PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

Retsudvalget 2013-14
REU Alm.del Bilag 382
Offentligt

CPT/Inf (2014) 25

Report

to the Danish Government

on the visit to Denmark

carried out by the European Committee

for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman

or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT)

from 4 to 13 February 2014

The Danish Government has requested the publication of this report.

Strasbourg, 17 September 2014

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

-2-

CONTENTS

Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report ........................................................................... 5

Executive summary ............................................................................................................................ 6

II.

INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 9

Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation.............................................................. 9

Establishments visited ............................................................................................................ 10

Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered ................................ 11

National Preventive Mechanism............................................................................................ 12

FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED .............................. 13

Law enforcement agencies ..................................................................................................... 13

Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 13

Ill-treatment ..................................................................................................................... 13

Safeguards against ill-treatment ...................................................................................... 15

notification of custody ........................................................................................... 15

access to a lawyer .................................................................................................. 16

access to a doctor ................................................................................................... 16

information on rights ............................................................................................. 17

Conditions of detention ................................................................................................... 17

Independent Police Complaints Authority ...................................................................... 18

Prison establishments ............................................................................................................. 20

Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 20

Ill-treatment ..................................................................................................................... 21

Prisoners subject to special regimes ................................................................................ 24

Conditions of detention ................................................................................................... 28

Aarhus and Odense Remand Prisons ..................................................................... 28

Ringe State Prison.................................................................................................. 29

Western Prison ....................................................................................................... 29

juveniles in prison .................................................................................................. 30

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

-3-

Health-care services ........................................................................................................ 32

health-care staffing ................................................................................................ 32

medical screening and confidentiality ................................................................... 33

substance misuse .................................................................................................... 35

Prison Hospital at Western Prison ......................................................................... 36

Other issues ..................................................................................................................... 37

reception and induction.......................................................................................... 37

prison staff ............................................................................................................. 38

discipline ................................................................................................................ 39

security-related issues ............................................................................................ 40

contact with the outside world ............................................................................... 45

complaints and inspections .................................................................................... 45

Foreign nationals held under aliens legislation.................................................................... 47

Secure institutions for juveniles ............................................................................................ 51

Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 51

Ill-treatment ..................................................................................................................... 52

Living conditions ............................................................................................................ 53

Health care ...................................................................................................................... 54

Other issues ..................................................................................................................... 56

admission ............................................................................................................... 56

staff ........................................................................................................................ 57

security and use of force ........................................................................................ 57

contact with the outside world ............................................................................... 60

complaints and inspections .................................................................................... 61

Psychiatric institutions ........................................................................................................... 63

Preliminary remarks ........................................................................................................ 63

Ill-treatment ..................................................................................................................... 64

Staff ................................................................................................................................. 67

Patients’ living conditions ............................................................................................... 69

Treatment ........................................................................................................................ 70

Special restraint measures at the Secure Department of Nykøbing Sjælland Psychiatric

Hospital (Sikringen) ........................................................................................................ 72

Safeguards ....................................................................................................................... 74

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

-4-

APPENDIX

List of the national authorities and non-governmental organisations

met by the CPT’s delegation .................................................................................................. 76

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

-5-

Copy of the letter transmitting the CPT’s report

Mr Martin Bang

Head of Section

Human Rights Unit

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Asiatisk

Plads 2

1418 Copenhagen K

Denmark

Strasbourg, 17 July 2014

Dear Mr Bang,

In pursuance of Article 10, paragraph 1, of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture

and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, I have the honour to enclose herewith the

report drawn up by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or

Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) following its visit to Denmark from 4 to 13 February

2014. The report was adopted by the CPT at its 84

meeting, held from 7 to 11 July 2014.

The various recommendations, comments and requests for information formulated by the CPT are

highlighted in bold in the body of the report. As regards more particularly the CPT’s

recommendations, having regard to Article 10 of the Convention, the Committee requests the

Danish authorities to provide within

six months

a response giving a full account of action taken to

implement them.

The CPT trusts that it will also be possible for the Danish authorities to provide, in the above-

mentioned response, reactions to the comments and requests for information formulated in this

report.

I am at your entire disposal if you have any questions concerning either the CPT’s report or the

future procedure.

Yours sincerely,

Lәtif Hüseynov

President of the European Committee for the

Prevention of Torture and Inhuman

or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

-6-

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The CPT’s fifth periodic visit to Denmark was an opportunity to review the implementation of

recommendations made by the Committee during previous visits. To this end, the delegation

examined the treatment of persons detained by the police and of inmates in several prison

establishments, as well as of young persons held in two secure institutions for juveniles. In addition,

three psychiatric establishments were visited, with a particular focus on the use of coercive

measures on patients. A targeted follow-up visit to Ellebæk immigration detention centre was also

carried out. The cooperation received by the Danish authorities was of an excellent standard.

Nevertheless, the principle of cooperation also requires that decisive action be taken to improve the

situation in the light of the CPT’s key recommendations, and. the findings of the 2014 visit suggest

that such action has not been taken since the 2008 visit as regards the imposition of judicial

restrictions on remand prisoners, the practice of the use of fixation in prisons and prolonged

application of mechanical restraints on psychiatric patients.

Policing

Most detained persons met by the CPT’s delegation stated that they had been treated correctly by

the police. Some allegations of excessive use of force at the moment of apprehension and of tight

handcuffing were received and the Danish authorities are asked to remind police officers to use no

more force than is strictly necessary. The Committee welcomes the establishment of the

Independent Police Complaints Authority to investigate complaints of police ill-treatment and to

fight against impunity. In this connection, the CPT recommends that all police officers should wear

an identity number or name badge for identification purposes. Several recommendations are also

made to strengthen the safeguards afforded to persons deprived of their liberty by the police,

notably as concerns the right of detained persons to be granted effective access to a lawyer as from

the very outset of custody. In addition, persons should be provided with clear information in a

language they can understand about their rights in police custody. Material conditions in the police

stations visited were generally satisfactory for short periods of detention.

Prisons

Relations between staff and inmates in the establishments visited were generally correct and no

allegations of deliberate ill-treatment were received. The CPT was concerned about the inter-

prisoner violence, intimidation and sexual exploitation at Ringe State Prison, and recommends a

comprehensive anti-bully strategy be put in place, and that proactive measures be taken to prevent

sexual exploitation of female prisoners.

The CPT welcomes the downward trend in the resort to solitary confinement of remand prisoners

by court order. As for the practice of judicial restrictions on remand prisoners’ contacts with the

outside world, the Committee recommends that the safeguards surrounding the application of this

measure be reinforced, especially the longer the measure lasts. Recommendations are also made to

review the placement policy at Copenhagen Police Headquarters Prison and to improve association

possibilities for all prisoners in this establishment. The report also addresses the situation of a

particular inmate in long-term administrative segregation currently held at Vridsløselille Prison, and

makes recommendations concerning the treatment of such prisoners.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

-7-

The conditions of detention in the prisons visited were generally satisfactory although Western

Prison requires a rolling programme of upgrading. Numerous complaints were, however, received

from prisoners concerning access to the toilet, particularly at night.

Prisoners generally had access to health-care services within a reasonable time and staffing levels

were mostly adequate in the establishments visited. However, there is a need to ensure all inmates

are properly interviewed and physically examined by health-care staff within 24 hours of admission

to prison. Further, medical confidentiality, particularly at Western Prison, needs to be strengthened

and additional action taken to tackle substance abuse in prisons.

The delegation’s findings that prisoners often relied on other inmates to tell them about the regime

and rules reinforce the CPT’s recommendation to introduce a comprehensive reception and

induction process in remand prisons, with prisoners provided with information in a language that

they can understand. The importance of the role of staff in prisons and of investing in their training

is emphasised, notably as concerns inter-personal communication. The appointment of a dedicated

foreign national prison officer at Western Prison is proposed.

The delegation found that the disciplinary procedure is properly applied. Nevertheless, the CPT

recommends that the legal provisions on discipline be revised to bring them into line with the

Committee’s position (i.e. that solitary confinement as a disciplinary punishment should not exceed

14 days). As regards security-related issues, the CPT recommends that the application of pepper

spray in prisons and the use of observation cells, both for prisoners at risk of suicide or self-harm

and for prisoners who are disruptive or violent, be reviewed. Further, the CPT is again critical of the

application of the measure of immobilisation in prisons and recommends that steps be taken to

ensure that the principles and minimum safeguards set out by the Committee are applied rigorously.

Contacts with the outside world for prisoners are generally good. However, the prisoner complaints

system should be reviewed to provide prisoners with confidence in its effectiveness and

management with a clearer indication of the issues which can be raised.

Foreign nationals held under aliens legislation at Ellebæk

The main concerns at Ellebæk relate to the need to maintain the establishment in a decent state of

repair, to limit the carceral environment to a minimum and to ensure regular activities are offered.

Further, the CPT recommends that all newly-arrived detainees are clinically assessed and that a

specific screening be put in place aimed at identifying victims of torture. There is also a need to

improve communication with the detainees and to enhance their contacts with the outside world.

Juveniles

Juveniles at Grenen and Sølager Secure Institutions for Juveniles were accommodated in well-

staffed small living units and relations between staff and the young persons were positive. No

allegations of ill-treatment were received by the CPT’s delegation. Nevertheless, the Committee

remains concerned that the majority of juveniles on remand had judicial restrictions placed on their

contacts with the outside world, often for extensive periods. The Committee reiterates its

recommendation that the imposition of such limitations should be the exception, not the rule.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

-8-

The delegation found that, at “Grenen”, juveniles were usually confined to their rooms upon

admission to the institution for up to a week or longer before being permitted to associate with the

rest of the group. The CPT recommends that the period of such a confinement – if needed at all –

should be as short as possible and always based on an individual assessment. Further, human

contact and at least one hour of outdoor exercise per day should be offered to all juveniles subject to

this measure.

At both secure institutions, the Committee noted positively the offer of a wide range of structured

activities and a pedagogical approach aimed at promoting a sense of community as well as very

good material conditions. On the other hand, the CPT considers that all newly admitted juveniles

should be medically assessed upon admission by a health-care professional. It also recommends that

the presence of at least one female staff member should be assured at “Grenen” whenever female

juveniles are being accommodated.

As regards juveniles in prison, the CPT recommends that the Danish authorities review the policy of

placing juveniles remanded in custody pending trial in a prison establishment rather than a secure

institution for juveniles. It further proposes that sentenced juveniles might be located on the grounds

of an open prison accommodating juveniles as opposed to the current arrangement of being placed

in a small unit within Ringe State Prison.

Psychiatry

The CPT welcomes the constructive attitude and the overall acknowledgement, both by the central

authorities and the staff in the hospitals visited, of the need to reduce the resort to physical

immobilisation of patients to a bed (fiksering). However, it remains seriously concerned that resort

to immobilisation, and notably immobilisation lasting longer than 48 hours, had reached all-time

peaks in 2012 and 2013 and that in several cases patients had been immobilised for periods from

one to three months. Recommendations are also put forward to enhance the range and frequency of

therapeutic and recreational activities available to patients and to ensure that – health permitting –

all of them are offered at least one hour of outdoor exercise per day.

The CPT examined the special coercive measure of “walking-restraint” at the Secure Department of

Nykøbing Sjælland Psychiatric Hospital, which had been legalised in 2010, and it found that the

measure was applied with appropriate supervision and outside monitoring and as much respect for

the patient’s dignity as possible. Nevertheless, the CPT stresses that the utmost care should be taken

to ensure that “walking-restraint” is only applied to patients whose condition requires restraint and

that the measure should be ended as soon as it is no longer necessary. The CPT’s delegation also

found that patients were locked in their rooms for extensive periods of the day at this special

department and the Committee recommends that resort to this measure be radically reduced.

The CPT considers that most of the shortcomings found in the three psychiatric hospitals visited,

including resort to frequent and prolonged use of restraint, are at least partly due to low staffing

levels. It calls upon the Danish authorities to reinforce staffing levels in these three hospitals, and

notably the number of nurses. As regards safeguards surrounding the involuntary placement of

patients in a psychiatric hospital, the CPT reiterates its recommendation that the retention of a

voluntary admitted patient requires the opinion of a second, independent doctor.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

-9-

INTRODUCTION

Dates of the visit and composition of the delegation

In pursuance of Article 7 of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and

Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"), a

delegation of the CPT carried out a visit to Denmark from 4 to 13 February 2014. The visit formed

part of the Committee’s programme of periodic visits for 2014, and was the CPT’s fifth periodic

visit to Denmark.

The visit was carried out by the following members of the CPT:

Wolfgang HEINZ, Head of delegation (German)

Maria José GARCIA GALAN SAN MIGUEL (Spanish)

Andrés MAGNUSSON (Icelander)

Ivan MIFSUD (Maltese)

Jari PIRJOLA (Finnish).

They were supported by Hugh CHETWYND (Head of Division) and Almut SCHRÖDER of

the CPT's Secretariat, and assisted by:

Jane FOWLER, medical doctor, Dorset Health Care University Foundation Trust,

United Kingdom (expert),

Pétur HAUKSSON, psychiatrist, former head of the psychiatric department at

Reykjalundur Rehabilitation Center, Iceland (expert),

Mette AARSLEW (interpreter),

Jørgen ENGRAF (interpreter),

Heidi FLEGAL (interpreter),

Jan Als JOHANSEN (interpreter),

Annette LASSEN (interpreter),

Deborah J. SHIELDS (interpreter),

Anna ZOEGA (interpreter).

The CPT’s previous visits to Denmark took place in December 1990, September/October 1996,

January/February 2002, and February 2008. A visit to Greenland took also place in September 2012. The

reports on those visits have been published, together with the responses of the Danish Government, and may be

found on the Committee’s website (http://www.cpt.coe.int).

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 10 -

Establishments visited

The delegation visited the following places:

Police establishments

- Aarhus Police Headquarters

- Odense Police Headquarters

- Bellahøj Police Station, Copenhagen

- City Police Station, Copenhagen

- Roskilde Police Headquarters

Prisons

- Western Prison (Vestre

Faengsel),

Copenhagen

- Copenhagen Police Headquarters Prison (Politigårdens

Faengsel)

- Aarhus Remand Prison (Arresthuset)

- Odense Remand Prison (Arresthuset)

- Ringe State Prison

- Vridsløselille Prison (targeted visit to high-security section A1)

Establishments for the detention of minors and juveniles

- Secure Institution for Juveniles Sølager, Hundested and Skibby

- Secure Institution for Juveniles Grenen, Grenaa

Establishments for the detention of foreign nationals

- Ellebæk (formerly “Sandholm”) Prison and Probation Establishment for Asylum-seekers and

Others Deprived of their Liberty

Psychiatric establishments

- Psychiatric Centre Amager, Copenhagen

- Nykøbing Sjælland Psychiatric Hospital

- Mental Health Centre Sct. Hans, Roskilde

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 11 -

Consultations held by the delegation and co-operation encountered

The delegation had consultations with Jesper ZWISLER, Permanent Secretary of State of

the Ministry of Children, Gender Equality, Integration and Social Affairs, Kim LUNDING, Deputy

Permanent Secretary of the State Ministry of Justice, Johan REIMANN, Director-General, Danish

Prison and Probation Service and Vagn NIELSEN, Director of the Danish Health and Medicine

Authority.

The delegation also met Kirsten DYRMAN, Director of the Independent Police Complaints

Authority. Further, it held meetings with representatives of the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the

Danish Institute of Human Rights and members of non-governmental organisations active in areas

of concern to the CPT.

A list of the national authorities and organisations met by the delegation is set out in the

Appendix to this report.

The co-operation received by the CPT’s delegation throughout the visit, from both the

national authorities and staff at the establishments visited was of an excellent standard. The

Committee’s delegation enjoyed rapid access to all the places visited (including ones not notified in

advance) and was able to speak in private with persons deprived of their liberty, in compliance with

the provisions of the Convention. Further, it was provided with all the necessary documentation,

and additional requests for information made during the visit were promptly met. In this context, the

CPT wishes to express its appreciation for the assistance provided to its delegation both during and

after the visit by the various liaison officers designated by the Danish authorities.

However, the principle of co-operation set out in Article 3 of the Convention is not limited

to steps taken to facilitate the task of a visiting delegation. It also requires that decisive action be

taken to improve the situation in the light of the Committee’s key recommendations. The

delegation’s findings during the 2014 visit suggest that such action has not been taken in certain

areas which have given rise to serious concerns by the CPT in the past, in particular as regards the

imposition of judicial restrictions on remand prisoners, the practice of the use of fixation in prisons

and the prolonged application of mechanical restraints on psychiatric patients.

The CPT trusts that the Danish authorities will make continued efforts to improve the

situation in the light of the Committee’s recommendations, in accordance with the principle of

co-operation which lies at the heart of the Convention.

At the end of the visit, the CPT’s delegation provided the Danish authorities with its

preliminary remarks on the findings of the visit. By letter of 4 June 2014, the Danish authorities

provided a response to the various matters raised by the delegation which has been taken into

account in the relevant sections of the report.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 12 -

National Preventive Mechanism

Denmark ratified the Optional Protocol to the United Nations Convention against Torture

(OPCAT) in June 2004 and the Parliamentary Ombudsman was designated as the National

Preventive Mechanism (NPM) in 2007. Two years later, the Parliamentary Ombudsman concluded

agreements with both the Danish Institute of Human Rights and DIGNITY (formerly the

Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims), aimed at strengthening the Ombudsman’s

monitoring activities by involving civil society organisations. The Parliamentary Ombudsman’s

budget was increased to cover its NPM activities and DIGNITY has been provided with specific

funding for the medical expertise it provides for monitoring visits. The management from the three

institutions meet at few times a year to discuss and plan the overall guidelines for the work while

each institution has appointed staff members to carry out the core work under the coordination of

the Parliamentary Ombudsman’s Office.

The NPM has taken a thematic approach to its monitoring activities: for example, focusing

on children and juveniles deprived of their liberty in 2011; prison establishments in 2012, drug

abuse and continuity of care between prison and the community and prevention of violence in 2013;

and psychiatric problems and suicide prevention in prison will be the themes for 2014. The NPM

also monitors approximately 15 return flights every year.

As regards the working methodology, the NPM has decided to no longer draft reports

following each monitoring visit but rather to raise any concerns directly with the management of the

institution concerned orally and in the form of a letter. In case of more serious concerns, for

instance, degrading treatment or illegal use of physical force, the Parliamentary Ombudsman raises

the matter with the relevant authorities and may issue written criticism and recommendations to the

institutions and the responsible authorities. The outcomes of the monitoring visits have been

compiled in the annual NPM report, the latest one being the 2012 report which was completed on

23 December 2013.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 13 -

II.

FACTS FOUND DURING THE VISIT AND ACTION PROPOSED

Law enforcement agencies

Preliminary remarks

The legal provisions governing the detention of criminal suspects by the police have been

summarised in the CPT reports on the 2002 and 2008 visits.

In brief, a detained criminal suspect must be brought before a judge within 24 hours and the

judge may extend police custody for a further 72 hours.

However, as was the case at the time of the

2008 visit, in practice police custody tended to be for short periods (usually not longer than

eight hours) and criminal suspects detained overnight tended to be accommodated in the local

remand prison. It is also recalled that the 2005 Police Act stipulates the powers of the police in

general and regulates police activities in cases other than criminal prosecution. Pursuant to this Act,

the police may administratively detain for a maximum of six hours a person who endangers public

order, peace and security.

The power to administratively detain persons was extended to 12 hours for public gatherings

and crowds and has been used on several occasions by the police to preventively detain groups of

persons. During the 2009 Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen some 1,900 persons were

detained pre-emptively and following a series of complaints regarding

inter alia

their conditions of

detention, in December 2010 the Copenhagen Municipal Court ruled that the manner in which the

persons were detained was a breach of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Further cases where this power was used concerned demonstrations in Copenhagen on 18 May 2011

and in Aarhus on 31 March 2012.

The CPT would like to be informed of the steps taken by the Danish authorities to

ensure that all persons preventively detained by the police are held in appropriate conditions.

Ill-treatment

Most of the persons met by the CPT’s delegation in the course of the 2014 visit who were,

or had recently been, detained by the police stated that they had been treated correctly both at the

time of apprehension and during questioning. However, a number of persons complained of

excessive use of force at the time of apprehension, usually after they had been placed on the ground

and/or handcuffed. One person alleged that police officers had beaten him with truncheons and used

pepper spray when he was arrested driving a stolen vehicle; staff at Aarhus Remand Prison recalled

this person being “bruised all over” and his medical records noted “pronounced bruising after

violent arrest. Sutures to temporal area. Left eye swollen and red.” However, there was no

information about any follow-up or of the case having been reported to the Independent Police

Complaints Authority.

See CPT/Inf (2002) 18, paragraph 6 and CPT/Inf (2008) 26, paragraph 7.

See Article 71 of the Danish Constitution and Section 760 of the Administration of Justice (Consolidation)

Act.

See Sections 5(3), 8(3) and 9(3) of the Police Act (Act No. 444 of 9 June 2004).

