Udvalget for Videnskab og Teknologi 2009-10
UVT Alm.del Bilag 61
Offentligt
771412_0001.png
771412_0002.png
771412_0003.png
771412_0004.png
771412_0005.png
771412_0006.png
771412_0007.png
771412_0008.png
771412_0009.png
771412_0010.png
771412_0011.png
771412_0012.png
771412_0013.png
771412_0014.png
771412_0015.png
771412_0016.png
771412_0017.png
771412_0018.png
771412_0019.png
771412_0020.png
771412_0021.png
771412_0022.png
771412_0023.png
771412_0024.png
771412_0025.png
771412_0026.png
771412_0027.png
771412_0028.png
771412_0029.png
771412_0030.png
771412_0031.png
771412_0032.png
771412_0033.png
771412_0034.png
771412_0035.png
771412_0036.png
771412_0037.png
771412_0038.png
771412_0039.png
771412_0040.png
771412_0041.png
771412_0042.png
771412_0043.png
771412_0044.png
771412_0045.png
771412_0046.png
771412_0047.png
771412_0048.png
771412_0049.png
771412_0050.png
771412_0051.png
771412_0052.png
771412_0053.png
771412_0054.png
771412_0055.png
771412_0056.png
771412_0057.png
771412_0058.png
771412_0059.png
771412_0060.png
771412_0061.png
771412_0062.png
771412_0063.png
771412_0064.png
771412_0065.png
771412_0066.png
771412_0067.png
771412_0068.png
771412_0069.png
771412_0070.png
771412_0071.png
771412_0072.png
771412_0073.png
771412_0074.png
771412_0075.png
771412_0076.png
771412_0077.png
771412_0078.png
771412_0079.png
771412_0080.png
771412_0081.png
771412_0082.png
771412_0083.png
771412_0084.png
771412_0085.png
771412_0086.png
771412_0087.png
771412_0088.png
771412_0089.png
771412_0090.png
771412_0091.png
771412_0092.png
771412_0093.png
771412_0094.png
771412_0095.png
771412_0096.png
771412_0097.png
771412_0098.png
771412_0099.png
771412_0100.png
771412_0101.png
771412_0102.png
771412_0103.png
771412_0104.png
771412_0105.png
771412_0106.png
771412_0107.png
771412_0108.png
The UniversiTy evalUaTion 2009evaluationreport
The UniversiTy evalUaTion 2009evaluationreport
conTenTs
1. sammenfaTning................................................................................................................................5..1.1.Introduktion....................................................................................................................................51.2.Overordnede.konklusioner.. .............................................................................................................5.
1. sUmmary.............................................................................................................................................9..1.1.Introduction....................................................................................................................................91.2.Overall.conclusions.. .......................................................................................................................9.
2. The evalUaTion – backgroUnd, pUrpose and procedUre.......................................................13...2.1.The.Terms.of.Reference..................................................................................................................132.2.Procedure.for.the.evaluation. .........................................................................................................14.2.3.The.Evaluation.Panel.....................................................................................................................15
3. The wider conTexT..............................................................................................................................17.....3.1.Global.governance.reforms.............................................................................................................17.3.2.The.European.context....................................................................................................................183.3.The.Nordic.dimension. ................................................................................................................. .20.3.4.Globalisation.strategy.in.Denmark................................................................................................. .213.5.Panel’s.evaluation.perspectives.......................................................................................................22
4. UniversiTy governance. ....................................................................................................................27............4.1.University.autonomy. ....................................................................................................................27.. 4.1.1.University.autonomy:.a.central.objective. ...............................................................................27.. 4.1.2.Continuing.constraints. .........................................................................................................28.. 4.1.3.Universities’.progress.regarding.autonomy..............................................................................32. 4.1.4.Recommendations.on.autonomy. ...........................................................................................34.4.2..Codetermination.and.academic.freedom.........................................................................................36. 4.2.1.Codetermination...................................................................................................................36. . 4.2.1.1.Changes.brought.by.the.2003.University.Act...................................................................36. . 4.2.1.2.Experience.and.problems..............................................................................................37. 4.2.2.Freedom.of.research..............................................................................................................39. 4.2.3.Freedom.of.debate. .............................................................................................................. .41.. 4.2.4.Recommendations.on.codetermination.and.academic.freedom.................................................42.
5. The mergers.........................................................................................................................................45................5.1.Introduction..................................................................................................................................455.2.Research.......................................................................................................................................46. 5.2.1.International.impact.of.Danish.university.research..................................................................46. 5.2.2.Attracting.EU.funding............................................................................................................495.3.Education. ....................................................................................................................................53.. 5.3.1.Study.programmes................................................................................................................53. 5.3.2.Student.intake,.progress.and.completion.................................................................................56. 5.3.3.Conditions.of.study...............................................................................................................575.4.Innovation.and.relationship.to.the.business.sector...........................................................................58. 5.4.1.Relationship.to.private.sector.companies................................................................................58.. 5.4.2.Integrating.the.GRIs.with.universities.....................................................................................605.5.Non-merged.universities.and.government.research.institutions.........................................................62. 5.5.1.Three.non-merged.universities...............................................................................................62. 5.5.2.The.non-merged.GRIs............................................................................................................645.6.Food.Forum...................................................................................................................................665.7.Recommendations.on.mergers........................................................................................................68
4. annexes.................................................................................................................................................72 1. Terms of reference for the evaluation ............................................................................................... 722. Proposal for minimum contents of the 2009 evaluation of 18 November 2008 ...................................... 743. Brief presentation of the Evaluation Panel Members .......................................................................... 774. Reference list of background documents for the evaluation................................................................. 795. List of abbreviations used in the evaluation report ............................................................................ 836. Meeting schedule for the evaluation, including programme for the Evaluation Panel’s site visits in August 2009 ........................................................................................................ 847. The Danish university sector – a factual overview ............................................................................. 93
1
sammenfaTning
1.1 introduktionDenne.rapport.præsenterer.resultatet.af.2009-evalueringen.på.universitetsområdet,.der.blev.gennemført.fra.december.2008.til.november.2009.af.et.uafhængigt.internationalt.eva-lueringspanel..Evalueringen.blev.igangsat.på.baggrund.af.Folketingets.beslutning.V9.af.16..november.2006.og.gennemført.i.overensstemmelse.med.Kommissorium.for.evaluering.på.universitetsområdet.af.2..december.2008...Efter.introduktionen.følger.evalueringspanelets.overordnede.konklusioner.i.kapitel.1..Kapi-tel.2.præsenterer.baggrunden,.formålet.og.proceduren.for.evalueringen..I.kapitel.3.beskriver.panelet.den.globale,.europæiske,.nordiske.og.danske.sammenhæng,.som.den.danske.universitetssektor.indgår.i..Kontekstbeskrivelsen.leder.til.en.kort.gennem-gang.af.de.forhold,.som.sammen.med.de.formelle.rammer.har.dannet.en.referenceramme.for.panelets.evaluering.Kapitel.4.og.5.præsenterer.panelets.vurderinger.og.anbefalinger,.struktureret.i.overens-stemmelse.med.den.referenceramme,.der.er.beskrevet.i.kapitel.3..Der.er.vedhæftet.en.række.bilag.til.rapporten.inklusive.en.kort.faktuel.beskrivelse.af.den.danske.universitetssektor.i.de.senere.år..
1.2 overordnede konklusionerDen.danske.universitetssektor.har.gennemgået.væsentlige.ændringer.og.reformer.i.løbet.af.de.senere.år.i.tråd.med.internationale.reformtendenser.på.området..Panelet.har.brugt.intentio-nerne.bag.de.største.reformer,.universitetsloven.af.2003.og.sammenlægningsprocessen.i.2007,.som.referenceramme.for.dets.vurderinger.og.anbefalinger..Begge.reformer.har.til.hensigt.at.styrke.universitetssektorens.globale.konkurrenceevne..Et.yderligere.referencepunkt.er.den.dan-ske.Globaliseringsstrategi,.der.på.linje.med.de.globale.tendenser.er.rettet.mod.at.styrke.viden-strukturen.i.samfundet..Globaliseringsstrategien.fokuserer.blandt.andet.på.at.øge.andelen.af.unge,.der.gennemfører.en.videregående.uddannelse,.etablere.flere.ph.d.-stipendier,.fremme.in-ternationaliseringen.af.de.videregående.uddannelser.samt.forbedre.relationen.mellem.universi-teterne.og.den.private.sektor.for.så.vidt.angår.innovation..For.at.opnå.de.ønskede.resultater.af.de.forskellige.reformer.har.Folketinget.forøget.de.offentlige.midler.til.forskning.væsentligt...5
1. sammenfaTning
Universiteterne.har.opnået.større.autonomi,.og.deres.beslutningskapacitet.er.blevet.for-bedret..Imidlertid.er.denne.udvikling.blevet.ledsaget.af.omfattende.og.i.mange.tilfælde.meget.detaljeret.regulering..En.egentlig.forøgelse.af.universiteternes.overordnede.an-svarsområder.er.derfor.mindre.tydelig.sammenlignet.med.centraladministrationens.an-svarsområder..Det.er.legitimt,.at.universiteterne.skal.stå.til.ansvar.for.anvendelsen.af.de.omfattende.offentlige.midler,.som.bliver.investeret.i.dem..Men.nogle.af.de.nuværende.regler.hæmmer.autonomien,.medfører.unødvendig.administration.og.besværliggør.univer-siteternes.strategiske.udvikling..Det.nuværende.sammenflettede.ansvar.gør.de.forventede.effekter.af.styrket.universitetsautonomi.mindre.tydelige,.især.på.specifikke.områder.inden.for.uddannelse.og.ledelsesstruktur..Samtidig.har.universiteterne.ikke.fuldt.ud.implemen-teret.deres.opgaver.og.forpligtelser.som.ansvarlige,.autonome.institutioner..For.at.imødegå.disse.modsætninger.anbefaler.panelet.en.”højtillids-strategi”:.politikerne.og.de.udførende.myndigheder.bør.fastsætte.de.overordnede.strategiske.målsætninger.og.lade.universite-terne.selv.fastlægge,.hvordan.disse.målsætninger.opnås..En.sådan.fordeling.af.ansvar.er.i.overensstemmelse.med.intentionerne.bag.universitetsloven.af.2003..Medbestemmelse.for.medarbejdere.og.studerende.er.behandlet.i.universitetslovens.bestem-melser.om.de.interne.ledelsesstrukturer,.herunder.universitetsbestyrelse,.akademisk.råd,.studienævn.og.ph.d.-udvalg..Desuden.fastlægger.bemærkningerne.til.universitetsloven,.at.dekaner.og.institutledere.er.forpligtet.til.at.sikre.inddragelse.af.medarbejdere.og.stude-rende..Men.hverken.loven.eller.bemærkningerne.indeholder.en.generel.bestemmelse.til.sikring.af.medbestemmelse,.og.universiteterne.har.ikke.indført.medbestemmelse.i.tilstræk-kelig.grad..For.at.yde.retfærdighed.til.de.danske.demokratiske.traditioner.og.universitets-lovens.ånd.for.så.vidt.angår.involvering.af.medarbejdere.og.studerende.i.relevante.beslut-ningsprocesser,.og.samtidig.gøre.dette.til.et.almengyldigt.ansvar.for.universiteterne,.an-befaler.panelet,.at.der.i.universitetsloven.eller.bemærkningerne.til.loven.indsættes.en.ge-nerel.bestemmelse,.som.præciserer.den.individuelle.universitetsbestyrelses.forpligtelse.til.at.sikre.en.tilfredsstillende.praksis.for.medbestemmelse..En.sådan.bestemmelse.bør.også.sikre,.at.universitetsbestyrelserne.indfører.procedurer.for.høj.grad.af.gennemsigtighed.ved.udpegning.af.universitetsledere.og.eksterne.medlemmer.af.universitetsbestyrelserne...I.Danmark.lægges.der.stor.vægt.på.såvel.forskningsfrihed.som.den.frie akademiske debat..En.del.af.universitetsloven,.nemlig.paragraf.17.stk..2,.sender.imidlertid.et.mindre.hensigts-mæssigt.signal,.idet.den.kan.opfattes.som.en.indgriben.i.universitetsforskeres.traditionelle.værdier.og.rettigheder..Panelet.anbefaler.Folketinget.at.fjerne.eller.omformulere.paragraf.17.stk..2..For.eksempel.kunne.stykket.ændres.til.at.fastsætte,.at.forskningsfriheden.skal.være.garanteret.inden.for.de.rammer.for.videnskabelig.kvalitet,.såvel.som.de.institutio-nelle.og.finansielle.rammer,.som.den.enkelte.forsker.arbejder.inden.for..Sammenlægningerne.mellem.universiteter.og.mellem.universiteter.og.sektorforskningsin-stitutioner.er.blevet.gennemført.for.at.styrke.universitets-.og.forskningssektoren,.specielt.set.i.et.internationalt.perspektiv..Sammenlægningsprocesserne.har.virket.som.igangsættere.af.forandring.på.flere.måder..Der.er.opnået.visse.positive.effekter,.men.den.fulde.virkning.er.endnu.ikke.opnået,.især.på.grund.af.den.korte.periode.siden.sammenlægningerne..Ikke.desto.mindre.forventer.panelet,.at.universiteterne.med.tiden.vil.opfylde.det.potentiale,.som.sammenlægningerne.har.medført..Panelet.anbefaler,.at.det.diskuteres,.om.det.nye.’landkort.for.universiteter.og.forskning’.tjener.det.danske.samfunds.interesser.i.tilstræk-kelig.grad,.og.at.yderligere.justeringer.af.’landskabet’.overvejes..Spørgsmålet.om.univer-siteternes.profiler.var.ikke.et.nøglespørgsmål.på.sammenlægningstidspunktet,.men.nu.er.tiden.moden.til.at.drøfte.profilering..Panelet.anbefaler.en.debat.rettet.mod.at.fastlægge,.hvilken.diversitet.der.ønskes.i.den.danske.universitetssektor..Drøftelserne.kan.specificere.6
1. sammenfaTning
målene.vedrørende.forskningsresultater.og.deres.effekt,.for.sektoren.som.helhed.såvel.som.for.hvert.enkelt.universitet.Med.hensyn.til.Det Nationale Fødevareforum.konkluderer.panelet,.at.Fødevareforummet.i.dets.nuværende.form.ikke.fungerer.tilstrækkelig.effektivt..Hvis.Danmark.ønsker.en.leden-de.rolle.inden.for.landbrug.og.fødevareindustri,.kunne.der.formuleres.en.national.’fødeva-restrategi’,.som.kan.påvirke.og.stimulere.de.involverede.universiteter.såvel.som.samspillet.mellem.landbruget,.fødevareindustrien.og.universiteterne.
7
1
sUmmary
1.1 introductionThis.report.presents.the.outcome.of.the.Danish.University.Evaluation,.carried.out.Decem-ber.2008.–.November.2009.by.an.independent.international.evaluation.panel..The.evalu-ation.was.initiated.on.the.basis.of.the.Danish.Parliament.resolution.V9.of.16.November.2006.and.carried.through.in.accordance.with.the.Terms of Reference for the 2009 Danish University evaluation.of.3.December.2008.After.the.introduction,.a.summary.of.the.Evaluation.Panel’s.overall.conclusions.is.provid-ed..Chapter.2.presents.the.background,.purpose.and.procedure.of.the.evaluation..In.chapter.3.the.Panel.describes.the.Global,.European,.Nordic,.and.Danish.context.of.which.the.Danish.university.sector.is.part..The.context.presentation.leads.to.a.brief.de-scription.of.the.perspectives.and.framework,.according.to.which.we.have.structured.our.evaluation.while.at.the.same.time.taking.basis.in.the.formal.framework.for.the.evalua-tion.Chapters.4.and.5.present.the.Panel’s.assessments.and.recommendations..These.are.struc-tured.in.correspondence.with.the.framework.described.in.chapter.3.Several.annexes.are.attached.to.the.report,.including.a.brief.presentation.of.facts.and.later.years’.history.of.the.Danish.university.sector.
1.2 overall conclusionsIn.line.with.international.reform.trends.in.higher.education,.the.Danish.university.sec-tor.has.undergone.substantial.changes.and.reforms.during.the.last.years..The.Panel.has.taken.the.intentions.behind.the.main.reforms,.i.e..the.2003.University.Act.and.the.2007.merger.processes,.as.a.frame.of.reference.for.its.assessments.and.recommendations..Both.are.aimed.at.further.strengthening.the.university.sector’s.global.competitiveness..Another.reference.point.is.the.Danish.Globalisation.Strategy,.which.follows.the.global.trends.and.the.increasing.demands.in.supporting.the.knowledge.structure.in.society..The.Globalisation.Strategy,.among.other.things,.focuses.on.increased.access.to.higher.education,.creating.more.PhD.positions,.stimulating.a.further.intensification.of.the.in-9
1. sUmmary
ternationalisation.of.higher.education.as.well.as.a.more.effective.innovation.relationship.between.universities.and.the.private.sector..For.achieving.the.intended.outcomes.of.the.different.reforms,.the.Danish.Parliament.has.substantially.increased.the.public.funding.of.research...More.autonomy of.the.universities.has.been.achieved.and.the.decision-making.capacity.of.universities.has.been.improved..However,.this.development.has.been.accompanied.by.a.dense.set.of.rules.and.regulations,.many.of.them.too.detailed..An.actual.increase.in.the.overall.responsibilities.of.the.university.level.has.therefore.been.less.evident,.compared.to.the.responsibilities.of.the.central.administration..Accountability.is.legitimate.–.the.universities.must.account.for.the.substantial.public.funding.invested.in.them..Some.of.the.present.rules.and.regulations,.however,.are.hampering.autonomy,.entailing.unnecessary.administration.and.interfering.with.strategic.university.processes..The.present.intertwined.responsibility,.especially.with.respect.to.certain.education.issues.and.specific.features.of.the.leadership.structure,.makes.the.expected.effects.of.the.strengthened.university.autonomy.less.obvious..At.the.same.time.the.universities.have.not.fully.materialised.their.tasks.and.responsibilities.as.accountable.autonomous.institutions..To.address.the.underlying.contradictions.the.Panel.recommends.a.high-trust.strategy:.the.politicians.and.the.implementing.authorities.should.be.expected.to.stick.to.overall.strategic.targets.and.leave.to.the.universities.to.decide.how.to.reach.the.targets..Such.a.division.of.responsibilities.is.in.line.with.the.intentions.behind.the.2003.University.Act.The.codetermination.for.staff.and.students.is.covered.by.the.University.Act’s.stipulations.with.respect.to.the.internal.governance.structures,.above.all.the.university.boards,.the.academic.councils,.the.study.boards.and.the.PhD-committees..In.addition.the.explanatory.notes.to.the.Draft.Bill.on.Universities.stipulate.obligations.of.Deans.and.Heads.of.Department.to.ensure.involvement.of.staff.and.students..However,.neither.the.Act.nor.the.explanatory.notes.contain.a.general.statement.in.support.of.codetermination,.and.the.universities.have.not.implemented.codetermination.to.a.satisfactory.extent..In.order.to.do.justice.to.Danish.democratic.traditions.and.the.spirit.of.the.Act.as.regards.academic.staff.and.students’.involvement.in.relevant.decision-making.processes.and.at.the.same.time.making.this.a.general.responsibility.for.the.universities,.the.Panel.recommends.that.a.general.statement.stipulating.the.individual.university.board’s.obligation.to.secure.adequate.codetermination.practices.should.be.included.in.the.Act.or.in.the.explanatory.notes..Such.an.amendment.should.also.ensure.the.university.boards.to.be.active.in.the.implementation.of.procedures.for.a.high.degree.of.transparency.in.nominating.senior.executives.as.well.as.the.external.members.of.central.university.boards.Regarding.the.freedom of research.as.well.as.the.freedom of debate,.the.intentions.and.expectations.in.Denmark.are.high..One.part.of.the.University.Act,.though,.sends.a.less.expedient.signal,.namely.the.article.17.2,.which.could.be.regarded.as.an.intrusion.into.traditional.values.and.rights.of.academic.university.staff..The.Panel.recommends.the.Parliament.to.remove.or.reformulate.article.17.2..An.example.of.change.of.the.Act.could.be.to.let.the.article.stipulate.that.research.freedom.should.be.guaranteed.within.the.specific.financial.and.quality.framework.of.the.institution.of.the.researcher..The mergers.between.universities.and.between.universities.and.government.research.institutions.(GRIs).have.been.carried.through.in.order.to.strengthen.the.university.and.research.sector,.especially.in.an.international.setting..The.merger.processes.have.in.certain.ways.acted.as.change.drivers..The.effects.of.the.mergers.have.not.yet.been.fully.materialised,.even.though.there.are.certain.positive.effects,.and.the.short.time.since.10
1. sUmmary
the.merger.decisions.have.not.allowed.for.a.more.comprehensive.implementation..Nonetheless,.the.Panel.expects.the.universities.to.fulfil.in.due.time.the.potential.of.the.mergers..In.order.to.be.more.competitive,.the.Panel.recommends.the.adequacy.of.this.new.‘map.of.universities.and.research’.to.be.discussed.for.serving.the.interests.of.the.Danish.society.and.economy,.and.the.‘landscape’.to.be.adjusted.with.further.mergers.and.other.adjustments..As.the.question.of.university.profiles.did.not.exist.as.a.key.issue.for.the.mergers.at.the.time.of.the.merger.process,.it.might.now.be.time.for.discussing.the.profiling.of.the.universities..The.Panel.therefore.recommends.a.debate.on.university.system.diversity,.aimed.at.determining.what.kind.of.diversity.basis.the.system.should.have..The.discussion.may.include.possible.targets.for.the.university.system.as.well.as.for.each.individual.university.when.it.comes.to.research.output.and.impact.Concerning.the.Danish Food Forum,.the.Panel.concludes.that.the.Food.Forum.in.its.current.set.up.is.not.functioning.effectively..Assuming.that.Denmark.wants.a.leading.role.in.agricultural.and.food.industry,.a.framework.for.a.national.‘Food.Strategy’.might.be.set.up,.to.influence.and.stimulate.the.universities.concerned.as.well.as.the.interaction.between.the.food/agricultural.industry.and.the.universities..
11
12
2
The evalUaTion– background, purpose and procedure
This.chapter.presents.the.background.for.and.purpose.of.the.2009.University.Evaluation,.including.a.brief.presentation.of.the.evaluation.procedure.and.the.Evaluation.Panel..This.initial.presentation.of.the.“setup”.for.the.evaluation.is.followed.in.chapter.3.by.the.per-spectives.and.framework.based.on.which.the.Panel.has.structured.its.assessments,.includ-ing.the.Panel’s.description.of.the.wider.context.the.Danish.university.sector.is.part.of..The.2009.University.Evaluation.has.been.initiated.on.the.basis.of.the.Danish.Parliament.resolution.V9.of.16.November.2006,.and.carried.through.in.accordance.with.the.Terms of Reference for the 2009 Danish University evaluation of 3 December 2008..
2.1 The Terms of referenceAs.indicated.in.the.Terms.of.Reference.(annex.1),.The.Danish.Parliament’s.resolution.V9.(Denmark’s.Liberal.Party,.The.Conservative.People’s.Party,.and.The.Danish.Social.Demo-crats).of.16.November.2006.sets.out.the.formal.framework.for.the.evaluation:“The.Danish.Parliament.accepts.the.answer.from.the.Minister.of.Science,.in.that.it:>. Notes.that.the.purpose.of.the.mergers.are.more.education,.greater.international.impact.of.research,.more.innovation.and.collaboration.with.industry,.the.attraction.of.more.research.funding.from.the.EU,.as.well.as.a.continued.competent.service.in.the.area.of.government.commissioned.research.>. Notes.that.the.institutions’.self-determination.has.been.the.core.principle.in.the.merg-ers.of.the.universities.and.the.government.research.institutions,.which.are.to.come.into.effect.on.January.1,.2007.>. Underlines.the.importance.of.the.university.law’s.provisions.concerning.research.free-dom.and.employees’.freedom.to.participate.in.the.public.debate.>. Notes.that.the.Minister.of.Science.in.2009.will.conduct.an.evaluation.of.the.extent.to.which.the.purpose.of.the.university.mergers.has.been.achieved.>. Notes.that.the.Minister.of.Science.in.2009.furthermore.will.conduct.an.evaluation.of.the.state.of.codetermination.for.employees.and.students.at.the.universities,.the.free.academic.debate,.and.research.freedom,.under.the.current.university.law.”The.purpose.of.the.evaluation.has.been.to.investigate.the.issues.described.in.the.Danish.13
2. The evalUaTion – backgroUnd, pUrpose and procedUre
Parliament’s.resolution.V9,.as.well.as.issues.concerning.the.development.of.degrees.of.freedom.(autonomy).for.the.universities,.with.the.main.focus.on.the.effect.of.the.reform.of.2003.(the.2003.University.Act).and.the.2007.reform.(the.mergers.of.universities.and.government.research.institutions)..According.to.the.Terms.of.Reference,.“The.aim.of.the.two.reforms.was.to.provide.universities.with.an.enhanced.capacity.for.strategic.prioritisa-tion.across.their.core.areas.of.activity:.education,.research,.and.knowledge.transfer,.as.well.as.with.an.enhanced.ability.to.meet.demands.of.society.”In.connection.with.the.purpose.of.the.evaluation,.the.Terms.of.Reference.specified.that:.“The.creation,.through.the.reform.of.2003,.of.a.clear.and.transparent.management.struc-ture.including.appointed.leaders.and.governing.boards.with.a.majority.of.members.from.outside.the.university,.forms.the.basis.for.the.evaluation.”With.reference.to.the.explanatory.notes.for.“The.Draft.Bill.to.Changing.the.University.Act.(L140).of.31.January.2007”,.the.Terms.of.Reference.stipulated.that.the.evaluation.should.be.conducted.independently.
2.2 procedure for the evaluationThe.document.“Proposal.for.minimum.contents.of.the.2009.evaluation.of.18.November.2008”,.including.amendments.of.29.January.2009.(annex.2).also.belongs.to.the.formal.framework.for.the.evaluation..It.comprises.the.following.evaluation.areas:A.. Fulfilment.of.the.purpose.of.university.mergers1.. More.education2.. Greater.international.impact.of.research3.. More.innovation.and.collaboration.with.industry4.. Attraction.of.more.EU-funding5.. Continued.competence.in.commissioned.services.to.governmentB.. Codetermination.for.employees.and.studentsC.. The.free.academic.debateD.. Research.freedomE.. Degrees.of.freedom.(Autonomy)The.Panel.notes.that.the.data.available.this.early.after.the.completion.of.the.mergers.will.not.be.sufficient.to.establish.valid.causal.links..Regarding.the.mergers.the.Panel.therefore.has.had.to.rely.to.a.large.extent.on.experiences,.perceptions,.and.interpretations.The.main.objects.for.the.evaluation.were.the.eight.Danish.universities,.i.e..the.five.uni-versities.that.have.undergone.mergers.in.2007.(University.of.Copenhagen.(KU),.Aarhus.University.(AU),.Technical.University.of.Denmark.(DTU),.University.of.Southern.Denmark.(SDU).and.Aalborg.University.(AAU)),.and.the.three.universities.that.did.not.merge.(Co-penhagen.Business.School.(CBS),.Roskilde.University.(RUC),.and.IT-University.of.Copen-hagen.(ITU))..In.addition,.the.following.four.government.research.institutions,.which.were.not.merged,.have.been.included.in.the.evaluation:.SFI.-.Danish.National.Research.Centre.for.Social.Research;.NFA.-.National.Research.Centre.for.the.Working.Environment;.GEUS.-.Geological.Survey.of.Denmark.and.Greenland;.and:.The.Kennedy.Centre..Finally,.DFF.–.Danish.Food.Forum.(“Det.Nationale.Fødevareforum”).has.been.included.in.the.evaluation..The.inclusion.of.the.latter.in.the.evaluation.was.decided.in.connection.with.the.foundation.of.DFF,.which.took.place.as.a.consequence.of.the.mergers..14
2. The evalUaTion – backgroUnd, pUrpose and procedUre
The.evaluation.has.drawn.upon.a.number.of.surveys.and.analyses.conducted.by.private.consultants,.and.statistical.data.delivered.by.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.In-novation.and.the.Danish.University.and.Property.Agency..The.evaluation.has.also.ben-efited.from.comprehensive.written.reports.and.statements.from.the.individual.universities.as.well.as.from.Universities.Denmark,.the.non-merged.government.research.institutions,.relevant.Ministries.and.several.other.stakeholders..Furthermore,.the.Panel.has.included.the.recent.evaluations.of.SFI.and.NFA.as.the.basis.for.its.investigations.in.relation.to.these.two.institutions...An.overview.of.the.background.material.is.enclosed.as.annex.4.In.addition,.the.Panel.has.based.its.evaluation.on.information.and.opinions.obtained.from.meetings.with.employees,.students,.and.management.representatives.of.the.individual.universities,.as.well.as.with.representatives.of.non-merged.government.research.institu-tions,.relevant.ministries.and.relevant.stakeholders.and.collaboration.partners.of.the.universities..The.meetings.with.the.universities.and.other.stakeholders.took.place.during.the.Panel’s.nine.days.assembly.in.Denmark.20-28.August.2009..In.addition,.ahead.of.the.August.assembly,.on.12.May.2009,.the.Panel.Chair.and.one.Panel.Member.met.with.a.number.of.stakeholders..Programmes.for.the.Panel’s.meetings.with.the.universities.and.other.stakeholders.are.enclosed.in.the.time.and.work.plan.for.the.evaluation.(annex.6).The.meetings.were.held.as.informal.discussions.on.the.basis.of.specific.questions.pre-pared.in.advance,.aimed.in.particular.at.gaining.information.and.viewpoints.supplemen-tary.to.the.received.background.documents,.focusing.especially.on.the.impact.of.the.merg-ers.and.the.university.sector.policy.instruments.(legislative,.financial.and.dialogue.based.instruments).The.Panel.has.had.several.internal.meetings.for.planning.as.well.as.for.discussing.its.ob-servations,.assessments.and.recommendations.(see.annex.6)..From.August.to.November.2009.the.Panel.completed.the.evaluation.report..The.Panel’s.communication.on.the.report.took.place.via.e-mail,.telephone.and.meetings..
2.3 The evaluation panelIn.accordance.with.the.Terms.of.Reference,.the.evaluation.has.been.conducted.by.an.ex-ternal,.internationally.composed.evaluation.panel..Annex.3.provides.a.brief.description.of.the.Panel.which.consisted.of.the.following.experts:> Dr..Agneta.Bladh,.Rector,.University.of.Kalmar.(chair)> Professor.Elaine.El-Khawas,.George.Washington.University> Dr..Abrar.Hasan,.Independent.Consultant> Professor.Peter.Maassen,.University.of.Oslo> Professor.Georg.Winckler,.Rector,.University.of.ViennaPia.Jørnø,.M.Sc.,.independent.consultant.and.science.writer,.served.as.academic.secretary.for.the.Panel..Søren.Poul.Nielsen,.M.A.,.independent.consultant,.served.as.additional.aca-demic.secretary.during.the.Panel’s.meetings.with.universities.and.stakeholders.in.August..Both.served.independently.of.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.
15
16
3
The wider conTexT
The.reform.forces.and.expectations.that.confront.universities.around.the.world.also.ap-ply.to.the.Danish.universities..Danish.universities.and.this.evaluation.must.take.account.of.these.contextual.forces.for.better.understanding.the.challenges.Danish.universities.are.facing.nationally.and.internationally..There.are,.firstly,.the.global.reform.trends..With.Denmark’s.goal.of.developing.a.world.class.university.system.that.can.support.the.global.competitiveness.of.the.country’s.economy,.it.joins.a.large.number.of.other.countries.with.similar.ambitions..Countries.around.the.world.are.introducing.reforms.aimed.at.creating.conditions.under.which.their.universities.can.compete.with.the.best.universities.in.the.world..Secondly.the.European.context.is.of.particular.significance.for.Danish.universities.from.the.perspective.of.the.development.of.the.European.Higher.Education.Area.(as.part.of.the.Bologna.Process).as.well.as.the.European.Research.Area..In.the.framework.of.this.evaluation,.especially.the.role.of.the.European.research.funding.is.examined..Thirdly.in.the.Nordic.context.the.interconnections.are.strong..In.this.context.especially.common.Nor-dic.political.and.cultural.values.and.traditions.are.of.relevance..Finally,.university.reforms.within.the.country.take.place.within.the.context.of.wider.socio-economic.and.political.forces..University.reforms.in.Denmark.have.been.shaped.by.and.must.take.account.of.such.developments.as.the.Government’s.Globalisation.strategy..These.four.elements.are.discussed.below.as.a.prelude.to.describing.the.Panel’s.evaluation.perspective,.which.is.taken.up.at.the.end.of.the.chapter.
3.1 global governance reformsIn.recent.decades.governments.around.the.world.have.introduced.major.reforms.of.their.university.systems..These.reforms.are.in.general.a.response.to.changes.in.the.socio-economic.and.political.environments.of.the.universities..The.changes.in.question.are.re-quiring.universities.to.meet.a.wider.set.of.goals.than.the.traditional.provision.of.primary.teaching.and.research.activities..These.derive.from.the.growing.policy.focus.on.the.link.between.education,.basic.research,.and.innovation;.the.continuously.growing.number.of.students.enrolling.in.the.tertiary.education.sector.and.the.need.for.a.greater.diversity.of.provision;.technological.change;.changing.competencies.and.skills.requirements.on.the.labour.market;.and.changing.demographic.and.mobility.patterns..Competition.among.na-tions.is.also.a.part.of.this,.with.the.recognition.that.the.quality.of.higher.education.and.research,.and.its.permeability.in.the.economy,.hold.the.key.to.economic.growth.and.social.inclusion..17
3. The wider conTexT
Two global trends: Strengthened autonomy and strengthened regulatory regimesFaced.with.these.changes.governments.in.all.OECD.countries.are.engaged.in.reforming.their.higher.education.system..In.this,.special.attention.is.given.to.the.governance.modes.with.respect.to.higher.education..This.concerns.both.the.system.level.governance.ap-proach.and.the.intra-institutional.governance.structures..There.are.two.clear.and.opposite.directions.of.change..One,.in.continental.European.countries,.and.the.Asian.OECD.coun-tries,.where.levels.of.university.autonomy.were.traditionally.low,.there.is.a.move.to.ex-pand.the.degree.of.institutional.autonomy..The.second.orientation,.visible.in.those.coun-tries.in.which.universities.enjoyed.traditionally.high.degrees.of.autonomy,.is.to.strengthen.the.regulatory.regime.to.bring.the.more.autonomous.university.sectors.more.in.line.with.the.requirements.of.the.public.interest..These.opposite,.but.complementary,.trends.represent.the.need.for.national.governments.to.find.an.appropriate.balance.between.system.level.order.and.the.need.for.governmen-tal.control.versus.an.effective.level.of.system.diversity.and.autonomy.of.the.public.sec-tor.institutions.including.universities.(Olsen.2007)..The.two.trends.represent.attempts.to.improve.the.governance.balance.between.government.and.higher.education:.either.through.strengthening.university.autonomy.or.to.reduce.university.autonomy.in.certain.areas.from.a.public.interest.perspective..This.also.implies.that.university.autonomy.is.not.an.aim.in.itself,.nor.can.be.absolute..It.is.part.of.a.complex.governance.relationship.that.has.to.be.reviewed.and.adapted.regularly.in.order.to.assure.its.continuous.effective-ness..Consequently,.the.key.question.governments.are.struggling.with,.when.it.comes.to.gov-erning.their.university.systems.effectively,.is.the.following:.How to provide appropriate levels of institutional autonomy and, at the same time, comple-ment institutional autonomy with an accountability regime that satisfies the public interest without becoming a constraint on universities’ responsiveness and innovation?
