EN EN EN
EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, xxx COM(2005) yyy final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT On the review of the Sustainable Development Strategy A platform for action
EN 2 EN COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT On the review of the Sustainable Development Strategy A platform for action (Text with EEA relevance)
EN 3 EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. A Framework for action ................................ ............................... 4 2. Making the change: focusing on key issues ................................ . 6 2.1. Climate change and clean energy ................................ ................ 7 2.2. Public health ................................ ................ 8 2.3. Social Exclusion, demography and migration ............................................................. 9 2.4. Management of natural resources ................................ ............. 10 2.5. Sustainable transport ................................ . 11 2.6. Global poverty and development challenges ............................................................. 12 3. Delivering results ................................ ....... 13 3.1. More effective follow-up ................................ ............................ 13 3.2. Better policy making ................................ .. 14 4. Conclusions ................................ ................ 16
EN 4 EN Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy Europeans  value  quality  of  life.  They  want  to  enjoy  prosperity,  a  clean  environment,  good health,  social  protection  and  equity.  They  want  this  not  only  for  themselves  but  for  their children  and  grandchildren.  In  the  face  of  a  rapidly  changing  world  –  a  world  in  which  the pace  of  change  can  seriously  challenge  the  capacity  of  the  economy,  the  social  fabric  and nature  to  adjust  -  Europe  needs  to  modernise  and  keep  at  the  forefront  of  change.  The challenge  is  to  maintain  a  momentum  that  mutually  reinforces  economic  growth,  social welfare and environment protection. This  challenge  and  the  imperative  for  change  were  recognised  by  the  European  Council  in Gothenburg in 2001 with the adoption of the Sustainable Development Strategy to which an external dimension was added in 2002 at the European Council in Barcelona. The principles and objectives of sustainable development – economic prosperity  , social equity, environment protection and international responsibilities- were reaffirmed by the European Council in June 2005 when they adopted guiding principles for sustainable developmen t and figured centrally in the discussions of European Heads of State at Hampton Court in October 2005. Europe  has  made  a  good  start  in  applying  these  principles  of  sustainable  development. Important initiatives have been taken in the renewed Lisbon process, in the social sphere and in  the  pursuit  of  environment  protection.  However,  the  rapid  pace  of  change  requires  the stepping up of efforts to keep Europe on a sustainable path. With a strengthened commitment to  growth  and  jobs,  combined  with  a  determination  to  preserve  and  protect  Europe’s  social and   natural   heritage,   to   exploit   knowledge,   to   foster   innovation,   to   approach   policy development in an integrated way and to provide financial means, it can be done. Governments  will  always  be  an  important  part  of  the  solution  as  they  set  the  framework within  which  citizens  and  businesses  take  decisions.  But,  sustainable  development  cannot only   be   about   what   governments   can   do.   All   stakeholders,   businesses   and   citizens   in particular, need to be empowered and encouraged  to come up with new and innovative ways to   address   the   challenges   and   seize   the   opportunities.   Europe   cannot   address   all   these challenges alone, and has shown determination to work with international partners on global issues and in a global perspective. 1. A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION Sustainable development is the overarching  long term goal of the European Union set out in the  Treaty.  The  European  Council  set  out  a  strategy  in  2001  for  moving  toward  this  goal . Since  then,  ambitions  have  been  translated  into  policy  initiatives  which  in  turn  are  bringing results on the ground. The framework for action is in place.  On the economic side, the renewed  Lisbon strategy is the  motor  for   growth  and  jobs.   It   will  help  the  EU  adapt  to  the  challenges  of   global competition  and  an  ageing  population.  A  stronger  European  economy  is  vital  to  and  part  of sustainable  development;  it  will  help  generate  the  means  to  invest,  for  example  in  a  cleaner environment,  in  better  education  and  health  care  and  in  social  protection.   In  turn,  more sustainable use of natural resources  and increased social justice are  critical to our economic success.