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 14 -

Several persons also complained of tight handcuffing which had apparently left their fingers

numb, and in two cases the delegation could still observe the reddish marks around the wrists that

had been left by the handcuffs respectively three and seven days earlier. In addition, a few persons

who had been bitten and held by a police dog alleged that the dog handler had been deliberately

slow to call off the dog once the person concerned had been brought under control.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities remind police officers that they

should use no more force than is strictly necessary when carrying out an arrest and that

where it is deemed essential to handcuff a person, the handcuffs are under no circumstances

excessively tight and are applied only for as long as is strictly necessary.

See also paragraph 108

concerning the handcuffing of juveniles during transport.

10.

The CPT has consistently advocated that all complaints or other indications of ill-treatment

should be thoroughly investigated and any perpetrators appropriately punished. In this respect, it

welcomes the establishment of the Independent Police Complaints Authority (see section 5 below).

Nevertheless, it considers that the Danish authorities need to reinforce the message that torture and

inhuman or degrading treatment have no place within the police, military and other law

enforcement agencies. To this end, torture should not only constitute an aggravating circumstance

but be a specific criminal offence in the Criminal Code. Defining and criminalising the crime of

torture is central to fighting impunity, which is one of the root causes of the widespread practice of

torture. The CPT concurs with the UN Committee against Torture that the importance of naming

and defining the offence of torture in accordance with Articles 1 and 4 of the United Nations

Convention against Torture or Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment as

distinct from other crimes will directly advance the overarching aim of preventing torture, inter alia

by alerting everyone to the specific gravity of the crime of torture and by improving the deterrent

effect of the prohibition itself.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities incorporate torture as a specific

offence under national criminal law.

11.

Further, in the fight against impunity and to enhance the accountability and professionalism

of the police, the CPT considers that all police officers should wear an identity number tag (or a

name badge) on their uniform or clothing. In the course of the 2014 visit, the CPT’s delegation was

informed that a number of investigations into allegations of ill-treatment by police officers had to be

closed because the police officers in question could not be identified. The current arrangement of a

police officer having to identify him/herself if requested is not sufficient; at a minimum, all police

officers, including those from the anti-riot and other specialised units, must wear an identity number

which will permit the police hierarchy and prosecutors to identify an officer if required. Further, the

concerns of the Danish authorities that police officers will be specifically targeted if they can be

identified appears exaggerated when examining experiences from most other European countries

where law enforcement officials are obliged to wear some form of identification on their uniforms

or clothing. Moreover, the experience of prison officers in Denmark wearing identification badges

militates against such an argument.

The CPT recommends that all police officers wear an identity number or name badge

for identification purposes.

See UNCAT concluding observations of 16 July 2007 - CAT/C/DNK/CO/5, paragraph 10.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 15 -

Safeguards against ill-treatment

12.

In the course of this visit, the CPT’s delegation reviewed the safeguards afforded to persons

deprived of their liberty by the police; namely, the rights of such persons to inform a close relative

or another third party of their choice of their situation, to have access to a lawyer, and to have

access to a doctor. It also examined whether such persons were informed without delay of all their

rights and whether the custody records were properly filled out.

It is recalled that Ministry of Justice

Circular no. 9155 of 18 March 2010 sets out detailed rules

and procedures to be followed by the police with regard to the rights of detained persons. Further, the

Danish authorities in their response to the 2008 visit report reiterated that the Circular is binding on

police officers, who may be subject to disciplinary sanctions for non-compliance with its provisions.

notification of custody

13.

Section 2(2) of the above-mentioned Circular of 18 march 2010 provides that all persons

detained by the police have the right to inform their relatives or other relevant persons of their

arrest. However, pursuant to Section 2(3) of the Circular, the detained person can be denied this

right temporarily or definitely, if, due to the specific circumstances of the case, information about

the arrest may in itself compromise the investigation. The decision to delay or deny the detained

person his/her right to inform, or to have his/her relatives or other relevant persons informed of the

arrest is made by the officer on duty or by the officer in charge of the investigation. Any decision to

delay or deny such notification must be recorded in the detention report or protocol (see Section

2(6) of the Circular).

The CPT recognises that the exercise of the right of notification might have to be made

subject to certain exceptions, in order to protect the legitimate interests of the police investigation.

However, such exceptions should be clearly defined in law and strictly limited in time, and resort to

them should be accompanied by appropriate safeguards (for example, any delay in notification of

custody should be recorded in writing with the reasons therefor, and require the approval of a senior

police officer unconnected with the case or a prosecutor). At present, the power to delay notification

of custody is neither clearly defined nor strictly limited in time, and resort to that power does not

appear to be accompanied by the above-mentioned safeguards.

The CPT recommends that

appropriate measures be adopted to remedy these deficiencies.

14.

In the course of the 2014 visit, a number of persons detained by the police who were

interviewed by the CPT’s delegation complained that they had not been permitted to contact their

relatives, and that it was not possible to verify from police detention records whether notification of

custody had taken place. All detained persons should be provided with feedback on whether it has

been possible to contact their family or a third person.

The CPT reiterates its recommendation that the Danish authorities ensure that all

persons detained by the police are able, in practice, to enjoy the right to inform a relative or a

third party of their choice, of their situation as from the very outset of their deprivation of

liberty. Further, such notification should be properly recorded and detained persons provided

with feedback on whether a member of their family or third person was contacted.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 16 -

access to a lawyer

15.

As the CPT has stated in the past, its objective of guaranteeing an effective right of access to

a lawyer during police custody is not primarily linked to issues of due process or the right to a fair

trial; it is aimed at preventing ill-treatment. In the CPT’s experience, it is during the period

immediately following the deprivation of liberty that the risk of intimidation and ill-treatment is at

its greatest.

It follows that to be effective as a safeguard against ill-treatment, access to a lawyer must be

guaranteed as from the very outset of deprivation of liberty. The right of access to a lawyer must

include the right to talk to him/her in private; the detained person should also, in principle, be

entitled to have the lawyer present during any interview with the police.

16.

Danish law provides for the right of access to a lawyer upon deprivation of liberty by the

police and includes inter alia the right to have a lawyer present during questioning and to consult

with a lawyer in private.

Access to a lawyer should in principle be granted as soon as a detained

person is brought to a police station.

However, in the course of the 2014 visit, a number of detained

persons with whom the CPT’s delegation met stated that they had not been informed of their right

to meet a lawyer at the police station and in a few cases that their requests to contact a lawyer and

have him/her present during questioning had not been granted. No explanations were provided.

Once again, the majority of the detained persons interviewed by the delegation indicated that the

first time they had met a lawyer was in court, a few minutes before the application of the measure of

remand custody was decided. Moreover, there was no clear record of whether a detained person had

requested to see a lawyer and whether such a request was granted. In addition, police stations did

not always possess a list of ex officio lawyers whom a detained person could consult.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take the necessary steps to ensure

that the right of all detained persons to have access to a lawyer is effective

in practice

as from

the very outset of custody. Further, it recommends that, in association with the Bar

Association, a list of ex officio lawyers which detained persons can consult be compiled for

each police station. In addition, a record should be maintained of any request by a detained

person to see a lawyer and whether such a request was granted.

access to a doctor

17.

The CPT’s delegation received no complaints regarding access to a doctor in the context of

detention by the police. However, it was informed about a survey carried out by The Street

Lawyers

of 50 drug users who had been detained by the police and who alleged that they had been

denied access to medical care while in police custody. It is alleged that the lack of treatment for

their withdrawal symptoms had a negative impact on the way in which they answered questions

during police interviews, including false confessions.

The CPT would appreciate the comments

of the Danish authorities on this matter.

See Sections 730 and 745C of the Administration of Justice Act and Section 3(3) of the Ministry of Justice

Circular

No.9155 of 18 March 2010.

See Sections 2(2) and 3(1) of the Ministry of Justice Circular No. 9155 of 18 March 2010.

A non-governmental organisation that provides legal aid services to vulnerable and marginalised groups in

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 17 -

Further, the Committee considers that the reporting of injuries should be improved. Where a

doctor noted down injuries to a detained person in police custody, there was no description of the

circumstances under which the injury occurred. It appeared that the detained person was not asked

to explain the circumstances of the injury and the doctor was under no obligation to elicit an

explanation of the injuries and to record whether or not the injuries were consistent with the version

provided by the detained person. There was also no apparent reporting procedure by which doctors

could formally alert senior police officers or the Independent Police Complaints Authority about

any injuries which were consistent with allegations of excessive use of force or ill-treatment.

The

CPT recommends that steps be taken to put in place a proper reporting system for all such

injuries recorded by doctors of persons in police custody

(see also paragraph 52).

information on rights

18.

In the course of the 2014 visit, a number of detained persons with whom the CPT’s

delegation met stated that they had not been informed of their rights or that they had not been

informed of their rights in a language they could understand. The information sheet, “Guidelines for

persons under arrest”, was not systematically provided to every person detained by the police.

In the Danish authorities’ response to the report on the 2008 visit, they had reiterated that

“

pursuant to Section 1(2) of Circular no. 12154 of 12 June 2001, persons detained by the police must be

informed of their rights as set out in the circular” and that “observance of this requirement must be

recorded in the detention report or protocol, cf. Section 1(3)”.

The CPT recommends that steps be taken to ensure that all persons detained by the police

are systematically informed of their rights, orally at time of deprivation liberty and through the

provision of an information sheet, in a language they can understand, upon detention at the police

station. Further, consideration should be given to a specific record being maintained of the fact

that detained persons have been provided with information on their rights; detained persons

should be asked to certify with their signature that such information has been provided and, if

necessary, the absence of a signature in a given case should be explained.

Conditions of detention

19.

The material conditions in all the police stations visited were, on the whole, satisfactory for

short periods of detention. The detention cells for administrative detainees (usually intoxicated

persons) and the holding cells for criminal suspects were between 6m² and 8m² and were designed

for single-occupancy use. Persons were never held for longer than six hours at Aarhus and Odense

Police Stations and even in the Copenhagen police stations, where the periods of detention could be

longer, if a person had to be detained overnight he or she would be transferred to the local remand

prison.

Denmark such as drug users, street-based sex workers, homeless and undocumented migrants.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 18 -

The main deficiency observed was a lack of access to natural light and insufficient artificial

lighting in the cells in the stations visited, which made reading difficult. The delegation, also

received complaints from persons recently detained in police stations who had not been offered

anything to eat despite being held there for several hours. Indeed, at the Copenhagen City Police

Station and Roskilde Police Station, the delegation was informed that detained persons were only

offered a meal after having been detained for eight hours. The CPT considers that all detained

persons should be offered something to eat at appropriate times during the day.

The CPT

recommends that steps be taken to remedy these deficiencies.

Independent Police Complaints Authority

20.

On 6 April 2010, an amendment (Chapter 11a) to the Administration of Justice Act was

adopted establishing an Independent Police Complaints Authority

(Den Uafhængige

Politiklagemyndighed).

The Authority is tasked with handling complaints concerning the conduct of

police personnel and investigating criminal offences committed by police personnel while on duty

as well as cases concerning the death or injury of persons in police custody. It started operating on

1 January 2012.

The Authority initiates an investigation either upon the receipt of a complaint or on its own

initiative, and it is required to initiate an investigation where a person has died or been seriously

injured as a result of a police intervention or if the person in question was in police custody.

Whenever a complaint is filed with the police or the prosecutor’s office, it will be forwarded to the

Authority.

When the Authority has finished its investigation in criminal cases involving police

personnel, the Authority will forward the case to the regional public prosecutor, who then decides

whether a prosecution should be brought. The regional public prosecutor’s decision in respect of

prosecution may be appealed by either party to the case, or by the Authority, to the Director of

Public Prosecutions.

21.

The Independent Police Complaints Authority is headed by a Police Complaints Council

(Politiklageråd), composed of a high court judge (who heads the Council), a private practising

attorney, a professor of law and two representatives of the general public.

At the time of the visit, the staff of the Authority consisted of some 25 persons; the Director

(a former public prosecutor for 25 years), eight investigators, 11 lawyers from various professional

backgrounds and support personnel. The eight investigators were former police officers, each of

whom had more than 20 years of professional experience and who had left the police to join the

Authority. There had been an internal debate concerning the perceived independence of these

investigators but on balance it was concluded that it was more important for the Authority to

demonstrate its professional competence in carrying out investigations and to build up its trust with

both the public and the police through its actions. However, the Authority plans in the future to

recruit young professionals from outside the police and to train them in carrying out investigations,

drawing on the expertise of their current staff.

The CPT would be interested to learn more about the Independent Police Complaints

Authority’s plans to recruit and train young professionals as investigators.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 19 -

22.

The Authority handles all aspects of inquiries and investigations, and has the power to

subpoena witnesses, request a forensic examination and arrest suspects. However, the police

themselves may deal with urgent matters concerning inquiries and investigations, such as securing a

murder scene and obtaining a list of witnesses. In addition, the Authority may request the National

Police to provide assistance with its investigations. Certain complaints may be resolved directly by

the police through the complainant speaking with a senior officer at a police station but such a

resolution is only possible with the agreement of the complainant. And, the Independent Police

Complaints Authority will always be informed of the complaint and may decide to initiate an

investigation into any case. For misconduct cases, the Authority must complete the investigation

within six months and forward its findings to the Commissioner of the National Police who is

responsible for instituting any disciplinary measures. At the time of the visit, the Director of the

Authority informed the CPT’s delegation that all cases were completed within this deadline and that

as far as the Authority could tell, the measures instituted by the Police Commissioner had been

proportionate. For criminal cases, the investigation should be completed and a decision by the

regional prosecutor to prosecute or not taken within 12 months. These deadlines were generally met

although in complex cases there was a possibility for an extension.

23.

During its first year of operation, the Authority received 1919 cases of which 886 were

criminal in nature, 726 were complaints about the conduct of police officers and 307 were classified

as “other” (i.e. administrative cases that did not fall within its mandate). In 2013, there were 893

criminal cases, 653 complaints about conduct and 552 other cases, bringing the total to 2098 cases.

Roughly 50% of the criminal cases in both years concerned traffic offences. As regards those cases

falling under paragraph 1020a, Section 2, of the Administration of Justice Act, which involves

death or serious injury as a result of police action or which occurred while a person was in police

custody, there were 21 such cases in 2012 and 16 in 2013.

At the time of the visit, the CPT’s delegation was informed that there had only been one

case where the Director of Public Prosecutions had upheld a decision of a regional prosecutor not to

pursue a case despite the Authority considering that sufficient evidence existed for prosecution.

Nevertheless, there has been some criticism of the Authority for not pursuing police officers

accused of having ill-treated a detained person with sufficient speed. This perception was reinforced

by a television interview of a lawyer representing police officers who stated that his clients always

had plenty of time to corroborate their stories with each other before being interviewed by the

Independent Police Complaints Authority.

24.

In sum, the Independent Police Complaints Authority has the necessary powers and

sufficient resources to carry out effective investigations into cases of alleged ill-treatment by police

officers; to this end, a few cases have been brought to trial. The CPT encourages the Authority to

continue to develop its good practices in investigating allegations of ill-treatment. It also welcomes

the proposed review of the operation of the Authority in 2015 as a means to further enhance its

effectiveness as well as an opportunity for its critics to air their concerns constructively.

The CPT trusts that the Danish authorities will continue to provide the Independent

Police Complaints Authority with the necessary resources to carry out its functions

effectively. It would like to be informed about the nature and, in due course, the outcome of

the above-mentioned review into the Authority.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 20 -

Prison establishments

Preliminary remarks

25.

At the time of the visit, the Danish prison system was holding 3,849 prisoners

for an overall

capacity of 4,184 in a total of 57 establishments. The CPT’s delegation was informed that the aim

of the Danish Prison and Probation Service was to operate the prisons at 94% capacity within three

years, increasing existing occupancy levels by 2%. However, these overall figures mask the fact

that certain establishments were already operating at the limits of their capacity or even beyond. For

example, the six closed prisons were operating at 99% occupancy level (888 inmates for a capacity

of 895) and the Copenhagen Prisons at 102% (568 prisoners for a capacity of 557). Further, it

should be recalled that even with an occupancy level of 95% of the total design capacity of a prison

estate, it becomes nigh impossible for a prison service to deliver what is required of it

and, more

particularly, to ensure respect for inmates’ human dignity.

In the period since the 2008 visit, the Danish authorities have expanded the use of electronic

monitoring and the use of alternatives and the overall prison population has increased by some 200

persons in six years. However, the number of prisoners on remand remained high, standing at

33.8% of the overall prison population in September 2013. In this respect, the CPT’s delegation was

informed that there was a conscious policy by the public prosecutor’s office to address this question

and that the numbers on remand were decreasing.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take the necessary steps to ensure

that all prisons operate within their design capacity and that they pursue their efforts to

manage the prison population, taking due account of the relevant Recommendations of the

Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in this area, in particular: Recommendation

No. R(99)22 concerning prison overcrowding and prison population inflation; and

Recommendation Rec(2006)13 on the use of remand in custody.

26.

In the course of the 2014 visit, the CPT’s delegation visited for the first time Ringe State

Prison and the remand prisons in Aarhus and Odense. It also carried out follow-up visits to Western

Prison and Copenhagen Police Headquarters Prison and paid a targeted visit to Vridsløselille

Prison.

Ringe State Prison, located outside Odense, was built in 1976 and accommodates young

sentenced men aged up to 24 years’ old from throughout Denmark and sentenced men under the age

of 29 from the region. It is also the only closed prison for sentenced women and juveniles. At the

time of the visit, the establishment was holding 84 persons (68 men, 15 women and one juvenile) in

seven single-storey accommodation units.

Denmark’s prison population rate is 73 per 100,000 inhabitants.

For example, to maintain safety through possessing sufficient bed capacity to accommodate prisoners

according to different categories or to separate inmates in case of conflict.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 21 -

Aarhus and Odense Remand Prisons, built in the 19

century, are both centrally located

adjoining their respective city court house. At the time of the visit, Aarhus Remand Prison was

holding 55 men, four women and one male juvenile for a capacity of 66 persons and Odense

Remand Prison was accommodating 42 men and five women for a capacity of 68. The buildings of

both prisons were somewhat dilapidated.

Western Prison, built in 1895 and enlarged in 1918, is a cross-shaped building with four

accommodation blocks each consisting of four floors;

Nord, Syd

and

Ost

held male prisoners while

the upper two floors of

Vest

accommodated female prisoners. The two-storey hospital wing had 36

cells and took prisoners from all over the country. Each wing had its own exercise yard. The

establishment primarily houses persons remanded in custody (awaiting trial or sentencing) as well

as some short-term prisoners and irregular migrants awaiting deportation. At the time of the visit,

the prison was holding 447 prisoners for an official capacity of 446; of these, 413 were male and 34

female and some 95% of the inmate population was on remand.

The Police Headquarters Prison in Copenhagen,

originally built in 1924, was refurbished

specifically to accommodate “negatively strong” inmates (see paragraph 28 below). The

establishment re-opened in October 2004 with a capacity of 25 prisoners, and at the time of the visit

was accommodating 21 persons.

Ill-treatment

27.

The CPT’s delegation heard no allegations of deliberate physical

ill-treatment

of prisoners

by staff in the prisons visited. Indeed, the delegation found that relations between staff and inmates

in the various prison establishments visited were generally correct and many prisoners spoke

positively about the way in which staff acted.

However, a few prisoners made allegations of excessive use of force by prison staff at the

Western Prison and Copenhagen Police Headquarters Prison, usually in the context of an altercation

between an inmate and a prison officer, and one foreign national alleged that he had been punched

by a prison officer on the left side of the chest at Western Prison, the day prior to the delegation’s

visit, for not taking off his clothes when requested.

The CPT recommends that prison officers at Western Prison and Copenhagen Police

Headquarters Prison be reminded that no more force than is strictly necessary should be used

to control prisoners and that there can be no justification for striking a prisoner after he or

she has been brought under control or for physically assaulting a prisoner who refuses to obey

an order.

Copenhagen Police Headquarters Prison, Western Prison and Blegdamsvejen Prison together make up the

Copenhagen Prisons and fall under the same Director. Ellebaek Establishment for Asylum-seekers and Others

Deprived of their Liberty also comes under the Director of the Copenhagen Prisons.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 22 -

28.

Tackling

inter-prisoner violence and intimidation

has been a priority of the Danish Prison

and Probation Service for many years and the CPT has commented on this question in previous visit

reports.

The most notable measure taken was the establishment of special units for “negatively

strong” inmates, as a response to organised groups of criminals seen to be exerting a highly

negative influence on other prisoners, as well as units for prisoners seeking protection from other

inmates (vulnerable prisoners) and high-security units for dangerous/disruptive prisoners. At the

time of the visit, there were some 380 “negatively strong” prisoners. Nevertheless, it was

acknowledged that not all gang members or “negatively strong” inmates were accommodated in

small units.

In the course of the 2014 visit, the delegation noted that inter-prisoner violence and

intimidation was not a problem in the remand prisons visited or at Copenhagen Police Headquarters

Prison. Further, at Western Prison, staff generally intervened effectively whenever problems arose,

although the case of one prisoner who alleged he had been roughed up and threatened by other

prisoners in the exercise yard the day prior to the delegation’s visit had not been picked up by staff.

29.