3.2 The european contextSince.the.second.half.of.the.1990s.there.has.been.a.growing.political.focus.in.Europe.on.the.possible.consequences.of.globalisation..This.development.was.ignited.by.the.per-ceived.weaknesses.of.the.European.economies.in.comparison.to.the.US.economy.and.the.rapid.rise.of.China.and.India.as.important.economic.powers..The.heads.of.state.of.the.EU.members.have.expressed.their.worries.and.presented.their.strategies.for.addressing.the.challenges.for.Europe.in.the.so-called.Lisbon.2000.Agenda,.which.aims.at.strengthening.the.economic.competitiveness.of.Europe.as.well.as.improving.the.social.cohesion.of.its.societies..As.a.consequence,.there.is.at.the.beginning.of.the.21st.century.a.clear.political.“momen-tum”.for.the.university.in.Europe..The.Lisbon.Summit.of.2000.has.(re-)confirmed.the.role.of.the.university.as.a.central.institution.in.the.“Europe.of.Knowledge”..Consequent-ly,.we.can.observe.that.since.2000.the.Commission.has.become.highly.interested.in.the.university.as.an.object.of.European.level.policy-making..This.is.clearly.inspired.by.the.interpretation.of.the.university’s.central.role.in.connecting.education,.research,.and.in-novation.(the.Knowledge.Triangle),.and.the.assumption.that.the.effectiveness.of.this.connection.is.considered.to.be.of.major.importance.for.the.competitiveness.of.Europe’s.economies.and.the.level.of.social.cohesion.of.its.societies..In.the.Commission’s.commu-18
3. The wider conTexT
nications.and.other.policy.papers.the.university.has.either.directly.or.indirectly.become.a.central.concern..The.general.worry.about.“global.competitiveness”.is.primarily.focused.upon.the.European.research-intensive.university..Based.on.indicators.and.statistics,.especially.international.rankings,.but.also.on.statistics.such.as.the.number.of.international.students.in.Europe,.the.number.of.European.students.in.Australia.and.the.US,.and.the.number.of.European.aca-demics.at.US.universities,.the.view.dominates.that.the.European.University.is.lagging.be-hind..Reform.is.promoted.as.the.means.through.which.European.universities.can.compete.(again).with.their.US.counterparts.The.European.level.reform.proposals.use.two.organisational.models.as.their.main.frame.of.reference,.namely.the.leading.US.research.universities.and.the.successful.enterprise.and.its.assumed.style.of.organisation.and.governance..The.first.defines.the.crisis.of.the.Euro-pean.university.and.is.organised.around.the.question:.“Why.is.there.no.Euro-Ivy.League?”.(Science.2004:.951).The.second.presents.the.solution:.European.universities.have.to.be-come.more.like.private.enterprises.operating.in.competitive.environments.The.university.reform.agendas.that.are.presented.at.the.European.level.focus.especially.on.the.relationship.between.research.and.innovation..The.legitimacy.of.the.European.Commission.to.launch.university.reform.ideas.is.based.on.its.competence.in.the.area.of.research.policy,.which.has.been.developed.since.the.beginning.of.the.1980s..The.most.important.research.policy.instrument.for.the.Commission.has.been.the.multi-annually.framework.programmes.(FPs)..The.first.FPs.had.a.purely.economic.rationale,.but.they.gradually.expanded.in.disciplinary.scope.and.funding..The.attached.objectives.became.more.heterogeneous.covering.not.only.economic.but.also.ecological,.social,.and.political.rationales..The.Lisbon.2000.summit.led.to.important.innovations.in.the.aims,.organisation,.and.am-bitions.of.the.FPs,.as.well.as.to.the.introduction.of.the.European.Research.Area.(ERA)..Through.the.ERA.the.EU.intends.to.influence.and.integrate.the.national.research.poli-cies.of.its.member.states..The.ERA.ambitions.are,.amongst.other.things,.expressed.in.the.joint.3.%.target.of.GDP.to.be.invested.in.research.and.development..In.addition,.in.the.development.of.the.latest.FP.(FP7),.the.member.states.and.the.EU.agreed.upon.the.es-tablishment.of.the.European.Research.Council.(ERC).which.is.a.considerable.institutional.innovation.at.the.European.level..It.is.significant.because.it.entails.changing.the.idea.and.principles.of.research.funding.in.Europe..To.understand.the.innovative.nature.of.the.ERC,.the.following.transformative.dimensions.are.of.relevance:>. The.ERC.brings.basic.research.into.the.heart.of.the.EU.research.policy,.i.e..as.a.sepa-rate.construction.within.the.Seventh.Framework.Programme.(FP7)..>. The.establishment.of.the.ERC.changed.the.definition.of.what.kind.of.research.is.a.le-gitimate.concern.at.the.EU.level..>. The.ERC.represents.a.break.with.the.established.principles.of.criteria.for.European.re-search.funding.with.the.“excellence.only”.principle,.no.pre-determined.research.topics.and.no.criteria.of.trans-nationality.or.even.research.collaboration,.but.highly.selective.funding.given.to.individual.researchers.and.their.teams..Currently,.the.EU.research.funding.context.for.Danish.universities.consists.first.and.fore-most.of.the.FP7,.one.of.the.largest.public.research.programmes.in.human.history.with.a.budget.of.over.€.50.billion.to.be.distributed.in.the.period.2007-2013..The.underlying.19
3. The wider conTexT
assumption.for.the.FP7.is.that.it.will.be.a.major.step.towards.creating.a.world.class.Euro-pean.research.environment.through.stimulating.competition.for.research.funding.among.Europe’s.best.and.most.ambitious.researchers;.stimulating.mobility.of.the.best.research-ers.leading.to.strategic.concentrations.of.top.researchers.in.a.limited.number.of.European.universities,.public.non-university.research.institutions,.and.the.private.sector;.and.stimu-lating.national.research.councils,.ministries.and.university.leadership.to.develop.strategic.priorities.in.line.with.the.research.agendas.of.the.European.Commission.While.(higher).education.has.traditionally.been.a.nationally.sensitive.policy.area.in.the.EU,.also.here.the.Lisbon.Summit.marks.an.important.beginning.of.more.direct.involve-ment.of.the.European.Commission.in.educational.policies..The.Erasmus.Mundus.pro-gramme.has,.for.example,.given.a.major.boost.to.the.development.of.international.joint.degree.programmes.in.Europe..Finally,.we.wish.to.mention.the.Bologna.Process..Currently.46.European.states.participate.in.this.intergovernmental.process,.documented.by.the.communiqués.of.the.bi-annual.min-isterial.conferences..The.Bologna.Process.aims.at.creating.the.European.Higher.Education.Area.(EHEA).characterised.by.a.compatibility.and.comparability.of.national.higher.educa-tion.systems.based.on.a.three.cycle.structure..As.stressed.in.the.Leuven.communiqué.of.April.2009,.the.Bologna.Process.is.“firmly.embedded.in.the.European.values.of.institu-tional.autonomy,.academic.freedom,.and.social.equity”.and.requires.“full.participation.of.students.and.staff”..Intra-European.mobility.of.students,.early.stage.researchers,.and.staff,.is.one.of.the.main.concerns.of.the.Bologna.Process..The.Leuven.communiqué.states.the.ambitious.goal.that,.by.2020,.“at.least.20.%.of.those.graduating.in.the.countries.of.the.European.Higher.Education.Area.should.have.had.a.study.or.training.period.abroad”.. Although,.officially,.the.Bologna.Process.is.a.purely.intergovernmental.process.among.nearly.all.European.states,.it.is.more.and.more.driven.by.various.stakeholders.including.the.European.Commission,.the.latter.successfully.trying.to.integrate.EU’s.education.and.lifelong.learning.policies.and.programs.with.the.Bologna.agenda.
3.3 The nordic dimensionThe.Danish.universities.are.positioned.in.a.number.of.international.arenas,.including.the.Nordic.region.consisting.of.Denmark,.Finland,.Iceland,.Norway,.Sweden.and.the.autono-mous.territories.of.Greenland,.the.Faroe.Islands,.and.Åland..Nordic.cooperation.within.higher.education.was.established.well.before.the.current.focus.on.the.economic.and.societal.impact.of.universities..While.the.traditional.rationale.for.Nordic.cooperation.within.higher.education.was.culturally.and.academically.based,.such.traditions.are.challenged.by.emerg-ing.new.rationales.for.universities’.internationalisation.and.relations.to.economy.and.market.competition..Nonetheless,.for.understanding.the.Danish.university.dynamics,.the.Panel.finds.it.of.relevance.to.reflect.briefly.on.the.main.dimensions.of.Nordic.higher.education.Similar.to.the.EU.with.its.Lisbon.Agenda,.in.2000.the.Nordic.Council.of.Ministers.also.adopted.a.Nordic.Agenda.and.a.strategy.for.Nordic.cooperation..The.Nordic.Agenda.high-lights.five.areas.of.special.importance.for.Nordic.cooperation:>. Technological.development.with.special.reference.to.the.information.society.and.Nor-dic.research.>. Social.security.and.the.possibility.for.Nordic.citizens.to.live,.work,.and.study.in.an-other.Nordic.country.20
3. The wider conTexT
>. The.internal.Nordic.market.and.cooperation.for.abolishing.border.obstacles.>. Cooperation.with.neighbouring.countries.and.neighbouring.regions.>. The.environment.and.sustainable.development.in.energy,.transport,.forestry,.fishery,.and.trade.and.industry.In.2005,.this.Agenda.was.followed.by.a.joint.strategy.of.the.Nordic.Council.and.the.Nordic.Council.of.Ministers.as.presented.in.the.report.“Norden som global vinderregion”.[The.Nordic.Region.as.a.Global.Winner.region]..The.report.argues.that.the.Nordic.region.is.under.pressure.from.globalisation.and.increased.international.competition.from.China.and.India,.and.that.this.raises.the.question.of.what.the.Nordic.region.should.base.its.economy.and.welfare.in.the.future..As.a.consequence.of.the.agreements.reached.in.the.Nordic.Council.and.Nordic.Council.of.Ministers.over.many.years,.the.Nordic.countries.have.developed.a.common.labour.market,.have.established.common.institutions.in.various.policy.areas,.and.have.devel-oped.cooperation.schemes.and.programmes..With.respect.to.education.this.has.resulted.in.various.mobility.programmes.for.pupils,.students,.teachers,.and.researchers.(includ-ing.the.Nordplus.programme.for.students.and.teachers);.agreements.for.the.mutual.recognition.of.degrees.and.study.programmes,.simplified.admission.requirements.for.Nordic.students.throughout.the.region;.and.various.expert.committees.for.policy.issues.and.cooperation.initiatives..Further,.a.number.of.cooperation.programmes.have.been.implemented.relating.to.research..The.Nordic.Science.Policy.council.was.established.in.1983,.and.cooperation.in.the.area.of.research.training.has.existed.since.1990..The.socio-economic,.political,.and.cultural.similarities.between.the.Nordic.countries.form.a.solid.foundation.for.their.long-term.cooperation,.and.form.at.the.same.time.a.good.basis.for.a.continuing.bench-marking.in.different.areas,.including.education.and.research..Although.there.are.clear.political,.economic,.and.historical.differences.between.the.countries,.policy-making.in.this.region.is.often.characterised.as.being.a.result.of.the.“Nordic.Model”..With.respect.to.higher.education,.typical.ingredients.of.this.model.are.public.higher.education.institutions.with.institutional.autonomy.in.many.areas,.a.democratic.intra-university.governance.structure.with.a.structured.involvement.of.staff.and.students,.high.levels.of.state.investments,.strong.emphasis.on.equality.con-cerning.the.institutional.landscape.and.the.way.in.which.public.resources.are.allocated.throughout.the.system..To.complement.this.picture,.the.Nordic.states.have.traditionally.also.offered.quite.favourable.student.support.schemes.with.the.aim.of.stimulating.high.participation.rates.in.the.sector..
3.4 globalisation strategy in denmarkDenmark.is.one.of.the.European.countries.that.have.developed.a.specific.national.glo-balisation.strategy.called.“Progress,.Innovation.and.Cohesion.Strategy.for.Denmark.in.the.Global.Economy”..Responsible.for.this.strategy.was.a.Globalisation.Council.set.up.in.2005.and.consisting.of.representatives.of.many.sections.of.society..The.strategy.can.be.re-garded.as.one.of.the.most.straightforward.and.explicit.national.level.initiatives.in.Europe.to.handle.the.challenges.of.the.global.economy..In.the.analysis.underlying.the.strategy.a.number.of.the.Danish.strengths.and.weaknesses.have.been.highlighted..The.strengths.indicated.are.the.strong.national.economy,.the.flexible.labour.market,.low.unemployment.and.a.highly.educated.population..The.indicated.main.weaknesses.are.the.ageing.popula-tion,.the.high.cost.and.price.level.of.the.Danish.economy,.and.the.fact.that.the.Danish.21
3. The wider conTexT
education.system.is.not.geared.towards.a.knowledge.society..The.latter.expresses.itself.in.the.following.characteristics:.Danish.students.begin.and.complete.their.studies.late.(age.wise),.higher.education.programmes.have.a.high.drop.out.rate,.and.the.number.of.gradu-ates.in.natural.and.engineering.sciences.is.too.low..The.Globalisation.Strategy.has,.as.such,.a.strong.focus.on.education.and.research.on.the.basis.of.the.starting.point.that.“Human.knowledge,.ideas.and.work.effort.are.key.for.exploiting.the.opportunities.of.the.globalisation”.(In.Danish:.“Menneskers viden, idérig-dom og arbejdsindsats er nøglen til at bruge de muligheder, som globaliseringen giver os”)..In.its.implementation,.this.focus.has.even.become.more.pronounced,.implying.that.the.globalisation.strategy.has.become,.in.the.first.place,.an.education.and.research.policy.strategy..The.most.important.university-oriented.policy.goals.introduced.in.the.framework.of.the.globalisation.strategy.are.to:> raise.the.public.investments.in.research.from.0.75%.to.1%.of.the.Danish.GDP;> link.the.basic.public.funding.of.universities.more.directly.to.the.quality.of.their.ac-tivities;> integrate.the.government.research.institutions.(GRIs).into.the.universities;> double.the.number.of.PhD.students;> introduce.a.system.of.accreditation.for.all.university.education.programmes;> increase.the.higher.education.participation.rate.from.45.to.50%;> stimulate.a.more.rapid.throughput.of.higher.education.students;> introduce.better.and.more.structured.options.for.Danish.students.for.studying.abroad..To.realise.these.policy.goals.a.number.of.specific.measures.and.reforms.have.been.intro-duced.in.the.Danish.university.sector,.including.the.university.merger.processes..These.are.not.isolated,.but.relate.to.the.Danish.political.system’s.overall.reform.efforts.with.respect.to.higher.education,.which.include.the.2003.University.Act.aiming.at.university.autonomy..All.these.efforts.are.aimed.at.further.strengthening.the.Danish.universities.and,.as.one.of.the.underlying.goals,.enabling.the.universities.to.compete.in.a.number.of.fields.with.the.world’s.best.universities..The.Danish.Globalisation.Strategy,.also.mirroring.the.trends.in.Europe,.as.well.as.other.parts.of.the.world,.is.thus.an.important.component.of.the.basis.for.this.evaluation.
3.5 panel’s evaluation perspectivesAs.indicated,.the.changes.and.expectations.that.confront.universities.around.the.world.also.apply.to.the.Danish.universities..As.expressed.in.parliamentary.resolution.V9,.the.overall.aim.of.the.two.main.university.reforms.introduced.by.the.Danish.Government.in.the.2000s.was.to.create.the.conditions.under.which.the.universities.would.be.able.to.de-velop.their.own.strategic.priorities.with.respect.to.their.education,.research,.and.innova-tion.tasks..In.addition,.the.reforms.were.intended.to.improve.the.relationships.between.the.universities.and.society..The.first.of.these.two.reforms,.i.e..the.2003.University.Act,.was.focused.on.establishing.university.autonomy.while.at.the.same.time.ensuring.accountability..The.new.Act.intro-duced.a.major.change.by.modernising.the.intra-university.governance.structure.through.22
3. The wider conTexT
moving.decision.making.responsibilities.from.collegial,.representative.councils.to.ap-pointed.leaders.(rector,.deans,.and.heads.of.department)..Further,.the.new.Act.aimed.at.improving.the.relationship.between.universities.and.society.through.the.introduction.of.central.university.boards.with.a.majority.of.external.members..This.reform.was.followed.by.the.2007.merger.operations.that.led.to.fewer.universities.and.a.concentration.of.pub-licly.funded.R&D.in.the.university.sector..The.university.merger.processes.consisted.of.an.integration.of.GRIs.into.the.university.sector,.which.was.a.target.of.the.globalisation.strategy;.and.mergers.between.universities,.which.was.initiated.by.the.Government..The.integration.of.GRIs.had.as.its.main.aims.to.stimulate.research.synergies.between.until.now.institutionally.separated.sectors;.to.fer-tilise.the.university.sector.with.practice.oriented.research.leading.to.close.contacts.with.societal,.i.e..private.and.public.sector.agencies;.and:.to.make.additional.research.resources.available.for.educational.processes,.leading.to.a.strengthening.of.the.link.between.higher.education.and.research.As.such,.the.2003.Act.can.be.seen.as.creating.the.governance.conditions.for.the.profiling.and.strategic.prioritising.of.universities,.while.the.merger.processes.added.a.substantive.dimension.through.the.concentration.of.research.capacities.in.selected.areas.in.specific.universities..The.Panel’s.evaluation.framework.is.based.on.the.nature.and.aims.of.these.two.reforms.Consequently, the Panel has organised its evaluation and assessments along two lines, i.e. first developments with respect to university governance since 2003 (focusing on two sub-lines: university autonomy, and codetermination and academic freedom); and second the effects of the mergers on the dynamics and productivity of the university system.
University governanceThe.2003.Act.is.in.line.with.global.reform.trends.aimed.at.modernising.university.manage-ment..Such.reforms.are.not.implemented.in.a.vacuum,.since.the.governance.structures.to.be.changed.have.their.own.traditions.and.characteristics.that.continue.to.have.an.influ-ence.long.after.the.legal.foundations.for.the.structures.have.been.altered..In.the.Danish.case.this.means,.for.example,.that.the.democratic.traditions.with.respect.to.university.governance,.including.the.structured.involvement.of.staff.and.students.in.intra-university.decision-making,.continue.to.have.an.influence.also.after.the.2003.reform..As.such.the.in-troduction.of.appointed.leaders.in.university.governance.structures,.and.the.establishment.of.central.executive.boards,.have.ameliorated.the.formal.decision-making.capabilities.of.the.universities,.but.the.demand.for.a.democratic.intra-university.governance.structure.has.also.continued..As.a.consequence,.for.it.to.be.successful.and.effective,.the.2003.re-form.needs.to.lead.to.an.appropriate.balance.in.the.intra-university.governance.structure.between.top-down.oriented.executive.leadership,.and.a.bottom-up.management.style,.which.should.include.an.effective.involvement.of.staff.and.students.in.academic.decision.making.at.all.appropriate.levels..In.addition,.the.framework.conditions,.within.which.the.university.leadership.can.operate.autonomously,.demand.an.“arm’s.length.distance”.from.the.side.of.the.involved.Ministries.and.the.Parliament,.which.implies.the.setting.of.overall.targets,.instead.of.an.interference.through.detailed.regulations.and.control.in.the.day-to-day.responsibilities.of.the.university.management..One.of.the.conditions.for.this.is.a.high.level.of.trust.from.the.central.au-23
3. The wider conTexT
thorities.in.the.capabilities.of.the.universities.to.use.the.autonomy.in.the.expected.way..In.other.words,.an.adequate.balance.between.autonomy.and.accountability.of.the.universi-ties.should.be.maintained..On.the.one.hand,.the.universities,.in.order.to.keep.up.a.high,.or.even.world-class.standard,.need.room.to.operate.and.develop..On.the.other.hand.the.authorities,.representing.the.tax.payers,.have.a.legitimate.right.to.demand.documentation.for.the.universities’.prudent.use.of.the.substantial.public.funding..Furthermore,.academic.freedom,.including.freedom.of.research.and.free.academic.de-bate,.is.a.fundamental.principle.of.university.life,.and.both.governments.and.universi-ties.must.ensure.respect.for.this.fundamental.requirement..To.meet.the.needs.of.the.world.around.a.university,.the.research.must.be.morally.and.intellectually.independent,.and.it.must.be.ensured.that.research.issues.can.be.freely.selected,.research.methodology.freely.developed,.and.research.results.freely.published.in.the.framework.of.the.employ-ment.conditions.provided.by.the.university.and.the.assessments.of.peers.from.the.same.academic.area..
University mergersWhile.the.2003.reform.created.the.governance.framework.for.strategic.leadership,.the.globalisation.strategy.provided.the.framework.for.making.the.next.step,.i.e..creating.the.academic.framework.conditions.for.strategic.prioritisation.and.profiling.by.stimulating.merger.processes.that.would.lead.to.a.concentration.of.research.capacities.in.universi-ties..The.mergers.were.also.expected.to.strengthen.education,.and.especially.upper.level.education.degree.programmes,.amongst.other.things,.by.bringing.research.staff.from.the.GRI.sector.into.the.universities..Mergers.were.also.intended.to.create.the.conditions.for.effective.relationships.between.universities.and.the.private.as.well.as.the.public.sector,.which.would.contribute.to.economically.relevant,.as.well.as.other.societal,.innovations..The.starting.point.for.the.merger.process.was.the.assumption.in.the.Globalisation.Strategy.of.the.benefit.in.merging.the.government.research.institutions.(GRIs).with.the.universi-ties..Subsequently,.the.Government.also.initiated.a.merger.process.between.universities..The.stated.expectations.of.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.were.the.establishment.of.a.strongly.reduced.number.of.universities.with.ameliorated.strength.in.the.international.setting..
Main evaluation issuesBased.on.these.perspectives,.the.Panel.has.in.the.first.place.studied.and.assessed.the.way.in.which.specific.governance.aspects.of.the.university.sector.have.developed.since.2003..In.this,.it.has.examined.two.specific.issues:.> How.have.the.2003.Act,.and.regulations.plus.various.other.steering.instruments.follow-ing.the.Act,.influenced.university.autonomy,.and.have.the.universities.implemented.the.Act.fully.and.adequately.in.the.given.conditions.and.framework?.> How.has.the.implementation.of.the.2003.Act.by.the.universities.affected.university.de-mocracy,.more.specifically.the.involvement.of.the.staff.and.students.in.intra-university.decision.making.processes;.and.the.freedom.of.research.and.the.free.academic.debate?The.issues.of.autonomy,.staff.and.student.involvement,.research.freedom.and.free.aca-demic.debate.are.addressed.in.Chapter.4..In.chapter.5.the.Panel.presents.its.assessment.of.the.effects.of.the.mergers,.while.recognising.the.methodological.limitations.imposed.by.the.short.period.since.the.mergers..Mindful.of.this.limitation,.the.Panel.has.attempted.to.24
3. The wider conTexT
analyse.the.effects.of.the.mergers.on.the.key.issue.of.strategic.positioning.by.universities.in.pursuit.of.the.goal.of.strengthening.the.university.sector’s.global.competitiveness..> What.kind.of.impact.of.the.mergers.can.be.seen.so.far.on.the.main.activity.areas.of.the.universities,.i.e..education,.research,.and.innovation,.on.universities’.relationship.with.the.private.sector,.and.on.government-oriented.research?
25
26
4
UniversiTy governance
In.this.chapter.the.Panel.presents.its.assessments.and.recommendations.as.regards.the..development.of.specific.governance.aspects.of.the.Danish.university.sector.since.the.in-troduction.of.the.2003.University.Act.and.subsequent.regulations..In.line.with.the.Panel’s.Terms.of.Reference,.we.address.two.main.aspects..Firstly,.we.assess.the.way.in.which.the.2003.University.Act,.and.regulations.plus.various.other.steering.instruments.following.the.Act,.have.affected.university.autonomy..In.addition,.we.discuss.the.extent.to.which.the.universities.have.implemented.the.Act.effectively.in.the.sense.of.university.autonomy..Secondly,.we.assess.the.effects.of.the.2003.University.Act.on.intra-university.governance.issues.and.the.universities’.implementation.of.the.Act.in.the.sense.of.intra-university.gov-ernance..More.specifically,.we.assess.the.involvement.of.staff.and.students.in.intra-univer-sity.decision.making.processes,.the.freedom.of.research,.and.the.free.academic.debate.
4.1 University autonomy4.1.1University autonomy: a central objectiveIn.line.with.international.trends,.the.2003.University.Act.changed.the.status.of.universities.from.being.state.institutions.to.autonomous.bodies.within.the.public.sector..This.changed.the.relative.responsibilities.of.the.universities.and.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.(henceforth.referred.to.as.the.Ministry).in.its.oversight.role.over.the.universi-ties..The.overall.task.of.the.university.board.under.the.Act.is.to.“safeguard.the.university’s.interests.as.an.educational.and.research.institution.and.determine.guidelines.for.its.organ-isation,.long.term.activities.and.development”..The.Minister.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.(henceforth.the.Minister).“is.charged.with.formulating.the.framework.for.the.universities’.activities;.determining.society’s.requirements.for.the.universities’.activities,.and.the.size.of.the.subsidies.from.the.Danish.state.to.support.these.activities;.safeguard-ing.the.operational.reality.facing.the.university.management.and.encouraging.the.manage-ment.to.make.the.sensible.decisions.from.a.socio-economic.perspective”.[E2,.p.2]...For.public.institutions,.such.as.the.Danish.universities,.it.is.essential.to.ensure.an.ad-equate.balance.between.autonomy.and.accountability..In.order.to.maintain.a.high,.or.even.world-class.standard,.the.universities.need.room.to.operate.and.develop,.while.at.the.same.time.the.tax.payers.have.a.legitimate.right.to.oversee.that.the.universities.use.the.27
4. UniversiTy governance
substantial.public.funding.prudently..The.Panel.finds.that.the.2003.Act.provides.for.a.high.level.of.autonomy.of.the.universities.in.appropriate.balance.with.accountability..The.Act.itself.does.not.constrain.the.universi-ties.from.establishing.a.satisfactory.level.of.autonomy.and.accountability.–.including.the.freedom.to.develop.distinctive.individual.institutional.profiles,.while.at.the.same.time.documenting.for.society.how.the.public.resources.are.spent.on.universities’.activities.and.achievements.On.basis.of.its.interviews.and.the.submissions.it.has.received,.the.Panel.also.concludes.that.within.the.university.sector.and.among.various.stakeholders.there.are.widespread.consensus.that.the.Danish.universities.have.gained.greater.autonomy.through.the.2003.Act..In.general,.universities.appear.to.have.become.more.dynamic.because.of.the.newly.gained.autonomy..The.Act.is.generally.welcomed.and.by.and.large,.the.stakeholders.view.the.2003.Act.as.a.big.step.forward.in.strengthening.the.universities’.autonomous.status.and.providing.room.for.flexibility.and.innovation..The.university.leadership.also.wel-comes.the.principle.of.dialogue.initiated.by.the.Minister.following.the.2003.Act,.as.well.as.the.new.auditing.approaches.that.have.been.introduced..
4.1.2
continuing constraintsNonetheless,.there.remain.a.number.of.important.constraints.on.university.governance,.and.new.ones.have.been.added.following.the.2003.Act,.many.of.which.are.in.weak.com-pliance.with.the.intentions.of.the.Act.and.are.hampering.the.autonomy.of.the.universities..The.Panel.mainly.sees.these.problems.within.the.following.three.areas:>. Regulations.are.often.used.as.steering.instruments.for.publicly.funded.institutions.which.are.responsible.for.central.societal.tasks..At.present,.extensive.rules.interfere.un-necessarily.with.the.universities’.freedom.to.operate,.particularly.with.respect.to.edu-cational.activities.and.the.institutional.management.structure,.including.very.detailed.rules,.overlapping.rules,.and.rules.which.entail.unnecessary.administrative.burdens.and.unclear.division.of.responsibilities.>. Public.funding.is.a.powerful.steering.instrument,.which.can.be.used.in.a.considerate.manner.to.set.incentives.for.achieving.political.goals,.but.can.also.be.used.in.ways.which.impede.the.autonomy.of.the.universities.>. A.structured.dialogue.between.the.universities.and.the.central.administration.is.im-portant.in.order.to.ensure.an.optimal.balance.between.autonomy.and.accountability..However,.the.prerequisites.given.in.the.Act.for.the.dialogue.can.impede.university.au-tonomy..At.present,.the.restrictions.given.to.the.development.contracts.make.them.less.appropriate.as.goal.setting.instruments.In.the.following,.the.Panel.will.address.the.three.above.topics.
Overregulation / micromanagementA.number.of.Orders.(regulations).have.been.implemented.since.2003,.both.within.and.outside.the.framework.of.the.2003.Act,.covering.the.areas.of.education.and.research.[see.full.list.in.background.document.F5],.and.affecting.university.management..Some.are.de-cided.by.Parliament,.some.by.Government,.and.some.are.decided.at.the.ministerial.level,.by.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.or.other.ministries..Furthermore,.several.regulations.predate.the.2003.Act.but.continue.to.operate.28
4. UniversiTy governance
It.appears.to.the.Panel.that.in.the.current.national.steering.framework.the.universities’.activities.are.to.be.approved.before implementation.as.well.as.controlled.during opera-tion,.while.also.the.output.is.monitored.–.via.orders,.accreditation.criteria.and.procedures,.supervisory.bodies,.development.contracts,.evaluations,.etc..The.Panel.finds.this.to.be.an.unnecessary.duplication.of.control,.which.is.not.only.hampering.university.autonomy.but.also.wastes.university.resources.that.could.be.used.more.effectively.Many.of.the.external.constraints.are.an.intrusion.into.areas.of.competence,.which.should.be.the.responsibility.of.the.universities.themselves..The.constraints.amount.to.a.level,.which.may.be.called.micro-management,.and.limit.the.university.leadership’s.room.to.manoeuvre.and.flexibility.in.its.strategic.decisionmaking.and.positioning..Some.proce-dures,.while.not.limiting.university.autonomy,.are.excessively.bureaucratic.and.generate.inefficiencies.in.university.operations..Considerable.administrative.resources.are.demand-ed.of.the.universities.for.reporting.and.applying.for.approval..This.may.very.well.impede.the.strategic.and.visionary.management.of.the.universities..This.may.arise.due.to.a.dupli-cation.of.oversight,.when.more.than.one.tool.is.used.for.the.same.purpose,.or.if.the.moni-toring.procedures.employed.are.overly.resource-consuming.for.the.universities..
Examples of inconsiderate regulations .Regulations.in.the.area.of.education.are.particularly.limiting.the.universities’.autonomy,.as.they.are.wide-ranging,.covering.decision.areas.such.as.study.programmes,.admission,.and.enrolment.procedures;.awarding.of.parallel.and.joint.degrees;.and:.arrangements.for.credit.transfer,.exams,.grading.scale,.guidance.and.counselling,.and.quality.assurance.procedures...Speeding up enrolment and graduationAs.implied,.the.Panel.has.observed.that.several.tools.are.used.by.the.authorities.and.poli-ticians.to.achieve.the.same.goals..For.example,.in.some.cases,.development.contracts,.taximeter.rules,.recruitment.rules.and.rules.on.student.counselling,.are.all.geared,.in.part,.to.speed.up.enrolment.and.graduation..One.unintended.consequence.is.administrative.inefficiency.because.responding.to.overlapping.demands.ties.down.resources.of.the.uni-versities.and.the.commitment.of.such.resources.reduces.universities’.room.to.manoeuvre.in.substantive.areas.Student intake and exams Another.example.is.that.universities.cannot.decide.on.the.criteria.or.procedure.for.student.intake.on.their.own..Student.enrolment.to.bachelor’s.programmes.is.controlled.centrally.through.an.Order.(issued.in.2008)..The.objective.of.the.changes.introduced.in.2008.and.2009.was.to.expand.enrolment.in.Quota.1.at.the.expense.of.Quota.2..Likewise,.it.was.introduced.that.applicants.applying.no.later.than.two.years.after.having.completed.their.upper.secondary.will.have.the.average.of.their.secondary.school.grades.multiplied.by.1.08.to.raise.eligibility...The.Government.as.well.as.the.Parliament.have.passed.specific.decisions.on.matters.that.can.be.expected.to.lie.in.the.competence.of.the.universities,.such.as.the.abolishment.of.group.exams,.and.the.introduction.of.very.detailed.rules.regarding.re-examination.within.a.short.time.after.students’.failed.passing.of.the.“regular”.exam..Also,.detailed.rules.for.students’.rights.to.complain.are.demanding.excessive.resources.of.the.universities.Study programme accreditation processThe.Panel.is.concerned.that.the.current.practice.of.regulations.and.procedures.regarding.29
4. UniversiTy governance
the.development.of.new.or.adaptation.of.existing.study.programmes.can.have.negative.effects..Quality.control.of.study.programmes.is.necessary,.and.it.is.important.that.uni-versities.function.within.an.agreed.national.quality.assurance.framework..The.difficulty.with.the.current.regulations.is.that.in.addition.to.regular.external.quality.control.of.es-tablished.study.programmes,.the.Danish.universities.must.obtain.accreditation.of.new.study.programmes.in advance.from.ACE.Denmark.(the.accreditation.institution.for.higher.education)..The.requested.resource.commitments.reduce.the.universities’.preparedness.in.responding.rapidly.to.emerging.demands.for.new.skills.and.competences.of.master’s.and.bachelor’s.programme.graduates.The.Panel.supports.the.general.idea.of.the.establishment.of.an.independent.institution.under.the.Danish.Accreditation.Act..It.provides.an.arm’s.length.approach.to.assuring.the.quality.and.relevance.of.the.university.study.programmes,.which.replaced.the.previ-ous.system.where.the.development.of.new.study.programmes.was.directly.controlled.by.the.Ministry.on.the.basis.of.macro-efficiency.concerns.and.criteria...In.the.new.system,.programme.accreditation.is.based.on.an.overall.assessment.of.study.programmes.and.a.combined.weighting.of.all.the.criteria.of.the.Accreditation.Order.(such.as.demand.in.the.labour.market,.research-based.teaching,.depth.of.education,.results.of.the.study.pro-gramme)..The.Minister.still.determines.the.subsidy.status,.title,.specific.admission.require-ments.for.bachelor’s.programmes,.the.prescribed.study.period,.and.any.limit.on.student.intake,.before.the.Accreditation.Council.can.approve.a.study.programme..Through.an.amendment.to.the.Act.in.2007,.universities.are.under.obligation,.as.of.January.2008,.to.set.up.recruitment.panels.for.study.programmes.involving.industry.representatives..There.is.universal.complaint.among.the.universities.against.the.resource.costs.and.inef-ficiency.of.the.in-advance.accreditation.process..The.Panel.finds.the.lengthy.process.from.an.idea.for.a.new.programme.to.the.actual.start.of.the.programme.as.hampering.univer-sities’.quick.response.to.changing.socio-economic.knowledge,.skills,.and.competences.needs..From.that.perspective,.it.would.be.preferable.to.use.also.in.Denmark.the.interna-tionally.dominant.ex-post.evaluation.procedure.instead.of.the.current.ex-ante.accredita-tion.practice.Joint degrees, international collaboration on study programmesIn.terms.of.the.increasing.internationalisation.of.education,.the.Danish.regulations.appear.inflexible.and.are.impeding.the.development.towards.an.increase.of.Danish.students.going.abroad.for.a.shorter.or.longer.period..For.example,.the.cases.of.parallel.and.joint.degrees.are.handled.by.a.separate.Order.that.lays.down.conditions.for.approval..These.regula-tions.take.little.account.of.the.international.environment.in.which.Danish.universities.are.operating..Furthermore,.Danish.regulations.limit.the.international.marketing.of.Danish.study.programmes,.the.establishment.of.joint.degrees,.and.Danish.universities’.participa-tion.in.the.Erasmus.Mundus.programme..For.the.latter,.there.has.been.a.retrograde.step.in.that.initially.the.retention.of.the.taximeter.scheme.for.Erasmus.Mundus.students.was.achieved,.but.has.subsequently.been.discarded.(as.of.March.2009)..Top positions While.several.areas.of.decision.making.regarding.staffing.have.been.transferred.to.the.uni-versities.in.recent.years,.constraints.remain.in.place.as.universities.are.part.of.the.public.sector.financial.and.labour.market.regulations..For.example,.the.number.of.management.positions.of.pay.grade.37.and.above.(E2,.p.12).is.limited,.and.determined.by.the.Ministry.of.Finance..The.cap.on.the.number.of.professorships.was.abolished.in.2008,.but.with.re-spect.to.experienced professors.(pay.grade.38).the.Ministry.of.Finance.has.set.a.maximum.30
4. UniversiTy governance
of.255.positions.for.the.university.sector.as.a.whole..The.appointment.of.a.rector.or.pro-rector.or.any.of.the.designated.academic administrative positions,.including.deans.and.heads.of.departments,.is.subject.to.an.externally.fixed.total.number.per.university.of.such.positions..With.regard.to.staff.remuneration,.universities.do.have.freedom.in.topping.up.the.public-sector.bargained.minimum.scale.for.employees.in pay grades lower than 37..In.addition,.there.are.upper.limits.on.salaries.for.the.different.leadership.positions,.from.rector.to.heads.of.department,.which.must.not.be.exceeded.without.the.approval.of.the.Ministry.of.Finance..As.regards.budgeting,.while.universities.are.free.to.draw.up.their.own.budgets,.and.to.save.and.build.up.equity,.they.are.not.permitted.to.raise.loans.without.prior.authori-sation.from.the.Ministry.of.Finance.[E2]..A.majority.of.the.Danish.universities.do.not.own.their.teaching.and.research.facilities.but.rent.them.from.the.State,.an.issue.that.has.been.opened.up.for.negotiations.by.the.2003.Act..