EN 5 EN Recognising   these   linkages,   the   EU   is   exploiting   the   mutually   reinforcing   elements   of economic,   social    and    environment    policy.   The    Commission    now    undertakes    impact assessments  for  all  major  policy  proposals  to  assess  their  contribution  to  sustainability.  The reform of the agricultural and fisheries policy, the reinforcement of rural development policy as well as the modernisation of cohesion policy reflects this commitment to integrated policy making. The EU has put a policy framework in place to combat climate change, including an ambitious  emission  trading  system  for  CO2  to  encourage  industrial  plants  to  reduce  their emissions at least cost. Several cross-cutting and thematic strategies and action plans1, often accompanied by specific targets and milestones have been adopted. These include joint efforts across a wide range of areas,  for  example,  to  improve  security,  public  health,  enhance  social  inclusion,  strengthen cohesion  and  to  halt  the  loss  of  biodiversity,  improve  soil,  water  and  air  quality.  Member States  and  local  and  regional  governments  have  also  acted  across  the  board,  for  example  to address  social  exclusion,  to  prepare  for  the  impact  of  an  ageing  society,  reduce  greenhouse gas emissions and improve the quality of local public transport. 2 This review takes account of these achievements and sets out further concrete actions for the coming years. It is the culmination of a review process launched in early 2005 which has three closely related elements, forming a package: a  Commission  Communication  adopted  in  February  2005,  taking  stock  of  progress  and proposing first orientations, Guiding Principles adopted in June 2005 by the European Council, this Communication focusing on implementation and actions. In developing this package, the Commission has consulted widely and listened to the Council and  Parliament,  Member  States,  NGO’s,  citizens  and  stakeholders3.  The  main  lessons  from this  dialogue  are  that  the  reviewed  Strategy  needs  a  stronger  focus,  a  clearer  division  of responsibilities,   wider   ownership   and   broader   support,   a   stronger   integration   of   the international dimension and more effective implementation and monitoring. The  objective  of  this  review   is  not  to  replace  but  to  further  develop  the  Sustainable Development  Strategy.   It  is  committed  to  ensuring  that  links  between  European  policy initiatives are exploited and tradeoffs assessed to achieve sustainability objectives. The review Identifies key issues where a stronger impetus is needed in coming years Suggests that the external dimension of sustainable development (e.g. global resource use, international  development  concerns)  be  factored  into  internal  policy  making  and  that  the impact of European policy choices on global sustainable development be more consistently assessed 1 A broad overview of the different EU strategies and action plans that work in support of sustainable development is provided at Annex II. 2 Key examples of progress achieved have been set out in the Commissions Communication of February 2005 COM (2005) 37. See also the December 2005 Eurostat publication on Sustainable  Development Indicators. 3 Commission Communication ofin February 2005 COM (2005) 37. The Commission received more than 1100 contributions during the consultations.
EN 6 EN Proposes   ways   to   measure   progress   and   regularly   review   priorities,   with   a   view   to facilitating greater coherence between Member State and EU strategies Recommends a  continuous dialogue with  the people and organisations - business leaders, regional  and  local  authorities,  NGOs,  academia,  and  citizens  organisations  -  who  are engaged and committed to making change happen 2. MAKING THE CHANGE: FOCUSING ON KEY ISSUES This  Review  highlights  a  number  of  key  issues  which  need  a  strong  push  at  the  highest political  level  to   engage  the  public,  speed  up  decision-making  and  action  at  all  levels, encourage  more  ‘joined  up’  thinking  and  accelerate  the  uptake  of  new  and  better  ideas.   It recognises  the  need  to  check  on  progress  regularly  and  makes  suggestions  as  to  how  to  do that. In moving ahead on the specific issues, a number of cross cutting factors need to be taken into account.  Trends  are  inter-linked  and  therefore  it  is  necessary  to  continue  to  examine  sector policies  in  the  round,  in  an  integrated  framework.  The  fight  against  climate  change,  for example, is multi-faceted, with both energy and transport policies having a key role to play in reduction  of  green  house  gas  emissions.  Climate  change  has  social  impacts,  for  example because  severe  climate  events,  such  as  flooding  and  drought,  often  disproportionately  affect the  weakest  regions  and  parts  of  the  population.  Europe  is  already  exploiting  the  positive linkages  across  policy  areas.  Action  on  sustainable  energy  is  being  taken  with  a  view  to enhancing security of energy supply, reducing climate change and local air pollution, poverty and improving security, while promoting rural and local development. There are nonetheless trade-offs.  Some  policies  engender  adjustment  costs  and  ways  need  to  be  found  to  balance tradeoffs in an optimal manner. Effective responses require international co-operation and solidarity. The EU is committed to poverty alleviation in developing countries and is working closely with the United Nations in moving  towards  the  achievement  of  the  Millennium  Development  Goals.  It  is  engaged  in  a range  of  multilateral  efforts,  for  example,  in  working  with  others  to  meet  commitments  on biodiversity,  fish  stocks,  energy  and  water  agreed  at  the  World  Summit  on  Sustainable Development,  and in combating climate change. The EU will use its influence to bring more nations   behind   an   ambitious   sustainable   development   agenda.   It   will   also   use   its   own instruments,  such  as  trade  and  co-operation  agreements,  to  drive  change  and  will  factor  the external dimension into its internal policy making. The EU and Member States need to continue to invest in research and technology to find new cost effective and resource efficient ways of production and consumption. By harnessing new technologies -  IT and communication tools, alternative energy generation, low environmental impact  products  and  processes,  new  fuels  and  transport  technologies  –  Europe  can  make  a break   through   in   resource   efficiency   which   has   the   potential   to   drive   growth   along   a sustainable path. Education plays a key role in facilitating the changes that are part of sustainable development. It ensures that people have the skills to adapt to global change, that knowledge is spread and that stakeholders become engaged in change.