The CPT’s delegation did however have reason to be concerned about inter-prisoner

violence and intimidation at Ringe State Prison. Several serious assaults by prisoners on other

prisoners had taken place in recent times; health-care staff reported that there were fights most

weeks and that they were sure that not all injuries were being picked up. Some of the more

prominent incidents included:

a prisoner had boiling water thrown over his head while asleep in his room. He required

hospital treatment and sustained 1

and 2

degree burns to his face, according to

hospital records;

a prisoner assaulted by other inmates required hospital admission after sustaining a left-

sided orbital fracture (confirmed by the hospital discharge letter) and a broken nose.

a prisoner was assaulted by other inmates and had an electrical current passed through

him, resulting in him losing consciousness. He was apparently subsequently bound,

hooded and threatened with sexual assault. The prisoner in question had suffered a

previous attack four days earlier;

a prisoner received multiple kicks and slaps from two other inmates during an assault.

Medical records showed bruising and marks on his shoulders, the back of the neck and

his skull, and there was a sustained laceration on his scalp;

one prisoner sustained a head trauma during an attack, and a subsequent MRI scan

showed diffuse axonal injury with a significant effect on communication and mobility.

A medical prognosis stated that he may not regain his previous level of functioning;

a prisoner was assaulted by three other inmates who entered her room while she was

lying on her bed, placed a pillow over her head and one of them forcibly inserted her

hand into the vagina of the prisoner to search for drugs.

In the course of the delegation’s visit, a number of inmates from different sections told the

delegation that they did not feel safe. Moreover, prisoners considered that staff were playing too

passive a role in asserting their authority and in ensuring that bullying and inter-prisoner violence

did not occur. This was particularly the case in the male accommodation Wings 1, 3, and 4 of the

prison. Some prisoners also attempted to exploit racial (white/coloured) and religious

(Christian/Muslim) differences between Danish prisoners as well as with foreign national prisoners.

See, inter alia, CPT/Inf (2008) 26, paragraph 29 and CPT/Inf (2002) 18, paragraphs 32 to 35.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 23 -

30.

The CPT recognises the challenge of striking a balance between prisoners' privacy and their

supervision, and between prisoner choice and regime restrictions. Nevertheless, the duty of care

which is owed by the prison authorities to prisoners in their charge includes the responsibility to

protect them from other prisoners who might wish to cause them harm. While the concept of

“normalcy” advocated at Ringe Prison allows prisoners a great deal of autonomy in their lives, its

application cannot come at the expense of the safety of inmates. The changing profile of the inmate

population, including the acceptance into the establishment of certain gang members, means that the

prison management has to adapt its approach accordingly.

Addressing inter-prisoner violence and intimidation requires that prison staff be alert to

signs of trouble and both resolved and properly trained to intervene when necessary. The existence

of positive relations between staff and prisoners, based on the notions of dynamic security and care,

is a decisive factor in this context; this will depend in large measure on staff possessing appropriate

interpersonal communication skills. Such skills are all the more important in the context of a prison

population with more than 50% of foreign nationals. Both initial and ongoing training programmes

for staff of all grades must address the issue of managing inter-prisoner violence. It was clear to the

CPT’s delegation that a more proactive approach by prison staff needed to be adopted at Ringe

State Prison to crack down on bullying and to build up the confidence of inmates in the staff’s

commitment to act to eradicate all forms of intimidation. By letter of 4 June 2014, the Danish

authorities informed the CPT that action was being undertaken at Ringe Prison to reduce the

number of incidents of violence and bullying through a better management of the movement of

inmates around the establishment and a zero-tolerance stance towards inmates behaving violently.

This represents a step in the right direction.

The CPT nevertheless recommends that further steps be taken to put into place a

comprehensive anti-bullying strategy to reduce the incidence of inter-prisoner violence and

intimidation at Ringe State Prison, taking into consideration the above remarks.

31.

At Ringe State Prison, male and female prisoners interact and Wing 5 accommodated both

men and women prisoners. In the course of the visit, the delegation received detailed allegations

from both male and female prisoners, who were or had been accommodated in Wing 5, that women

prisoners were vulnerable to being exploited such as having to provide sexual favours to male

prisoners in order to obtain drugs. The prison management had been aware of some exhibitionism in

the past and had erected hedges in yards separating the wings to prevent prisoners from one wing

seeing prisoners in an adjacent wing. However, they did not consider that sexual exploitation was

an ongoing problem.

Permitting male and female prisoners to share an accommodation unit represents the goal of

the “normalcy” concept in promoting conditions of living that approximate as far as possible those

in the community, with prisoners taking responsibility for their own lives. This is a laudable

approach and Ringe State Prison is applying this concept in an admirable manner. Nevertheless,

there is a necessity to re-evaluate the allocation procedures for assigning both male and female

prisoners to Wing 5 and to put in place a more rigorous supervision of relations between the

inmates on this wing. At times, it may be necessary to conclude that there are no female inmates

who meet the criteria for being placed in this wing. In addition, the prison management must be

attentive to sexual exploitation in other areas of the prison where male and female prisoners come

into contact.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take proactive measures to prevent

sexual exploitation of prisoners at Ringe Prison, notably as concerns those prisoners allocated

to the mixed male and female wing.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 24 -

32.

More generally, the CPT considers that the Danish authorities need to put in place a more

rigorous reporting system of all incidents of inter-prisoner violence as at present it would appear

that prison officers and health-care staff are not noting down all occurrences. Consequently, there is

also a lack of action to identify and address acts of violence, intimidation and bullying. It also

means that the statistics on inter-prisoner violence produced by the Department of Prisons and

Probation are most likely not an accurate reflection of the situation in prisons.

The CPT recommends that a more rigorous approach towards combating inter-

prisoner violence in prisons be put in place, which should include a systematic recording and

reporting of all such incidents. Reference should also be made to an effective complaints

system (see paragraph 73 below).

Prisoners subject to special regimes

33.

The issue of solitary confinement of remand prisoners by court order in the interest of the

investigation has been an integral part of the ongoing dialogue between the CPT and the Danish

authorities. In the report on the 2008 visit, the CPT took stock of the amendments introduced to the

Administration of Justice Act and their impact in reducing recourse to this measure.

According to information provided by the Danish authorities, there has been a downward

trend in the total number of solitary confinements of remand prisoners since the 2008 visit (from

273 in 2008 to 132 in 2012

and a significant decrease to 57 in 2013). The average duration of such

measures has also continued to diminish; in 2013, eight persons were held for longer than 28 days

and no persons were held for more than eight weeks. Further, the delegation noted the efforts being

made at Western Prison to diversify the restrictive regime applied to these prisoners by providing

them with increased staff contact, access to individual tuition and other activities (e.g. gym, library,

work in the cell).

The CPT welcomes the continued progress made by the Danish authorities and

recommends that they pursue their efforts to ensure that remand prisoners are only placed in

solitary confinement in exceptional circumstances which are strictly limited to the actual

requirements of the case and last no longer than is absolutely necessary. Further, the

Committee recommends that the authorities pursue their efforts to counteract the negative

effects of remand prisoners placed in judicially-imposed solitary confinement.

The 2012 statistics show a progressive decrease in incidents of inter-prisoner violence from 353 in 2010 to 295

in 2012.

Apart from a spike in 2009, when there were 327 cases of court-ordered solitary confinement.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 25 -

34.

In previous visit reports, the CPT expressed strong reservations about the practice of judicial

restrictions on remand prisoners’ contacts with the outside world (notably as concerns supervised

visits, withholding or monitoring of correspondence, and prohibition of telephone calls). The

Committee made several recommendations designed to ensure that the adoption of such measures,

known as “B&B” (Brev

og Besøgs forbud),

is strictly proportionate to the needs of the criminal

investigation.

In their response to the 2008 visit report, the Danish authorities lay out the legal

provisions in the Administration of Justice Act governing such restrictions and state that, in

practice, the decision whether or not to impose restrictions on the right to receive visits or mail

(“B&B”) is taken by the prosecutor at the time when the decision on remand in custody (or the

prolonging thereof) is taken by the court. The prosecutor may only make a decision to impose

restrictions that are deemed necessary in accordance with Section 770 of the Administration of

Justice Act. The response concludes that “from the point of view of the Director of Public

Prosecutions the rules set out in the Administration of Justice Act and in the Remand Custody

Order provide sufficient safeguards, including the possibility for court review, in relation to remand

prisoners’ rights to receive visits and to send and receive letters.”

The delegation which carried out the visit in 2014 noted once again the high proportion of

remand prisoners with “B&B” restrictions. The restrictions could be applied throughout the remand

period, including during any appeal and while awaiting sentence confirmation, which effectively

meant that they could continue for many months and up to a year or more. Many remand prisoners

subject to “B&B” claimed that once the restrictions were imposed there was no point in challenging

them before the court because they were always upheld. A 17 year-old remand prisoner who had

been in detention for more than two months and was scheduled to be sentenced three weeks later, in

early March 2014, claimed that the judge upheld the “B&B” measure on the grounds that the police

stated there was a risk he would threaten witnesses. Contact with his family was severely restricted

as he was prohibited from making phone calls and his mother had only been able to visit him twice

in two months as she lived a considerable distance from the prison, both of these visits had taken

place in the presence of a police officer. Given the principle that remand prisoners should only be

subject to those restrictions which are necessary to secure the purpose of remand custody or the

maintenance of order and security in the detention centre (see Section 770 of the Administration of

Justice Act), certain restrictions such as no access to the telephone would appear to be

disproportionate. The CPT is not convinced that the safeguards in place are sufficient.

35.

The CPT considers that the use of judicial restrictions on remand prisoners’ contacts with

the outside world should be limited to the strict minimum necessary for investigation purposes and

that there should be a more rigorous supervision of their application. Indeed, every effort should be

made to promote contact with the outside world. Moreover, the longer the measure of “B&B” is

imposed on a prisoner in remand custody, the more rigorous should be the tests as to whether such a

measure remains necessary and proportionate.

See in particular the report on the 2008 visit : CPT/Inf (2008) 26, paragraphs 43 and 44.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 26 -

The CPT reiterates its recommendation that the Danish authorities reinforce the

safeguards surrounding the application of judicial restrictions on remand prisoners’ contacts

with the outside world, namely:

that the police be given detailed instructions as regards recourse to

prohibitions/restrictions concerning prisoners’ correspondence and visits;

that there be an obligation to state the reasons in writing for any such measure;

that, in the context of each periodic review by a court of the necessity to continue

remand in custody, the question of the necessity for the police to continue to impose

particular restrictions upon a remand prisoner’s visits, telephone calls and letters be

considered as a separate issue.

36.

The grounds for placement in the Police Headquarters Prison in Copenhagen remain the

same as those described in the report on the 2008 visit.

All prisoners were accommodated in

single-occupancy cells (8m²), which were equipped with a bed, desk, chair, wardrobe, fridge and

television. The material conditions were satisfactory.

However, the regime remained restrictive. Prisoners were offered one hour of outdoor

exercise every day in one of three rooftop enclosed yards, each equipped with a bench, a basketball

ring and some cover against inclement weather. They could also access a small gym with exercise

bicycles three times a week for one hour with one other prisoner. A teacher employed by the

establishment provided tuition on a one-to-one basis for one hour per week, and there was a

possibility for prisoners to associate for up to four hours a day in the cell with one other prisoner.

However, at least seven of the inmates met by the delegation had not been granted such an

opportunity as the management of the prison selected which prisoners were suitable to associate

together. For those with no association time, human contact was extremely limited as they were

confined to their cells for 22 to 23 hours a day and even when outside their cells they did not see, let

alone interact, with other prisoners and contact with prison officers was minimal.

The CPT recommends that greater efforts be made to ensure that all prisoners are

offered the possibility to associate or to be involved in activities requiring human contact for

several hours every day.

37.

As regards the placement policy, due to the insufficient number of prisoners falling within

Category 1 (i.e. “negatively strong” prisoners), the establishment held a mix of prisoners in terms of

legal status and security and regime needs; however, as was the case in 2008, they were all treated

identically. For example, one prisoner stated that the reason he had been sent to the Police

Headquarters Prison was due to a shortage of space at Western Prison and that he had been told he

would be relocated back to this establishment as soon as possible. However, three weeks later he

still did not know how long the “temporary” placement would last. It would not be acceptable for

prisoners to be accommodated at Copenhagen Police Headquarters Prison merely to ensure that the

establishment operates at more than 80% capacity. If the Danish Prison and Probation Service

intends to accommodate prisoners at this facility who do not fulfil the requirements of a “negatively

strong” prisoner, efforts should be made to provide a more meaningful regime for them. More

generally, the CPT continues to believe that the placement criteria should be rendered more

transparent.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities review the situation at the

Copenhagen Police Headquarters Prison, in the light of the above remarks.

See CPT/Inf (2008) 26, paragraph 35.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 27 -

38.

The CPT’s delegation paid a targeted visit to the high-security section A1 in Vridsløselille

Prison, where it examined the situation of two prisoners who were in long-term administrative

segregation. One of the prisoners had effectively spent nearly four and a half years in solitary

confinement between May 2006 and December 2009 and from 22 December 2011 to 17 July

2012,

primarily at East Jutland, Vridsløselille and Western Prisons.

In January 2014, this

prisoner had been transferred from East Jutland Prison back to Vridsløselille Prison; at the time of

the visit, he was offered one hour of outdoor exercise every day in a small yard under CCTV and

the possibility to associate with another prisoner selected by the prison management for one hour

every day; however, he declined both these opportunities. He also received no visits. Despite the

lack of human contact, the prisoner was lively and engaging and senior staff at the prison believed

that he would be in a position to be transferred onto a normal accommodation wing by the middle of

the year.

Nevertheless, the CPT considers that placing a prisoner in administrative solitary

confinement for such an extensive period cannot be conducive to his mental welfare or to the

process of his preparation for reintegration into society, and that more rigorous safeguards

surrounding such a measure should be in place.

In this respect, the delegation was concerned to

learn that no psychological or psychiatric support was being offered or envisaged for the prisoner

despite the assessments made by a clinical psychologist in October 2010 and February 2013 who

had recommended extensive support to assist him towards being able to cope outside of prison.

In the light of the above,

the CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take the

necessary measures to ensure that:



any prisoner subject to prolonged solitary confinement:

has the right of appeal to an independent authority;

has a plan drawn up to address the reasons for the issues which require the

prisoner to be kept in solitary confinement;

has a multi-disciplinary team to review the plan initially after one month and

thereafter every three months, with the right to appeal any decision to prolong

the solitary confinement;



the longer the situation of solitary confinement continues, the more thorough the

review should be and the more resources made available to attempt to (re)integrate

the prisoner into the main prison community;



the above-mentioned prisoner is provided with psychological and, if necessary,

psychiatric counselling to assist him to associate with other prisoners and more

importantly prepare him for reintegration into society;

He had also been held in solitary confinement while on remand at Nyborg Prison from 6 July to 26 September

2005.

He had escaped from prison on more than one occasion, including in a high-profile break out in 1995.

See in particular paragraph 57c. of the substantive section on Solitary Confinement of Prisoners (paragraphs 53

to 64) in the 21

General Report on the CPT’s activities of 10 November 2011.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 28 -

39.

Further, the CPT was informed about an incident at East Jutland Prison in January 2009

during which the above-mentioned prisoner alleged that he had been almost strangled by certain

prison officers while restrained. As a consequence, he had been hospitalised, his injuries had been

documented and a police investigation subsequently opened. However, the investigation had

apparently been closed a year later as it had not been possible to identify which prison officers had

been involved in the assault and a CCTV recording of the incident had apparently been deleted.

The CPT considers that in the light of the medical evidence available and its consistency with the

allegation of strangulation, together with knowledge of the prison staffing schedule and the prison

officers responsible for monitoring the prisoner, it would have been possible to have carried out a

more effective investigation to identify the perpetrators or those who were negligent in their duty to

safeguard the prisoner’s physical integrity.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities carry out a full review of the police

investigation into this case of alleged ill-treatment by prison officers at East Jutland Prison in

2009, and inform the Committee of the outcome accordingly.

Conditions of detention

40.

In the course of the 2014 visit, the CPT’s delegation received numerous complaints from

prisoners in all the remand prisons visited, but especially at Western Prison and the Police

Headquarters Prison, that they often had to wait in excess of 10 minutes to access the toilet and at

times as much as 30 minutes. The delays at night time could apparently be longer. Some inmates

stated that as a consequence they had had to urinate in the sink, especially those on medication

which required an increased liquid intake. It is incumbent upon the Prison and Probation Service to

ensure that the establishment is adequately staffed in order to ensure that all prisoners are able to

access the toilet in a timely manner.

The CPT recommends that steps be taken to ensure that prisoners in all remand

establishments, notably Western Prison and Police Headquarters Prison in Copenhagen have

ready access to a proper toilet facility at any time of the day or night. It would be far

preferable to install in-cell toilets in all prison establishments.

Aarhus and Odense Remand Prisons

41.

Aarhus Remand Prison had sixty cells spread over four floors. Each cell (8m²) was suitably

equipped (bed, table, chair, wardrobe, television, fridge and a sink), and had good access to natural

light and adequate ventilation. Double occupancy cells with two beds were slightly larger (some

10m²). In the basement of the building, several rooms were used for association purposes (a games

room, a cards room, a fitness room and a leisure room) and there was also a library on the top floor

next to the classroom. There were five small (each measuring approximately 25m²) and five large

(each measuring approximately 40m²) outdoor exercise yards equipped with a table and bench, a

basketball hoop and a barbeque grill, and a covered area to protect inmates from inclement weather.

At the time of the visit, 38 prisoners were involved in an activity (cleaning, maintenance, workshop,

education, cell work) with 11 prisoners classified as sick and 10 as not wanting any activity.

Inmates were offered one hour of outdoor exercise every day and could sign up to spend one hour

with up to three other prisoners in one of the association rooms in the basement. They were also

permitted to associate with another prisoner in a cell for up to four hours a day.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 29 -

The material conditions in Odense Remand Prison were of a similar standard and the range

of activities comparable. There were five outdoor exercise yards of differing sizes, each with a

covered area for inclement weather, and equipped with a table, bench, ping pong table and

barbeque.

Ringe State Prison

42.

The living conditions in the seven accommodation units could be considered as good. Six of

the wings were of an identical layout adjacent to one another off a central corridor. Each wing

consisted of an open plan communal kitchen (knives were attached to the wall with wire) and living

area with sofa and television, a games room (table football, video games, music system) and up to

twelve single-occupancy rooms. The rooms (7m²) were furnished with a bed, table and chair,

cupboards, a television, a fridge and a sink; access to natural light via a large window was good,

and artificial lighting, ventilation and heating were sufficient. Rooms were open from 7 a.m. to

9.30 p.m. Each wing had an adjoining garden area which separated it from the next wing. Prisoners

ordered their own food via an on-line store list with a local supermarket and were responsible for

making breakfast and dinner for themselves.

The prison had a large recreational outdoor area for prisoners to access, particularly during

the summer months, which included a football pitch, beach volleyball, hockey and basketball

facilities and a rose garden. As to activities, at the time of the visit, 26 prisoners were engaged in

one of the workshops (metal work, carpentry, assembly) and another five did cell work; 13

prisoners were occupied with cleaning, gardening, maintenance and painting work; nine prisoners

attended day school and seven prisoners were undertaking other educational activities. The prison

also offered a range of programmes to assist inmates such as anger management, dialogue against

violence, debt rescheduling, and at the time of the visit nine prisoners were following a drug

treatment course. Once the working day had ended at 3.15 p.m., prisoners could participate in

various recreational and sports activities. However, despite the impressive range of activities,

prisoners were not systematically offered one hour of outdoor exercise every day unless they were

serving a disciplinary sanction of solitary confinement or were in voluntary isolation.

Western Prison

43.

At the time of the 2014 visit, the conditions of detention at the Western Prison were

essentially adequate and remained the same as those described in the report on the 2008 visit.

Nine cells were each accommodating two prisoners due to the overcrowding in the establishment.

The CPT’s delegation noted that some of the cells had damaged furniture or were missing curtains,

and the management of the prison recognised the necessity for a rolling programme of upgrading

the facilities; since the previous visit, new cell windows had been installed in several of the wings

which provided improved access to natural lighting and better ventilation and the visiting facilities

were in the process of being rebuilt.

See CPT/Inf (2008) 26, paragraphs 53 and 54.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 30 -

Prisoners could engage in a range of activities; vocational training, education, sports,

recreational and work, such as kitchen, maintenance, cleaning, in-cell assembly and various

workshops. The facilities were in general good and the management encouraged prisoners to engage

in activities, even though the average length of stay in the establishment was less than two months.

The challenge facing the prison was to engage with the large number of foreign nationals who did

not speak either Danish or English so that they could benefit from the activities on offer.

The CPT recommends that every effort be made to avoid accommodating two

prisoners in cells designed for single occupancy at Western Prison. Efforts should also be

made to replace damaged furniture and missing curtains. Further, the CPT encourages the

management of Western Prison to pursue their efforts to offer all prisoners access to

purposeful activities during their time at the establishment.

juveniles in prison

44.

In the course of the visit, the CPT’s delegation met a few juveniles on remand at Aarhus and

Western Prisons and a sentenced juvenile at Ringe State Prison.