Sufficient instruments for strategic development?Funding.arrangements,.as.well.as.development.contracts,.are.important.steering.instru-ments.available.to.the.government..They.can.be.tools.for.strategic.steering,.without.resort-ing.to.direct.operational.intervention,.or.they.can.be.used.to.limit.university.flexibility..Much.depends.on.how.they.are.shaped.and.implemented.in.practice..FundingThe.funding.tracks.for.research.in.Denmark,.as.well.as.in.comparable.countries,.are.formed.in.several.ways.which.influence.the.quality.and.effectiveness.of.research.and.pro-mote.research.in.fields.especially.important.for.the.country..In.the.present.funding.system.in.Denmark,.the direct funding consists.of.both.free.funding.(the.basic.funding,.also.called.the.appropriation.funding).and.funding.to.fulfil.the.research-based.public-sector.services..The indirect funding track.consists.both.of.schemes.which.distribute.funding.on.a.compet-itive.non-targeted.basis.with.research.quality.as.the.main.indicator.and.of.schemes.with.pre-set.targets.for.the.research.to.be.funded,.in.Danish.often.called.“free.schemes”.and.“strategic.schemes”.respectively.The.universities.must.have.sufficient.basic.funding.for.developing.their.research.strate-gies.and.prioritisations.as.well.as.for.financing.high.quality.research-based.education.at.PhD,.master’s.and.bachelor’s.levels..The.basic.funding.component.has.increased.consid-erably.since.2003.(see.figure.2.in.annex.7),.but.the.amount.available.by.the.competitive.funding.schemes.have.also.increased,.some.schemes.of.which.demand.co-financing..The.external.“free.funding”,.received.by.individual.researchers.or.research.groups.in.competi-tion.especially.from.national.and.international.funding.councils,.might.also.be.used.by.the.universities.as.a.basis.for.prioritising.top.quality.research.activities.which.are,.or.in.the.longer.term.may.develop.into,.knowledge.areas.of.importance.for.society..This.peer.reviewed.research.may.thus.contribute.to.the.(further).profiling.of.the.university..Funding.received.from.competitive.“strategic.schemes”,.even.though.the.research.is.restricted.to.certain.fields,.may.also.give.the.universities.a.framework.for.further.strategic.prioritisation.decisions.According.to.annex.7,.table.4,.the.overall.share.of.basic.funding.of.the.total.funding.for.re-search.has.dropped.from.64%.(2003).to.56%.(2009)..Nonetheless,.as.mentioned,.in.abso-lute.terms.the.amount.of.basic.funding.has.increased.during.the.later.years,.and.the.ques-tion.whether.the.universities.have.sufficient.room.for.deciding.on.strategic.prioritisations.of.their.own.within.the.present.financing.conditions.is.not.an.easy.one..It.also.depends.on.the.extent.to.which.basic.funding.is.used.for.co-financing.external.funding..The.Panel.finds.31
4. UniversiTy governance
that.the.universities’.internal.considerations.for.outlining.an.institutional.strategy.or.profile,.amongst.other.things,.are.dependent.on.the.quality.and.competitiveness.of.their.academic.staff,.and.the.effectiveness.of.the.institutions’.personnel.policies..Development contractsThe.development.contracts.[described.in.background.document.E7].could.be.used.as.indi-vidual,.helpful.tools.for.the.universities’.strategic.development.and.profiling,.as.well.as.for.realising.important.targets,.such.as.speeding.up.graduation.and.specific.enrolment.targets..However,.we.do.not.find.the.development.contracts.in.their.current.practice.effective.enough.as.such.steering.instruments,.as.the.explanatory.notes.to.the.University.Act.make.them.less.appropriate.for.this.role..The.development.contracts.have.become.too.detailed.and.process-oriented..In.practice.they.consist.of.a.list.of.indicators,.on.which.universities.provide.data...For.an.overview.of.the.university.sector,.the.Parliament,.as.well.as.the.Ministry,.obviously.needs.comprehensive.information.and.statistics.on.the.universities’.performance..This.in-formation.is.necessary.and.can.be.developed.in.dialogue.with.the.universities,.but.it.does.not.necessarily.belong.in.a.development.contract...
Corrective action taken so farRecognising.the.constraints.placed.on.university.flexibility,.the.Minister.has.initiated.sev-eral.committees.and.working.groups.to.identify.areas.where.university.autonomy.could.be.strengthened.and.where.the.rules.do.not.correspond.with.requirements.in.the.explanatory.notes.to.the.Draft.Bill.for.the.2003.University.Act..Many.university-Ministry.issues.have.been.resolved.through.this.mechanism.and.the.Ministry.is.continuing.to.look.into.areas.where.regulation.can.be.simplified.or.scrapped..At.the.time.of.the.decision.on.the.2003.University.Act,.the.political.parties.behind.the.Act.listed.ten.degrees.of.freedom.which.should.be.sought.established..Nine.of.these.areas.were.implemented.[E2,.p.3]..The.tenth,.an.increase.in.the.maximum.amount.which.can.be.earmarked.for.university.construc-tion.without.separate.application.to.the.Finance.Committee,.has.been.approved.recently..However,.it.is.the.impression.of.the.Panel.that.the.universities.do.not.see.these.degrees.of.freedom.as.the.core.of.institutional.autonomy..In.2007,.the.Minister.appointed.a.committee.which.has.come.up.with.an.additional.ten.areas.where.further.de-regulation.is.being.con-sidered.[E2,.p.3]..Eight.of.these.areas.have.reportedly.been.implemented.in.2008.–.2009..
4.1.3
Universities’ progress regarding autonomyThe.development.of.university.autonomy.in.the.period.after.2003.was.dependent.on.the.extent.to.which.the.universities.have.been.able.to.use.the.opportunities.offered.by.the.University.Act.for.becoming.strategic.actors.and.develop.more.direct.and.effective.rela-tionships.with.society,.including.the.private.sector.and.the.international.research.com-munity..As.discussed.in.the.previous.sections,.the.Panel.has.observed.that.to.some.extent.the.universities.have.been.hampered.in.the.development.of.their.strategic.capacities.by.a.dense.set.of.government.regulations..Nonetheless,.this.situation.does.not.mean.that.the.universities.have.been.paralyzed.and.have.had.no.room.to.manoeuvre.at.all..Therefore,.in.this.section,.the.Panel.generally.discusses.how.the.universities.have.used.the.opportunities.for.autonomy.offered.by.the.2003.University.Act..Has.the.university.sector.as.a.whole.become.more.strategic.and.diverse?.Are.there.signs.of.differences.between.the.uni-versities.with.respect.to.the.ways.in.which.the.2003.University.Act.has.been.implemented?
32
4. UniversiTy governance
The.Panel.has.conducted.its.evaluation.in.the.transition.from.what.has.been.called.the.first.generation.university.management.to.the.second.generation..The.first.generation.of.university.managers.has.in.many.respects.had.to.get.used.to.the.new.responsibilities.as.well.as.opportunities.offered.by.the.University.Act..At.the.same.time,.the.university.Boards.have.had.to.find.their.role.in.stimulating.the.strategic.positioning.of.the.universi-ties..As.indicated,.the.universities.have.been.hampered.by.the.Ministry.and.Parliament.who.have.interfered.in.many.ways.in.the.details.of.the.day-to-day.operations.of.the.uni-versities..In.addition,.as.will.be.discussed.in.following.sections,.overall.the.university.managers.have.also.had.difficulties.in.finding.the.right.balance.between.an.executive.leadership.style.and.the.need.to.involve.staff.and.students.in.academic.and.administrative.decision.making.processes.University.autonomy.is.not.an.aim.in.itself..In.the.Danish.case,.the.reforms.of.the.2000s.were.expected,.amongst.other.things,.to.lead.to.more.intra-sector.diversity.through.univer-sity.profiling..There.are.a.number.of.indications.that.suggest.that.the.universities.are.be-coming.more.strategically.oriented.and.are.taking.the.responsibilities.seriously.that.have.been.transferred.to.them..A.first.indication.consists.of.the.strategic.plans.that.most.of.the.universities.have.produced..Even.though.there.are.differences.between.these.plans.when.it.comes.to.strategic.focus.and.the.clarity.and.consistency.of.the.strategic.goals.included,.they.nonetheless.show.that.the.universities.are.in.a.process.of.becoming.strategic.actors..A.second.indication.can.be.found.in.the.careful.attempts.of.a.number.of.the.universities.to.develop.an.explicit.institutional.profile,.amongst.other.things,.by.using.part.of.the.basic.funding.to.stimulate.research.programmes.in.areas.where.they.have.a.strong.track.record..In.addition,.some.universities.have.begun.to.proactively.support.researchers.or.research.units.in.their.applications.to.strategic.research.funds,.e.g..the.ERC..The.university.Boards.have.played.an.important.role.in.this..Overall,.the.Board.members.whom.the.Panel.met.during.its.visits.in.August.2009.have.emphasized.the.importance.of.further.strengthening.the.relationships.of.the.universities.to.society.in.the.coming.period..Developing.a.clearer.institutional.profile.was.regarded.as.a.core.element.in.this.Many.countries.around.the.world,.e.g..Australia,.Finland,.Germany,.Japan,.the.Nether-lands,.and.the.UK,.are.adapting.their.university.governance.approach.in.order.to.create.the.conditions.under.which.their.universities.can.compete.at.world.class.level..If.the.Danish.university.system.is.to.become.a.genuine.world.class.system,.two.basic.govern-ance.conditions.have.to.be.fulfilled..Firstly,.the.Government.and.Parliament.have.to.shift.their.university.governance.approach.from.detailed.regulation.to.‘steering.at.a.distance’..Secondly,.the.universities.have.to.become.more.proactive.and.focused.in.developing.stra-tegic.priority.areas.and.activities..Only.the.universities.themselves.are.able.to.determine.in.which.areas.they.can.and.want.to.compete.at.world-class.level,.even.if.external.peer.reviews.are.helpful.for.their.decisions..In.the.abovementioned.institutional.strategic.plans,.confirmed.in.the.Panel’s.visits,.the.contours.of.these.university.priority.areas.carefully.become.visible..In.most.cases.an.important.first.step.has.been.made,.though.a.lot.of.work.still.needs.to.be.done.within.the.universities..The.first.years.after.2003.can.be.regarded.as.a.learning.period.for.all.involved.in.university.management.in.Denmark..The.Panel.points.in.this.report.to.changes.which.are.recom-mendable.in.the.governance.approach.with.respect.to.higher.education..The.recommend-ed.approach.can.be.summarised.as.moving.from.detailed.government.regulation.to.‘steer-ing.at.a.distance’,.based.on.a.high.level.of.trust.in.the.capacities.of.the.universities.to.use.the.institutional.autonomy.in.the.expected.way..Obviously,.such.a.trust.has.to.be.‘earned’.by.the.universities..They.have.to.show.that.they.are.capable.of.operating.as.strategic.ac-33
4. UniversiTy governance
tors..This.can.be.regarded.as.one.of.the.core.challenges.for.the.second.generation.univer-sity.management.in.Denmark:.The.need.to.create.the.conditions.and.take.the.decisions.that.will.allow.their.university.to.develop.an.appropriate.institutional.profile..This.has.to.be.in.line.with.the.university’s.academic.strengths,.and.make.it.possible.for.the.university.to.participate.in.the.global.knowledge.competition.in.such.a.way.that.it.contributes.to.further.strengthening.the.global.competitiveness.of.the.Danish.economy..
4.1.4
recommendations on autonomyIn.the.Panel’s.evaluation.framework.(chapter.3).a.main.issue.is.whether.the.2003.Uni-versity.Act.and.other.steering.instruments.following.the.Act,.have.influenced.university.autonomy.and.to.what.extent.the.universities.operate.as.autonomous.and.accountable.public.institutions..The.Panel.concludes.that.the.universities.have.gained.greater.autonomy.through.the.2003.University.Act.and.have.become.more.dynamic.because.of.the.newly.found.autonomy..Notwithstanding.these.developments,.there.remain.many.constraints.on.university.auton-omy..In.the.Panel’s.opinion,.these.are.an.expression.by.the.Parliament,.Government.and.ministries.of.low.trust.in.the.current.capacity.or.willingness.of.the.newly.autonomous.uni-versities.to.deliver.on.national.strategic.goals.set.for.them..Many.regulations.and.dialogue-based.demands.placed.on.the.universities.go.beyond.their.expected.role.as.general.steer-ing.strategies.in.pursuit.of.the.politically.set.system-wide.objectives..Instead.they.encroach.on.the.university.management.prerogatives.–.they.intrude.on.university.decision-making.regarding.“how.best.to.achieve”.the.overall.targets.of.the.political.system...
R
recommendations: implementing a high-trust strategyIn.the.Panel’s.opinion.the.way.forward.is.to.develop.a.high-trust.strategy.that.stimulates.the.universities.to.deliver.on.mutually.agreed.missions.by.allowing.them.to.operate.in.practice.under.higher.levels.of.autonomy.than.is.currently.the.case..The.approach.is.to.find.less.intrusive.accountability.mechanisms.that.would.go.hand.in.hand.with.new.de-regulations.and.would.require.changes.on.the.part.of.the.Parliament,.the.ministries.as.well.as.the.universities..To.this.end,.the.Panel.offers.the.following.two.recommendations,.which.may.require.ad-justment.of.the.explanatory.notes.to.the.bill.for.the.University.Act:.>. The.Parliament.and.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.should.con-sider.reviewing.current.regulations.and.reconsidering.those.that.curtail.universities’.freedom.in.their.fields.of.competence.The.Panel.recommends.that.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.in.col-laboration.with.the.universities.actively.examines.all.relevant.regulations,.including.those.from.other.Ministries,.with.a.view.to.determine.their.continued.use,.or.under-take.actions.for.scrapping.them.or.replacing.them.by.other.instruments..The.decision.should.be.based.on.the.Minister’s.task.[as.identified.in.the.background.document.E2].as.“formulating.the.framework.for.the.universities’.activities;.determining.society’s.requirements.for.the.universities’.activities.and.the.size.of.the.subsidies.from.the.Dan-ish.state.to.support.these.activities”..Regulations.that.infringe.on.the.task.of.the.univer-sities.to.“safeguard.the.university’s.interests.as.an.educational.and.research.institution.
34
4. UniversiTy governance
and.determine.guidelines.for.its.organisation,.long.term.activities.and.development”.should.be.removed..This.may.require.an.adjusted.explanatory.note.to.the.University.Act.Thus.a.clear.distinction.should.be.drawn.between.what.constitutes.“strategic.objec-tives”.for.the.sector,.the.determination.of.which.should.be.the.province.of.the.Parlia-ment.and.the.Ministry,.and.what.constitutes.“how.to”.achieve.those.objectives,.which.properly.lies.within.the.competence.of.the.universities..Only.those.regulations.that.deal.with.setting.the.strategic.objectives.should.be.considered.for.retaining,.while.with.respect.to.those.regulations.that.deal.with.the.areas.where.the.universities.can.be.ex-pected.to.have.the.expertise.and.experience.“to.know.best”.removal.should.be.consid-ered.Dialogue.between.the.universities.and.the.Ministry.should.be.used.to.deal.with.sys-tem-wide.objectives..The.issue.of.reducing.drop-out.rates.is.an.example:.rather.than.the.Parliament.introducing.a.regulation.for.this.purpose,.it.should.engage.in.a.dialogue.with.the.universities.to.come.to.a.decision.concerning.the.actions.the.universities.can.take.themselves..The.taximeter.system.is.a.good.example.of.a.tool,.which.can.be.used.to.provide.incentives.for.achieving.system-wide.goals..Compared.to.the.structures.for.quality.assurance.of.university.study.programmes.in.other.countries,.the.current.Danish.accreditation.system.is.heavily.prescriptive.and.in.advance.control-oriented..It.symbolises.a.lack.of.trust.in.the.universities.since.the.qual-ity.and.relevance.of.programmes.offered.by.Danish.universities.do.not.seem.to.warrant.any.general.concern..The.present.control.is.taking.place.ex-ante,.while.the.experience.elsewhere.suggests.that.ex-post.control.is.much.more.effective..The.Panel.proposes.that.the.overall.directions.of.ACE.Denmark.should.be.reviewed.to.make.them.consist-ent.with.broad.policy.directions.aimed.at.further.strengthening.university.autonomy.and.consistent.with.governmental.steering.from.a.distance..An.alternative.model.should.be.considered,.which.puts.responsibility.on.each.university.to.maintain.rigor-ous.internal.quality.review.processes.and.allows.a.flexible.response.to.the.competence.needs.of.society..
>.The.Parliament.and.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.should.con-sider.to.define.the.development.contracts.as.goal.steering.instruments.As.various.autonomy.issues.arose.following.the.implementation.of.the.University.Act,.the.Minister.set.up.committees.and.working.groups,.composed.of.Ministry.and.uni-versity.officials,.to.discuss.emerging.problems.and.propose.their.resolution..Setting.up.these.mechanisms.is.a.clear.signal.of.the.Ministry’s.commitment.to.enhancing.univer-sity.autonomy..The.Panel.recommends.this.confidence-building,.positive.approach...However,.the.development.contracts.and.the.“rules”.for.them.laid.down.in.the.ex-planatory.notes.to.the.University.Act,.need.to.be.carefully.scrutinised.in.order.to.make.the.development.contracts.individual,.helpful.tools.for.the.universities’.strategic.devel-opment.and.profiling.as.well.as.tools.for.important.governmental.targets..The.Panel.recommends.the.development.contracts.to.become.more.evident.goal.steering.instru-ments..In.order.to.fulfil.such.a.role,.the.development.contracts.have.to.be.re-oriented.to.focus.on.overall.targets,.specific.for.each.university,.and.without.detailed.process.targets..This.may.well.include.system-wide.issues.which.at.present.are.tackled.by.regu-35
4. UniversiTy governance
lations..For.the.universities’.use.of.the.contracts.as.strategic.development.and.profiling.tools,.the.universities.will.have.to.contribute.with.information.on.their.strategic.goals.Furthermore,.statistical.data.and.other.information.for.maintaining.overview.of.the.proceedings.of.the.whole.university.sector.should.not.be.handled.within.the.frame-work.of.the.development.contracts..Developing.a.system-wide.knowledge.base.on.the.universities.is.a.worthy.objective,.but.the.construction.of.indicators,.especially.those.for.monitoring.purposes,.should.be.developed.in.agreement.with.the.universities..They.should.be.linked.to.a.process.of.self-monitoring.by.the.universities..
4.2 codetermination and academic freedom4.2.1codeterminationAs.explained.in.Chapter.3,.codetermination.of.employees.and.students.at.Danish.universi-ties.is.an.important.element.of.the.Danish.university.reforms,.closely.linked.to.the.issue.of.university.autonomy..The.Danish.tradition.places.high.value.on.codetermination.based.on.the.general.expectation.in.the.country.and.on.modern.management.practice.for.knowl-edge.organisations.such.as.universities..The.Panel.views.codetermination.at.the.Danish.universities.as.involvement.of.academic.staff.in.the.decision-making.processes.regarding.research.and.education.matters,.involvement.of.students.in.issues.related.to.education.and.study.programmes,.involvement.of.administrative.staff.in.the.decision-making.proc-esses.on.administrative.issues,.and.involvement.of.technical.staff.in.the.decision-making.processes.concerning.technical.matters..We.find.that.such.codetermination.at.the.universities.is.important.for.securing.the.best.possible.environment.for.education.and.research..We.are.therefore.of.the.opinion.that.this.area.requires.serious.attention.
4.2.1.1 changes brought by the 2003 University actThe.2003.University.Act.has.changed.the.framework.for.the.involvement.of.staff.and.students.in.university.decision.making.processes..Prior.to.the.Act,.university.leaders.were.elected.by.the.employees.and.the.students..The.Act.introduced.a.range.of.changes.to.the.organisation.of.university.leadership,.including.a.university.board.and.appointed.leaders,.and.left.internal.organisational.issues.in.the.hands.of.the.new.leadership.sub-ject.to.the.general.directions.provided.by.the.Act..The.Act.stipulates.rules.for.participa-tion.of.staff.and.students.in.the.university.board.and.various.decision.making.and.ad-visory.bodies.of.the.university..In.addition,.the.explanatory.notes.to.the.bill.for.the.Act.stipulate.obligations.of.deans.and.heads.of.department.to.ensure.involvement.of.staff.and.students.Under.the.2003.Act,.university.boards.include.representatives.from.the.academic.staff.(at.least.one),.the.technical.and.administrative.staff.(one).and.the.students.(two)..The.aca-demic.council.and.the.PhD.committee.at.university.or.faculty.level.have.representatives.from.academic.staff.and.students..Study.boards.operate.at.department.or.faculty.level.with.academic.staff.and.student.participation..Under.the.new.hierarchical,.unitary.management.system,.the.board.appoints.and.dis-36
4. UniversiTy governance
misses.the.rector,.and.appoints.and.dismisses.the.pro-rectors.and.the.university.directors,.following.recommendations.from.the.rector..The.rector.appoints.the.deans.(in.the.institu-tions.where.there.are.deans),.who.in.turn.appoint.the.heads.of.department.and,.where.this.applies,.heads.of.the.PhD.schools.as.well.as.directors.of.studies,.based.on.recommen-dations.from.study.boards..This.system.replaces.the.previous.system.of.elections.to.these.positions.in.which.the.staff.and.the.students.participated..The.2003.University.Act.does.not.spell.out.internal.decision-making.procedures.in.detail;.these.are.left.to.the.individual.university.to.decide..The.Act.also.requires.for.each.univer-sity.that.academic.councils.are.set.up.composed.of.academic.staff.and.students,.while.technical.staff.can.participate.as.observers..The.composition.of.the.study.boards.has.re-mained.unchanged.since.the.1970.Higher.Education.Act..Study.board.members.comprise.in.equal.measure.of.elected.staff.and.student.representatives..Through.an.amendment.in.2007,.the.University.Act.now.includes.clauses.for.setting.up.PhD.committees,.with.equal.participation.from.academic.staff.and.PhD.students,.to.give.PhD.students.a.say.in.matters.with.respect.to.their.study.programmes.and.other.aspects.of.relevance.to.their.employ-ment.situation..As.implied.in.the.beginning.of.the.section,.the.explanatory.notes.to.the.University.Act.indicate.that.the.Dean.also.is.to.set.up.an.organisation.that.is.able.to.man-age.all.tasks.of.the.main.academic.area.by.involvement.of.students.and.the.academic,.technical.and.administrative.staff.and.that.the.Head.of.Department.is.to.organise.the.de-partment.so.that.it.is.able.to.manage.all.relevant.tasks.by.involvement.of.the.students.and.the.academic,.technical.and.administrative.staff.Furthermore,.within.the.general.labour.market.rules.in.Denmark,.collaboration.com-mittees.are.set.up.at.the.universities,.which.have.the.objective.of.bringing.together.staff.(academic.and.technical/administrative.staff).and.leadership.on.issues.of.staff.policy.and.working.conditions,.matters.concerning.long-term.development.as.well.as.routine.matters.affecting.the.work.environment..It.is.up.to.each.university.to.form.such.committees..Pro-vision.for.shop.stewards.(who.are.elected),.Safety.Committee.and.Workplace.assessments.(WPA).are.also.included.in.the.general.labour.market.framework..........
4.2.1.2 experience and problemsPanel.interviews.and.findings.of.the.Capacent.Survey.paint.a.mixed.picture.of.how.co-determination.is.working.out.in.Danish.universities..There.is.high.variety.in.the.degree.of.satisfaction.expressed.with.the.present.codetermination.processes,.across.institutions,.staff.categories.(academic.staff,.technical.and.administrative.staff,.students).and.levels.of.decision-making..During.its.visits,.the.Panel.heard.strong.voices.of.dissatisfaction.with.the.experienced.lack.of.effective.codetermination,.especially.among.the.academic.staff..The.academic.councils,.for.example,.are.seen.mostly.as.non-influential..Among.the.technical.and.ad-ministrative.staff,.the.Panel.got.the.impression.that.there.is.dissatisfaction.due.to.insuf-ficient.involvement.in.the.decision-making.processes.at.department.and.faculty.level..Among.students,.the.study.boards.and.PhD-committees.are.seen.as.important.bodies..Students.e.g..readily.referred.to.study.boards,.as.a.way.to.discuss.problems.with.educa-tion.programmes,.but.several.objected.to.the.limited.influence.of.study.boards.and.said,.for.example,.that.deans.hold.decision.powers.that.study.boards.should.have.Overall,.the.Panel.thus.heard.of.perceptions.of.a.decrease.in.involvement.of.academic.staff.and.students.in.the.decision-making.processes..Most.people.interviewed.relate.the.37
4. UniversiTy governance
problem.not.in.the.first.place.to.the.hierarchical.management.provisions.of.the.Univer-sity.Act.as.such,.but.see.it.rather.resulting.from.a.lack.of.commitment.to.codetermina-tion.on.the.part.of.the.leadership,.and.lack.of.managerial.skills.for.establishing.intra-university.structures.and.procedures.for.involvement..The.Panel.gained.the.impression,.though,.that.in.some,.but.not.all,.institutions.the.leadership.has.attempted.seriously.to.develop.an.organisational.culture.in.support.of.codetermination.The.Panel.observes.that.current.weaknesses.in.the.codetermination.structures.and.proc-esses.are.also.recognised.by.several.stakeholders,.including.the.Danish.Confederation.of.Professional.Associations.(AC),.Universities.Denmark.and.the.university.top.leader-ship..These.stakeholders.have.expressed.to.the.Panel.that.they.consider.the.period.since.2003.as.representing.“first–generation.university.management”,.which.includes.an.in-sufficient.level.of.codetermination..The.stakeholders.see.a.challenge.in.the.need.to.move.university.governance.to.the.next.stage.–.second-generation university management.–.i.e..modern.management.adequate.for.knowledge-intensive.institutions.like.universities..This.would,.among.other.things,.include.a.satisfactory.level.of.academic.staff.and.stu-dent.involvement.in.the.intra-university.decision-making.processes..It.is.the.Panel’s.impression.that.the.university.top.leaders.find.it.a.challenge.to.recruit.qualified.leaders,.particularly.at.the.department.level..Many.of.the.present.Heads.of.De-partment.are.the.same.as.before.2003..Many.of.them.are.experienced.within.research.and.education,.but.not.in.the.area.of.university.management..We.find.it.particularly.impor-tant.that.the.leaders.have.experience.and.skills.in.both.research.and.education,.and.in.management..However,.according.to.the.top.managers.of.the.universities,.the.market.of.persons.who.at.the.same.time.have.leadership.and.management.qualifications,.and.expe-rience.at.a.senior.level.in.academic.research.and.education.is.still.small..This.aspect.has.to.be.taken.seriously.by.the.universities,.and.they.should.take.steps.to.develop.adequate.leadership.career.structures.as.well.as.adequate.leadership.training..Professional.leader-ship.training.programmes.for.university.leaders.at.all.levels.as.well.as.actual.and.potential.Board.members.are.very.important..The.issue.of.codetermination.should.form.an.impor-tant.element.of.such.training...Overall,.the.Panel.finds.that.the.decision-making.ability.has.been.strengthened.through.the.new.executive.leadership.provisions.of.the.2003.University.Act..However,.at.the.same.time.the.Panel.is.of.the.opinion.that.the.involvement.of.academic.staff.and.students.in.the.decision-making.processes.in.Danish.universities.is.in.need.of.specific.improvements..As.the.management.structure.introduced.in.the.2003.University.Act.forms.the.basis.for.the.decision-making.at.universities,.it.has.to.be.connected.with.a.greater.involvement.of.aca-demic.staff.and.students.in.academic.and.educational.issues..The.notes.to.the.bill.stipu-late.obligations.of.deans.and.heads.of.department.with.respect.to.involvement.of.staff.and.students,.but.we.find.that.this.has.not.been.implemented.by.the.universities.to.a.sufficient.extent..There.is.thus.need.for.an.improvement.of.the.culture.in.the.universities.in.sup-port.of.good.structures.and.procedures.for.involvement.of.staff.and.students.in.decision-making.processes..Improvements.in.this.area.cannot.be.left.to.leadership.sensitivity.on.the.issue,.and.ways.should.be.found.for.holding.management.accountable.for.their.perform-ance.regarding.codetermination..This.is.a.system-wide.and.strategic.issue.that.deserves.attention.at.national.political.level..We.recommend.therefore.that.the.University.Act,.or.the.explanatory.notes.to.the.Act,.should.be.amended.to.include.a.statement.directed.towards.the.university.boards.in.order.to.ensure.that.the.universities.implement.effective.involvement.of.staff.and.students..To.38
4. UniversiTy governance
this.effect,.the.university.Board.should.require.senior.leaders.at.all.levels.in.the.university.to.develop,.in.collaboration.with.staff.and.students,.procedures.and.organisational.mecha-nisms.for.ensuring.effective.involvement.of.staff.and.students.in.compliance.with.modern.management.practice.in.knowledge.organisations.and.the.Nordic.traditions.in.the.univer-sity.sector..The.Board.should.also.ensure.implementation.of.procedures.for.a.high.degree.of.transparency.in.nominating.university.top.managers,.including.the.external.members.of.the.Board..
4.2.2
freedom of researchFreedom.of.research.is.a.fundamental.principle.of.university.life,.and.both.governments.and.universities.must.ensure.respect.for.this.fundamental.requirement..This.is,.among.other.things,.stated.in.the.Magna.Charta.Universitatum,.a.declaration,.signed.in.1988.by.a.few.hundred.rectors.from.European.universities..Since.then,.many.more.university.rec-tors.and.their.equivalents,.also.from.outside.Europe,.have.signed.the.Magna.Charta..As.indicated.in.this.declaration,.to.meet.the.needs.of.the.world.around.it,.university.research.must.be.morally.and.intellectually.independent..The.concept.of.freedom.of.research.is.often.used.very.broadly..Clearly,.this.is.not.un-limited,.as.researchers.have.to.do.research.in.the.field.of.their.employment.and.function.within.the.quality.standards.of.their.specific.academic.field..Within.these.constraints,.the.general.principles.often.invoke.to.give.the.concept.a.functional.definition.that.researchers.should.be.allowed.to.freely.select.their.research.topics,.freely.develop.their.research.meth-odology.and.be.free.to.publish.their.research.results.In.the.Danish.university.sector.the.topic.‘freedom.of.research’.is.a.complicated.issue.that.has.various.legal,.political.and.economic.dimensions..One.of.the.core.dimensions.with.le-gal.and.political.connotations.concerns.article.17.2.of.the.2003.University.Act..This.article.is.seen.by.many.academic.staff.members.of.the.universities.as.a.major.symbol.of.the.con-troversies.around.the.Act,.as.it.gives.the.institutional.leadership.the.formal.power.to.tell.individual.staff.members.which.academic.tasks.to.perform..The.article.could.be.regarded.as.an.intrusion.into.traditional.values.and.rights.of.academic.university.staff..During.the.university.visits.the.Panel.heard.very.strong.views.on.this.article.from.many.members.of.academic.staff..These.are.mainly.driven.by.a.fear.of.possible.infringements.of.the.individual.staff.members’.traditional.freedom.to.determine.the.nature.and.focus.of.their.own.teaching.and.research.activities..On.the.other.hand,.many.academic.staff.members.did.not.view.article.17.2.as.a.real.problem..In.their.view.practically.all.univer-sity.staff.members.can.in.practice.determine.their.own.research.agenda.and.choice.of.methodology.within.the.specific.strategic,.scientific.quality.and.financial.frameworks.of.their.institution.Although.the.Panel.has.heard.about.only.a.few.examples.of.the.explicit.use.of.the.article.in.practice,.we.find.that.the.question.can.be.raised.whether.article.17.2.in.all.its.details.fits.the.Danish.and.European.traditions.with.respect.to.academic.freedom..In.addition,.the.strong.controversies.around.the.article,.even.though.the.issue.may.be.mainly.symbolic,.have.a.negative.impact.on.the.intra-university.governance.relationships.and.the.effective-ness.of.the.university.leadership..Taking.these.considerations.into.account,.the.Panel.recommends.the.Parliament.to.remove.or.reformulate.the.article.17.2..39
4. UniversiTy governance
Funding.is.another.important.dimension.in.relation.to.research.freedom..According.to.the.Capacent.survey,.“researchers.generally.believe.that.both.individual.and.institutional.free-dom.has.been.weakened.since.2003,.and.that.the.individual.freedom.has.been.weakened.the.most..However,.the.researchers.are.generally.satisfied.with.the.conditions.of.their.own.research.freedom.despite.the.increasing.limitations.of.research.freedom..This.tendency.is.also.supported.by.the.qualitative.interviews.”.The.individual.research.freedom.is,.according.to.the.participants.in.the.survey,.mainly.threatened.by.the.changes.in.the.public.research.funding.system.during.the.latest.years..A.majority.of.the.respondents.find.that.in.the.overall.public.research.funding,.the.relative.share.of.competitive.and.targeted.funding.has.increased.at.the.expense.of.a.decreasing.share.of.basic.funding..This.is.felt.to.have.had.a.negative.impact.on.the.individual.free-dom.of.research..As.discussed.above.(in.section.4.1.2),.the.overall.share.of.basic.funding.in.the.total.public.funding.of.research.has.dropped.from.64%.(2003).to.56%.(2009),.al-though.the.total.amount.of.basic.funding.has.increased..However,.the.figures.do.not.allow.for.a.more.careful.analysis.of.the.development.in.the.amounts.of.basic.research.funding.per.university,.nor.of.the.influence.of.the.mergers.on.the.balance.between.basic.and.tar-geted/competitive.research.funding.per.university..Internationally,.there.are.two.separate.approaches.when.it.comes.to.national.strategies.for.stimulating.excellent.research.through.public.funding.investments..The.first.concerns.a.focus.on.supporting.a.limited.number.of.centres.of.research.excellence.through.nation-ally.organised.competitions..This.approach.implies.that.the.universities.themselves.have.little.influence.on.the.selection.of.the.national.centres.that.in.general.are.selected.by.research.councils,.usually.in.a.close.alignment.with.the.national.science.ministry..The.other.approach.consists.of.making.a.large.amount.of.‘free.research.funding’.directly.avail-able.to.the.universities,.thereby.allowing.them.to.determine.how.they.themselves.want.to.stimulate.research.excellence.within.their.institution..Each.approach.leads.to.a.specific.kind.of.research.dynamics,.each.with.its.own.pros.and.cons..The.Danish.research.funding.mechanism.has.certain.elements.in.line.with.the.second.approach..As.a.consequence,.the.amount.of.direct.‘free.research.funding’.(basic.funding).available.within.the.Danish.uni-versities.for.strategic.research.investments.is.relative.large.in.comparison.with.most.other.European.countries,.e.g..the.Nordic.neighbours.Norway.and.Sweden.To.the.extent.that.the.competitive.funding.is.‘free’,.i.e..independent.of.pre-set.research.dis-ciplines,.as.is.the.funding.of.the.Danish.Independent.Research.Councils.and.the.European.Research.Council,.it.even.plays.a.role.for.promoting.freedom.of.research.in.the.sense.that.it.is.granted.to.individual.researchers.with.new.ideas.which.may.not.find.intra-institu-tional.funding.despite.high.quality..At.the.same.time,.the.Panel.finds.it.natural.in.national.and.international.context.to.have.funding.schemes.with.strategically.pre-set.research.dis-ciplines,.for.e.g..finding.solutions.for.particular.societal.needs.or.problems..Such.schemes.have,.of.course,.a.potential.for.impeding.the.research.freedom,.at.least.if.they.constitute.a.too.large.share.of.the.total.research.funding.All.in.all,.the.Panel.finds.it.important.with.a.balanced.funding.system.which.includes.a.substantial.share.of.basic.funding.directly.to.the.universities,.but.also.contains.substantial.competitive.funding.schemes.–.some.for.“free”.research.and.some.for.research.with.poli-cally/strategically.pre-set.research.fields..The.Panel.is.aware.that.an.increased.demand.for.applying.to.external.funds.contributes.to.the.reported.growing.time.pressure.experienced.by.the.academic.staff..In.the.surveys.40
4. UniversiTy governance
available.to.the.Panel,.many.academic.staff.members.have.indicated.that.the.growing.time.pressure.has.had.a.negative.effect.on.their.ability.to.do.the.research.they.would.like.to.do..The.Panel.is.also.aware.of.the.negative.effects.of.growing.time.pressure,.such.as.stress.and.decreased.working.efficiency,.and.we.acknowledge.that.the.combined.effects.of.these.may.contribute.to.a.situation.in.which.less.time.is.available.to.the.academic.staff.for.conducting.research,.while.a.certain.amount.of.time.must.be.available.for.being.able.to.carry.out.research..However,.it.is.the.question.whether.this.can.be.regarded.as.an.aspect.of.‘freedom.of.research’,.since.the.Panel.find.that.the.latter.concerns.freedom.to.select.research.issues,.freedom.to.develop.research.methodology.and.freedom.to.publish.results,.rather.than.with.the.question.of.available.time.for.conducting.research.
