FOU, Alm.del - 2012-13 - Bilag 102: Opdateret oversigt over dansk forsvars nøgletal i relation til NATO’s opgørelse over Input/Output metrics, fra forsvarsministeren

Input / Output Metrics – Individual Nation’s Fact SheetYear: 2011Denmark1. Percentage of Gross Domestic Product(GDP) on Defence2. Percentage of Defence Expenditure onMajor Equipment and Associated Researchand Development3A. Percentage of Implementation ofQuantitative National Targets (Year:2016)1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 63B. Percentage of Implementation ofQualitative National Targets (Year: 2016)7,8, 9, 10

--Deployable Land Forces Personnel(unit):Deployable Airframes (unit):Deployable Vessels (unit):Sustainable Land Forces Personnel(unit):Sustainable Airframes (unit):Sustainable Vessels (unit):Land Forces Personnel DeployedAbroad on NATO Operations (unit):Land Forces Personnel DeployedAbroad on non-NATO Operations(unit):Land Forces Personnel DeployedAbroad on NATO and non-NATOOperations (unit):Airframes Deployed Abroad onNATO Operations (unit):Airframes Deployed Abroad on non-NATO Operations (unit):Airframes Deployed Abroad onNATO and non-NATO Operations(unit):Vessels Deployed Abroad on NATOOperations (unit):Vessels Deployed Abroad on non-NATO Operations (unit):Vessels Deployed Abroad on NATOand non-NATO Operations (unit):5,5464581,339711,387

4A. Deployable Land Forces Personnel as aPercentage of Land Forces Personnel4B. Deployable Airframes as a Percentageof Airframes4C. Deployable Vessels as a Percentage ofVessels5A. Sustainable Land Forces Personnel asa Percentage of Land Forces Personnel5B. Sustainable Airframes as a Percentageof Airframes5C. Sustainable Vessels as a Percentage ofVessels6A. Land Forces Personnel DeployedAbroad on NATO Operations as aPercentage of Deployable Land ForcesPersonnel6B. Land Forces Personnel DeployedAbroad on non-NATO Operations as aPercentage of Deployable Land ForcesPersonnel6C. Land Forces Personnel DeployedAbroad on NATO and non-NATOOperations as a Percentage of DeployableLand Forces Personnel7A. Airframes Deployed Abroad on NATOOperations as a Percentage of DeployableAirframes7B. Airframes Deployed Abroad on non-NATO Operations as a Percentage ofDeployable Airframes7C. Airframes Deployed Abroad on NATOand non-NATO Operations as a Percentageof Deployable Airframes8A. Vessels Deployed Abroad on NATOOperations as a Percentage of DeployableVessels8B. Vessels Deployed Abroad on non-NATO Operations as a Percentage ofDeployable Vessels8C. Vessels Deployed Abroad on NATOand non-NATO Operations as a Percentageof Deployable Vessels9. Percentage of Immediate ResponseForce (IRF) Fulfilment

Base year: 2016.Reference: DPCS 2011 as of June 2011.3Contributions two years later than requested: adjusted at 80%.4Weighting system was used to address the relative magnitude of each force contribution.5Only very limited assessment of quality of forces included.6Does not assess readiness discrepancies unless significant.7Measures degree of implementation of force goals (which seek to address qualitative shortfalls of forces) within the required timeframes.8Can only be considered as a very rough measurement of the progress in transforming forces.9Measurement is imprecise, especially for force goals with multiple requirements or for force goals with a very long implementation time.10Weighting factor for each force goal takes into consideration effort and resources over the period of time required to implement it. However,it does not take into consideration that the level of effort to implement a force goal is different from nation to nation.