REU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Bilag 82: Henvendelse af 23/10 og 15/11-15 fra Jørgen Larsen vedr. fjernelse af ulovligt materiale på nettet.

Retsudvalget 2015-16
REU Alm.del Bilag 82
Offentligt

Synopsis:

Model on how to remove criminal material from the internet

and avoid major society threatening hacker attacks.

* Childporn, bomb manuals, hacker attack etc

Criteria of success:



Low cost.

Efficiency

Method of implementation: Organic

Easy to maintain and control

Society threats from BOT’s and hackers can fast be

stopped

Jørgen Larsen

Nattergalvej 13 st th

8900 Randers

Denmark

Mobile:

+45 29 82 43 97

E-mail:

[email protected]

REU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Bilag 82: Henvendelse af 23/10 og 15/11-15 fra Jørgen Larsen vedr. fjernelse af ulovligt materiale på nettet.

Foreword:

The fight against childporn, copyrights infringement and other illigal material can soon be lost if no

action are taken soon in order to gain control over the internet.

The nature of the internet is changing from STAR to MESH and POINT TO POINT.

Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_topology

Above makes it more or less impossible to control the flow on the internet. As central control /

surveillance is futile.

Threats:

The task of surveillance is further made harder caused be encryption:

T.ex. Uses SKYPE AES encoding.

Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_security

TOR

Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)

Change of identity:

Vidalia (Changing identity to a TOR exit node)

Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidalia_project

REU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Bilag 82: Henvendelse af 23/10 og 15/11-15 fra Jørgen Larsen vedr. fjernelse af ulovligt materiale på nettet.

What to do ?

Controlling illigal material ”on the fly” is impossible caused by encryption. Further it is not possible

to gain control caused by network topology.

The ONLY weak spot is on the local PC. When material are decrypted.

All files does have a fingerprint.

Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_key_fingerprint

Illigal KNOWN material can be distinguished by a small amount of data. Fingerprints.

All fingprints of illiagal material shall be collected in an EU database controlled by Europol.

SO....

Now we can use conventional EXISTING technology...

The antivirus programmes which ALL computer are using. One version or another. Common for

ALL virus programms are they are using fingerprints as described above.

My idea is based on:

1. EU legislation specifying that Europol are keeping and maintaining a database for

fingerprints.

2. Al virusprogrammes SHALL – by EU law - use the database of fingerprints specified

by Europol.

3. Caused by the vast number of fingerprints to be checked statitical methods shall

be developed for proper coverage.

4. Action to be taken upon found illigal material shall be stated by EU legislation.

5. Defining severity of the – electronic - criminal act(s) to be defined by EU.

Benefit from above:

Effenciency

Distributed load of the task doing the actual check(s)

Easy to maintain and develop.

Organic growth

Cost are spread organically to end users.

Only cost are Europols central database.

REU, Alm.del - 2015-16 - Bilag 82: Henvendelse af 23/10 og 15/11-15 fra Jørgen Larsen vedr. fjernelse af ulovligt materiale på nettet.