4.2.3
freedom of debateOne.of.the.themes.of.the.evaluation.concerns.the.status.of.the.free.academic.debate.at.the.Danish.universities,.including.the.framework.conditions.under.which.the.academic.debate.takes.place..The.Panel.gained.the.clear.impression.that.there.are.no.essential.problems.with.freedom.of.academic.debate.in.Denmark..Our.observation.is.supported.by.the.results.of.the.Capacent.survey,.which.show.that.the.responding.academics.do.not.see.this.as.a.big.issue..During.our.visits,.we.did.hear.of.a.few.cases.where.freedom.for.debating.was.said.to.have.been.hampered,.but.these.are.few.and.incidental,.and.it.is.thus.our.overall.conclusion.that.the.Danish.researchers.in.general.are.allowed.to.publish.and.participate.in.the.academic.and.public.debate,.of.course.under.certain.ethical.restrictions.as.well.as.restrictions.laid.down.in.laws.on.freedom.of.speech..During.the.Panel’s.visits,.the.engagement.from.staff.and.students.to.give.their.opinion.to.us.shows.a.sound.basic.condition.for.possibilities.to.make.one’s.voice.heard..There.were.plenty.of.opinions.put.forward.to.us,.as.is.customary.in.universities,.especially.on.aca-demic.freedom.and.on.the.academic.leaders,.but.to.a.certain.extent.also.on.the.issue.of.free.academic.debate..Even.though.the.Panel.was.told.about.specific.occasions.where.the.free.expression.in.internal.university.magazines.or.newspapers.reportedly.had.been.de-nied,.it.has.not.been.on.the.Panel’s.agenda.to.further.examine.these.occasions..Neverthe-less,.the.internal.criticism.has.been.voiced,.which.is.important...Another.area.of.discussion.has.been.that.the.existence.of.government.commissioned.re-search.inside.the.universities.may.contribute.to.a.decrease.in.the.free.academic.debate..As.understood.by.the.Panel,.the.free.academic.debate.still.exists.at.the.Danish.universities.and.has.expanded.to.cover.the.merged.GRIs..This.extension.is.important.to.the.Danish.society.The.result.from.the.Capacent.survey.shows.that.academics.more.frequently.take.part.in.the.internal.academic.debate.than.in.the.public.debate..There.is.a.possibility.that.this.re-sult.shows.a.tendency.not.to.be.as.active.in.the.society.outside.the.university.walls.as.one.might.expect..The.burden.on.academics.in.a.competing.academic.world.might.contribute.to.this.tendency..The.awareness.of.the.importance.of.a.free.academic.debate.is.high.in.Denmark,.and.therefore,.the.slightest.restrictions.one.might.suspect.will.be.heavily.and.openly.criticised..This.is.a.good.sign.of.a.healthy.community..The.universities.are.important.institutions.in.contributing.to.an.open.debate.and.new.knowledge.in.society.and.are.thereby.also.a.fun-damental.part.of.a.democratic.society..The.free.press.contributes.to.this..It.is.the.opinion.of.the.Panel.that.the.universities.in.Denmark.fulfil.their.obligation.to.the.Danish.society.in.this.regard..It.is.also.the.opinion.of.the.Panel.that.the.present.legislation.in.Denmark,.41
4. UniversiTy governance
concerning.universities.and.free.academic.debate,.is.appropriate..The.integration.of.the.four.non-merged.GRIs.into.universities.could.contribute.to.an.open.debate.in.all.areas.of.knowledge.development.connected.to.the.Danish.Government.It.is.important.that.the.Danish.political.system,.including.the.different.involved.ministries,.are.aware.of.the.long-term.importance.for.the.Danish.society.of.a.free.academic.debate
4.2.4
recommendations on codetermination and academic freedomIn.the.evaluation.framework.(chapter.3),.the.Panel.raised.the.issue.of.what.impact.the.regulatory.internal.organisation,.including.the.executive.leadership,.has.had.on.the.demo-cratic.and.codetermination.processes,.as.well.as.on.freedom.of.research.and.the.free.aca-demic.debate...
R
recommendations: strengthening of codeterminationThe.Panel.finds.that.the.universities.have.not.implemented.codetermination.procedures.and.structures.to.a.sufficient.extent..The.involvement.of.academic.staff.and.students.in.the.university.decision-making.processes.needs.improvements,.even.though.there.is.a.high.variability.in.the.degree.of.satisfaction.with.the.codetermination.possibilities..As.the.governance.and.leadership.structure.introduced.in.the.2003.University.Act.and.the.ex-planatory.notes.to.the.Act.form.the.basis.for.the.decision-making.processes.at.universities.and.for.the.staff.and.student.involvement.in.these,.we.find.that.it.should.be.adapted.to.support.improved.involvement.of.staff.and.students.in.academic.issues..This.could.meet.the.present.need.for.a.change.in.the.culture.in.the.universities.in.support.of.structures.and.procedures.that.stimulate.involvement.wherever.appropriate..Improvements.in.this.area.may.be.outlined.for.holding.university.leadership.accountable.for.their.performance.re-garding.codetermination..This.is.a.system-wide.and.strategic.issue.that.deserves.attention.from.the.university.Boards.as.well.as.from.the.national.political.level..Accordingly,.the.Panel.makes.the.following.recommendations.regarding.codetermination:.>.The.universities.should.implement.codetermination.procedures.and.structures.to.a.suf-ficient.extent,.in.accordance.with.the.intentions.laid.down.in.the.University.Act..>.The.University.Act,.or.the.explanatory.notes.to.the.Act,.should.be.amended.to.include.a.statement.directed.towards.the.university.boards.to.ensure.intra-institutional.imple-mentation.of.procedures.and.structures.of.codetermination.>. The.university.Boards.should.require.senior.leaders.of.the.university.to.develop,.in.collaboration.with.academic.staff.and.students,.procedures.and.organisational.mecha-nisms.for.ensuring.effective.involvement.of.staff.and.students.in.compliance.with.modern.management.practice.in.knowledge.organisations.and.the.Danish.(and.Nordic).traditions.in.the.university.sector.>. The.university.Boards.should.ensure.implementation.of.procedures.for.a.high.degree.of.transparency.in.nominating.university.top.managers,.including.the.external.members.of.the.Board..>. Professional.leadership.training.programmes.should.be.established.for.university.lead-ers.at.all.levels.as.well.as.actual.and.potential.Board.members,.and.the.issue.of.code-termination.should.form.an.important.element.of.such.training..This.could.be.taken.up.by.Universities.Denmark.as.well.as.the.individual.universities,.since.it.is.in.the.first.place.the.responsibility.of.the.universities.themselves...
42
4. UniversiTy governance
R
recommendation: removal or reformulation of article 17.2The.Panel.recommends.the.article.17.2.in.the.University.Act.to.be.removed.or.reformu-lated.even.though.the.Panel.has.not.found.clear.evidence.of.severe.restrictions.on.the.individual.conditions.for.freedom.of.research.at.the.Danish.universities,.in.terms.of.free.selection.of.research.issues,.free.development.of.research.methodology.and.free.publish-ing.of.results..
43
44
5
The mergers
5.1 introductionThe.university.merger.processes.consisted.of.integration.of.government.research.insti-tutions.(GRIs).into.the.university.sector,.which.were.a.target.directly.embedded.in.the.Globalisation.Strategy;.and.mergers.between.universities,.which.were.initiated.by.the.gov-ernment.subsequent.to.the.decision.on.the.Globalisation.Strategy..The.integration.of.GRIs.had.as.its.main.aims:.to.stimulate.research.synergies.between.until.now.institutionally.separated.sectors,.to.fertilise.the.university.sector.with.practice.oriented.research.leading.to.close.contacts.with.societal,.i.e..private.and.public.sector.agencies,.and.to.make.addi-tional.research.resources.available.for.educational.processes,.leading.to.a.strengthening.of.the.link.between.higher.education.and.research.The.mergers.were.voluntary.as.regards.the.universities;.forced.mergers.would.only.have.been.possible.through.a.change.in.the.existing.University.Act.-.a.change.for.which.there.was.no.majority.in.Parliament..As.regards.the.GRIs.the.merging.decision.should.prefer-ably.be.supported.by.the.boards.of.the.GRIs..While.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.hinted.at.a.preferred.overall.result.of.6.universites,.the.actual.result.of.the.merger.processes.was.a.new.university.sector.consisting.of.8.universities,.while.also.some.of.the.government.research.institutions.remained.independent..The.mergers.were.overall.expected.to.stimulate:> more.interdisciplinary.cooperation.in.education;.> more.flexible.and.relevant.offerings.of.degree.programmes.for.the.Danish.students;> greater.success.for.Danish.universities.in.their.applications.for.EU.research.funding;> higher.quality.(in.the.sense.of.impact).of.the.Danish.university.research.output;.> better.cooperation.between.the.universities.and.the.private.sector.with.respect.to.inno-vation;.> more.effective.knowledge.relationship.between.the.public.research.sector.and.the.sec-tor.ministries..In.accordance.with.the.Panel’s.evaluation.framework,.the.mergers.may.be.seen.as.a.means.to.create.stronger.universities,.especially.in.research,.and.thereby.give.prerequisites.for.strengthening.university.profiles..Furthermore,.the.mergers.between.universities.and.GRIs.are.meant.to.support.the.universities.in.their.response.to.the.needs.of.society,.includ-ing.creating.better.conditions.for.the.universities.contributing.to.economically.relevant.45
5. The mergers
innovations.in.the.private.sector..The.mergers.were.also.expected.to.strengthen.education,.by.bringing.research.staff.from.the.GRI.sector.into.the.universities..In.all.cases,.the.critical.mass.of.knowledge.production.were.supposed.to.be.improved..The.effects.of.the.mergers.are.still.too.early.to.be.clearly.identified,.as.the.merger.decisions.have.taken.place.only.three.years.ago..Obviously,.the.Panel.has.observed.that.the.implemen-tation.phase.is.still.going.on.and.in.some.cases.needs.to.be.accelerated.in.order.to.realise.the.intended.contributions.to.stronger.profiles..Nonetheless,.the.Panel.has.got.the.clear.impres-sion.that.at.most.universities.the.merger.processes.have.acted.in.certain.ways.as.change.drivers..This.concerns.in.the.first.place.changes.at.those.universities.that.have.been.involved.in.mergers..Even.though.at.these.institutions.it.was.in.general.indicated.by.the.academic.staff.that.the.mergers.have.had.limited.influence.and.had.no.direct.impact.on.their.research.activities.as.such,.many.staff.members.still.felt.that.the.mergers.had.either.strengthened.pre-merger.research.collaborations,.created.new.intra-institutional.cooperation.structures.or.other.structural.innovations,.or.had.led.to.new.intra-university.research.funding.initiatives..
5.2 researchConcerning.the.area.of.research.the.mergers.had.a.specific.twofold.goal,.i.e..creating.the.conditions.under.which.firstly.the.impact.of.the.Danish.university.research.output.would.be.further.strengthened,.and.secondly.the.Danish.universities.would.be.more.successful.in.their.applications.for.EU.research.funding..Consequently,.in.this.section.the.focus.is.on.the.extent.to.which.these.two.goals.have.been.realised..
5.2.1
international impact of danish university researchStrong starting positionIt.is.difficult.to.relate.the.effects.on.the.international.impact.of.research.to.the.mergers..In.addition.to.the.general.methodological.problem.resulting.from.the.recent.date.of.the.implementation.of.the.mergers,.there.is.much.overall.confusion.about.the.actual.nature.of.the.goals.set.by.the.Danish.political.system..“Impact.of.university.research”.is.not.op-erationalised.clearly,.implying.that.the.Panel.is.not.sure.what.is.expected.of.the.Danish.universities..What.is.e.g..meant.by.world.class?.Does.it.mean.that.one.Danish.university.should.be.among.the.10.best.in.the.world,.among.the.20.best?.Or.should.all.Danish.uni-versities.become.world.leaders.in.at.least.one.disciplinary.area?.What.are.the.indicators.to.be.used?.The.use.of.global.university.rankings.is,.for.example,.connected.with.severe.problems,.as.they.are.heavily.criticised.for.methodological.inconsistencies..In.addition,.the.starting.point.for.the.evaluation.is.not.a.university.sector.in.crisis..The.research.perform-ance.of.Danish.universities.was.in.2007.in.many.respects.good.to.excellent,.and.there.are.no.indications.that.it.is.deteriorating...Data.on.research.performance.show.that.Denmark.is.among.the.most.productive.countries.in.the.world..When.it.comes.to.the.number.of.scientific.articles.per.inhabitant.(see.table.1).only.Switzerland.and.Sweden.are.performing.better.than.Denmark,.and.the.productiv-ity.of.Switzerland.is.clearly.influenced.by.the.high.output.of.CERN.staff..Also.the.growth.of.the.productivity.of.the.Danish.universities.is.satisfying,.and.concerning.the.research.impact.Denmark.is.among.the.best.performing.countries.in.the.world,.with.Switzerland.being.the.only.country.performing.better.than.Denmark.(table.2)..
46
5. The mergers
These.data.concern.the.research.productivity.and.impact.of.Denmark.as.a.country..Discipline-specific.data1.concerning.the.publication.profile.of.Danish.researchers.and.the.number.of.citations.per.article.show.a.diverse.picture.with.Danish.research.belonging.to.the.world.frontier.in.certain.fields.and.performing.less.than.average.in.others..Nonethe-less,.the.overall.productivity.and.impact.of.Danish.research.is.impressive..Table 1: scientific publication in 2006/08 in selected countriescountrynumber ofarticles 2006% of world productionnr of articlesper 1000inhabitantsaverage annualchange in nr ofarticles 02-06(06/08) in %3,83,43,00,819,93,17,25,47,16,310,15,46,22,7 (2,1)4,1 (4,6)3,63,4 (3,9)7,9 (9,2)
2006UsaUkgermanyJapanchinafrancecanadaitalyspainaustraliaindianetherlandsswitzerlandswedendenmarkaustriafinlandnorway293 25477 05672 23671 14369 66451 59144 11939 52230 78527 51525 67223 41716 94716 5728 8668 3578 3216 75125,86,86,46,36,14,53,93,52,72,42,32,11,51,50,80,70,70,6
200824.36,56,15,87,34,43,73,52,82,42,42,01,51,40,80,70,70,60,991,280,880,560,050,831,370,680,711,350,021,442,261,841,641,021,591,46
source: national science indicators /Thomson scientific/nifU sTep
Table 2: relative citation index for selected countries, total numbers for five-year period 2002-2006 (world average = 100)countryswitzerlandUsadenmarkThe netherlandsUkswedenbelgiumfinlandgermanynorwayaustriacanadaindex145135135132125123122120119118117116world averageoecd averageeU average100109106countryfranceaustraliaitalyspainJapanchinabrazilindiaindex11010810710191736760
note: based on publications in the period 2002-2006 and citations of these publications in the same period. index for each country is weighed on the basis ofthe country’s relative field distribution of articles.source: national science indicators/Thomson scientific/nifU sTep
1
.See:.Forskningsbarometer.2009.–.Dansk.forskning.i.internationalt.perspektiv..København:.Ministeriet.for.Viden-skab,.Teknologi.og.Udvikling;.section.2.4.publikationer.og.citationer;.figures.2.20,.2.21.and.2.22..
47
5. The mergers
Concerning.the.rankings.of.Danish.universities.a.distinction.has.to.be.made.between.aca-demic.and.commercial.rankings..The.academic.rankings.attempt.to.use.academic.indica-tors.in.a.consistent.way..Here.one.can.in.general.see.a.rather.stable.list.of.universities.(or.university.programmes).from.year.to.year,.but.a.general.criticism.towards.these.rankings.concerns.their.methodology,.e.g..the.weight.of.specific.indicators..An.example.of.an.aca-demic.ranking.is.the.Shanghai.Jiao.Tong.University.ranking.of.the.top.500.research.univer-sities.in.the.world..Commercial.rankings.are.in.general.published.by.magazines.and.have.a.tendency.to.change.the.criteria.regularly,.leading.to.large.shifts.up.and.down.the.list.of.the.selected.universities..An.example.of.this.kind.of.ranking.is.the.Times.Higher.Educa-tion.ranking..Several.commercial.rankings.of.universities.are.national.only.Here,.we.refer.to.the.academic.rankings..In.general.the.four.largest.Danish.universities.(KU,.AU,.DTU.and.SDU).are.ranked.among.the.best.research.universities.in.the.world.when.it.comes.to.institutional.rankings,.such.as.the.Shanghai.Jiao.Tong.ranking..We.find.it.a.striking.feature.that.KU.and.AU.are.among.the.few.universities.that.have.improved.their.position.considerably.in.the.Shanghai.ranking.over.the.last.years,.which.could.be.a.result.of.the.mergers..According.to.the.disciplinary.ranking.produced.by.the.German.Cen-trum für Hochschulentwicklung.(CHE)2,.which.identifies.the.very.best.European.graduate.programmes.in.a.number.of.fields3,.KU.belongs.in.five.of.the.seven.included.disciplines.to.the.very.best.universities.in.Europe,.while.AU.belongs.in.one.discipline.to.the.Europe.sci-entific.top..The.other.Danish.universities.are.not.included.in.the.main.academic.rankings..The.diversity.in.research.performance.per.discipline.and.university.is.confirmed.by.data.presented.in.the.latest.Forskningsbarometer.2009.Furthermore,.Danish.universities.are.performing.well.to.very.well.compared.to.other.OECD.countries.when.it.comes.to.attracting.international.research.funds.from.other.sourc-es.than.the.EU..This.goes.for.funding.from.other.research.councils,.such.as.the.NIH.and.NSF.in.the.USA,.as.for.funding.from.foundations.and.other.non-profit.organisations.4.
Policy issue: University profiles emerging?The.Panel.finds.that,.by.and.large.the.Danish.universities.have.explicit.research.strategies,.but.with.different.ambition.levels.showing.clearly.that.not.all.universities.aim.at.perform-ing.as.world.class.research.universities.in.all.areas..This.is.one.of.the.aspects.that.should.be.included.in.a.further.development.of.the.system.diversity.in.Danish.higher.education..One.diversity.aspect.seems.to.be.given,.i.e..the.strict.separation.of.the.roles.of.universities.and.university.colleges.(professionshøjskoler),.with.the.latter.not.being.expected.to.do.basic.research.or.offer.research-based.master.and.PhD.programmes..However,.as.indicated.such.a.binary.divide.does.not.imply.that.all.universities.can.be.expected.to.have.identical.research.missions.and.perform.at.the.same.level..As.we.have.implied.above,.the.political.intention.to.further.improve.the.research.impact.of.Danish.universities.has.been.driven.neither.by.a.crisis.nor.by.perceived.problems.re-lated.to.the.current.quantity.and.quality.of.the.research.performance.of.Danish.universi-ties..The.Danish.universities’.research.performance.is.in.many.respects.impressive..Also.the.public.financing.of.academic.research.has.been.increased.quite.strongly.as.part.of.the.
.See:.http://www.che.de/downloads/CHE_AP124_ExcellenceRanking_2009.pdf.Encompassing.biology,.chemistry,.economics,.mathematics,.physics,.political.science.and.psychology4.See:.Forskningsbarometer.2009.–.Dansk.forskning.i.internationalt.perspektiv..København:.Ministeriet.for.Viden-skab,.Teknologi.og.Udvikling;.section.1.2.international.konkurrence.om.forskningsmidler,.pp..20-28.23
48
5. The mergers
implementation.of.the.Danish.Globalisation.Strategy..The.government.obviously.intends.to.stick.at.least.for.the.coming.three.years.to.its.intentions.to.invest.public.funds.at.a.level.of.around.1%.of.the.Danish.GDP.in.research,.despite.the.financial.crisis..The.report.has.noted.above.all.an.absence.of.clarity.about.the.aimed.at.research.targets.of.the.Danish.universities.and.the.university.reform.processes..This.calls.for.a.more.explicit.debate.on.the.role,.profile.and.mission.of.each.university.which.can.be.expected.to.be.beneficial.for.the.Danish.university.sector..The.reported.diversity.in.the.research.produc-tivity.and.impact.suggests.that.the.development.of.a.strategic.institutional.profile.could.be.anchored,.amongst.other.things,.in.the.disciplines,.fields.and.areas.where.the.university.in.question.is.performing.better.than.world.average..The.mergers.offered.potentially.another.element.in.the.further.development.of.institutional.profiles.in.the.sense.that.they.allowed.for.a.concentration.of.research.staff,.facilities.and.re-sources.in.specific.disciplines,.fields.and.areas..However,.given.that.there.were.several.other.factors.influencing.the.final.outcomes.of.the.mergers,.the.resulting.institutional.profiles.were.not.as.distinct.as.might.have.been.targeted.at..Therefore,.even.though.the.mergers.have.con-tributed.to.the.further.development.of.university.profiles,.the.Panel.can.identify.two.impor-tant.policy.issues,.which.are.unclear.to.us,.and.which.we.feel.need.to.be.debated:.First:.Have.the.reforms,.and.especially.the.merger.processes,.led.to.the.development.of.the.institutional.research.strategies,.performance.and.innovations.that.were.expected?.In.other.words,.what.were.the.expected.features.of.the.strategic.institutional.profiles,.and.is.the.new.Danish.university.landscape.moving.in.that.direction?.Second:.What.kind.of.university.system.diversity.is.preferred?.For.example,.should.the.system.move.into.the.direction.of.a.‘University.of.Denmark’.system,.with.agreed.profiles.and.roles.for.each.university?.Or.is.a.more.open.competition.(nationally.and.internation-ally).preferable.in.which.the.universities’.profiles.and.roles.are.less.the.result.of.mutual.agreements,.and.more.of.institutional.decisions.on.investments,.academic.staff.quality,.and.research.and.teaching.facilities?
5.2.2
attracting eU fundingObservationsOne.of.the.main.expectations.of.the.mergers.was.that.Danish.universities.would.become.more.successful.in.attaining.EU.research.funding..In.this.the.establishment.of.the.Euro-pean.Research.Council.(ERC).in.2007.is.an.important.benchmark.for.Danish.universities,.since.the.aim.of.the.ERC.is.to.create.a.‘Champions.League’.of.European.investigator-driv-en.‘frontier’.research..In.order.to.get.an.indication.of.the.success.rate.of.Danish.universi-ties.in.applying.for.EU.funding.the.Panel.has.focused.on.the.results.of.the.seventh.Frame-work.Programme.(FP7),.which.also.includes.the.ERC.FP7.started.1.January.2007.and.will.expire.in.2013..It.has.a.budget.of.over.€.50.billion,.and.it.is.as.such.the.largest.publicly.funded.research.programme.ever.established5.
5
.FP7.is.organised.in.four.programmes,.called.Cooperation,.Ideas,.People.and.Capacities..The.Cooperation.programme.supports.international.collaborative.projects.and.networks.in.ten.areas,.i.e..health;.knowledge.based.bio-economy.(KBBE:.food,.agriculture,.and.fisheries,.and.biotechnology);.information.and.communication.technologies.(ICT);.nanosciences,.nanotechnologies,.materials.&.new.production.technologies.(NMP);.energy;.environment.(incl..climate.change);.transport.(incl..aeronautics);.socio-economic.sciences.and.the.humanities;.space;.and.security..It.has.a.budget.of.over.€.32.billion,.implying.that.it.represents.nearly.2/3.of.the.overall.FP7.
49
5. The mergers
A.first.examination.of.the.results.of.Danish.applicants.in.the.first.period.(around.2.5.years).of.FP7.shows.that.the.overall.level.of.Danish.participation.in.FP7.is.high.for.the.Cooperation.programme.and.the.infrastructure.part.of.the.Capacities.programme,.and.relatively.low.for.the.remainder.of.the.Capacities.programme.and.the.entire.People.programme,.especially.when.it.comes.to.the.coordination.of.Marie.Curie.Initial.Training.Networks..Nonetheless,.overall.the.level.of.Danish.participation.in.these.three.FP7.programmes.implies.that.Danish.researchers.receive.more.funding.from.these.three.FP7.programmes.than.the.level.of.the.net.return.rate.for.Denmark..This.implies.that.Denmark.‘receives.more.funding.from.FP7.than.it.invests.’.However,.despite.the.high.overall.participation.rate.in.the.Cooperation.programme.and.the.research.infrastructure.part.of.the.Capacities.programme.in.FP7,.the.general.picture.is.that.Danish.universities.like.to.participate.in.projects.but.not.to.coordinate.them..This.can.be.illustrated.by.the.following.figures:.while.around.17.%.of.all.projects.in.the.FP7.Coopera-tion.programme.have.one.or.more.Danish.partner,.only.around.1.%.of.all.FP7.Cooperation.projects.is.coordinated.by.a.Danish.university..This.raises.some.questions.among.the.Panel..Given.the.high.productivity.and.quality.of.Danish.university.research.one.might.have.expected.a.somewhat.different.balance.be-tween.participation.and.coordination..In.a.number.of.areas.Danish.universities.are.at.the.global.research.forefront,.and.the.merger-related.aim.to.increase.the.success.of.Danish.universities.in.EU.research.funding.can.be.regarded.as.an.expression.of.the.connection.made.in.the.research.policy.arena.between.research.quality.and.EU.research.funding6..This.is.based.on.the.assumption.that.the.competition.for.EU.funding.is.tougher.than.for.national.competitive.research.funding,.and.the.quality.of.Danish.research.might.lead.to.the.expectation.that.Danish.universities.would.be.more.active.in.applying.as.FP7.funded.project.coordinators.than.is.currently.the.case..Why.is.it.necessary.to.point.to.the.different.performance.of.Danish.universities.in.FP7.project.coordination.compared.to.project.participation?.Is.the.high.level.of.participation.of.Danish.universities.not.satisfying.enough?.What.would.be.the.advantage.of.a.higher.number.of.projects.coordinated.by.a.Danish.university?.A.possible.answer.to.these.ques-tions.is.that.a.project.coordinator.has.more.influence.on.and.control.over.the.nature.and.focus.of.the.research.activities.undertaken.in.an.FP7.project..This.is.confirmed.by.a.recent.study.from.NIFU.STEP.that.suggests.that.the.level.of.satisfaction.with.project.outcomes,.effects.and.follow.up.action.is.significantly.higher.for.project.coordinators.in.the.Coopera-tion.programme.than.for.project.participants.
budget..The.Ideas.programme.of.FP7.is.implemented.by.the.ERC,.with.a.budget.of.around.€.7.5.billion..The.ERC.has.been.established.under.FP7.and.consists.of.an.independent.scientific.committee.and.an.executive.agency.responsible.for.its.administration..The.People.programme.is.aimed.at.making.Europe.more.attractive.for.the.world’s.best.researchers..It.includes.the.Marie.Curie.actions,.and.has.a.budget.of.over.€.4.7.billion..Finally,.the.Capacities.programme.wants.to.enhance.research.and.innovation.capacities.throughout.Europe.and.ensure.their.optimal.use..It.has.a.budget.of.almost.€.4.1.billion.and.supports,.amongst.other.things,.research.for.the.benefit.of.SMEs.and.research.infrastructure.6.In.its.most.recent.research.barometer.(Forskningsbarometer 2009 – Dansk forskning i internationalt perspektiv..København:.Ministeriet.for.Videnskab,.Teknologi.og.Udvikling,.p..19).the.Danish.Ministry.of.Science,.Technol-ogy.and.Innovation.has.presented.the.following.arguments.concerning.the.use.of.the.EU’s.FP7.as.an.indicator.for.research.quality:.”Bevillingsstatistik.fra.EU’s.7..rammeprogram.er.anvendt.som.kvalitetsindikator.i.barometeret,.fordi.konkurrence.om.forskningsmidler.generelt.antages.at.være.kvalitetsfremmende..Hertil.kommer.flere.ana-lyser,.der.identificerer.sammenhæng.mellem.forskningskvalitet.og.rammeprogramdeltagelse..En.nylig.bibliom-etrisk.analyse.af.forskere.fra.forskningsprojekter.finansieret.af.EU’s.6..Rammeprogram.har.således.påvist,.at.de.pågældende.forskere.lå.bedre,.hvad.angik.publikationer.og.citationer.end.deres.respektive.fagfæller..Den.nylige.evaluering.af.Sveriges.deltagelse.i.EU’s.rammeprogrammer.konkluderer.tilsvarende.med.henvisning.til.nationale.svenske.forskningsfinansierende.organer,.som.har.vurderet.kvaliteten.af.EU-finansierede.forskningsprojekter,.at.projekter.finansieret.via.EU’s.rammeprogrammer.generelt.er.af.høj.kvalitet.”
50
5. The mergers
During.the.visits.to.the.universities.the.Panel.heard.a.number.of.explanations.for.the.rela-tive.low.number.of.FP7.projects.and.networks.coordinated.by.Danish.universities..The.main.explanations.heard.were.first.the.overall.Danish.scepticism.against.the.EU.in.gen-eral;.second.the.ineffective.or.even.lack.of.lobbying.in.Brussels.for.inclusion.of.research.themes.(especially.in.FP/.Cooperation).of.relevance.for.Danish.researchers.and.Denmark.in.general;.third.the.reluctance.among.Danish.researchers.to.invest.in.bureaucratic.FP7.application.procedures;.fourth.the.administrative.burden.of.coordinating.an.EU.project;.and.fifth.the.relative.abundance.of.research.funding.in.Denmark..The.Panel.did.hear.some.worries.or.even.complaints.about.the.intra-university.support.structures.for.academic.staff.wanting.to.apply.for.EU.funding..The.evidence.gathered.dur-ing.the.visits.is.not.convincing.enough.to.come.to.a.final.conclusion.in.this..But.overall.the.Panel.would.like.to.recommend.the.Danish.universities.to.carefully.review.the.effectiveness.of.their.EU.funding.support.structure..Nonetheless,.the.Panel.did.not.get.the.impression.that.problems.with.the.support.structure.was.among.the.main.reasons.for.the.relative.underper-formance.of.Danish.universities.when.it.comes.to.coordinating.EU.projects.The.overall.observation.the.Panel.made.is.that.despite.the.high.level.of.participation.of.Danish.researchers.in.projects.funded.by.FP7,.with.respect.to.application.for.EU.funding.there.is.a.gap.between.the.political/ministerial.expectations.and.the.formal.universities.strategies.on.the.one.hand.and.the.experiences,.capacities,.actions.and.perceptions.of.aca-demic.university.staff.on.the.other.hand..In.this.the.Panel.recommends.the.university.leadership.to.assess.the.appropriateness.of.their.research.strategy.when.it.comes.to.attracting.EU.funding..An.active.research.strategy.implies.a.proactive.and.not.a.reactive.approach..As.a.consequence,.it.could.be.argued.that.part.of.the.process.of.attracting.EU.funding.should.be.a.top.down.process.through.the.identification.of.institutional.top.researchers,.followed.by.stimulating.and.supporting.them.in.their.application.for.EU.funding,.instead.of.a.bottom.up.process.in.which.researchers.are.expected.to.ask.their.administration.for.support.before.action.is.undertaken...ERC – the Ideas FP7 programmeThe.fourth.FP7.programme,.‘Ideas’,.is.implemented.by.the.ERC..The.objective.of.the.spe-cific.programme.‘Ideas’.is.to.reinforce.excellence,.dynamism.and.creativity.in.European.research.and.improve.the.attractiveness.of.Europe.for.the.best.researchers.from.both.European.and.third.countries,.as.well.as.for.industrial.research.investment,.by.providing.a.Europe-wide.competitive.funding.structure,.in.addition.to.and.not.replacing.national.funding,.for.‘frontier.research’.executed.by.individual.teams..Contrary.to.the.‘Cooperation’.programme,.the.ERC.is.aimed.at.funding.individual.researchers.and.their.project.teams,.instead.of.collaborative.trans-national.projects.or.networks..In.this.the.ERC.awards.grants.to.two.types.of.researchers,.i.e..Starting.and.Advanced.researchers..In.addition,.in.the.ERC.selection.procedure.scientific.excellence.is.the.sole.evaluation.criterion..The.ERC.was.established.in.2007..Until.now.the.results.of.two.rounds.for.awarding.Start-ing.researcher.grants.(in.2007.and.2009).and.one.for.awarding.Advanced.researcher.grants.(in.2008).have.been.published..In.the.first.rounds.of.both.the.Starting.and.the.Advanced.grants.four.grants.were.awarded.to.researchers.employed.by.Danish.universities,.leading.to.a.total.of.eight.grants.(out.of.a.total.of.573.≈.1.4.%).awarded.to.researchers.at.two.Dan-ish.universities,.i.e..AU.(5.grants),.and.KU.(3.grants)..This.result.can.be.regarded.as.rather.disappointing,.also.in.comparison.to.the.performance.of.other.‘small’.countries,.such.as.Switzerland.(43.grants),.Sweden.(29.grants).and.Finland.(15.grants)..51
5. The mergers
Given.the.ERC.aims,.the.straightforward.application.procedure,.which.is.much.less.bu-reaucratic.than.the.application.procedure.for.the.other.FP7.programmes,.and.the.limited.requirements.for.administrating.the.ERC.grants,.some.of.the.main.arguments.put.forward.for.explaining.the.relative.underperformance.of.Danish.universities.in.the.coordination.of.FP7.projects.in.the.other.three.FP7.programmes,.do.not.apply.to.the.relative.lack.of.suc-cess.of.Danish.researchers.in.the.first.two.ERC.rounds..An.additional.argument.heard.dur-ing.the.university.visits,.i.e..that.Danish.researchers.are.not.motivated.to.apply.because.of.the.overall.low.success.rates.of.applicants..In.our.view.this.argument.is.not.valid,.espe-cially.given.the.high.quality.of.Danish.university.research.The.second.round.for.awarding.Starting.researcher.grants.(in.2009).shows.a.somewhat.different.picture..In.this.round.among.the.selected.applicants.7.researchers.are.working.at.Danish.universities.(out.of.a.total.of.237.selected.applicants.=.around.3.%,.implying.a.doubling.compared.to.the.first.two.rounds)..The.selected.researchers.are.working.at.KU.(3),.DTU.(1),.and.AU.(1)..In.addition,.a.researcher.employed.at.Statens.Serum.Institute.and.a.researcher.working.at.a.specialised.hospital,.but.also.employed.at.AU,.have.been.selected..An.additional.positive.aspect.is.that.Danish.researchers.have.been.selected.in.all.three.disciplinary.areas.of.the.Starting.grant.programme,.i.e..Life.sciences;.Physical.sci-ences.and.engineering;.and.Social.sciences.and.humanities..In.this.round.Swedish.and.Finnish.researchers.performed.less.well,.with.5.Swedish.and.6.Finnish.researchers.being.selected.
