PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Udenrigsudvalget 2014-15 (1. samling)
URU Alm.del Bilag 25
Offentligt

Danish Organisation Strategy

for

World Health Organization

2014-2019

July 2014

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

1. Objective

The World Health Organization (WHO) is the United Nations specialised agency for health, established on

7 April 1948. As set out in the WHO Constitution, the objective of the organisation is to attain the highest

possible level of health for all people. Health is defined in the WHO Constitution as a state of complete

physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.

WHO provides leadership on global health matters and is responsible for shaping the health research

agenda by setting norms and standards, articulating evidence-based policy options providing technical

support to countries as well as monitoring and assessing health trends.

Danish support to and cooperation with WHO is shared between the Ministry of Health (assessed

contribution) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (voluntary contribution). This strategy for the cooperation

between Denmark and WHO for 2014-2019

, forms the basis for the Danish voluntary contributions to

WHO

, and is the central platform for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ dialogue and partnership with the

organisation. It sets up Danish priorities for WHO’s performance within the overall framework established

by WHO’s own strategy, the Twelfth General Programme of Work (2014-2019). In addition, it outlines

specific goals and results that Denmark will pursue in its cooperation with the organisation. Denmark will

work closely with like-minded countries towards the achievement of results through its efforts to pursue

specific goals and priorities.

2. The Organisation

2.1 Basic Data and Management Structure

WHO works together with governments, health authorities, civil society, universities and research centres

to create greater access to basic health services for the public, including poor and vulnerable population

groups. The organisation also works to build up the competencies of developing countries to take care of

the health need of their own citizens, and it continues to

Established

1948

play an important role in the supervision and control of

Geneva

epidemics.

Director-General

Dr Margaret Chan

Budget for 2014-2015

WHO is a specialised agency within the United Nations

system. WHO is governed by its 194 Member States

through the meeting of the World Health Assembly

(WHA) held annually in Geneva. The WHA is supported

by the Executive Board which comprise 34 individuals

qualified in the field of health, and designated by

Member States to serve on the Executive Board for

three-year terms. The board advises the WHA and

facilitates its work.

Danish MFA voluntary

contribution in 2014

Danish Assessed con-

tribution MoH in 2014

Human Resources

Country offices

Denmark member of

Executive Board

World Health Assembly

EB sessions

USD 3.98 bill.

(assessed and

voluntary)

DKK 30 mill.

(appr. USD 5.6 mill.)

USD 3.14 mill.

(appr. DKK 17 mill.)

Approx. 8.000

150 countries

May 2006 –

May 2009

May

January & May

At global level WHO headquarters based in Geneva is responsible for the overall management and

administration of the organisation. At regional level the organisation is divided into six regions with a

regional office for each; WHO African Region, WHO Region of the Americas, WHO Eastern Mediterranean

Region, WHO European Region (based in Copenhagen), WHO South-East Asia Region and WHO Western

Pacific Region. The regional offices are fairly independent and their directors are appointed by the

Executive Board in agreement with the Director General. At country level WHO operates in 150 countries,

territories and areas.

Through a renewed country focus WHO seeks to improve performance at the country level according to

needs. Each country develops a country cooperation strategy to guide its work. The regional offices

oversee this work and provide technical assistance to country offices as required.

WHO’s twelfth General Programme of Work 2014-2019, Biennial Programme and Budget: 2014-2015, 2016-2017 and 2018-2019.

Under FL §06/Development Cooperation.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

2.2 Mandate and Mission

WHO is a leading organisation for the promotion of global health and development. Broadly it has two

roles; a normative (e.g. establishing standards) and a developmental (e.g. providing technical assistance

to developing countries on health systems). WHO’s primary aims are to maintain, secure and improve the

state of health in the world.

The core functions of WHO are:



To provide leadership on matters critical to health and engage in partnerships where joint action is

needed



To shape the research agenda, and stimulate the generation, translation and dissemination of

valuable knowledge



To set norms and standards, as well as promote and monitor their implementation



To articulate ethical and evidence-based policy options



To provide technical support, catalyse change and build sustainable institutional capacity



To monitor the health situation and assess health trends.

