Individuelt nationalt faktaark. År: 2013
Denmark
1. Percentage of Gross Domestic Product
(GDP) on Defence
2. Percentage of Defence Expenditure on
Major Equipment and Associated Research
and Development
3A. Percentage of Implementation of
Quantitative National Targets (Year:
2016)
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
3B. Percentage of Implementation of
Qualitative National Targets (Year: 2016)
7, 8, 9
Selected Indicator
Defence Expenditures
(current prices, mil. of national
currency):
Major Equipment Expenditures
(current prices, mil. of national
currency):
Absolute
Value
25.572
2.529
-
-
Contribution (%)
1,37
9,89
99,71
72,67
64,85
72,73
100,00
11,40
12,12
9,09
12,35
NATO
Guideline
(%)
2
20
100
100
50
40
80
10
8
28
Rank
Middle
Bottom
Top
Bottom
Top
Top
Top
Top
Middle
Middle
Middle
4A. Deployable Land Forces Personnel as
a Percentage of Land Forces Personnel
4B. Deployable Airframes as a Percentage
of Airframes
4C. Deployable Vessels as a Percentage of
Vessels
5A. Sustainable Land Forces Personnel as
a Percentage of Land Forces Personnel
5B. Sustainable Airframes as a Percentage
of Airframes
5C. Sustainable Vessels as a Percentage of
Vessels
6A. Land Forces Personnel Deployed
Abroad on NATO Operations as a
Percentage of Deployable Land Forces
Personnel
6B. Land Forces Personnel Deployed
Abroad on non-NATO Operations as a
Percentage of Deployable Land Forces
Personnel
6C. Land Forces Personnel Deployed
Abroad on NATO and non-NATO
Operations as a Percentage of Deployable
Land Forces Personnel
7A. Airframes Deployed Abroad on NATO
Operations as a Percentage of Deployable
Airframes
7B. Airframes Deployed Abroad on non-
NATO Operations as a Percentage of
Deployable Airframes
7C. Airframes Deployed Abroad on NATO
and non-NATO Operations as a
Percentage of Deployable Airframes
8A. Vessels Deployed Abroad on NATO
Operations as a Percentage of Deployable
Vessels
8B. Vessels Deployed Abroad on non-
NATO Operations as a Percentage of
Deployable Vessels
8C. Vessels Deployed Abroad on NATO
and non-NATO Operations as a
Percentage of Deployable Vessels
9. Percentage of fulfilment of NATO
Command Structure (NCS) positions
10. Percentage of Fulfilment of NATO
Force Structure Headquarters
11. Percentage of Immediate Response
Force (IRF) Fulfilment
Deployable Land Forces
Personnel (unit):
Deployable Airframes (unit):
Deployable Vessels (unit):
Sustainable Land Forces
Personnel (unit):
Sustainable Airframes (unit):
Sustainable Vessels (unit):
Land Forces Personnel Deployed
Abroad on NATO Operations
(unit):
Land Forces Personnel Deployed
Abroad on non-NATO
Operations (unit):
Land Forces Personnel Deployed
Abroad on NATO and non-NATO
Operations (unit):
Airframes Deployed Abroad on
NATO Operations (unit):
Airframes Deployed Abroad on
non-NATO Operations (unit):
Airframes Deployed Abroad on
NATO and non-NATO
Operations (unit):
Vessels Deployed Abroad on
NATO Operations (unit):
Vessels Deployed Abroad on
non-NATO Operations (unit):
Vessels Deployed Abroad on
NATO and non-NATO
Operations (unit):
5.687
48
11
1.000
8
1
703
34
0,60
Middle
737
12,95
Middle
1,25
0,00
1,25
0,58
0,06
0,63
-
-
-
2,59
0,00
2,59
5,23
0,50
5,73
101,05
100,00
135,94
100
100
100
Middle
Middle
Middle
Top
Middle
Middle
Top
Top
Top
1
2
Base year: 2014.
Reference: DPCS 2013/14 as of May 2014.
3
Contributions two years later than requested: adjusted at 80%.
4
Limited adjustments to address capability shortfalls of the contributed forces; would require more information from nations to get a more precise assessment.
5
Transformation and modernisation of forces addressed in metric measuring implementation of capability targets.
6
Does not assess readiness discrepancies unless significant (Ex: contribution requested at readiness 4 and provided at readiness 9).
7
Measures degree of implementation of force goals (which seek to address qualitative shortfalls of forces and defence transformation and modernisation) within the
required timeframes.
8
Can only be considered as a very rough measurement of the transformation and modernisation effort.
9
Measurement imprecise especially for capability targets with multiple requirements and capability targets with a very long implementation time.