Policy issue: Stimulate EU funded researchThere.is.a.gap.between,.on.the.one.side.political.and.university.leadership’s.expectations.with.respect.to.the.role.and.importance.of.EU.research.funding,.and.on.the.other.side.the.perceptions.and.experiences.of.researchers..One.of.the.consequences.is.that.Danish.re-searchers.give.the.impression.(also.being.confirmed.by.FP7.results).of.not.being.as.active.in.taking.leadership.roles.in.the.EU.research.community.through.coordination.of.projects.and.networks.as.could.be.expected.on.the.basis.of.the.quality.of.their.research.output..The.underlying.reasons.for.and.consequences.of.this.gap.should.be.addressed.in.an.open.and.transparent.way..The.Government,.the.Danish.research.councils.as.well.as.the.univer-sity.leadership.need.to.clarify.and.explain.their.arguments.for.putting.so.much.emphasis.on.EU.funding..In.addition,.the.way.in.which.Danish.research.interests.are.promoted.in.Brussels.needs.to.be.carefully.evaluated..There.are.clear.indications.that.these.research.interests.are.serious-ly.underrepresented.in.the.EU’s.decision.making.with.respect.to.the.EU’s.research.strate-gies.and.thematic.focus.areas,.especially.in.the.FP7.Cooperation.programme..
R
recommendations: stimulate participation in eU funded research>. More.explicit.national.and.institutional.targets.with.respect.to.EU.research.funding.should.be.developed..>. The.institutional.leadership.should.more.proactively.stimulate.the.processes.of.aca-demic.university.staff.applying.for.EU.research.funding,.including.more.university-internal.administrative.support.to.application.and.project.coordination.tasks.>. Institutional.and.national.strategies.should.be.established.for.promoting.the.ERC.as.a.new,.non-bureaucratic.basic.research.council.to.Danish.researchers..In.the.formulation.of.these.strategies.successful.Danish.applicants.of.ERC.grants.should.be.involved.
52
5. The mergers
5.3 educationIn.this.section,.the.Panel.will.refer.to.the.goals.of.the.mergers.related.to.education..One.of.the.goals.of.the.mergers.was.to.make.additional.research.resources.available.for.edu-cational.processes,.leading.to.a.strengthening.of.the.link.between.higher.education.and.research..Another.expectation.was.that.the.mergers.would.lead.to.more.interdisciplinary.cooperation.in.education.and.more.flexible.and.relevant.degree.programmes..In.addition,.important.policy.goals.to.strengthen.education.were.introduced.in.connection.with.the.globalisation.strategy..The.Panel.will.therefore.also.refer.to.some.of.these.goals.in.this.section,.including.the.following.goals:.to.double.the.number.of.PhD.students,.to.increase.higher.education.participation.from.45.to.50.%.of.the.age.group,.to.stimulate.faster.study.completion.of.higher.education.students.and.to.introduce.better.and.more.structured.op-tions.for.Danish.students.for.studying.abroad.As.noted.earlier,.it.is.too.early.after.the.merger.process.to.assess.definitive.effects.on.education..The.Panel’s.observations.and.assessments.in.this.section.are.based.on.several.sources.–.university.statements;.available.data;.and.Panel’s.meetings.with.stakeholders.–.keeping.in.mind.that.the.effects.of.mergers.are.intertwined.with.those.of.other.policy.reforms.introduced.over.the.last.few.years,.as.indicated.in.the.first.paragraph..Three.areas.are.examined:.study.programmes,.student.intakes.and.study.progression,.and.conditions.of.study...A.sense.of.momentum.is.clearly.evident..New.study.programmes.and.subject.offerings.are.in.place.or.being.developed,.and.there.is.evidence.that.the.universities.have.strengthened.their.capacity.to.offer.research-based.education.and.career-relevant.study.programmes.that.fit.Denmark’s.needs.for.highly.skilled.labour...
5.3.1
study programmesNew offeringsNew.study.programmes.and.new.subject.offerings.have.been.introduced.by.the.Danish.universities.over.the.last.few.years.[A9]..The.university.leaders.with.whom.we.met.typi-cally.offered.a.strategic.explanation.for.their.choices.of.new.programmes,.aware.of.their.overall.strengths.and.how.their.programmes.are.attractive.to.students.and.to.the.labour.market.The.Panel.also.was.told.about.new.offerings.that.were.directly.linked.to.the.mergers..New.programmes,.for.example,.have.been.designed.around.student.projects.in.laboratories.of.the.previous.GRIs..New.subject.areas.have.been.established.that.combine.the.strengths.of.two.merged.units.to.offer.study.programmes.responsive.to.emerging.research.areas.or.employer.needs..Some.academic.staff.noted.that.merger.conversations.resulted.in.new.col-laborations.on.study.programmes.among.two.universities.even.if.a.merger.did.not.occur..Some.academics,.especially.at.non-merged.universities,.reported.that.the.merger.process.had.hindered.their.previous.partnerships.with.GRIs.that.were.merged..Others.noted.that.their.departments.and.programmes.had.not.yet.been.affected..University.statements.and.our.visits.also.offered.examples.of.interdisciplinary.pro-grammes.resulting.from.the.mergers.among.universities.or.with.former.GRIs..On.the.whole,.such.developments.still.have.limited.scope,.and.are.found.in.some.universities.more.than.in.others..Most.universities.have.working.groups.that.are.developing.such.programmes,.and.universities.offered.examples.of.new.combinations.of.subjects.that.they.are.considering..53
5. The mergers
Researchers.from.the.merged.GRIs.have.become.involved.in.teaching.of.both.master’s.and.bachelor’s.students.and.in.supervision.of.PhD.students,.typically.with.specific.assistance.and.support.offered.by.the.university’s.departments..In.several.universities.both.master’s.and.PhD.students.have.more.access.to.sophisticated.research.laboratories..The.relevance.of.study.programmes.–.generally.judged.by.their.fit.with.the.needs.of.future.employers.–.is.given.direct.attention.by.all.universities.when.they.review.existing.pro-grammes.or.design.new.programmes..“Market”.or.“user”.needs.appear.to.have.become.a.routine.part.of.university.deliberations.about.new.programmes..A.number.of.mechanisms.support.this.perspective..Regular.surveys.of.employers’.views.and.of.recent.graduates.of-fer.universities.up-to-date.information.on.labour.market.needs.and.whether.graduates.have.the.skills.they.need...External.members.of.the.Board.offer.valuable.perspective,.as.do.members.of.advisory.councils.or.participants.in.partnerships.and.other.collaborations.with.business,.industry,.local.communities.or.practitioner.groups..For.many.universities,.still.further.opportunities.for.closer.links.with.industry.and.with.practitioners.have.been.made.possible.by.the.mergers.with.the.GRIs.It.appears.that.the.universities.have.smoothly.completed.the.transformation.to.Bologna.study.structures..Students.report,.for.example,.a.clear.understanding.of.the.bachelor’s.to.master’s.progression,.speak.readily.about.the.ECTS.system,.appreciate.the.flexibility.of.course.choices.that.are.available,.especially.in.master’s.programmes,.and.are.fully.aware.of.credit.transfer.options.and.procedures...Several.universities.noted.that.they.have.worked.hard.to.establish.an.internal.education.market..This.often.involved.holding.multi-ple.meetings.to.communicate.the.changes.to.students.
Internationalisation of educationInternational.study.is.of.interest.to.students,.and.available.data.suggest.that.a.good.number.of.Danish.students.are.studying.in.other.countries..The.data.also.show.some.increase.in.the.number.of.students.coming.to.Danish.universities.from.other.countries..Danish.stu-dents.we.met.with.were.quite.aware.of.international.exchange.opportunities,.were.open.to.such.study.when.it.meshed.with.their.educational.goals,.and.thought.clearly.about.how.such.study.could.augment.their.Danish.coursework..As.is.true.in.other.countries,.it.remains.difficult.for.students.to.coordinate.the.time.they.can.study.in.EU.or.other.settings.with.their.own.programme.requirements,.especially.in.bachelor’s.programmes..This.is.an.EU-wide.problem,.as.there.is.limited.overlap.in.term.of.calendars.among.countries.International.exchange.of.academic.staff.also.takes.place.in.both.directions..Universities.frequently.reported.problems.in.trying.to.offer.attractive.salaries.to.incoming.academics,.however..Students.expressed.no.concerns.about.having.instruction.by.academics.from.other.countries..They.noted.that.master’s.level.courses.are.taught.in.English.but.had.no.complaints..As.addressed.in.our.assessments.regarding.autonomy.(section.4.1),.Danish.regulations.limit.the.international.marketing.of.Danish.study.programmes,.the.establishment.of.joint.degrees,.and.Danish.universities’.participation.in.the.Erasmus.Mundus.programme..Nevertheless,.figures.from.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.concerning.bachelor’s.and.master’s.level.students.show.that.the.number.of.foreign.exchange.students.enrolled.in.Danish.universities.has.increased.consistently.over.the.period.2001-2007,.from.almost.3,000.to.a.little.over.5,000..The.number.of.Danish.exchange.students.spending.54
5. The mergers
study.time.at.a.foreign.higher.education.institution.has.only.increased.moderately.over.the.same.period,.from.3,342.to.3,678..
PhD EducationConditions.for.PhD.study.appear.to.have.been.strengthened.during.the.latest.years..Sever-al.universities.have.established.new.PhD.schools..The.Panel.notes.that.the.2007.change.of.the.University.Act.stipulated.establishment.of.further.PhD.schools,.and.this.development.may.therefore.well.be.caused.by.the.2007.change.of.the.University.Act.rather.than.being.a.direct.consequence.of.the.mergers..Data.from.the.Ministry.also.point.to.increased.PhD.in-take.over.the.last.several.years..The.total.number.of.new.PhD.students.in.2007.was.about.1,800.and.was.2,423.in.2009,.a.significant.increase.compared.to.2005.(1,352)..Funding.of.PhD.fellowships.remains.vitally.important..Several.academics.noted.that.funding.has.led.to.greater.growth.in.“wet”.fields7.than.in.“dry”.fields..The.Government’s.announced.goal.of.doubling.the.number.of.PhD.fellowships.by.2010.seems.to.be.much.needed,.and.may.not.be.enough..Academic.staff.in.many.locations.reported.that.they.could.accept.and.su-pervise.more.PhD.students.An.important.indicator.for.measuring.the.international.attractiveness.of.the.Danish.uni-versities.is.the.number.of.their.foreign.PhD.students..Data.from.the.Ministry8.show.that.the.number.has.increased.by.almost.150.%.in.the.period.2000.–.2008..
Table 3: international full time phd students in denmark 2000-20082000humanitiesnatural sciencesocial sciencehealth scienceTechnical scienceTotal1677222710524720011687272012827820021287302312627820031791323013630620042110229421423362005201062742140335200621109254313933720071714331471814192008232085258275616
source: dUpa’s calculations on the basis of information from statistics denmark
R
recommendation: stimulate development of new study programmes>.Consider.funding.a.one-time.scheme.for.the.development.and.early.evaluation.of.new.study.programmes..In.general,.Danish.universities.are.at.an.early.stage.in.exploiting.the.opportunities.created.by.the.mergers,.and.further.development.of.new.study.pro-grammes.can.be.expected...It.should.be.recognized.that.good.planning.takes.time.and.resources..Interdisciplinary.programmes.have.special.problems.of.integration.and.co-herence,.and.may.need.“piloting”.and.revision..In.many.countries,.universities.expect.academic.staff.to.simply.add.such.planning.duties.to.their.other.assignments..However,.some.allocate.separate.funds.for.summer.stipends.or.short-term.“release”.time.from.teaching.duties.to.allow.for.planning..The.combined.effects.of.the.Danish.taximeter.system.and.research.funding.may.make.it.especially.difficult.to.fund.such.planning.adequately.in.certain.fields..While.this.could.be.construed.as.a.problem.for.university.
78
.”Wet”.fields.are.Natural,.Technical.and.Health.Sciences,.whereas.”dry”.fields.are.humanities.and.social.sciences...See:.http://www.ubst.dk/uddannelse-og-forskning/uddannelsesstatistik/ph-d-uddannelsen
55
5. The mergers
leaders.to.solve,.the.Panel.believes.that.it.would.be.useful.for.the.political.system.to.consider.a.one-time.funding.scheme.aimed.at.“speeding.up”.desired.improvements.of.study.programmes.and.serve.Denmark.well.as.an.investment.in.greater.variety.and.stronger.quality.in.new.study.programmes.
5.3.2
student intake, progress and completionAvailable.data.and.university.reports.all.document.increasing.enrolment.in.Danish.univer-sities.at.each.level,(except.for.a.drop.in.2008.which.reportedly.was.due.to.new.demands.for.admission.and.a.favourable.situation.on.the.labour.market)..The.two-year.master’s.programmes.have.seen.significant.enrolment.growth..This.appears.to.be.a.good.devel-opment,.with.no.reports.of.overcrowding.or.disarray.with.growth..Universities.reported.plans.for.increased.enrolment.that.reflect.strategy.choices.and.new.recruitment.initiatives..The.upward.trend.fits.with.political.goals,.but.cannot.be.narrowly.termed.a.“merger.ef-fect.”.Other.factors.–.including.economic.uncertainties.affecting.employers.and.increased.numbers.in.the.youth.age.group.–.may.have.played.a.role...The.Panel.obtained.limited.information.with.respect.to.the.overall.political.goal.of.increas-ing.the.higher.education.graduation.rate.of.the.age.group.to.50.%.by.2015..Data.from.the.Ministry.indicated.that,.in.2006,.45.%.of.a.youth.group.completed.a.higher.education.pro-gramme,.suggesting.that.the.50.%.goal.is.achievable..International.experience.is.that.gains.are.made.slowly.but.cannot.be.assumed.to.occur.On-time.study.completion.is.currently.an.important.priority.in.Denmark.and.other.coun-tries..The.Danish.government.has.set.financial.incentives.to.promote.greater.efficiency.in.this.area..Data.from.Statistics.Denmark.and.the.Ministry.show.positive.trends.on.two.indicators:.steadily.improving.rates.of.on-time.plus.one.year.completion.and.some.decline.in.the.average.time.spent.on.study.through.the.master’s.level..Such.data.always.have.a.time.lag,.however,.as.the.information.for.1999.through.2007.actually.involves.students.who.began.university.study.in.2003.or.earlier...EU.data.we.received.for.average.age.of.completion.were.for.an.earlier.year,.2005..Since.the.time.reflected.in.such.data,.Danish.universities.have.experienced.a.transitional.period,.as.mergers.were.put.into.ef-fect,.as.the.Bologna.structures.were.established,.and.as.students.experienced.greater.op-portunities.for.transfer..On.these.policy.areas.–.promoting.increased.enrolment,.a.higher.percentage.of.youth.com-pleting.tertiary.education,.and.on-time.study.completion.–.available.data.provide.a.limited.perspective.on.any.effects.of.the.mergers..However,.the.general.trend.is.favourable.and.Danish.universities.report.a.range.of.initiatives.that.offer.a.basis.for.expecting.progress..In.most.countries,.slow.progress.is.most.realistic.to.expect,.given.the.many.factors.that.af-fect.overall.completion..Most.countries.also.experience.differences.between.subject.areas.in.average.completion.times,.but.factors.vary.and.are.best.addressed.within.universities.rather.than.by.governmental.or.Parliamentary.actions..The.Panel.has.heard.of.examples.that.the.change.of..taximeter.financing.for.shortening.completion.times.has.made.the.uni-versities.introduce.rules.aiming.at.increasing.completion.time,.including.stricter.rules.of.completion.of.Master’s.theses.On-time.study.completion.also.might.be.enhanced.by.allowing.greater.flexibility.for.stu-dents.who.change.study.programmes..The.“lost”.time.reported.by.such.students.may.be.educationally.sound,.rather.than.a.problem,.as.some.“catch-up”.work.should.be.expected.when.they.enter.a.new.study.field..Nonetheless,.universities.might.review.their.transfer.
56
5. The mergers
rules.to.ensure.a.fair.evaluation.of.how.courses.taken.at.other.institutions.fit.with.a.stu-dent’s.new.study.programme..
R
recommendations: increased efforts for higher enrolment>. Each.university.should.prepare.an.enrolment.strategy.in.view.of.the.stated.goal.for.the.whole.tertiary.sector..>. Sector-wide.goals.require.co-ordination.across.the.Ministries.of.Education.and.of.Sci-ence,.Technology.and.Innovation..Denmark.should.examine.how.its.universities,.uni-versity.colleges.and.other.tertiary.institutions.share.the.role.of.increasing.access.and.wider.participation..>. Increased.coordination.between.universities.and.university.colleges.would.be.needed.to.improve.participation.rates.
5.3.3
conditions of studyThe.Panel’s.meetings.with.students.focused.in.part.on.their.experiences.with.study.pro-grammes.and.possible.effects.of.the.mergers..Overall,.students.reported.few.negative.ef-fects.of.the.merger.on.education,.often.cited.positive.results,.and.expressed.satisfaction,.both.for.themselves.and.for.other.students..However,.the.Panel.has.not.found.clear.evi-dence.of.particular.effects.of.the.mergers.on.the.conditions.of.study..Most.students.displayed.a.strong.sense.of.ownership.in.their.universities.and.their.educa-tion..A.pedagogical.focus.on.project.work,.both.individual.and.in.groups,.was.strongly.valued.Student.representatives.reported.that.their.universities.offer.ample.sources.of.careers.guid-ance..Representatives.also.reported.that.students.are.generally.aware.of.a.range.of.univer-sity.services.and.use.them.when.they.want.such.assistance..The.universities.offer.careers.counselling,.seminars,.job.fairs.for.different.study.areas,.and.information.on.their.websites.regarding.job.opportunities..Some.universities.offer.careers.guidance.in.the.early.years.of.university.study,.as.well.as.for.those.nearing.study.completion....Students.readily.referred.to.study.boards,.organised.for.each.department.or.study.pro-gramme,.as.a.way.to.discuss.problems.with.education.programmes..However,.as.also.indicated.in.section.4.2.1.2,.students.often.objected.to.the.limited.influence.of.the.study.boards.Online.course.evaluations.are.conducted.each.term,.allowing.university.leaders.and.study.boards.to.monitor.and.correct.problems.that.arise..Students.understand.the.ECTS.system.of.credits,.plan.according.to.it,.and.appear.to.appreciate.the.more.flexible.course.choices.that.are.now.built.into.most.study.programmes..At.some.universities,.students.felt.that.programme.requirements.in.some.subjects.were.quite.restrictive,.making.it.difficult.to.pur-sue.related.courses.or.study.abroad..Most.student.groups.we.met.with.expressed.concern.with.the.ban.on.group.exams..Some.argued.persuasively.that.the.strong.emphasis.on.group.projects.in.Danish.universities.calls.for.a.style.of.examining.consistent.with.this.group.orientation..Some.suggested.that.the.different.styles.of.examining.lead.to.differences.in.how.students.prepare.for.exams.and.what.they.learn..57
5. The mergers
R
recommendation: deregulation of conditions of study>.Universities.themselves.should.decide.issues.related.to.conditions.of.study,.which.thus.should.not.be.subject.of.detailed.Government.regulations..For.example,.it.should.be.the.universities.themselves.who.should.decide.whether.they.want.to.practice.group.exams.or.not.
5.4 innovation and relationship to the business sectorThe.current.dominant.political.use.of.the.term.innovation.has.emerged.from.an.econom-ic.debate,.stressing.the.importance.of.product.and.process.innovation.for.growth.and.jobs.in.a.globalised.world..Universities.participate.in.this.debate.and.pursue.different.ways.how.to.link.education.and.research.to.innovation.activities.in.the.economy.and.in.society..For.some.years,.firms.have.increasingly.practiced.“open.innovation”..They.use.“external.ideas.as.well.as.internal.ideas,.and.internal.and.external.paths.to.market,.as.they.look.to.advance.their.technology”.(Chesbrough.2006)..For.example,.large.international.compa-nies,.when.locating.their.research.facilities,.search.for.sites.near.universities.so.that.they.can.best.practice.“open.innovation”..Firms.look.for.locations.with.strong.frontier.research,.with.a.general.competence.base,.with.open-mindedness,.and.with.flexibility..When.engaging.in.innovation.activities,.it.will.be.important.for.universities.not.only.to.better.exploit.existing.knowledge,.but.also.to.develop.upstream.strategies..Upstream.strategies.should.look.for.building.up.new.knowledge.in.emerging.fields.by.hiring.world.class.people.and.by.investing.in.the.appropriate.infrastructure..This.implies.institutional.strategies,.which.should.include.the.shifting.of.human.and.non-human.resources.“out.of.old.fields.and.into.new.fields”..It.also.implies.changing.curricula.in.order.to.attract.students.in.areas.where.new.jobs.are.created.and.growth.occurs..Up-stream.strategies.are.especially.needed.in.the.fields.of.pharmaceuticals,.energy,.envi-ronment,.e-health,.transport,.and.logistics,.where.there.are.and.will.be.a.strong.innova-tion.demand.(Aho-Report.2006).Innovation-oriented.collaboration.of.universities.can.be.studied,.amongst.other.things,.by.looking.at.research-financing.by.private.sources.(see.section.5.4.1)..The.integration.of.GRIs.into.universities.(see.section.5.4.2).is.supposed.to.strengthen.the.universities.in.such.a.way.that.they.can.play.a.more.important.role.in.innovation.activities,.in.private.sector.companies.as.well.as.public.sector.organisations.
5.4.1
relationship to private sector companiesThe.Danish.policy.goals.regarding.innovation.have.been.operationalised.in.an.‘Innova-tion.Action.Plan’.published.in.2007.by.the.Danish.Council.for.Technology.and.Innovation..The.main.objectives.of.the.Plan.are.to.make.all.Danish.enterprises,.including.SMEs,.more.innovative..The.action.plan.intends.to.turn.5,000.SMEs.into.innovative.enterprises.and.to.encourage.an.additional.2,000.SMEs.to.employ.workers.with.higher.educational.quali-fications..Knowledge.transfer.and.collaboration.between.research.and.private.enterprises.are.intended.to.be.strengthened..Key.targets.are.the.doubling.of.the.number.of.industrial.PhDs.to.500.a.year.and.to.establish.500.new.knowledge.transfer.projects.between.private.enterprises.and.knowledge.institutions..
58
5. The mergers
As.shown.in.table.4,.the.Danish.university.sector.receives.a.much.higher.share.of.the.public.national.R&D.expenditures.than.the.universities.in.many.comparable.countries..Only.the.Netherlands.shows.a.higher.value.for.HERD.than.Denmark..However,.the.Dan-ish.figure.of.26.1%.in.2006.is.obviously.not.including.the.results.of.the.mergers.of.2007..If.only.half.of.the.Danish.governmental.research.(GOVRD).reported.in.2006.is.included.in.HERD,.Danish.universities.would.receive.the.highest.share.of.all.countries.reported.in.the.list..Yet,.when.it.comes.to.financing.university.research.by.business.enterprises,.Danish.uni-versities.are.situated.at.the.lowest.end.of.comparable.countries..The.last.column.in.table.4.indicates.that.the.share.of.private.companies.in.financing.public.research.is,.compara-tively.speaking,.very.low,.only.2.3.%.Table 4: private and public shares of research financing for selected countriesr&d shareof gdpdenmarkswedenfinlandgermanyUkUsanetherlandsswitzerland2.43%3.73%3.37%2.53%1.78%2.61%1.67%2.90%businessresearch as shareof total r&d66,6%74,9%71,5%69,9%61,7%70,3%57,6%73,7%Universityresearch asshare of totalr&d (herd)26.1%20.4%18.7%16.3%26.1%14.3%28.2%22.9%governmentalresearch as shareof totalr&d (gov rd)6.7%4.5 %9.7%13.8%10.0%11.1%14.1%1.1%herd+govrdfinanced bybusinessenterprise2.3%4.5%8.6%12.2%5.9%2.7%10.0%8.3%
source: european commission, science, Technology and competitiveness. key figures. report 2008/2009, brussels 2008, pp 35-37.all data refer to 2006, latest data available
The.low.share.is.confirmed.by.a.recently.published.report.of.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation9..According.to.this.report,.around.2.3.%.of.university.research.is.funded.by.private.companies..This.figure.implies.that.Danish.universities.are.ranked.at.the.27th.position.among.a.total.of.34.OECD,.EU.and.BRIC.countries.when.it.comes.to.the.proportion.of.university.research.that.is.funded.by.private.sector..Regarding.this.is-sue,.Danish.university.research.is.thus.far.away.from.those.countries.where.universities.have.the.highest.level.of.external.research.funds.from.the.private.sector..Among.the.most.research.intensive.OECD.countries,.South.Korea.and.Germany.are.ranked.highest.with.about.14.%.of.university.research.funded.by.the.private.sector..A.comparison.among.Nor-dic.countries.shows.that.Danish.universities,.with.2.3.%.of.their.research.funded.by.pri-vate.companies,.are.below.the.level.of.Sweden.and.Norway.(resp..5.%.and.4.%),.Finland.(7.%).and.Iceland.(11.%).The.quantitative.implication.of.private.financing.to.universities.is.underlined.by.the.fol-lowing.scenario:.If.Denmark.had.a.situation.comparable.to.Germany,.the.Netherlands,.Switzerland.or.Finland.(around.10.%.of.university.research.financed.by.the.private.sector,.instead.of.the.present.2.3-2.5.%),.universities.in.Denmark.could.raise.an.amount.of.up.to.100.million.per.year.from.the.private.sector.as.a.financial.contribution.to.their.research..9
.Forskningsbarometer.2009.–.Dansk.forskning.i.internationalt.perspektiv..København:.Ministeriet.for.Videnskab,.Teknologi.og.Udvikling,.pp..25,.28,
59
5. The mergers
A.first.possible.explanation.for.the.low.ratio.of.private.financing.of.Danish.university.re-search.could.be.that.Danish.university.research.is.rather.irrelevant.to.private.companies..It.may.be.too.academic.for.business.or.concentrated.in.areas.with.low.business.interest..However,.another.and.probably.more.likely.explanation,.is.the.tradition.in.Denmark.for.a.high.ratio.of.public.funding.of.university.research.combined.with.the.high.level.of.Danish.taxes..This.tradition.would.imply.that.university.research.is.regarded.to.be.the.responsibil-ity.of.the.State.and.that.publicly.financed.university.research.is.considered.to.be.a.public.good,.from.which.the.Danish.enterprises.may.benefit..The.expectation.of.high.public.financing.of.university.research.is.underlined.by.the.par-ticular.Danish.industry.structure,.which.is.dominated.by.small.and.medium.sized.enter-prises.with.only.a.few.large.companies..The.Danish.SMEs.have.less.tradition.and.much.less.means.for.financing.university.research.than.the.large.companies.Furthermore,.the.low.business.financing.percentage.only.shows.the.direct.industry.financ-ing.to.universities..It.does.not.include.the.financing.to.university.research.from.large.in-dependent.foundations.established.by.large.Danish.companies,.such.as.Carlsberg,.Novo.Nordisk,.Lundbeck,.Velux,.Rockwool,.Realdania.and.many.others.
R
recommendation: develop a strategy regarding university-industry collaborationDespite.the.various.explanations.contributing.to.the.particularly.low.Danish.percentage.of.private.financing.for.universities.compared.with.other.countries,.it.is.the.overall.impres-sion.of.the.Panel.that.the.private.financing.for.Danish.universities.is.much.lower.than.in.comparable.countries..It.is.highly.likely.that.the.low.percentage.reflects.a.much.lower.level.of.university-industry.collaboration.in.Denmark.than.in.comparable.countries..We.find.this.a.matter.of.concern.in.relation.to.the.policy.goals.of.strengthened.innovation.in.the.Danish.society.and.industry.>. The.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.together.with.the.universities.and.the.business.sector,.should.develop.a.strategy.for.how.to.intensify.the.relation.of.universities.with.the.business.sector..The.strategy.could.for.example.be.based.on.the.Danish.‘Innovation.Action.Plan’,.and.on.further.investigations.regarding.Danish.university-industry.collaboration.and.private.funding.of.university.research,.including.an.assessment.on.the.appropriate.balance.between.public.and.private.financing.of.uni-versity.research.in.the.context.of.the.Danish.system..>. The.universities.should.intensify.their.relations.with.the.business.sector.>. Danish.business.should.be.ready.to.treat.the.outcome.of.university.research.not.just.as.a.public.good..The.government.may.help.Danish.firms.by.granting.special.tax.deduc-tions..The.issue,.of.course,.is.where.to.fix.the.borderline.between.the.production.of.public.and.of.private.goods..
5.4.2
integrating the gris with universitiesA.decision.taken.in.the.framework.of.the.Danish.Globalisation.Strategy.consisted.in.inte-grating.Government.Research.Institutions.(GRIs).into.universities..The.overall.goals.were.to.create.research.synergies.that.would.strengthen.public.research,.to.fertilise.university.research.with.close.contacts.with.the.professions.and.the.public.sector,.as.well.as.to.im-
60
5. The mergers
prove.the.quality.and.relevance.of.higher.education.by.making.research.resources.avail-able.for.strengthening.the.research.basis.of.educational.activities..Our.assessments.related.to.these.goals.are.addressed.in.previous.sections..In.addition,.it.was.a.goal.to.strengthen.the.collaboration.between.universities.and.industry.in.order.to.increase.innovation.in.Danish.industry..We.have.addressed.the.industrial.innovation.and.universities’.relation.to.private.sector.in.section.5.4.1..Here,.we.focus.on.the.strengthening.of.the.universities'.contribution.to.public.innovation.and.their.relation.to.public.autorities.as.a.consequence.of.the.mergers.betweeen.universi-ties.and.GRIs..Although.no.guiding.model.or."master.plan".was.provided.by.the.govern-ment,.two.principles.guided.the.integration.of.GRIs.in.universities:.(1).the.integration.should.preferably.be.supported.by.the.boards.of.the.GRIs,.which.had.an.advisory.role.towards.the.responsible.minister.and.(2).induvidual.GRIs.should.not.be.divided.into.small.units.or.be.divided.between.different.universities.[A2].
Strengthening of education activities as well as of research at universitiesDuring.its.visits,.the.Panel.observed.that.the.goals.of.strengthening.education.as.well.as.research.at.universities.are.increasingly.met..Researchers.of.the.merged-in.GRIs.seem.to.be.satisfied.with.finding.teaching.opportunities,.and.students.appear.to.appreciate.the.ten-dency.of.further.and.broadened.study.programmes..We.heard.it.suggested,.though,.that.the.training.opportunities.in.teaching.for.the.integrated.previous.GRI-researchers.should.be.widened..Although.there.appeared.to.have.been.an.initial.scepticism.on.how.the.more.service.oriented.research.of.GRIs.would.get.along.with.the.more.scholarship.type.of.research.at.universities,.a.constructive.dialogue.between.the.two.sides.of.research.seems.to.have.been.initiated..This.constructive.dialogue.paves.the.way.for.new.research.opportunities.within.the.merged.institutions..
R
recommendations: strengthening of university profiles>. Support.the.further.development.of.appropriate.university.profiles..The.voluntary.char-acter.of.the.mergers.as.well.as.the.decision.not.to.accept.any.division.of.a.GRI.between.various.universities.raises.the.question.whether.the.mergers.have.provided.sufficient.support.for.developing.appropriate.university.profiles..From.that.perspective.it.can.be.recommended.that.the.development.in.the.long.run.of.those.mergers.where.geography.(distance).or.substantive.differences.might.lead.to.diminishing.synergies.should.be.monitored.carefully.>. The.broad.research.strength.of.the.universities.should.be.further.elaborated.for.further.strengthening.research.areas.and.profiles.of.universities..This.work.would.benefit.from.becoming.linked.with.the.considerations.recommended.in.section.5.5.2.on.integrating.still.non-merged.GRIs.into.universities..>. Secure.that.the.research.basis.for.the.government.commissioned.services.at.universi-ties.is.sustainable..The.Panel.recommends.perseverance.and.long-term.planning.for.the.research.basis.of.the.universities’.provision.of.the.government.commissioned.services,.even.if.public.calls.for.some.of.the.services.will.be.introduced..