The vision and work of WHO are guided by the twelfth general programme of work, supplemented by

biennial program budgets, the current covering 2014-2015. The general programme of work and the

program budget have goals on both impact and outcome level. Of the six priorities that guide WHO’s

work five relate to health: Communicable diseases; Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs); Promoting

health through the life course; Health systems, and Preparedness, Surveillance and response; and one

relates to governance: Corporate services and enabling functions. An overview of the six priorities can be

found in annex 1.

The normative and standard setting work of WHO is a prerequisite for the work carried out by the UNFPA,

Global Fund, UNAIDS and other multilateral organisations addressing health and equity issues. WHO is

both a co-sponsor of UNAIDS and provides technical support for prevention, treatment and medical

supplies to the organisation. In May 2014 WHO and Global Fund signed an agreement on WHO technical

assistance to the development of Global Fund country concept notes as part of the roll out of the “Global

Fund New Funding Model”. Furthermore, WHO works closely with other UN agencies and external

partners to mobilise political will and material resources. WHO’s role in providing technical assistance and

guidance to countries is crucial in order to advance sustainable health development at country level.

The two-year budget for 2014-2015 is USD 3.9 billion or at the same level as in 2012-2013. Denmark’s

joint, assessed and voluntary, contributions amount to approximately 0.22% of the total budget.

2.3 Mode of Operation and Results so far

WHO has contributed to substantial progress in achieving the health related 2015-goals: Reducing child

(MDG4) and maternal mortality (MDG5) as well as reducing morbidity and mortality from HIV infection,

tuberculosis and malaria

(MDG6). More specifically, WHO contributed to; a reduction in the number of

under-five deaths from 7.6 million in 2010 to 6.6 million in 2012, a continued fall in Malaria cases setting

50 endemic countries on track to reach targets by 2015, and implementation of a rapid diagnostic test for

Tuberculosis in 77 countries ensuring screening for TB in 4.1 million HIV infected. Moreover new AIDS

related guidelines have been implemented to reduce partner transmission.

Furthermore, the work towards universal health coverage (UHC)

is progressing, thus in 2012 a third of

all member states requested technical assistance from WHO on health financing in moving their health

systems towards UHC. In discussions on the post-2015 UN development agenda WHO has initially

proposed that UHC is included as an overarching health goal to address the global health challenges.

World Health Organization:

WHO Achievements 2012:

http://www.who.int/about/resources_planning/2012achievements.pdf.

“Universal health coverage (…) combines two fundamental components: Access to the services needed to achieve good health (promotion,

prevention, treatment and rehabilitation, including those that address health determinants) with the financial protection that prevents ill health

leading to poverty.”,

Twelfth General Programme of Work p. 17.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

In order to target health inequities WHO focuses on social determinants of health that account for

differences in health status within and between countries. Thus in 2012 the World Health Assembly

adopted a resolution endorsing the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health.

2.4 Effectiveness of the Organisation

The Danish multilateral analysis

states that WHO remains highly relevant for overall poverty reduction,

advancement of social progress and achievement of health related MDGs. However, in general the

continued effectiveness and relevance of WHO will require a successful reform process, with bold steps to

focus and strengthen institutional priorities and efficiency at all levels of the organisation (HQ, region and

country offices). One of the major challenges arises from the underfunding of some areas (e.g. the

Danish priority areas Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights, and Gender, Equity and Human Rights

Mainstreaming) due to earmarked funding from the majority of donors. As a member State-driven

organisation, where reform issues will be the subject of inter-governmental processes, it is to be

expected that advancing on the reform program will be a long term process. Danish disappointment with

the slow progress of the reform, especially underfunding of Danish priority areas and overall

misalignment between strategic objectives set and resources, led to the decision to decrease Danish

voluntary commitment from 2014. Efforts to improve the alignment have been made, thus, WHO has

taken on annual financing dialogues and established a web portal to allow for more transparency and

preferably better alignment of funds.

WHO’s engagement in and commitment to the 'Delivering as One' agenda has historically not been

perceived as strong, and doubts as to the usefulness of the system and of UN coordination has been

indicated by WHO. In the Program-Budget for 2014-2015 WHO has now included its share of the joint

coordination costs (the Resident Coordinator system). However, continued encouragement to ensure that

all tree levels of the organization are fully committed to UN coherence and coordination will be needed.

