Færøudvalget 2014-15 (1. samling)
FÆU Alm.del Bilag 4
Offentligt
1510804_0001.png
BÚSKAPARRÁÐIÐ
Á vári
2015
Búskaparfrágreiðing
I.
II.
Konjunkturmeting
Fíggjarliga haldførið hjá almenna geiranum
Mars 2015
Economic report from the
Economic Council of the Faroe Islands,
Spring 2015, with Executive Summary in
English: (I) Economic outlook, and (II) a long-term projection with focus on the the sustainability of the
Faroese public sector finances.
Redegørelse fra det
Økonomiske Råd på Færøerne,
forår 2015: (I) Udsigterne for konjunkturudviklingen,
og (II) beregninger angående den langsigtede holdbarhed af den offentlige sektors finanser.
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
English Summary
Short Term Economic Outlook
Statistics Faroe Islands and The Economic Council have jointly evaluated
economic growth
in 2014 and
2015 and 2016. To facilitate the evaluations, an economic model developed by the former Faroese
Landsbankin and Statistics Faroe Islands was used. Statistics Faroe Islands has determined that
nominal economic growth for 2013 was 7.5%, which is somewhat higher than estimated (5.1%).
For 2014, nominal economic growth was projected to be 4.1% in current prices, and for 2015 the
estimate is 2.5%, and for 2016, growth is projected to be 2.2%. Wage payments according to the
national accounts are expected to grow by 3.7% in 2014, 2.5% in 2015 and 2.3% in 2016.
Aside from 2010, the trend since the financial crisis through and including 2012 showed little economic
growth, while at the same time the public sector accounts showed a large deficit, which in the main
derived from a deficit in the National Treasury (landskassin).
A shift was observed in the trend in the last half of 2013, when most key economic indicators revealed
a hint of growing economic activity and economic growth in current prices. Nevertheless, this did not
prove sufficient to turn the result in the National Treasury (landskassin) from a deficit to a surplus, but
there is a suggestion, however, of a declining deficit in the National Treasury.
What has sustained economic growth over the last few years especially is the price trend for exported
farmed salmon, the trend in exports in general, the trend in investment activity and the trend in private
consumption. It is believed that the growth in private consumption over a somewhat longer period of
time will be limited by low pension savings by the Faroese and the obligatory pension system, and that
this can contribute to limited economic growth. Given the current level of technology, there is also a
limit to how much the aquaculture industry can grow, and, with the current pelagic fisheries quota, the
catch is limited. A increasing part of the economic growth observed in the last few years stems from an
increase in capital earnings rather than in wages.
The growth in export prices reflects the export of farmed salmon over the last several years. Around
half of the growth in GDP in 2013 in current prices stems from the upward growth of the price of
farmed salmon. The price for farmed salmon grew as well in 2014, but perhaps not as much as in 2013.
The amount of farmed salmon was estimated to be exceptionally large in 2014, while it is believed that
there will be a small decline in 2015.
Growth in the export value of the pelagic fisheries, especially of mackerel, stems from increasing
catches because, among other things, the mackerel stocks have increased, and the Faroe Islands has
unilaterally set its own quota. In 2014, a new agreement was entered into among some of the coastal
states regarding mackerel. For the Faroe Islands, the agreement meant higher prices, but not a higher
quota compared to the years without an agreement. For the other pelagic fisheries, namely herring
and blue whiting, no agreement has been reached for 2015. It is anticipated that the quota for herring
will remain constant, while the quota for blue whiting could rise. In the end, it is expected that the
export value for 2015 will remain consistent with 2014.
Private consumption is a significant part of the economy; the level of private consumption in the Faroe
Islands is greater than the export of goods and services. The trend of private consumption, therefore,
has a major impact on economic growth. Private consumption is calculated at the same time as the
national accounts, but the latest updated figures on consumption are from 2013. For the period of time
after 2013, we have some indicators, including import figures, wage payments, VAT data and the data
from the Economic Confidence Survey conducted by the Ministry of Finance.
