Udenrigsudvalget 2013-14, Klima-, Energi- og Bygningsudvalget 2013-14
URU Alm.del Bilag 13, KEB Alm.del Bilag 31
Offentligt
1292311_0001.png
1292311_0002.png
1292311_0003.png
1292311_0004.png
1292311_0005.png
1292311_0006.png
1292311_0007.png
1292311_0008.png
1292311_0009.png
1292311_0010.png
1292311_0011.png
1292311_0012.png
1292311_0013.png
1292311_0014.png
1292311_0015.png
1292311_0016.png
1292311_0017.png
1292311_0018.png
1292311_0019.png
1292311_0020.png
1292311_0021.png
1292311_0022.png
1292311_0023.png
1292311_0024.png
1292311_0025.png
1292311_0026.png
1292311_0027.png
1292311_0028.png
1292311_0029.png
1292311_0030.png
1292311_0031.png
1292311_0032.png
1292311_0033.png
1292311_0034.png
1292311_0035.png
1292311_0036.png
1292311_0037.png
1292311_0038.png
1292311_0039.png
1292311_0040.png
1292311_0041.png
1292311_0042.png
1292311_0043.png
1292311_0044.png
1292311_0045.png
1292311_0046.png
1292311_0047.png
1292311_0048.png
1292311_0049.png
1292311_0050.png
1292311_0051.png
1292311_0052.png
1292311_0053.png
1292311_0054.png
1292311_0055.png
1292311_0056.png
1292311_0057.png
1292311_0058.png
1292311_0059.png
1292311_0060.png
1292311_0061.png
1292311_0062.png
1292311_0063.png
1292311_0064.png
1292311_0065.png
1292311_0066.png
1292311_0067.png
1292311_0068.png
1292311_0069.png
1292311_0070.png
1292311_0071.png
1292311_0072.png
1292311_0073.png
1292311_0074.png
1292311_0075.png
1292311_0076.png
1292311_0077.png
1292311_0078.png
1292311_0079.png
1292311_0080.png
1292311_0081.png
1292311_0082.png
1292311_0083.png
1292311_0084.png
1292311_0085.png
1292311_0086.png
1292311_0087.png
1292311_0088.png
1292311_0089.png
1292311_0090.png
1292311_0091.png
1292311_0092.png
1292311_0093.png
1292311_0094.png
1292311_0095.png
1292311_0096.png
1292311_0097.png
1292311_0098.png
1292311_0099.png
1292311_0100.png
1292311_0101.png
1292311_0102.png
1292311_0103.png
1292311_0104.png
1292311_0105.png
1292311_0106.png
1292311_0107.png
1292311_0108.png

Danish Ministry of Foreign

Affairs

Technical Advisory Services

Support to Global Green Growth

Institute

Appraisal Note

February 2011

File No: 104.G.13.

Table of Contents

1. Background Page 1
2. Assessment of the PreparationProcess Page 2
3. Assessment of the GGGIProgramme Page 4
4. Organisational Assessment ofGGGI Page 9
5. Risks and Assumptions11
Page
6. Summary of Conclusions andRecommendations Page 12

1. Background

current global business-as-usualeconomic development needed anoverhaul. The calls for a greenereconomy and growth, whichprovides economic, as well as socialand environmental benefits, hasbeen voiced from the traditionalenvironmental think tanks, NGOs,and international organizations, butalso from OECD, G20 governments,and from the private sector.
Figure 1: Overview developed in thecontext of Poverty EnvironmentPartnership
can be interpreted in variousdirections, from involving acomprehensive transformativechange of the economy to agreening of specific parts of thegrowth model e.g. introducing newgreener technologies, as can be seenfrom the figure 1, above.
them is: What’s in it (green growth)for the poor (people and countries)?However, “south” includes bothemerging economies/middle incomecountries which are alreadysubstantial green house gas emitters,as well as the least developedcountries, many of them located inAfrica. Thus, interest in greeneconomy and growth varies evenamong countries in the “south”.
not entirely clear what output theConference will have (it is unlikelythat it will agree on one and onlydefinition of the concept) it isplausible that it will lead to andfurther strengthen numerousinternational and national greeneconomy and growth initiatives andprocesses.
A few important stakeholders,supported by Danida, are alreadyvery active in the run-up to RIO+20:
UNEP programme, PovertyEnvironment Initiative, works atcountry level with integration andmainstreaming of poverty-environment in national policy andplanning processes, thereby alsodealing with greening of economies.PEI is particularly strong in Africa,but also engaged elsewhere.
companies such as Phillips. Itdebates and gathers experiences,conducts advocacy work, andconvenes a number of regional andnational dialogues e.g. in Brasil,involving the national NGO andbusiness communities, as well asgovernment institutions.