61
5. The mergers
5.5 non-merged universities and government researchinstitutions5.5.1Three non-merged universitiesThe.Panel’s.schedule.included.visits.to.the.three.Danish.universities.that.were.not.merged:.Copenhagen.Business.School,.IT.University,.and.Roskilde.University..Each.had.considered.some.forms.of.merger.during.the.planning.process,.but.at.this.point.remain.stand-alone.universities...Each.has.a.distinctive.profile..CBS.has.a.large.student.body,.with.more.than.12,000.students.in.2007,.spread.evenly.between.bachelor’s.and.master’s.students,.and.with.168.PhD.students..It.offers.22.bachelor’s.programmes.and.27.master’s.programmes,.generally.in.business.and.related.subjects.(e.g.,.law,.economics,.communications),.and.has.an.international.profile,.including.international.accrediting.credentials,.a.large.number.of.partnerships.with.foreign.universities,.and.a.sizeable.international.student.popula-tion..ITU,.founded.in.2003,.had.a.student.body.of.about.1,000.students.in.2007,.primarily.master’s.students.but.also.including.43.PhD.students.and.46.students.admitted.to.the.first.bachelor’s.programme.at.ITU,.which.was.opened.by.2007..ITU.offers.7.master’s.pro-grammes,.including.e-Business..Roskilde.University.had.a.student.body.of.about.7,300.students.in.2007,.including.4,000.for.bachelor’s.programmes,.another.3,300.in.master’s.programmes,.and.246.PhD.students..Its.largest.programmes.are.in.the.social.sciences.and.humanities,.along.with.communication.and.related.fields.The.Danish.Government.obviously.expects.each.of.these.non-merged.universities.to.con-tribute.to.the.broad.goals.announced.as.part.of.the.merger.process,.including.strength-ened.education.and.research..The.recent.period.undoubtedly.created.some.uncertainties.for.each.of.these.universities..While.all.three.expressed.positive.views.about.their.non-merged.status,.each.faces.special.challenges.in.the.changed.university.landscape.in.Denmark..For.CBS,.the.Panel.recognises.its.ambition.to.be.a.top-level.business.school.acknowledged.across.Europe.and.globally,.and.notes.its.strong.record.in.attracting.international.students.and.in.arranging.study.abroad.opportunities.for.its.Danish.students..CBS,.in.its.written.statement,.indicated.that.in.2008.it.was.successful.with.8.out.of.19.FP7.applications,.and.that.it.has.set.further.im-provement.in.such.funding.as.a.priority...Roskilde.University.also.has.a.distinctive.profile.and.contribution.within.Denmark..It.is.well.known.for.its.interdisciplinary.research.and.education,.including.a.project-.and.prob-lem-oriented.approach.that.is.much.valued.by.its.students.and.graduates..IT.University,.the.newest.university.in.Denmark,.is.distinctive.for.its.emphasis.on.several.IT.study.fields.and.its.pedagogical.approach.that.allows.bachelor’s.degree.students.from.other.study.fields.to.begin.IT.study.at.the.master’s.level.The.Panel.notes.that.both.CBS.and.Roskilde.University.share.some.special.challenges.re-lated.to.their.current.profiles..Both.enrol.most.of.their.students.in.study.fields.that.receive.the.lowest.taximeter.rates.and.both.state.that.historically.they.have.received.lower.levels.of.public.research.funding..As.can.be.seen.in.Table.5.in.Annex.7,.CBS.still.receives.by.far.the.lowest.level.of.basic.research.funding.as.part.of.its.overall.budget..As.they.report,.they.thus.suffer.from.modest.overall.funding.on.an.ongoing.basis...Both.universities.have.plans.to.expand.and.diversify.their.other.sources.of.funding..CBS,.for.example,.has.decided.to.62
5. The mergers
build.its.tuition.fee.income.from.foreign.students.and.to.increase.its.international.research.funding...ITU,.as.a.new.institution.with.students.primarily.enrolled.in.a.higher.taximeter.tier,.does.not.share.these.challenges.but,.due.to.its.small.size,.faces.other.challenges..As.noted.in.the.Research.section.of.this.report,.ITU.has.not,.as.yet,.been.successful.in.winning.EU.research.funding.in.the.Cooperation.programme.of.FP7...This.is.all.the.more.striking.since.AAU.has.been.highly.successful.in.winning.research.funding.in.the.IT.sub-programme.of.FP7.Cooperation..In.addition,.the.ITU.has.not.established.a.record.of.strong.commerciali-sation.of.its.research.The.Panel.also.has.concern.that.ITU’s.educational.programmes.are.vulnerable,.not.only.because.the.programmes.are.small.but.also.because.the.administrative.and.academic.infrastructure.is.quite.small..With.a.limited.number.of.full.professors.and.associate.pro-fessors.at.ITU,.they.must.share.a.heavy.burden.of.serving.on.committees,.as.heads.of.studies,.as.PhD.supervisors,.or.administrators.and,.consequently,.are.less.available.for.teaching..It.is.difficult.for.small.programmes.with.relatively.few.instructors.to.provide.the.sustained.education.quality.and.coherence.that.is.needed.to.ensure.successful.comple-tion.of.studies.over.the.long.term..We.were.told.that,.for.some.study.programmes,.teach-ing.is.carried.out.largely.by.professors.affiliated.with.other.universities..The.e-Business.programme.is,.for.example,.taught.by.professors.from.the.Copenhagen.Business.School..ITU.students.regularly.take.courses.offered.by.the.University.of.Copenhagen.or.other.universities..This.raises.the.question.of.whether.the.distinctive.pedagogical.approach.and.philosophy.espoused.by.the.ITU.experiment.can.be.executed.effectively.under.the.vulner-able.situation.of.ITU..It.should.also.be.noted.that.ITU’s.initial.objective.and.distinctive.approach.can.now.be.found.in.other.universities..The.small.size.of.ITU’s.academic.staff.also.creates.vulnerability.for.PhD.education..PhD.students.need.to.have.close,.continuing.supervision.on.a.very.specific.research.area.from.a.supervisor.with.expertise.in.that.area,.yet.ITU.can.provide.only.a.limited.range.of.exper-tise.to.support.PhD.research..Because.ITU.has.relatively.few.professors,.some.with.ties.to.business.or.industry.that.might.draw.them.away,.there.is.a.further.risk.for.maintaining.the.continuity.of.supervision.needed.by.PhD.students..In.addition,.at.our.visit.in.August.some.of.the.industry.representatives.indicated.that.they.realise.the.enormous.efforts.necessary.for.attaining.the.critical.mass.needed.to.develop.ITU.into.a.sustainable.university,.and.that.they.no.longer.insist.on.a.separate.IT.university..ITU.has.apparently.not.been.able.to.develop.a.sufficiently.broad.research.platform.to.support.a.sustainable.PhD.education.structure.of.its.own.nor.been.able.to.sufficiently.satisfy.the.expectations.of.private.sector.companies.operating.in.the.IT.areas.covered.by.ITU.
R
recommendation: dialogue on the future position of iTU>. The.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.should.start.a.dialogue.with.ITU.for.determining.ITU’s.future.position.in.the.Danish.university.landscape..The.aim.of.this.dialogue.should.be.to.identify.one.or.more.possible.merger.partners.for.ITU..The.three.non-merged.universities.all.have.distinctive.institutional.profiles..The.Panel.finds,.though,.that.the.situation.of.ITU.clearly.differs.from.the.situation.of.the.other.two.non-merged.universities..The.IT.University.is.overall.too.small.and.vulnerable.to.be.able.to.operate.in.a.satisfying.way.as.a.stand-alone.university..Amongst.other.things,.the.vulnerability.of.the.PhD.education.of.ITU.is.high.and.the.institutional.basic.research.63
5. The mergers
platform.to.support.the.PhD.education,.as.well.as.the.relationship.to.industry,.is.not.sufficiently.strong..
5.5.2
The non-merged grisBackground and institutional profiles In.January.2007,.nine.public.GRIs.were.integrated.into.universities,.in.the.form.of.facul-ties,.departments.or.professional.units..The.overall.positive.experience.of.the.merged.GRIs.was.discussed.in.section.5.4.2..Here.the.focus.is.on.the.four.GRIs.which.were.not.merged:.NFA.(National.Research.Centre.for.the.Working.Environment,.under.the.Ministry.of.Em-ployment);.the.Danish.National.Centre.for.Social.Research.(SFI,.under.the.Ministry.of.Interior.and.Social.Affairs);.the.Kennedy.Centre.(under.the.Ministry.of.Health.and.Preven-tion);.and.the.Geological.Survey.of.Denmark.and.Greenland.(GEUS,.under.the.Ministry.of.Climate.and.Energy)..The.Statens.Serum.Institut.was.not.part.of.the.evaluation.on.the.grounds.that.this.GRI.holds.particular.national.responsibilities,.amongst.other.things,.for.preventing.epidemia/pandemia..Furthermore.80-90.percent.of.the.institution’s.turnover.is.generated.from.commercial.sales.of.vaccines,.serums,.etc.The.Panel.met.with.representatives.of.the.four.non-merged.GRIs.and.officials.of.the.re-sponsible.Ministries..The.four.GRIs.have.very.different.profiles.and.face.very.different.situations..The.Geological.Survey.is.the.largest.with.an.annual.turnover.of.280.million.DKK.and.over.300.full.time.staff..Its.main.tasks.are.geological.mapping,.data.collection.and.storage,.carrying.out.research.projects,.giving.advice.and.disseminating.geo-scientific.knowledge..It.supports.administrative.and.legislative.work.in.Danish.Ministries.and.the.Greenland.Home.Rule.Authority..At.the.same.time,.it.participates.in.cooperative.arrange-ments.with.the.University.of.Copenhagen.(Departments.of.Geography.and.Geology,.and.the.Geology.Museum).as.part.of.Geocenter.Denmark,.which.numbers.500.employees.and.1,000.graduate.and.PhD.students.......NFA.has.a.staff.of.154.and.had.in.2007.a.total.budget.of.approximately.105.million.DKK,.of.which.63.%.was.basic.government.grants..As.a.national.institute.for.working.environ-ment.research,.NFA.is.dedicated.to.promoting.a.safe,.healthy.and.progressive.working.environment..It.conducts.strategic.research,.especially.in.support.of.companies’.efforts.to.improve.working.environment,.and.monitors.and.coordinates.Danish.work.environment.research..There.is.teaching.and.PhD.mentoring.The.SFI.has.a.full.time.staff.of.140.(60.researchers).and.an.annual.income.of.over.115.million.DKK,.70.%.of.which.is.allocated.to.research.and.evaluation.projects..SFI’s.main.objective.is.to.supply.relevant.knowledge.for.shaping.and.evaluating.Danish.social.welfare.policies..It.pursues.these.objectives.through.two.main.arms:.SFI.Survey.collects.and.processes.data.for.use.by.researchers,.public.authorities,.private.organisations.and.enterprises..SFI.CAMPBELL.conducts.multi-disciplinary.research.on.the.impact.of.social.programmes..SFI.has.bilateral.co-operation.agreements.with.the.universities.of.Copenhagen,.Aarhus.and.Aalborg,.and.with.Universities.Denmark..11.of.SFI’s.researchers.teach.at.four.universities.and.SFI.staff.super-vises.35.MSc.students.and.are.primary.and.secondary.supervisors.to.12.PhD.students...The.Kennedy.Centre.is.a.national.research.and.advisory.centre.on.genetics,.visual.impair-ment,.and.mental.retardation..Its.staff.numbers.approximately.85.and.it.has.an.annual.income.of.70.million.DKK..This.institution.has.been.involved.in.a.special.process..The.Government.had.aimed.to.integrate.this.institution.into.Region.Copenhagen.and.associate.
64
5. The mergers
it.with.Glostrup.Hospital.and.the.Copenhagen.University.Hospital..However,.the.final.sta-tus.of.the.institution.has.not.been.decided.by.the.Government.yet.[A5,.8.June.2009]..Issues and OptionsThe.nine.GRI.mergers.raise.the.question.of.the.continued.usefulness.and.viability.of.the.still.non-merged.part.of.the.research-based.public.service.sector.in.Denmark..The.Govern-ment.should.face.the.question.whether.the.four.non-merged.GRIs.should.be.maintained.as.independent.organisations.or.be.merged.as.well,.whether.with.a.university.or.another.institution..One.consideration.is.that.where.previously.the.GRIs.formed.a.specific.sector.with.their.own.legal.foundation.and.labour.conditions,.the.remaining.GRIs.are.too.few.in.number.and.small.in.size.to.legitimately.still.be.able.to.be.regarded.as.a.separate.sector.The.background.documentation.provided.by.the.four.unmerged.institutions.and.the.in-terviews.with.their.representatives.made.a.case.for.maintaining.the.status.quo..The.argu-ments.differed.because.of.the.differing.circumstances.of.the.GRIs...GEUS.argued.that.parts.of.its.services.to.the.government.are.of.a.confidential.nature,.which.could.be.compromised.if.it.was.part.of.a.university..In.any.event,.through.participation.in.Geocenter.it.has.good.synergies.with.the.University.of.Copenhagen..The.Board.of.Gover-nors.of.NFA.recommends.the.Institute’s.continued.independence.on.the.grounds.that.it.is.fully.meeting.the.goals.of.the.Globalisation.Strategy..regarding.research-based.ministerial.preparedness,.research.quality,.and.internationalisation..It.has.good.quality.(justified.to.some.extent.on.the.basis.of.a.recent.evaluation),.benefits.from.synergies.with.universities,.and.responds.well.to.societal.demands..NFA.argues.that.the.multi-disciplinary.OSH.(occu-pational.safety.and.health).research.would.be.hard.to.maintain.within.a.university.setting..In.addition,.it.is.argued.that.OSH.needs.to.be.close.to.the.practitioners.in.the.industry.and.the.Ministry..Similar.arguments.have.been.advanced.by.the.Kennedy.Centre:.Health.care.is.not.usually.a.part.of.the.universities..The.Centre.provides.a.way.of.capturing.the.syner-gies.between.care.and.treatment.on.the.one.hand.and.research.on.the.other,.which.would.be.lost.in.a.university.setting..SFI’s.Board.argued.that.the.Centre.serves.as.a.network.that.brings.researchers.from.universities.and.research.institutions.together.in.multidisciplinary.teams,.and.that.this.pivotal.role.will.be.lost.with.a.university.merger..One.SFI.representa-tive.put.the.case.strongly:.if.SFI.is.merged.with.a.university,.it.will.need.to.be.reinvented..In.any.event,.according.to.SFI,.there.is.already.good.co-operation.with.the.university.sector..The.Panel.has.thus.heard.the.arguments.put.forward.by.the.unmerged.GRIs.for.continued.independence..In.most.cases.we.do.not.find.these.arguments.persuasive,.but.find.that.they.need.to.be.assessed.on.the.basis.of.clearly.articulated.criteria.for.decision.making.on.whether.or.not.a.merger.should.be.pursued..Several.elements.of.the.criteria.need.to.be.considered..But.first.two.general.observations:.Whether.or.not.a.specific.GRI.should.be.merged.depends.in.the.first.place.on.the.pos-sibility.of.a.good.match.with.a.university..The.Panel.does.for.example.not.find.that.the.confidentiality.argument.raised.by.GEUS.is.particularly.strong.in.justifying.its.continuous.independence..Arrangements.for.confidential.research.can.be.made.with.the.universities,.just.as.it.can.be.with.a.government.research.institution..The.most.important.elements.of.the.decision.criteria.concern.the.impact.of.a.merger.on.quality..Defined.broadly,.it.includes.the.following.elements:.contribution.to.strategic.pro-filing.of.the.merged.institutions.through.creation.of.a.critical.mass;.synergies.in.research;.contribution.to.education.and.relating.existing.teaching.and.tutoring.in.a.controlled.uni-65
5. The mergers
versity.setting;.quality.of.service.to.the.government;.and.strengthening.connections.with.industry.and.society..The.potential.impact.of.a.merger.based.on.these.criteria.may.be.illustrated.with.a.few.exam-ples..Assuming.that.there.is.a.positive.match,.a.merger.can.potentially.improve.strategic.pro-filing.of.a.university.by.strengthening.specialisation.in.a.particular.area..A.pooling.of.resourc-es.that.a.merger.can.bring.about.should.assist.in.developing.a.critical.mass.in.more.areas,.contrary.to.a.dilution.of.resources,.as.NFA.argues.would.be.the.case..In.fact,.the.independent.evaluation.of.NFA.carried.out.in.2008.recommended.a.reduced.number.of.research.priorities.(from.seven.to.four).precisely.because.of.a.lack.of.a.critical.mass.in.those.areas..With.regard.to.the.impact.on.quality.of.service.to.the.government,.a.post-merger.agreement.for.compe-tition-based.contracts.for.those.services.offers.a.means.for.improved.quality..With.regard.to.linkages.with.industry,.the.applied.nature.of.the.research.done.by.the.GRIs.can.potentially.strengthen.this.aspect.of.the.universities,.which.is.at.present.relatively.weak.in.Denmark..Similarly,.the.Panel.does.not.find.SFI’s.arguments.–.that.it.already.co-operates.with.the.uni-versities.and.that.its.critical.role.as.a.network.coordinator.would.be.lost.if.it.was.located.within.a.university.–.persuasive..On.the.contrary.we.think.that.there.can.be.significant.ben-efits.from.a.merger.with.a.university.in.developing.synergies.in.both.education.and.research.through.building.stronger.multi-disciplinary.critical.mass.and.in.being.subject.to.more.strin-gent.quality.demands..A.merger.would.be.an.appropriate.solution.to.the.two.major.obstacles.faced.by.SFI,.as.identified.by.a.2009.evaluation.of.the.institution:.a.methodological.divide.of.qualitative.and.quantitative.work,.with.insufficient.use.made.of.its.surveys;.and.a.“two-box”.divide.between.basic.research.and.evaluation.research.[Evaluation.of.SFI.2009]..
R
recommendation: reconsider integration of the non-merged gris into universities>. The.government.should.reconsider.the.position.of.the.non-merged.GRIs.as.separate.institutions.outside.the.university.sector..The.main.arguments.for.integrating.them.in.universities.are.enhanced.quality.as.regards.research,.research.based.education,.new.educational.opportunities.for.students.and.new.links.to.other.parts.of.society..The.international.position.of.Denmark.in.the.research.areas.concerned.could.also.be.im-proved.by.an.integration.of.the.non-merged.GRIs.with.universities.
5.6 food forumIn.the.framework.of.the.merger.processes.the.Danish.agriculture.and.food.industry.made.a.plea.for.the.establishment.of.one.strong.university.for.agricultural.and.food.sciences;.a.plea.that.was.not.realised..Instead,.the.agricultural.and.food.sciences.have.been.placed.in.three.universities,.and.the.Danish.Food.Forum.was.established.with.a.mandate.to.coor-dinate.between.the.agricultural.and.food.industry,.the.agricultural.sector.and.the.univer-sity.sector..From.the.beginning.the.Food.Forum.was.in.a.rather.disadvantageous.position.since.its.terms.of.reference.were.rather.unclear,.and.the.Forum.did.not.receive.a.sufficient.budget.of.its.own..This.position.is.also.reflected.in.the.opinions.of.those.involved.with.the.Forum,.ranging.from.strong.support.(“if.the.Forum.did.not.exist.it.should.be.invented”),.indifference,.to.strong.criticism,.and.the.suggestion.to.abandon.it..It.is.the.impression.of.the.Panel.that.the.involved.parties.find.that.the.mergers.as.such.have.not.had.a.positive.impact.on.the.cooperation.between.the.food.and.agricultural.industry.and.the.universities,.partly.as.a.result.of.the.lack.of.coordination.and.cooperation.between.the.66
5. The mergers
post-merger.universities..Instead.of.cooperation,.the.specific.areas.covered.by.the.Food.Fo-rum.are.characterised.by.more.competition.apparently.making.it.difficult.to.initiate.projects.that.would.require.the.involvement.of.more.than.one.university..An.evaluation.by.the.LMC.(Centre.for.Advanced.Food.Studies).International.Advisory.Board.has.even.drawn.the.con-clusion.that.the.inter-university.competition.might.jeopardize.the.leading.international.posi-tion.of.the.Danish.food.industry..Also.the.dissatisfying.results.of.the.Danish.universities,.especially.in.the.KBBE.part.of.the.EU’s.FP710,.are.partly.blamed.on.the.limited.post-merger.coordination.between.universities,.agricultural.sector,.and.industry..Furthermore.the.uni-versities.have.not.been.able.to.increase.the.number.of.students.in.the.programmes.of.direct.relevance.for.the.food.and.agricultural.industry,.while.also.the.cooperation.between.the.universities.and.Danish.university.colleges.was.seen.as.insufficient..Finally,.there.seems.to.be.a.lack.of.coordination.with.respect.to.the.PhD.schools.in.the.areas.in.question..All.in.all.the.Panel.got.the.impression.that,.first,.many.of.the.participants.are.dissatisfied.with.the.functioning.of.the.Food.Forum;.second,.the.expectations.with.respect.to.the.posi-tive.effects.of.the.Food.Forum.and.the.university.mergers.on.the.number.of.students.in.food.(and.agricultural).related.fields.(especially.in.master’s.programmes),.and.on.food.(and.agricultural).research.(including.an.increase.in.EU.funding).have.not.been.realised..From.that.starting.point.the.Panel.wonders.whether.the.main.underlying.national.issue.is.whether.Denmark.wants.to.maintain.if.not.strengthen.its.leading.role.in.agricultural.and.food.industry.production.and.export..Assuming.that.this.is.the.case,.the.food.and.agricul-tural.industry.(and.agricultural.export).related.university.education.and.research.activities.can.be.supported.and.stimulated.more.effectively.and.transparently.in.the.framework.of.a.national.‘Food.strategy’,.including.health.and.sustainable.agriculture.aspects.(not.unlike.the.Globalisation.Strategy)..
R
recommendation: develop a national food strategy>. Consider.setting.up.a.working.group.for.the.development.of.a.national.strategy.ad-dressing.a.national.food.strategy..The.mandate.of.such.a.working.group.should.also.include.the.development.of.a.more.effective.‘meeting.point’.for.the.food/agricultural.industry.interests.and.the.universities.(and.other.knowledge.organisations).involved.in.teaching.and.research.activities.in.food/agricultural.fields..From.the.observations.the.Panel.has.made.it.can.be.concluded.that.the.Food.Forum.in.its.current.set.up.is.not.functioning.effectively..If.the.Danish.Government.wants.to.make.the.interaction.between.the.food/agricultural.industry.and.the.public.sector.on.the.one.side.and.the.universities.on.the.other.side.more.effective,.it.could.consider.setting.up.a.working.group.for.the.development.of.a.national.strategy.addressing.the.above.questions..The.mandate.of.such.a.working.group.should.also.include.the.development.of.a.more.effective.‘meeting.point’.for.the.food/agricultural.industry.interests.and.the.universities.(and.other.knowledge.organisations).involved.in.teaching.and.research.activities.in.food/agricultural.fields..The.Danish.food.industry.is.a.world.leader,.based.on.long.traditions,.and.represents.many.important.national.interests..Consequently,.the.knowledge,.skills.and.competence.base.for.the.food.industry.is.a.national.strategic.issue..If.the.leadership.position.of.the.Danish.food.
10
.See.note.5.
67
5. The mergers
industry.is.to.be.maintained.in.the.future,.it.is.important.to.develop.a.national.strategy.for.food.industry.and.food.industry.related.research.and.innovation..The.main.questions.in.this.include.first.with.respect.to.research.and.innovation:.>. What.are.the.food.and.agricultural.areas.where.Denmark.is/wants.to.be.world.leader?>. What.kind.of.knowledge.basis.is.needed?.Is.the.current.knowledge.basis.satisfying?>. Which.universities/university.units.are.the.nodes.in.the.Danish.food.and.agricultural.industry.focused.knowledge.basis?.How.can.this.basis.be.maintained.and.strengthened?>. Is.the.research./.knowledge.production.and.application.capacity.sufficient.(qualita-tively.and.quantitatively)?.>. How.does.the.Danish.food.and.agricultural.industry.research.capacity.relate.to.interna-tional.knowledge.and.research.nodes?.>. How.successful.are.Danish.universities.(and.other.units).in.attracting.competitive.re-search.funding,.nationally.and.internationally.(especially.in.the.EU’s.FP7)?Second,.with.respect.to.the.education.and.training.of.people.working.as.researchers.in./.leading.the.food.and.agricultural.industry,.as.well.as.related.areas.such.as.food.control,.and.agricultural.sustainability,.the.main.questions.include:>. What.kind.of.master/PhD.programmes.does.Denmark.have?.>. What.are.the.student.behaviour.factors.that.influence.the.enrolment.level.in.these.pro-grammes?>. How.do.the.programmes.relate.to.the.training.needs.of.industry?.>. Do.the.universities.have.satisfying.lifelong.learning.structures?
5.7 recommendations on mergersIn.chapter.3.the.Panel.has.posed.the.question.whether.the.new.Danish.landscape.of.uni-versities.and.research.is.adequate.for.best.serving.the.interests.of.the.Danish.society.and.economy.and.whether.the.mergers.have.created.a.basis.for.stronger.university.profiles.>. With.respect.to.the.individual.universities,.though.the.mergers.are.not.yet.fully.material-ised,.the.Panel.finds.overall.positive.effects.from.the.integration.of.the.GRIs.and.universi-ties.as.well.as.the.mergers.between.universities..The.mergers.have.been.change.drivers.for.the.universities..The.Panel.has.found.that.the.mergers.have.created.an.input.for.stronger.university.profiles.and.thereby.improved.the.universities’.capacity.for.strategic.prioritising..As.the.question.of.university.profiles.did.not.exist.as.a.key.issue.for.the.merg-ers,.it.might.now.be.time.for.discussing.the.advantages.and.disadvantages.of.profiling.the.universities..The.Panel.therefore.recommends.a.debate.on.university.system.diversity,.aimed.at.determining.what.kind.of.diversity.basis.the.system.should.have..The.discussion.may.include.possible.targets.for.the.university.system.as.well.as.for.each.individual.uni-versity.when.it.comes.to.research.output.and.impact..Such.targets.may.be.included.in.the.development.contracts.and.should.be.based.on.proposals.from.the.universities..>. The.mergers.have.created.a.new.Danish.‘map.of.universities.and.research’..The.Panel’s.overall.impression.is.that.this.new.landscape.offers.a.potentially.diverse.research.basis.of.both.basic.and.applied.research.for.the.diverse.educational.programmes.developed.in.recent.years..Nevertheless,.we.recommend.the.adequacy.of.this.new.landscape.to.be.discussed.for.serving.the.interests.of.the.Danish.society.and.economy..The.Panel.rec-ommends.the.landscape.to.be.adjusted.with.further.mergers.and.other.adjustments.68
5. The mergers
>. The.three.non-merged.universities.all.have.distinctive.institutional.profiles..The.Panel.finds,.though,.that.the.situation.of.ITU.clearly.differs.from.the.situation.of.the.other.two.non-merged.universities..The.IT.University.is.overall.too.small.and.vulnerable.to.be.able.to.operate.in.a.satisfying.way.as.a.stand-alone.university..Amongst.other.things,.the.vulnerability.of.the.PhD.education.of.ITU.is.high.and.the.institutional.basic.research.platform.to.support.the.PhD.education,.as.well.as.the.relationship.to.indus-try,.is.not.sufficiently.strong..The.Panel.therefore.recommends.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.to.start.a.dialogue.with.ITU.for.determining.its.future.posi-tion.in.the.Danish.university.landscape..The.aim.of.this.dialogue.should.be.to.identify.one.or.more.possible.merger.partners.for.ITU.>. Concerning.the.still.non-merged.GRIs,.the.Panel.recommends.the.government.to.recon-sider.the.position.of.them.as.separate.institutions.outside.the.university.sector..The.Panel.does.not.consider.it.within.its.competence.to.identify.specific.merger.matches.for.the.re-maining.unmerged.GRIs..These.decisions.should.be.made.on.the.basis.of.clear.and.trans-parent.criteria.in.order.to.strengthen.certain.research.areas,.research.based.education.and.improved.relations.to.other.parts.of.society..The.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.In-novation.should.develop.criteria.for.strategic.decision.regarding.the.unmerged.GRIs...>. In.recognising.the.methodological.limitations,.imposed.by.the.very.short.period.since.the.mergers,.the.evaluation.framework.also.addresses.the.possible.effects.of.the.merg-ers.on.education,.research,.and.innovation,.as.well.as.the.universities’.relationship.with.the.private.sector.and.with.government-oriented.research..The.Panel.finds.it.difficult.to.relate.the.international.impact.of.research.to.the.mergers,.not.only.regarding.the.men-tioned.limitations,.but.also.as.“impact.on.research”.is.not.operationalised.clearly..The.Panel.recommends.EU-funding.to.be.further.stimulated,.especially.regarding.ERC.and.by.taking.leadership.roles.through.coordination.of.Cooperation.projects.and.networks.>. The.Panel.has.seen.some.new.offerings.in.education.as.a.result.of.the.mergers.and.the.competence.from.the.GRIs.has.to.some.extent.been.introduced.in.study.programmes..We.recommend.further.exploitation.of.the.opportunities.created.by.the.mergers,.as.well.as.regular.reviews.of.programmes..In.addition,.we.recommend.an.evaluation.of.the.challenges.and.difficulties.the.Danish.universities.face.in.comparison.with.other.European.universities.in.developing.and.maintaining.international.collaborations.in.education,.e.g..in.the.area.of.joint.degree.programmes.>. As.regards.university.relation.to.the.private.sector,.the.Panel.recommends.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.in.collaboration.with.the.universities,.to.initiate.further.investigations.and.develop.a.strategy.regarding.the.Danish.university-industry.collaboration.and.the.private.sector.funding.of.university.research..The.further.strat-egy.planning.could.take.basis.in.the.2007.Innovation.Action.Plan,.and.should.include.specific.actions.to.strengthen.university-private.sector.collaboration,.including.private.sector.funding.of.university.research.>. The.Panel.recommends.the.Danish.Government.to.make.the.interaction.between.the.food/agricultural.industry.and.the.universities.more.effective..This.may.be.based.on.the.development.of.a.national.strategy,.for.instance,.by.setting.up.a.working.group..The.mandate.of.such.a.working.group.should.include.an.evaluation.of.the.earlier.mergers.involving.food/.agricultural.institutions.in.order.to.develop.a.more.effective.arena.for.the.food/agricultural.industry.interests.and.the.universities.and.other.knowledge.or-ganisations.involved.in.teaching.and.research.activities.in.food/agricultural.fields.69
6. annexes
1. Terms of reference for the evaluation ...................................................................................................... 722. proposal for minimum contents of the 2009 evaluation of 18 november 2008 ....................................... 743. brief presentation of the evaluation panel members ............................................................................. 774. reference list of background documents for the evaluation .................................................................. 795. list of abbreviations used in the evaluation report ................................................................................. 836. meeting schedule for the evaluation, including programme for the evaluationpanel’s site visits in august ....................................................................................................................... 847. The danish university sector – a factual overview .................................................................................. 93
annex 1Terms of reference for The 2009 danishUniversiTy evalUaTion
PreambleWith.the.changes.of.the.university.law.in.2003.a.comprehensive.reform.of.the.university.management.structure.and.a.new.status.as.self.governing.institutions.for.universities.were.implemented.In.2007.this.was.followed.by.the.merging.of.12.universities.and.13.government.research.institutions.into.8.universities.and.4.government.research.institutions.The.aim.of.the.reforms.in.the.university.area.was.to.provide.universities.with.an.en-hanced.capacity.for.strategic.prioritization.across.their.core.areas.of.activity:.education,.research,.and.knowledge.transfer,.as.well.as.with.an.enhanced.ability.to.meet.demands.of.society.The.purpose.of.the.evaluation.is.to.investigate.the.issues.described.in.the.Danish.Parlia-ment’s.resolution.V9,.as.well.as.issues.concerning.the.development.of.degrees.of.freedom.for.the.universities,.cf..below.The.creation,.through.the.reform.of.2003,.of.a.clear.and.transparent.management.struc-ture.including.appointed.leaders.and.government.boards.with.a.majority.of.members.from.outside.the.university,.forms.the.basis.for.the.evaluation.The content of the evaluationThe.Danish.Parliament’s.resolution.V9.(Denmark’s.Liberal.Party,.The.Conservative.People’s.Party,.and.The.Danish.Social.Democrats).of.November.16,.2006.sets.out.the.framework.for.the.evaluation:“The.Danish.Parliament.accepts.the.answer.from.the.Minister.of.Science,.in.that.it:>. Notes.that.the.purpose.of.the.mergers.are.more.education,.greater.international.impact.of.research,.more.innovation.and.collaboration.with.industry,.the.attraction.of.more.research.funding.from.the.EU,.as.well.as.a.continued.competent.service.in.the.area.of.government.commissioned.research.>. Notes.that.the.institutions’.self-determination.has.been.the.core.principle.in.the.mergers.of.the.universities.and.the.government.research.institutions,.which.are.to.come.into.effect.on.January.1,.2007.>. Underlines.the.importance.of.the.university.law’s.provisions.concerning.research.freedom.and.employees’.freedom.to.participate.in.the.public.debate.>. Notes.that.the.Minister.of.Science.in.2009.will.conduct.an.evaluation.of.the.extent.to.which.the.purpose.of.the.university.mergers.has.been.achieved.>. Notes.that.the.Minister.of.Science.in.2009.furthermore.will.conduct.an.evaluation.of.the.state.of.codetermination.for.employees.and.students.at.the.universities,.the.free.academic.debate,.and.research.freedom,.under.the.current.university.law.”In.addition.the.development.of.degrees.of.freedom.for.the.universities.will.be.included.in.72
Annex 1: Terms of reference for The evAluATion
the.evaluation..This.will.entail.an.investigation.of.the.development.and.effect.of.both.the.regulatory.framework.for.universities.and.the.regulation.of.universities.through.financial.instruments.Relevant.stakeholders.within.the.different.subject.areas.of.the.evaluation,.including.employees,.students,.and.management.representatives.from.different.levels.of.the.university.organizations,.will.be.consulted.as.part.of.the.evaluation.process.The.evaluation.will.be.commenced.in.the.autumn.of.2008.and.finalized.before.the.end.of.2009.Evaluation panelThe.evaluation.will.be.conducted.independently,.cf..the.explanatory.notes.for.The Draft Bill to Changing the University Act (L140) of 31 January 2007.The.evaluation.will.be.organized.and.undertaken.by.an.independent.panel.of.experts.appointed.by.the.minister.of.science..The.panel.can.request.analysis.and.studies.from.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.or.private.consultants..Private.consultants.will.be.chosen.on.the.basis.of.a.public.tender..The.panel.will.be.given.secretary.assistance.independently.of.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.
73
annex 2proposal for minimUm conTenTs of The 2009evalUaTion of 18 november 2008
Based.on.the.Danish.Parliament’s.resolution.V9.(Denmark’s.Liberal.Party,.Conservatives,.The.Social.Democrats).of.November.16,.2006.as.well.as.the.wish.to.examine.the.status.of.the.development.of.degrees.of.freedom.for.the.universities,.the.independent.evaluation.in.the.university.area,.which.the.minister.of.science.must.undertake.in.2009,.will.focus.on.five.main.areas.A.. Fulfillment.of.the.purpose.of.university.mergers1.. More.education2.. Greater.international.impact.of.research3.. More.innovation.and.collaboration.with.industry4.. Attraction.of.more.EU-funding5.. Continued.competence.in.commissioned.services.to.governmentB.. Codetermination.for.employees.and.studentsC.. The.free.academic.debateD.. Research.freedomE.. Degrees.of.freedomExpected surveys and analysisThe.evaluation.will.be.based.on.a.number.of.surveys.and.analysis..Where.requested.data.is.already.available,.as.is.the.case.for.most.statistical.data,.UBST.will.be.responsible.for.the.analysis..Where.new.material.needs.to.be.produced,.e.g..in.interviews.and.surveys,.private.consultants.will.be.responsible.In.addition.to.the.following.analysis.and.surveys,.the.evaluation.panel.will.also.be.pro-vided.with.statements.from.the.universities.concerned.with.substantial.issues.related.to.the.evaluation’s.subject.areas..Area A1.. The.effect.of.the.mergers.on.university.education.will.be.examined..This.will.include.data.on.the.establishment.of.new.education.programs,.student.recruitment,.and.the.development.of.new.subject.areas.2.. The.effect.of.the.mergers.on.the.international.impact.of.research.will.be.examined..This.will.include.data.on.university.publication.activities,.the.attraction.of.foreign.re-search.funding,.university.ranking,.the.international.recruitment.of.students,.as.well.as.statements.from.the.universities.3.. The.effect.of.the.mergers.on.universities’.performance.within.innovation.and.collabo-ration.with.industry.will.be.examined..This.will.include.statistical.material.on.universi-ty-industry.links.as.well.as.on.patenting..4.. The.attraction.of.EU-funding.will.be.examined.based.on.the.success-rate.of.Danish.universities.in.EU-applications.5.. The.state.of.Danish.universities.activities.in.the.area.of.government.commissioned.services.will.be.examined.through.the.analysis.of.statistics.on.the.number.and.size.of.contracts.between.government.ministries.and.universities.