Changes for all imports in 2014, compared to 2013, reveal a decline of some 6.6%. Excluding ships and
airplanes, imports rose by 3.4%. For 2014, the import figures for immediate consumption show a
growth of 5.4%, which gives some indication of a growth in private consumption. The latest data on
wage payments shows an annual growth of 6%. The greatest growth is seen in the goods production
95
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
industry, which also includes the construction industry and shipyards, while there was lower growth in
public sector wage payments. Data on VAT payments to the National Treasury also points to an
increase in private consumption. The Consumer Confidence Survey of the Ministry of Finance for private
households indicates greater confidence than has been seen since the financial crisis. The data from the
confidence survey, together with import, wage and VAT figures, give an indication that there is growth
in consumption. The growth in private consumption in 2014 is estimated to be 7.6% and for 2015 it is
estimated to be 4%.
There has been little growth in
public sector consumption
since the financial crisis. The growth is
estimated to be 2.3% in 2014 and 1.9% in 2015. Data from 1999 indicate that changes in public sector
consumption is pro-cyclical – when there is much in the treasury, much is spent and vice-versa – and
this has exacerbated rather than mitigated the fluctuations in the economy. It is advisable that the
government not repeat the excessive spending policies adopted at the beginning of the 21
st
century and
in 2007 and 2008, if economic activity otherwise increases in the years ahead.
We see a significant growth in total
public sector investment
in 2014, compared to 2013. We anticipate
that the investment in 2015 and 2016 will lie at the same level as in 2014. The growth in public sector
investment from 2013 to 2014 especially stems from investment by the national government and not
from investment by the municipalities. The investment activities of the national government are
considerably impacted by the construction occurring at Marknagilsdepl [the new secondary education
building]. Municipal investment has remained steady since 2008, but had been growing exponentially
up to that time. Investment in the main stemmed from loans in the 1990s. Improvements in the fiscal
status of the municipalities also impacts investment interest.
Just as with public sector consumption, public sector investments are deemed to be pro-cyclical, both
for the national government and the municipalities. It is therefore advisable for the public sector here
again not to repeat the actions taken during 2007 and 2008, if economic activity otherwise grows in the
coming years. The debt ceiling of the municipalities – meaning that debt shall not exceed the yearly
taxes assessed – does not necessarily encourage systematic planning of fiscal policy that encompasses
all public investment.
The deficits in all the
public sector accounts
have been large over the last several years and in the main
stems only from a deficit in the National Treasury. It is estimated that the net operational deficit of the
National Treasury for 2014 will be around DKK 230 million. Net assets of the public sector accounts
were around DKK 2.5 billion in 2007, but will be close to zero in 2014.
English Summary
Fiscal Sustainability
For the first time ever, The Economic Council undertook a fiscal sustainability analysis of the Faroese
economy. For this purpose, the Council created an economic model to calculate the fiscal consequences
of demographic changes and economic policy changes. This model enables a projection of public sector
expenses and revenue as well as GDP. The calculations are based on a projection of population size and
composition. Further, a financial formula is used to calculate present value as well as the fiscal
sustainability indicator, which indicates, in a single number, the fiscal sustainability of the public sector
economy.
The basis year for the calculations is 2012. This means that the projections of public sector revenue and
expenses is based on the public sector expenses and revenue in 2012, as compiled in the statistical
accounting data maintained by Statistics Faroe Islands of the public sector accounts. Projections were
made through 2051.
Positive fiscal sustainability means that the anticipated future public sector revenue at the very least
should cover future public sector expenses. If not, the level of fiscal sustainability is insufficient and
such situations customarily require intervention through politically-driven economic policy initiatives.
96
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1510804_0004.png
Most all countries in Western Europe and the Western World conduct regular calculations of their
respective annual fiscal sustainability as a required element of forging public economic policy. It is
anticipated that in the future this will be done in the Faroe Islands as well. The main reason for this
interest is the demographic changes that lie ahead, and also the financial crisis.
Of course, there is always a certain amount of uncertainty associated with such calculations. In
essence, the goal of the calculations is simply an attempt to ascertain and pull together all the relevant
trends. For the Faroe Islands, some conditions are more explicit than others, e.g., the age distribution
of the elderly part of the population, and that GDP and public sector revenue and expenses are
conditioned on age distribution.