EN 7 EN 2.1. Climate change and clean energy Climate  change  is  happening.  It  cannot  be  prevented  but  it  can  be  contained  at  acceptable levels  and  its  negative  impacts  can  be  significantly  decreased.  It  is  a  global  problem  that demands global solutions. More effort is needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, not only in the EU but by other major emitting countries and emerging economies. It is also essential that  the  EU  adapts  to  climate  change  and  helps  developing  countries  in  particular  to  do likewise. The  necessary  changes  will  affect  some   groups,  sectors  or  countries  more  than  others. Developing   mechanisms   to   help   those   more   seriously   affected   and   to   motivate   all international partners to implement active climate change policies is important. Reducing climate change provides important social and economic opportunities and will help reduce  other  unsustainable  trends.  Changing  our  patterns  of  energy  use  could,  for  example, save  the  EU  at  least  20%  of  its  present  energy  consumption  cost-effectively  -  a  saving equivalent  to  the  combined  energy  consumption  of  Germany  and  Finland.  The  EU  is  well endowed with renewable sources of energy- wind, solar, biomass, wave, hydro, geothermal- and has the technologies to use these to meet a far greater proportion of its demand for heat, electricity and fuel. Beyond  the  obvious  economic  returns,  experience  shows  that  measures  to  reduce  climate change  and  exploit  the  EU’s  own  potential  for  efficiency  and  renewable  energy  have  many other  knock on benefits - increased security of supply, reduced emissions of other pollutants, local development and quality employment. It also helps the EU maintain a leading position in  innovative  technologies,  at  a  time  when  strong  competition  is  developing  in  these  areas. Moreover, the EU is also well placed to assist developing countries achieve economic growth using  least  polluting  technologies,  for  example  through  the  Clean  Development  Mechanism under  the  Kyoto  Protocol,  which  enables  the  transfer  of  these  technologies  to  developing countries.The potential is there. It needs to be exploited. Key actions: The EU will seek commitments to cut greenhouse gas emissions further, beyond the end of existing commitments in 2012, by developing proposals and working towards broader international    agreements    that    cover    all    greenhouse    gases    and    sectors,   encourage innovation and include measures for adaptation.  The EU emissions trading scheme could serve as an example for an international carbon market. The  EU  will  develop  future  climate  policy  through  the  second  phase  of  the  European Climate   Change   Programme,   working   with   stakeholders   to   develop   new   actions   to systematically    exploit    cost-effective    options,    covering    for    example    cars,    aviation, technology  development  and  adaptation.  The  EU  and  Member  States  will  review  the  EU Emissions Trading Scheme with a view to further developing it and consider its extension to other greenhouse gases and sectors, such as aviation. At  their  informal  meeting  in  Hampton  Court  in  November  2005  the  Heads  of  State  and Government agreed to ask the Commission to develop a re-invigorated sustainable, secure
EN 8 EN and competitive European energy policy. The Commission is developing  major initiatives on  biomass4  and  biofuels  in  2006.  It  will  also  launch  a  debate  in  2006  on  EU  policy  on renewable  energy  up  to  2020,  including  on  the  share  of  the  energy  mix  from  renewable sources. This  would provide a  clear target for all actors involved, providing the certainty sought by business and investors. The EU will continue to promote the use of renewable energies worldwide. The Commission will propose an action plan on energy efficiency to realise the estimated 20%  cost  effective  savings  potential.  A  strong  push  is  needed  on   energy  savings  in buildings,  to  go  beyond  the  current  laws  on  energy  performance  in  buildings  to  help households in particular. The Commission will work with Member States using structural funds  to  realise  energy  efficiency  goals, and in particular with those Member States with the greatest potential for improvement. 2.2. Public health Health is a global issue. Diseases spread quickly across continents. Europe needs to increase its  capacity  to  fight  cross-border  health  threats.  