The 2013 MOPAN assessment of WHO reaffirmed the need for ongoing reforms and points to the not yet

fully developed results culture at all levels of the organisation. Overall the MOPAN conclusion is that the

limitations in the WHO framework and systems to report on organisation-wide expected results make it

challenging to understand WHO’s performance story fully and identify its contributions to each of its

strategic objectives. The assessment states that WHO’s commitment to organisational development is

likely to improve the organisations effectiveness and efficiency, although the assessors find that it is too

early to conclude on the full effects.

The assessment also finds that on the strategic management level WHO works well towards

mainstreaming gender, equity and human rights by launching an approach that establishes performance

standards for these areas. Also when it comes to WHO’s pragmatic work regarding mainstreaming of

gender equality the assessment rates WHO’s performance as adequate or above. On an operational

management level allocation of funding needs to be made more transparent and consistent. The lowest

ranking area in the MOPAN assessment is for results-based budgeting, however, as part of the reform

WHO will continue to implement a new results-based budgeting system (RBB) during 2014.

A Norwegian assessment from 2013

agrees with the overall positive assessment of WHO, but also points

out that the organisation needs to continue the reform process to give more transparency and easily

measurable indicators of success. It furthermore states that WHO continues to be the leading

coordinating body for health. UK Aid (DFID) undertook a large review of multilateral aid

in 2011, which

was updated end 2013. The update concluded that WHO now has better information about its use of

resources and its programmes, but that further progress is needed on improving performance

management systems, particularly for staff and results. The assessment concludes that WHO show weak

contributions to results but that the organisation has made reasonable progress in this area. Moreover

the assessment states that WHO gives adequate value for money for UK Aid.

Danida 2013:

Danish Multilateral Development Cooperation Analysis.

Copenhagen, April 2013.

Utenriksdepartementet.

Vurdering av 29 multilaterale organisasjoner.

Oslo, October 2013.

DFID 2012:

Multilateral Aid Review

and

Multilateral Aid Review Update: Driving reform to achieve multilateral effectiveness.

December 2013.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

3. Key Strategic Challenges and Opportunities

3.1 Summary of Preparatory Analysis

Relevance and Justification of Future Danish Support

Support to WHO is fully in line with

The Right to a Better Life,

the Strategy for Denmark’s Development

Cooperation, especially the thematic priority area “Social Progress”. WHO has a key role in international

efforts to strengthen social protection, particular for poor and vulnerable groups and to promote sexual

and reproductive health and rights, including the fight against HIV/AIDS.

The basic principles in WHO’s Constitution have a strong focus on human rights. It states that “The

enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human

being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition”. This is echoed in

General Programme of Work which also has a clear overarching focus on equity, social justice and gender

equality. The Constitution further underlines that Governments have a responsibility for the health of

their peoples which can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social measures. Given

WHO's primary role at country level in advising and supporting governments, the main human rights-

focus is on the duty bearer perspective. However if part of WHO’s dialogue and cooperation with

governments includes aspects of increasing accountability, transparency, participation and inclusion, this

will help the rights-bearers to claim their rights.

In relation to the broader development agenda incl. green growth, better health is seen as; a

precondition for, an outcome of, and an indicator of all three dimensions of sustainable development.

WHO emphasises that a healthy environment is a prerequisite for good health. Furthermore, healthy

people are better able to learn, be productive and contribute to their communities. Action on the social

and environmental determinants of health, both for the poor and the vulnerable and the entire

population, is important to create inclusive, equitable, economically productive and healthy societies.

The interdependence between health and peace and security is underlined in WHO’s Constitution which

states that “The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and security and is

dependent upon the fullest co-operation of individuals and States”.

Major Challenges and Risks

Many of the challenges and opportunities that the world faces have direct implications for global health.

In its twelfth Programme of Work, WHO lists the following as central issues; a continuing economic

downturn, rapid unplanned urbanization, the demographic dividend, the fragmentation in global health

partnerships and actors, as well as the global environment, incl. climate change, under pressure.