2. Assessment of the Preparation

Process

2.1 History of the Global GreenGrowth Institute
perhaps also gives an indication as towhat kind of green growth isenvisaged to be promoted throughGGGI. On August 15, 2008, KoreanPresident Lee Myung-bak launchedthe national vision and initiativelabeled “Low Carbon, GreenGrowth” aiming at:
towards low energy input (frommanufacturing to knowledge-intensive), increasing energyefficiency and abolishing low energyefficient household articles (target ofimproving energy efficiency by 46%by 2030);
renewable energy sources, nuclearpower and low carbon eco-friendlyinfrastructure (target of 11% energyfrom renewable energy sources by2030 from 2.5% today); and
growth engine by investing in greentechnology R&D, promoting greenindustries and by establishing adomestic carbon market.
dependence, but more ambitiouslyputs the Republic of Korea on theinternational agenda as an exampleof a country voluntarily introducingambitious targets for greenhouse gasemissions and promoting greentechnology as a growth strategy bothat national and international level.
June 2010, initially with Koreanfunding of USD 10 million per yearfor three years. A part from SouthKorea’s own green growth thinking,inspiration to the GGGI concepthas been sought from amongstothers, the ClimateWorksFoundation and McKinsey &Company.
as an international organisation in2012. More funding is required toestablish GGGI as an effectiveorganisation, and a minimum ofthree countries is required toestablish GGGI as an internationalorganisation. Although this is notsecured at the time of the appraisal,it seems likely that it will be possibleto include at least one additionalpartner in 2011 (cf. section 3.4).
4.1 Institutional Capacity of GGGI
The high profile of GGGI alsoincreases the stakes and may entailsome risk as GGGI may becomestalled if political disagreementshould occur among GGGI partnerswhen putting ideas into practice. Theappealing headlines of green growthhave attracted a diverse set ofpartners and donors to GGGI, andthe success of the initiative dependson their continued alliance towards
Advisory Council should beestablished, but this body is notmentioned in the ComponentDocument and has probably not yetbeen established. The AdvisoryCouncil represents a goodopportunity to establish allianceswith other important organisationsor individuals in this field and usethe existing experience.
Recommendation 6:
the establishment of a GGGI the advisorycouncil to be used actively for strategicguidance in order for GGGI to profit fromexisting experience in this crucial start-upphase.
work related to climate, sustainabledevelopment and growth. Donors toGGGI who contribute with aminimum of UAD 5 millionannually will also become membersof the Board. This seems toconstitute a solid basis for thefurther development of theorganisation.
with a relatively narrow scope ofinterventions as indicated in section3.2 above. However, at this stage, aconvincing case has not yet beenpresented in regards to the addedvalue from GGGI to contributing tofor instance sustainable forestry inBrazil and Indonesia who have hadthese issues on the agenda fordecades. As noted above, it seemsthat further reflection is needed on
recruitment process is on-going. Thestaffing level of the regional officesis unknown, but their role will be tooverlook the collaboration efforts inthe region and liaise withprogramme activities. In eachprogramme country, GGGIactivities will be implementedthrough an open architecture ofpartners in collaboration withnational authorities. The
Recommendation 7:
in terms of number of partner countries inthe first years, and consider selecting clusterof countries where economies of scale andcross-fertilization of experience can beobtained.
4.3 Management and AdministrativeProcedures