EU  efforts  have  to  be  accompanied  by effective action in neighbouring countries and at global level. Fighting health threats requires rapid  and  effective  response  and  functioning  health  systems,  management,  technology  and infrastructure capability. One Member State’s incapacity to react could put the whole EU at risk. Bridging health inequalities across the EU is therefore crucial. The   EU   also  has   an  obligation  to  support  international   efforts  to  improve  health  care. Currently 40 million globally suffer from HIV/Aids. 24 million people have died, 5 million of them children. Malaria kills more than a million people every year – mostly children in Sub   - Saharan Africa. The growing antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria remain a serious problem. Health   promotion   and   disease   prevention   (by   addressing   health   determinants   at   the appropriate level)  will reduce the economic and social burden of illness in the long-term. In addition, better knowledge of the effects of pollutants  on health, will also facilitate improved preventive and planning measures Key actions: For the EU and its Member States to: upgrade   their   action   plans   on   handling   health   threats   (in   preparation   for   a   possible pandemic,   taking   account   of   the   recently   updated   guidance   on   pandemic   influenza preparedness). agree and implement an EU Strategy to address HIV/ AIDS, including by taking steps to improve   surveillance   and   strengthen   co-operation   between   Member   States.   For   third countries,  efforts  need  to  be  stepped  up  to  implement  the  existing  EU  Programme  for Action to confront HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. coordinate  research  into  the  links  between  environmental  pollutants,  exposure  and  health impacts   to   improve   our   understanding   of   what   environmental   factors   cause   health problems and how best to prevent them 4 Add reference to COM (when adopted Dec. 2005) 628.
EN 9 EN 2.3. Social exclusion, demography and migration Tackling poverty and social exclusion in the EU is not just about increasing low incomes. It is about  promoting  access  to  employment,  housing,  mobility,  health  care,  communication  and information services and above all education and skills training. A significant share of the EU population   (15%)   is   at   risk   of   poverty.   Childhood   poverty   is   a   particular   concern.   As discussed  at  the  informal  Heads  of  State  and  Government  meeting  at  Hampton  Court,  the fight against social exclusion has to be given urgent attention. The EU not only faces economic but also significant social challenges as a result of its ageing society.  Ageing  of  the  population  will  accelerate  until  2040,  which,  coupled  with  a  drop  in fertility  rates,  will  cause  the  working  population  to  contract. In  fact,  lower  fertility  together with rising life expectancy could mean that, by 2050, there will be two people of working age to support each elderly person, compared to four people today. These trends could also reduce growth rates. Governments  need  to  prepare  Europe's  economy  and  society  for  the  ageing  of  many  of  our societies.  Boosting  productivity  and  employment  participation,  in  particular  that  of  older workers  and  women,  is  necessary  to  maintain  our  capacity  for  sustained  economic  growth. Modernisation  of  Europe's  social protection  systems,  notably  in  the  areas  of  pensions  and long-term care, is key as is the promotion of active and healthy ageing. More family-friendly policies   are   needed.   Effective   management   of   migration   flows,   including   the   positive integration of migrants and their families is essential. This also highlights the need to invest more and better in human capital from a lifecycle perspective to maintain the employability of workers. This includes the implementation of effective lifelong learning strategies by Member States. Key Actions: In  response  to  the  discussions  of  heads  of  state  and  government  at  Hampton  Court  in October  2005,  the  Commission  will  present  a  communication  in  early  2006 which  will look  at  ways  in  which  the  EU  can  help  Member  States  respond  to  the  demographic challenges  it  faces,  notably  by  promoting  active  ageing  strategies,  the  integration  of immigrants and better conditions for families. It will consult social partners on whether to propose new initiatives to support reconciliation of work and private life. The Commission proposes a European Year of combating poverty and social exclusion. A roadmap for equality between women and men will be presented in 2006, to help achieve gender  equality  and  help  address  the  EU’s  demographic  challenge.  The  EU  supports  the efforts   of   Member   States   to   modernise   social   protection   systems   to   ensure   their sustainability. The   EU   and   its   Member   States   should   continue   to   develop   an   EU   policy   on   legal migration,   strengthen   the   integration   of   migrants   and   their   families   and   fight   illegal immigration.   The   Commission   has   proposed   support   to   Member   States   integration measures  through  a  European  Fund  for  the  integration  of  Third  Country  Nationals  for 2007-2013. It has issued a policy plan on legal migration, including admission procedures. It will also propose a common policy framework to fight illegal immigration in 2006.
