Udvalget for Udlændinge- og Integrationspolitik 2014-15 (1. samling)
UUI Alm.del Bilag 11
Offentligt
30 October 2014
TO: The Immigration and Integration Affairs Committee
Greetings.
I am an American whose family is here on the Green Card Scheme. I wrote to members of the
Immigration and Integration Affairs Committee individually, but it has been recommended to me to
write a letter just to the committee, also for publication on the website. I want to relate to every person
serving on this committee the significant personal and financial cost that the retroactive application of
the extension rules will impose upon current Green Card holders. The new extension rules (particularly
the extension rule requiring the Green Card holder to earn at least 315,000 DKK annually in order to
obtain a second extension), absolutely should not be applied to people who came here based on the
prior representations that the Danish government made. To do so is fundamentally unjust, financially
harmful, discriminatory and will discourage anyone, no matter how talented or needed, from coming to
Denmark. Government should make life predictable, not arbitrary. Government should not foster the
financial destruction of a family. Just like people should abide by their promises, so should
government. We don't trust people who violate business deals; we should not trust governments who
violate business deals.
In my family, my husband Eric Olmanson (PhD in Geography from the University of Wisconsin) is the
actual Green Card holder, while I (Juris Doctor from the University of Wisconsin, with sixteen years as
a licensed attorney) am technically the accompanying spouse, although I qualify for a Green Card in
my own right (we did it this way because it was cheaper for me to apply as an accompanying spouse).
We arrived in Denmark with our two daughters, age 6 and 10, in April this year.
Not everyone who applies for the Green Card scheme does so just for the job. I had an excellent
position as an attorney back home and was rather high up in state government. In fact, I was Assistant
Legal Counsel to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections. I made $84,000 per year, plus excellent
fringe benefits (pension, vacation, health and dental insurance, life insurance), which brought my
effective salary up to over $110,000 per year. My husband picked up lectureships at the University of
Wisconsin, and also wrote institutional histories, on commission. We had our home paid off (and we
owned another home outright as well) and were financially settled. However, for philosophical reasons
we sought to come to Denmark.
We walked away from the financial security we had in America to come to Denmark, based on
representations made by Danish Immigration Service and the Danish Agency for Labour Market and
Recruitment that extension would be based on #1 Eric working an average of 10 hours per week, #2
none of us committing any crimes, and #3 we would not request or accept any money under the Active
Social Welfare Act. There was no requirement that people would need to earn at least 315,000 DKK
annually in order to obtain a second extension.
Coming to Denmark cost our family close to $40,000, not counting the tens of thousands of dollars in
income we have lost as a result of me resigning from my position in state government to come here.
We cashed in my deferred income of over $20,000. We cashed in the savings plans we had put together
for our daughters' future university education. We used both my savings and my husbands's savings.
Additionally, we sold our collection of many thousands of books (I'm not exaggerating; we owned
enough books to furnish a small town's library) for a small fraction of what we paid for them and for a
small fraction of what it would cost for us to replace them, if we were to return to the US.