Retsudvalget 2013-14
REU Alm.del Bilag 408
Offentligt
1405394_0001.png
Drug legislation in the Member States
of the European Union
Brendan Hughes
Lisbon, 22 September 2014
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0002.png
Outline…
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Definitions
Laws – the text
Laws – the practice
Laws – the effects
Legalisation regimes
[email protected]
2
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0003.png
Legal terms applied to drug control
Offence level
Criminal, punished
Depenalisation
Decriminalisation
Criminal, not
punished (case
closed)
Non-criminal
offence
Legalisation
Prohibited
Permitted
Not an offence, in
defined
circumstances
Regulation
Not an offence,
generally
Free market
Users
Suppliers
[email protected]
3
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0004.png
According to those countries, why…?
…decriminalise?
Concentrate resources on
more serious crimes
Reduce judicial system
backlog / prison population
Encourage entry to
treatment
Bring law and practice
closer
Proportionate response
…legalise?
Concentrate resources on
more serious crimes
Reduce judicial system
backlog / prison population
Separate the markets
Regulate visible trade
(away from OCGs)
Gain tax revenue for
healthcare, education,
prevention.
…Reasons of efficiency and/or effectiveness
[email protected]
4
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0005.png
Drug use / consumption –
an offence? (DRAFT)
Criminal offence (8)
Non-criminal
offence (6)
Not an offence (16)
(ELDD Topic Overview – Illegal Consumption)
5
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0006.png
Possession of drugs for personal use (minor
offences): possibility of imprisonment in laws
(ELDD Topic
Overview –
Illegal Possession:
Annual Report
2011, Fig 2
Since 1/2013:
Croatia)
[email protected]
6
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0007.png
Does the penalty vary by drug?
(ELDD Topic Overview –
Classification: EDR 2013, Fig 4.2)
[email protected]
7
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0008.png
Cannabis supply penalties
(EU Drug Markets Report 2013)
8
8
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0009.png
Sentence type – personal use offences
EMCDDA Selected Issue Sentencing, 2009
9
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0010.png
Sentence type – supply offences
10
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0011.png
DRAFT Supply penalties estimates (2014)
(from approx 5 practitioners per country [DK:7])
?
Months in prison
11
11
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0012.png
DRAFT Supply penalties estimates (2014)
(from approx 5 practitioners per country [DK:7])
?
Months in prison
12
12
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0013.png
Do changes in legal sanctions result in
observable changes in cannabis use rates?
With many caveats,
the best available
evidence shows no
clear impact of
penalty changes on
cannabis use.
(EMCDDA Annual
Report 2011, Ch.3)
[email protected]
13
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0014.png
Legalisation regimes – brief comparison
Netherlands
Level of law
National
prosecutor
guidelines
Municipality
Washington
State
State law
(conflict with
federal law)
Washington
State Liquor
Control Board
21
Not allowed
Colorado State
State constitution
(conflict with
federal law)
Colorado
Department of
Revenue
21
Up to six plants,
three in flower
(cannot be sold)
1 oz (28.5 g)
Uruguay
National law
Regulatory
Body
Age limit for
possession
Growing at
home
18
National
Cannabis
Institute
18
Up to six
plants / 480 g
40 g
Up to five
plants if for
own use
Maximum
5 g (limit for
amount
investigation)
permitted for
30 g (limit for
possession
prosecution)
1 oz (28.5 g)
EMCDDA Perspectives on Drugs (2014)
Models for the legal supply of cannabis: recent developments
[email protected]
14
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1405394_0015.png
Thank you for listening – any questions?
Brendan Hughes
emcdda.europa.eu
twitter.com/emcdda
facebook.com/emcdda
youtube.com/emcddatube
flickr.com/photos/emcdda