EN 10 EN 2.4. Management of natural resources We rely heavily on flows of natural resources – for raw materials, food, energy and land    - and on natural   processes   to   “absorb”   the   increasing   waste   produced   by   a   growing   human population,  now  of  some  six  billion.  The  UN’s  2005  Millennium  Ecosystem  Assessment suggests that two-thirds of the ecosystem services, on which humans depend, are in decline. Europe's  demands  on  the  planet  have  risen  by  almost  70  per  cent  since  the  early  1960’s. Europeans  are  estimated  to  use  4.9  hectares  of  productive  land  on  average  per  person  to support their lifestyles (compared to 9.5 for the USA and 1.5 for China), whereas  the global average is 1.8 hectares. Certain  land  and  sea  use  patterns  have  led  to  increased  traffic  congestion,  energy  use  and pollution,  increased  risk  from  flooding  and  loss  of  landscapes,  habitats,  and  biodiversity5. Global  patterns  of  resource  use  are  of  concern  as  they  are  reducing  the  earth’s  regenerative capacity and the services that nature provides. The loss of bio-diversity, prompted in part by climate  change,  has  economic  impacts,  including  on  tourism  and  sectors  such  as  agriculture that  are  dependent  on  ecosystem  services  (pollination,  soil  fertility,  water  availability  and quality) or other sectors that use biological information as a source of innovation. By taking a lead in finding innovative solutions to a better management of resources, the EU can promote a more resource efficient economy and position itself as a world leade r in eco- efficient technologies. There is a growing realisation- not least among business- of the scale of   opportunity   to   be   seized   in   investing   in   eco-innovation.   The   market   for   sustainable products  and  processes  will  have  to  grow  to  meet  the  demands  of  a  fast  growing  global ‘middle’   class,   for   consumer   goods   and   services   alongside   environmental   quality.   A coordinated  approach,  anticipating  the  need  to  shift  to  more  sustainable  production  and consumption process, will provide Europe with a competitive edge. Governments  have  a  major  role  in  ensuring  success,  by  providing  a  predictable,  long-term regulatory  framework  that  rewards  eco-innovation  to  support  businesses  now  looking  to develop  sustainable  activities.   Public  authorities  have  the  purchasing   power  to   generate momentum  for  change.  In  the  EU,  for  example,  public  bodies  (such  as  local  authorities, schools, hospitals) buy EURO 1600 billion worth of products and services each year – 16% of our  GDP.  This  can  be  used  to  create  the  critical  mass  needed  for  the  market  success  of sustainable technologies. Key actions: Member  States  should,  together  with  the  Commission,  exchange  experiences  and  best practice  on  shifting  taxation  from  labour  to  consumption  and  /or  pollution  in  a  revenue- neutral way, to contribute to the EU goals of increasing employment and of protecting the environment.   In   addition,   Member   States   should   make   more   effective   use   of   their considerable procurement power to support the uptake of innovative, more energy-efficient and cleaner applications. The Commission will propose a directive on public procurement of green vehicles. 5 The European Environment Agency’s 2005 report on the State of the Environment recognises that over the  past  30  years  important  progress  has  been  made.  However,  the  environmental  situation  in  many aspects  remains  unsustainable.  This  can  only  be  addressed  through  more  effective  integration  of environmental concerns into other policy areas.
EN 11 EN The EU will work with Member States and stakeholders to promote eco-innovation and to expand the market for eco-technologies. Member States should implement their roadmaps for environmental technologies. In the context of the 7th Research framework programme, the EU will provide funding to catalyse actions and drive forward research and technology development in key areas including hydrogen and fuel cells. The  Commission  will  draw  up  an  action  plan  to  promote  sustainable  production  and consumption, building on ongoing initiatives and instruments such as resource  and waste policies, integrated product policy and standards, environmental management schemes and innovation and technology policies, to reinforce their impact, address any gaps and ensure their contribution to global initiatives The  EU  and  Member  States  should  ensure  sufficient  funding  and  management  of  the Natura  2000  network  of  protected  areas,  and  better  integrate  biodiversity  concerns  into internal and external policies to halt the loss of biodiversity. 2.5. Sustainable transport The availability of affordable transport has benefited us all. But we have also suffered from downsides   such   as   congestion,   health   impacts   and   environmental   degradation.   As   the economy   grows,   so   has   transport   demand.   