Miljø- og Planlægningsudvalget 2009-10
MPU Alm.del Spørgsmål 858
Offentligt
German Bundestag17th Legislative period
Bundestag printed paper17/...4 June 2010
MotionCDU/CSU, SPD, FDP and ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS
Improvement and continuation of an active and effectivecommitment to whale conservationThe Bundestag is requested to adopt the following motion:I. The Bundestag notes:Together with climate change, the loss of biodiversity is the biggest global environmentalchallenge of our times. Biodiversity, and with it the Earth's natural riches and the basis of ourexistence, continues to decrease at an alarming rate. To date, we have still not managed to slowdown the rate of biodiversity loss and there is no reversal to this trend in sight. We must put allour forces together, both on a national and an international level, and fight against the loss ofspecies. As both warning and appeal, the General Assembly of the United Nations proclaimed2010 to be the International Year of Biodiversity.In these times of ever-increasing threats to the variety of life on Earth, the conservation of whalesis of particular importance. Whales play a vital role in the food chain and marine ecosystem.Commercial whaling and the effects of other human activities such as environmental pollution,bycatch and underwater noise pollution have led some species to the brink of extinction and arethe cause of a substantial decrease in the size of global whale populations. Currently the numberof whales killed worldwide every year, and that includes the Antarctic protection zones, is 1,000to 2,000. We can only guess at how fatal the consequences will be for marine ecosystems.The only alternative we have if we want to actively and effectively push for the protection of thelarge sea mammals that inhabit our planet's oceans is to cooperate on an international level. Tothis end, the members of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) decided to adopt amoratorium on commercial whaling in 1986. In spite of this, three IWC members, Norway,Iceland and Japan, continued to engage in whaling for commercial, or as they call it, "scientific"purposes. The fundamental differences between pro-whaling nations and anti-whaling nationshave resulted in a deadlock and prevented further developments that would improve theconservation of whales within the IWC.On 10 May 2007, the German Bundestag unanimously passed a resolution committing itself tothe conservation of whales and demanded that the moratorium on whaling be upheld. At the IWCconference in 2008, with a view to stimulating cooperation within the IWC and making thecommission capable of action, its members decided to create a support group responsible for
drafting a consensus decision regarding the future of the IWC. On 22 April 2010, ChristianMaquieira, the Chilean chairman of the IWC, presented the proposed consensus decision which isto serve as a basis for negotiations at the commission's annual meeting where members willaddress the question of how the IWC will function in future. The proposed consensus decisionincludes provisions for an interim period until the issues in question are resolved. In principle, theGerman Bundestag acknowledges the necessity of modernising the IWC. It appreciates theattempt to reach a compromise and supports the following parts of the proposal intended toimprove the conservation of whales:•the creation of a new South Atlantic whale sanctuary;•the establishment of a Conservation Programme Committee;•the recognition of non-lethal uses and the value of whales;•an increase in participation of non-governmental organisations.In general however, the current version of the proposed consensus decision falls short of itsobjective to improve the conservation of whales worldwide. The present proposed consensusdecision:•condones the introduction of catch quotas for commercial whaling;includes the hunting of highly endangered species (such as fin whales and sei•whales);•denigrates the status of the Antarctic sanctuary created in 1996 by including•catch quotas for the South Ocean sanctuary;•could, by introducing catch limits for commercial whaling, result in the•lifting of the ban on trade in whale products placed by the Convention on•International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).These are the reasons why the German Bundestag rejects the proposed consensus decision in itspresent form. Furthermore, the proposed consensus decision does not yet fulfil the requirementsof the common EU position of 2 March 2009.The German Bundestag anticipates that a potential compromise will effectively and activelypursue whale conservation goals and also open the prospect of putting a complete halt to allcommercial whaling. At the latest, commercial whaling must end at the close of a transitionalperiod within which the advances made in improving whale protection are regularly monitored.Moreover, a compromise must include the following points:•no catch quotas for endangered species and populations (IUCN Red List and IWCscientific committee);•no whaling in protected zones;•a larger reduction in quotas and the installation of quotas defined on a diminishing scalecompared to actual catch figures, accompanied by scientific safeguarding of thecalculation process;•the prevention of the abuse of “scientific” whaling and the enforcement of the current banon trade in whale products as placed by the Convention on International Trade inEndangered Species (CITES).
If such a compromise is not reached at the 2010 IWC annual conference, rather than dealing withcontroversial majority decisions or a potential failure of the IWC annual meeting, it would makemore sense to just take note of the IWC chairman’s proposal and continue subsequentnegotiations in keeping with the above-mentioned points and in preparation for the next annualmeeting in 2011. In this case, the moratorium would be upheld.II. The German Bundestag calls on the Federal Government to:follow the decision of the German Bundestag to commit itself to keeping the ban oncommercial whaling (whaling moratorium) in place and to reject any proposals thatwould lead to the resumption of commercial whaling;enforce the common position of the Council of the EU of March2009, in alliance withother EU countries. Among other things, the common position supports upholding themoratorium on whaling;advocate the active and effective conservation of whales in the EU and the IWC;reject the IWC chairman’s present proposed consensus decision as long as it does notabide by the following conditions:oa substantial reduction of whaling worldwide by delineating a specific phaseoutprocess for commercial whaling, which within the transitional period would aimfor a definitive and early halt to whaling by the close of the transitional period atthe latest;oan end to the hunting of endangered whale species and populations and towhaling in protected zones as soon as possible;ocondemnation of the abuse of “scientific” whaling and the implementation ofmeasures to bring it to a halt;onon-acceptance of any kind of degradation to the Antarctic whale sanctuary byending whaling in the Antarctic Ocean; andoassurance that the CITES ban on trade is not circumvented.Furthermore, the German Bundestag calls on the Federal Government to push for acomprehensive IWC reform process and commit itself to ensuring that:the conservation of whales become an integral part of the IWC;both new sources of danger and whaling itself are approached with resolve;the IWC create additional whale sanctuaries;all whaling activities are permanently placed under the control of the IWC;the hunting of endangered species and populations be banned as soon as possible;all other whaling activities still be subject to scientific evaluation in accordance with theprecautionary principle and an ecological system approach;indigenous whaling be limited to cover local subsistence needs and that the conservationstatus of whales in the mid and long term continue to be significantly improved;Iceland, in view of its application for EU accession, comply with conservation measuresadopted by the European Union and the international community aimed at preserving andfostering whale populations.
Berlin, 4 June 2010Volker Kauder, Dr. Hans-Peter Friedrich (Hof) and parliamentary groupDr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier and parliamentary groupBirgit Homburger and parliamentary groupRenate Kuenast, Juergen Trittin and parliamentary group