74
Annex 2: ProPosAl for minimum contents of the 2009 evAluAtion of 18 november 2008
Area BThe.status.of.codetermination.for.employees.and.students.at.the.Danish.universities.will.be.examined..This.will.be.done.through.a.survey.of.the.actual.organization.of.codeter-mination.at.all.levels.of.the.different.universities...Included.in.this.will.be.an.overview.over.the.internal.organization.of.each.university,.an.analysis.of.the.content.of.the.differ-ent.committees’.work.based.on.agendas.and.minutes,.and.interviews.with.leaders.from.all.levels.of.the.universities,.as.well.as.student.and.employees,.and.including.members.of.study.councils.and.academic.councils.Area CThe.state.of.the.free.academic.debate.at.Danish.universities.will.be.examined..This.will.be.done.through.an.examination.of.the.legal.and.organizational.framework.for.the.academic.debate,.through.the.analysis.of.statistics.on.the.participation.of.researchers.in.the.public.debate,.and.through.conducting.a.survey.among.researchers.Area DThe.state.of.research.freedom.at.the.Danish.universities.will.be.examined.both.in.relation.to.government.commissioned.research.and.university.research.in.general..Both.the.overall.academic.freedom.of.the.universities.as.described.in.articke.2.2.of.the.university.law,.and.the.research.freedom.of.the.individual.researcher.as.described.in.article.16a.7.and.article.17.2..The.analysis.will.include.statistics.on.university.financing.and.a.survey.among.re-searchers.Area EThe.development.of.degrees.of.freedom.for.the.universities.will.be.examined..The.analysis.will.include.analysis.of.the.development.of.the.regulatory.framework.for.universities.-.in-cluding.the.regulation.of.university.education.-.as.well.as.financial.incentives,.which.uni-versities.respond.to..Further.more,.leaders.at.all.level.of.the.university.will.be.interviewed.Universities,.which.were.not.part.of.the.merger.process,.will.be.included.in.all.areas.of.the.evaluation..Government.research.institutions.that.were.not.part.of.the.merger.process.will.be.included.when.relevant.Evaluation panelThe.evaluation.will.be.organized.and.carried.out.by.an.international.panel.of.experts.The.panel.can.request.further.studies.and.analysis.to.use.in.the.evaluation.The.evaluation.panel.will.have.secretary.assistance.independently.of.the.Ministry.of.Sci-ence,.Technology.and.Innovation..The.secretary.assistance.will.include.practical.and.or-ganizational.tasks,.as.well.as.help.in.producing.the.panel’s.final.report.
75
Annex 2: ProPosAl for minimum contents of the 2009 evAluAtion of 18 november 2008
appendix 1 draft list of expected analysis for the 2009-evaluationanalysisa1subject areaeducationQuantitative datanumber of new educationprogramsnumber of enrolled studentsdevelopment of new subjectsa2international impact ofresearchbibliometrics / citationspublicationsrankinginternational research fundingph.d.-school enrollmenta2a3international reputationof institutionsinnovation andcollaboration withindustrycollaboration with industryfi’s entrepreneurshipbarometerdea’s industry-researchbarometerstatistics on innovationpatentsa4a5attraction of eUfundingcompetence in thearea of governmentcommissionedresearchcompetence in thearea of governmentcommissionedresearchco-determinationco-determinationorganizational framework atparticular universitiesapplication success ratenumber and size of reportsdelivered to state agenciesstatement from universitiesUbsTstatement from universitiesUbsTQualitative dataconducted bydanishUniversityand propertyagency(UbsT)UbsT
a5
interviews with researchersinterviews with ”costumers”statement from universitiesinterviews with studentsand employees, includingmembers of study councilsand academic councils.analysis of meeting agendasand minutes.
consultant
bb
consultant
c
free academic debate- framework andstatisticsfree academic debate- perceived experienceresearch freedom foruniversitiesresearch freedom forresearchers
description of framework.statistics on researchers’media appearances.
statement from universities
UbsTconsultant
cd
survey among researchersThe relative proportions ofbasic funding and competitivefunding.statement from universities
consultant
d
survey among researchersinterviews with researchersregarding perceivedexperienceoverview of financialinstruments regulatinguniversities, the use ofdevelopment contracts inregulating universities, andthe regulatory framework ofuniversity education.The development in each ofabove areas in recent years.
consultant
e
degrees of freedom
UbsT
e
degrees of freedom
interviews with rectors, deansand heads of department.
consultant
76
annex 3brief presenTaTion of The evalUaTionpanel members
from left to right: georg winckler, elaine el-khawas, peter maassen, agneta bladh and abrar hasan
Brief.presentations.of.the.Panel.Members.are.indicated.in.the.following:Agneta Bladh (Panel Chair)Agneta.Bladh.holds.a.PhD.in.Political.Science..She.has.been.rector.at.University.of.Kalmar.since.2004..She.has.a.background.as.Director.General.at.the.Swedish.National.Agency.for.Higher.Education.1995-1998.and.as.State.Secretary.at.the.Swedish.Ministry.of.Education.and.Science.1998-2004..Agneta.Bladh.was.a.member.of.the.recent.Norwegian.government.commission.on.higher.education.(Stjernö-utvalget)..Agneta.Bladh.has.also.been.member.of.the.OECD.review.teams.on.tertiary.education.in.Denmark.(1997).and.China.(2000)...She.was.a.member of.the.Nordic.Science.Policy.Council.1995-98..Since.2008,.Agneta.Bladh.is.a.member.of.the.Administrative.Board.of.the.International.Association.of.Universities.(IAU).Elaine El-KhawasElaine.El-Khawas.is.a.professor.of.education.policy.at.George.Washington.University..She.has.been.a.consultant.and.advisor.for.UNESCO.and.OECD..She.participated.in.the.evaluation.of.the.Danish.university.policies.in.2003.and.in.the.evaluation.of.research.and.development.in.the.field.of.education.in.Denmark.in.2004..Abrar HasanAbrar.Hasan.holds.a.PhD.in.Economics..Currently.a.policy.consultant.to.governments.and.international.organisations,.Dr.Hasan.is.a.Consultant.Fellow.at.International.Institute.for.Educational.Planning.at.UNESCO.in.Paris..In.2007.he.retired.from.the.OECD.after.serving.as.Head.of.Education.and.Training.Policy.Division.since.1992..Dr.Hasan.has.conducted.comparative.education.and.labour.market.policy.studies.for.over.thirty.years,.focusing.primarily.on.the.OECD.countries.but.also.covering.many.developing.countries..He.is.cur-rently.writing.a.book.for.Springer.on.comparative.education.policy.in.OECD.countries,.covering.the.period.1990.-.2007...Peter MaassenPeter.Maassen.is.professor.in.Higher.Education.Studies,.and.member.of.the.Department.Board.with.responsibility.for.research,.at.the.Institute.for.Educational.Research,.Faculty.77
Annex 3 : Brief presentAtion of the evAluAtion pAnel MeMBers
of.Education,.University.of.Oslo..He.is.currently.a.member.of.the.Board.of.University.Col-lege.Oslo.(Høyskole.i.Oslo),.and.of.the.Board.of.the.Centrum.für.Hochschulentwicklung.(CHE)..Previously.he.has.been.the.director.of.the.Center.for.Higher.Education.Policy.Stud-ies.(CHEPS),.University.of.Twente,.the.Netherlands..He.has.been.a.member.of.the.recent.Norwegian.governmental.commission.on.higher.education.(Stjernö-utvalget),.as.well.as.of.OECD.review.teams.of.Japan.and.Finland..He.has.produced.over.100.international.publi-cations.on.higher.education.policy.issues.Georg WincklerProf..Georg.Winckler.studied.economics.at.Princeton.University.and.at.the.University.of.Vienna,.PhD.1968..Since.1978.he.has.been.Professor.of.Economics.and.since.1999.Rector.of.the.University.of.Vienna.(reelected.2003.and.2007)..From.2000.to.2005.he.was.Presi-dent.of.the.Austrian.Rectors’.Conference..From.2004.to.2007.he.was.a.member.of.EURAB.(European.Union.Research.Advisory.Board)..Prof..Winckler.was.Vice.President.of.the.EUA.(European.University.Association).from.2001-2005.and.President.of.the.EUA.from.2005-2009..Since.April.2008.he.has.been.a.member.of.ERAB.(European.Research.Area.Board).and,.since.February.2009,.Member.of.the.PEOPLE.Advisory.Group,.European.Commis-sion,.Brussels.
78
annex 4reference lisT of backgroUnd docUmenTs forThe evalUaTion
encl. noa1a2a3a4a5a6a7a8a9a10a11a12a13a14b1b2b3c1c2c3d1d2d3d4d5e1e2e3e4e5e6e7e8e9f1f2f3f4f5f6f7g1ag1bg1cg2a
overview of enclosuresdUpa: fulfilment of the purpose of the mergersdUpa: The merger processdUpa: fact sheet on the danish universitiesdUpa: fact sheet on present and former government research institutionsdUpa: The process regarding The kennedy centredUpa: international tendencies regarding university mergersdUpa: The danish quality assurance systemace-denmark: The development of the danish quality assurance systemdUpa: Trend and background note on the educational areadUpa: Trend and background note on the research areadUpa: Trend and background note on the innovation areadasTi: Trend and background note on the eU-funding areadUpa: Trend and background note of the research-based public-sector servicesdUpa: The national food forumdUpa: codetermination for employees and studentsdUpa: The existing institutional and legal framework for codeterminationdUpa: participation in elections at the universitiesdUpa: free academic debatedUpa: The existing institutional and legal framework for the academic debatedUpa: researchers participation in public and academic debatedUpa: research freedomdUpa: The existing institutional and legal framework for the research freedomdUpa: research financing analysisdasTi: description of the danish public research financing systemdUpa: development in the taximeter for educationdUpa: autonomydUpa: Theme paper on levels of autonomydUpa’s reply to universities’ response regarding levels of autonomydUpa: international debate on autonomydUpa: The financial regulation of the danish UniversitiesdUpa: The legal regulation of the danish UniversitiesdUpa: development contractsdUpa: academic staff at the universitiesdUpa: factual changes to the theme paper on autonomyprevious evaluations (not available on the evaluation web site)dUpa: independent institutions in the public sector administrationdUpa: equity and liquiditydUpa: analyses of the universities’ and the government research institutions’ financing and organisationdUpa: overview of legal acts on the universities (danish)dasTi: research evaluation guidelinesdasTi: action plan for research evaluationaalborg University – statementaalborg University - statement regarding autonomyaalborg University - reply regarding autonomyUniversity of aarhus - statement
79
Annex 4: RefeRence list of bAckgRound documents foR the evAluAtion
encl. nog2bg2cg2dg3ag3bg3cg4ag4bg5ag5bg6ag6bg6cg6dg6eg6fg6gg6hg7ag7bg7cg7dg7eg7fg7gg7hg7ig7jg7kg7lg8ag8bg8cg8dg8eg8fg8gh1h2h3h4h5i1ai1bi1ci1di1fi1gi1hi1ii1ji1k
overview of enclosuresUniversity of aarhus - statement regarding autonomyUniversity of aarhus - statement reply regarding autonomyUniversity of aarhus - strategy 2008-2012copenhagen business school – statementcopenhagen business school - statement regarding autonomycopenhagen business school - statement reply regarding autonomyiT-University – statementiT-University - statement regarding autonomyroskilde University - statementroskilde University - statement regarding autonomyTechnical University of denmark (dTU) - statementdTU - statement regarding autonomydTU - strategy 2008-2013dTU – from the dTU newspaper (in danish)dTU – new master programs (in danish)dTU – new further education degrees (in danish)dTU – statutes (in danish)dTU – rector’s speeches (in danish)University of copenhagen (kU) - statementUniversity of copenhagen (kU) - statement regarding autonomyUniversity of copenhagen (kU) - statement reply regarding autonomykU - appendix 1 – method and processkU - appendix 2 – strategy for University of copenhagenkU – appendix 3 – merger basis 2006 (in danish)kU – appendix 4 – merger finances (in danish)kU – appendix 5 – interdisciplinary researchkU – appendix 8 – organisation chartkU - appendix 7 – report on academic councils (in danish)kU – appendix 8 – organisation of faculties (in danish)kU – appendix 9 – section 17.2 in the university law (in danish)University of southern denmark (sdU) – statementUniversity of southern denmark (sdU) - statement regarding autonomysdU – attachment 1 – slide with presentation of mergersdU – outcome of consultation at faculty of engineeringsdU – outcome of consultation at faculty of health sciencesdU – outcome of consultation at faculty of humanitiessdU – outcome of consultation at the University libraryUniversities denmark: autonomyUniversities denmark: position papers on autonomyUniversities denmark: report: research-based public-sector servicesUniversities denmark: autonomy –replyUniversities denmark: forum for research-based public-sector services 090809statement from eUs - The geological survey of denmark and greenlandstatement from geUsgeUs publication catalogue 2008geUs: evaluation report - water resources - 2007geUs: evaluation of oil and gas related research - 2001geUs: evaluation report - programme area 4geUs: evaluation report - programme area 5geUs: act 536 on geUs.geUs: bill for geUs act with comments as introducedgeUs: statutes for geocenter danmark
80
Annex 4: RefeRence list of bAckgRound documents foR the evAluAtion
encl. noi1li1mi2ai2bi3ai3bi3ci4J1aJ1bJ1cJ1dJ1eJ1fJ1gJ1hJ2J3aJ3bJ3cJ4aJ4bJ4cJ5aJ5bJ5cJ5dJ5eJ5fJ5gJ5hJ5iJ5jJ5kJ6aJ6bJ6cJ6dJ6eJ6fJ6gJ6hJ7J8k1k2k3k4l1l2l3
overview of enclosuresgeUs: executive order on evaluation of research at geUsgeUs: list of members of the geUs board of directorsnfa – The national centre for working environment - cover letternfa - statementsfi – The danish national centre for social research – statementsfi evaluation cover letter to panelsfi: evaluation reportThe kennedy centre - statementministry of climate and energy - statementministry of climate and energy – danish energy agency-statementministry of climate and energy – danish north sea partner-statementministry of climate and energy – ministry of environment – statementministry of climate and energy – ministry of science etc. – statementministry of climate and energy – bureau of minerals etc. – statementministry of climate and energy – geUs science evaluationministry of climate and energy – minister’s letter to geUsministry of economic and business affairs – statementministry of employment – statementministry of employment – cover letterministry of employment – international evaluation of nfaministry of environment – statementministry of environment – toxicology statementministry of environment – geodesy and mapping statementministry of food, agriculture and fisheries - statementcontract between aarhus University and the ministry of food etc.appendix 1a to the contract between aarhus University and the ministry of food etc.appendix 1b to the contract between aarhus University and the ministry of food etc.appendix 2 to the contract between aarhus University and the ministry of food etc.appendix 3 to the contract between aarhus University and the ministry of food etc.appendix 4 to the contract between aarhus University and the ministry of food etc.framework agreement between ministry of food etc. and Technical University of dkperformance agreement between ministry of food etc. and dTUperformance agreement - danish veterinary and food adm. and dTU foodperformance agreement - danish veterinary and food adm. and dTU veterinary inst.ministry of health and preventionministry of health and prevention – framework agreement between ministry of health etc. andUniversity of southern denmarkpublications 2003 statens institut for folkesundhed (danish)publications 2004 statens institut for folkesundhed (danish)publications 2005 statens institut for folkesundhed (danish)publications 2006-2008 statens institut for folkesundhed (danish)ministry of health and prevension - statement of kennedy centreThe kennedy centre annual report (in danish) 2008ministry of social welfare – statementministry of Transport – statementdanish association of the pharmaceutical industrydanish consumer councildi – confederation of danish industryThe agricultural council of denmarkconsultancy report: research-based public-sector servicesconsultancy report: co-determinationconsultancy report: academic freedom
81
Annex 4: RefeRence list of bAckgRound documents foR the evAluAtion
encl. nol4l5l6m1m2m3m4m5am5bm5cm5dm5em5fm6m7
overview of enclosuresconsultancy report: freedom of researchconsultancy report: levels of autonomyconsultancy report: Joint appendix to all reportsac - danish confederation of professional associationsrepresentatives of students and university teachersconfederation of danish industrydanish chamber of commercepetition for a new University actpetition – press release (danish)petition – all signatures (danish – not public)petition – article (danish)petition – distribution of signaturespetition (danish)dJoef – danish association of lawyers and economistsacademic council of the faculty of social sciences, aarhus University – statement
References Aho,.E..et.al..(2006).Creating an Innovative Europe..Report.of.the.Independent.Expert.Group.on. R&D. and. Innovation. appointed. following. the. Hampton. Court. Summit.. (http://Eu-rope.eu.int/invest-in-research/)Amaral,.A.,.Jones,.G.A.,.and.Karseth,.B..(2202),.“Governing.Higher.Education:.Comparing.National. Perspectives”. in. Amaral,. A.,. Jones,. G.A.,. and. Karseth,. B.. (Eds.),.Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, pp..279-298,.Dor-drecht:.Kluwer.Chesbrough,.H..(2006).Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm..Oxford:.Oxford.Uni-versity.Press.Harman,.G..(1992),.Governance, Administration and Finance, Oxford:.Pergamon.Kelleher,.Michael.F.(2006),.‘The.Effectiveness.of.Governing.Bodies”,.IMHE.Seminar.on.Gov-erning Bodies of Higher Education Institutions: Roles and Responsibilities, OECD-IMHE.Website. ..King,.Roger.(2005),.“Higher.Educational.and.other.Charities.in.England”,.Seminar on High-er Education, 28-30.October,.Novi.Sad,.Serbia,.mimeo. .OECD.(2003),.Education Policy Analysis, Chapter.3,.“Changing.Patterns.of.Governance.in.Higher.Education”,.Paris..Olsen,.J.P..(2007).Europe in Search of Political Order. An Institutional Perspective on Unity/Diversity, Citizen/their Helpers, Democratic Design/Historical Drift, and the Co-Existence of orders..Oxford:.Oxford.University.Press.Salmi,.J...2009...The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. (Washington,.DC:..World.Bank)Science.(2004),.Reinventing.Europe’s.universities..Science.vol..304,.14.May.2004Walters,.Colin.(2006),.“University.Governance”,.IMHE.Seminar.on.Governing Bodies of Higher Education Institutions: Roles and Responsibilities, OECD-IMHE.Website. ...
82
annex 5lisT of abbreviaTions Used in TheevalUaTion reporT
abbreviationaaUacace denmarkasbaUbriccbscernchedffdTUdUpaecTseheaeraerceUfpfp7gdpgeUsgovrdgriherdiTUkbbe (fp7)kUlmcnfanifU-sTepnihnsfoecdoshr&drUcsbisdUsfismesUkUswpaaalborg Universitydanish confederation of professional associationsaccreditation agency for higher educationaarhus school of businessaarhus Universitybrazil, russia, india, and chinacopenhagen business schooleuropean organization for nuclear researchcentrum für hochschulentwicklungdanish food forumTechnical University of denmarkdanish University and property agencyeuropean credit Transfer and accumulation systemeuropean higher education areaeuropean research areaeuropean research councileuropean Unionframework programmeseventh framework programmegross domestic productgeological survey of denmark and greenlandgovernment research and developmentgovernment research institutehigher education research and developmentiT University of copenhagenknowledge based bio-economy (food, agriculture and fisheries, biotechnology)University of copenhagencentre for advanced food studiesnational research centre for the working environmentnorsk institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanningnational institutes of healthnational science foundationorganisation for economic co-operation and developmentoccupational safety and healthresearch and developmentroskilde Universitydanish building research instituteUniversity of southern denmarkdanish national centre for social researchsmall and medium sized enterprisesUnited kingdomUnited states of americaworkplace assessments
83
annex 6meeTing schedUle for The evalUaTion, inclUdingprogramme for The evalUaTion panel siTe visiTs’sin aUgUsT.Panel’s Meeting schedule All.Panel.meetings.have.taken.take.place.in.Copenhagen,.except.the.4th.meeting..The.tour.was.to.all.Danish.Universities.1st.Panel.meeting.2nd.Panel.meeting..Meeting.with.stakeholders3rd.Panel.meeting..Tour.at.universities.and.meetings.with.stakeholders.4th.Panel.meeting.5th.Panel.meeting.10th.December.2008.(Copenhagen)30th.April.2009.(Copenhagen)12th.May.2009.(Copenhagen)
14th-15th.June.2009.(Copenhagen)20th-28th.August.2009.(Copenhagen,.Aalborg,.Aarhus,.Odense)
4th-5th.October.2009.(Vienna)1st-2nd.November.2009.(Copenhagen)
Programme for the Evaluation Panel’s Tour at the Danish Universities and meetings with other stakeholders 20th-28th August 2009Version.19th.August.2009Thursday 20th August 200910.00.-.10.30Panel meeting with the DUPA secretariatMeeting.room.BMinistry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.4310.30.-.13.1513.15.-.14.00Panel meetingMeeting.room.BLunch - panel.and.internal.secretariatMeeting.room.A.Ministries commissioning research at universitiesMeeting.room.BMinistry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Ministry.of.EnvironmentDeputy.Director.General.Helle.Pilsgaard,.Agency.for.Spatial.and.Environmental.PlanningSpecial.Adviser.Susanne.MartensMinistry.of.Food,.Agriculture.and.Fisheries84
14.00.-.15.30
Head.of.Division.Morten.EjrnæsMinistry.of.Economic.and.Business.AffairsHead.of.Division.Lasse.Sundahl,.Danish.Enterprise.and.Construction.Agency.(arrives.14.45)
Meeting.room.BMinistry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Annex 6: Meeting schedule for the evAluAtion, including progrAMMe for the evAluAtion pAnel’s site visits in August
Ministry.of.Environment
Deputy.Director.General.Helle.Pilsgaard,.Agency.for.Spatial.and.Environmental.PlanningSpecial.Adviser.Susanne.MartensMinistry.of.Food,.Agriculture.and.FisheriesHead.of.Division.Morten.EjrnæsMinistry.of.Economic.and.Business.AffairsHead.of.Division.Lasse.Sundahl,.Danish.Enterprise.and.Construction.Agency.(arrives.14.45)Ministry.of.TransportHead.of.Division.Tine.Lund.JensenHead.of.Section.Anne.Louise.KristiansenMinistry.of.Health.and.PreventionHead.of.Division.Katrine.Schjønning.15.30.-.17.00Non-merged institutions and their ministriesMeeting.room.BMinistry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Ministry.of.Climate.and.EnergyHead.of.Section.Line.Skou.HauschildtGEUS.–.The.Geological.Survey.of.Denmark.and.GreenlandChair.of.Board.Per.Buch.AndreasenDirector.Johnny.Fredericia.Deputy.Director.Bjørn.Kaare.Jensen.Deputy.Director.Getruer.ChristiansenMinistry.of.EmploymentHead.of.Division.Søren.KryhlmandNFA.–.The.National.Centre.for.Working.EnvironmentDirector.Palle.ØrbækMinistry.of.Interior.and.Social.AffairsHead.of.Division.Jens.Kristian.PoulsenHead.of.Section.Carsten.Skovgaard.NielsenHead.of.Section.Palle.Dam.LeegaardSFI.–.The.Danish.National.Centre.for.Social.ResearchChair.of.Board.Peter.Nannestad.Director.Jørgen.SøndergaardMinistry.of.Health.and.PreventionHead.of.Division.John.Erik.PedersenSpecial.Adviser.Jacob.StudsgaardThe.Kennedy.CentreDirector.Karen.Brøndum-NielsenDeputy.Director.Inger.Marie.Bruun-VierøResearch.Professor.Zeynep.Tümer17.00.-.18.00The Danish Confederation of Professional Associations’s negotiation preparatory committee on the university and research area (AC/FUF)Meeting.room.BDanish.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Ingrid.Stage,.chair.of.AC/FUF.and.chair.of.DM,.Dansk.MagisterforeningAssociate.Professor.Ole.Sonne,.Danish.Medical.Association’s.representative.in.AC/FUFAssociate.Professor.Leif.Søndergaard,.Member.of.Board.in.DMSenior.Adviser.Philip.Nordentoft,.AC.Friday 21st August 20098.30.-.12.15University of Copenhagen.Udvalgsværelse.3.og.4,.Nørregade.10,.opgang.N
85
Ingrid.Stage,.chair.of.AC/FUF.and.chair.of.DM,.Dansk.MagisterforeningAssociate.Professor.Ole.Sonne,.Danish.Medical.Association’s.representative.in.AC/FUFAnnex 6: Meeting schedule for the evAluAtion, including progrAMMe for the evAluAtion pAnel’s site visits in AugustAssociate.Professor.Leif.Søndergaard,.Member.of.Board.in.DMSenior.Adviser.Philip.Nordentoft,.AC.Friday 21st August 20098.30.-.12.158.30.-.8.45University of Copenhagen.Udvalgsværelse.3.og.4,.Nørregade.10,.opgang.NManagementChair.of.Board.Bodil.Nyboe.AndersenRector.Ralf.HemmingsenPro-rector.Lykke.FriisUniversity.Director.Jørgen.Honoré.Chief.Adviser.Torben.Rytter.KristensenAcademic staff 1Academic staff 2Appointed.by.collaboration.committeeAppointed.by.deansAssociate.Professor.Henrik.prebensen.Professor.Margit.Warburg.Associate.Professor.Leif.Søndergaard.Professor.Peter.Gundelach.Associate.Professor.Thomas.Vils.Pedersen.Associate.Professor.Ylva.Hellsten.Professor,.dr..scient..Harald.S..Hansen.Professor.Merete.Fredholm.Professor.Kirsten.Busch.NielsenAssociate.Professor.Mikael.Rask.Madsen.Professor,.dr..med..Niels.Tommerup.BreakStudents Technical and administrative staffAppointed.by.deansJan.Nejdl.RasmussenLouise.LipczakSpecial.Adviser.Katja.Sander.Johansen.Ronnie.TaarnborgHead.of.Section.Sune.Germann.Jensen.Catherine.LindDepartment.administrator.Maja.Puk.NielsenLaboratory.coordinator.Anette.L..EriksenAll.participants.are.members.of.The.Students. Department.administrator.Margit.BendtsenHead.of.Section.Peter.Haugegaard.LaugesenCouncil.at.University.of.CopenhagenResearch.Adviser.Hans.Christian.Køie.Poulsen.Special.Adviser.Maj.Hendin.Leth-EspensenAppointed.by.collaboration.committeeLaboratory.technician.Joan.Lykkeaa.Librarian.Lene.Kaad.Ingrid.Kryhlmand.11.15.-.12.15Management Chair.of.Board.Bodil.Nyboe.AndersenRector.Ralf.HemmingsenPro-rector.Lykke.FriisUniversity.Director.Jørgen.Honoré.Chief.Adviser.Torben.RytterRoskilde University Welcome by rectorat Rector.Henning.Salling.OlesenPro-rector.Jørgen.Ole.BærenholdtMembers of academic council, liaison committeeAssociate.Professor.Leif.Emil.HansenAssociate.Professor.Niels.Christian.Juul.Laboratory.Senior.Assistant.Anne-Grete.Winding.Student.Kirstine.Fabricius.Student.Torben.Holm-Lauritzen
8.45.-.10.00
10.00.-.10.1510.15.-.11.15
14.00.-.17.0014.00.-.14.30
14.30.-.15.45
Academic forum and student representativesProfessor.Mogens.Niss.Laboratory.Senior.Assistant.Marianne.Lauridsen
86
Pro-rector.Jørgen.Ole.Bærenholdt14.30.-.15.45Members of academic council, liaison Academic forum and student representativesAnnex 6: Meeting schedule for the evAluAtion, including progrAMMe for the evAluAtion pAnel’s site visits in AugustcommitteeProfessor.Mogens.Niss.Associate.Professor.Leif.Emil.HansenLaboratory.Senior.Assistant.Marianne.Associate.Professor.Niels.Christian.Juul.LauridsenLaboratory.Senior.Assistant.Anne-Grete.Winding.Student.Kirstine.Fabricius.Student.Torben.Holm-Lauritzen15.45.-.17.00Board and managementChair.of.Board.Christian.NissenMember.of.Board.Helge.Hvid,.internal.member.Member.of.BoardRector.Henning.Salling.OlesenPro-rector.Jørgen.Ole.BærenholdtUniversity.Director.Peter.LaurizenHeads.of.departmentSpecial.Advisor.Maria.Volf.Lindhardt
Monday 24th August 20098.00.-.10.008.00.-.8.35IT-University of Copenhagen Academic staffProfessor.Jakob.BardramVisiting.Professor.Randi.MarkussenAssociate.Professor.Kasper.ØsterbyeBreakStudentsKasper.Videbæk.NielsenMads.Ravn.Signe.Geckler.JørgensenBreakBoard and managementChair.of.Board.Mogens.Munk-RasmussenMember.of.Board.Jon.Wulff.PetersenMember.of.Board..Lisbeth.Zornig.AndersenRector.Mads.ToftePro-rector.Jørgen.StaunstrupHead.of.Department.Jens.Christian.Godskesen
8.35.-.8.40.8.40.-.9.15
Technical and administrative staffAcademic.Staff..Malene.De.Bruin.Special.Adviser.Hanne.Sørensen.
9.15.-.9.209.20.-.10.00
13.00.-.16.00
Aalborg UniversityKonsistoriesalen.på.1..sal.i.Studenterhuset,.Gammeltorv.10Board and managementChair.of.Board.Frank.Jensen..Deputy.Chair.of.Board.Birgitte.PossingAcademic.Representative.Kenn.Steger-JensenRe. tor.Finn.Kjærsdamc.Pro-rector.Hanne.Kathrine.KrogstrupUniversity.Director.Peter.PlengeDean.Frede.Blaabjerg,.The.Faculties.of.Engineering,.Science.and.MedicineDean.Allan.Næs.Gjerding,.Faculty.of.Social.SciencesDean.Lone.Dirckinck-Holmfeld,.Faculty.of.HumanitiesChief.Librarian.Niels-Henrik.Gylstorff,.Aalborg.University.LibraryDirector.Thorkild.Ærø,.Danish.Building.Research.Institute.(SBi)Head.of.Secretariat.Lene.Krogh-Jørgensen,.Management.SecretariatSpecial.Adviser.Niels.Dahl.Thellufsen,.Management.Secretariat
13.00.-.13.45
87
Re. tor.Finn.Kjærsdamc.Pro-rector.Hanne.Kathrine.KrogstrupUniversity.Director.Peter.PlengeAnnex 6: Meeting schedule for the evAluAtion, including progrAMMe for the evAluAtion pAnel’s site visits in AugustDean.Frede.Blaabjerg,.The.Faculties.of.Engineering,.Science.and.MedicineDean.Allan.Næs.Gjerding,.Faculty.of.Social.SciencesDean.Lone.Dirckinck-Holmfeld,.Faculty.of.HumanitiesChief.Librarian.Niels-Henrik.Gylstorff,.Aalborg.University.LibraryDirector.Thorkild.Ærø,.Danish.Building.Research.Institute.(SBi)Head.of.Secretariat.Lene.Krogh-Jørgensen,.Management.SecretariatSpecial.Adviser.Niels.Dahl.Thellufsen,.Management.Secretariat13.45.-.14.30Academic staff I Academic staff 2Senior.Researcher.Jacob.Norvig.Associate.Professor.Lars.Bo.Henriksen.Associate.Professor.Jesper.Lindgaard.Associate.Professor.Lars.Andersen.Christensen.Associate.Professor.Jens.Kirk.Professor.Peter.Kragh.Jespersen.14.30.-.15.15StudentsTechnical and administrative staffChair.Thea.Kristensen,.Studentersamfundet.Assistant.Engineer.Per.Knudsen(Student.organisation.at.AAU).Head.of.Division.Lisbeth.RostedLasse.Brunø.Morten.Tychsen15.15.-.16.00ManagementRector.Finn.KjærsdamPro-rector.Hanne.Kathrine.KrogstrupUniversity.Director.Peter.PlengeHead.of.Secretariat.Lene.Krogh-Jørgensen,.Management.SecretariatSpecial.Consultant.Niels.Dahl.Thellufsen,.Management.Secretariat
Tuesday 25th August 20098.15Departure hotel8.30.-.12.15Aarhus University.Rektoratets.mødelokale,.bygn..1430,.1..etage8.30.-.9.30Board and managementChair.of.Board.Jens.BigumRector.Lauritz.B..Holm-NielsenPro-rector.of.the.strategic.area.Søren.Elkjær.FrandsenUniversitety.Director.Jørgen.JørgensenAcademic staff 1 – old Aarhus UniversityAcademic staff 2 – merged institutionsResearch.Professor.Bent.Tolstrup.Christensen.Associate.Professor.Søren.PoldSenior.Researcher.Rasmus.Ejrnæs.Professor.John.Michael.Hasenkam.Associate.Professor.Paul.Krüger.Andersen.Professor.Tonny.Brems.KnudsenProfessor.Per.Ingesman.Research.Programme.Manager.Steen.Høyrup.PedersenProfessor.Klaus.MølmerProfessor.Susan.Wright.Professor.Dion.Sommer.Associate.Associate.Researcher.Helle.Ørsted.Nielsen.Professor.Finn.Folkmann.Senior.Researcher.Jacob.SehestedAssociate.Professor.Per.Dahl.StudentsTechnical and administrative staffSvend.Dyrholm.Biomedical.Scientist.Anne.Marie.Bundsgaard.HK.Joint.Union.Representative.Anna.Louise.Maja.Viola.BuskbjergAnna.Bagger.Plaskett.TAP.Joint.Union.Representative.Aase.Pedersen.Ronni.Mikkelsen.Buildings.Manager.Uffe.Pilegaard.LarsenRasmus.Kerrn.International.Students.Adviser.Steen.Weisner.Thea.Frederiksen.Mette.Tovsigs.Member.of.technical.and.administrative.staff.Michael.StjernholmManagementChair.of.Board.Jens.BigumRector.Lauritz.B..Holm-NielsenPro-rector.of.the.strategic.area.Søren.Elkjær.Frandsen
9.30.-.10.30
10.30.-.11.30
11.30.-.12.0088
Ronni.Mikkelsen.TAP.Joint.Union.Representative.Aase.Pedersen.Rasmus.Kerrn.Buildings.Manager.Uffe.Pilegaard.LarsenAnnex 6: Meeting schedule for the evAluAtion, including progrAMMe for the evAluAtion pAnel’s site visits in AugustThea.Frederiksen.International.Students.Adviser.Steen.Weisner.Member.of.technical.and.administrative.staff.Mette.Tovsigs.Michael.Stjernholm11.30.-.12.00ManagementChair.of.Board.Jens.BigumRector.Lauritz.B..Holm-NielsenPro-rector.of.the.strategic.area.Søren.Elkjær.FrandsenUniversity.Director.Jørgen.Jørgensen 15.00.-.16.30The Danish Confederation of Professional Associations (AC)Rectors.meeting.roomCampusvej.55,.Odense.Chair.of.AC.Erik.JyllingDirector.Martin.TeilmannChief.analyser.Birgit.Bangskjær16.30.-.18.00Universities DenmarkRectors.meeting.room,.Campusvej.55,.OdenseRector.Jens.Oddershede,.University.of.Southern.DenmarkRector.Lauritz.Holm-Nielsen,.Aarhus.UniversityRector.Ralf.Hemmingsen,.University.of.Copenhagen19.00.-.Dinner with Universities DenmarkParticipants.Universities.DenmarkRector.Jens.Oddershede,.University.of.Southern.DenmarkRector.Lauritz.Holm-Nielsen,.Aarhus.UniversityRector.Ralf.Hemmingsen,.University.of.CopenhagenParticipants.Panel.members,.internal.secretariat.and.Pernille.Meyn.Milthers
Wednesday 26th August 20099.00.-.12.00University of Southern Denmark.9.00.-.10.15Board and managementRoom.O.77Member.of.Board.C.C..NielsenMember.of.Board.Karsten.OhrtRector.Jens.OddershedePro-rector.Bjarne.Graabech.SørensenUniversity.Director.Per.Overgaard.NielsenAcademic staff 1Room.O.77Professor.Anne-Marie.MaiProfessor.Ewa.Roos.Professor.Ole.G..MouritsenHead.of.Department.Lars.DyhrProfessor.Dannie.KjeldgaardStudentsRoom.O.77Jens.Theil.Jesper.Nielsen.KroghLasse.Rahn.Freja.BrandhøjMaren.AstrupNadja.Frederiksen
10.20.-.11.10
Academic Staff 2.Room.O.79Professor,.Head.of.Research.Morten.GrønbækAssociate.Professor.Bjarne.Andersenph.d.-student.Marie.Kruseph.d.-student.Bjarke.LiboriussenTechnical and administrative staff.Room.O.79Member.of.Board,.senior.assistant.Bodil.KjærsgaardSpecial.Adviser.Hjørdis.AlbrektsenChief.Adviser,.Deputy.Head.Annette.Schmidt89Correspondent.Inger.Rose.HansenLaboratory.Technician.Irene.Mose.Andersen
11.15.-.12.05
Professor.Dannie.Kjeldgaard11.15.-.12.05StudentsTechnical and administrative staff.Annex 6: Meeting schedule for the evAluAtion, including progrAMMe for the evAluAtion pAnel’s site visits in AugustRoom.O.77Room.O.79Jens.Theil.Jesper.Nielsen.KroghLasse.Rahn.Freja.BrandhøjMaren.AstrupNadja.FrederiksenMember.of.Board,.senior.assistant.Bodil.KjærsgaardSpecial.Adviser.Hjørdis.AlbrektsenChief.Adviser,.Deputy.Head.Annette.SchmidtCorrespondent.Inger.Rose.HansenLaboratory.Technician.Irene.Mose.AndersenAdministrative.Officer.Kirsten.Zachariassen.