Continuing economic downturn with decreases in public spending both nationally and for development aid

might have negative impact on basic service, including health, and thus WHO might experience

increasing challenges in achieving especially the impact (disease related) goal set for the Global Program.

With the current MDGs, three out of eight goals have focussed on health: Reducing child (MDG4) and

maternal mortality (MDG5) as well as reducing morbidity and mortality from HIV infection, tuberculosis

and malaria (MDG6). This has created international attention on health on the development agenda and

provided a good basis for WHO’s work. However, WHO has also been challenged by the often vertical

approaches and numerous competing partnerships and initiatives. WHO has been contested in its role as

the convening and leading health and development organisation.

From the discussions and papers on the development of the post MDG-framework, so far, it has generally

been accepted that health will form part of the new agenda. However, health may become a smaller part

of a broader development agenda relatively speaking, at least in regard to the number of goals. WHO has

suggested UHC as the overarching health goal, while others have suggested “Ensure healthy lives” . The

broader scope of the new goal (and targets) will make it even more obvious that horizontal, integrated

The UN’s High Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Agenda.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

health services are key to achieving results, leaving WHO with its focus on health systems strengthening

in a possibly stronger positions.

On the other hand, if WHO is not successful in its reform, and especially in ensuring full alignment

between agreed strategic objectives and resources, donors and partners might lose faith in WHO and its

leadership in global health. Health system strengthening has been one of the constantly underfunded

areas in recent years, and even though the budget for 2014-2015 has been increased, full funding is not

ensured. Other areas are also at risk for underfunding due to the large amount of earmarked voluntary

funding (approx. 75%).

The increasing opposition to the sensitive issues of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights might also

increasingly hamper WHO’s work. Not all countries support the inclusion of people whose sexual practices

may be socially unacceptable or even forbidden by national laws. In some countries the opposition to

inclusion is vocal, widespread and sometimes violent. Attempts to discuss discrimination in access to

health services based on gender identity and sexual orientation have so far not been very successful at

WHO board meetings and at WHA.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

4. Priority Results of Danish Support

The priority results defined for Denmark’s interaction with WHO are determined by the Strategy for

Denmark’s Development Assistance - The Right to a Better Life. The strategy emphasises that Denmark’s

overriding aim in international development cooperation is to fight poverty and promote human rights.

In accordance with the strategy, Denmark will place issues of human rights and access to social services

higher on the agenda in multilateral forums and be at the forefront of international efforts to promote

sexual and reproductive health and rights. Through a stronger multilateral engagement in social sectors,

Denmark will contribute to creating synergy, attracting new funding and thereby contributing more

effectively to raise the quality of social development and access to social services. Denmark will promote

the integration of a human rights-based approach in the multilateral organisations and actively fight the

growing political and religious pressure against sexual and reproductive health and rights.

In line with the Paris Declaration it is Denmark’s aim to concentrate efforts on furthering those objectives

of the organisation that provide the best fit with Denmark’s intentions. Within the six categories defined

in the General Programme of Work (see Annex 1) Denmark will focus on the following three categories:

Promoting health through the life course; Health systems and Corporate services and enabling functions.

More explicitly, Denmark will concentrate its work in WHO in the following four focus areas:

A. Continued Institutional Reform Process

WHO has taken on an extensive reform process to ensure that the organisation is ready to address the

increasingly complex challenges of health. The reform aims at improving the programmatic, governance

and management works of WHO, as defined at the 64

World Health Assembly and the Executive Board’s

129

session.

Improving strategic planning and resource coordination are key issues for Denmark. So far,

approximately 75% of the voluntary contributions to WHO have been earmarked specific programs often

not aligned with agreed overall priorities. This is obviously a major challenge for the organisation in the

implementation of the agreed strategic objectives, where some areas are constantly underfunded,

including Danish priority areas such as sexual and reproductive health, health systems strengthening and

the prevention and control of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). It undermines the organisations

efficiency, effectiveness and, thus, its ability to achieve the set goals. It also becomes a discouragement

for countries like Denmark who has made its voluntary contributions fully flexible (un-earmarked).