The only closed section for juveniles sentenced to imprisonment in the Danish prison system

is currently Wing 6 of Ringe State Prison. At the time of the visit, there were three juveniles

accommodated in the wing

and the management had decided to allocate two other young prisoners

to the wing to provide greater opportunities for association, as the inmates on this wing did not

associate with other prisoners in the establishment. The rules on the wing were different in that

inmates could not be alone in another inmate’s room and meals were taken together communally

with at least one member of staff. All the juveniles and young adults were attending school and

participating in some workshop activities as well as actively assisting in cooking and cleaning the

wing and participating in sports activities every day. In general, the living conditions were very

good, there was a range of purposeful activities and all the inmates felt safe. Poor or threatening

behaviour was addressed through time outs in the inmate’s room for up to three hours and extensive

discussions between staff and the inmate concerned. The juveniles on the wing appreciated this

approach although one of the older inmates found it demeaning. In sum, the pedagogical approach

appeared to follow that applied in the secure juvenile institutions.

At Western Prison, the juvenile department consisted of nine cells on the third floor of the

Syd

wing, and was semi-partitioned from the rest of the floor. At the time of the visit, there were

three 17-year-olds and the rest were young adults assigned to the wing by the prison management.

The conditions in the cells were the same as in the rest of the prison. The prison has established a

dedicated pavilion for the inmates on this unit to which an educator took them every morning where

they ate a communal breakfast and participated in several activities (silverwork, cooking, sewing).

There was also the possibility to attend school a few times a week and to undertake physical

exercise. However, at the time of the visit, at least three of the inmates were confined to their cells

for 23 hours a day, with one hour of outdoor exercise and the possibility to associate with one other

young person for three hours a day in their cell.

Two of whom were absent at the time of the visit.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 31 -

At Aarhus Remand Prison, there was one 17-year-old inmate who had been transferred from

Køglen secure juvenile institution two months earlier upon his request following a conflict with an

educator. The juvenile attended school four days a week for two hours, went to the library every

Wednesday and was offered one hour of outdoor exercise every day; in addition, he could attend the

recreation rooms in the basement with up to three other inmates and could associate with one other

inmate every day for several hours. The inmate also met the chaplain twice a week. The staff were

attentive to his requests and needs, although there was no special programme in place for juveniles.

Nevertheless, the juvenile stated that he preferred to be in the remand prison than in a secure

institution as he felt he had more autonomy and because he knew several of the other inmates.

45.

One of the cardinal principles enshrined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of

the Child (CRC) and the Beijing Rules

is that juveniles should only be subjected to a measure of

deprivation of liberty as a last resort and for the shortest possible period of time. The CPT

subscribes to this principle and, more particularly, to that of the “best interests of the child” as

formulated in Article 3 of the CRC.

The CPT notes that the number of juveniles held in prison in Denmark was low

and that

special attention was paid to their situation by the staff in those establishments where they were

held. Nevertheless, for juveniles on remand there does not appear to be a clear rationale for placing

them in a prison environment rather than a secure education home. It is true to say that juveniles

met by the delegation in the course of the visit expressed a feeling of pride at having graduated to

“prison” from what they perceived as the more controlling secure juvenile institutions. However, it

is questionable how it could be considered in the “best interests of the child” for him or her to be

placed in a remand prison such as Aarhus or Western Prison when more child-centred alternatives

exist.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities review the policy of placing

juveniles remanded in custody pending trial in a prison establishment rather than a secure

institution for juveniles. Further, all juveniles held in remand custody must be provided with

a full programme of vocational, education, sports and recreational activities.

46.

As regards juveniles sentenced to a closed prison (i.e. Ringe State Prison), it is positive that

the numbers are so low. However, one consequence is that young adults from among the rest of the

prison’s population are brought into the unit to ensure that there are always four or five persons on

the unit at any one time. Further, the unit forms an integral part of the rest of the prison even if the

“juvenile” inmates do not mix with other inmates, after their transfer to this unit. If it is considered

necessary to have a separate unit for sentenced juveniles, consideration might be given to locating

that unit on the grounds of an open prison which was accommodating sentenced juveniles. In this

way, a specialised centre focused around the needs of juveniles could be put in place which would

also provide increased options for managing juveniles in the closed and open sections, including

joint activities.

The CPT would appreciate the observations of the Danish authorities on this matter.

The official title is the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice

adopted on 29 November 1985 by the United Nations General Assembly.

See General Comment No. 14 (2013) on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a

primary consideration (Article 3, paragraph 1) by the Committee on the Rights of the Child.

In 2012, the daily average number of juveniles on remand was 2.9, down from 16.8 in 2009, while the daily

average number of sentenced juveniles was 7.5 (the number varied between 6 in 2007 and 8.7 in 2010).

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 32 -

Further, given that many of the juveniles/young adults had already spent time in several

institutions before prison, a major challenge lies in assisting them make the transition from prison

(with its support and structure) to life in the community.

The Committee would like to be

informed of the measures being taken to facilitate this process.

Health-care services

health-care staffing

47.

The delegation noted that prisoners could generally have access to health-care services

within a reasonable time and that staffing levels were mostly adequate in the establishments visited.

At Aarhus Remand Prison, a nurse was available Monday to Friday (8.45 a.m. to 4.15 p.m.)

and a doctor visited once a week (seeing on average 10 patients), and was on-call during weekdays.

Four hours of psychiatric provision per week had recently been introduced and seven hours of

access to psychology. For a prison population of some 60 inmates, such staffing levels were

sufficient.

At Odense Remand Prison, which is of a similar capacity, a nurse was available Monday to

Friday and a doctor attended one half-day per week and was apparently on-call during working

hours. However, records concerning one patient showed that the doctor had refused to attend the

prison to see a prisoner despite advice from the emergency hospital department, stating that it could

await his next visit (namely, 48 hours later). In the meantime, the prisoner had been transferred to a

psychiatric unit before the doctor’s visit. This case also highlights the need for a psychiatrist to

attend the prison on a regular basis.

At Ringe State Prison, a nurse was present Monday to Friday (7 a.m. to 4 p.m., with one day

until 10 p.m.) and a part-time nurse one day a week. A doctor visited once a week and was on-call

at other times, with medical cover provided by the community service outside of working hours. A

psychiatrist attended six hours every fortnight and a psychologist five hours a week (from 4 p.m. to

9 p.m.), and a dentist one day every two weeks.

The health-care service for the Copenhagen Prisons was based in Western Prison and

consisted of a Head doctor (a cardiologist) and five full-time doctors. There was an on-site doctor

present seven days a week from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., after which there was an on-call rota until 8 a.m.

the following morning. The majority of on-call queries were dealt with by telephone, including

prescribing, but if necessary a doctor would be present at the establishment within 30 minutes. The

nursing team comprised a Head nurse and 16 full-time nurses and three temporary nurses. There

were also two physiotherapists, two bio analysts, six visiting specialists, and a dentist as well as

three psychiatrists providing a total of five sessions a week.

The CPT recommends that regular psychiatric input for Odense Remand Prison be

sourced. Further, doctors’ on-call should be reminded of their duty to attend the prison when

circumstances so require.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 33 -

medical screening and confidentiality

48.

The CPT is obliged to reiterate the importance of medical screening of newly-arrived

prisoners, in particular in the interests of identifying special medical needs, preventing the spread of

transmissible diseases, suicide prevention and the timely recording of any injuries. Such screening

should be carried out as soon as possible and no later than 24 hours after a prisoner’s admission to

the establishment.

49.

At Western Prison, local procedures allowed for newly-admitted prisoners to be screened by

a nurse within 72 hours of their arrival. A review of various medical files revealed that four

prisoners who had arrived more than 72 hours prior to the delegation’s visit still had no health-care

entry in their records while those with an entry merely contained statements such as “physically fit”

or “healthy” or “no substance abuse problems”. One record stated that the prisoner did not

understand English but that he “looked” healthy, without any further qualifying information to

substantiate such an assessment. None of the records documented any physical examination or

assessment of mental health. Moreover, there was no data to check how many prisoners were seen

by the medical team following entry to the establishment with figures varying from 10% (the

nursing team) to 80% (the doctor). The CPT’s delegation also noted that certain prisoners admitted

to Copenhagen Police Headquarters Prison had not been screened prior to their transfer to this

establishment, where no screening was carried out.

Moreover, it should be noted that it was the responsibility of the prison officers admitting a

prisoner to the establishment to identify if there was a health issue which needed to be raised with

health-care staff for a more urgent assessment than having to wait up to 72 hours. Yet, no training

was provided to these prison officers on how to identify medical issues.

On a positive note, a reception screening tool was being developed at the time of the visit,

which hopefully will lay the basis for a more rigorous and comprehensive medical assessment of

each prisoner entering Western Prison.

50.

Newly-admitted prisoners were generally seen by a nurse within 24 hours at Aarhus

Remand Prison and within 48 hours at Odense Remand Prison. However, prisoners admitted over

the weekend were never assessed until Monday and, moreover, there was no formal screening

process (tool) in place.

At Ringe State Prison, a nurse saw all new arrivals within 24 hours except for weekend

admissions who were seen on the following Monday. There was no set screening tool in place.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 34 -

51.

The CPT has emphasised in the past the importance of all persons undergoing a

comprehensive medical assessment upon their admission to prison (see also Rule 42.1 of the

European Prison Rules). This is not the case at the moment in Danish prisons.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take steps to ensure that every

newly-arrived prisoner be properly interviewed and physically examined by a medical doctor,

or a fully qualified nurse reporting to a doctor, during the initial screening. Such screening

should always take place within 24 hours of a person’s admission to prison, and preferably on

the day of arrival at the establishment. Further, each prison health-care service should have

in place a screening tool to enable them to properly assess the health-care needs of each

newly-admitted prisoner.

52.

The CPT has consistently pointed out that prison health care services can make a significant

contribution to the prevention of ill-treatment of detained persons through, inter alia, the systematic

recording of injuries, whether vis-à-vis new arrivals or following a violent episode in prison. In this

respect, the health care services in the prisons visited generally recorded injuries observed in

sufficient detail. However, in addition to a description of any injuries, the doctor should note down

a full account of the statements made by the person concerned which are relevant to the medical

examination. Further, the doctor should indicate as far as possible the consistency between any

allegations made and the objective medical findings; this will enable the relevant authorities to

properly assess the information set out in the record. Such an approach was not being followed in

the prisons visited. Further, it is essential that all such reports are transmitted to the relevant

authorities.

The CPT recommends that the necessary instructions be issued to ensure that any

relevant statements by newly-arrived prisoners or an inmate involved in a violent incident in

prison are recorded by the health-care service, together with the doctor’s observations. The

existing procedures should be reviewed in order to ensure that whenever injuries are

recorded by a doctor which are consistent with allegations of ill-treatment made by a prisoner

(or which, even in the absence of allegations, are indicative of ill-treatment), the record is

immediately and systematically brought to the attention of the supervisory authority,

regardless of the wishes of the person concerned.

53.

As regards medical confidentiality, it appeared that medical examinations always took place

out of the hearing and out of the sight of custodial staff at Ringe State Prison and at Aarhus and

Odense Remand Prisons. However, at Western Prison, medical consultations took place in a

prisoner’s cell with the door left ajar and a prison officer stationed outside; thus, medical

confidentiality was not guaranteed. Further, in order to see the health-care service a prisoner had to

hand over a written application to a prison officer who passed it on to a nurse. Such a system lacks

confidentiality and health-care staff raised concerns themselves regarding the potential for

intimidation of prisoners by officers. The possibility of placing the application in a sealed envelope

existed but was rarely used and prisoners appeared to be unaware of this option.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 35 -

The delegation also observed that in all the establishments visited, prison officers distributed

medication from dosage boxes prepared by nursing staff up to three times a day. An examination of

the records revealed that there were multiple gaps in the drug charts (the record of which prisoner

was provided with which medication and when). However, there was no process for recording

missed medication doses or the reasons therefor and, on occasion, prisoners might not receive the

correct medication. For example, at Western Prison, methadone had been administered to the wrong

prisoner which resulted in the inmate having to be admitted to hospital for assessment. At the time

of the visit, there was still no formal training in place regarding medication management for prison

staff and no formal reporting system of incidents within the health-care service. Moreover, the

medical records indicated that some inmates were concerned that other prisoners were aware of

their prescriptions for sedative medication such as Fenemal.

The CPT recommends that steps be taken to ensure that medical consultations at

Western Prison take place in a location which guarantees medical confidentiality (i.e. that the

medical examination is conducted out of the hearing and – unless the doctor concerned

expressly requests otherwise in a given case – out of the sight of non-medical staff). Further,

the system of making an application to see a member of the health-care staff should be

reviewed to ensure that it guarantees medical confidentiality. In particular, prisoners should

not be obliged to openly state the reason why they wish to see a member of the health-care

staff; they should be informed about the possibility to make an application using a sealed

envelope. Further, medication should only be distributed by health-care staff.

substance misuse

54.

The CPT’s delegation noted that a high number of prisoners in the establishments visited

had a substance abuse problem. At Ringe State Prison, health-care staff estimated that up to 75% of

inmates might have a substance abuse problem, primarily cannabis and benzodiazepines, which

they were able to access illicitly within the prison. Inmates met by the delegation confirmed the

availability of drugs, particularly cannabis, on the accommodation wings and its use and trade were

linked to a number of the violent incidents referred to above (see paragraph 29). The prison applied

a range of detoxification programmes and also had a separate substance misuse unit where prisoners

were subjected to random testing as well as routine testing prior to and after a leave from the unit.

Nevertheless, more needs to be done to address the problem of substance abuse within the prison.

By letter of 4 June 2014, the Danish authorities informed the CPT of the elements of the strategy at

Ringe Prison to control drug abuse both to keep drugs out of the prison as well as to respond to drug

misuse in the establishment.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 36 -

At Western Prison, a prisoner entering the establishment who is addicted to opiates may be

prescribed methadone following a telephone consultation with the doctor on-call, with the prisoner

usually being seen by the doctor the next day. If a person was on methadone prior to entering the

prison, the local authorities responsible for the maintenance treatment would be contacted and the

prisoner usually enrolled in a methadone maintenance programme within the prison. A review of a

number of records showed that no physical observations or examination were recorded in the notes

prior to prescribing medication. Further, it was found that there was no clinical follow-up recorded

after the medication was prescribed, except in one case where the prisoner was recorded as having

had significant side effects following the previous day’s dose. At the other remand establishments

visited, the delegation noted that there was also an inadequate follow-up process for persons

prescribed treatment. In addition, substitution and detoxification programmes were not always

accompanied by social and psychological support and educational training, although at Western

Prison a local organisation was providing some psycho-social support.

The CPT recommends that initial assessments of substance misuse should include a

physical examination and that all prisoners prescribed detoxification treatment should be

seen by a doctor and have a care plan drawn up. The CPT also recommends that more

effective steps be taken to implement a three-pronged strategy in all prisons: to put an end to

the supply of drugs, to reduce as far as possible the demand for drugs and to provide

appropriate assistance to prisoners with drug-related problems.

Prison Hospital at Western Prison

55.

The prison hospital within Western Prison contained 36 beds and had a 90% occupancy rate,

with prisoners throughout the prison system referred to the hospital if they were considered too

unwell for accommodation on a normal prison wing. The level of care was good and the material

conditions require no particular comments (see paragraph 47 above for staffing).

As regards activities, patients could access an exercise room for at least two sessions a

week, and had access to the main sports hall and an outdoor exercise yard. Physiotherapists

attended up to three times a week, as required, treating patients with mobility problems or post-

hospital care.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 37 -

Other issues

reception and induction

56.

In addition to medical screening on arrival, the reception and induction procedures as a

whole have an important role to play; performed properly, they can identify at least certain of those

at risk of self-harm and relieve some of the anxiety experienced by all newly-arrived prisoners.

Regrettably, in the prisons visited there were no rigorous admission procedures whereby all new

prisoners would undergo a risk assessment before being allocated to a cell and provided with

toiletries, bedding and a hot meal. Nor was there any induction programme to acquaint prisoners

with the regime and running of the prison, or to ensure that they had been able to contact their

family. The Committee considers that such basic procedures on admission are vital in assisting

inmates entering the criminal justice system to adjust to prison life.

At Western Prison, the brief reception procedures were focused on administrative and

security matters such as checking luggage and clothes, including a requirement for every prisoner to

strip naked. However, it appeared that no note was taken of visible injuries on a prisoner’s body,

such as police dog bite marks, nor of any vulnerability which might affect the ability of the person

to cope with prison life.

Moreover, prisoners were not provided with any information on the regulations governing

the day-to-day activities and procedures in the prison. Instead, they had to rely on other prisoners to

tell them about the regime and the rules, which placed certain prisoners in a superior position.

Indeed, a prison officer on the induction section on the lower two floors of

Syd

wing told the

delegation “usually inmates learn things from other inmates. If they ask, we can also give them

information”. Further, for foreign national prisoners who did not speak English, the lack of

information in a language they could understand placed them in a particularly vulnerable position,

as members of the delegation observed in the course of the visit. For example, a foreign national

prisoner explained to the delegation that it was only after two days that he found out there was a

vial of washing up liquid available on the landings at certain times for inmates to take to wash their

plates and cutlery, and that prior to this prison staff had reacted angrily to his attempts after meals to

hand over his dirty plate.

57.

The management at Western Prison acknowledged the need to put in place improved

procedures to inform prisoners about the schedule and practices in the establishment and were

looking into developing the information booklet (which was not distributed by staff) and perhaps

putting together a pictogram brochure. Consideration might also be given to developing an

information video which could be dubbed into the most common foreign languages and which

prisoners could access either in their cells or in a common room after they had completed the

reception procedures.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities put in place a more comprehensive

reception and induction process in all remand prisons which should include the provision of

information in a language that the prisoner understands.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 38 -

prison staff

58.

To obtain personnel of the right calibre, the authorities must be prepared to invest adequate

resources into the process of recruitment and training. The real professionalism of prison staff

requires that they should be able to deal with prisoners in a decent and humane manner while

paying attention to matters of security and good order. In this regard, prison management should

encourage staff to have a reasonable sense of trust and expectation that prisoners are willing to

behave themselves properly. The development of constructive and positive relations between prison

staff and prisoners will not only reduce the risk of ill-treatment but also enhance control and

security. In turn, it will render the work of prison staff far more rewarding.

59.

In general, staffing numbers in the prison establishments visited were good. For example, at

Western Prison, where there were some 450 prisoners, there was an overall staffing complement of

698, of whom 449 were prison officers. The presence of male and female staff in all prisons can

have a beneficial effect in terms of both the custodial ethos and in fostering a degree of normality in

a place of detention,

and the CPT’s delegation noted favourably the practice of mixed-sex staffing

in all the prisons visited; at Western Prison, 38% of prison officers were female.

However, with the increasing number of foreign national prisoners and Danish prisoners

from ethnic minorities entering the prison system, there is a greater need to recruit staff from

diverse backgrounds, preferably with a knowledge of foreign languages, to reflect better the prison

population.

The CPT would appreciate the observations of the Danish authorities on this

matter.

60.

The CPT considers it important to be able to offer all prison officers a programme of further

training and refresher courses, such as those on mental health, psychology, suicide prevention, anti-

bullying, cultural awareness, etc. In particular, an ongoing emphasis should be placed on

developing inter-personal communication skills. With foreign nationals comprising up to 60% of

the prison population in certain establishments (notably, Western Prison), it is essential that prison

officers possess developed inter-personal communication skills as the CPT’s delegation observed

for itself how cultural and linguistic misunderstandings could rapidly deteriorate into conflictual

behaviour and the application of the use of force.

In addition, a positive practice at Western Prison would be to appoint a dedicated foreign

national prison officer, who could meet and provide advice to each new foreign national and serve

as a point of reference. Further, concerted efforts should be made to provide foreign nationals with

clear information on immigration procedures, through consultation meetings and information

packs.

See also Rule 85 of the European Prison Rules and the comments thereon.

See also Recommendation CM/Rec (2012) 12 concerning foreign prisoners which was adopted by the

Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 10 October 2012.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 39 -

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take the necessary steps to enhance

the ongoing training for prison officers, particularly as concerns inter-personal

communication skills. Further, consideration should be given to providing the necessary

support to foreign national prisoners in all establishments and the appointment of a dedicated

foreign national prison officer at Western Prison, in the light of the above remarks.

discipline

61.

Danish legislation envisages three types of disciplinary sanctions: warning, fine and

placement in a disciplinary cell. The last-mentioned sanction may only be imposed for the

following offences: escape or failure to return from leave; smuggling, possession or use of alcohol

or drugs; refusal to provide a urine sample; smuggling or possession of arms and other dangerous

objects; violence or threats of violence against fellow inmates or staff; gross vandalism; other

serious or frequently repeated offences.

Decisions regarding disciplinary sanctions may be

appealed against to the Prisons and Probation Service. In case of placement in a disciplinary cell for

more than 7 days, the decision may also be appealed against in court. The maximum length of

placement in a disciplinary cell is four weeks.

In the Committee’s view, a continuous period of up to 28 days of solitary confinement as a

punishment is excessive. The Committee considers that the maximum period of solitary

confinement as a punishment should be no more than 14 days for a given offence, and preferably

lower.

Further, there should be a prohibition on sequential disciplinary sentences resulting in an

uninterrupted period of solitary confinement in excess of that maximum period. Any offences

committed by a prisoner which might call for more severe sanctions should be dealt with through

the criminal justice system.