15.30.-.17.30
Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and InnovationMeeting.room.BDanish.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Permanent.Secretary.Uffe.Toudal.PedersenDirector.General.Jens.Peter.JacobsenDirector.General.Inge.MærkedahlHead.of.Division.Jacob.FuchsSpecial.Adviser.Gitte.BækkeSpecial.Adviser.Pernille.Meyn.Milthers
17.30.-.19.00
Ministry of FinanceMeeting.room.BDanish.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Head.of.Division.Andreas.BerggreenChief.Adviser.Peter.BarslundSpecial.Adviser.Nanna.Meilbak
Thursday 27th August 200908.15.-.12.00Technical University of Denmark 8.15.-.9.00ManagementRoom.3.(101)Chair.of.Board.Sten.ScheibyeRector.Lars.PallesenVice-director.Dan.JensenChief.Adviser.Henrik.TäckholmBreakAcademic staff 1Professor.Knut.Conradsen,.prorector.Professor.Ole.Hassager.Associate.Professor.Niels.Engholm.HenriksenProfessor.Dorte.Juul.JensenProfessor.Jens.Kehlet-NørskovProfessor.Jens.Juul.RasmussenRoom.3.(101)BreakStudentsPresident.Torben.Schmidt.Ommen,.Polyteknisk.Forening.Stinne.Marie.PræstegaardChair.Thomas.Krüger,.DSE.(The.Students.Business.Contact).President.Johan.Grundtvig,.BEST.(Board.of.European.students.of.Technology)Room.3.(101)Break
9.00.-.9.159.15.-.10.00
Academic staff 2Professor.Anders.BjarklevProfessor.Anne.MeyerAssociate.Professor.Bo.Friis.NielsenProfessor.Kim.Pilegaard.Professor.Carsten.Rode
10.00.-.10.1510.15.-.11.15
Technical and administrative staffLibrarian.Helle.Warburg.Machine.operator.Jan.Horne.Hansen.Laboratory.Technician.Mogens.Hulmose.KristensenAdministrative.Officer.Janne.Kofod.Lassen.Research.Technician.Søren.Robert.Nimb
90
11.15.-.11.30
10.15.-.11.15
StudentsTechnical and administrative staffPresident.Torben.Schmidt.Ommen,.Polyteknisk. Librarian.Helle.Warburg.Machine.operator.Jan.Horne.Hansen.Forening.Annex 6: Meeting schedule for the evAluAtion, including progrAMMe for the evAluAtion pAnel’s site visits in AugustLaboratory.Technician.Mogens.Hulmose.Stinne.Marie.PræstegaardKristensenChair.Thomas.Krüger,.DSE.(The.Students.Administrative.Officer.Janne.Kofod.Lassen.Business.Contact).President.Johan.Grundtvig,.BEST.(Board.of.Research.Technician.Søren.Robert.NimbEuropean.students.of.Technology)Room.3.(101)BreakVisit to DTU-MecanicsBus.transports.all.to.the.visit.at.DTU-MecanicsHead.of.Department.Henrik.Carlsen,.Professor.Professor.Preben.Terndrup.Pedersen.Professor.Jens.Nørkær.Sørensen.Rector.Lars.Pallesen.
11.15.-.11.3011.30.-.12.00
13.30.-.14.30
HK (trade union for commercial and clerical employees)Meeting.room.21Chair.of.HK/State.Thora.PetersenChair.of.the.National.Association.for.Higher.Educational.Institutions.in.HK/State.Aase.PedersenSpecialist.Secretary.Hans-Henrik.Nielsen,.HK/State
15.00.-.18.0015.00.-.15.1015.10.-.16.00
Copenhagen Business SchoolWelcome by Johan.Roos,.rector.of.CBSAugustinus.Fonden.board.meeting.RoomAcademic staff 1Room:.Hans.CavalliProfessor.Niels.Bjørn-Andersen.Professor..Morten.OugaardStudentsRoom.Hans.CavalliDitte-Marie.Winther.Thomas.EdvardsenNicki.Brøchner.NielsenAcademic staff 2Room:.Augustinus.Fonden.board.meeting.roomAssociate.Professor.and.Director.Lise.Lyck.Associate.Professor.Ole.HelmersenAssociate.Professor.Anne.Reff.PetersenTechnical and administrative staffRoom:.LedergruppenSenior.Adviser.Lars.ThorsenHead.of.Secretariat.Henrik.Hermansen.Senior.Assistant.Daniel.RotenbergProgramme.Secretary.Pia.Clasen
16.00.-.16.45
16.45.-.18.00
Board and daily managementChair.of.Board.Anders.KnutsenMember.of.Board.Eva.BernekeMember.of.Board.Thomas.Plenborg,.internally.elected.Member.of.Board.Uffe.Arnesen.Gade,.internally.electedMember.of.Board.Patrick.Gram,.internally.elected.Rector.Johan.Roos.Dean.of.Research.Alan.IrwinDean.of.Education.Jan.MolinDean.CBS.Executive.Christer.KarlssonUniversity.Director.Peter.Pietras
Friday 28th August 20098.00.-.9.15Business AssociationsMeeting.room.B,.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Agricultural.Council.of.Denmark.(Landbrug.og.Fødevarer)Director.of.Foodstuff.and.Research.Annette.Toft.Director.of.Food.&.Veterinary.Relationship.Erik.Bisgaard.MadsenConfederation.of.Danish.Industry91
Annex 6: Meeting schedule for the evAluAtion, including progrAMMe for the evAluAtion pAnel’s site visits in August
Friday 28th August 2009
8.00.-.9.15
Business AssociationsMeeting.room.B,.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Agricultural.Council.of.Denmark.(Landbrug.og.Fødevarer)Director.of.Foodstuff.and.Research.Annette.Toft.Director.of.Food.&.Veterinary.Relationship.Erik.Bisgaard.MadsenConfederation.of.Danish.IndustryHead.of.Educational.Policy.Bjarne.LundagerConsultant.Katrine.DiBonaThe.Danish.Chamber.of.CommerceHead.of.Research.Policy.Jannik.Schack.Linnemann
9.15.-.10.00
Forum for research-based public-sector servicesmeeting.room.BDanish.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation,.Bredgade.43Rector.Lars.Pallesen,.Technical.University.of.Denmark.(Chairman.of.the.forum).Rector.Lauritz.B..Holm-Nielsen,.University.of..AarhusPro-rector.Søren.E.Frandsen,.University.of.AarhusHead.of.Public.Sector.Consultancy.Jakob.Fritz.Hansen,.Technical.University.of.Denmark..Special.Adviser.Charlotte.Richardt,.Universities.Denmark.
10.00.-.11.00
Student organisationsConservative.StudentsLisa.Mette.TønderMette.Hjøllund.Sacha.ErhardtsenFree.Forum.–.Social.Democratic.StudentsStudent.Policy.Spokesperson.Max.GenskeLiberal.studentsNational.Chair.Tej.F..EgefjordNational.Vice.Chair.Anne.GæmelkeThe.National.Union.of.Students.in.Denmark.(DSF)Educational.Policy.Spokesperson,.Vice.Chair.Nils.Wiese.Maja.Viola.Buskbjerg,.Aarhus.UniversityJan.Nejdl.Rasmussen,.University.of.Copenhagen
11.00.-.12.00
National Food ForumChair,.Director.General.Leo.LarsenPro-rector.Søren.E..Frandsen,.Aarhus.UniversityPro-rector.Knut.Conradsen,.Technical.University.of.Denmark.Director.of.Foodstuff.and.Research.Annette.Toft,.Agricultural.Council.of.Denmark.Head.of.Division.Jacob.Fuchs,.Danish.University.and.Property.AgencySumming upSumming up and adjourn (with the secretariat)
13.15.-.15.3015.30.-.16.30
92
annex 7The danish UniversiTy secTor– a facTUal overview
1. Organisational structure of the university sectorDenmark.has.eight.universities.–.University.of.Copenhagen,.Aarhus.University,.Techni-cal.University.of.Denmark,.University.of.Southern.Denmark,.Aalborg.University,.Roskilde.University,.Copenhagen.Business.School,.and.the.IT.University..The.universities.varies.in.size.but.are.all.regulated.by.the.University.Act.To.the.institutional.structure.for.research.and.education.belong.also.five.government.re-search.institutions.(GRIs).which.are.placed.under.four.different.government.ministries..The.five.institutions.are:.The.National.Research.Centre.for.the.Working.Environment.(NFA),.The.Geological.Survey.of.Denmark.and.Greenland.(GEUS),.the.Kennedy.Center,.The.Danish.National.Centre.for.Social.Research.(SFI).and.Statens.Serum.Institut.The.present.“map.of.universities.and.research”.was.implemented.in.the.Danish.univer-sity.sector.with.effect.from.1.January.2007..New.universities.were.established.on.basis.of.mergers.between.some.universities.and.GRIs..Before.the.merger.there.existed.a.total.of.25.institutions.–.12.universities.and.13.GRIs.Figure.1.shows.the.present.“map.of.universities.and.research”..For.each.of.the.eight.uni-versities,.the.figure.also.lists.the.institutions.with.which.the.university.merged.
aalborg Universityaalborg Universitydanish building research instituteUniversity of aarhusUniversity of aarhusÅrhus school of businessdanish University of educationdanish institute of agricultural sciencesnational environmental research instituteUniversity of southern denmarkUniversity of southern denmarknational institute of public health
Technical University of denmarkTechnical University of denmarkrisø national laboratorydanish institute for food and veterinaryresearchdanish national space centredanish institute for fisheries researchdanish Transport research institute
University of copenhagenUniversity of copenhagendanish University of pharmaceuticalsciencesroyal veterinary and agricultural UniversityiT University of copenhagencopenhagen business schoolThe national research institutionsgeUs - The national geological surveys ofdenmark and greenlandnfa - The national research centre for theworking environmentsfi - The national centre for socialresearchThe kennedy centrestatens serum institut
roskilde University
figure 1: The danish university sector 2009
Before.the.mergers.there.were.twelve.universities,.two.of.which.merged.with.University.of.Copenhagen.(the.Danish.University.of.Pharmaceutical.Sciences.and.the.Royal.Veterinary.and.Agricultural.University)..Two.universities.merged.with.Aarhus.University.(the.Aarhus.School.of.Business.and.the.Danish.University.of.Education).93
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
A.total.of.nine.GRIs.merged.with.universities..Five.GRIs.were.merged.with.the.Technical.University.of.Denmark,.namely.Risoe.National.Laboratory,.the.Danish.Institute.for.Food.and.Veterinary.Research,.the.Danish.Institute.for.Fisheries.Research,.the.Danish.National.Space.Centre.and.the.Danish.Transport.Research.Institute.Aarhus.University.merged.with.two.GRIs.–.the.Danish.Institute.of.Agricultural.Sciences.and.the.National.Environmental.Research.Institute.–.while.the.National.Institute.of.Public.Health.was.integrated.into.the.University.of.Southern.Denmark.and.The.Danish.Building.Research.Institute.was.integrated.into.Aalborg.University..The.GRIs.were.integrated.into.the.universities.in.the.form.of.faculties,.departments.or.pro-fessional.units..The.mergers.resulted.in.significant.alterations.in.profiles.or.task.structures,.which.were.mirrored.in.the.new.university.boards.appointed..At.several.universities.new.management.structures.were.introduced.concurrently.with.the.mergers..
2. Activities of the university sector.The.main.functions.of.the.eight.universities.are.education.and.research.as.well.as.ex-change.and.dissemination.of.knowledge..Following.the.mergers.with.GRIs.the.university.sector.moreover.has.competence.in.the.area.of.research-based.public-sector.services.as.the.sector.now.delivers.research-based.public-sector.services.to.some.of.the.ministries..The.aim.of.this.broadened.university.competence.is.to.conduct.research.and.related.serv-ices.directed.at.aiding.the.decision.making.of.the.authorities..The.universities.thereby,.like.the.remaining.GRIs.contribute.to.development.of.knowledge.to.be.used.by.public.authori-ties.in.the.political.and.administrative.decision.process.and.public.debate,.in.innovation.in.private.enterprises.and.for.research.based.education..In.addition,.the.universities.conduct.a.range.of.services.related.to.statistics,.to.supervisory.and.advisory.functions,.and.to.authori-ties.that.are.important.to.society..Moreover,.the.universities.train.researchers.and.graduates.Table.1.shows.the.respective.turnovers.and.numbers.of.bachelor,.master.and.PhD.students.at.the.eight.universities..Table.2.shows.the.numbers.of.researchers.(divided.over.different.positions).at.the.universities..In.section.3.5.and.3.6,.further.key.figures.on.the.activities.and.financing.of.the.universities.as.well.as.of.the.GRIs.are.presented.Table 1: Turnovers (2009)* and numbers (2007)** of bachelor, master and phd studentsUniversityaalborg Universityaarhus Universitycopenhagen business schoolTechnical University ofdenmarkiT-UniversityUniversity of copenhagenroskilde UniversityUniversity of southerndenmarkTotalTurnovermdkk1,8135,1401,0403,5271896,2916822,10220,7847,15914,5646,6703,7484221,1524,0038,14665,4843,81314,7586,1942,42299716,4703,3376,07554,0666291,194168798432,1682465445,790bamaphdTotal numberof students10,97229,55012,8646,1701,03937,7967,34014,252119,983
*figures from the appropriations act 2009.**source: rektorkollegiet: Universiteternes statistiske beredskab 2007
94
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
Table 2: numbers of researchers at the universities, 2ndquarter 2008Universityprofessorsassociateprofessors1,7651,602750235524738194295,837assistantprofessors/post docsUniversity of copenhagenaarhus UniversityUniversity of southern denmarkroskilde Universityaalborg UniversityTechnical University ofdenmarkcopenhagen business schooliT-UniversityTotal5784462107217218014441,80695077125674256610102223,0413,2932,8191,2163819521,5284405510,684Total
source: negotiating-database of ministry of finance, 2ndquarter 2008
3. The legal/regulatory framework for the sectorThe.eight.universities.operate.within.the.framework.of.the.2003.University.Act.(Act.no.403.of.28.05.2003).with.amendments.(Act.no.538.of.12.06.2009)..The.aim.of.the.2003.Act.was.to.strengthen.university.research,.education.and.knowledge.exchange.based.on.a.strength-ening.of.the.institutional.framework.of.the.universities..The.Act.entailed.changes.in.the.institutional.area,.with.the.aim.to.increase.the.universities’.prioritisation.and.decision-making.capacity.within.a.framework.in.which.the.academic.self-government.was.main-tained.and.where.the.universities.could.remain.independent.from.special.interests.With.the.2003.University.Act,.the.status.of.the.universities.changed.from.government.in-stitutions.into.“independent.institutions.under.the.public-sector.administration”..The.uni-versities.thus.perform.their.activities.within.the.framework.set.out.in.the.University.Act..The.extent.and.scope.of.the.self-government.can.be.changed.pursuant.to.amendments.implemented.in.the.University.Act..The.Minister.for.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.is.under.a.duty.to.supervise.the.activities.of.the.universities.The.self-governing.status.entails.that.the.universities.are.institutions.within.the.public.law.domain..They.are,.however,.entities.with.legal.and.procedural.capacity,.i.e..they.can.have.rights.and.obligations.and.can.institute.proceedings.before.the.courts.–.e.g..against.the.Danish.state.–.to.settle.disputes..The.universities.are.to.a.wide.extent.subject.to.the.rules.applying.to.government.institu-tions.(certain.staff.issues,.financial.rules.of.disposal,.accounting.regulations.etc.)..Further-more,.in.a.number.of.areas,.a.set.of.rules.has.been.laid.down.governing.issues.pertaining.to.the.academic.activities.of.the.universities..The.universities.are.furthermore.covered.by.the.Danish.Public.Administration.Act.(For-valtningsloven),.the.Danish.Access.to.Public.Administration.Files.Act.(Lov om offentlighed i forvaltningen),.the.Danish.Ombudsman.Act.(Ombudsmandsloven).etc..The.universities.can.abolish.themselves.or.merge.with.other.institutions.subject.to.ap-proval.by.the.Minister.for.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation..If.the.Danish.state.wishes.to.abolish.a.university,.and.it.is.not.possible.to.obtain.the.Board’s.endorsement.of.this,.such.an.abolishment.requires.adoption.by.the.Danish.Parliament..95
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
The.eight.universities.are.protected.against.competition.for.state.funding.from.foreign.and.non-public.Danish.universities..There.is.no.prohibition.against.such.institutions.establish-ing.themselves,.but.they.will.not,.for.example,.be.able.to.offer.study.programmes.with.educational.taximeter.funding..GRIs.generally.function.within.the.framework.of.the.“Act.on.Government.research.institu-tions”.(Act.326.of.5.May.2004),.which.states.that.a.GRI.conducts.research.of.the.highest.international.standard.with.the.following.purposes:> Offer.counselling.within.its.area> Carry.out.research-based.public-sector.services> Carry.out.development.work.with.a.clear.societal.focus> Disseminate.research.results.to.relevant.private.and.public.stakeholders> Maintain.an.operational.capacity.related.to.the.activities.mentioned
The development contractsBesides.the.legal.instruments,.the.individual.universities.are.regulated.via.dialogue.be-tween.the.university.and.the.Ministry.of.Science..The.most.important.of.the.dialogue-based.instruments.are.the.development.contracts..The.universities.draft.proposals.for.their.development.contract..The.contract.is.finalised.following.negotiations.with.the.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation..The.Min-istry.does.not.have.the.authority.to.impose.specific.targets.on.the.university,.nor.does.it.have.the.instruments.to.sanction.any.underperformance,.since.this.would.demand.a.change.of.the.2003.University.Act.The.development.contracts.were.first.introduced.in.connection.with.a.revision.of.the.University.Act.in.spring.1999,.where.each.university.was.offered.a.development.con-tract..There.was.no.obligation.on.the.universities.to.enter.into.contracts..Each.univer-sity.that.wished.to.participate.had.to.prepare.a.framework.and.formulate.a.proposal.in.which.it.stated.its.values.and.targets.and.what.it.intended.to.achieve.in.a.four.year.period.The.second-generation.university.development.contracts.were.introduced.in.2004.aim-ing.at.a.stronger.focus.on.quantitative.targets.and.indicators..Like.the.first.generation.the.second-generation.contracts.were.not.legally.binding.documents..The.contracts.were.supposed.to.serve.as.the.university.board’s.tool.to.monitor.overall.qualitative.targets.and.simple.quantitative.targets..In.2007,.the.third.generation.of.development.contracts.–.for.the.period.2008-2010.–.was.introduced..The.change.was.mainly.reasoned.by.the.mergers.in.2007,.since.they.resulted.in.significant.changes.to.the.map.of.the.research.and.university.area..In.the.2008-2010.development.contracts,.targets.for.the.activities.of.the.university.must.be.set.regarding.research,.education,.dissemination.of.knowledge.and.–.where.appropriate.–.research-based.public-sector.services..All.development.contracts.include.targets.for.16.activities.which.were.considered.relevant.in.establishing.the.basic.targets.for.the.performance.of.the.universities..
96
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
4. University managementThe University BoardThe.Board.is.the.highest.authority.of.the.university..The.tasks.of.the.Board.comprise,.among.others:.approving.the.university’s.budget,.approving.the.accounts,.entering.into.a.development.contract.with.the.Minister.and.employing.and.dismissing.the.rector..The.Board.has.no.authority.in.individual.cases.regarding.other.employees.of.the.university.or.students..The.Board.comprises.a.majority.of.external.members,.i.e..persons.who.are.not.employed.within.the.university..The.Board.elects.a.chair.from.among.its.external.members..The.in-ternal.members.of.the.Board.are.elected.by.and.from.the.academic.staff.of.the.university,.including.PhD.students,.the.technical.and.administrative.staff.and.the.students..Students.must.be.represented.by.a.minimum.of.two.members..The.external.members.are.selected.on.the.merit.of.their.personal.qualifications..The.board.members.are.appointed.for.a.period.of.four.years.(students.one.year.term)..The.members.may.be.re-appointed.to.serve.an.additional.four-year.period.The.University.Act.stipulates.that,.together,.the.members.of.the.Board.must.contribute.to.the.promotion.of.the.university’s.strategic.aims.to.ensure.a.composition.of.the.Board.which.is.so.broad-based.as.to.avoid.a.one-sided.representation.of.specific.competencies,.interests.and.experience..
Executive managementThe.Rector.is.employed.by.the.Board..The.Rector’s.overall.tasks.are.set.out.in.the.Uni-versity.Act..The.Rector.has.the.overall.responsibility.of.the.management.of.the.university.and.makes.recommendations.to.the.Board.regarding.the.appointment.and.dismissal.of.the.other.members.of.the.university’s.executive.management..The.Rector.employs.and.dismisses.deans.at.universities.which.have.a.structure.with.sev-eral.academic.areas..Pursuant.to.the.Act,.the.dean.manages.a.main.academic.area.and.ensures.the.interac-tion.between.research,.study.programmes.and.research-based.public-sector.consultancy.services.within.the.main.academic.area..The.dean.(or.the.rector.at.universities.without.a.main.academic.area.structure).employs.and.dismisses.heads.of.department,.appoints.and.removes.heads.of.studies.and.appoints.and.dismisses.heads.of.PhD.schools.Research.and.teaching.are.normally.the.responsibility.–.as.prescribed.by.the.Act.–.of.the.departments..The.head.of.department.undertakes.the.day-to-day.management.of.the.department..In.consultancy.with.the.study.board.and.the.head.of.studies,.the.head.of.de-partment.must.follow.up.on.evaluations.of.study.programmes.and.teaching.
Employee and student co-determinationThe.basis.for.decision-making.at.the.universities.is.the.university.Board.and.the.appointed.leaders,.from.rector.to.other.leaders.for.parts.of.the.institutions..The.influence.from.staff.and.students.follows.two.tracks..One.is.outlined.in.the.University.Act,.the.other.is.the.same.as.for.other.public.institutions.having.a.minimum.of.25.employees..97
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
The.University.Act.does.not.have.a.general.paragraph.on.the.importance.of.co-determi-nation.for.staff.and.students,.but.it.points.out.three.special.bodies,.the.Academy.Council,.the.Study.Board.and.the.PhD-committee..The.remarks.to.the.bill.for.the.University.Act.say.that.Academy.Council.is.empowered.to.safeguard.academic.freedom.and.that.study.boards.are.empowered.to.safeguard.student’s.influence.(sections.15.and.16)..The.Academy.Council.consists.of.academic.staff.members,.including.PhD.students,.stu-dents,.and.a.chairman.representing.Rector.or.Dean,.depending.on.the.level.at.which.the.council.is.established..The.Academy.Council.has.decision-making.authority.with.respect.to.the.award.of.PhD.and.doctoral.degrees,.and.otherwise.an.advisory.function.on.research.and.educational.issues..The.dean.sets.up.“the.necessary.number”.of.study.boards.with.equal.representation.of.academic.staff.and.students..The.study.board.selects.from.among.its.members.a.chairper-son.from.the.representatives.of.the.academic.staff.and.a.vice-chairperson.from.the.student.representatives..The.study.board.must.ensure.the.organisation,.realisation.and.develop-ment.of.the.study.programme.and.teaching.In.order.to.guarantee.students’.influence.on.the.PhD.process,.the.deans.must.set.up.PhD.committees..The.PhD.committee.issues.pronouncements.within.its.area.on.all.issues.of.importance.for.the.PhD.programme.and.PhD.supervision..The.PhD.committee.consists.of.representatives.of.the.academic.staff.and.of.the.PhD.students..The.other.track.of.influence.is.based.on.the.general.rules.in.the.Danish.labour.market..Each.university.is.required.to.set.up.a.number.of.collaboration.committees.and.an.overall.collaboration.committee.in.the.institution..The.framework.for.the.joint.collaboration.com-mittees.is.determined.in.agreements.set.up.between.the.Danish.state.and.the.trade.unions..The.tasks.of.the.joint.collaboration.committees.concern.general.matters.which.belong.un-der.the.employer’s.managerial.rights..
5. The financial framework for the sectorAs.a.main.principle,.the.financing.basis.of.the.universities.is.based.on.two.sources:.1.. State.funding.earmarked.for.the.universities.in.the.annual.Danish.Appropriations.Act.(Finansloven).under.Section.19(2).–.the.so-called.basic.funding2.. Other.income.from.public.research.councils,.the.EU,.private.donors.etc.State.funding.is.generally.distributed.through.four.channels:1.. Funding.for.education.(taximeter.funding)2.. Basic.grants.for.research3.. Competitive.research.funding.from.the.State,.foundations.etc.4.. Research-based.public-sector.services.fundingThe.Ministry.of.Science,.Technology.and.Innovation.provides.grants.for.the.universities’.general.activities.through.three.of.the.four.channels.(1,.2.and.3).within.the.areas.listed.under.the.individual.universities’.account.under.the.Danish.Appropriations.Act..According.to.the.University.Act.the.university.has.at.its.free.disposal.–.within.its.scope.–.subsidies,.income.and.capital.as.a.whole..The.third.channel.differs.significantly.in.this.respect,.since.universities.grant.conditions.relating.to.competitive.funds.will.typically.be.described.in.detail.in.terms.of.both.purpose.and.disposition..The.fourth.type.of.funding.–.for.research.bases.public.sector.services.–.is.provided.by.the.different.commissioning.ministries.98
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
The.total.turnover.of.the.universities.increased.from.DKK.16.7.billion.in.2003.to.DKK.20.8.billion.in.2009,.which.corresponds.to.an.increase.of.24.per.cent,.cf. figure 2..
figure 2: development in university turnover 2003-2009 (dkk billion in 2009 prices)
25.000
20.000
15.000
10.000
5.000
02003200420052006200720082009
performance based funding for educationbasic grant for researchgrant-financed researchotherresearch-based public-sector servicessource: danish appropriations act 2009, pp. 76-77.note: research-based public-sector services are included from 2007 whenthe activity was merged into the universities.The figure shows ‘grant-financed research’ as the universities’ annualconsumption. for 2009, this consumption has been estimated.
University.basic.funding.is.allocated.to.the.main.objectives.–.education,.research.and.other.purposes..Table.3.(below).shows.the.development.in.university.basic.funding.since.2006.The.two.GRIs.Danish.Space.Research.Centre.and.Risø.are.included.in.table.3,.whereas.the.financing.of.the.other.GRIs.is.not.included..The.latter.is.due.to.that.the.financing.for.these.GRIs.is.not.basic.funding.but.government.commissioned.services.financing..
Table 3: development in the financial basis of the universities 2006-2010million dkk, 2010 priceseducation- taximeter (ordinary)- completion bonus- other*researchother purposes etc.Total basic funding**restructuring fundsource: suggestion for appropriations act 2010.*concerns funds granted to the universities on the basis of the number of international exchange students as well as a development grant for educationallocated under the globalisation agreement in 2006.** basic funds earmarked for the universities in the annual appropriations act.*** suggestion 2010
20064,8064,4202631236,0101,47312,289
20075,1304,6392961956,3491,32012,799
20085,1804,5804011996,6921,23513,107
20095,3914,6784712427,0431,16313,59796
2010***5,3554,6685321556,8711,11913,345215
99
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
In.the.last.20.years,.university.education.funding.has.been.based.on.output.control,.and.this.principle.has.partly.been.introduced.for.the.allocation.of.research.funding.also,.dur-ing.the.past.ten.years..The.main.tendency.is.that.university.basic.funding.is.to.be.increas-ingly.subject.to.incentive.administration.focusing.on.university.output..Table.4.shows.that.the.share.of.basic.funding.related.to.the.total.financing.of.the.universi-ties.has.decreased.Table 4: distribution 2003-2006 between basic funding for university research and competitive funding for the universities.research resourcesbasic fundingresearch income fromcompetitive tendering (publicand private sources)public r&d of gdpprivate r&d of gdpsource: vTU key figures, march 2009
200364 %36 %
200662 %38 %
200758 %42 %
200855 %45 %
200956 %44 %
0.78 %1.78 %
0.77 %1.65 %
0.83 %
0.89 %
0.94 %
Table.5.shows.that.the.shares.of.basic.funding.for.research,.as.well.as.performance.based.funding.for.research.for.each.university,.varies.significantly.amongst.the.universities.
Table 5: distribution (2009) between basic funding and performance based funding for research as percentage of totalturnovers at the individual universities.Universityperformance basedfunding for research,percent of turnover202927181781211basic funding, percentof turnover4731393736293847Turnover mdkk*
University of copenhagenaarhus UniversityTechnical University ofdenmarkUniversity of southern denmarkaalborg Universitycopenhagen business schoolroskilde UniversityiT University of copenhagen*figures from the appropriations act 2009.
6.2915.1403.5272.1021.8131.040682189
Table.6.and.7.show.the.funding.of.numbers.of.staff,.turnovers.and.financing.of.the.GRIs.Table 6: government research institutions funding (million dkk), 2009national research institution2008statens serum institutnfa - The national research centre for the working environmentsfi - The national centre for social researchThe kennedy centregeUs - The national geological surveys of denmark andgreenlandTotalsource: suggestion for appropriations act 2010..
core funding mio dkk2009104,780,248,348,4139,6421,22010103,876,946,344138,5409,598,779,63645,8128,3388,4
100
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
Table 7: research-based public-sector services funding (million dkk), 2009UniversityUniversity of copenhagenaarhus UniversityTechnical University of denmarkUniversity of southern denmarkaalborg Universitycopenhagen business schoolroskilde UniversityiT University of copenhagenTotalsource: suggestion for appropriations act 2010..
research-based public-sector services20088,0479,0361,020,047,0---915,020098,0486,0356,017,035,0---902,020108,0522,0347,016,029,0---922,0
6. Key data regarding university educationTable.8.shows.the.development.in.total.number.of.students.and.the.average.taximeter.fi-nancing.over.the.later.years..The.number.of.students.has.increased.over.the.years.except.for.a.drop.in.2008..This.drop.is.due.to.change.of.admission.rules.(eg..stricter.demands.for.the.mathematic.merits.achieved.in.the.pre-university.education.(in.the.“gymnasium”).The.taximeter.financing.per.student.has.decreased.from.2004.to.2006,.followed.by.a.sig-nificant.increase.from.2006.to.2007..The.increase.from.2007.to.2009.is.less.significant.
Table 8: development in number of university students and taximeter financing per full time equivalent studentUniversity educationintake*# students*student full time equivalentsdkk per student full time equivalents200417,255106,24266,24267,100200517,971106,76568,17566,500200618,244109,07370,02865,700200718,997111,36170,88169,300200816,718111,52973,92669,300200919,183-73,49569,700
* data calculated per oct. 1stthe relevant yearsource: denmark’s statistics, numbers calculated by the danish University and property agency, september 2009 and vTU key figures, march 2009
Table.9.shows.that.the.number.of.Danish.students.abroad.has.stayed.at.an.almost.un-changed.level.from.2002.to.2007,.whereas.the.number.of.foreign.students.in.Danish.uni-versities.has.increased.significantly..Table 9: development in student internationalisationinternationalisationdanish students abroadforeign students in dksource: vTU key figures, march 2009
20023,3993,629
20033,4553,913
20043,5064,357
20053,4364,442
20063,5044,541
2007--
Table.10.shows.the.number.of.bachelor.and.master.intake.and.completion.at.the.individu-al.universities.in.2007.
101
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
Table 10:.bachelor and master intake and completion, 2008UniversityaaUaUcbsdTUiTUkUrUcsdUTotalintake ba1,7634,8692,3841,224465,1751,3562,51919,336intake ma1,4583,7482,4247712684,1531,0741,37715,273completion ba1,3452,7641,62139103,4618921,90112,375completion ma1,4893,0871,2167552373,5906801,19212,246
source: rektorkollegiet: Universiteternes statistiske beredskab 2008
7. Danish performance in the EU’s 7th Framework Programme (Cooperation and Ideas programmes)Table.11.shows.the.participation.of.the.individual.Danish.universities.in.projects.that.are.funded.under.the.Cooperation.Programme.of.the.the.7th.Framework.Programme.Table 11: The total participation of the danish universities* in fp7 cooperation projects (per 15 november 2009)number of fp7cooperation projects inwhich a danish universityis coordinator44262100191%number of fp7cooperation projects inwhich one or more danishuniversities is partner724531221205030019010,2 %Total number of fp7cooperation projects inwhich one or more danishuniversities participates764933281406030020911,3 %
Universities
dTUkUaUaaUsdUcbsrUciTUTotalshare of total number offp7 cooperation projects
The.total number.of.FP7.Cooperation.projects.with.one.or.more.Danish.partners.is.324,.which.constitutes.17.5%.of.the.total.number.of.FP7.Cooperation.projects..Besides.univer-sities,.institutions.such.as.university.hospitals,.GRIs.(i.e..GEUS.and.State.Serum.Institute).and.private.companies.participate.in.the.Cooperation.programme..Table.12.shows.the.total.Danish.participation.in.the.Cooperation.programme.in.compari-son.with.other.Nordic.countries.Table 12: overview of participation in fp7 cooperation per nordic countrycountriesnumber of fp7 cooperation projectscoordinated per country37573580Total number of fp7 cooperation projectswith one or more participants from selectedcountries (incl. coordinating institutions)324310213550
denmarkfinlandnorwaysweden
102
Annex 7: The DAnish universiTy secTor – A fAcTuAl overview
Table.13.shows.Grants.awarded.to.Danish.institutions,.as.well.as.to.institutions.of.selected.countries,.from.the.European.Research.Council.(ERC).in.EU’s.FP7.Ideas.Programme..
Table 13: The total number of erc grants awarded to researchers working in denmark and a number of selected countries(fp7 ideas programme)number of startingresearcher grants2007denmarkkUaUdTUstaten serum institutefinlandswedenThe netherlandsswitzerlandUnited kingdom41300711281559number of advancedresearcher grants200842200818192858number of startingresearchers grants2009732*1165151741Total number of ercgrants awarded inperiod 2007-2009(total = 819 grants)15671121346260158
* = one researcher working jointly at aU and a specialised hospital
103
danish University evaluation 2009 – evaluation reportpublished by:The danish University and property agencyunder the auspices of the danish ministry of science,Technology and innovationThe danish University and property agencybredgade 43dk - 1260 copenhagen kTlf: (+45) 3395 1200fax: (+45) 3395 1300[email protected]www.ubst.dklayout: eckardt apsprint: sangill grafiskphotos:lars kruse/aU-foto: p.27 and p.44Tao lytzen for cbs: p.12, p.16 and p.70pernille meyn milthers: p.77christoffer regild: p.8isbn 87-90797-43-4isbn 87-90797-44-2 (digital version)printed in denmark 2009
The publication can be downloaded at www.ubst.dk