Denmark will support WHO’s efforts to ensure that income and expenditure are fully aligned with agreed

priorities and health needs of Member States, including by continued engagement in the new Financing

Dialogue. To facilitate this dialogue, WHO has developed a web portal which displays how the incoming

contributions are dedicated to different programme priorities and their according budget lines in 2014-

2015. The Web portal which is still being developed is a huge step in the right direction, including when it

comes to increasing the transparency. By March 2014, the web portal revealed that in total donors had

pledged to cover 75% the 2014-2015 budget (87% incl. projections). However, pledges were still

unevenly aligned to the agreed priorities.

B. Sustained Efforts to Fight Corruption and Managing Risks

The management reform also aims at improving transparency, accountability and risk management

across the organisation. To this end, WHO has established a new office for Compliance and Risk

Management and Ethics. Denmark will follow WHO’s efforts towards putting in place an organisation-wide

risk management framework, ensuring response plans in place for all corporate risks, developing a new

evaluation policy as well as the promotion of ethical behaviour and fairness. While cases of misuse occur,

the largest risk is perceived as programmatic risk. This is closely linked to the high ratio of voluntary,

earmarked contributions.

C. Strengthening of Health Systems

Strong health systems are the enablers for good health in countries and critical for well-functioning health

programmes. WHO has a key role in supporting countries to strengthening their health systems to ensure

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

increased and better access for the more than one billion people who can currently not obtain the health

services they need. All countries should have a comprehensive national health sector strategy with goals

and indicators. Furthermore regular reviews and evaluations are needed to ensure plans are successfully

implemented or updated if needed. Denmark considers Health System Strengthening the best way to

improve health for the poor in a sustainable way, and will support WHO’s efforts in this area.

D. Integrating Gender Equity and Human Rights

WHO has embarked on a synergistic approach as the basis for its institutional mainstreaming of gender,

equity and human rights. The aim is to increase intersectoral policy coordination and mainstreaming.

Denmark will follow WHO’s efforts to ensure that all WHO offices and programmes have integrated

gender, equity and human rights into routine strategic and operational planning, and put in place

evaluation processes to measure gender, equity and human rights in WHO programmes, including by

ensuring that more countries provide key health data., Denmark will encourage WHO to further

strengthen synergies between sexual and reproductive and other relevant programmes, including by

providing integrated policies and packages of interventions with maternal, new-born, child, and

adolescent health interventions and other public health programmes as well as by developing evidence

based norms, standards, and tools for scaling up equitable access to quality care services within a rights

and gender based framework.

Denmark’s Participation in the Work of WHO

Denmark will seek to maximise its influence in the above priority results areas also through bilateral

discussions with other like-minded members and constituencies. The on-going coordination between the

Nordic countries

and the EU member states and the EU-Delegation in Geneva will be key avenues for

Denmark’s efforts to influence the WHO-agenda. To this end, close coordination among national Danish

authorities involved in health matters as well as dialogue with Danish CSO and other non-state actors will

continuously be pursued.

Monitoring and Reporting

In accordance with the new multilateral guidelines

, Denmark will use WHO’s own monitoring and

reporting framework, including the financial reporting, and not produce specific Danish progress reports.

The indicator framework that forms part of WHO’s twelfth General Programme of Work contains seven

health impact goals and 30 outcome goals covering the six categories of the programme (see Annex 2).

Within this framework, the Mission will report on developments regarding the key priority results defined

in the present Organisation Strategy namely: A. Continued Institutional Reform Process; B. Sustained

Efforts to Fight Corruption and Manage Risk; C. Strengthening of Health Systems; and D. Integrating

Gender Equity and Human Rights.

This reporting will draw on WHO’s Annual Reports to the WHA and Executive Board. In addition, the

Mission will continue to report on thematic and other meetings as well as consultations in Geneva with

WHO within Danish priority areas and on relevant evaluations and assessments.

The Danish UN Mission in Geneva will carry out a mid-term review to assess progress in pursuing the

goals and the key priority results defined in the present organisation strategy as well as challenges,

development in risk factors, and possible needs for adjustment. The review should serve as quality

assurance of the monitoring of the relationship with WHO rather than an assessment of the performance

of the organisation.