As regards minors, the CPT has very strong reservations as concerns any form of solitary

confinement of juveniles as this can compromise their physical and/or mental integrity. To this end,

it considers that a juvenile should not be placed in solitary confinement for disciplinary purposes for

more than three days.

The CPT recommends that the Law on the Enforcement of Sentences and other

relevant regulations in relation to disciplinary matters be revised accordingly, taking into

account the above remarks.

62.

As was the case in 2008, the delegation was satisfied that the disciplinary procedure offered

adequate safeguards to prisoners (in particular, the right to be heard; the right to have access to a

lawyer; the right to appeal against the sanction). Further, the records of disciplinary hearings in the

establishments visited were scrupulously kept. Moreover, it was noted that the disciplinary

punishment of solitary confinement never exceeded 14 days and was in most cases much lower.

See Sections 67 and 68 of the Law on the Enforcement of Sentences.

See the 21

General Report on the CPT’s activities – CPT/Inf (2011) 28, paragraph 56 (b).

See the 18

General Report on the CPT’s activities – CPT/Inf (2008) 25, paragraph 26.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 40 -

security-related issues

63.

As regards the use of force, an examination of the relevant documentation showed that in

most instances prison officers only resorted to manual restraint (hand grips) to control an agitated

prisoner and that where batons were deployed their use was proportionate. This picture was

generally confirmed by interviews with prisoners.

As regards pepper spray, Executive Order 547 of 27 May 2011 on the Use of Force in

Prisons provides for its use where there is a concrete situation of particular risk and the Director or

other responsible officer authorises its distribution and deployment. Further, the Executive Order

states that an inmate should be informed that pepper spray will be used if staff orders are not

obeyed. Following its use the inmate should be offered relief and a report drawn up on its use,

which is sent to the Department of Prisons and Probation.

In the cases examined by the CPT’s delegation, it was always reported that the inmate was

warned that pepper spray would be used if he did not comply with the officer’s order and following

its use the inmate was provided with the possibility to wash himself, and was usually seen by a

member of the health-care staff. Further, its application did not appear to be excessive; for example,

five times in the 13 months at Western Prison. However, in a few of the cases examined it appeared

that the use of pepper spray was a result of poor communication. For example, at Aarhus Remand

Prison a foreign national who was to be sent back to his country a few days later had just received

his passport and when prison officials took it away from him he became agitated which resulted in

him being taken to the observation cell. When he refused to take his clothes off, pepper spray was

applied to his face (see also paragraph 64). None of the prison officers spoke the language of the

inmate and it turned out the prisoner feared that his passport would be lost. In another case, pepper

spray was applied through the hatch of the cell door at Copenhagen Police Prison Headquarters to

calm a foreign national prisoner who was threatening to self-harm with a piece of plastic from the

fridge.

In sum, clearly defined safeguards do regulate the use of pepper spray in Danish prisons.

However, the CPT considers that pepper spray is a potentially dangerous substance and should not be

used in confined spaces. In particular, it should never be considered legitimate to diffuse pepper-spray

through the hatch of a cell door. Moreover, the Committee considers that its use could be further

reduced through improved communication skills by prison officers.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities review the use of pepper spray in the

light of the above remarks.

64.

Executive Order No. 283 of 26 March 2012 issued by the Ministry of Justice lays out the

rules governing segregation in observation cells, as required by Article 64 of the Law on Sentence

Enforcement. The Order stipulates in Article 16 that a prisoner may be placed in an observation cell

to prevent vandalism, for reasons of order and security or for “special observation”. If segregation

in an observation cell lasts for more than three days the Prison and Probation Service must be

informed but otherwise Article 18 (2) states that it must be discontinued promptly when the

conditions for such segregation are no longer present. Article 20 (2) of the Order provides that “If

necessary in the individual case, the inmate’s clothes may also be changed. If so, the inmate must be

requested to change his clothes himself.”

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 41 -

The CPT considers that the procedures for placement in an observation cell for reasons of

order and security need to be clearly distinguished from those relating to prevention of suicide and

self-harm. In the latter cases, a member of health care staff should always be involved in the

placement decision. The same lack of distinction between good order and health care exists in

relation to placement of a prisoner in a security cell (see paragraph 67 below).

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take the necessary steps to clarify

the legal regulations concerning the placement of prisoners in observation and security cells.

65.

In the course of the 2014 visit, the delegation had an opportunity to examine the placement

of prisoners in an observation cell at Western Prison. In the period from 1 January 2013 to

5 February 2014, there had been 612 placements in observation cells at Western Prison of which 46

were to prevent vandalism, 235 for reasons of order and security and 331 for special observation.

The vast majority were for periods under 24 hours; however, 36 were longer than 24 hours and 14

lasted for more than three days. One person spent 265 days in an observation cell to prevent

vandalism and two others 128 and 228 days, respectively, for special observation.

The observation cells examined by the delegation were equipped with a metal-frame bed

attached to the floor, a mattress and a blanket. No activities were offered and each time a prisoner

left the cell to go to the toilet, he or she was escorted by prison staff. Accommodation in such cells

is clearly meant to be limited to short periods of time.

In this respect, the Committee would like

to be informed of the safeguards surrounding placement in such a cell when it exceed days,

and lasts for weeks and months on end. Further, it would like to receive information on the

reasons why the three persons referred to above were placed in an observation cell for such

prolonged periods, and what their daily regime was during this period. At the very least, the

CPT recommends that all persons held in an observation cell longer than 24 hours are offered

one hour of outdoor exercise.

66.

The CPT’s delegation observed that prisoners placed in an observation cell often had all

their clothes removed and were left in the cell wearing only their underwear. This is totally

inappropriate. Prisoners spoken to by the delegation expressed their feelings of humiliation at

having to remain in a cell in just their underpants while being under close observation by staff.

Further, many prisoners, especially foreign nationals, did not understand why they had to remove

their clothes when they were taken to an observation cell and, not infrequently, the process of

removing a prisoner’s clothes was a source of conflict and violence. In certain cases, it was also the

precursor for the decision to remove a prisoner to a security cell, where he or she would be fixated.

These three persons were placed in an observation cell, respectively, on 16 May, 29 September and 21 June

2013.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 42 -

In the CPT’s view, only when there is an evident suicide risk or case of self-harm should an

inmate have to remove his or her clothes and, in such cases, the inmate should be provided with rip-

proof clothing and footwear. Moreover, the placement of a prisoner in an observation cell for the

purpose of preventing suicide or self-harm and its continuation should only be made upon the

authorisation of the medical doctor, when all other measures are inadequate; and the removal of

clothes should follow an individual risk assessment, and be authorised by the doctor. Further, the

doctor should attend prisoners placed in observation on a daily basis.

Where there is a need for a disruptive or violent prisoner to be rapidly transferred to an

observation cell, the person concerned should only be kept in such a cell until such time as he/she

has calmed down, whereupon he/she should be placed in an ordinary cell and, if appropriate,

managed through the disciplinary process or the provisions regulating removal from association

under Article 63 of the Law on Enforcement of Sentences. Further, the prisoner’s clothing should

not be removed unless this is found to be justified following an individual risk assessment.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities review the use of observation cells

both as regards prisoners at risk of suicide or self-harm and for prisoners who are disruptive

or violent. Further, in those cases where the risk of self-injury warrants the removal of

clothes, prisoners should be provided with rip-proof clothing and footwear.

67.

Article 66 (1) of the Law on Enforcement of Sentences provides that “an inmate may be

confined in a security cell and be immobilised by force by the application of a body belt, wrist and

ankle straps and mittens, if necessary, to avert imminent violence or overcome violent resistance, or

to prevent suicide or self-mutilation.” No confinement in a security cell and forced immobilisation

may be effected if such a measure would be disproportionate in view of the purpose of the measure

and the indignity and discomfort which might be caused by it. Moreover, any confinement in a

security cell and forced immobilisation must be effected with as much consideration as

circumstances permit. The Law also states that the institution shall promptly request a doctor to

attend the inmate but the doctor does not need to attend if he or she “deems such attendance

obviously unnecessary”.

In the CPT’s view, the doctor should always visit a fixated prisoner.

All the prisons visited, with the exception of Ringe State Prison, possessed one or more

security cells which were furnished with a bed bolted to the floor;

an inmate would be placed face

down on the bed while his ankles were placed in leather bracelets, after which he would be rolled

over onto his back with his arms alongside his body, and his ankles and wrists would be

immobilised with leather bracelets and a broad leather strap would be placed across his chest to

immobilise the torso. Whenever an inmate was immobilised in a security cell, a prison officer sat

outside the room monitoring the inmate through a viewing panel and was required to note down his

or her observations every 15 minutes. The delegation noted that the recording of all measures of

fixation was carried out diligently.

At Aarhus Remand Prison, the security cell also possessed a television which had been installed at the

recommendation of the Parliamentary Ombudsman.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 43 -

68.

The CPT continues to have several concerns in relation to the resort to the measure of

fixation in prisons. At Western Prison, from 1 January 2013 to 6 February 2014, there had been 50

cases of prisoners placed in a security cell and fixated; in 31 cases, the reason provided was to

overcome violent resistance. From the cases examined, the Committee is not convinced that the

purpose of resort to fixation cannot at times be construed as a punishment. For example, a foreign

national from Syria who was sent to Western Prison from Ellebæk, became agitated in the reception

area and when told to remove his clothes for a strip search started shouting and apparently

attempted to hit a prison officer. Consequently, he was escorted naked apart from a pair of

underpants through the ground floor of

Syd

wing and across a courtyard to the security cell in the

hospital wing; during the transfer the prisoner was compliant and did not attempt to struggle or

make a noise. The moment of agitation had passed and yet instead of placing him in the security

cell for observation, it was deemed necessary to fixate him for 2 hours and 45 minutes. In another

case, a prisoner who had self-harmed by cutting himself was being transferred to an observation cell

without the use of any hand grips by the escorting officers when he apparently began punching the

air and speaking in Arabic. Three officers decided to restrain the prisoner, who resisted while being

held down on the bed, and he was subsequently carried by four officers to the security cell where he

was stripped of his clothes and fixated for 2 hours and 36 minutes.

69.

In addition, the CPT is concerned by the length of time that certain prisoners may be fixated.

Of the 50 cases referred to above, 20 were terminated within three hours and a further 10 within 10

hours; of the remaining 20 cases, seven were for periods greater than 24 hours. One prisoner was

fixated on ten different occasions between 24 April and 27 September 2013 for a total of 216 hours;

on six occasions the reason provided was “overcoming violent resistance”, with the longest period

of fixation being 44 hours and 8 minutes. Such periods of fixation are totally disproportionate and

unjustifiable.

70.

As regards medical supervision, the delegation noted that a doctor is always informed

whenever a prisoner is fixated. The practice at Western Prison was for nursing staff to wait up to 30

minutes before seeing the prisoner in order to allow him to calm down.

Thereafter, the nursing

team will review a fixated prisoner three times a day and a doctor once a day. However, it was

emphasised that health-care staff are not responsible for the decision either to fixate a prisoner or to

end the measure.

In this respect, it is essential that every prisoner is provided with a debriefing after the end of

the measure of fixation in order to ensure that he or she understands why the measure was imposed.

Several prisoners spoken to by the CPT’s delegation stated clearly that they did not understand why

they had been fixated.

Indeed the delegation noted from the individual records that the prisoner was usually calm after a short period

of being fixated and yet the measure was continued for many hours, often resulting in the prisoner becoming

agitated.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 44 -

71.

The CPT recognises that in certain jurisdictions of the Council of Europe, the authorities

have deemed it necessary to provide for the possibility on rare occasions to resort to fixating

inmates in a prison setting. To this end, the Committee has advocated a number of principles and

minimum standards that should be taken into consideration whenever the measure of fixation is

applied.

It has also taken careful note of the Danish authorities’ response to the report on the 2008

visit in which they refer extensively to the statutory provisions in Section 66(1) of the Act on the

Enforcement of Sentences, pointing out that the measure of immobilisation is subject to the

principles of proportionality and considerateness.

However,

the findings of the 2014 visit demonstrate that there is a need to review the

current approach towards the resort to fixation in prison and put in place far stricter rules

governing its application. In particular, the following issues should be reviewed:



Regarding its appropriate use, fixation should only be used as a last resort to

prevent the risk of harm to the individual or others and only when all other

reasonable options would fail to satisfactorily contain those risks; it should never be

used as a punishment or to compensate for a shortage of trained staff.

Any resort to fixation should always be either expressly ordered by a doctor or

immediately brought to the attention of a doctor, and the doctor should in all cases

visit the fixated prisoner.

The duration of fixation should be for the shortest possible time (usually minutes

rather than hours). The exceptional prolongation of restraint should warrant a

further review by a doctor. Restraint for periods of days at a time cannot have any

justification and would amount to ill-treatment.

Persons subject to fixation should receive full information on the reasons for the

intervention.

The management of any establishment which might use fixation should issue formal

written guidelines, taking account of the above criteria, to all staff who may be

involved.



Further, the person concerned should be given the opportunity to discuss his/her

experience, during and, in any event, as soon as possible after the end of a period of

restraint.

The Committee recommends that the Danish authorities take the necessary steps to

ensure that all the principles and minimum safeguards set out above are applied rigorously in

all prison establishments resorting to the measure of fixation and, if necessary, amend the law

accordingly.

See paragraph 71 of the report on the 2008 visit – CPT/Inf (2008) 26.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 45 -

contact with the outside world

72.

As was the case during previous visits, the CPT’s delegation noted favourably the

arrangements in place for sentenced prisoners to maintain contact with the outside world. At Ringe

State Prison, weekly visits lasted three hours long and prisoners could also apply to receive

overnight family visits and to go on weekend leave. The visiting facilities at Ringe State Prison

were of a high standard and family friendly while those at Western Prison were in the process of

being upgraded at the time of the visit. Access to the telephone and prisoner correspondence could

be considered satisfactory.

Remand prisoners were offered one hour of visit every week and access to the telephone and

correspondence was adequate. However, many persons on “B & B” judicial restrictions complained

that they could not communicate in their own language when they had visits and that as they were

not permitted telephone calls, they felt cut off from the outside world (see also paragraphs 33 and

34). In this context, the delegation met a number of prisoners at Western Prison who had relatives

within the prison but who were not permitted to have contact with them due to the “B & B” regime

being applied to them. Such a restriction would appear excessive, especially when they had no other

close relatives in the country.

The CPT would appreciate the observations of the Danish authorities on these matters.

complaints and inspections

73.

In the course of the visit, many prisoners stated that they did not have confidence in the

complaints system as any written complaint had to be handed over to the prison officer on their

landing with the subject matter of the complaint clearly visible. Further, several mentioned that they

required more support in order to express themselves clearly due to their literacy challenges.

Moreover, there still did not appear to be a structured approach towards complaints which could be

usefully exploited by the prison authorities to assist in identifying issues to address at a general

level.

The CPT considers that the existing internal complaints system needs to be further

reviewed; for example, prisoners ought to be able to make written complaints at any moment and

place them in a locked complaints box on a prison landing (forms should be freely available); all

written complaints should be registered centrally within the prison before being allocated to a

particular service for investigation or follow up. In all cases, the investigation should be carried out

expeditiously (with any delays justified) and prisoners should be informed within clearly defined

time periods of the action taken to address their concern or of the reasons for considering the

complaint not justified. In addition, statistics on the types of complaints made should be kept as an

indicator to management of areas of discontent within the prison. Of course, prison officers should

be encouraged and empowered as far as possible to respond to requests and queries themselves and

only where this is not possible should recourse to a written procedure be promoted.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities review the prisoner complaints

system in the light of the above remarks.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 46 -

74.

The Parliamentary Ombudsman as the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) under

OPCAT (see paragraph 7 above) carried out regular visits to prisons in Denmark. It also received

and dealt with prisoner complaints. After issuing individual reports on each institution visited in

2011 and 2012, the Parliamentary Ombudsman has now decided to produce only an annual report

which brings together its findings for the previous year on the prison visits it has carried out. In

parallel, it pursues a confidential dialogue on particular issues with the relevant prisons and the

Prison and Probation Department, and other relevant government departments. Moreover, the

Parliamentary Ombudsman intends to address certain thematic issues in the coming period such as

psychiatric care and suicide prevention in prisons.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 47 -

Foreign nationals held under aliens legislation

75.

The CPT’s delegation carried out a targeted follow-up visit to the Ellebæk (formerly

“Sandholm”) Prison and Probation Establishment for Asylum-seekers and Others Deprived of their

Liberty. A description of the establishment and of the categories of persons it held was included in

the report on the CPT’s 2008 visit.

At the time of the 2014 visit, Ellebæk was holding 87 asylum

seekers of whom three were women and, in a separate section, 18 detainees (including one juvenile)

awaiting deportation, for an official capacity of 136. The average stay in 2013 had been 29 days but

one woman had been held in the centre for a year at the time of the visit.

At the outset, the CPT wishes to reiterate that asylum seekers should only be detained as a

last resort, for the shortest possible duration, and after other, less coercive measures have proven

insufficient to ensure the presence of the persons concerned.

76.

The CPT’s delegation received no allegations of physical ill-treatment or verbal abuse by

prison officers.

77.

At the time of the visit, one juvenile was being held in the establishment. The CPT wishes to

recall its position that

every effort should be made to avoid resorting to the deprivation of

liberty of an irregular migrant who is a minor.

Following the principle of the “best interests of

the child”, as formulated in Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child,

detention of children, including unaccompanied children, is rarely justified and, in the Committee’s

view, can certainly not be motivated solely by the absence of residence status.

When exceptionally

a child is detained, the deprivation of liberty should be for the shortest possible period of time;

every effort should be made to allow the immediate release of unaccompanied children from a

detention facility and their placement in more appropriate care. Further, owing to the vulnerable

nature of a child, additional safeguards should apply whenever a child is detained.

This approach has been confirmed by the European Court of Human Rights, which, on

several occasions, has held that the administrative detention of children in an adult detention centre

with a view to their deportation amounted to inhuman treatment.

Taking into account the above principles, the CPT does not consider the Ellebæk

establishment as a suitable location to hold children as it provides neither an appropriate

environment nor does it offer the necessary support that a child requires.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities put an end to the detention of

children at Ellebæk, in the light of the above remarks.

See CPT/Inf (2008) 6, paragraphs 81-97.

See General Comment No. 14 (2013) on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a

primary consideration (Article 3, paragraph 1) by the Committee on the Rights of the Child.

See the 19

General Report on the CPT’s activities: section concerning safeguards for irregular migrants

deprived of their liberty (CPT/Inf (2009) 27, paragraph 97). See also Guideline 22 of the Guidelines of the

Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice adopted on 17 November 2010.

See European Court of Human Rights,

Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium,

judgment of

12 October 2006;

Muskhadzhiyeva and Others v. Belgium,

judgment of 19 January 2010; and

Popov v. France,

judgment of 19 January 2012.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 48 -

78.

The material conditions in the establishment were generally adequate although somewhat

basic and run down. Moreover, the environment was carceral, with barred gate partitions in the

corridors separating one section from another, which is not appropriate for asylum seekers.

Many complaints were heard about the regular meals brought into the establishment, which

did not meet the needs of the diverse detainee population. On the other hand, detainees very much

appreciated the fact that they could cook their own food twice a week.

The regime in place had not changed since 2008, with detained persons able to spend the

whole day out of their room on their unit. All persons were offered at least one hour of outdoor

exercise in the internal courtyards, and a range of basic work, education and sports activities were

offered, and an internet room with five terminals had recently been set up. However, detained

persons complained that sports activities were frequently cancelled due to lack of staff, as was the

case on the day of the visit.

The CPT recommends that efforts be made to maintain the establishment in a decent

state of repair and to limit the carceral environment to a minimum. Further, arrangements

should be made to ensure that regular activities are not cancelled due to lack of staff.

Consideration should also be given to extending the possibilities for detained persons to cook

their own food.

79.

As regards health-care services, they were adequate from Monday to Friday between 8 a.m.

and 4 p.m. when two nurses were on duty, and a general practitioner attended twice a week. Out-of-

hours access to medical care was possible in emergencies but it was the responsibility of the prison

officers to identify whether a detainee required medical attention. Detainees arriving at Ellebæk

after 4 p.m. on a Friday would not see a nurse until Monday and the delay in any admission

assessment could result in delays in treatment. For example, a detainee who arrived on 16 January

2014 was not seen by a doctor for two weeks and was only referred for an existing surgical problem

on 4 February.

The delay in medical screening upon admission was compounded by the fact that the initial

assessment was rather perfunctory and only included how to contact a nurse or an officer when

there was an acute medical problem, and a discussion regarding medication prescribed prior to

arrival in the establishment. No other health-care information was sought and no physical

examination was carried out. Further, the initial screening was carried out in the reception area in

the presence of custodial officers and escort staff.

The importance of medical screening of irregular migrants on admission to a detention

centre cannot be overstated. Such screening is indispensable, in particular in the interests of

identifying those at risk of self-harm, screening for communicable diseases and the timely recording

of any injuries. Testing for blood-borne viruses should be carried out as required as part of the

screening.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 49 -

Moreover, at an establishment such as Ellebæk, it is indispensable that there ought to be

specific screening in place aimed at identifying victims of torture (i.e. that medical doctors should

be familiar with the Istanbul Protocol and know how to document allegations of torture). However,

there was no specific recording or reporting system in place. The results of the survey carried out in

May 2012 by

Amnesty International Denmark’s Medical Group

would appear to confirm both the

need for such screening to be put in place and that proper procedures should exist to manage

vulnerable groups, including as to whether deprivation of liberty is appropriate.

