Udenrigsudvalget 2014-15 (1. samling)
URU Alm.del Bilag 83
Offentligt
1486673_0001.png
Bilag 3 – Oversigt over RAM-modellens 24 standarder
RESOURCE ALLOCATION MODEL (RAM)
FOR FRAMEWORK ORGANISATIONS
STANDARDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING
ASSESSMENT
AREA
3.1
No.
1.
Context analysis
STRATEGIC PLANNING
STRATEGIC FOCUS & GOALS / LOGIC OF INTERVENTION
Standard
The organisation illustrates that the submitted plan has been informed by context analyses.
Context analyses comprising:
addressing the causes of poverty, rights violations, inequality and/or vulnerability, incl
the political, social, economic and security context in which the programmes will be
implemented
identifying drivers of change as part of a stakeholder analysis
assessing risks (political, environmental, security etc.) and vulnerability, including ,
where appropriate, fragility and transition to rehabilitation and development.
2.
Strategic choice of intervention
The organisation presents a clear strategic choice of intervention at portfolio level.
The choice of intervention including:
a clear logic of intervention (theory of change or similar) with clear strategies for
geographical/ thematic choices and targeting of rights holders (disaggregated groups),
and appropriate to the general, specific and changing context (incl fragility)
reference to the organisation’s strategy on advocacy and engagement of duty bearers
clear, coherent strategic objectives framed within the organisation’s strategic focus, scale
and risk willingness
3.
Strategy development and planning
The organisation accounts for its approach to strategy development and planning processes.
An approach illustrating:
engagement of partners as equals in joint development interventions
ensuring alignment to partner organisations’ strategic focus
taking account of the views of other relevant stakeholders and drivers of change at
international, national or local level ( e.g. rights holders, duty bearers, civil society,
government, private sector, etc.)
4.
Human rights based approach
The organisation has mainstreamed a human rights based approach in the organisation’s
strategic focus, goals and plans
1
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1486673_0002.png
Mainstreaming of HRBA in the plan:
being reflected in linking to human rights standards
integrating the PANT principles: Participation, Accountability, Non-discrimination,
Transparency
being explicit on HRBA capacity development of partners
5.
Innovation
The organisation demonstrates a strategic approach to innovation.
The approach to innovation:
addressing innovation in partnership relations, in organisation forms and/or at
programme level
including strategies for management of risks and opportunities
being operationalized and measurable
6.
Partnership
The organisation presents its planned choice of partners and partnership approach in relation
to strategic goals and global context.
Choice of partners and partnership approach including:
strategic reflections on the risk willingness in and choice of civil society partners (e.g.
drivers of change, types of partners, funded/non-funded relations, and other forms of
collaboration)
elaborate on the organisation’s engagement in strategic partnerships with other
partners than civil society
illustrate the approach to partnership development, e.g. efforts to promote the
partners’ autonomy and/or greater equality in the partner relations
7.
Capacity development of partner organisations
The organisation presents its approach to capacity development of partner organisations
The approach to capacity development reflecting plans to develop:
partner autonomy as an independent, legitimate driver of change
partner capacity to respond adequately to context
sustainability of outcome of capacity development at partnership level
8.
Added value in the context of mutual contributions
The organisation’s intended added value to change processes, created in the context of
mutuality with partners and allies.
The presentation of the organisation’s added value:
comprising a distinct and relevant strategic framing of the organisation’s added value
to change processes
describing the intended causality of the added value and on which level the added value
will be manifested
being operationalized and measurable
2
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1486673_0003.png
ASSESSMENT
AREA
3.2
No.
9.
RESULTS REPORTING
EVIDENCE OF CHANGE
Standard
Change at the level of rights holders and relations to duty bearers
The organisation’s contribution together with partners to positive and significant changes at
micro level
Changes at micro level described in terms of:
goal achievement measured against own objectives/targets, with critical reflections on
lessons learnt
empowerment of targeted rights holders (disaggregated groups) and engagement of
duty bearers (if planned for), taking into account fragility issues, where relevant
use of appropriate risk monitoring and risk management interventions to minimize risks
and adapt strategies, including efforts to ensure long-term sustainability
10.
Change at the level of policy processes
The organisation’s contribution together with partners to positive and significant changes in
development processes/systems, policy processes or policy implementation at the meso/macro
level as a result of advocacy efforts
Changes at meso/macro level as a result of advocacy efforts in terms of:
goal achievement measured against own objectives/targets, with critical reflections on
lessons learnt
spaces for civil society engagement and engagement in strategic alliances/coalitions,
taking into account fragility issues, where relevant
use of appropriate risk monitoring and risk management interventions to minimize risks
and adapt strategies, including efforts to ensure long-term sustainability
11.
Harmonisation and alignment
The organisation documents effects of harmonisation and alignment efforts
Effects illustrated by efforts to:
co-ordinate and/or harmonise with other civil society organisations, donors, etc.
align to partners’ programme/implementation strategies, systems and/or procedures
lessen the financial and administrative burden of the partners within harmonised
arrangements
12.