High   growth   means   that   despite   significant improvements  in  vehicle  performance,  negative  impacts  are  rising  and  current  trends  are unsustainable. The   benefits   of   mobility   can   be   provided    with   much   lower    economic,   social   and environmental impacts. This can be done by reducing the need for transport (e.g. by changing land-use,    promoting    telecommuting    and    videoconferencing),    making    better    use    of infrastructure  and  of  vehicles,  changing  modes,  for  example  to  use  rail  instead  of  road, cycling   and   walking   for   short   distances   and   developing   public   transport,   using   cleaner vehicles and developing alternatives to oil such as bio-fuels and hydrogen powered vehicles. The   benefits   of   more   sustainable   transport   are   wide   ranging   and   significant:   tackling congestion thereby cutting costs to businesses, saving people time and improving access for regional and local development, reducing climate change and biodiversity impacts, increasing security of energy supply  by reducing oil dependence; improving the local environment and reducing impacts on health, in particular in urban areas. Key actions: The  EU  and  its  Member  States  should  focus  on  making  alternatives  to  road  transport  a more  attractive  option  for  freight  and  passengers,  including  by  developing  the  Trans- European Networks and intermodal links for freight logistics, to allow goods to shift easily between road, rail, and water transport. This will be the subject of a major political debate in the second half of 2006. The European Commission will continue to examine the use of infrastructure charging in the EU, drawing on successful local congestion charging schemes, EU-wide infrastructure charging  for  lorries  and  new  opportunities  arising  with  new  satellite,  information  and communication technologies. The  Commission  will  propose  a  package  of   measures   to  improve  the  environmental
EN 12 EN performance of cars by promoting clean and energy efficient vehicles including a Directive on  the  procurement  of  such  vehicles,  new  vehicle  standards,  and  increasing  the  use  of biofuels. It has already proposed that Member States differentiate taxes on passenger cars according to CO2 emissions. 2.6. Global poverty and development challenges The global threats to sustainable development are all interconnected. Poverty, environmental degradation and conflict feed each other. More than one billion people live on less than one dollar a day and 2.7 billion live on less than two dollars. 2.6 billion people - over 40 per cent of  the  world's  population -  do  not  have  basic  sanitation,  and  more  than  one  billion  still  use unsafe  sources  of  drinking  water.  Not  only  is  poverty  and  inequality  unjust  but  they  are  a threat  to  world  development,  long  term  prosperity,  peace  and  security.  Globalisation  means that our collective prosperity and security depend critically on success in fighting poverty. Action  is  needed  at  all  levels  –  by  the  EU    bilaterally  as  well  as  multilaterally,  and  in  an integrated way. The EU reaffirmed its commitment to global sustainable development at the UN World Summit in September 2005, by implementing actions from of the  World Summit on   Sustainable   Development,   working   towards   achieving   the   Millennium   Development Goals, and pursuing the Doha Development Agenda. To meet global challenges, the EU has to make sure that its internal and external policies work well together for maximum impact. The EU is at the forefront of international efforts to eradicate poverty. It provides over half of the  world’s  aid  and  has  committed  to  further  increase  this  assistance,  both  in  quality  and quantity. It has recently adopted a “European Consensus on Development”  , setting a common vision and means for development. Key Actions: The  EU  and  its  Member  States  should  increase  their  volume  of  aid  to  0.7  %  of  Gross National  Income  (GDI)  in  2015  achieving  an  intermediate  target  of  0.56  %  in  2010  with individual objectives of 0.51 % for the EU 15 and 0.17 % for the EU 10. The EU and its Member States should increase the effectiveness, coherence and quality of their  aid  policies  in  the  period  2005  –   2010  by  greater  co-ordination  between  Member States,  the  development  of  a  Common  EU  Programming  framework;  using  more  joint actions and co- financing of projects, increasing coherence between development and other policies.  They  should  increase  the  quality  of  aid  through  effective  budget  support,  debt reduction and untying of aid. The  EU  will  advocate  the  improvement  of  international  environmental  governance,  inter alia   through   the   creation   of   a   UN   Environmental   Organisation   and   strengthening   of multilateral environmental agreements. It will step up its efforts to ensure that international trade  is  used  as  a  tool  to  achieve  genuine  global  sustainable  development,  both  in  socio- economic  and  environmental  terms.  It  will  do  so  both  in  a  multilateral  context  (WTO, Doha Round) and as part of its regional and bilateral trade relations.