In this connection,

it goes without saying that persons with a severe mental illness should not be detained at Ellebæk.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities ensure that every newly-arrived

detainee is clinically assessed by a medical doctor or by a fully qualified nurse reporting to a

doctor, as soon as possible after his/her admission to Ellebæk. Such health-care screening

should be conducted in an appropriate and confidential setting.

Further, the CPT recommends that specific screening be put in place aimed at

identifying victims of torture, with clear rules on the procedures to be undertaken whenever a

medical practitioner reports on any detained person who may have been the victim of torture.

80.

As regards medical confidentiality issues during consultations and the delivery of

medication,

the same observations made in relation to Western Prison apply to Ellebæk and

should be addressed accordingly

(see paragraph 53 for the relevant recommendation).

81.

The necessity to ensure clear and accurate communication within an immigration detention

centre is essential. However, the CPT’s delegation found that too little use was made of the

possibility for telephone translation services or professional interpreters. Instead, when detainees

were unable to understand a language spoken by custodial or health-care staff, other detainees of the

same nationality or linguistic group would be asked to interpret. This obviously results in a lack of

medical confidentiality and, potentially, a risk of misunderstandings, which could put the health of a

detainee at risk. Detainees may have very legitimate reasons for not wanting another detained

person to act as an interpreter for them with regards to such sensitive matters as health care or other

matters linked to their personal situation. The medical records also showed that at times the health-

care staff merely noted that they could not communicate with the detainee due to language

difficulties.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities make the necessary arrangements

for interpretation services to be provided when required, taking into account the above

remarks.

82.

Nearly all the detainees met by the CPT’s delegation complained about a lack of information

both in relation to the procedures affecting them from the moment they were arrested by the police

as well as about the operation of the establishment in general. Further, several detainees complained

that they did not get clear information from staff when they made a request and that some staff did

not help them in trying to make a complaint.

See Amnesty International Denmark report: “Frihedsberøvede

Asylansøgere i Ellebæk -Traumatiseringsgrad

og helbredstilstand blandt frihedsberøvede asylansøgere i Institutionen Ellebæk”

of February 2013. For an

English summary, see pages 39-40 of the Joint NGO submission in connection with Denmark’s mid-term

reporting on the implementation of the 2011 United Nations Universal Periodic Review recommendations.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 50 -

The ability for detainees to maintain contact with the outside world is essential and the

telephone was considered the preferred means of communication. However, many detainees

complained about the expense and the procedures surrounding the use of the pre-paid phone cards .

In this respect, the CPT sees no reason why detainees should not be allowed to retain their mobile

phones or be provided with a mobile phone without a camera should that be considered a concern,

as occurs in several other European countries. This would facilitate contacts with family and

friends, and be more in line with the ethos of an administrative detention centre where the emphasis

should be on minimum internal security regulations and the promotion of normality.

Another avenue

to explore might be the use of modern technology in facilitating communication between the

immigration detainees and their families (i.e. through Voice over Internet Protocol or Skype).

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities takes steps to improve the provision

of information to irregular migrants from the outset of their detention and that they improve

the possibilities for contact with the outside world such as permitting persons detained at

Ellebæk to possess mobile phones, in the light of the above remarks.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 51 -

Secure institutions for juveniles

Preliminary remarks

83.

There are eight secure institutions for juveniles in Denmark. Seven of them are managed by

the regional authorities under the Consolidation Act on Social Services No. 254 of 20 March 2014

with a total capacity of 126 places.

The other one is managed by the municipality of Copenhagen.

They accommodate both boys and girls from 12 to 17 years of age,

but the placement of juveniles

below the age of criminal responsibility (15 years) is reportedly rare.

Placement in a secure institution for juveniles may be ordered for the following reasons

deriving from either criminal or social law provisions:

- A juvenile is remanded in custody for a severe offence

(“surrogate remand”), which

represents the vast majority of placements;

- a juvenile is sentenced to a regular prison sentence;

- a juvenile is sentenced to a youth sentence;

- a juvenile poses a danger to him/herself or others and the threat of harm is not preventable

by less drastic measures;

- observation in a secure ward is absolutely necessary to determine the appropriate future

social-pedagogical treatment of a juvenile

(“social-pedagogical observation”);

- a long-term social-pedagogical treatment in a secure institution is absolutely necessary for

a juvenile based on the aforementioned social-pedagogical observation period (“social-

pedagogical treatment”);

- a foreign juvenile under the age of 15 without a resident’s permit in Denmark is detained

by the police on the basis of a detention order.

The CPT considers that a secure institution for juveniles is not an appropriate place to

accommodate foreign minors under the age of 15 for the sole reason of not having a resident’s

permit.

The Committee recommends that the law be changed accordingly.

The average period of placement of juveniles in secure institutions in 2012 was 55 days.

Figure for the end of 2012 received from the Ministry for Children, Equality, Integration and Social Affairs.

Juveniles could under certain conditions remain in a secure institution beyond their 18

birthday.

In 2012, nine juveniles aged under 15 were placed in secure institutions, for a maximum of 9 months.

Section 765 of the Danish Administration of Justice Act. In less severe cases, juveniles are accommodated in

open institutions.

For example, 110 out of 119 placements at Sølager in 2012 were juveniles remanded in custody.

Section 78, paragraph 2, of the Consolidation Act on Sentence Enforcement.

Section 74a of the Danish Criminal Code.

Section 30, paragraph 1, sub-paragraph 1, of Executive Order No. 419 of 29 April 2014 on the use of force

against children and juveniles under care (hereinafter “Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force against

juveniles”).

Section 30, paragraph 1, sub-paragraph 1 of Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force against juveniles.

Section 30, paragraph 1, sub-paragraph 3 of Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force against juveniles.

Sections 35 -37 of Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force against juveniles and Section 36 of the Aliens

Act.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 52 -

84.

In the course of the 2014 visit, the CPT’s delegation visited for the first time Grenen and

Sølager Secure Institutions for Juveniles.

The

Secure Institution for Juveniles Grenen,

located near the town of Grenaa in a rural area

in the North East of Jutland, consists of three units (South, North and Kronen) with five places each.

At the time of the visit, the establishment was holding 13 boys and two girls. The “South” unit

accommodated juveniles who were diagnosed with or suspected of suffering from a psychiatric

illness and is the only unit of its kind in the country. The majority of juveniles were being held in

remand custody, with the remainder on preliminary socio-pedagogical observation or long-term

pedagogic-psychological treatment.

The

Secure Institution for Juveniles Sølager

consists of two separate facilities both located

in rural areas in the North of Zealand: one in Hundested and one in Skibby (40 km from

Hundested), both comprising two units and accommodating at the time of the visit 11 boys each for

an official total capacity of 22 places. The vast majority of juveniles were on “surrogate remand”.

85.

The CPT’s delegation was informed by the Ministry for Children, Equality, Integration and

Social Affairs that a Ministerial Committee led by the Director of the Parliamentary Ombudsman’s

office was created in 2013 and mandated to scrutinise the current legislation concerning the

application of forceful measures on juveniles. The Committee is expected to publish its report by

March 2015.

The CPT would like to be informed about the outcome of the work of the

Committee.

Ill-treatment

86.

The delegation received no allegations of ill-treatment by staff in either of the two

establishments visited. On the contrary, many juveniles met by the delegation spoke highly of the

staff and the atmosphere in both institutions was positive.

Nevertheless, several juveniles who were or had previously been at

Grenen

Institution

complained that staff could be too quick to sound the alarm following a verbal altercation which

consequently resulted in force being applied to the juvenile.

The CPT would appreciate the

comments of the Danish authorities on the application of the use of force at the Secure

Institution for Juveniles Grenen.

87.

The delegation also heard about a case of alleged ill-treatment of a juvenile by a social

educator at the Koglen Secure Institution for Juveniles in early December 2013, which was

apparently the subject of a police investigation. By letter of 22 April 2014, the Danish authorities

informed the CPT that the police investigation had been closed after no evidence of ill-treatment

had been found. In a subsequent letter dated 13 May 2014, the Social and Psychiatric Services

Administration of Mid-Jutland Region provided information on the findings of an internal

investigation into the incident, notably that the boy had been particularly provocative towards staff

during the evening and had subsequently attacked one member of staff. The adolescent was

manually restrained by two staff members, and the force used was judged as being strictly necessary

and proportionate.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 53 -

Living conditions

88.

Material conditions in the two institutions were of a high standard and offered a personalised

environment: juveniles had their own rooms in small living units of 5 to 6 residents. All rooms in

both institutions were of an adequate size (between 7 and 15 m²), appropriately furnished (bed,

table, chair, wardrobe, television and DVD player) with sufficient access to natural light and

ventilation. The rooms were also equipped with a call bell. The units had open-plan common

kitchens and spacious, homelike, dining and living areas with sofas, television and games (table

football, billiards and/or ping pong tables).

Sølager,

the rooms were equipped with a fully-partitioned sanitary annexe with a toilet,

sink and shower, while at

Grenen,

each of the three units possessed two bathrooms for five

juveniles. Juveniles at

Grenen

were provided with a flask to use should they need to urinate while

they were confined to their rooms (from 2 to 3 p.m. and 11 p.m. to 7 a.m.). Some of the young

persons interviewed did not know whether they were allowed to ask for access to the toilet at night

or whether they had to use the flask. In the CPT’s view, all juveniles should be provided with ready

access to toilet facilities without undue delay, including at night, and should be informed about this

right.

The CPT recommends that such an approach be rigorously applied.

89.

The pedagogical approach underpinning the regime at both institutions was to promote a

sense of community and to be activity-focussed. The structure and most of the planning of each day

was provided by the establishment, with the aim of relieving the burden of planning from the young

persons and helping them to combat the “chaos” which most of them had experienced prior to their

arrival at the institution. In group meetings, the juveniles were able to make suggestions for various

activities and food.

The young persons at both institutions had to take part in a full day of structured activities:

they attended school and/or workshops during weekday mornings, followed by one hour of rest

time in their rooms and leisure or sports activities with other juveniles and/or staff every afternoon.

In the evenings, juveniles participated in a communal meal and had to agree amongst themselves on

a group activity. At

Grenen,

they also watched the news together. Rooms were locked at night at

Sølager

from 10.30 p.m. to 8 a.m. and at

Grenen

from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. The young persons could

move freely within their units, but had no access to other juveniles’ rooms. At

Grenen,

juveniles

were furthermore only allowed to talk to each other in the presence of a member of staff, and many

juveniles complained about this particular restriction. While such a measure might be deemed

necessary at the outset of a juvenile’s stay at the institution, it should only be maintained based

upon an individual risk assessment. At present, the measure appears to be disproportionate.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities review the application of this

restrictive measure at the Secure Institution for Juveniles Grenen.

90.

Primary and lower secondary school education in small groups was offered to those

juveniles who had not completed their education. The classrooms had computers with internet

access which could be used by the juveniles under supervision. However, none of the teachers was

specialised in teaching juveniles with learning disabilities.

The CPT recommends that efforts be

made by the Danish authorities to take the necessary steps to ensure that at least one teacher

is qualified to teach juveniles with learning disabilities.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 54 -

91.

In addition, the juveniles in both establishments had access to a number of well-equipped

workshops and hobby rooms where they were taught different crafts and arts of their choice (e.g.

metalwork, carpentry, textile printing, silversmithing, sewing and leather work, ceramics,

photography, playing musical instruments).

Juveniles (at all three locations) could furthermore use a variety of impressive indoor and

outdoor sports facilities (e.g. a sports hall, well-equipped indoors gym(s), a football pitch). They

had generally the possibility to exercise outdoors for at least one hour a day, often for longer or

several times a day.

In their living units, the young persons could watch DVDs and play table-football, billiards

and/or table-tennis and were involved in different aspects of daily household chores (notably

cleaning, cooking and washing their own clothes). The young persons met by the delegation

generally had a favourable opinion of the activities on offer.

Health care

92.

Both establishments relied for medical (including dental) care on the regular community

health service. The only exception was psychiatric treatment at

Grenen,

which was provided by a

part-time child and adolescent psychiatrist, who visited the “South” unit every two weeks and the

other units every four weeks (for six hours each). When in need of a medical consultation or

treatment, the juveniles were usually brought to a hospital/surgery (by staff or by the police) or a

doctor was called to the institution. The juvenile’s family doctor was contacted whenever possible.

A few juveniles met by the delegation at both establishments complained about delayed access to a

doctor. One juvenile at

Grenen

alleged that he had been denied access to a doctor following the use

of force by staff.

The CPT recommends that juveniles held at the Secure Institutions for Juveniles

Sølager and Grenen be guaranteed prompt access to a doctor at any time. Further, the CPT

would like to be informed whether there is always someone competent to provide first aid

present at the establishments, including at night.

93.

As regards foreign national juveniles awaiting deportation, the delegation was informed that

they only had the right to medical treatment if they had a life-threatening condition. However, at

Sølager,

the management of the institution would sometimes try to find the financial means to pay

for the treatment, so that the juvenile would not have to suffer.

The CPT recommends that foreign nationals held in Secure Institutions for Juveniles

are provided with free health care and medication similar to that enjoyed by Danish juveniles.

For example, at the Hundested facility of the Secure Institution for Juveniles Sølager, the creative and crafts

activities offered included carpentry, metalwork, textile printing and a very well equipped photo/video/music

workshop.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 55 -

94.

Whenever medication, including psychotropic substances, had to be distributed to a juvenile,

it was administered by the regular staff of the institutions. At both institutions, all staff involved in

the distribution of medication had passed a three-day training course on medication management

and some of them had completed an additional two-day course. The delegation was assured that

medication was always administered according to a prescription, never upon the decision of the

regular staff.

The CPT considers that medicines should preferably be distributed by health-care staff,

since the visibility of medication and its dosage by regular staff could compromise medical

confidentiality. That said, the Committee acknowledges that the daily presence of health-care staff

poses particular challenges for very small establishments, especially when they are located in rural

areas, such as the ones visited.

The CPT trusts that only staff who have been appropriately

trained are tasked with the distribution of medicine.

95.

The delegation was concerned that no medical screening upon admission of the juveniles

took place in either of the establishments visited.

This is an issue that was already highlighted in

the report on the 2008 visit.

Moreover, at

Grenen,

the delegation was informed that a juvenile,

even if injured upon arrival at the institution, would only be medically examined if he or she asked

for it.

In the CPT’s view, all persons entering a place of deprivation of liberty should be medically

assessed upon admission. Such screening is essential, particularly to identify special medical needs,

to prevent suicides and the spread of transmissible diseases, and for recording injuries in good time.

The systematic recording of injuries will make a significant contribution to the prevention of ill-

treatment. This is all the more important when it concerns juveniles.

There is no reason why a proper medical assessment of a juvenile entering a secure juvenile

institution cannot be carried out within 24 hours of their admission. Such an assessment could be

performed by a medical doctor or a fully qualified nurse reporting to a doctor.

The response of the Danish regions of 16 May 2014 to the CPT’s delegation’s preliminary

observations only refers to persons living in the community and not to juveniles deprived of their

liberty, for whom the State has an increased responsibility.

The Committee reiterates its recommendation that steps be taken to ensure that every

newly-admitted juvenile be physically examined by a health-care professional within 24 hours

of his or her admission.

A “Child Protection Examination”, including an evaluation of the child’s/juvenile’s health, is provided by the

Social Services Act for certain juveniles committed to a secure facility for social reasons. The law provides for

this examination “where it must be assumed that a child or young person is in need of special support, partly

due to impaired physical or mental function”. The examination generally takes place prior to the placement in

the secure institution, not upon admission to the establishment. Such an examination is not intended for

juveniles admitted for other than social reasons (including the vast majority of the juveniles who are placed in

secure institutions for pre-trial “surrogate” custody/remand).

See CPT/Inf (2008) 26, paragraph 110.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 56 -

96.

Juveniles at both institutions were offered screening for mental health problems;

Grenen

within the first two weeks and at

Sølager

within the first month of the placement. Both

establishments employed psychologists for this purpose who also took a proactive approach in

persuading juveniles to consent to the screening. Efforts were made to co-ordinate with outside

psychologists or psychiatrists who might previously have seen the juvenile.

97.

Grenen,

the delegation was informed that difficult behaviour in a juvenile was generally

dealt with by behavioural approaches, rather than by medication.

Incidents of self-harm were

responded to by a multi-disciplinary team, who analysed the process and behavioural pattern of the

incident and developed an individual care plan, which frequently involved increased support and

supervision of the juvenile.

Such an approach represents an example of good practice from

which prison establishments might be able to learn.

Other issues

admission

98.

The CPT attaches great importance to the existence of a proper admission procedure in

every place of detention, which should be used by staff for engaging with the detained person to

assess his/her specific needs. This is all the more important when it concerns juveniles.

Grenen,

juveniles were usually confined to their rooms immediately upon admission to

the institution for up to a week or longer before being permitted to participate in any activities with

the rest of the group. During this period, they were only allowed out of their room to go to the

bathroom or to have a cigarette outside with staff, but were not offered any association or access to

outdoor exercise. Moreover, it appeared that this period was not used for discussions or counselling

with staff and that the juvenile was merely left alone in his/her room.

The response of the Danish regions of 16 May 2014 states that confinement of juveniles to

their rooms upon admission was intended to be part of a stabilisation process and that the

“necessary measures” for each juvenile were assessed on an individual basis. However, from the

CPT’s findings, the measure appeared to be routinely applied, for too lengthy a period and with

insufficient engagement by staff.

The CPT recommends that - if needed at all - the period of confinement of a juvenile in

his/her room upon admission should be based on individual assessment and reduced to the

absolute minimum necessary. Furthermore, all young persons should be offered at least one

hour of outdoor exercise every day and human contact and other activities during the

application of the admission measure. The first days of a juvenile’s placement should be used

by staff to engage with the young person so as to assess his/her specific needs and establish a

trusting relationship. Further, the confinement of juveniles to their rooms should be properly

recorded.

Section 34 of Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force against juveniles.

Benzodiazepines and sedatives were reportedly not used at all.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 57 -

99.

At both institutions, an information sheet on the day-to-day activities and procedures was

distributed to juveniles upon admission. The delegation was pleased to hear that further foreign

language versions were under preparation at

Sølager.

The CPT would like to be informed of the

various language versions currently available.

staff

100. A positive aspect at both institutions was that the small living units were well-staffed. On

each unit (at

Grenen

and

Sølager

alike), three staff members were in charge of five or six juveniles

during day-time (and one member of staff during night-time once the juveniles were confined to

their rooms). In addition, teachers and social workers instructed and supported the juveniles at

school and in the workshops.

The large majority of staff were either social educators or had

practical experience in social work (e.g. as street-workers) and reflected the commendable emphasis

the institutions placed on education and rehabilitation rather than on control and security. Moreover,

several staff members had a multi-cultural background, which largely facilitated communication

with juveniles of non-Danish origin.

That said, at

Grenen,

the number of female members of staff employed was insufficient to

ensure a permanent presence of female staff when young women were being held in the

establishment, as was the case at the time of the delegation’s visit.

In the CPT’s view, the presence

of male as well as female staff is not only important for carrying out gender-sensitive tasks, it can

also have a beneficial effect for fostering a degree of normality in a place of detention.

The CPT recommends that the presence of at least one female staff member should be

guaranteed at the Secure Institution for Juveniles Grenen whenever female juveniles are

being accommodated.

security and use of force

101. According to Danish law, three types of “use of force” are authorised in secure institutions

for juveniles if absolutely necessary and their use being proportionate: isolation, manual restraint

(“hold and lead”) and searches of the juvenile or his/her room.

The delegation was pleased to note

that at both institutions, resort to force and disciplinary measures was not excessive.

Sølager, for instance, employed a total of five teachers, two social workers (Socialrådgivere), 40 social

educators (Socialpædagisk personale) and 40 other unit staff (Døgninstitutionsmedhjælper).

The female staff members employed by the institution were two social workers, two unit staff members, the

psychologist and the psychiatrist.

See Section 123, paragraph 1, of the Social Services Act and Sections 20 to 27 of Executive Order no.18 on the

use of force against juveniles.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 58 -

102. Manual restraint and removal of a juvenile to another (usually his/her) room can be used to

prevent him/her from harming him/herself or others or when the young person’s behaviour makes it

irresponsible to allow him/her to remain in the company of other juveniles.

Any form of

mechanical restraint is explicitly forbidden.

The use of manual restraint at

Sølager

has been

decreasing year on year from 41 cases in 2011 to 34 cases in 2012 and 20 cases in 2013. This

downward trend is positive. However, at

Grenen,

the delegation received two allegations of pain-

inducing means of restraint being applied to juveniles with their arms being twisted behind their

backs.

The CPT would like to receive confirmation that all means of manual physical restraint

applied to juveniles are safe and induce as little pain as possible.

103. Searches of the juveniles’ rooms may generally be carried out when they are considered

“necessary to enforce regulations and observe security precautions”, while body searches (limited

by law to tapping over the juvenile’s shirt and examination of pockets and shoes) are only

authorised on the basis of a suspicion that the juvenile possesses banned items.