Human rights based approach
The organisation’s contribution to effects ofapplying a human rights based approach in the
programmes
Effects of applying a human rights based approach illustrated by::
goal achievement on HRBA efforts, with critical reflections on lessons learnt
linking to human rights standards
integration of the PANT principles: Participation, Accountability, Non-discrimination,
Transparency
3
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1486673_0004.png
13.
Innovation
The organisation documents developments in relation to innovation
Developments through innovation as illustrated by:
goal achievement measured against own plan and milestones, with critical reflections
on lessons learnt
planned and unplanned changes of innovation processes in partnership relations, in
organisation forms, and/or at programme level
use of appropriate risk monitoring and risk management interventions to minimize risks
and adapt strategies
14.
Partnership
The organisation accounts for its choice of partners and partnership approach in relation to
strategic goals and context
Status illustrated by:
status in civil society partnership portfolio (e.g. drivers of change, types of partners,
funded/non-funded relations, and other forms of collaboration), including use of risk
monitoring
status in the organisation’s engagement in strategic partnerships with other partners
than civil society
changes from efforts to promote partner autonomy and/or greater equality in the
partner relations
15.
Capacity development of partners
The organisation’s contribution to positive changes for the partner organisations as a result of
capacity development
Results in terms of:
goal achievement measured against own objectives/targets, with critical reflections on
lessons learnt
partner autonomy as an independent, legitimate driver of change
partner capacity to respond adequately to context
16.
Mutual learning within partnerships
The organisation describes how mutual learning within the partnership relation has taken place
Mutual learning covering:
co-creative structures and processes with partners, including how it has been unfolded
in practice
mutual responsiveness towards emerging trends
mutual openness towards different perspectives in the partnerships (incl use of self-
assessment tools)
4
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1486673_0005.png
17.
Added value in the context of mutual contributions
The organisation accounts for its contribution to change processes, derived from the
organisation’s added value and created in mutuality with partners and allies
Developments in added value seen in relation to:
goal achievement measured against own indicators, with critical reflections on lessons
learnt
the intended causality of the added value, i.e. bringing about change
(micro/meso/macro level)
including the partners’ view on the value added by the Danish organisation
18.
Mainstreaming of learning
The organisation demonstrates that learning is mainstreamed into wider organisational
learning (in work in Denmark and in partner countries)
Mainstreaming of learning based on:
evidence-based learning generated from programme implementation, evaluation and
research
putting into practice learning from failures/non-achievements
replication of good practice, where relevant
5
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1486673_0006.png
ASSESSMENT
AREA
3.3
No.
19.
Value for money
STRATEGIC FINANCING FOR SUSTAINABILITY
Standard
The organisation has established transparency around goal achievements vs. resources spent
Transparency as illustrated by:
use of value for money considerations to inform financial decisions
critical reflections on methodology (including validity and reliability) of measurements
accounting on cost effectiveness, which is appropriate to strategic focus and
programmes of the organisation
20.
Funding mechanisms with partners
The organisation describes efforts to put in place funding mechanisms with the partners that
promote risk willingness and partners’ financial autonomy
Funding mechanisms that:
accommodate the needs of different and new types of partners and/or partnership
relations
promote partner driven financial decision-making and disbursement
promote innovative approaches to budget holding and/or contracting responsibilities in
the partnership
21.
Framework organisations’ own funding
The organisation accounts for approaches to optimise the organisation’s own financial base for
autonomy and independence
Autonomy and independence as illustrated through:
diversification of funding base
financial resourcing to operate at a strategic level
efforts to increase internal cost efficiency without compromising effectiveness
6
 PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1486673_0007.png
ASSESSMENT
AREA
3.4
No.
22.
ROLE AS DANISH CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATION
Standard
Development education and Popular foundation
The organisation accounts for its plans and achievements in development education and
popular foundation
Plans and achievements relying on:
a communication strategy and popular foundation strategy, including clearly
differentiated target groups
objectives appropriate to scale and focus of the organisation
goal achievement measured against own objectives/targets, accompanied by
reflections on lessons learnt
23.
Policy development and influence in Denmark
The organisation accounts for its plans and achievements in relation to relevant policy
development and policy influence in Denmark
The organisation elaborates on:
the strategic fit between the organisation’s global agendas/campaigns and the
organisation’s policy engagement in Denmark
the relevance and validity of policy analyses and engagement in alliances/networks
goal achievement measured against own objectives/targets, accompanied by
reflections on lessons learnt
24.
Global engagement beyond Denmark
The organisation describes its contribution to global agenda setting and global engagement
A coherent approach illustrated through:
the linkage of the organisation’s global agendas/campaigns to evidence-based
relevance at national and local level in partner countries, including at partner level
the relevance and validity of policy analyses and own and partners’ engagement in
alliances/networks
goal achievement measured against own objectives/targets, accompanied by
reflections on lessons learnt
7