WHO will report on their own mid-term review (of 2014-2015 programme and budget) in 2015, thus, the

Mission’s review will be carried out following this. The review should include input about WHO’s work at

country level from relevant Danish embassies. It will be distributed widely in the MFA and be sent for

information to the Council for Development Policy.

The Nordic countries have an informal constituency; currently none of the Nordic countries hold a seat in the EB.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs:

Guidelines. Management of Danish Multilateral Development Cooperation.

Copenhagen, December 2013.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

5. Preliminary budget overview

The budget allocated for the Danish contribution for WHO in the coming four years is shown in the table

below:

Table 1 Indicative budget for Denmark's engagement with WHO

Commitments in

DKK millions

Core funds

Earmarked funds

Totals

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

WHO is financed by assessed contributions payable by member states, and voluntary contributions

provided by Non-state and State actors, with USA, United Kingdom and Japan being the largest bilateral

contributors. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is currently the overall second largest contributor to WHO

and is expected to become the largest soon.

The Danish commitment amounted to DKK 80 million in 2012-2013, but has been lowered from 2014-

2015. Thus, the two-year Danish core commitment to WHO now amounts to DKK 60 million with an

annual disbursement of DKK 30 million. WHO’s proposed budget for 2014-2015 amounts to USD 3,977

million to be allocated to the six priority categories (Communicable diseases, Non-communicable

diseases, Promoting health throughout the life-course, Health systems, Preparedness, surveillance and

response plus Corporate services and enabling functions).

As mentioned, WHO’s income comes from both assessed contributions and voluntary contributions. The

Danish Ministry of Health pays the assessed contribution, currently amounting to 6.3 million USD for

2014-2015, a little less than in 2012-2013.

In 2013, Denmark ranked 19

largest contributor of voluntary funds for all member states and 37

largest voluntary contributor for all contributors (including Foundations, UN Agencies, etc.).

The numbers for 2015-2019 are preliminary and subject to parliamentary approval.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

6. Summary Results Matrix

In accordance with the Paris Declaration and subsequent international agreements on aid effectiveness

Denmark wishes to monitor the results of WHO’s work by using the organisation’s own Monitoring and

Evaluation Framework. In chapter 4 the priority results of Denmark’s support to WHO have been spelled

out; the present chapter displays a selection of those WHO indicators that are believed to be the best

match with the Danish priority results.

Danish Priority Result A: Continued Institutional Reform Process

Indicator

Financing and resource

allocation aligned with

priorities and health needs of

the Member States in a

results-based management

framework

Greater coherence in global

health, with WHO taking the

lead in enabling the many

different actors to play an

active and effective role in

contributing to the health of

all people

Target

100% alignment of income and

expenditure with approved

programme budget by

category and major office

Having at least high level of

satisfaction of stakeholders

with WHO’s leading role in

global health issues in

stakeholder survey 2015

Remarks

Baseline: not fully aligned

Baseline: High in 2012

stakeholder survey

Danish Priority Result B: Sustained Efforts to Fight Corruption and Manage Risk

Indicator

Target

Remarks

WHO operates in an

100% of corporate risks with

Baseline not applicable

accountable and transparent

response plans approved and

manner and has well-

implemented by 2015

functioning risk-management

and evaluation frameworks

Danish Priority Result C: Strengthened Health Systems

Indicator

Target

National health policies,

135 countries with a

strategies and plans

comprehensive national health

sector strategy with goals and

targets updated within the last

5 years by 2015

Health system, information

and evidence

112 countries reporting cause

of death information using the

International Classification of

Diseases, 10

revision by 2015

Remarks

Baseline (2013): 115 countries

Baseline (2013): 108

Danish Priority Result D: Gender equity and Human Rights

Indicator

Target

Remarks

Gender equity and human

Evaluation processes are in

rights integrated into the

place to ensure gender, equity

Secretariat’s and countries’

and human rights are measured

policies and programmes

in Secretariat programmes

Reproductive, maternal, new-

born, child and adolescent

health

320 million women using

contraception for family

planning in the 69 poorest

countries by 2015

Baseline: 260 million

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Annex 1

Danish priority results are placed within the categories highlighted in blue.

Table 2: The six priority categories for WHO's Program Budget 2014-2015