EN 13 EN 3. DELIVERING RESULTS 3.1. More effective follow-up There  is  a  need  for  monitoring  and  follow-up.  This  can  be  done  without  creating  new procedures or more paperwork. It will involve: submitting a progress report from the Commission every two years. It will draw on the set of  sustainable  development  indicators,  designed  with  the  assistance  of  national  experts, adopted  by  the  Commission  in  February  20056.  A  first  report  with  the  latest  statistical information accompanies this Communication. the European Council and the European Parliament discussing progress, on the basis of the Commission’s    report,    reviewing    priorities    and    providing    general    orientations    on sustainable development at least every two years. the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions playing an   important   role   in   building   stronger   support   for   action,   for   example,   through   the organisation of regular stakeholder discussions and through acting as a catalyst to stimulate debate at national level as well. the  European  Commission  launching  a  review  of  the  Sustainable  Development  Strategy during 2009, involving a process of wide stakeholder consultation. In  addition,  all  Member  States  have  developed  their  own  national  sustainable  development strategies,  or  are  close  to  finalising  them;  many  of  them  report  regularly  on  progress  made. However,  the  opportunity  to  learn  from  each  other,  to  identify  what  has  worked  well  and where the pitfalls are, has not so far been fully exploited. The different national strategies and the European Strategy should as far as possible be mutually reinforcing so that the whole can become more than the sum of its parts. It is therefore proposed that Member States: Review  their  national  strategies  as  appropriate,  in  the  light  of  the  European  Union’s Strategy and publish them by no later than the end of 2006. Member States are encouraged to review, in particular, how the use of their national policy instruments (see section 5.1) could  be  made  more  effective  and  better  integrated  with  actions  taken  or  proposed  at European level; On  the  basis  of  the  reviewed  national  strategies,  undertake  a  light  peer  review  process, focusing  on  specific  themes,  and  in  particular,  seeking  to  identify  examples  of  good policies and practices that could be implemented by all. The peer review could include an external   evaluation   dimension   possibly   with   support   from   the   network   of   national sustainable development advisory councils and involvement of third countries. A first pilot review, under the guidance of the Presidency, and with the assistance of the Commission, involving Member States who wish to volunteer, could be conducted during 2006. 6 SEC (2005)161.
EN 14 EN Consider, where these do not yet exist, the setting up of independent advisory councils on sustainable  development  to  stimulate  informed  debate  and  contribute  to  national  and  EU progress reviews. The  Commission  invites  Candidate  countries  to  complete  their  national  strategies  and  align their reforms with the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. The Commission will take this into account in its progress reports. The EU strategy for sustainable development should feed into the international processes on sustainable development and help progress towards the Millennium Development Goals and the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation. 3.2. Better policy making Improving  policy  coherence:  impact  assessment  and  other  better  regulation tools. The  tools  to  help  policy-makers  to  identify  the  right  approach  exist  and  effective  impact assessment  should  be  applied  from  the  earliest  stages  of  policy  development.  This  enables policy-makers  to  identify  the  best  options  based  on  a  balanced  assessment  of  the  likely economic, social and environmental impacts, the links and tradeoffs between them and taking account of the views of stakeholders. For example, impact assessments of trade proposals are an important way of integrating external impacts into EU decision-making. These all promote the   integration   of   different   policies   leading   to   more   coherent   decisions   and   broader consideration   about   how   to   achieve   more   sustainable   outcomes,   exploiting   win-wins, identifying and addressing knock-on effects and trade-offs in the EU and internationally. Key Actions: All EU institutions should ensure that major policy decisions are based on proposals that have  undergone  impact  assessments,  consistent  with  the  inter-institutional  agreement  on Better Law-making. The Commission will ensure that all of its major initiatives are subject to  impact  assessment  and  that  completed  Impact  Assessments  are  made  available  to  the public when decisions are made. Member States should also make much wider use of impact assessment when developing policies when spending public funds and developing strategies, programmes and projects. They  should  follow  recommendations  in  the  Community  Strategic  Guidelines  to  ensure Cohesion and Structural Funds strengthen synergies between environmental protection and growth. Impact assessment should be complemented by a wider use of evaluation to assess ex-post the impact of policies. The  EU  will  take  the   external  dimension  into  account  looking   at  impacts  of  policy proposals. Using the most effective mix of instruments Governments and other public bodies have a wide range of tools by which they can encourage people to make changes - how they regulate, tax, procure, subsidise, invest, spend and provide information.  The  challenge  is  to  achieve  the  right  policy  mix  so  that  the  use  of  instruments