There is a presumption that the demographic situation in the Faroe Islands is more distorted relative to
age distribution than found in those countries with which we normally compare ourselves. The Table
below shows the historical trend and projections from 2013 for the older age groups in the Faroe
Islands.
Population of older age groups 1990 - 2050
Year
1990
1995
2000
2010
Over 70
3728
4159
4397
4864
Over 80
1074
1267
1510
1939
Source: Statistics Faroe Islands
2013
5475
2091
2020
6669
2267
2025
7488
2778
2035
2045
2050
9257 10173 10158
3860
4819
5150
GDP projections were based on 2013 data (provisional figures from the last audited public sector
accounts). Projections to 2051 are based on an assumed average annual price index increase of
1.75%, and an average annual growth in productivity of 1.5%. Otherwise, the calculations (present
value calculations) are based on an assumed average nominal interest rate of 4.75% for the period.
The fiscal sustainability calculations are based upon, among other things, how much each person on
average in each annual age band costs in 2012 for certain public expenses (individual public
consumption and individual public financial transfers). For each year forward to 2051, projections are
made for these expense groupings [age bands], based on assumptions about the yearly average price
index increase, as well as real growth, which corresponds to assumed growth in productivity (grounded
in the bases referenced above). The projections are made by multiplying the projected number of
people in each age band every year forward by how much each person on average in each annual age
band costs, where the costs are adjusted for assumed price index increases and assumed real growth,
corresponding to growth in productivity.
For non-age-specific (collective) public services and public sector consumption, the projections are
made based on projected growth in the population; also in this regard here again the cost is adjusted
for price index increases and a real growth that corresponds to growth in productivity.
For investment, the projections are formulated as a percentage of projected GDP (historical average
figures for the year 1998 – 2012 are used).
For almost all of the public revenue, the projections are formulated as a percentage of projected GDP
(historical average figures from the years 1998 – 2012 are used). For the Block Grant and other Danish
revenue support to the Faroe Islands, the projections are based on available Danish P/W figures. (i.e.,
price and wage index used by the Danish government)
Special attention has been focused on the calculations of public revenue under the old pension scheme
(with deferred tax) and the new pension scheme (with advanced tax). Changing from a deferred tax
scheme to an advanced tax scheme does not in and of itself affect fiscal sustainability (i.e., the
calculated fiscal sustainability indicator), but the consequences of this change could, on the other hand,
97
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
easily worsen liquidity, if there occurs an adverse impact on the result of the public sector accounts
over time.
By basing our projected expense calculations on the assumption that real grow is equal to growth in
productivity, we also submit to the assumption that productivity growth has a neutral impact on fiscal
sustainability. Growth in productivity results in growth in GDP and public revenue. However, public
expenses have historically been seen to grow concomitant with growth in public revenue. The real
growth in public sector wages and services has in the long-term corresponded to growth in productivity.
Thus, historical experience demonstrates that growth in productivity and the economy does not in and
of themselves shelter fiscal sustainability – weak fiscal sustainability reflects disturbances or disruptions
in the economic structure. On the other hand, growth in productivity does occasionally protect jobs by
strengthening commercial competitiveness, and thereby indirectly strengthening the fiscal sustainability
of the public sector. But this type of impact, however, cannot be inserted into the computer model
being used. As with productivity growth, price index increases are also assumed in the calculations to
have a neutral impact on fiscal sustainability.
The following assumptions regarding “quality aging” were used in the projections for the three expense
line items listed below under the Ministry of Health (HMR) and the Ministry of Social Services (AMR):
-
Consumption under “10.2 old age services”, which encompasses home help, nursing homes and
retirement homes (under AMR);
-
Consumption under “7 health services” (under HMR)
-
Financial transfers provided under “7 health services” (under HMR).
These assumptions are incorporated into the economic model in the following manner: Beginning with
the 35-year-old age group, the 2012 expenses for each person are moved one year forward for each 5-
year age band. This means, for example, that a 99-year-old in 2018 would cost the equivalent of what
was provided to a 98-year-old in 2012. The assumption regarding “quality aging” is based on
experience from our neighbouring countries. Impact consequence analyses have shown that this
assumption or element in economic calculations has a major impact on the calculated fiscal
sustainability.
