CAPE will continue to work with the DoD operational test community to improve the processes and methods used to
incorporate actual data and information on component reliabilities and removal rates, obtained from ongoing flight
operations, into the CAPE life-cycle O&S cost estimate for the F-35 program. This information will be used, together with
reliability improvement forecasts, to update the O&S cost estimates as the program proceeds to and beyond IOC. In the
future, the use of actual flight operations information could result in substantial changes in forecasts of DLR costs in
CAPE O&S estimates.
Affordability remains the F-35 program office number one priority. As such, the F-35 program team is focused on
reducing sustainment costs across the program. The program continues to target O&S cost avoidance through the Cost
War Room (CWR) and Reliability and Maintainability Improvement Program (RMIP). Concurrent to CWR activity, the
program office has taken strides to transition from analogy and parametric estimating approaches toward contracted
values to improve the O&S cost estimate’s accuracy. As a result of CWR affordability initiatives, requirement refinement,
and improved cost data quality, the program has reduced the program’s annual cost per flight hour.
The 2015 O&S POE of $579.1B BY 2012$ ($1.026 Trillion TY$) has been updated to reflect the latest technical baseline
for the program and incorporates revised stakeholder requirements. Primary updates to the 2015 POE include service
requirements, JP-5 and JP-8 fuel prices and consumption, hardware modification, and government/contractor manpower.
Note: values below in parentheses represent the change from the 2014 POE to the 2015 POE.
- U.S. Air Force extended the program’s life cycle by six years. In total, DoD assumes an additional 1.6 million flight hour
(11% increase) for F-35 operations (+$54.3B CY 2012 $)
- JP-5 and JP-8 fuel prices reflect Defense Logistics Agency catalog with consumption rates updated to reflect actuals (-
$24.6B CY 2012 $)
- Hardware modifications removed costs associated with capability updates as stated in 2014 CAPE guidance (-
$14.9B CY 2012 $)
UNCLASSIFIED
92
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0093.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
- Government / contractor manpower underwent a thorough assessment based on current LRIP requirements (+$3.7B
CY 2012 $)
The CAPE estimate incorporates the program office updates while adjusting reliability metrics and military personnel
compensation real price change. The program office does not support the CAPE’s use of actual reliability data from
ongoing flight operations. The reliability data used in the CAPE estimate is based on a mix of aircraft configurations and
represent only 9% of the hours required to reach Reliability and Maintainability maturity of the F-35 fleet. The CAPE
estimate accounted for the real price change of military personnel compensation. The program office does not have a
position on military personnel real price change and will incorporate once it becomes DoD guidance.
The F-35 PEO believes that the inherent differences between the F-35 and the F-16 estimates, such as mission planning
costs being included in F-35 but not F-16 and the fact that the F-16 is a mature weapons system with many reliability and
maintenance costs “leaned out” over the years, result in an overstating of the differences in cost per flying hour between
the two. Regardless of the difference, the F-35 program office is committed to, and has enacted multiple programs to
drive the O&S costs of the F-35 down.
Equation to Translate Annual Cost to Total Cost
The F-35 steady state cost per flying hour reflected in the annual O&S cost section does not easily translate to the Total
O&S value for the program because the total O&S costs reflect costs for all three variants of the F-35 for the U.S. Air
Force, U.S. Marine Corps, and U.S. Navy, whereas the CPFH reflects the U.S. Air Force F-35A only.
O&S Cost Variance
Category
Prior SAR Total O&S Estimates - Dec
2015 SAR
Programmatic/Planning Factors
Cost Estimating Methodology
Cost Data Update
Labor Rate
Energy Rate
Technical Input
Other
Total Changes
Current Estimate
BY 2012
$M
597773.6
41742.1 Service beddown plans updated and CTOL Manpower
Estimate Report revised.
-21304.7 Hardware modification cost estimating relationship revised.
4768.5 Spare Parts Unit Database updated.
7369.2 Escalation rates revised and inflation guidance updated.
-30858.6 Revised JP-5/JP-8 costs per gallon.
-5568.8 Increased fuel efficiency.
26884.1 Predicted cost per air vehicle induction increased and
indirect costs revised.
23031.8
620805.4
Change Explanations
Disposal Estimate Details
Date of Estimate:
Source of Estimate:
Disposal/Demilitarization Total Cost (BY 2012 $M):
Program maturity is not at a point where disposal costs can be estimated within an acceptable margin of error.
UNCLASSIFIED
93
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0094.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
F-35 Engine
Cost Estimate Details
Date of Estimate:
Source of Estimate:
Quantity to Sustain:
Unit of Measure:
Service Life per Unit:
Fiscal Years in Service:
O&S costs for the engine subprogram are included in the overall program costs that are shown in the F-35 Aircraft
subprogram.
Sustainment Strategy
.
Antecedent Information
.
Annual O&S Costs BY2012 $K
Cost Element
Unit-Level Manpower
Unit Operations
Maintenance
Sustaining Support
Continuing System Improvements
Indirect Support
Other
Total
F-35 Engine
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
--
No Antecedent (Antecedent)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
--
Total O&S Cost $M
Item
F-35 Engine
Current Development APB
Objective/Threshold
Base Year
Then Year
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
O&S Cost Variance
Category
Prior SAR Total O&S Estimates - Dec
2015 SAR
BY 2012
$M
0.0
Change Explanations
Current Estimate
N/A
N/A
No Antecedent
(Antecedent)
N/A
0.0
UNCLASSIFIED
94
FOU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 165: Spm. om en redegørelse for konklusionerne og beregningerne i de amerikanske SAR rapporter, der evaluerer omkostningerne på at flyve henholdsvis Boeings Super Hornet (2012) og Lockheed Martins F-35 (2014), til forsvarsministeren
1631840_0095.png
F-35
December 2015 SAR
Programmatic/Planning Factors
Cost Estimating Methodology
Cost Data Update
Labor Rate
Energy Rate
Technical Input
Other
Total Changes
Current Estimate
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Disposal Estimate Details
Date of Estimate:
Source of Estimate:
Disposal/Demilitarization Total Cost (BY 2012 $M):
UNCLASSIFIED
95