EN 15 EN and implementation of policies contribute to sustainable development. For instance, Member States should make the best use of structural funds to support sustainable development. Perhaps the most powerful method to promote change is to ensure that markets send the right signals (“getting prices right”), thus providing a powerful incentive for people to change their behaviour and shape the market place accordingly. This can be done by making sure that all of us, producers and consumers alike, face the full costs and consequences of our decisions – when we are making those decisions. For example, this means building the cost imposed on others  in  society  by  “polluters”  i  nto  the  price  of  the  product,  as  some  Member  States  have already  done  (for  example,  through  charges  or  green  taxes).  In  this  way,  producers  have  an incentive to produce and consumers an incentive to consume more environmentally-friendly goods and services. Sometimes governments can have an important impact simply by providing information to the public and businesses, to help them choose better options. Good examples exist of labelling and  information  services  on  the  energy  consumption  and  environmental  performance  of electrical goods, household products and services. Many public authorities across the EU have developed effective communication strategies to encourage citizens to sort waste for recycling purposes, to travel more sustainably or to save energy. Education is a prerequisite for promoting behavioural change. The Commission will work to support  Member  States  actions  on  education,  investment  in  human  capital  and  life  long learning for sustainable development. Key Actions: The EU  will seek to use the full range of policy instruments, whilst promoting the use of market based instruments for the flexibility they offer in meeting sustainable development objectives. Member States should ensure that full use is made of the array of instruments at governments’  disposal  and  that  any  subsidies  provided  are  used  in  a  manner  which  is coherent with the objectives of sustainable development and in accordance with the Treaty. The   Commission   will   mainstream   sustainable   development   in   its   information   and communication activities, for both internal and external EU policies.. The Commission will continue,  together  with  other  Community  institutions,  to  organise  events  and  stakeholder fora on the various strands of the strategy, to raise knowledge and awareness, disseminate new   ideas   and   exchange   best   practice.   Surveys7   consistently   show   that   Europeans’ awareness of sustainability issues is high. The challenge is to translate that awareness into more  sustainable  behaviour.  Effective  communication  needs  to  be  geared  to  national  and local audiences, so Member States have a key role. Mobilising actors and multiplying success The EU and its Member States have a critical role to play, but they cannot - and should not - be  the  sole  guardians  of  the  sustainable  development  agenda.  Other  actors  will  need  to take action;  businesses,  regional  and  local  authorities,  NGOs,  social  partners,  universities  and schools – and    individual citizens and consumers. Progress will rely on the enormous creative and market power of business, and of regional and local bodies and authorities. 7 Refer to Eurobarometer.
EN 16 EN More and more business leaders recognise that it pays to care about sustainable development. The  most  successful  companies  see  that  paying  attention  to  sustainable  development  spurs investment  in  new  technologies,  processes  and  products  which  the  customer  wants8.  They know that it makes good business sense to plan ahead and know where to invest for the future. They know there are opportunities if we have vision, for example by moving towards a low carbon economy. They know they can have influence on those from whom they source their inputs. They need however a stable regulatory framework for action. Social  partners  also  play  a  key  role:  active  dialogue  between  employers  and  employees  is important   for   tackling   the   social   dimensions   of   sustainable   development,   such   as   work organisation, skills and training and equal opportunities. In  addition,  many  regional  governments  and  municipalities  have  stepped  up  their  efforts  to find  practical  solutions  to  problems.  As  they  are  often  the  ones  providing  public  services, from public transport to power generation, from waste collection to caring for the poor, they are  well  placed  to  effect  practical  change  on  the  ground.  There  is  major  scope  for  learning from their successes. Good examples abound. Key Actions: The Commission: Calls  on  the  business  leaders  and  other  key  stakeholders  of  Europe  to  engage  in  urgent reflection   with   political   leaders   on   the   medium-   and   long-term   policies   needed   for sustainability   and   propose   ambitious   business   responses   which   go   beyond   existing minimum legal requirements. Such an initiative fits well with the Commission’s efforts to encourage   corporate   social   responsibility   and   complements   the   dialogue   with   social partners and civil society. The Commission will work with the Presidency to see how best to foster this process. Will invite proposals from other EU institutions and organisations on how best to organise ways  to  reward  the  best  sustainable  development  initiatives  taken  by  regional  and  local authorities 4. CONCLUSIONS There are real opportunities for a better life, greater social justice and the emergence of new innovative industries where Europe, with the right policies, can lead the world. However, we can  only  benefit  from  these  opportunities  if  we  deal  now  with  the  threats  to  sustainability resulting from our way of life. Success in reversing unsustainable trends is both indispensable and achievable, as plenty of success stories from around the world illustrate. This review of the EU’s  Sustainable Development Strategy aims to bring the EU Institutions, Member States, businesses and citizens and their representative organisations together behind a  clear  vision  and  political  framework  for  action.  The  Commission,  therefore,  invites  the Council and the Parliament to endorse the proposed approach, to seek urgent progress on the 8 For example, many relevant studies have found evidence of a positive link between environmental governance and financial performance. The 50 companies rated best in terms of their corporate sustainability reports have a higher credit rating than the average.
EN 17 EN actions  identified,  and  to  work  closely  together  in  the  run-up  to  the  2006  June  European Council to forge strong and broad-based support behind a shared strategy.