The graph below shows the result of a consequence calculation using the fiscal sustainability model
wherein the assumptions used by the Council are considered realistic, and also are deemed to be
essentially consistent with the policies articulated by the broad political majority. The assumptions on
quality aging are incorporated. Also incorporated into the model’s calculations is the assumption that
the price index and/or real growth adjustments would not be integrated into the national pension
scheme in the future. The base pension rate has not been adjusted since 1999, although the
supplemental rate has been adjusted. For 2015, no adjustment was made to the early retirement
pension scheme, etc., but in our projections we have, however, indexed these for price increases and
real growth.
The result of this consequence calculation is a fiscal sustainability indicator of minus five. This means
that a long-term tightening of fiscal policy, which in DKK equates to -5% of GDP, is necessary in order
to ensure that the net debt/asset of the public sector accounts as a percentage of GDP will remain the
same at the end of the projection period as at the beginning, i.e., unchanged. In 2015, 5% of GDP
equals around DKK 750 million (5% of DKK 15 billion).
The graph below shows how this result is derived. As depicted, expenses grow from revenue. One trend
that is evident from the graph below is prevented in and of itself because of extreme growth in debt.
Apart from this, we believe that the trend identified is correct, i.e., if no other economic policy
measures are enacted, or if nothing totally unexpected occurs.
98
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1510804_0006.png
Revenue and Expenses in percent of GDP 1998 - 2051
66%
64%
62%
Revenue
Expences
% of GDP
60%
58%
56%
54%
52%
50%
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2020
2022
2024
2026
2038
2040
2042
2044
1998
2000
2012
2014
2016
2018
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
2046
2048
S o urc e :
Calculatio n o f sustainablity. Fo r 1
998 -201 , data are actual balances, while fo r 201
1
2-2051(pro jected) data are primary balances (less interest)
The result also shows a growing deficit as a percentage of GDP.
Results of annual accounts in percent of GDP 1998-2015
15%
10%
5%
% of GDP
0%
-5%
-10%
-15%
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2022
2038
2040
2042
2044
2046
2050
2048
S o urc e :
Calculatio n o f sustainablity. Fo r 1
998 -201 , data are actual balances, while fo r 201
1
2-2051(pro jected) data are primary balances (less interest)
This graphic representation shows quite clearly that there is considerable pressure on expenses;
demographic changes push expenses upward as a percentage of GDP, and revenue as a percentage of
GDP cannot withstand this pressure.
It is possible that rationalization efforts within the public sector could lead to reduced expenses; in the
first instance, this will cost jobs. To “offload” expenses from the public sector was the principal goal of
the new pension scheme. Given the lack of data, The Economic Council cannot determine if and when
this might become an actuality. Otherwise, major and/or drastic reductions in expenses could easily
result in the level of public services, public financial transfers, and also the basis for investments falling
well under the level found in our neighbouring countries. Such radical cuts could also set into motion a
vicious cycle of a declining economy and growing emigration.
To increase tax revenue and other related fee/surcharge revenue through the pressure of tightening tax
measures can have the same impact on the economy as the cutting of expenses. It is possible,
however, to impact both the revenue side and the expense side of the public sector accounts by making
the pension age more upwardly flexible, consistent with the trend in “quality aging”. At the same time,
99
2050
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2024
2026
2028
2030
2032
2034
2036
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
the government could broaden its tax and revenue basis. In this regard, we refer the reader, for
example, to the analysis of resource rent in The Economic Council’s report from the autumn of 2014.
Given the desire to assure a level of welfare that does not decline much below that provided in our
neighbouring countries, the problems with fiscal sustainability referenced above can be explained by
the fact that we will in future have too few working-age employees and too few competitive jobs for
them – we will lack both people and jobs. Therefore, the revenue trend will be what it is shown to be.
In conclusion, The Economic Council believes, however, that it is possible to safeguard public sector
fiscal sustainability in the Faroe Islands. In large measure, the question is dependent on political will
and political choice.
100