Sølager,

the

number of searches had gone down between 2011 and 2013 from 59 to 41 and no complaints were

received about the manner in which they were conducted.

However, at

Grenen

complaints were received concerning strip-searches carried out by

police when juveniles were admitted to the institution. Juveniles met by the delegation explained

that they had had to strip completely naked and bend over during the search which took place in the

visits room of each unit. Such an approach is disrespectful and not in line with best practice. Strip

searches should be conducted in such a way as to avoid the juveniles having to be completely naked

(i.e. the juvenile should be able to continue wearing a top while the trousers are removed and

searched and before taking off the top should be permitted to put on the trousers again).

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities ensure that resort to strip searches

is based on an individual risk assessment and subject to rigorous criteria and supervision.

Further, they should review the way in which juveniles are searched upon admission to the

Secure Institution for Juveniles Grenen, in the light of the above remarks.

This is an issue

which needs to be addressed by both the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry for Children, Equality,

Integration and Social Affairs.

Section 2 of Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force against juveniles.

Section 2, paragraph 2, of Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force against juveniles.

Section 123a of the Social Services Act and Sections 21 to 27 of Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force

against juveniles.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 59 -

104. A juvenile can be placed in isolation in a specially designed room for up to four hours if

there is an imminent danger that he/she would harm him/herself or others. If the juvenile suffers

from a mental disorder, he/she must be seen and regularly visited by a psychiatric specialist during

isolation.

Sølager,

an isolation room had existed until some years previously, but the director of the

institution did not recall it having been used during her 26 years of her service. It had meanwhile

been taken out of service. This is positive.

Grenen,

each unit had an isolation room, but isolation was rarely used. Juveniles from the

“South” unit could be placed in isolation for up to four hours and juveniles from the “Kronen” and

“North” unit for up to two hours. During isolation, juveniles were under permanent video

surveillance, the door was always kept ajar and staff viewed the juveniles through a door window

every ten minutes.

The CPT would like to receive the breakdown of the figures of isolation

(number of cases, length) for each of the three units of Grenen for the first half of 2014.

105. At

Sølager,

a juvenile showing particularly disturbing behaviour could be separated from

the other juveniles by being accommodated in a sectioned-off part of the living unit (so-called

“shielding”/“skærmning”) as was the case for one young person during the delegation’s visit.

When a juvenile was accommodated in the “shielded” area, a staff member was permanently

present, but the juvenile could not associate with other juveniles. The juvenile could have his

personal belongings in the room and also stay in a small living area with a sofa and television.

He/she was offered education within the sectioned-off area and daily access to the open air for at

least one hour. According to the staff of the institution, “shielding” could be applied “as long as

necessary” and usually lasted a few days to two weeks (ending gradually by increased association

with the other residents).

The Committee would like to be informed about the frequency and length of

“shielding” at the Secure Institution for Juveniles Sølager for the period June 2012 to June

2014. Further, it wishes to be informed of the procedures and safeguards surrounding this

measure.

106. At both secure institutions, juveniles could be sent to their rooms and excluded from

association with the rest of the group. No maximum duration for the confinement was stipulated.

Grenen,

the delegation was informed that the measure would usually last a few hours to a

full day during which the juvenile was only allowed out of his/her room to go to the bathroom or to

have a cigarette outside. The juvenile was not offered any association or access to outdoor exercise.

Further, most of the juveniles interviewed at

Grenen

complained that confinement to one’s room

was used disproportionately by staff. Several juveniles stated that they had been sent to their rooms

because they had disagreed with a statement by a staff member and that the measure had only ended

once they had expressed agreement with the member of staff. For example, juveniles claimed that

they were sent to their rooms for refusing to eat a particular food or challenging a statement by an

educator over a minor issue such as washing up a cup.

The CPT would like to receive the Danish

authorities’ comments on the approach employed by staff at Grenen juvenile secure

institution with regard to confinement to a room.

Sections 20 and 39, paragraph 2, of Executive Order No. 419 on the use of force against juveniles.

Reportedly because he had intimidated and attacked other juveniles in the institution.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 60 -

107. Police officers were sometimes called to Sølanger for periods up to a few hours to assist in

dealing with particularly agitated or violent young persons. The director of the Secure Institution

Sølager

explained that this was connected to the institution’s emphasis on its social-educational

rather than custodial role. By largely restricting the use of force to the police, the management

aimed at limiting the use of force by staff and thus the overall use of force within the institution.

She was convinced that significant use of force by staff would otherwise compromise the staff’s

pedagogical relationship with the juveniles.

The CPT has doubts over the practice of calling police officers into juvenile institutions to

manage violent situations. The institutions’ staff is in charge of maintaining order within the

institution and should be able to control a violent outburst by one or more juveniles. Indeed, it

appeared that staff at both institutions were in fact trained accordingly and did use force when

necessary to prevent violent incidents.

The CPT would like to receive the Danish authorities’

comments on this matter.

108. Further, according to many juveniles and staff met at both institutions, juveniles were

frequently handcuffed when transported by the police (e.g. when being brought to the institution, to

court or to a dentist), in some cases behind their back. Moreover, staff at Sølanger complained to

the delegation that the handcuffing was not based on an individual assessment. The CPT considers

that handcuffing persons during transportation, and in particular when these are applied behind the

back, is dangerous.

The Committee recommends that handcuffs be only applied on individual grounds,

based on the principle of proportionality and never on a routine basis.

This is an issue that

needs to be addressed by both the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry for Children, Equality,

Integration and Social Affairs.

contact with the outside world

109. At

Sølager,

juveniles were generally allowed to receive visits for eight hours per week and

make several phone calls a day (of 5-10 minutes each). At

Grenen,

the young persons could receive

visits for one and a half hours per week and could use the telephone 20 minutes per day (30 minutes

at weekends).

However, the CPT is concerned that the majority of juveniles in the institutions visited,

namely those in remand custody, remained for lengthy periods under judicial restrictions imposed

by the prosecutor upon the explicit request from the police which impacted on their contacts with

the outside world (see also paragraphs 34 and 35 above).

Such judicial restrictions could include the total prohibition of visits, the prohibition of visits

from persons other than the juvenile’s parents or the requirement for visits to be supervised by the

police or, if permitted, by staff of the secure institution. Only visits by the juvenile’s lawyer could

not be monitored. Also, phone calls could be prohibited or supervised and the content of letters

could be checked and withheld.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 61 -

110. At

Sølager,

the delegation was informed by the management of the institution that juveniles

on remand custody were as a rule at the beginning of their stay (for at least one month) placed under

the highest restriction scheme (“red”). That meant that visits, phone calls and all other

communications were supervised. If the police insisted in supervising a visit themselves (as

opposed to supervision by staff of the institution), juveniles occasionally had to wait for up to ten

days until a visit could be organised. Some juveniles also claimed that they were not allowed to

receive visits at all or to use the telephone.

After the initial placement under the “red” restriction scheme, the contact restrictions were

gradually lifted for many of the juveniles. Some of them, however, stayed under the “red” scheme

for many months (eight months in one case). The delegation met one juvenile who had allegedly

been on that scheme for about a year with all his communications, including visits, being supervised

by the police.

111. The CPT recognises that restrictions on visits and other communications made by juveniles

may be necessary in some cases, either for the purposes of the police investigation or for the

protection of the juvenile concerned. However, in the Committee’s view, this measure should be

used sparingly and for as short a period as possible. Restrictions on contact with the outside world

should never be imposed systematically, but their necessity should always be assessed on a case-by-

case basis. This is all the more important when it concerns juveniles and the necessity for them to

maintain contact with the outside world.

The CPT reiterates its recommendation that the application of limitations on detained

juveniles’ contact with the outside world be reviewed. The imposition of such limitations

should be the exception, not the rule.

complaints and inspections

112. Juveniles at both institutions had a number of avenues of complaint as described in the

CPT’s previous report.

Information on complaints procedures was provided in writing upon

admission. The delegation was pleased to note that at

Grenen,

the information given (on complaints

procedures and also on rules regarding use of force) was followed up within two weeks to ensure

understanding and juveniles were asked to confirm in writing that the information had been

explained.

However, at

Grenen,

not many juveniles used the complaints mechanisms, yet several of

them indicated to the delegation that they had little or no trust in the existing procedures. In the

CPT’s view, staff should foster the young persons’ confidence in the effectiveness of the complaints

system.

The Committee would like to receive the Danish authorities comments on this matter.

See CPT/Inf (2008) 26, paragraph 118.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 62 -

113. As regards inspections, both institutions were visited at least once a year by a newly

established Social Supervisory Authority, which consisted of five municipalities (one for each of

the Danish regions) chosen to supervise the performance of facilities operating under the Social

Services Act.

In addition, the regional authorities carried out periodic inspections and the

Parliamentary Ombudsman and the Section 71 Committee of the Danish Parliament visited secure

institutions for juveniles on a regular basis.

See Sections 2 and 7 of the Act on Social Supervision No. 608 of 12 June 2013.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 63 -

Psychiatric institutions

Preliminary remarks

114. The 2007 Law on the use of coercion in psychiatry (hereinafter Mental Health Act)

was

amended in 2010. Further, an “Executive Order (no.1338) on the use of other coercion and

deprivation of liberty on psychiatric wards” was adopted on 2 December 2010. Together, these legal

provisions further regulate the use of coercion in psychiatry; that is all measures of an involuntary

nature whether involuntary hospitalisation (involuntary admission or retention of a voluntary patient

who requests discharge),

manual restraint and physical immobilisation (fiksering)

. The new

legislative provisions also provide for the use of two special measures at the Secure Department

Nykøbing Sjælland Psychiatric Hospital, namely “walking restraint” and the locking of patients in

their rooms (see paragraphs 142 to 146).

115. In addition, in April 2012, the Danish Government established a Commission on Mental

Health tasked with developing proposals for improving the treatment of psychiatric patients,

including the reduction in the use of coercion in psychiatry. The Commission published its report

in October 2013 and the Danish Government adopted a four-year Action Plan

in May 2014.

Amongst the Action Plan’s objectives are the reduction of immobilisation with belts by 50% before

2020, the introduction of coercion-free units and a “modernisation” of the Mental Health Act (a first

draft to be presented in autumn 2014), which is in particular aimed at strengthening the rights of

patients who are subjected to coercion.

In welcoming these proposals as a clear step in the right

direction, the CPT trusts that the Danish authorities will invest the necessary resources in

psychiatry to implement the plans to reduce the use of coercion.

116. The delegation visited for the first time the Psychiatric Centre Amager in Copenhagen and

the Mental Health Centre Sct. Hans in Roskilde and paid a follow-up visit to the Secure Department

of Nykøbing Sjælland Psychiatric Hospital

117.

Psychiatric Centre Amager,

built in 2001, is located on the outskirts of Copenhagen and

belongs to the large complex of Amager Hospital. It comprises two closed psychiatric wards located

in a modern, purpose-built one-storey wing, each with a capacity of 14 beds. At the time of the visit,

they were accommodating 27 forensic and civil patients. There was also a closed psycho-geriatric

unit.

Consolidation Act no. 1729 of 2 December 2010.

Sections 6 to 10 of the Mental Health Act.

Patients were attached to their bed (or a bed in an isolation room) with an abdominal belt and often

with additional straps to their wrists and/or ankles.

Press release and

report

(in Danish).

The Danish Government’s Action Plan (in Danish):

http://sum.dk

Visited by the CPT in 2002 and 2008.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 64 -

118.

Mental Health Centre Sct. Hans

is located within a park near the centre of Roskilde in

several historic buildings dating back to the turn of the 20

century. It has a total capacity of

180 places. The Forensic Department (“R”) consists of one open and eight closed wards (each

comprising 9 to 12 beds) in different buildings and at the time of the visit it was accommodating 99

patients for an overall capacity of 104 places.

The great majority of patients in the Forensic

Department had been sentenced by a court either to detention or psychiatric treatment. The Forensic

Department planned to move to a modern purpose-built facility in the immediate vicinity of the

present hospital buildings in 2018.

119.

Nykøbing Sjælland Psychiatric Hospital

is located outside the town of Nykøbing Sjælland in

North-Western Zealand. The Secure Department

(“Sikringen”)

receives patients who are

considered too dangerous to be placed in other closed forensic or civil wards in Denmark.

consists of three units with 10 places each which were fully occupied at the time of the visit. There

were also two additional closed forensic wards with 10 beds each outside the Secure Department.

The entire hospital is expected to move to a newly built facility in Slagelse in 2015.

Ill-treatment

120. No allegations were received – and no other evidence was gathered – of deliberate physical

ill-treatment of patients by staff at the three hospitals visited. On the contrary, the atmosphere at the

hospitals was positive and the staff appeared to be dedicated and attentive. Nevertheless, at

Sct.

Hans,

the delegation received a few complaints from patients that staff would occasionally

overreact and that they resorted too quickly to physical force.

121. As regards the use of immobilisation in psychiatric hospitals, the CPT’s delegation noted a

constructive attitude among its interlocutors, and an overall acknowledgement both by the central

authorities and the staff in the hospitals visited of the need to reduce the resort to immobilisation

(and coercion in general).

However, despite measures taken to tackle the frequent use and length of immobilisation in

psychiatric hospitals, such as increased staff training and certain legislative amendments, there had

been no reduction in the registered use of immobilisation in Denmark. On the contrary, the

instances of immobilisation, and notably those of prolonged immobilisation (for more than 48

hours), has steadily increased and reached all-time peaks in 2012 and 2013 on a national level. The

CPT therefore remains seriously concerned about the frequent and prolonged use of immobilisation

in psychiatric hospitals.

Of the 104 places in the forensic department, 77 were in the closed wards and 27 in the open ward.

All but one patient at

Sikringen

were diagnosed with schizophrenia.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 65 -

For instance, at

Sct. Hans,

a patient had been immobilised five times for periods ranging

from three to 38 days, for a total of 87 days and at

Amager,

one patient had been immobilised for 34

days. The CPT also received reports that psychiatric patients had been fixated to a bed for several

months in different psychiatric hospitals pending their transfer to

Sikringen.

In one such case, a

patient had been immobilised for more than 100 days at

Sct. Hans

(from 28 February to 11 June

2012).

Once at

Sikringen,

he had been restrained for a further one week upon his arrival and when

the restraints were removed, he required training to walk properly again.

Moreover, at

Sct. Hans,

staff told the delegation that due to low staffing levels, patients

could at times be immobilised when such a measure might have been avoided with higher staffing

levels, and that for the same reason a patient who had been restrained for several months had not

been released from the belts as often as his condition would have allowed. Clearly such a state of

affairs is not acceptable.

In the CPT’s view, the duration of the actual means of restraint should be for the shortest possible

time (usually minutes to a few hours), and should always be terminated when the reason for the use

of restraint has ceased. The maximum duration of the application of mechanical restraint should

ordinarily not exceed 6 hours. As pointed out in the reports on the CPT’s 2002 and 2008 visits to

Denmark,

the Committee considers that applying instruments of physical restraint to

psychiatric patients for days on end cannot have any medical justification and amounts to ill-

treatment.

122. According to Section 15 of the Mental Health Act, immobilisation is as a rule to be decided

by a doctor. Only in emergency situations could a patient be restrained to a bed with an abdominal

belt upon the authorisation of a nurse while the doctor has to be called immediately. During

immobilisation, one staff member has to be permanently located near the patient (while as far as

possible respecting his/her privacy).

The need for continuation of the measure of immobilisation

has to be medically assessed at least four times a day in evenly-spaced intervals by a doctor. A

second doctor has to authorise the continuation of immobilisation beyond 48 hours; however, such

authorisation is thereafter obligatory only once a week.

In the Committee’s view, a restraint

approval based on the patient’s physical and mental condition is of little value if it is several days

old.

Moreover, the documentation examined by the delegation showed that in the case of a

patient who had been continually immobilised for a period of 34 days at

Amager,

authorisation in

writing by a second doctor had only been provided twice during the whole period. Indeed, staff

were of the opinion that only one such authorisation was required, even if the patient was restrained

for more than a month.

Existing legal safeguards must be rigorously enforced.

During that time he had been released 110 times for periods ranging from 10 minutes to one hour.

CPT/Inf (2002) 18 paragraph 76 and CPT/Inf (2008) 26 paragraph 126.

Section 21 of Executive Order no.1338 on the use of other coercion.

Section 22, paragraphs 2 and 3 of Executive Order no.1338 on the use of other coercion.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 66 -

123. The second doctor’s authorisation was usually provided by a psychiatrist from a different

ward within the same hospital. In case of disagreement between the treating and the second doctor

as to the need for continuing the immobilisation, the law provides that the treating doctor’s opinion

prevailed.

In the Committee’s view, such a disagreement is a serious matter and should

automatically lead to a referral to a third authority for a decision. An independent scrutiny should

not rely on the second doctor’s or the patient’s ability and willingness to appeal.

124. The release of an immobilised patient from belt restraint could be authorised by a nurse

without consulting a doctor. This is positive, as it helps avoid the measure lasting longer than is

absolutely necessary.

However, the legislative amendments do not explicitly stipulate that the application of

immobilisation should stop as soon as the danger of harm has passed

and no maximum duration

for immobilisation has been introduced. From the documentation examined, the delegation found

that patients were frequently immobilised for 47 hours. The frequent termination of immobilisation

just before the requirement for the second doctor’s assessment may raise questions as to the genuine

necessity of applying the measure for the whole 47 hours. Moreover, at

Amager,

staff told the

delegation that the release of a patient from immobilisation depended inter alia on the situation on

the ward, such as the presence of other particularly demanding patients, staffing levels and the

female/male staff ratio on the shift. Such a state of affairs, if accurate, would not be acceptable.

125. The CPT again calls upon the Danish authorities to review the legislation and practice

of immobilising psychiatric patients and in particular to ensure that immobilisation with a

belt:

is only used as a last resort to prevent risk of harm to the patient or to others;

is applied for the shortest possible time (usually minutes rather than hours)

and is always terminated as soon as the danger of harm has passed; the

maximum duration should ordinarily not exceed six and under no

circumstances exceed 24 hours;

is never applied or its application prolonged due to a shortage of staff;

is subject to regular review by a second doctor in case of an exceptional

prolongation of immobilisation beyond the six hours limit, and thereafter at

reasonably frequent intervals; and that in cases of disagreement between the

treating and the second doctor about the prolongation of immobilisation, the

matter be automatically referred to an independent third authority for

decision. The same procedure should apply if the use of mechanical restraint

is repeated within 24 hours following the termination of a previous measure of

restraint.

Section 21, paragraph 5 of the Mental Health Act and Section 22, paragraph 7 of Executive Order no.1338 on

the use of other coercion.

It is only stipulated that, under the responsibility of the head doctor, “coercion may not be used to a greater

extent than necessary to obtain the intended purpose” (Section 4, paragraph 4 and Section 21, paragraph 1 of

the Mental Health Act).

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 67 -

126. All instances of immobilisation were recorded in the hospitals visited in a special protocol

regardless of the length of their application and the measure was according to staff applied out of

the sight of other patients. However, two patients at

Amager

and

Sct. Hans

met by the delegation

stated that they had each witnessed another patient being restrained.

The CPT trusts that the

Danish authorities will ensure that immobilisation does not take place in view of other

patients.

Further, patients at

Sct. Hans

and

Sikringen

were regularly offered a debriefing after having

been subjected to immobilisation. At

Amager,

this was still not systematically the case, but the

delegation was assured that a regular debriefing would be introduced in the near future.

The CPT

would like to receive confirmation that this is the case now.

127. The CPT was informed that the police were occasionally called to the closed wards at

Amager

and

Sct. Hans

to help staff in dealing with agitated patients. In their response of 21 May

2014 to the preliminary observations made by the CPT’s delegation, the Ministry of Health

explained that such interventions occurred at

Sct. Hans

on average every second month and at

Amager

every third month, and that police used force in these situations only once in two or three

years. Nevertheless,

in the CPT’s view, hospital staff should be sufficient in number and

appropriately trained to handle violent situations without recourse to the police.

128. In at least one case at

Sct. Hans,

a police intervention apparently involved the application of

pepper spray inside a hospital ward. According to the medical documentation, police had dispersed

pepper spray in a patient’s face after he had succeeded in freeing himself from their grip and

subsequently handcuffed him. The patient claimed that due to being handcuffed he had had

difficulties to wash his eyes in order to relieve the symptoms of the spray and that he then suffered

from sore eyes for several days. In the CPT’s view, it is totally inappropriate for pepper spray to be

used in a hospital setting. Its use could only be justifiable in a life-threatening situation.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take the necessary action to ensure

that pepper spray is only ever authorised inside a hospital when there is a real risk of threat

to life.

Staff

129. The question of whether a hospital is able to provide treatment and care to its patients is to a

large measure dependent upon it having a sufficient number of properly trained staff. It is

regrettable that the situation as regards staffing levels in the hospitals visited had not improved

since the CPT’s 2008 visit.

For instance, at

Amager,

only one nurse and three to four caregivers were present in the

daytime at each of the closed wards which were accommodating some 14 patients. A similar

situation was found at

Sct. Hans

where only one or two nurses, supported by two to three

caregivers, were on duty during the day in wards accommodating 9 to 12 patients.

This was acknowledged by the Danish authorities as a country-wide problem; see also their response to the

report on the CPT’s 2008 visit, CPT/Inf (2009) 12, page 52.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 68 -

The shortage of nursing staff was even more problematic at

Sikringen,

given that this high-

security institution holds the most challenging psychiatric patients in Denmark. According to the

information received, wards accommodating 10 patients were frequently staffed during the day

(7 a.m. to 3 p.m.) by five to six nursing staff out of which usually only one or two were nurses.

After 3 p.m. and during weekends, one nurse was on duty for all three wards until 11 p.m. usually

assisted by three or four caregivers per ward (of which two were male).

In addition, one member

of the security staff was permanently assigned to each ward.

130. As regards psychiatrists, the delegation was told about serious recruitment problems in each

of the hospitals visited.

At the two closed wards at

Amager,

two psychiatrists and three other doctors were assigned

to four and a half posts and another half a psychiatrist’s post was vacant.

Sct. Hans

employed seven

psychiatrists and three additional doctors for its nine forensic wards. One psychiatrist’s post had

been vacant for a year. At

Sikringen,

two psychiatrists (one of them working only 50%) were

supported by the head of the hospital who worked for 10% of her time on the three secure wards

and by a foreign psychiatrist who was hired on a part-time contract (33%), but was not yet fully

operational due to his very basic knowledge of Danish. Half a psychiatrist’s post was vacant at the

time of the visit. During afternoon and night shifts and at weekends, a junior doctor was always

present at the department.

131. As a consequence of the low staffing levels, the delegation observed that staff at all three

hospitals were under constant time pressure, which resulted in a lack of outdoor exercise and

activities offered to patients. For instance, staff at

Sct. Hans

told the delegation that sometimes,

when one patient needed particular attention, e.g. because he/she was being restrained, the other

patients on the ward were only infrequently taken to the outdoor yard. Moreover, at

Sikringen

and

Sct. Hans,

as staff themselves admitted, the low staffing levels could at times lead them to resort to

the application of means of restraint, when such a measure might have been avoided with higher

staffing levels.

132. Generally, the delegation received the impression that many shortcomings in the

establishments visited were at least partly due to low staffing levels. According to the experience of

the delegation’s psychiatric members, staff numbers on comparable wards in other countries (such

as the United Kingdom, Norway and Iceland) were significantly higher and the resort to restraint

much lower than in Denmark. Moreover, the CPT is concerned that at none of the hospitals,

including the two new construction projects at

Sct. Hans

and Slagelse, is a reinforcement of the

current staffing levels envisaged.

The CPT calls upon the Danish authorities to reinforce staffing levels in the psychiatric

establishments visited, and notably the number of nurses. Further steps should be taken to fill

the vacant psychiatrists’ posts at all three establishments as a matter of urgency.

At night, one nurse was on duty in all three wards, together with one (male) nursing staff on each ward.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 69 -

133.

Sikringen

continued to employ 18 security guards from a private security firm, at least partly

because of its long-standing difficulties in recruiting male health-care staff. The guards had

undergone a four-week training course and wore civilian clothes. The Department’s management

was pleased with their presence on the wards. They were not involved in nursing tasks, but

supported staff in daily chores such as serving food and waste disposal or playing board games with

patients in the living rooms.

The CPT would like to know if the employment of security staff

from a private company is further envisaged for the new Secure Department at Slagelse and,

if so, to be informed about any safeguards or guidelines in place regulating such employment.

134. Commendable efforts had been made to intensify staff training. Staff at all three hospitals

received regular de-escalation training and periodically underwent courses in non pain-compliant

manual restraint techniques. In addition, courses in cognitive behavioural therapy had been

scheduled at

Sct. Hans

and

Amager.

Staff themselves were of the opinion that the training had

enabled them to resort to restraint less frequently. This is positive.

Sikringen,

half of the staff had also attended communication skills training which had

reportedly had led to an increased sense of professionalism in interacting with the patients and had

contributed to a more relaxed atmosphere on the wards.

Patients’ living conditions

135. Material conditions in

Sct. Hans

and

Sikringen

were generally good, while at

Amager

they

were exemplary: each room at Amager had a modern sanitary annexe with toilet, sink and shower

and patients had free access to a small paved inner yard (mainly used for smoking). Wards at all

three hospitals had spacious, light and well-equipped individual rooms and accommodated both

male and female patients.

Sct. Hans

and at

Sikringen,

most of the patients only had access to

common bathrooms. The CPT’s delegation was pleased to learn that the shortage of bathrooms for

patients currently staying at

Sikringen

will be remedied at the new Secure Department in Slagelse

where all rooms will include sanitary annexes. This will also put an end to the current practice of

locked-up patients having to use a flask if they need to urinate at night.

The wards had nicely decorated common rooms and all three establishments possessed

pleasant exercise yards. However, some of the yards at

Sct. Hans

did not provide shelter against

inclement weather. The delegation was informed that the large inner yard at the new forensic

facility will be partly sheltered.

In the meantime, efforts should be made to equip the outdoor

exercise yards at Sct. Hans with a shelter from inclement weather pending the opening of the

new forensic facility.

136.

On a positive note, the food in all the institutions visited was praised by patients.

Patients did not have access to other patients’ rooms.

Ten patients were sharing two toilets and one shower. See also CPT/Inf (2008) 26.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 70 -

Treatment

137. All patients at the three establishments received treatment based on an individualised

approach

and staff worked in multidisciplinary therapeutic teams. However, the shortage of staff

(see section 3 above) had a detrimental impact on the overall quality of the treatment in the

establishments visited.

138. Patients in all three hospitals could participate in some activities, including occupational

therapy, but the overall range and frequency of activities on offer was rather limited.

Amager,

patients were mainly offered sports activities two to three times a week in a

modern gym, and a cooking group as well as a social gathering (“café”) of patients from both closed

wards took place once a week. However, in general, patients spent most of their time in forced

idleness on their wards.

Sct. Hans,

several leisure facilities (greenhouse, workshops, library) had been closed

down in recent years and a spacious modern sports hall was only infrequently used by patients from

the closed wards due to a lack of staff to escort and accompany them. Patients and staff further

stated that they rarely had the opportunity to spend time together within and outside the wards (e.g.

for walks into town, to play board games or chat). The delegation was also told that too little social

and practical training was offered to patients and that requests for discharge were often rejected by

the courts due to the perceived lack of social abilities of the patients.

Sikringen,

the activities offered consisted mainly of volleyball and badminton, half an

hour of physical exercise in the yard and a creative workshop (all once a week), spinning (twice a

week), and regular visits from a music therapist.

Moreover, staff on the wards stated that there

was very little time for them to talk to patients, to cook or to play games together.

The Committee considers that the treatment of psychiatric patients should involve a wide

range of rehabilitative and recreational activities. Occupational therapy should be an integral part of

the rehabilitation programme, providing for motivation, development of learning and relationship

skills, acquisition of specific competences and improvement of self-image. It is also desirable for

patients to be offered education and suitable work.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take the necessary steps to provide

all patients with a wide range of rehabilitative and recreational activities as part of their

treatment plan.

139. Access to outdoor exercise was also limited in all three establishments, mainly due to the

lack of staff. For example, at

Amager,

the delegation met two patients who alleged that they had not

been offered access to the outdoor exercise yard since their admissions 13 and 7 days earlier

respectively.

Amager,

the management had in addition increased the involvement of patients by inviting them to staff

meetings when their case was being discussed.

A few patients also received education.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 71 -

Sct. Hans,

the delegation was informed that almost all patients had to be accompanied

when going to the outdoor yards (mostly in order to prevent them from receiving drugs through the

fences), which placed a considerable burden on the already understaffed units. One patient alleged

that she was granted outdoor exercise only twice a week and staff told the delegation that some

patients who were repeatedly caught using cannabis were not granted outdoor exercise for several

months. At one ward, staff told the delegation that patients were usually allowed outside three to

four times per week in summer and once a week in winter.

Sikringen,

access to the fresh air was additionally hampered by the fact that there was

only one yard available per ward of 10 patients while certain patients could not go outside at the

same time as other patients due to their condition, thus rendering the yard inaccessible for other

patients during that time period. In particular many of the locked-up patients at

Sikringen

(approximately 50% of all patients) were not offered one hour of outdoor exercise every day.

Moreover, patients placed in an isolation room were generally not offered access to the open air at

all during such a placement.

The restricted access to the yards at

Sikringen

was particularly regrettable for several

patients who had been locked up in their rooms for months or even years and who had been tense

and violent inside their rooms, but reportedly were calm when in the yard. It is a paradox that

patients are confined to their rooms for years due to their behaviour which appears to vanish when

they are allowed outside their room in the garden.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take the necessary steps to ensure

that all patients are offered at least one hour of outdoor exercise every day.

140. As regards medication, the CPT’s delegation was impressed by a new database for

monitoring the use of medication. The database stores information on medication administered to

individual patients (drugs, doses, drug combinations, “PN” medication

), and also allows the

hospital administrations and health authorities to obtain an immediate overview of the use of

medication, by ward, by hospital, by region or by individual doctor. Alerts appear when overdoses

or adverse drug combinations are administered or when other pre-defined unwanted events occur.

Reportedly, the use of certain medication, high doses and polypharmacy had dropped significantly

in those regions where the database was already in use.

This is a positive development.

141. Electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) could be applied against the patient’s will if he/she was in

an actual or potentially life-threatening situation

and was always applied in its modified form (i.e.

with anaesthetics and muscle relaxants). According to the country-wide statistics, involuntary ECT

was applied about 80 -100 times per year. The CPT considers that such frequency of involuntary

treatment is high in a country which has in total 3000 beds in psychiatric hospitals.

The CPT

would like to receive the Danish authorities’ comments regarding the frequent application of

involuntary ECT.

“PN” stands for

per necessitatem,

Latin for “as needed”, in this context: medication not taken regularly, but as

required.

For example, the registered use of neuroleptics had reportedly decreased by 20% and the number of patients

taking olanzapine has gone down from 20% of patients to 5% since the introduction of the database.

Section 8 of Executive Order no.1338 on the use of other coercion.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 72 -

Special restraint measures at the Secure Department of Nykøbing Sjælland

Psychiatric Hospital (Sikringen)

142. The 2010 amendments to the Mental Health Act legalised two specific coercive measures,

namely “walking restraint”

and the locking of patients in their rooms

to be used exclusively at

Sikringen.

143. “Walking-restraint” entails using a special belt to attach the patient’s wrists and ankles to a

waist belt (and if necessary additionally the wrists to each other) by straps. This allows the patient

to walk around and move his/her arms to a limited degree.

“Walking-restraint” may only be applied with the formal permission of the Danish Health

and Medicine Agency (Sundhedsstyrelsen). Upon the request of a psychiatrist from the department,

two additional external psychiatrists meet the patient and subsequently discuss the request with

members of an Expert Board

of the Danish Health and Medicine Agency, who finally decides

upon the request.

The permission for the application of “walking-restraint” is valid for six months,

after which the application process has to start anew, with an additional, fourth, external psychiatrist

involved.

144. At the time of the visit, “walking-restraint” was regularly being applied to four patients in

the department. It was usually applied to those patients twice a day for 30-60 minutes and

depending on their condition for personal hygiene (shower), outdoor walks

and/or socialising with

other patients in the ward’s living room. While a patient was in “walking-restraint”, he/she was

always accompanied by a specially assigned staff member (fastvagt). A psychiatrist visited each of

the patients every day including on weekends and an external psychiatrist came once a week, in

order to verify if the conditions for applying the special belt were still met and whether it should be

continued.

All patients to whom “walking-restraint” was applied, had previously been locked almost

permanently in their rooms

and/or restrained to their beds, for extended periods (weeks or months

and a few patients had been locked in their rooms even for several years). They had not been able to

socialise with other patients, to shower or to access the outdoor yard on a regular basis. Therefore,

the patients themselves perceived the “walking-restraint” as an improvement to their previous

situation.

Section 18c of the Mental Health Act.

Section 18b of the Mental Health Act.

The Expert Board consisted of a professor in psychiatry, two to three psychiatric specialists and one

representative of a user organisation (SIND).

At the time of the visit, all requests for application of “walking-restraint” had been approved by the Agency.

One patient had even received permission for accompanied walks outside the closed yards on the hospital

grounds.

They were usually only released to go to the bathroom and the outdoor yard.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 73 -

The delegation gained the overall impression that the three-year experiment of using

walking belts had been handled well, with appropriate supervision and outside monitoring and as

much respect for patients’ dignity as possible. Nevertheless the utmost care should be taken to

ensure that “walking-restraint” is exclusively applied to patients whose condition requires restraint

and the measure should be ended as soon as it is no longer necessary. As with any other form of

restraint, it should never be applied to compensate for shortages of trained staff. Moreover, in the

CPT’s view, “walking-restraint” should not be a substitution for more modern, professional and less

restrictive methods to control violent behaviour.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities take into consideration the above

remarks with a view to reducing resort to mechanical restraint; such a reduction should not

be achieved through an increased recourse to isolation measures.

145. The locking of patients in their rooms was explicitly authorized by the new legislation for

half an hour during the staff lunch break and for one and a half hours during the weekly staff

meetings.

Moreover, on average some five patients were constantly locked-up on each ward (and

only released to go to the bathroom or to the outdoor yard); some of them had been subject to such a

regime for several years. Patients further told the delegation that newly arriving patients were

frequently locked-up for days or even weeks on end. According to staff, the incidence of locking of

patients in their rooms had increased (while immobilisation had been reduced).

146. The measure of locking a patient in his or her room is decided by a doctor.

However, the

law does not provide for a regular review of that measure. The CPT’s delegation was told by the

management of

Sikringen

that every patient’s condition and treatment, including the need for

continued locking-up, was discussed every six weeks during the ward staff meetings.

The law further required that every locked-up patient had to be offered human contact for

ten minutes every hour. Due to security considerations, between two and four staff members were

needed to open a door to a locked-up patient’s room, which meant that a large percentage of the

staff on duty was required to carry out this task. Staff admitted that their tight routines in caring for

the patients resembled a train timetable with precise timings for every task and that they were

relieved that some of the locked-up patients regularly declined the offer for contact.

The CPT acknowledges the difficulties that Sikringen faces in dealing with its particularly

challenging patient population. Nevertheless, the Committee is seriously concerned by the fact that

often some 50 % of the patients remained more or less continuously locked in their rooms, apart

from going to the bathroom and very limited access to the outdoor yard, throughout the day.

Further, some patients have been subject to such a regime for months or even years. Locking-up of

patients should be very cautiously applied, as a measure of last resort and applied for the shortest

possible time; at Sikringen it is used excessively.

The CPT recommends that the Danish authorities make every effort to radically

reduce the resort to locking patients in their rooms for extensive periods of the day at the

Secure Department of Nykøbing Sjælland Psychiatric Hospital. It should be applied to the

absolute minimum necessary and always on an individual basis, and accompanied by

appropriate safeguards, in particular through provision for a regular formal review. Locking

of patients should never be resorted to due to lack of staff. The alternative to locking-up is

clearly not an increased use of physical immobilisation.

Section 18b of the Mental Health Act.

Section 18a, paragraph 4 of the Mental Health Act.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 74 -

Safeguards

147. The Danish legislation provides a series of formal safeguards (including for involuntary

hospitalisation) which can be considered as largely adequate. This section will therefore focus on

the areas which still require improvement.

148. The 2010 amendments to the Mental Health Act have strengthened the rights of patients in

relation to involuntary measures (hospitalisation or treatment). The new law now considers a

measure involuntary whenever the patient does not give his/her informed consent,

which is an

advance on a patient having to “actively” or verbally oppose the measure as previously required. It

is commendable that patients who might not be able to show their active or verbal opposition or

who are fearful or easily suggestible, now also enjoy the safeguards accorded to involuntary

measures.

149. Likewise, patients’ possibilities to appeal against a transformation from voluntary to

involuntary hospitalisation have been further strengthened by the 2010 amendments. However, the

CPT remains concerned that the retention of a voluntarily admitted patient can still be decided by

only one doctor.

Further, a patient’s request for discharge has to be responded to by the head doctor only “as

soon as possible and at least within 24 hours”.

In the CPT’s view, the rule should be that a

voluntarily admitted patient is either able to leave the hospital immediately upon his/her request or,

if the conditions for involuntary retention are met, the procedure for involuntary hospitalisation is

initiated.

The CPT recommends that legislation and practice are brought in line with this

approach.

The Committee further reiterates its recommendation that the retention of a

voluntarily admitted patient requires an opinion from a second doctor who is independent of

the department accommodating the patient.

The aim should be to align the safeguards offered in

such cases with those of other involuntary patients.

150. Moreover, if the application of restraint to a voluntary patient is deemed necessary, the legal

status of the patient as “voluntary” should be reviewed. This would secure the patient’s safeguards

under Danish law. For instance at

Sct. Hans,

the delegation learned that immobilisation was at times

applied to voluntary patients at the open department “M” (for voluntary patients with dual

diagnosis).

The CPT recommends that whenever restraint is applied to a voluntary patient, the

legal status of that patient should be reviewed.

Section 6, paragraph 2 and Section 12, paragraph 5 of the Mental Health Act.

Section 10.3 of the Mental Health Act. If the request is filed within the first 24 hours of a voluntary admission,

the head doctor shall announce the decision within 48 hours of the involuntary admission.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 75 -

151. Patients could lodge complaints with the hospital management and a number of outside

bodies, in particular the Patient Complaints Board and the Patient Appeals Board (as 2

instance)

as well as with the Parliamentary Ombudsman.

The examination of annual reports from the Patient Complaints Board

of Sjælland Region

showed a number of hospital decisions on involuntary hospitalisations, forced medication and the

use of restraint had been overruled by the Board.

However, it is unclear whether the overruled

decisions have a wider impact on the way in which the hospitals concerned practice the application

of coercion.

The CPT would like to be informed whether there are any wider policy

implications emerging from the individual Board decisions.

152. The CPT remains concerned that guardians (bistandsværge), appointed to assist forensic

patients in the exercise of their rights, were in many cases the patients’ family members who

reportedly often lacked the necessary skills to advise the patient properly, in particular in filing

complaints (e.g. against the use of coercion). Further, there may be a conflict of interest when a

family member is appointed as a guardian. Only a few of the forensic patients had an additional

patient advisor appointed to them.

The CPT reiterates its recommendation to ensure that all forensic patients and

patients subject to physical immobilisation benefit from the appointment of a representative

with the necessary skills and duties to support him/her effectively in the exercise of his/her

patient’s rights in accordance with Danish law.

The delegation was informed that the various regional Patient Complaints Boards had recently merged into one

single Patient Complaints Board to ensure more homogeneous decision-making.

For instance, of the board’s 846 decisions (regarding 492 complainants) in the years 2010 to 2012, a total of 55

decisions on involuntary hospitalisation, 36 decisions on involuntary medication and 51 decisions on the use of

restraint had been overruled.

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 76 -

APPENDIX

LIST OF THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES

AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS

WITH WHICH THE CPT'S DELEGATION HELD CONSULTATIONS

National authorities

Ministry of Children, Gender Equality, Integration and Social Affairs

Jesper ZWISLER

Dorte BECH VIZARD

Jørgen WITSØ-LUND

Charlotte AVNSTED

Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Martin BANG

Head of Section, Human Rights Department, and CPT

Liaison Officer

Permanent Secretary of State

Head of Office

Chief Consultant

Legal Advisor and CPT Liaison Officer

Ministry of Health

Dorthe SØNDERGAARD

Lise KIERKEGAARD

Louise FILT

Vagn NIELSEN

Anne Mette DONS

Deputy Permanent Secretary

Chief Consultant

Head of Section and CPT Liaison Officer

Director, Danish Health and Medicine Authority

Head of Department of Supervision, Danish Health and

Medicine Authority

Ministry of Justice

Kim LUNDING

Frederik GAMMELTOFT

Anne Berg MANSFELD-GIESE

Thomas TORDAL-MORTENSEN

Ketilbjørn HERTZ

Casper GRUE

Morten Chjeffer RASMUSSEN

Lisbeth Sandbjerg HANSEN

Anders JØRGENSEN

Christina Fløystrup LILLIECREUTZ

Deputy Permanent Secretary of State

Head of Division

Deputy Head of Division

Consultant

Head of Section

Head of Section and CPT Liaison Officer

Head of Legal Department, Danish National Police

Senior Advisor, Danish National Police

PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files

- 77 -

Johan Reimann

Annette ESDORF

Peter VESTERHEDEN

Mohammad AHSAN

Eva Rønne NIELSEN

Director General, Danish Prison and Probation Service

Deputy Director General, Danish Prison and Probation

Service

Governor of Copenhagen Prisons

Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions

Assistant Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions

Independent Police Complaints Authority

Kirsten DYRMAN

Rasmus BLAABJERG

Director

Head of Division

Office of the Parliamentary Ombudsman

Morten ENGBERG

Bente MUNDT

Erik Dorph SØRENSEN

Head of Inspections Division

Head of Children’s Department

Chief Legal Advisor

Non-governmental Organisations

Amnesty International Denmark

Citizens Commission on Human Rights Denmark

Danish Institute for Human Rights

Danish Refugee Council

DIGNITY – Danish Institute against Torture

Disabled Peoples’ Organisations Denmark

KRIM

LAP

Refugees Welcome

SIND